The embodiments disclosed herein relate to various medical devices and related components that can make up a surgical system, including robotic and/or in vivo medical devices and related components. Certain embodiments include various robotic medical devices, including robotic devices that are disposed within a body cavity and positioned using a body or support component disposed through an orifice or opening in the body cavity. Other embodiments relate to various systems that have a robotic surgical device and a controller, wherein the device has one or more sensors and the controller has one or more motors such that the sensors transmit information that is used at the controller to actuate the motors to provide haptic feedback to a user.
Invasive surgical procedures are essential for addressing various medical conditions. When possible, minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopy are preferred.
However, known minimally invasive technologies such as laparoscopy are limited in scope and complexity due in part to 1) mobility restrictions resulting from using rigid tools inserted through access ports, and 2) limited visual feedback. Known robotic systems such as the da Vinci® Surgical System (available from Intuitive Surgical, Inc., located in Sunnyvale, CA) are also restricted by the access ports, as well as having the additional disadvantages of being very large, very expensive, unavailable in most hospitals, and having limited sensory and mobility capabilities.
There is a need in the art for improved surgical methods, systems, and devices.
Discussed herein are various robotic surgical systems having various robotic devices. Certain of the robotic devices have coupleable connection ports (also referred to as “nests”) that receive and couple to various camera assemblies. The various connection ports herein can have coupling mechanisms therein for coupling to the robotic device and/or the camera assembly. In addition, certain ports have presence detection mechanisms as well. Further discussed herein are camera assemblies with actuation mechanisms for actuating movement of the steerable distal tip thereof.
In Example 1, a robotic surgical system comprises a robotic surgical device and a removable camera component. The robotic surgical device comprises an elongate device body comprising a distal end and a proximal end, a removable connection port disposed at the proximal end of the device body, and first and second robotic arms operably coupled to the distal end of the device body. The connection port comprises a device body coupling mechanism disposed within the connection port, a camera receiving opening defined in a proximal end of the connection port; a seal package disposed in the removable connection port, the seal package comprising at least two seals; and a camera coupling mechanism disposed within the removable connection port. The removable camera component is removably disposable in the camera receiving opening and through the seal package, the removable camera component comprising a camera body, an elongate camera tube, a flexible section, and a distal imager.
Example 2 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 1, wherein the device body coupling mechanism comprises first and second hinged coupling mechanisms hingedly coupled to the connection port.
Example 3 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 2, wherein each of the first and second hinged coupling mechanisms comprises a coupling mechanism body, a tensioned hinge at a proximal end of the coupling mechanism body, wherein the tensioned hinge is hingedly coupled to the connection port, a coupleable structure at a distal end of the coupling mechanism, wherein the coupleable structure comprises at least one coupling feature configured to be coupleable with a matching coupling feature on the proximal end of the device body and an actuable button.
Example 4 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 1, wherein the elongate device body comprises a male connector disposed at a proximal end of the elongate device body, wherein the male connector is coupleable with the connection port.
Example 5 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 1, wherein the removable connection port further comprises a presence detection mechanism operably coupled to the camera coupling mechanism.
Example 6 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 1, wherein the camera coupling mechanism comprises a slidable body disposed within the connection port, a camera receiving opening defined within the slidable body, an actuable camera release button attached to a first end of the slidable body, and a tensioned spring operably coupled to a second end of the slidable body.
Example 7 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 6, wherein the slidable body is slidable along a plane substantially transverse to a longitudinal axis of the elongate device body.
Example 8 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 1, further comprising a presence detection mechanism comprising a rotatable lever operably coupled to the camera coupling mechanism at a pivot point, wherein the rotatable lever rotates around the pivot point, a first sensing component disposed on the rotatable lever, and a second sensing component disposed on the elongate body, wherein the second sensing component is configured to sense the presence or absence of the first sensing component.
Example 9 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 8, wherein the first sensing component is a magnet.
In Example 10, a removable connection port for a robotic surgical device comprises a connection port body, a distal opening defined at a distal end of the port body, wherein the distal opening is sized and shaped to receive a proximal end of an elongate device body, a proximal opening defined at a proximal end of the port body, wherein the proximal opening is sized and shaped to receive a camera assembly, a seal package disposed in the connection port body, the seal package comprising at least two seals configured to receive a shaft of a camera assembly, a device body coupling mechanism disposed within the connection port body, the device body coupling mechanism comprising first and second hinged coupling mechanisms hingedly coupled to the connection port body, and a camera coupling mechanism disposed within the connection port body. The camera coupling mechanism comprises a slidable body disposed within the connection port body, and a camera receiving opening defined within the slidable body.
Example 11 relates to the removable connection port according to Example 10, wherein each of the first and second hinged coupling mechanisms comprises a coupling mechanism body, a tensioned hinge at a proximal end of the coupling mechanism body, wherein the tensioned hinge is hingedly coupled to the connection port body, and a coupleable structure at a distal end of the coupling mechanism, wherein the coupleable structure comprises at least one coupling feature configured to be coupleable with a matching coupling feature on the proximal end of the elongate device body and an actuable button.
Example 12 relates to the removable connection port according to Example 10, wherein the distal opening is sized and shaped to receive a male connector disposed at the proximal end of the elongate device body.
Example 13 relates to the removable connection port according to Example 10, further comprising a presence detection mechanism operably coupled to the camera coupling mechanism.
Example 14 relates to the removable connection port according to Example 10, wherein the camera coupling mechanism further comprises an actuable camera release button attached to a first end of the slidable body and a tensioned spring operably coupled to a second end of the slidable body.
Example 15 relates to the removable connection port according to Example 10, wherein the slidable body is slidable along a plane substantially transverse to a longitudinal axis of a lumen of the seal package.
Example 16 relates to the removable connection port according to Example 10, further comprising a presence detection mechanism comprising a rotatable lever operably coupled to the camera coupling mechanism at a pivot point, wherein the rotatable lever rotates around the pivot point, and a first sensing component disposed on the rotatable lever, wherein the first sensing component is configured to interact with a second sensing component disposed on the elongate device body when the removable connection port is coupled to the elongate device body.
Example 17 relates to the removable connection port according to Example 16, wherein the first sensing component is a magnet.
In Example 18, a robotic surgical system comprises a robotic surgical device and a removable camera component. The robotic surgical device comprises an elongate device body comprising a distal end and a proximal end, a removable connection port disposed at the proximal end of the device body, and first and second robotic arms operably coupled to the distal end of the device body. The connection port comprises a device body coupling mechanism disposed within the connection port, the device body coupling mechanism comprising first and second hinged coupling mechanisms hingedly coupled to the connection port, an camera receiving opening defined in a proximal end of the connection port, a seal package disposed in the removable connection port, the seal package comprising at least two seals, a camera coupling mechanism disposed within the removable connection port, and a presence detection mechanism operably coupled to the camera coupling mechanism. The camera coupling mechanism comprises a slidable body slidably disposed within the connection port, a camera receiving opening defined within the slidable body, an actuable camera release button attached to a first end of the slidable body, and a tensioned spring operably coupled to a second end of the slidable body. The presence detection mechanism comprises a rotatable lever operably coupled to the camera coupling mechanism at a pivot point, wherein the rotatable lever rotates around the pivot point, a first sensing component disposed on the rotatable lever, and a second sensing component disposed on the elongate body, wherein the second sensing component is configured to sense the presence or absence of the first sensing component. The removable camera component is removably disposable in the camera receiving opening and through the seal package, and the removable camera component comprises a camera body, an elongate camera tube, a flexible section, and a distal imager.
Example 19 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 18, wherein each of the first and second hinged coupling mechanisms comprises a coupling mechanism body, a tensioned hinge at a proximal end of the coupling mechanism body, wherein the tensioned hinge is hingedly coupled to the connection port, and a coupleable structure at a distal end of the coupling mechanism, wherein the coupleable structure comprises at least one coupling feature configured to be coupleable with a matching coupling feature on the proximal end of the device body and an actuable button.
Example 20 relates to the robotic surgical system according to Example 18, wherein the slidable body is slidable along a plane substantially transverse to a longitudinal axis of a lumen defined by the at least two seals in the seal package.
In Example 21, a camera assembly for a robotic surgical system comprises an elongate camera shaft, a camera body coupled to a proximal end of the elongate camera shaft, a steerable tip disposed at the distal end of the elongate camera shaft, a first cable coupled at a first end to the first drive carriage and coupled at a second end to the steerable tip, and a second cable coupled at a first end to the second drive carriage and coupled at a second end to the steerable tip. The camera body comprises a distal end configured to be positionable within a robotic device, and at least one actuation mechanism disposed within the camera body. The distal end comprises a distal nose cone disposed around the elongate shaft, and a coupling mechanism acceptance slot defined proximal to the distal nose cone. The at least one actuation mechanism comprises a rotatable shaft, a first drive carriage threadably coupled to the rotatable shaft, and a second drive carriage threadably coupled to the rotatable shaft. The steerable tip comprises a steerable tip body comprising a camera imager and an illumination component, and a flexible section coupled to the elongate camera shaft and the steerable tip body, wherein the steerable tip body is movable in relation to the elongate camera shaft via the flexible section. Further, actuation of the actuation mechanism causes linear movement of the first and second drive carriages in opposite directions, whereby the first and second cables steer the steerable tip.
Example 21 relates to the camera assembly according to Example 21, wherein the camera body further comprises an external housing and a cylindrical heat sink structure, wherein the cylindrical heat sink structure is disposed within the external housing.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments. As will be realized, the various embodiments are capable of modifications in various obvious aspects, all without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
The various systems and devices disclosed herein relate to devices for use in medical procedures and systems. More specifically, various embodiments relate to various medical devices, including robotic devices and related methods and systems.
It is understood that the various embodiments of robotic devices and related methods and systems disclosed herein can be incorporated into or used with any other known medical devices, systems, and methods.
It is understood that the various embodiments of robotic devices and related methods and systems disclosed herein can be incorporated into or used with any other known medical devices, systems, and methods. For example, the various embodiments disclosed herein may be incorporated into or used with any of the medical devices and systems disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,332 (issued on Mar. 3, 2015 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Robotic Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,834,488 (issued on Sep. 16, 2014 and entitled “Magnetically Coupleable Surgical Robotic Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 10,307,199 (issued on Jun. 4, 2019 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,579,088 (issued on Feb. 28, 2017 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Visualization and Device Manipulation”), U.S. Patent Application 61/030,588 (filed on Feb. 22, 2008), U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,171 (issued on Jan. 1, 2013 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,828,024 (issued on Sep. 9, 2014 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,956,043 (issued on May 1, 2018 and entitled “Methods and Systems of Actuation in Robotic Devices”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/966,606 (filed on Apr. 30, 2018 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Access and Procedures”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/192,663 (filed on Aug. 15, 2008 and entitled “Medical Inflation, Attachment, and Delivery Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/018,530 (filed on Feb. 8, 2016 and entitled “Medical Inflation, Attachment, and Delivery Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,440 (issued on Mar. 10, 2015 and entitled “Modular and Cooperative Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,679,096 (issued on Mar. 25, 2014 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,981 (issued on Nov. 10, 2015 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,883,911 (issued on Feb. 6, 2018 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/888,723 (filed on Feb. 5, 2018 and entitled “Multifunctional Operational Component for Robotic Devices”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,894,633 (issued on Nov. 25, 2014 and entitled “Modular and Cooperative Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 8,968,267 (issued on Mar. 3, 2015 and entitled “Methods and Systems for Handling or Delivering Materials for Natural Orifice Surgery”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,060,781 (issued on Jun. 23, 2015 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Surgical End Effectors”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,757,187 (issued on Sep. 12, 2017 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Surgical End Effectors”), U.S. Pat. No. 10,350,000 (issued on Jul. 16, 2019 and entitled “Methods, systems, and devices relating to surgical end effectors”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/512,510 (filed on Jul. 16, 2019 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Surgical End Effectors”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,089,353 (issued on Jul. 28, 2015 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 10,111,711 (issued on Oct. 30, 2018 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/123,619 (filed on Sep. 6, 2018 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,770,305 (issued on Sep. 26, 2017 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/661,147 (filed on Jul. 27, 2017 and entitled “Robotic Devices with On Board Control & Related Systems & Devices”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/833,605 (filed on Mar. 15, 2013 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/738,706 (filed on Jan. 10, 2013 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Access and Insertion”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/661,465 (filed on Mar. 18, 2015 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Access and Insertion”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/890,860 (filed on Feb. 7, 2018 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices for Surgical Access and Insertion”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,498,292 (issued on Nov. 22, 2016 and entitled “Single Site Robotic Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 10,219,870 (issued on Mar. 5, 2019 and entitled “Single site robotic device and related systems and methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/293,135 (filed Mar. 3, 2019 and entitled “Single Site Robotic Device and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,010,214 (issued on Apr. 21, 2015 and entitled “Local Control Robotic Surgical Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 10,470,828 (issued on Nov. 12, 2019 and entitled “Local Control Robotic Surgical Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/596,034 (filed on Oct. 8, 2019 and entitled “Local Control Robotic Surgical Devices and Related Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,743,987 (issued on Aug. 29, 2017 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Robotic Surgical Devices, End Effectors, and Controllers”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/687,787 (filed on Aug. 28, 2017 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Robotic Surgical Devices, End Effectors, and Controllers”), U.S. Pat. No. 9,888,966 (issued on Feb. 13, 2018 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Force Control Surgical Systems”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/894,489 (filed on Feb. 12, 2018 and entitled “Methods, Systems, and Devices Relating to Force Control Surgical Systems”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/212,686 (filed on Mar. 14, 2014 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/334,383 (filed on Jul. 17, 2014 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/853,477 (filed on Sep. 14, 2015 and entitled “Quick-Release End Effectors and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/504,793 (filed on Jul. 8, 2019 and entitled “Quick-Release End Effectors and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 10,376,322 (issued on Aug. 13, 2019 and entitled “Robotic Device with Compact Joint Design and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/538,902 (filed on Aug. 13, 2019 and entitled “Robotic Device with Compact Joint Design and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/227,813 (filed on Aug. 3, 2016 and entitled Robotic Surgical Devices, System and Related Methods”) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/599,231 (filed on May 18, 2017 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices, Systems, and Related Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/687,113 (filed on Aug. 25, 2017 and entitled “Quick-Release End Effector Tool Interface”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/691,087 (filed on Aug. 30, 2017 and entitled “Robotic Device with Compact Joint Design and an Additional Degree of Freedom and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/821,169 (filed on Nov. 22, 2017 and entitled “Gross Positioning Device and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/826,166 (filed on Nov. 29, 2017 and entitled “User controller with user presence detection and related systems and methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/842,230 (filed on Dec. 14, 2017 and entitled “Releasable Attachment Device for Coupling to Medical Devices and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/144,807 (filed on Sep. 27, 2018 and entitled “Robotic Surgical Devices with Tracking Camera Technology and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/241,263 (filed on Jan. 7, 2019 and entitled “Single-Manipulator Robotic Device With Compact Joint Design and Related Systems and Methods”), U.S. Pat. No. 7,492,116 (filed on Oct. 31, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,796 (filed on Apr. 3, 2007 and entitled “Robot for Surgical Applications”), and U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,073 (issued on May 15, 2011, and entitled “Robotic Devices with Agent Delivery Components and Related Methods”), all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Certain device and system implementations disclosed in the applications listed above can be positioned within a body cavity of a patient, or a portion of the device can be placed within the body cavity, in combination with a support component similar to those disclosed herein. An “in vivo device” as used herein means any device that can be positioned, operated, or controlled at least in part by a user while being positioned within a body cavity of a patient, including any device that is coupled to a support component such as a rod or other such component that is disposed through an opening or orifice of the body cavity, also including any device positioned substantially against or adjacent to a wall of a body cavity of a patient, further including any such device that is internally actuated (having no external source of motive force), and additionally including any device that may be used laparoscopically or endoscopically during a surgical procedure. As used herein, the terms “robot,” and “robotic device” shall refer to any device that can perform a task either automatically or in response to a command.
Certain embodiments provide for insertion of the present invention into the cavity while maintaining sufficient insufflation of the cavity. Further embodiments minimize the physical contact of the surgeon or surgical users with the present invention during the insertion process. Other implementations enhance the safety of the insertion process for the patient and the present invention. For example, some embodiments provide visualization of the present invention as it is being inserted into the patient's cavity to ensure that no damaging contact occurs between the system/device and the patient. In addition, certain embodiments allow for minimization of the incision size/length. Other implementations include devices that can be inserted into the body via an incision or a natural orifice. Further implementations reduce the complexity of the access/insertion procedure and/or the steps required for the procedure. Other embodiments relate to devices that have minimal profiles, minimal size, or are generally minimal in function and appearance to enhance ease of handling and use.
As in manual laparoscopic procedures, a known insufflation system can be used to pump sterile carbon dioxide (or other gas) into the patient's abdominal cavity. This lifts the abdominal wall from the organs and creates space for the robot. In certain implementations, the system has no direct interface with the insufflation system. Alternatively, the system can have a direct interface to the insufflation system.
In certain implementations in which the device is inserted through an insertion port, the insertion port is a known, commercially-available flexible membrane placed transabdominally to seal and protect the abdominal incision. This off-the-shelf component is the same device or substantially the same device that is used in substantially the same way for Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS). The only difference is that the arms of the robotic device according to the various embodiments herein are inserted into the abdominal cavity through the insertion port rather than the surgeon's hand. The robotic device body seals against the insertion port when it is positioned therethrough, thereby maintaining insufflation pressure. The port is single-use and disposable. Alternatively, any known port can be used. In further alternatives, the device can be inserted through an incision without a port or through a natural orifice.
Certain implementations disclosed herein relate to “combination” or “modular” medical devices that can be assembled in a variety of configurations. For purposes of this application, both “combination device” and “modular device” shall mean any medical device having modular or interchangeable components that can be arranged in a variety of different configurations.
Certain embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can be used for colon resection, a surgical procedure performed to treat patients with lower gastrointestinal diseases such as diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer. Approximately two-thirds of known colon resection procedures are performed via a completely open surgical procedure involving an 8- to 12-inch incision and up to six weeks of recovery time. Because of the complicated nature of the procedure, existing robot-assisted surgical devices are rarely used for colon resection surgeries, and manual laparoscopic approaches are only used in one-third of cases. In contrast, the various implementations disclosed herein can be used in a minimally invasive approach to a variety of procedures that are typically performed ‘open’ by known technologies, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes and health care costs. Further, the various implementations disclosed herein can be used for any laparoscopic surgical procedure in place of the known mainframe-like laparoscopic surgical robots that reach into the body from outside the patient. That is, the less-invasive robotic systems, methods, and devices disclosed herein feature small, self-contained surgical devices that are inserted in their entireties through a single incision in the patient's abdomen. Designed to utilize existing tools and techniques familiar to surgeons, the devices disclosed herein will not require a dedicated operating room or specialized infrastructure, and, because of their much smaller size, are expected to be significantly less expensive than existing robotic alternatives for laparoscopic surgery. Due to these technological advances, the various embodiments herein could enable a minimally invasive approach to procedures performed in open surgery today.
In this specific implementation, the robotic device 12 with the camera 14 are both connected to the surgeon console 16 via cables: a device cable 24A and a camera cable 24B that will be described in additional detail below. Alternatively, any connection configuration can be used. In certain implementations, the system can also interact with other devices during use such as a electrosurgical generator, an insertion port, and auxiliary monitors.
The end effectors 56A, 56B on the distal end of the arms 46, 48 can be various tools 56A, 56B (scissors, graspers, needle drivers and the like), as will be described in additional detail below. In certain implementations, the tools 56A, 56B are designed to be removable, including in some instances by a small twist of the tool knob that couples the end effector 56A, 56B to the arm 46, 48. In certain implementations, at least two single-use, interchangeable, disposable surgical end effectors can be used with any of the robotic device embodiments herein (including device 40). Such end effectors can include, but are not limited to, a fenestrated grasper capable of bi-polar cautery, scissors that deliver mono-polar cautery, a hook that delivers mono-polar cautery, and a left/right needle driver set. The tools can be selected for the specific surgical task. Certain forearm and end effector configurations that allow for the removability and interchangeability of the end effectors are disclosed in detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 14/853,477, which is incorporated by reference above. Further, it is understood that any known forearm and end effector combinations can be used in any of the robotic device embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein.
In various implementations, the body 40 and each of the links of the arms 46, 48 can contain a variety of actuators or motors. In certain implementations, the body 40 has no motors disposed therein, while there is at least one motor in each of the arms 46, 48. In one embodiment, any of the motors discussed and depicted herein can be brush or brushless motors. Further, the motors can be, for example, 6 mm, 8 mm, or 10 mm diameter motors. Alternatively, any known size that can be integrated into a medical device can be used. In a further alternative, the actuators can be any known actuators used in medical devices to actuate movement or action of a component. Examples of motors that could be used for the motors described herein include the EC 10 BLDC+GP10A Planetary Gearhead, EC 8 BLDC+GP8A Planetary Gearhead, or EC 6 BLDC+GP6A Planetary Gearhead, all of which are commercially available from Maxon Motors, located in Fall River, MA There are many ways to actuate these motions, such as with DC motors, AC motors, permanent magnet DC motors, brushless motors, pneumatics, cables to remote motors, hydraulics, and the like. As such, the actuation source can be at least one motor, hydraulic pressure source, pneumatic pressure source, or any other actuation source disposed remotely from or proximally to the device 40 such that an appropriate coupling or transmission mechanism (such as at least one cable, at least one hydraulic transmission hose, at least one pneumatic transmission hose, or any other transmission mechanism) is disposed through the body 42.
In one embodiment, the various joints discussed above in accordance with any of the embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can be driven by electrical motors disposed within the device and, in some implementations, near each joint. Other embodiments include the incorporation of pneumatic or hydraulic actuators in any of the device implementations herein. In additional alternative embodiments, the driving actuators are disposed outside the device and/or body cavity and power transmission mechanisms are provided to transmit the energy from the external source to the various joints of any device herein. Such a transmission mechanism could, for example, take the form of gears, drive shafts, cables, pulleys, or other known mechanisms, or any combination thereof.
As best shown in
In various implementations, as best shown in
In various implementations, the camera 44 can be re-sterilized for multiple uses. In one specific embodiment, the camera 44 can be reused up to one hundred times or more. Alternatively, it is understood that any known endoscopic camera that can fit through a device body according to any implementation herein can be utilized.
Focusing now on the robotic arms 82, 84 of a robotic device 80 according to one embodiment as shown in
The robotic arms 82, 84 in this implementation have significant dexterity. As shown in
The bi-manual workspace 110 is approximated by an ellipse that is rotated 180 degrees about the shoulder pitch joint (J2 in
As can be seen in
Additional features and components of the robotic device include those disclosed in U.S. applications Ser. Nos. 14/334,383, 15/227,813, and 16/144,807, all of which are incorporated by reference above, along with all of the other patents and applications incorporated by reference above. It is understood that any robotic device embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein (including, for example, the robotic devices 12, 40, 80 discussed above), can be incorporated into not only the system embodiments disclosed herein, but any other known robotic surgical system. It is further understood that, according to certain implementations, any robotic device disclosed or contemplated herein can be configured such that it can be cleaned and sterilized for multiple uses. In some embodiments, the device can be reused up to ten times or more.
As shown in
The various camera embodiments herein (including cameras 14 and 44, for example) can, in certain implementations, be coordinated with the device to which it is coupled to create coordinated triangulation between the camera and the arms and end effectors for any configuration, positioning, and use of the device. Further, the steerable tip of any such camera can be robotically articulated so as to reposition the field of view, either automatically or via control by the surgeon using the system console. That is, the camera articulates to ensure the surgeon can view all possible locations of the robotic arms as well as the desired areas of the surgical theater. Further, as the robotic arms move—the steerable camera tip can be coordinated with the arms to move using active joints in coordination with the arm movements to view the entire robot workspace. In certain implementations, the joints of the camera are actively controlled using motors and sensors and a processor (and, in some implementations, a control algorithm contained therein). In these implementations, the processor allows for automated and/or semi-automated positioning and re-positioning of the camera 12 about the pitch (α) and/or yaw (β) rotations relative to the robotic device. It is understood that the various embodiments of systems and devices having such a coordination between the camera and the device (and arms) and the resulting features thereof are disclosed in detail in U.S. Published Application 2019/0090965, which is incorporated by reference above.
Alternatively, in certain implementations as shown in
It is understood that the insertion port 122 also can represent the port 122 through which any robotic device embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein is positioned for any procedure as contemplated herein (including those procedures in which the camera 44 is disposed through the device 40). In one embodiment, the insertion port 122 can be a single use commercially available flexible membrane disposed transabdominally to seal and protect the abdominal incision and allow for positioning the body 42 of the device 40 therethrough. In specific implementations, the insertion port 122 is the same device used in Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS), including the exemplary port 122 depicted in
Returning to the overall system embodiments, such as the system 10 depicted in
The console 16 in this implementation also has right and left hand controllers (or “input devices”) 134A, 134B that can be used to control various aspects of the device 12, 40 and/or camera 14, 44, including movement thereof. The surgeon can interface with the input devices 134A, 134B using the surgeon's hands such that the input devices 134A, 134B can track the movement of the surgeon's hands. In certain embodiments, each of the input devices 134A, 134B can have a surgeon presence sensor to track whether the surgeon's hands are properly engaged. In one exemplary embodiment, the user presence sensor is any of the embodiments disclosed or contemplated in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/826,166, which is incorporated by reference above. In certain implementations, the input devices 134A, 134B can also be configured to provide haptic feedback by pushing on the surgeon's hands to indicate things such as workspace boundaries and collisions between the robot arms, as is described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/227,813 and U.S. Pat. No. 9,888,966, both of which are incorporated by reference above. According to various embodiments, the input devices 134A, 134B can also control open/close functions of the robot's end effectors.
In accordance with some implementations, the surgeon console 16 can also have foot pedals 136 that are configured to be operable by the surgeon's feet to control various robot functions, including, for example, clutching, camera movements, and various electro cautery functions. Alternatively, the pedals 136 can be used to operate any known functions of the robotic device 12, 40 or any other component of the system 10. In a further alternative, any other input devices on the console 16 can be used to control those various functions.
The surgeon console 16 according to certain implementations can be configured such that it can be operated by a surgeon positioned in either a sitting position (similar to Intuitive's da Vinci console) or a standing position (similar to manual laparoscopy). The console 16 in this exemplary embodiment is designed to be easily transported between operating rooms using castors 138 and a transport handle 140. In certain embodiments, the height of the console 16 is adjustable.
Other console and system embodiments that can be incorporated into any system disclosed or contemplated herein are disclosed in U.S. applications Ser. Nos. 14/334,383, 15/227,813, and 16/144,807, all of which are incorporated by reference above, along with any of the other relevant patents and applications incorporated by reference above. The various components in said applications include companion carts, an interface pod, an electrosurgical generator, and the appropriate cables and connections, for example. Further, it is understood that any other known console or controller can be utilized with any robotic device or system disclosed or contemplated herein.
Another camera embodiment is depicted in
The steerable tip 156 can be robotically articulated in two independent directions, according to one embodiment. More specifically, as discussed above in additional detail with respect to the camera assembly 44 embodiment and depicted in
In addition, the handle 152 according to various implementations also has a cable strain relief assembly 184 extending from the proximal end of the handle 152 such that the cable 162 is disposed through the relief assembly 184. In one embodiment, the relief assembly 184 is a tube 184 or other elongate structure 184 through which the cable 162 can be disposed such that the relief assembly 184 has a reinforced structure to reduce the strain applied on the cable 162 when force is applied to the cable 162. It is understood that the cable strain relief assembly 184 can be any known structure for providing strain relief. Alternatively, the assembly 184 can be any known cable strain relief assembly.
The camera handle 152 also has, in this specific implementation, two O-ring seals 186A, 186B disposed around the cable connection 188. The seals 186A, 186B are disposed between the connection 188 and the housing 180, thereby establishing a fluidic seal therebetween and thus helping to prevent fluid ingress. Alternatively, there can be one seal, three seals, or any number of seals disposed around the connection 188. In a further alternative, the seal(s) need not be an O-ring seal, and instead can be any known type of seal.
The distal end of the camera handle 152 has a nose cone 190 extending therefrom, according to one embodiment. As best shown in
In addition, the nose cone 190 has a protrusion (or “collar”) 196 that is disposed around the cone 190 and has both an outer O-ring seal 198A and an inner O-ring seal 198B attached to the protrusion 196 as shown. The outer O-ring seal 198A is disposed on an outer circumference of the collar 196 such that the seal 198A is disposed between the collar 196 and the camera body enclosure 180. Further, the inner O-ring seal 198B is disposed on an inner circumference of the collar 196 such that the seal 198B is disposed between the collar 196 and the cone 190. As such, the seals 198A, 198B help to establish a fluidic seal between the nose cone 190 and the camera housing 180, thereby creating a sealed camera handle 152 that helps to protect the internal mechanical and electrical components during use and cleaning.
In use, the camera assembly 150 is typically held by a user (such as a surgical assistant and/or surgeon) via the camera handle/body 152 when the camera 150 is moved around and inserted into or removed from the device body 42 (or any other device body embodiment herein) (or when used independently of any robotic device as discussed above). Further, the nose cone 190 of the handle 152 is sized and shaped to couple with and assist with attachment to the elongate body 42 (or any other device body embodiment herein) as discussed in additional detail below.
In accordance with one embodiment as shown in
In addition, the camera body 152 also has at least one circuit board 224 disposed therein. In one embodiment, the at least one circuit board 224 can be used to control the camera assembly 150 in any number of known ways. In some non-limiting examples, the at least one circuit board 224 can control the light source 220 or any facet of the lighting, the video signal, the image sensor 160, the actuation mechanisms 226A, 226B, or any sensors present anywhere on or in the camera 150. Alternatively, the camera body 152 can have two or more circuit boards for controlling various components and/or features of the camera 150. Further, the camera body 152 also has an actuator unit (also referred to herein as an “articulation unit”) 226 that actuates the steerable tip 156. That is, the actuator unit 226 is operably coupled to the steerable tip 156 such that the actuator unit 226 actuates the tip 156 to move in both directions as described in additional detail herein: pitch and yaw. In this specific embodiment, the actuator unit 226 is actually made up of two actuator mechanisms: a first (or yaw or left/right) actuation mechanism 226A and a second (or pitch or north/south) actuation mechanism 226B. As will be described in additional detail below, each of the two mechanisms is coupled to the steerable tip 156 via cables that can be used to transfer the motive force use to move the steerable tip 156 as described herein. In one embodiment as best shown in
As best shown in
In addition, each carriage 248A, 248B is coupled to a separate one of the two cables of the cable pair 228, as mentioned above with respect to
Each connection assembly 280A, 280B has both a tension spring assembly 286A, 286B and a tension adjustment mechanism 288A, 288B, both of which will be described in detail below.
According to one embodiment, each tension spring assembly 286A, 286B is operable to absorb force applied to the cable housings 282B, 284B and thereby reduce the strain applied thereto and potentially prevent resulting damage. That is, each tension spring assembly 286A, 286B has a tension spring retainer body 300A, 300B that is slidably disposed through a bushing 302A, 302B and an opening 304A, 304B defined in a body wall 306. Each bushing 302A, 302B is fixedly attached to the body wall 306 such that each spring retainer body 300A, 300B is slidable in relation to the body 152. Each retainer body 300A, 300B has a tension spring 308A, 308B disposed around the body 300A, 300B and positioned between a lip 307A, 307B on the retainer body 300A, 300B and the body wall 306 such that each tension spring 308A, 308B can move between an extended state (as shown in assembly 280A) and a compressed state (as shown in assembly 280B). In addition, each retainer body 300A, 300B has an extendable barrel 310A, 310B extending from a distal end of the retainer body 300A, 300B. Each cable housing 282B, 284B is coupled to the extendable barrel 310A, 310B as shown. It is understood that both the retainer bodies 300A, 300B and the extendable barrels 310A, 310B have lumens 312A, 312B defined therethrough as shown such that the inner cables 282A, 284A can extend therethrough as shown.
Thus, each tension spring assembly 286A, 286B is structured to provide strain relief. For example, if the steerable tip 156 has force applied thereto from an external source (such as a user's hand or collision of the tip 156 with an object), that external force is applied to one or both of the cable housings 282B, 284B. Given that each of the cable housings 282B, 284B is longitudinally incompressible, the force is transferred axially along the length of the housing 282B, 284B and into the retainer body 300A, 300B, which causes the tension spring 308A, 308B to be urged from its relaxed state toward either its compressed or its extended state. All of this occurs without any external force being applied to the inner cable 282A, 284A. Thus, each tension spring assembly 286A, 286B helps to prevent damage to the cables 228A, 228B by absorbing any application of external force thereto through the cable housings 282B, 284B and tension springs 308A, 308B. That is, compression of the tension springs 308A, 308B allows for adjustment of the length of the cable housing 282B, 284B as a result of the external force while protecting the inner cables 282A, 284A from that external force.
Alternatively, the configuration of the tension spring assemblies 286A, 286B need not be limited to the specific components thereof. It is understood that any known assembly for absorbing strain from external forces can be incorporated herein.
Turning now to the tension adjustment mechanisms 288A, 288B, each such assembly 288A, 288B is operable to allow for manually adjusting the tension of each inner cable 282A, 284A. That is, if a user determines that either cable 282A, 284A is too loose or too tight, the user can utilize the appropriate adjustment mechanism 288A, 288B to adjust the tension thereof. Each mechanism 288A, 288B includes the extendable barrel 310A, 310B extending from a distal end of the retainer body 300A, 300B, as discussed above. Each adjustable barrel 310A, 310B has an adjuster nut 314A, 314B that is threadably coupled to the barrel 310A, 310B such that rotation of either nut 314A, 314B by a user causes axial extension or retraction of the respective barrel 310A, 310B. Thus, if either cable 282A, 284A is too loose, the user can rotate either nut 314A, 314B to lengthen the respective barrel 310A, 310B, thereby tightening the cable 282A, 284A. On the other hand, if either cable 282A, 284A is too tight, the user can rotate either nut 314A, 314B to shorten the appropriate barrel 310A, 310B, thereby loosening the cable 282A, 284A.
Alternatively, the configuration of the tension adjustment assemblies 286A, 286B need not be limited to the specific components thereof. It is understood that any known assembly for adjusting the tension of the cables can be incorporated herein.
Further, it is understood that the various camera body embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein are not limited to the specific components and features discussed above. That is, the camera body/handle can incorporate any known mechanisms or components for lighting, transmission of energy/information, articulation, and adjustment/strain relief mechanisms.
As shown in
One embodiment of the seal package 356 is depicted in
As best shown in
The second seal 360 is configured to maintain a fluidic seal when the camera is not disposed through the seal package 356. In this embodiment as shown, the seal 360 is a circular seal having hinged seal walls 366 that can move between an open position (when the camera is disposed therethrough) and a closed position (when the camera is not present) such that the closed walls 366 establish a fluidic seal. According to one implementation, the seal walls 366 are urged closed by the higher gas pressure inside the target cavity of the patient, thereby reducing or preventing leakage or loss of air pressure as a result. Alternatively, the second seal 360 can be any seal that can receive a camera therethrough and establish a fluidic seal when the camera is not present.
Continuing with
In use, the seal package 356 allows for the camera 344 to be inserted or removed at any time, including during a procedure, without risking loss of insufflation. That is, the first seal 358 maintains a fluidic seal while the camera 344 is present (such as shown in
It is understood that the seal structure 346 embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can be incorporated into any nest embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, it is also understood that any other known seal mechanisms or structures can be used to establish a fluidic seal within any nest embodiment for receiving any camera embodiment herein.
Returning to the coupling of the nest 346 to the proximal end of the device body 342,
Thus, as the nest 346 is urged downward toward the male connector 400, the latches 380A, 380B are aligned with the V-shaped slots (including the slot 402), as best shown in
When the nest 346 is coupled to the device body 342 as described herein, the latches 380A, 380B are releasably locked to the male connector 400 as described above. Thus, in order to remove the nest 346, a user must reverse the process described above by pressing both buttons 348 on the latches 380A, 380B, thereby urging the distal ends of the latches 380A, 380B radially inwardly such that the nest latching surfaces 394 are no longer in contact with the upper walls 406. As such, once the buttons 348 are depressed far enough, the latches 380A, 380B release and the nest 346 can be urged proximally off of the proximal end of the device body 342, thereby removing the nest from the device 340.
It is understood that the latch 380A, 380B embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can be incorporated into any nest embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein, and can be used to couple to any device body disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, it is also understood that any other known attachment mechanisms can be used to removably couple any nest embodiment herein to any device body herein.
As shown in
Continuing with
Insertion of a camera 150 into the nest 346 (and thus the device 340) and the resulting interaction with the camera latch mechanism 420 will now be described with respect to
It is understood that the camera coupling mechanism 420 embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can be incorporated into any nest embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein, and can be used to couple to camera embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, it is also understood that any other known camera coupling mechanisms can be used to removably couple any camera embodiment herein to any device body herein.
As mentioned above, the nest 346 also has a presence detection mechanism 422 that will now be described in detail with respect to
According to one embodiment, the presence detection mechanism 422 can detect three different configurations: (1) the presence of the fully installed camera (such as camera 150), (2) the proper coupling of the nest 346 to the device body 342, and (3) actuation of the camera release button 428 by a user. Each of these will be described in turn below.
Alternatively, the magnet 446 need not be a magnet. Instead, the component at the end of the lever 440 can be any sensor component or sensor detectable component that can interact with the sensor 450 to indicate whether that end of the lever 440 is in contact (or close proximity) with the sensor 450 or is not in proximity with the sensor 450. For example, both the component 446 and the sensor 450 can be sensors that can sense the presence of the other sensor. Alternatively, the component 446 and the sensor 450 can be any types of mechanisms that provide for sensing the presence or absence of that end of the lever 440.
It is understood that the presence detection mechanism embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein can be incorporated into any nest embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, it is also understood that any other known presence detection mechanisms can be used in any nest embodiment herein to detect the presence of any camera embodiment herein.
It is understood that the various nest embodiments disclosed or contemplated herein are not limited to the specific coupling and uncoupling mechanisms, sensors, etc. as described above with respect to the exemplary nest embodiment described herein. It is understood that other known mechanisms or components that can accomplish the same results can be incorporated herein.
In one implementation, the various device embodiments herein can have fluidic seals at all potential fluid entry points in the device, thereby reducing or eliminating the risk of fluid entering any of the internal areas or components of the device. For example, in one embodiment, each of the robotic arms in the device can have fluidic seals disposed at certain locations within the arms to reduce or prevent fluidic access to the internal portions of the arms. In addition, the arms can also have a flexible protective sleeve disposed around the arms as discussed above. The sleeve at one end is attached at the distal end of the elongate device body and at the other end is attached at the distal end of the forearm of each arm.
One exemplary forearm 460 with appropriate fluidic seals is depicted in
The fluidic seals 466, 468 establish a fluidic seal between the tool lumen 462 and the internal areas and components of the forearm body 470. More specifically, each of the fluidic seals 466, 468 prevent fluid ingress while still allowing the tool lumen body 474 to rotate relative to the forearm body 470. The distal seal 466 establishes a fluidic seal between the tool lumen 462 and the protective sleeve 472, as mentioned above, while the proximal 468 seal establishes a fluidic seal between the tool lumen 462 and the internal portions of the body 470, thereby preventing fluids that enter the lumen 462 from accessing the internal portions of the body 470. As such, the two seals 466, 468 in combination with the protective sleeve 472 and the rest of the distal seal assembly discussed above prevent fluid from entering the forearm body 470 even if an end effector (not shown) is not present in the tool lumen 462.
As shown in
As shown in
It is understood that the fluidic seals as disclosed or contemplated herein can be incorporated into any device embodiment disclosed or contemplated herein. Further, it is also understood that any other known seal mechanisms can be used and positioned in any known fashion in any device embodiment herein to establish a fluidic seal for any device embodiment herein.
Although the various inventions have been described with reference to preferred embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 62/789,029, filed Jan. 7, 2019 and entitled “Robotically Assisted Surgical System,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2858947 | Chapman, Jr. | Nov 1958 | A |
3817403 | Glachet et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3870264 | Robinson | Mar 1975 | A |
3922930 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3971266 | Inakura et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3989952 | Timberlake et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4246661 | Pinson | Jan 1981 | A |
4258716 | Sutherland | Mar 1981 | A |
4278077 | Mizumoto | Jul 1981 | A |
4353677 | Susnjara et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4538594 | Boebel et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4568311 | Miyaki | Feb 1986 | A |
4576545 | Maeda | Mar 1986 | A |
4623183 | Aomori | Nov 1986 | A |
4636138 | Gorman | Jan 1987 | A |
4645409 | Gorman | Feb 1987 | A |
4684313 | Minematsu et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4736645 | Zimmer | Apr 1988 | A |
4762455 | Coughlan et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4771652 | Zimmer | Sep 1988 | A |
4852391 | Ruch et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4854808 | Bisiach | Aug 1989 | A |
4896015 | Taboada et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897014 | Tietze | Jan 1990 | A |
4922755 | Oshiro et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922782 | Kawai | May 1990 | A |
4984959 | Kato | Jan 1991 | A |
4990050 | Tsuge et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5019968 | Wang et al. | May 1991 | A |
5036724 | Rosheim | Aug 1991 | A |
5108140 | Bartholet | Apr 1992 | A |
5172639 | Wiesman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176649 | Wakabayashi | Jan 1993 | A |
5178032 | Zona et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5187032 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5187796 | Wang et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195388 | Zona et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201325 | McEwen et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217003 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5263382 | Brooks et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271384 | McEwen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284096 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297443 | Wentz | Mar 1994 | A |
5297536 | Wilk | Mar 1994 | A |
5304899 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305653 | Ohtani et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307447 | Asano et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5353807 | DeMarco | Oct 1994 | A |
5363935 | Schempf et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372147 | Lathrop, Jr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382885 | Salcudean et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5441494 | Oritz | Jan 1995 | A |
5388528 | Pelrine et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5397323 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5436542 | Petelin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5456673 | Ziegler | Oct 1995 | A |
5458131 | Wilk | Oct 1995 | A |
5458583 | McNeely et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458598 | Feinberg et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471515 | Fossum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5515478 | Wang | May 1996 | A |
5524180 | Wang et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5553198 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
5588442 | Scovil et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5620417 | Jang et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623582 | Rosenberg | Apr 1997 | A |
5624380 | Takayama et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624398 | Smith et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5632761 | Smith et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645520 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657429 | Wang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657584 | Hamlin | Aug 1997 | A |
5667354 | Nakazawa | Sep 1997 | A |
5672168 | de la Torre et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674030 | Sigel | Oct 1997 | A |
5728599 | Rosteker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736821 | Suyama et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754741 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762458 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769640 | Jacobus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5791231 | Cohn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797538 | Heaton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807377 | Madhani et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808665 | Green | Sep 1998 | A |
5815640 | Wang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825982 | Wright et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833656 | Smith et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841950 | Wang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845646 | Lemelson | Dec 1998 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878193 | Wang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878783 | Smart | Mar 1999 | A |
5895377 | Smith et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895417 | Pomeranz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906591 | Dario et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907664 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910129 | Koblish et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911036 | Wright et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5954692 | Smith et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971976 | Wang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993467 | Yoon | Nov 1999 | A |
6001108 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007550 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6030365 | Laufer | Feb 2000 | A |
6031371 | Smart | Feb 2000 | A |
6058323 | Lemelson | May 2000 | A |
6063095 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066090 | Yoon | May 2000 | A |
6086529 | Arndt | Jul 2000 | A |
6102850 | Wang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106521 | Blewett et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107795 | Smart | Aug 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6132441 | Grace | Oct 2000 | A |
6139563 | Cosgrove, III et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6156006 | Brosens et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159146 | El Gazayerli | Dec 2000 | A |
6162171 | Ng et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
D438617 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6206903 | Ramans | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D441076 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2001 | S |
6223100 | Green | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D441862 | Cooper et al. | May 2001 | S |
6238415 | Sepetka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240312 | Alfano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241730 | Alby | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244809 | Wang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D444555 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
6286514 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292678 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293282 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296635 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309397 | Julian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309403 | Minor et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321106 | Lemelson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327492 | Lemelson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tiemey et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346072 | Cooper | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352503 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364888 | Niemeyer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398726 | Ramans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6400980 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408224 | Lemelson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432112 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441577 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6450104 | Grant et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450992 | Cassidy, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451027 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454758 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463361 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468203 | Belson | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468265 | Evans et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470236 | Ohtsuki | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6491691 | Morley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Nemeyer et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493608 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496099 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497651 | Kan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508413 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512345 | Borenstein | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522906 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544276 | Azizi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548982 | Papanikolopoulos et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554790 | Moll | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565554 | Niemeyer | May 2003 | B1 |
6574355 | Green | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587750 | Gerbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591239 | McCall et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594552 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610007 | Belson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620173 | Gerbi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642836 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645196 | Nixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646541 | Wang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648814 | Kim et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6659939 | Moll et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661571 | Shioda et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676684 | Morley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684129 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6685698 | Morley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687571 | Byme et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692485 | Brock et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699177 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6699235 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702734 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702805 | Stuart | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714839 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714841 | Wright et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719684 | Kim et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720988 | Gere et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726699 | Wright et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728599 | Wright et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730021 | Vassiliades, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6731988 | Green | May 2004 | B1 |
6746443 | Morley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764441 | Chiel et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764445 | Ramans et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766204 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770081 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774597 | Borenstein | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6776165 | Jin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780184 | Tanrisever | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783524 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785593 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788018 | Blumenkranz | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792663 | Krzyzanowski | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793653 | Sanchez et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799065 | Niemeyer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799088 | Wang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801325 | Farr et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804581 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810281 | Brock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817972 | Snow | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817975 | Farr et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6820653 | Schempf et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6824508 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824510 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826977 | Grover et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832988 | Sprout | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832996 | Woloszko et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836703 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837846 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837883 | Moll et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839612 | Sanchez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840938 | Morley et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6843793 | Brock et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852107 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853879 | Sunaoshi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858003 | Evans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860346 | Burt et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6860877 | Sanchez et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6866671 | Tiemey et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870343 | Borenstein et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871117 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871563 | Choset et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879880 | Nowlin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892112 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899705 | Niemeyer | May 2005 | B2 |
6902560 | Morley et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6905460 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6905491 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911916 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917176 | Schempf et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933695 | Blumenkranz | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936001 | Snow | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936003 | Iddan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936042 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943663 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949096 | Davison et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951535 | Ghodoussi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963792 | Green | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965812 | Wang et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974411 | Belson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974449 | Niemeyer | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979423 | Moll | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984203 | Tartaglia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984205 | Gazdzinski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991627 | Madhani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993413 | Sunaoshi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994703 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6994708 | Manzo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997908 | Carrillo, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999852 | Green | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025064 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027892 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033344 | Imran | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039453 | Mullick | May 2006 | B2 |
7042184 | Oleynikov et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048745 | Tierney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053752 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063682 | Whayne et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7066879 | Fowler et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066926 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7074179 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077446 | Kameda et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083571 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083615 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087049 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097640 | Wang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105000 | McBrayer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107090 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109678 | Kraus et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118582 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7121781 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125403 | Julian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126303 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147650 | Lee | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155315 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155316 | Sutherland et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163525 | Franer | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169141 | Brock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182025 | Ghorbel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182089 | Ries | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199545 | Oleynikov et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206626 | Quaid, III | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206627 | Abovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210364 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7214230 | Brock et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7217240 | Snow | May 2007 | B2 |
7239940 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250028 | Julian et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259652 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273488 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311107 | Harel et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7339341 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7372229 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7403836 | Aoyama | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7438702 | Hart et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447537 | Funda et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7492116 | Oleynikov et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7566300 | Devierre et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574250 | Niemeyer | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7637905 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645230 | Mikkaichi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655004 | Long | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670329 | Flaherty et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678043 | Gilad | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7731727 | Sauer | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734375 | Buehler et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762825 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7772796 | Farritor et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785251 | Wilk | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785294 | Hueil et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785333 | Miyamoto et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789825 | Nobis et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7789861 | Franer | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7794494 | Sahatjian et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7865266 | Moll et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7960935 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979157 | Anvari | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8021358 | Doyle et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8179073 | Farritor et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8231610 | Jo et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8343171 | Farritor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8353897 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377045 | Schena | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8430851 | McGinley | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8604742 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8636686 | Minnelli et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8679096 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8827337 | Murata et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828024 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8834488 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8864652 | Diolaiti et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8888687 | Ostrovsky et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8968332 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8974440 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986196 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9010214 | Markvicka et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9060781 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9089256 | Tognaccini et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9089353 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9138129 | Diolaiti | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9198728 | Wang et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9516996 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9579088 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9649020 | Finlay | May 2017 | B2 |
9717563 | Tognaccini et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9743987 | Farritor et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9757187 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9770305 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9789608 | Itkowitz et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9814640 | Khaligh | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9816641 | Bock-Aronson et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9849586 | Rosheim | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9857786 | Cristiano | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9888966 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9956043 | Farritor et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10008017 | Itkowitz et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10111711 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10137575 | Itkowitz et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10159533 | Moll et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10220522 | Rockrohr | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10258425 | Mustufa et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10307199 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10342561 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10368952 | Tognaccini et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10398516 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10470828 | Markvicka et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10507066 | Dimaio et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10555775 | Hoffman et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10582973 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10695137 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10729503 | Cameron | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10737394 | Itkowitz et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10751136 | Farritor et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10751883 | Nahum | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10806538 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10966700 | Farritor et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11032125 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11298195 | Ye et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11382702 | Tognaccini et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11529201 | Mondry et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
11595242 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
20010018591 | Brock et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049497 | Kalloo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003173 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013601 | Nobles et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026186 | Woloszko et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020038077 | de la Torre et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065507 | Zando-Azizi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091374 | Cooper | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103417 | Gazdzinski | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111535 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120254 | Julian et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128552 | Nowlin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140392 | Borenstein et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147487 | Sundquist et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151906 | Demarais et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156347 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171385 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173700 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020190682 | Schempf et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020810 | Takizawa et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045888 | Brock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065250 | Chiel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030089267 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092964 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097129 | Davison et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100817 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109780 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114731 | Cadeddu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135203 | Wang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139742 | Wampler et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144656 | Ocel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030159535 | Grover et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167000 | Mullick | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172871 | Scherer | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179308 | Zamorano et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181788 | Yokoi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030225479 | Waled | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229268 | Uchiyama et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229338 | Irion et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030230372 | Schmidt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024311 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034282 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034283 | Quaid | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034302 | Abovitz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050394 | Jin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070822 | Shioda et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040099175 | Perrot et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102772 | Baxter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111113 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117032 | Roth | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138552 | Harel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140786 | Borenstein | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153057 | Davison | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173116 | Ghorbel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040176664 | Iddan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215331 | Chew et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225229 | Viola | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254680 | Sunaoshi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267326 | Ocel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050014994 | Fowler et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021069 | Feuer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029978 | Oleynikov et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043583 | Killmann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049462 | Kanazawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054901 | Yoshino | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054902 | Konno | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064378 | Toly | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065400 | Banik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070850 | Albrecht | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083460 | Hattori et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050095650 | Julius et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143644 | Gilad et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154376 | Riviere et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165449 | Cadeddu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177026 | Hoeg et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050234294 | Saadat et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234435 | Layer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050272977 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283137 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288555 | Binmoeller | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288665 | Woloszko | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020272 | Gildenberg | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060046226 | Bergler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079889 | Scott | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100501 | Berkelman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119304 | Farritor et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149135 | Paz | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060152591 | Lin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155263 | Lipow | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189845 | Maahs et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195015 | Mullick et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196301 | Oleynikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060198619 | Oleynikov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241570 | Wilk | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241732 | Denker | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253109 | Chu | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258938 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258954 | Timberlake et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261770 | Kishi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032701 | Fowler et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043397 | Ocel et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055342 | Wu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080658 | Farritor et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088277 | McGinley | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088340 | Brock et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106113 | Ravo | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106317 | Shelton et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123748 | Meglan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142725 | Hardin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156019 | Arkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156211 | Ferren et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167955 | De La Menardiere et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225633 | Ferren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225634 | Ferren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241714 | Oleynikov et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244520 | Ferren et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250064 | Darois et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255273 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287884 | Schena | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004634 | Farritor et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015565 | Davison | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015566 | Livneh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021440 | Solomon | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033569 | Ferren et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045803 | Williams et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058835 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058989 | Oleynikov et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071289 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071290 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080103440 | Ferren et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109014 | de la Pena | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111513 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119870 | Williams et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132890 | Woloszko et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161804 | Rioux et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164079 | Ferren et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168639 | Otake et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183033 | Bern et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080221591 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080269557 | Marescaux et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269562 | Marescaux et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090002414 | Shibata et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012532 | Quaid et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020724 | Paffrath | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024142 | Ruiz Morales | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048612 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054909 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069821 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076536 | Rentschler et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090137952 | Ramamurthy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143787 | De La Pena | Jun 2009 | A9 |
20090163929 | Yeung et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171373 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192524 | Itkowitz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234369 | Bax et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236400 | Cole et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240246 | Devill et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247821 | Rogers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248038 | Blumenkranz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281377 | Newell et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299143 | Conlon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090305210 | Guru et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326322 | Diolaiti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010294 | Conlon et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016659 | Weitzner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016853 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026347 | Iizuka | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042097 | Newton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056863 | Dejima et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069710 | Yamatani et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069940 | Miller et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100081875 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100101346 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100130986 | Mailloux et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100139436 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185212 | Sholev | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198231 | Manzo et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204713 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245549 | Allen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250000 | Blumenkranz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262162 | Omori | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100263470 | Bannasch et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274079 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292691 | Brogna | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100301095 | Shelton, IV et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318059 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331856 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015569 | Kirschenman et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020779 | Hannaford et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110071347 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071544 | Steger et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075693 | Kuramochi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077478 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082365 | Mcgrogan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098529 | Ostrovsky et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107866 | Oka et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152615 | Schostek et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110224605 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230894 | Simaan et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237890 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238079 | Hannaford et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238080 | Ranjit et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264078 | Lipow et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270443 | Kamiya et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276046 | Heimbecker et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120016175 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029727 | Sholev | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035582 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059392 | Diolaiti | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078053 | Phee et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120109150 | Quaid et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116362 | Kieturakis | May 2012 | A1 |
20120179168 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120221147 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120253515 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130001970 | Suyama et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041360 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055560 | Nakasugi et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130125696 | Long | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131695 | Scarfogliero et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130178867 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130282023 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304084 | Beira et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325030 | Hourtash et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130325181 | Moore | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345717 | Markvicka et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130345718 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140039515 | Mondry et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140046340 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140055489 | Itkowitz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058205 | Frederick et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140100587 | Farritor et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140137687 | Nogami et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140221749 | Grant et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140232824 | Dimaio et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140276944 | Farritor et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303434 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140371762 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150051446 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150057537 | Dillon | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150157191 | Phee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150223896 | Farritor et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150297299 | Yeung et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160066999 | Forgione et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160135898 | Frederick et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160291571 | Cristiano | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160303745 | Rockrohr | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170014197 | Mccrea et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170035526 | Farritor | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170078583 | Haggerty et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170252096 | Felder et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170354470 | Farritor et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180132956 | Cameron | May 2018 | A1 |
20180153578 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180338777 | Bonadio et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190059983 | Germain | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190090965 | Farritor et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190209262 | Mustufa et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190327394 | Ramirez Luna et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200138534 | Garcia Kilroy et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200214775 | Farritor et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200330175 | Cameron | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200368915 | Itkowitz et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2918531 | Jan 2015 | CA |
102499759 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102821918 | Dec 2012 | CN |
104523309 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104582600 | Apr 2015 | CN |
104622528 | May 2015 | CN |
204337044 | May 2015 | CN |
105025826 | Nov 2015 | CN |
102010040405 | Mar 2012 | DE |
0105656 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0279591 | Aug 1988 | EP |
1354670 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2286756 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2286756 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2329787 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2563261 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2684528 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2123225 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2815705 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2881046 | Oct 2015 | EP |
2937047 | Oct 2015 | EP |
S59059371 | Apr 1984 | JP |
S61165061 | Jul 1986 | JP |
S62068293 | Mar 1987 | JP |
H04144533 | May 1992 | JP |
05-115425 | May 1993 | JP |
2006508049 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H06507809 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H06508049 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07-016235 | Jan 1995 | JP |
07-136173 | May 1995 | JP |
7306155 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08-224248 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2001500510 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001505810 | May 2001 | JP |
2002000524 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003220065 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004144533 | May 2004 | JP |
2004-180781 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004283940 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004322310 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004329292 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006507809 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2009106606 | May 2009 | JP |
2009297809 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010533045 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010536436 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011504794 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011045500 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011115591 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2012504017 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012176489 | Sep 2012 | JP |
5418704 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2015526171 | Sep 2015 | JP |
2016213937 | Dec 2016 | JP |
2017113837 | Jun 2017 | JP |
199221291 | May 1991 | WO |
2001089405 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2002082979 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2002100256 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2005009211 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005044095 | May 2005 | WO |
2006052927 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006005075 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006079108 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006079108 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007011654 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007111571 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007149559 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2009014917 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009023851 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009144729 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009158164 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010039394 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010042611 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010046823 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010050771 | May 2010 | WO |
2010083480 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011075693 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011118646 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011135503 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011163520 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2013009887 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013052137 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013106569 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2014011238 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014025399 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014144220 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014146090 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015009949 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015031777 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015088655 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2016077478 | May 2016 | WO |
2017024081 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017064303 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017201310 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018045036 | Mar 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Franzino, “The Laprotek Surgical System and the Next Generation of Robotics,” Surg Clin North Am, 2003 83(6): 1317-1320. |
Franklin et al., “Prospective Comparison of Open vs. Laparoscopic Colon Surgery for Carcinoma: Five-Year Results,” Dis Colon Rectum, 1996; 39: S35-S46. |
Flynn et al, “Tomorrow's surgery: micromotors and microrobots for minimally invasive procedures,” Minimally Invasive Surgery & Allied Technologies, 1998; 7(4): 343-352. |
Fireman et al., “Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's desease with wireless capsule endoscopy,” Gut 2003; 52: 390-392. |
Fearing et al., “Wing Transmission for a Micromechanical Flying Insect,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference to Robotics & Automation, Apr. 2000; 1509-1516. |
Faraz et al., “Engineering Approaches to Mechanical and Robotic Design for Minimaly Invasive Surgery (MIS),” Kluwer Academic Publishers (Boston), 2000, 13pp. |
Falcone et al., “Robotic Surgery,” Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 46(1): 37-43. |
Fraulob et al., “Miniature assistance module for robot-assisted heart surgery,” Biomed. Tech. 2002, 47 Suppl. 1, Pt. 1: 12-15. |
Fukuda et al., “Mechanism and Swimming Experiment of Micro Mobile Robot in Water,” Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994: 814-819. |
Fukuda et al., “Micro Active Catheter System with Multi Degrees of Freedom,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1994, pp. 2290-2295. |
Fuller et al., “Laparoscopic Trocar Injuries: A Report from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical Products (STAMP) Committe,” U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration, available at http://www.fdaJ:?;ov, Finalized: Nov. 7, 2003; Updated: Jun. 24, 2005, 11 pp. |
Dumpert et al., “Improving in Vivo Robot Visioin Quality,” from the Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Realtiy, Long Beach, CA, Jan. 26-29, 2005. 1 pg. |
Dakin et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems,” Surg Endosc., 2003; 17: 574-579. |
Cuschieri, “Technology for Minimal Access Surgery,” BMJ, 1999, 319: 1-6. |
Grady, “Doctors Try New Surgery for Gallbladder Removal,” The New York Times, Apr. 20, 2007, 3 pp. |
Choi et al., “Flexure-based Manipulator for Active Handheld Microsurgical Instrument,” Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), Sep. 2005, 4pp. |
Chanthasopeephan et al., (2003), “Measuring Forces in Liver Cutting: New Equipment and Experimenal Results,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31: 1372-1382. |
Cavusoglu et al., “Robotics for Telesurgery: Second Generation Berkeley/UCSF Laparoscopic Telesurgical Workstation and Looking Towards the Future Applications,” Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2003; 30(1): 22-29. |
Guber et al., “Miniaturized Instrument Systems for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Therapy,” Biomedizinische Technic. 2002, Band 47, Erganmngsband 1: 198-201. |
Abbott et al., “Design of an Endoluminal NOTES Robotic System,” from the Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robot Systems, San Diego, CA, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007, pp. 410-416. |
Allendorf et al., “Postoperative Immune Function Varies Inversely with the Degree of Surgical Trauma in a Murine Model,” Surgical Endoscopy 1997; 11:427-430. |
Ang, “Active Tremor Compensation in Handheld Instrument for Microsurgery,” Doctoral Dissertation, tech report Cmu- RI-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon Unviersity, May 2004, 167pp. |
Atmel 80C5X2 Core, http://www.atmel.com, 2006, 186pp. |
Bailey et al., “Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Quality Medical Publishers, Inc., 1995, 25pp. |
Ballantyne, “Robotic Surgery, Telerobotic Surgery, Telepresence, and Telementoring,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2002; 16: 1389-1402. |
Bauer et al., “Case Report: Remote Percutaneous Renal Percutaneous Renal Access Using a New Automated Telesurgical Robotic System,” Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2001; (4): 341-347. |
Begos et al., “Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: From Gimmick to Gold Standard,” J Clin Gastroenterol, 1994; 19(4): 325-330. |
Berg et al., “Surgery with Cooperative Robots,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007, 1 pg. |
Breda et al., “Future developments and perspectives in laparoscopy,” Eur. Urology 2001; 40(1): 84-91. |
Breedveld et al., “Design of Steerable Endoscopes to Improve the Visual Perception of Depth During Laparoscopic Surgery,” ASME, Jan. 2004; vol. 126, pp. 1-5. |
Breedveld et al., “Locomotion through the Intestine by means of Rolling Stents,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2004, pp. 1-7. |
Calafiore et al., Multiple Arterial Conduits Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Early Angiographic Results,: Ann Thorac Surg, 1999; 67: 450-456. |
Camarillo et al., “Robotic Technology in Surgery: Past, Present and Future,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2004; 188: 28-15. |
Cavusoglu et al., “Telesurgery and Surgical Simulation: Haptic Interfaces to Real and Virtual Surgical Environments,” In Mclaughlin, M.L., Hespanha, J.P., and Sukhatme, G., editors. Touch in virtual environments, IMSC Series in Multimedia 2001, 28pp. |
Dumpert et al., “Stereoscopic In Vivo Surgical Robots,” IEEE Sensors Special Issue on In Vivo Sensors for Medicine, Jan. 2007, 10 pp. |
Green, “Telepresence Surgery”, Jan. 1, 1995, Publisher: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. |
Cleary et al., “State of the Art in Surgical Rootics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges”, “Computer Aided Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 312-328, vol. 6. |
Stoianovici et al., “Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery”, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 1-17. |
Lehman et al., Dexterous miniature in vivo robot for NOTES, 2009, IEEE, p. 244-249. |
Mihelj et al., ARMin II—7 DoF rehabilitation robot: mechanics and kinematics, 2007, IEEE, p. 4120-4125. |
Zhang et al., Cooperative robotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery: CoBRASurge, 2009, IEEE, p. 5540-5545. |
Abbou et al., “Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy with a Remote Controlled Robot,” The Journal of Urology, Jun. 2001; 165: 1964-1966. |
Albers et al., Design and development process of a humanoid robot upper body through experimentation, 2004, IEEE, p. 77-92 (Year: 2004). |
Crystal Eyes, http://www.reald.com, 2007 (Stereo 3D visualization for CAVEs, theaters and immersive environments), 1 pg. |
Definition of Individually. Dictionary.com, retrieved on Aug. 9, 2016; Retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/individually>, 1 page. |
Glukhovsky et al., “The development and application of wireless capsule endoscopy,” Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surgery, 2004; 1(1): 114-123. |
Gong et al., “Wireless endoscopy,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 51 (6): 725-729. |
Gopura et al., Mechanical designs of active upper-limb exoskeleton robots: State-of-the-art and design difficulties, 2009, IEEE, p. 178-187 (Year: 2009). |
Gopura et al., A brief review on upper extremity robotic exoskeleton systems, 2011, IEEE, p. 346-351 (Year: 2011). |
Guo et al., “Micro Active Guide Wire Catheter System—Characteristic Evaluation, Electrical Model* and Operability Evaluation of Micro Active Catheter,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1996; 2226-2231. |
Guo et al., “Fish-like Underwater Microrobot with 3 DOF,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002; 738-743. |
Hanly et al., “Robotic Abdominal Surgery,” The American Journal of Surgery, 2004; 188 (Suppl. to Oct. 1994); 19S-26S. |
Hanly et al., “Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2004; 19(4): 477-483. |
Heikkinen et al., “Comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication two years after operation: A prospective randomized trial,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14:1019-1023. |
Hissink, “Olympus Medical develops capsule camera technology,” Dec. 2004, accessed Aug. 29, 2007, http://www.letsgodigital.org, 3 pp. |
Horgan et al., “Technical Report: Robots in Laparoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2001; 11(6): 415-419. |
Ishiyama et al., “Spiral-type Micro-machine for Medical Applications,” 2000 International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, 2000; 65-69. |
Jagannath et al., “Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61 (3): 449-453. |
Kalloo et al., “Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004; 60(1): 114-117. |
Kang et al., “Robotic Assistants Aid Surgeons During Minimally Invasive Procedures,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Jan.-Feb. 2001: 94-104. |
Kantsevoy et al., “Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2006; 20: 522-525. |
Kantsevoy et al., “Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 62(2): 287-292. |
Kazemier et al. (1998), “Vascular Injuries During Laparoscopy,” J. Am. Coli. Surg. 186(5): 604-5. |
Keller et al., Design of the pediatric arm rehabilitation robot ChARMin, 2014, IEEE, p. 530-535 (Year: 2014). |
Kim, “Early Experience with Telemanipulative Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using da Vinci,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1): 33-40. |
Ko et al., “Per-Oral transgastric abdominal surgery,” Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2006; 7: 67-70. |
Lafullarde et al., “Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Five-year Results and Beyond,” Arch/Surg, Feb. 2001; 136: 180-184. |
Leggett et al. (2002), “Aortic injury during laparoscopic Fundoplication,” Surg. Endoscopy 16(2): 362. |
Li et al. (2000), “Microvascular Anastomoses Performed in Rats Using a Microsurgical Telemanipulator,” Comp. Aid. Surg., 5: 326-332. |
Liem et al., “Comparison of Conventional Anterior Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal-hernia Repair,” New England Journal of Medicine, 1997; 336 (22):1541-1547. |
Lou Cubrich, “A Four-DOF Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site Platform for Rapidly-Developing Next Generation Surgical Robotics”, Journal of Medical Robotics Research, vol. 1, No. 4, 2016, 165006-1-165006-15. |
Macfarlane et al., “Force-Feedback Grasper Helps Restore the Sense of Touch in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 1999; 3: 278-285. |
Mack et al., “Present Role of Thoracoscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of the Chest,” Ann Thorac Surgery, 1992; 54: 403-409. |
Mack, “Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery,” JAMA, Feb. 2001; 285(5): 568-572. |
Mei et al., “Wireless Drive and Control of a Swimming Microrobot,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 2002: 1131-1136. |
Menciassi et al., “Robotic Solutions and Mechanisms for a Semi-Autonomous Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002; 1379-1384. |
Melvin et al., “Computer-Enhanced vs. Standard Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery,” J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 11-16. |
Leggedmenciassi et al., “Locomotion of a Legged Capsule in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Theoretical Study and Preliminary Technological Results,” IEEE Int. Conf. on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, San Francisco, CA, pp. 2767-2770, Sep. 2004. |
Menciassi et al., “Shape memory alloy clamping devices of a capsule for monitoring tasks in the gastrointestinal tract,” J. Micromech. Microeng, 2005; 15: 2045-2055. |
Meron, “The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 52 6: 817-819. |
Micron, http://www.micron.com, 2006, ¼-inch VGA NTSC/PAL CMOS Digital Image Sensor, 98 pp. |
Midday Jeff et al., “Material Handling System for Robotic natural Orifice Surgery,”, Proceedings of the 2011 Design of medical Devices Conference, Apr. 12-14, 2011, Minneapolis, MN 4 pages. |
Miller, Ph.D., et al., “In-Vivo Stereoscopic Imaging System with 5 Degrees-of-Freedom for Minimal Access Surgery,” Dept. of Computer Science and Dept. of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, 7 pp., 2004. |
Munro (2002), “Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques,” Curro Opin. Obstet. Gynecol., 14 (4): 365-74. |
Nio et al., “Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks,” Surg Endosc, 2002; 16: 412-415. |
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Improved Vision for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS), Chicago, IL, Jun. 23-26, 2004b. |
Oleynikov et al., “Miniature Robots Can Assist in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 19-4: 473-476, 2005. |
Oleynikov et al., “In Vivo Robotic Laparoscopy,” Surgical Innovation, Jun. 2005, 12(2): 177-181. |
O'Neill, “Surgeon takes new route to gallbladder,” The Oregonian, Jun. 2007; 2 pp. |
Orlando et al. (2003), “Needle and Trocar Injuries in Diagnostic Laparoscopy under Local Anesthesia: What Is the True Incidence of These Complications?” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 13(3): 181-184. |
Palm. William. “Rapid Prototyping Primer” May 1998 (revised Jul. 30, 2002) (http://www.me.psu.edu/lamancusa/rapidpro/primer/chapter2.htm), 12 pages. |
Park et al., “Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos),” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005; 61 (4): 601-606. |
Park et al., “Trocar-less Instrumentation for Laparoscopy: Magnetic Positioning of Intra-abdominal Camera and Retractor,” Ann Surg, Mar. 2007; 245(3): 379-384. |
Patronik et al., “Crawling on the Heart: A Mobile Robotic Device for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Interventions,” MICCAI, 2004, pp. 9-16. |
Patronik et al., “Development of a Tethered Epicardial Crawler for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Therapies,” IEEE, pp. 239-240, 2004. |
Patronik et al., “Preliminary evaluation of a mobile robotic device for navigation and intervention on the beating heart,” Computer Aided Surgery, 10(4): 225-232, Jul. 2005. |
Peirs et al., “A miniature manipulator for integration in a self-propelling endoscope,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2001, 92: 343-349. |
Peters, “Minimally Invasive Colectomy: Are the Potential Benefits Realized?” Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 751-756. |
Phee et al., “Development of Microrobotic Devices for Locomotion in the Human Gastrointestinal Tract,” International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Robotics and Autonomous Systems (CI RAS 2001), Nov. 28-30, (2001), Singapore, 6 pages. |
Phee et al., “Analysis and Development of Locomotion Devices for the Gastrointestinal Tract,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, No. 6, Jun. 2002: 613-616. |
Platt et al., “In Vivo Robotic Cameras can Enhance Imaging Capability During Laparoscopic Surgery,” from the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Apr. 13-16, 2005; 1 pg. |
Qian Huan et al., “Multi-joint Single-wound Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery Robot Design,” Mechanical Design and Manufacturing, May 8, 2014, pp. 134-137. |
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Mobile Surgical Robotic Task Assistance,” 1 pg. |
Rentschler et al., “Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 28th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004; pp. 1-9. |
Rentschler et al., “In Vivo Robots for Laparoscopic Surgery,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Newport Beach, CA, 2004a, 98: 316-322. |
Rentschler et al., “Toward In Vivo Mobility,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics—Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ISO Press, Long Beach, CA, 2005a, III: 397-403. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Robots Can Assist in Abdominal Exploration,” from the Proceedings of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Scientific Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, April 13-16, 2005b. |
Rentschler et al., “Modeling, Analysis, and Experimental Study of In Vivo Wheeled Robotic Mobility,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22 (2): 308-321, 2005c. |
Rentschler et al., “Miniature in vivo robots for remote and harsh environments,” IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Jan. 2006; 12(1): pp. 66-75. |
Rentschler et al., “Mechanical Design of Robotic In Vivo Wheeled Mobility,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006a; pp. 1-11, Accepted. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Camera Robots Provide Sole Visual Feedback for Abdominal Exploration and Cholecystectomy,” Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, 20-1: 135-138, 2006b. |
Rentschler et al., “Natural Orifice Surgery with an Endoluminal Mobile Robot,” The Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Dallas, TX, April 2006d. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Biopsy and Camera Robot,” Studies in Health and Infonnatics Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, vol. 119: 449-454, IOS Press, Long Beach, CA, 2006e. |
Rentschler et al., “Mobile In Vivo Biopsy Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, Florida, May 2006; 4155-4160. |
Rentschler et al., “In vivo Robotics during the NEEMO 9 Mission,” Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Feb. 2007; 1 pg. |
Rentschler et al., “An In Vivo Mobile Robot for Surgical Vision and Task Assistance,” Journal of Medical Devices, Mar. 2007; vol. 1: 23-29. |
Riviere et al., “Toward Active Tremor Canceling in Handheld Microsurgical Instruments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Oct. 2003, 19(5): 793-800. |
Rosen et al., “Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic, Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery-Experimental Performance Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering, Oct. 1999; 46(10): 1212-1221. |
Rosen et al., “Task Decomposition of Laparoscopic Surgery for Objective Evaluation of Surgical Residents' Learning Curve Using Hidden Markov Model,” Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 7, pp. 49-61, 2002. |
Rosen et al., “The Blue DRAGON—A System of Measuring the Kinematics and the Dynamics of Minimally Invasive Surgical Tools In-Vivo,” Proc. of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 1876-1881, May 2002. |
Rosen et al., “Spherical Mechanism Analysis of a Surgical Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Analytical and Experimental Approaches,” Studies in Health Technology and Infonnatics-Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, pp. 442-448, Jan. 2005. |
Ruurda et al., “Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):41-45. |
Ruurda et al, “Robot-Assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery,” Ann R. Coll Surg Engl. 2002; 84: 223-226. |
Sackier et al., “Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 1994; 8:63-6. |
Salky, “What is the Penetration of Endoscopic Techniques into Surgical Practice?” Digestive Surgery 2000; 17:422-426. |
Satava, “Surgical Robotics: The Early Chronicles,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002; 12(1):6-16. |
Schippers et al. (1996), “Requirements and Possibilities of Computer-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery,” In: Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications, pp. 561-565. |
Schurr et al., “Robotics and Telemanipulation Technologies for Endoscopic Surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, 2000; 14:375-381. |
Schwartz, “In the Lab: Robots that Slink and Squirm,” The New York Times, Mar. 27, 2007, 4 pp. |
Sharp LL-151-3D, http://www.sharp3d.com, 2006, 2 pp. |
Slatkin et al., “The Development of a Robotic Endoscope,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 162-171, 1995. |
Smart Pill “Fastastic Voyage: Smart Pill to Expand Testing,” http://www.smartpilldiagnostics.com, Apr. 13, 2005, 1 pg. |
Sodeyama et al., A shoulder structure of muscle-driven humanoid with shoulder blades, 2005, IEEE, p. 1-6 (Year: 2005). |
Southern Surgeons Club (1991), “A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies,” N. Eng. 1 Med. 324 (16): 1073-1078. |
Stefanini et al., “Modeling and Experiments on a Legged Microrobot Locomoting in a Tubular Compliant and Slippery Environment,” Int. Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 25, No. 5-6, pp. 551-560, May-Jun. 2006. |
Stiff et al., “Long-term Pain: Less Common After Laparoscopic than Open Cholecystectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, 1994; 81: 1368-1370. |
Strong et al., “Efficacy of Novel Robotic Camera vs. a Standard Laproscopic Camera,” Surgical Innovation vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. 2005, Westminster Publications, Inc., pp. 315-318. |
Suzumori et al., “Development of Flexible Microactuator and its Applications to Robotics Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991: 1622-1627. |
Taylor et al., “A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE Eng Med Biol, 1995; 279-87. |
Tendick et al. (1993), “Sensing and Manipulation Problems in Endoscopic Surgery: Experiment, Analysis, and Observation,” Presence 2(1): 66-81. |
Tendick et al., “Applications of Micromechatronics in Minimally Invasive Surgery,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1998; 3(1): 34-42. |
Thomann et al., “The Design of a new type of Micro Robot for the Intestinal Inspection,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2002: 1385-1390. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/180,960, filed Feb. 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/956,032, filed Aug. 15, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/983,445, filed Oct. 29, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,062, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,076, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,086, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,106, filed Nov. 26, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/990,470, filed Nov. 27, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/025,346, filed Feb. 1, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,588, filed Feb. 22, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/030,617, filed Feb. 22, 2008. |
Worn et al., “Espirit Project No. 33915: Miniaturised Robot for Micro Manipulation (MINIMAN),” Nov. 1998, http://www.ipr.ira.ujka.de/-microbot/miniman. |
Way et al., editors, “Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery,” Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1995; 14 pp. |
Wolfe et al. (1991), Endoscopic Cholecystectomy: An analysis of Complications, Arch. Surg. 1991; 126: 1192-1196. |
Xu et al., “System Design of an Insertable Robotic Effector Platform for Single Access (SPA) Surgery”, The 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 11-15, 2009, St. Louis MO USA pp. 5546-5552. |
Yu, BSN, RN, “M2ATM Capsule Endoscopy A Breakthrough Diagnostic Tool for Small Intestine Imagining,” vol. 25, No. 1, 2001, Gastroenterology Nursing, pp. 24-27. |
Yu et al., “Microrobotic Cell Injection,” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 2001: 620-625. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200214775 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62789029 | Jan 2019 | US |