This disclosure relates generally to roofing and more particularly to metal roofing panels that emulate the appearance of traditional roofing materials such as slate, cedar shake, asphalt, and clay barrel roofing.
Metal roofing has seen a resurgence in recent years because, among other things, of its durability, resistance to embers, and long life expectancy. Traditional metal roofing such as standing seam roofing in which long panels are attached to a roof extending from the ridge to the eave has been used for many years. In addition to this traditional metal roofing, metal roofing panels that are coated and embossed to resemble more traditional roofing materials such as slate or barrel roofing are in vogue. In the past, such roofing panels have not convincingly mimicked the look of the traditional roofing material they are meant to emulate and some can be downright cheesy looking to an observer. In addition, prior art metal roofing panels have often exhibited shortcomings in their resistance to leakage, particularly in a blowing rain or snow storm. Finally, some prior art metal roofing panels are attached with exposed nails or other fasteners, which can rust or otherwise deteriorate over time. A need exists for metal roofing panels that offer better aesthetic emulation of traditional roofing materials, better resistance to leakage in storms, and that are attached with hidden fasteners that are not exposed to the elements. It is to the provision of metal roofing panels that meet these and other needs that the present invention is primarily directed.
Briefly described, a roofing panel, which preferably but not necessarily is made of metal sheet, is printed or coated with graphics and embossed or pressed to emulate better the appearance of traditional roofing materials when installed in courses on a roof. One embodiment emulates the appearance of traditional architectural asphalt shingles. Another emulates the appearance of a cedar shake shingled roof while yet another embodiment emulates the appearance of a slate roof. Another disclosed embodiment emulates better the appearance of clay barrel shingles and a roof covered with clay barrel shingles. The panels of this embodiment can be installed in unique patterns not possible with traditional clay barrel shingles. When installed on a roof, the panels overlap in a shiplap fashion at their ends in such a way that the aesthetic features of the panels form a water dam preventing migration of water through the end connections of the panels. A clipping interlock system along the forward and rear edges of the panels makes installation simple, secure, virtually fool proof, and virtually leak proof.
These and other aspects, features, and advantages of the invention disclosed herein through exemplary embodiments will become more apparent to one of skill in the art upon review of the detailed description set forth below taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures, which are briefly described as follows.
Reference will now be had in more detail to the annexed drawing figures, wherein like reference numerals, where appropriate, indicate like parts throughout the several views. The panels in the figures will be described for simplicity as being made of metal sheets. It will be understood, however, that this is not a limitation of the invention and the panels can be made of any other appropriate material such as a polymeric material, TCP, PVC, or any other sufficiently malleable and weather resistant material, all of which are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
The headlap portion 25 is characterized by an elongated slot 21 that is configured to receive and interlock with the leading edge clip 22 of a like panel in a next higher course of panels. The details of this interlocking clipping system will be described in more detail below. The headlap portion is notched or truncated at one end as indicated by reference numeral 23 in
In the embodiment of
When two panels are installed end-to-end with the second end 17 of one panel overlapping the first end 16 of the adjacent panel, the water barriers 26 formed by the aesthetic features on the first end prevent rainwater and snow from blowing underneath the overlap to the butt joint, from where it can leak onto the roof deck below. Further, forming the water barriers 26 as part of the pressed aesthetic design itself eliminates the need for a separate butt end fastening system and simplifies installation of the roofing panels on a roof deck. In
With continued reference to
Referring to
In the overlapped area, the barriers to water infiltration in this embodiment also are created by the ridges and valleys within the shake section beneath the overlapped panel. The depressed flat areas 39 emulating spaces preferably are of uniform width, while the widths of the individual raised shake sections can be different from each other and unique. The top surfaces of the shake sections are formed with variegated surface geometries including valleys, ridges, and other organic features typical of hand cut cedar shakes. The virtual plane of these features tapers from the leading edge of each course of shakes to the trailing edge of the course, thus simulating the wedge shape and overlapping arrangement of traditional cedar shake shingles.
The second end 57 of the panel 52 is configured to overlap the first end 56 by the width of the truncated section during installation of panels on a roof. In this regard, the embossed portion at the overlapping second end 57 is identical to the embossed portion at the first end 56 that it will overlap. This ensures a better fitting and a tighter overlap that is virtually seamless on a roof. The depressed or flat space 64 adjacent the first end 56 of the panel forms a water dam to impede the infiltration of water between the panels in the shiplapped region. During installation, panels are installed end-to-end in one course and the next higher course is installed with its clips interlocked with the slots of the lower course of panels. The result is a roof that closely emulates in appearance a traditional slate tile shingled roof.
Only a single course of slate tiles is included in the panel of the embodiment of
In the overlapping area of two end-to-end panels of this embodiment, the second or overlapping end of one panel extends beyond the centerline of the barrel section of the underlying panel. This is perhaps best illustrated in
To emulate better the effect of overlapping tiles, the front face of each course of embossed barrels is larger than at the rear surface of the barrel section by the thickness of the desired barrel tile being emulated. Further, the side edges of each barrel section are tapered to ensure that the resulting visual effect is that of a full tile. Additionally, there is a vertical step on the side edges, which creates the visual effect of the edge thickness of a real barrel tile. The inter-barrel area (space between raised barrel sections) also includes geometry that lofts from a downwardly curved shape at the leading edge of the panel to a flat surface that intercepts the headlap area 75. This creates the visual effect of having an overturned clay barrel tile underneath and spanning the distance between the two adjacent raised barrel sections while maintaining the thickness expected for such a tile.
During installation, a course of roofing panels is installed with the panels of the course arranged in end-to-end overlapping relationship as described above. Each panel is attached to the roof deck with nails 144 driven through the nailing flange 140 and into the roof deck. Panels of the next higher course are positioned with their clipping features aligned with the openings of the slots 150. Their leading edges are then pressed downwardly toward the deck until the return flanges of the clipping features snap into the slots and lodge beneath the tongues 145. The clipping features thus become interlocked within the slots and the slots and clipping features form a substantially impenetrable barrier to rainwater that might otherwise seep between courses of panels. Of course, many other configurations of the clipping interlocking system may be substituted by the skilled artisan and all are intended to be within the scope of the present invention.
The invention has been described herein in terms of preferred embodiments and methodologies considered by the inventors to represent the best modes of carrying out the invention. Clearly, however, many additions, deletions, and modifications, both subtle and gross, might well be made to the illustrated embodiments by skilled artisans without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention embodied therein. For example, while pressed and/or embossed metal panels have been described, the panels also could be vacuum molded from sheets of PVC or other polymeric material. The specific designs of the aesthetic fields presented above are not limiting and many other architectural designs may also be eliminated, including other traditional shingle designs and new designs not previously used on roofs. Thus, the scope of the invention is not limited by the exemplary embodiments described herein but is circumscribed only by the claims hereof.
Priority is hereby claimed to the benefit of the filing date of U.S. provisional patent application No. 62/112,016 filed on Feb. 4, 2015, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
393516 | Packer | Nov 1888 | A |
550325 | Kinnear | Nov 1895 | A |
622417 | Cohen | Apr 1899 | A |
D51438 | Caron | Oct 1917 | S |
1473275 | Burgett | Nov 1923 | A |
1743206 | Fulenwider | Jan 1930 | A |
1811385 | Dietz | Jun 1931 | A |
D93731 | Cahill | May 1935 | S |
2005219 | Burriss | Jun 1935 | A |
2042890 | Fulenwider | Jun 1936 | A |
D105276 | Hauck | Jul 1937 | S |
2685852 | Godel | Aug 1954 | A |
D203566 | Hayes | Jan 1966 | S |
D209719 | Ellis, Sr. | Dec 1967 | S |
3583117 | Roach | Jun 1971 | A |
3608261 | French | Sep 1971 | A |
3643392 | Martinez | Feb 1972 | A |
3968610 | Medow | Jul 1976 | A |
3977141 | Peters | Aug 1976 | A |
4010590 | Reinke | Mar 1977 | A |
4079561 | Vallee | Mar 1978 | A |
D253724 | Yanoh | Dec 1979 | S |
D256953 | Morita | Sep 1980 | S |
D256954 | Morita | Sep 1980 | S |
D263256 | Morse | Mar 1982 | S |
4343126 | Hoofe, III | Aug 1982 | A |
D275325 | Gustavsson | Aug 1984 | S |
4588443 | Bache | May 1986 | A |
4890432 | Shepherd | Jan 1990 | A |
4932184 | Waller | Jun 1990 | A |
5349801 | Verbofsky | Sep 1994 | A |
5423153 | Woolems | Jun 1995 | A |
5469680 | Hunt | Nov 1995 | A |
5519974 | Greenberg | May 1996 | A |
D372545 | Schultz | Aug 1996 | S |
5598677 | Rehm, III | Feb 1997 | A |
5613337 | Plath et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5651227 | Anderson | Jul 1997 | A |
D394719 | Costantini | May 1998 | S |
5752355 | Sahramaa | May 1998 | A |
D398709 | Ross | Sep 1998 | S |
5813183 | Attley | Sep 1998 | A |
D402064 | Hahn | Dec 1998 | S |
5878542 | Cornelius | Mar 1999 | A |
5878543 | Mowery | Mar 1999 | A |
D414568 | Hedges | Sep 1999 | S |
D415848 | Plath | Oct 1999 | S |
6224701 | Bryant | May 2001 | B1 |
D462129 | Sadosky, Jr. | Aug 2002 | S |
D499897 | Ricci | Dec 2004 | S |
6857239 | Sadosky, Jr. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
D507837 | King | Jul 2005 | S |
D526727 | Ross | Aug 2006 | S |
D527835 | Ross | Sep 2006 | S |
7246474 | Dombek et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
D570502 | Silverstrin | Jun 2008 | S |
D586008 | Vandewater, Jr. | Feb 2009 | S |
D587821 | Larsen | Mar 2009 | S |
D607585 | Larson | Jan 2010 | S |
D608916 | Simmons | Jan 2010 | S |
D629532 | Cornett | Dec 2010 | S |
D643133 | Steffes | Aug 2011 | S |
D708764 | Lin | Jul 2014 | S |
D714968 | Martin | Oct 2014 | S |
D727540 | Martin | Apr 2015 | S |
D729417 | Martin | May 2015 | S |
9097019 | Rasmussen | Aug 2015 | B1 |
D738541 | Tarvaran | Sep 2015 | S |
D807837 | Kayanuma et al. | Jan 2018 | S |
20020160151 | Pinault | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030131551 | Mollinger | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030192281 | Bullinger | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20070107356 | Steffes | May 2007 | A1 |
20100186334 | Seem | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110214375 | Gaudreau | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2332671 | Jul 2002 | CA |
350587 | Jan 1990 | EP |
2202245 | Sep 1988 | GB |
002202245 | Sep 1988 | GB |
2245613 | Jan 1992 | GB |
2245617 | Jan 1992 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Two photographs of metal shingles. |
Figure 2-43. Modular Metal Shingles Installed Direct-to-Deck. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160222667 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62112016 | Feb 2015 | US |