Rotary input for lever actuation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10980556
  • Patent Number
    10,980,556
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 28, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 20, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A force transmission with means for winding a first cable onto a first capstan and a second cable onto a second capstan with a first axis of rotation. The first and second cables wound such that when one of the two cables is payed out, the other of the two cables is payed in. The force transmission further includes means for passing the first and cables over an idler pulley in opposite directions. The idler pulley has a second axis of rotation substantially perpendicular to the first axis of rotation. The force transmission further includes means for coupling the first cable to a lever to rotate the lever in a first direction and means for coupling the second cable to the lever to rotate the lever in a second direction opposite the first direction, the lever having a third axis of rotation substantially parallel to the second axis of rotation.
Description
BACKGROUND
Field

Embodiments of the invention relate to the field of force transmissions; and more specifically, to force transmissions for use in surgical instruments intended for use in teleoperated minimally invasive surgeries.


Background

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (e.g., endoscopy, laparoscopy, thoracoscopy, cystoscopy, and the like) allows a patient to be operated upon through small incisions by using elongated surgical instruments introduced to an internal surgical site. Generally, a cannula is inserted through the incision to provide an access port for the surgical instruments. The surgical site often comprises a body cavity, such as the patient's abdomen. The body cavity may optionally be distended using a clear fluid such as an insufflation gas. In traditional minimally invasive surgery, the surgeon manipulates the tissues by using hand-actuated end effectors of the elongated surgical instruments while viewing the surgical site on a video monitor. In teleoperated minimally invasive surgery, the surgeon manipulates the tissues by using mechanically actuated end effectors of the elongated surgical instruments. Mechanical actuation may allow for improved control of the surgical instruments.


The mechanically actuated surgical instruments will generally have an end effector in the form of a surgical tool such as a forceps, a scissors, a clamp, a needle grasper, or the like at a distal end of an elongate tube. A flexible rod may extend from the end effector to a proximal control mechanism that pushes and pulls the rod to provide an actuating force to open and close the end effector.


Rotary actuators, such as servo motors, are an effective way to provide controlled actuation forces to the proximal control mechanism. The proximal control mechanism then translates the rotary input force into the push-pull motion needed to control the opening and closing of the end effector. The proximal control mechanism may receive many such rotary inputs, perhaps six to eight, each of which can be translated into an appropriate motion for controlling some aspect of the end effector. It is desirable that the proximal control mechanism be compact to avoiding crowding in the surgical field.


In view of the above, it is desirable to provide an improved apparatus and method for transmitting rotary actuating forces to a push-pull rod in an elongate tube of a surgical instrument intended for use in teleoperated minimally invasive surgeries.


SUMMARY

A force transmission with means for winding a first cable onto a first capstan and a second cable onto a second capstan with a first axis of rotation. The first and second cables wound such that when one of the two cables is payed out, the other of the two cables is payed in. The force transmission further includes means for passing the first and cables over an idler pulley in opposite directions. The idler pulley has a second axis of rotation substantially perpendicular to the first axis of rotation. The force transmission further includes means for coupling the first cable to a lever to rotate the lever in a first direction and means for coupling the second cable to the lever to rotate the lever in a second direction opposite the first direction, the lever having a third axis of rotation substantially parallel to the second axis of rotation.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description that follows below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention may best be understood by referring to the following description and accompanying drawings that are used to illustrate embodiments of the invention by way of example and not limitation. In the drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements:



FIG. 1 is a simplified perspective view of a teleoperated surgical system with a mechanically actuated surgical instrument inserted through a port in a patient's abdomen.



FIG. 2 is a plan view of a surgical instrument for use with a mechanically actuated manipulator.



FIG. 3 is a top view of the surgical instrument of FIG. 2 showing the input connections that connect to actuators.



FIG. 4 is a side view of the surgical instrument of FIG. 2 with portions of the housing and support structure removed to show a mechanism for driving a mechanically actuated surgical instrument.



FIG. 5A is a side view of the portion of the surgical instrument of FIG. 4.



FIG. 5B is the portion of the surgical instrument of FIG. 4 in a second position.



FIG. 6 is a side view of a portion of another surgical instrument that embodies the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.


In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and mechanical compositional, structural, electrical, and operational changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the embodiments of the present invention is defined only by the claims of the issued patent.


The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Spatially relative terms, such as “beneath”, “below”, “lower”, “above”, “upper”, and the like may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element's or feature's relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if the device in the figures is turned over, elements described as “below” or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “above” the other elements or features. Thus, the exemplary term “below” can encompass both an orientation of above and below. The device may be otherwise oriented (e.g., rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly.


As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising” specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.



FIG. 1 is a simplified diagrammatic perspective view of a teleoperated surgical system 100. The teleoperated surgical system 100 includes a support assembly 110 mounted to or near an operating table supporting a patient's body 122. The support assembly 110 supports one or more surgical instruments 120 that operate on a surgical site within the patient's body 122.


The term “instrument” is used herein to describe a device configured to be inserted into a patient's body and used to carry out surgical procedures. The instrument includes a surgical tool, such as a forceps, a needle driver, a shears, a monopolar cauterizer, a bipolar cauterizer, a tissue stabilizer or retractor, a clip applier, an anastomosis device, an imaging device (e.g., an endoscope or ultrasound probe), and the like. Some instruments used with embodiments of the invention further provide an articulated support for the surgical tool so that the position and orientation of the surgical tool can be manipulated.


The simplified perspective view of the teleoperated surgical system 100 shows only a single surgical instrument 120 to allow aspects of the invention to be more clearly seen. A functional teleoperated surgical system would further include a vision system that enables the operator to view the surgical site from outside the patient's body 122. The vision system can include a video monitor for displaying images received by an optical device provided at a distal end of one of the surgical instruments 120. The optical device can include a lens coupled to an optical fiber which carries the detected images to an imaging sensor (e.g., a CCD or CMOS sensor) outside of the patient's body 122. Alternatively, the imaging sensor may be provided at the distal end of the surgical instrument 120, and the signals produced by the sensor are transmitted along a lead or wirelessly for display on the monitor. An illustrative monitor is the stereoscopic display on the surgeon's cart in the da Vinci® Surgical System, marketed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc., of Sunnyvale Calif.


A functional teleoperated surgical system would further include a control system for controlling the insertion and articulation of the surgical instruments 120. This control may be effectuated in a variety of ways, depending on the degree of control desired, the size of the surgical assembly, and other factors. In some embodiments, the control system includes one or more manually operated input devices, such as a joystick, exoskeletal glove, or the like. These input devices control motors, such as servo motors, which, in turn, control the articulation of the surgical assembly. The forces generated by the motors are transferred via drivetrain mechanisms, which transmit the forces from the motors generated outside the patient's body 122 through an intermediate portion of the elongate surgical instrument 120 to a portion of the surgical instrument inside the patient's body 122 distal from the motor. Persons familiar with telemanipulative, teleoperative, and telepresence surgery will know of systems such as the da Vinci® Surgical System and the Zeus® system originally manufactured by Computer Motion, Inc. and various illustrative components of such systems.


The surgical instrument 120 is shown inserted through an entry guide 124, e.g., a cannula in the patient's abdomen. A functional teleoperated surgical system may provide an entry guide manipulator (not shown; in one illustrative aspect the entry guide manipulator is part of the support assembly 110) and an instrument manipulator (discussed below). The entry guide 124 is mounted onto the entry guide manipulator, which includes a mechanically actuated positioning system for positioning the distal end of the entry guide 124 at the desired target surgical site. The mechanically actuated positioning system may be provided in a variety of forms, such as a serial link arm having multiple degrees of freedom (e.g., six degrees of freedom) or a jointed arm that provides a remote center of motion (due to either hardware or software constraints) and which is positioned by one or more unpowered, lockable setup joints mounted onto a base. Alternatively, the entry guide manipulator may be manually maneuvered so as to position the entry guide 124 in the desired location. In some telesurgical embodiments, the input devices that control the manipulator(s) may be provided at a location remote from the patient (outside the room in which the patient is placed). The input signals from the input devices are then transmitted to the control system, which, in turn, manipulates the instrument manipulators 130 in response to those signals. The instrument manipulator may be coupled to the entry guide manipulator such that the instrument manipulator 130 moves in conjunction with the entry guide 124.


The surgical instrument 120 is detachably connected to the mechanically actuated instrument manipulator 130. The mechanically actuated manipulator includes a coupler 132 to transfer controller motion from the mechanically actuated manipulator to the surgical instrument 120. The instrument manipulator 130 may provide a number of controller motions which the surgical instrument 120 may translate into a variety of movements of the end effector on the surgical instrument such that the input provided by a surgeon through the control system is translated into a corresponding action by the surgical instrument.



FIG. 2 is a plan view of an illustrative embodiment of the surgical instrument 120, comprising a distal portion 250 and a proximal control mechanism 240 coupled by an elongate tube 210. The distal portion 250 of the surgical instrument 120 may provide any of a variety of surgical devices such as the forceps 258 shown, a needle driver, a cautery device, a cutting tool, an imaging device (e.g., an endoscope or ultrasound probe), or a combined device that includes a combination of two or more various tools and imaging devices. Surgical devices that provide an opening and closing motion, such as the forceps 258 shown, may be coupled to a rod that passes through the elongate tube 210 and into the proximal control mechanism 240. The proximal control mechanism translates input from an actuator to push and pull on the rod to open and close the surgical device.



FIG. 3 is a top view of the proximal control mechanism 240 for the surgical instrument of FIG. 2 showing the input connections 300 that connect to actuators (not shown). The actuators used with embodiments of the invention are rotary actuators, such as servo motors. The proximal control mechanism of the surgical instrument may provide input connections for a number of actuators with each actuator controlling one motion of the surgical tool. For example, the proximal control mechanism 240 shown provides eight input connections 300. Of course, some input connections may be unused by some surgical instruments.



FIG. 4 is a side view of the proximal control mechanism 240 for the surgical instrument of FIG. 2 with portions of the housing and support structure removed to show a mechanism for driving a mechanically actuated surgical instrument. One of the input connections 300 is fixed to an input axle 400 having an input axis about which the input connection rotates. The input axle 400 receives a rotational input from an actuator that is removably coupled to the input connection 300. A hand wheel 402 may be coupled to an opposite end of the input axle 400 from the coupler.



FIGS. 5A and 5B are side views of a portion of the surgical instrument of FIG. 2 shown in two operative positions. The portion shown provides a push-pull drive for a rod 500 that passes through the elongate tube 502 to open and close the surgical instrument. Note that only the proximal end of the elongate tube 502 is shown. The portion of the elongate tube that projects toward the surgical site is not shown.


The input axle 400 has a first axis of rotation along the length of the axle. An input connection 300 for a rotary actuator may be coupled to an end of the input axle 400. A hand wheel 402 may be coupled to an opposite end of the input axle 400 from the input connection 300. A first capstan 504 and a second capstan 506 are fixed to the input axle 400. A first cable 508 passes over an idler pulley 516 with a first end coupled to the first capstan 504 and a second end 510 coupled to a lever 518. The idler pulley 516 has a second axis of rotation substantially perpendicular to the first axis of rotation of the input axle 400. The lever 518 has a third axis of rotation 526 substantially parallel to the second axis of rotation. In another embodiment shown in FIG. 6, the first capstan 604 and the second capstan 606 are portions of a single capstan 600.


As shown in FIG. 5A, rotating the input axle 400 in a first direction 520 winds the first cable 508 onto the first capstan 504 and rotates the lever 518 in a second direction 522. As shown in FIG. 5B, rotating the input axle 400 in a third direction 530 opposite the first direction 520 winds the second cable 512 onto the second capstan 506 and rotates the lever 518 in a fourth direction 532 opposite the second direction. The first cable 508 and the second cable 512 may be portions of a single cable. The lever 518 is coupled to the rod 500 by a linkage 528 to impart a push-pull movement 524 to the rod and thereby transmit a force that can open and close an end effector at the distal end of the elongate tube 502 of a mechanically actuated surgical instrument. In an optional embodiment, a spring (not shown) may be placed between the lever and the support structure to counteract friction in the force transmission mechanism and/or to bias the movable end effector component to one position or another (e.g., grip biased open or closed).


The force transmission may use levers in various arrangements. Different classes of levers provide various advantages in terms of layout, force multiplication, and kinematic relationships. For example, the lever 518 shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B is a first class lever. The fulcrum (axis of rotation 526) is between the applied force 510, 514 and the linkage 528 that couples the load 500 to the lever 518.



FIG. 6 shows a force transmission that uses a second class lever. The linkage 628 that couples the load 500 to the lever 618 is between the applied force 510, 514 and the fulcrum (axis of rotation 626).


While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention is not limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting.

Claims
  • 1. A force transmission comprising: means for winding a first cable onto a first capstan and a second cable onto a second capstan, the first and second capstans having a first axis of rotation, the first and second cables being wound so that when one of the first and second cables is payed out, the other of the first and second cables is payed in;means for passing the first and second cables over an idler pulley in opposite directions, the idler pulley having a second axis of rotation substantially perpendicular to the first axis of rotation;means for coupling the first cable to a lever to rotate the lever in a first direction, the lever having a third axis of rotation substantially parallel to the second axis of rotation; andmeans for coupling the second cable to the lever to rotate the lever in a second direction opposite the first direction.
  • 2. The force transmission of claim 1 wherein the lever is a first class lever.
  • 3. The force transmission of claim 1 wherein the lever is a second class lever.
  • 4. The force transmission of claim 1 further comprising means for coupling the lever to close a surgical end effector when the lever is rotated in the first direction and open the surgical end effector when the lever is rotated in the second direction.
  • 5. The force transmission of claim 1 wherein the first and second cables are portions of a single cable.
  • 6. The force transmission of claim 1 wherein the first capstan and the second capstan are portions of a single capstan.
  • 7. The force transmission of claim 1 further comprising an input connection for a rotary actuator coupled to the means for winding the first cable onto the first capstan and the second cable onto the second capstan.
  • 8. The force transmission of claim 1 further comprising a hand wheel coupled to the means for winding the first cable onto the first capstan and the second cable onto the second capstan.
  • 9. A mechanically actuated surgical instrument comprising: means for winding a first cable onto a first capstan and a second cable onto a second capstan, the first and second capstans having a first axis of rotation, the first and second cables being wound so that when one of the first and second cables is payed out, the other of the first and second cables is payed in;means for passing the first and second cables over an idler pulley in opposite directions, the idler pulley having a second axis of rotation substantially perpendicular to the first axis of rotation;means for coupling the first cable to a lever to rotate the lever in a first direction, the lever having a third axis of rotation substantially parallel to the second axis of rotation;means for coupling the second cable to the lever to rotate the lever in a second direction opposite the first direction; andmeans for coupling a surgical end effector to the lever.
  • 10. The surgical instrument of claim 9 wherein the lever is a first class lever.
  • 11. The surgical instrument of claim 9 wherein the lever is a second class lever.
  • 12. The surgical instrument of claim 9 wherein the means for coupling the surgical end effector to the lever causes the surgical end effector to close when the lever is rotated in the first direction and to open when the lever is rotated in the second direction.
  • 13. The surgical instrument of claim 9 wherein the first and second cables are portions of a single cable.
  • 14. The surgical instrument of claim 9 wherein the first capstan and the second capstan are portions of a single capstan.
  • 15. The surgical instrument of claim 9 further comprising an input connection for a rotary actuator coupled to the means for winding the first cable onto the first capstan and the second cable onto the second capstan.
  • 16. The surgical instrument of claim 9 further comprising a hand wheel coupled to the means for winding the first cable onto the first capstan and the second cable onto the second capstan.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 16/121,831, filed Sep. 5, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,335,176, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/461,260, filed Aug. 15, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,076,348, which claims the benefit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/866,239, filed Aug. 15, 2013, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (96)
Number Name Date Kind
2906143 Musser Sep 1959 A
5792135 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5807377 Madhani et al. Sep 1998 A
5855583 Wang et al. Jan 1999 A
5876325 Mizuno et al. Mar 1999 A
6331181 Tierney et al. Dec 2001 B1
6394998 Wallace et al. May 2002 B1
6817974 Cooper et al. Nov 2004 B2
6994708 Manzo Feb 2006 B2
7090683 Brock et al. Aug 2006 B2
7169141 Brock et al. Jan 2007 B2
7214230 Brock et al. May 2007 B2
7331967 Lee et al. Feb 2008 B2
7338513 Lee et al. Mar 2008 B2
7608083 Lee et al. Oct 2009 B2
7935130 Williams May 2011 B2
8444631 Yeung et al. May 2013 B2
8479969 Shelton, IV Jul 2013 B2
8506555 Ruiz Morales Aug 2013 B2
8551115 Steger et al. Oct 2013 B2
8597280 Cooper et al. Dec 2013 B2
8602288 Shelton, IV et al. Dec 2013 B2
8771270 Burbank Jul 2014 B2
8800838 Shelton, IV Aug 2014 B2
8808166 Hosaka Aug 2014 B2
8992565 Brisson et al. Mar 2015 B2
9028494 Shelton, IV et al. May 2015 B2
9078684 Williams Jul 2015 B2
9204923 Manzo et al. Dec 2015 B2
9232979 Parihar et al. Jan 2016 B2
9259274 Prisco Feb 2016 B2
9533122 Weitzner et al. Jan 2017 B2
9664262 Donlon et al. May 2017 B2
9839439 Cooper Dec 2017 B2
9931106 Au et al. Apr 2018 B2
9962228 Schuh et al. May 2018 B2
10076348 Anderson Sep 2018 B2
10130366 Shelton, IV et al. Nov 2018 B2
10201365 Boudreaux et al. Feb 2019 B2
10335176 Anderson et al. Jul 2019 B2
10682141 Moore et al. Jun 2020 B2
20020111621 Wallace et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111635 Jensen et al. Aug 2002 A1
20050042943 Mocivnik et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050119527 Banik et al. Jun 2005 A1
20070043338 Moll et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070119274 Devengenzo et al. May 2007 A1
20070232858 MacNamara et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080046122 Manzo et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080065102 Cooper Mar 2008 A1
20080065105 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080087871 Schena et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103491 Omori et al. May 2008 A1
20080196533 Bergamasco et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090088774 Swarup et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090198272 Kerver et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100170519 Romo et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100175701 Reis et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100198253 Jinno et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100219388 Schena Sep 2010 A1
20100318101 Choi et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110015650 Choi et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110118754 Dachs, II et al. May 2011 A1
20110277580 Cooper et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277775 Holop et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110295269 Swensgard et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110295270 Giordano et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120123441 Au et al. May 2012 A1
20120239060 Orban, III et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120289974 Rogers et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130046318 Radgowski et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130123783 Marczyk et al. May 2013 A1
20130144395 Stefanchik et al. Jun 2013 A1
20140005678 Shelton, IV et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140100558 Schmitz et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140114327 Boudreaux et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140257333 Blumenkranz Sep 2014 A1
20140276723 Parihar et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150051034 Cooper et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150150635 Kilroy et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150157355 Price et al. Jun 2015 A1
20160058443 Yates et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160151115 Karguth et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160184034 Holop et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160184036 Solomon et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160184037 Cooper et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160296219 Srivastava et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160361049 Dachs, II et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170007345 Smith et al. Jan 2017 A1
20190125468 Adams May 2019 A1
20190231451 Lambrecht et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190239965 Abbott Aug 2019 A1
20190249759 Abbott Aug 2019 A1
20190298323 Lambrecht et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190307522 Lambrecht et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190328467 Waterbury et al. Oct 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
102327152 Jan 2012 CN
2548529 Jan 2013 EP
2783643 Oct 2014 EP
3195993 Jul 2017 EP
H06114000 Apr 1994 JP
H10249777 Sep 1998 JP
2003024336 Jan 2003 JP
2005288590 Oct 2005 JP
WO-9729690 Aug 1997 WO
WO-2012068156 May 2012 WO
WO-2015142290 Sep 2015 WO
WO-2016161449 Oct 2016 WO
WO-2016172299 Oct 2016 WO
WO-2016189284 Dec 2016 WO
WO-2017064303 Apr 2017 WO
WO-2017188851 Nov 2017 WO
WO-2018049217 Mar 2018 WO
WO-2018069679 Apr 2018 WO
WO-2018179140 Oct 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190314046 A1 Oct 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61866239 Aug 2013 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16121831 Sep 2018 US
Child 16456148 US
Parent 14461260 Aug 2014 US
Child 16121831 US