Rubber crumb is an intermittent form of an elastic polymer found during the manufacturing process of synthetic rubber. The crumb pieces are formed from either a latex suspension or polymer solution using a coagulation process. The rubber crumb may then be pressed into a block, or bale of rubber. Each bale may be about 25 kg to about 35 kg. The rubber bale may then be packaged for shipment to customers, which can include manufacturers of automotive parts, printer rollers, etc. Typically, the outer surfaces of the rubber bales are inspected by human or video inspection for appearance, including looking for contamination in the form of any material that contrasts to the routine color and tint of the finished product. Such contamination can lessen the utility of the rubber crumb and hence its value. Any contamination detected may be removed from the surface of the bale. However, because the rubber bales may not be translucent, these methods of inspection only view a limited amount of contents of each bale. For instance, less than about 5% of the contents of each bale may be inspected. It has further been found that contamination smaller than about 0.5 mm is difficult for technicians to detect visually. As such, there is a need for improved inspection system, such as inspecting the rubber crumb before it is pressed into a bale.
While the specification concludes with claims which particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention, it is believed the present invention will be better understood from the following description of certain embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals identify the same elements.
The drawings are not intended to be limiting in any way, and it is contemplated that various embodiments of the invention may be carried out in a variety of other ways, including those not necessarily depicted in the drawings. The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification illustrate several aspects of the present invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention; it being understood, however, that this invention is not limited to the precise arrangements shown.
The following description of certain embodiments of the present disclosure should not be used to limit the scope of the present disclosure. Other examples, features, aspects, embodiments, and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description. As will be realized, various aspects of the present disclosure may take alternate forms, or have alternate or additional embodiments, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the drawings and descriptions should be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
Rubber crumb can be formed by the polymerization reaction of monomers that can occur in either a solution of an organic solvent (e.g., toluene), or a latex (e.g, water-based) process. Once the polymer is formed, it can be coagulated or aggregated into small pieces called crumb. The rubber crumb can vary in diameter from about ¼ inch to about ¾ inch and has an irregular and inconsistent shape similar to popped corn. The color of the rubber crumb may vary between white to a light yellow or light brown. The coagulation process results in a slurry of crumb and water. The crumb may then be dried by squeezing and heating. When dry, the crumb may be weighed in a hopper and then pressed into a bale. The crumb may be inspected after it is coagulated and dried, but before it is packaged into a bale. This allows for the inspection of more of the contents of the rubber bale to produce a higher purity product. For instance, a contamination found in the rubber crumb, such as a black or dark piece, may be removed from the rubber crumb.
The conveyor 60 is configured to carry the rubber crumb 12 through the inspection system 10 such that the rubber crumb 12 is positioned substantially in a one-piece layer on the conveyor 60. The conveyor 60 may be a light color, such as white, to substantially match the color of the rubber crumb 12. For instance, the conveyor 60 may be coated in a white non-stick coating, such as the Tefzel ETFE low stick coating provided by DuPont. The speed of the conveyor 60 can vary between about 800 pounds per hour and about 6,000 pounds per hour. For instance, a speed of about 2,000 pounds per hour per foot of conveyor width is used to achieve a single crumb layer. As such, a maximum speed of about 3,000 pounds per hour is used for a conveyor 60 that is about 18 inches wide, and a maximum speed of about 6,000 pounds per hour is used for a conveyor 60 that is about 3 feet wide. If rates exceed these values, the rubber crumb 12 may pile on top of itself and not allow the camera 40 to inspect the entire rubber crumb 12. The width and/or the speed of the conveyor 60 may vary to achieve a single crumb layer.
The conveyor 60 may also vibrate to vibrate the rubber crumb 12 to thereby reveal a sufficient amount of the surface of each piece of rubber crumb 12 to the inspection system 10. For instance, the conveyor 60 may vibrate with an amplitude, or stroke, of between about 9/16 inch and about 1 inch and a frequency of between about 450 rpm and about 888 rpm. Of course other suitable configurations for the conveyor 60 will be apparent to one with ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings herein.
The lighting 50 is positioned above the conveyor 60 to illuminate the rubber crumb 12 and reduce or eliminate shadows that may be caused by the inconsistent and irregular shape of the rubber crumb 12. Such shadows may be inadvertently detected by the controller 20 as a contamination. The lighting 50 is thereby used to enhance the contrast between any contamination and the rubber crumb 12. As best seen in
For instance, alternatively or additionally to the linear light array bars, LED box lights may be used, as shown in
The camera 40 is then positioned substantially centrally between the lighting 50 above the conveyor 60. The camera 40 is configured to provide an examination area of a sufficient size for the controller 20. For instance, the camera 40 may include a camera viewing angle of between about 35 and 45 degrees, such as between about 40 and about 42 degrees, to provide an examination area with a width of between about 1.5 feet and about 3 feet and a length of between about 5 inches and about 11 inches. This examination area is lighted by lighting 50. The camera 40 may be positioned between about 2 feet and about 4 feet above the conveyor 60. The camera 40 may scan at a rate of between about 1.5 and about 4.5 frames per second. The scan rate may be adjusted depending on the quality of the controller 20. The shutter period for the camera 40 may be adjusted to regulate the amount of light entering the camera lens to allow enough light to minimize shadows without washing out the camera image. For instance, the shutter period can be between about 100 microseconds and about 1000 microseconds, such as between about 450 microseconds and about 975 microseconds. The camera 40 may be powered by about 12 VDC and about 1.2 A. The camera 40 may be JM Canty Camera Model No. VD4912-587. The camera 40 may be a color camera. Of course other suitable configurations for camera 40 will be apparent to one with ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings herein.
In some instances, the camera 40 and the lighting 50 may be mounted together using a mounting plate 45.
The controller 20, such as a computer, is then coupled with the camera 40, as shown in
The gate 62 may be operated by a solenoid valve 66 and a pneumatic cylinder 64, as shown in
Accordingly, when the cylinder 64 is in a retracted position, as shown in
It should be understood that any one or more of the teachings, expressions, embodiments, examples, etc. disclosed herein may be combined with any one or more of the other teachings, expressions, embodiments, examples, etc. that are disclosed herein. The teachings, expressions, embodiments, examples, etc. disclosed herein should therefore not be viewed in isolation relative to each other. Various suitable ways in which numerous aspects of the present disclosure may be combined will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings disclosed herein. Such modifications and variations are intended to be included within the scope of both the present disclosure and the claims.
Other suitable rejection systems 70, 170 may be used. For instance, if a contamination is detected, the contamination may be picked out of the remaining rubber crumb 12 or an arm may sweep across the conveyor 60, 160 to remove the contamination. Alternatively or additionally, the contamination may be manually removed from the rubber crumb 12. The conveyor 60, 160 may be stopped while the contamination is removed, or the conveyor 60, 160 may continue to move. If the rubber crumb 12 is sent to a reject bin to remove the contamination, the contaminated particles may be sorted from the rest of the rubber crumb 12 in the reject bin and the sorted rubber crumb 12 may be returned to the conveyor 60, 160.
Having shown and described various embodiments of the present disclosure, further adaptations of the methods and systems described herein may be accomplished by appropriate modifications by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Several of such potential modifications have been mentioned, and others will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For instance, examples, embodiments, geometrics, materials, dimensions, ratios, steps, and the like discussed above are illustrative and are not required. Accordingly, the scope of the present disclosure should be considered in terms of the following claims and is understood not to be limited to the details of structure and operation shown and described in the specification and drawings.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/198,719, entitled “Rubber Crumb Inspection System,” filed on Jul. 30, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5409119 | Rao Datari | Apr 1995 | A |
5659624 | Fazzari | Aug 1997 | A |
5927620 | Memon | Jul 1999 | A |
6011620 | Sites et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6260495 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6396579 | Hayamizu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6532064 | Hearn et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6628379 | Sudo et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7227148 | Sato | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7298870 | Ikeda | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7401728 | Markham et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7445170 | Cialone | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7660440 | Bourg, Jr. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7842896 | Calcoen | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7968814 | Imai | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8511474 | Maunder | Aug 2013 | B2 |
9101962 | Ackley et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9446434 | Hamid | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20040032979 | Honda | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20060011134 | Wain et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20120165973 | Earlam | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20140366633 | Schroeder et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102053091 | May 2011 | CN |
H 03-113352 | May 1991 | JP |
2000346813 | Dec 2000 | JP |
10 07 84962 | Dec 2007 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Nichols, E., “Improving Product Quality in Rubber Manufacturing,” ProSensus, Inc., 2016, downloaded on Aug. 8, 2016 from http://www.prosensus.com/multivariate-news/134-improving-product-quality-in-rubber-manufacturing, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170030838 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62198719 | Jul 2015 | US |