Patent Grant
9395989
The present invention relates generally to processing within a computing environment, and more specifically, to a run-time-instrumentation RIEMIT instruction for copying the contents of a register to a collection buffer.
Computer processors execute programs, or instruction streams, using increasingly complex branch prediction and instruction caching logic. These processes have been introduced to increase instruction throughput, and therefore processing performance. The introduction of logic for improving performance makes it difficult to predict with certainty how a particular software application will execute on the computer processor. During the software development process there is often a balance between functionality and performance. Software is executed at one or more levels of abstraction from the underlying hardware that is executing the software. When hardware is virtualized, an additional layer of abstraction is introduced. With the introduction of performance enhancing logic, and the various layers of abstraction it is difficult to have a thorough understanding of what is actually occurring at the hardware level when a program is executing. Without this information, software developers use more abstract methods, such as execution duration, memory usage, number of threads, etc., for optimizing the software application.
When hardware specific information is available, it is typically provided to a developer after the fact and it is provided in aggregate, at a high level, and/or interspersed with the activity of other programs, and the operating system, making it difficult to identify issues that may be impacting the efficiency and accuracy of the software application.
Embodiments include a method for executing a run-time-instrumentation EMIT (RIEMIT) instruction. A processor is configured to capture the run-time-instrumentation information of a stream of instructions. The RIEMIT instruction is fetched and executed. It is determined if the current run-time-instrumentation controls are configured to permit capturing and storing of run-time-instrumentation information in a run-time-instrumentation program buffer. If the controls are configured to store run-time-instrumentation instructions, then a RIEMIT instruction specified value is stored as an emit record of a reporting group in the run-time-instrumentation program buffer
Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with advantages and features, refer to the description and to the drawings.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The forgoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
An embodiment of the present invention is a run-time-instrumentation EMIT (RIEMIT) instruction for copying the contents of a register to a collection buffer.
In an embodiment, an RIEMIT instruction is provided that, when executed, copies the contents of a register to a collection buffer. In an embodiment, the RIEMIT instruction includes the register location that will be copied to the collection buffer upon a successful execution of the RIEMIT instruction. If the RIEMIT instruction executes successfully, then the contents of the register will be copied to the collection buffer. From the collection buffer the data may be copied to a program buffer in the main memory which is accessible by an application. If the RIEMIT instruction is not successfully executed, then the register data is not copied to the collection buffer.
In
In a mainframe, architected machine instructions are used by programmers, usually today “C” programmers often by way of a compiler application. These instructions stored in the storage medium may be executed natively in a z/Architecture IBM Server, or alternatively in machines executing other architectures. They can be emulated in the existing and in future IBM mainframe servers and on other machines of IBM (e.g. pSeries® Servers and xSeries® Servers). They can be executed in machines running Linux on a wide variety of machines using hardware manufactured by IBM®, Intel®, AMD™, Sun Microsystems and others. Besides execution on that hardware under a Z/Architecture®, Linux can be used as well as machines which use emulation by Hercules, UMX, Fundamental Software, Inc. (FSI) or Platform Solutions, Inc. (PSI), where generally execution is in an emulation mode. In emulation mode, emulation software is executed by a native processor to emulate the architecture of an emulated processor.
One or more of the components of the emulated host computer system 21 are further described in “IBM® z/Architecture Principles of Operation,” Publication No. SA22-7832-08, 9th Edition, August, 2010 which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. IBM is a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, N.Y., USA. Other names used herein may be registered trademarks, trademarks or product names of International Business Machines Corporation or other companies.
The native processor 27 typically executes emulation software stored in the emulation routines memory 23 comprising either firmware or a native operating system to perform emulation of the emulated processor. The emulation software is responsible for fetching and executing instructions of the emulated processor architecture. The emulation software maintains an emulated program counter to keep track of instruction boundaries. The emulation software may fetch one or more emulated machine instructions at a time and convert the one or more emulated machine instructions to a corresponding group of native machine instructions for execution by the native processor 27. These converted instructions may be cached such that a faster conversion can be accomplished. The emulation software maintains the architecture rules of the emulated processor architecture so as to assure operating systems and applications written for the emulated processor operate correctly. Furthermore the emulation software provides resources identified by the emulated processor architecture including, but not limited to control registers, general purpose registers, floating point registers, dynamic address translation function including segment tables and page tables for example, interrupt mechanisms, context switch mechanisms, time of day (TOD) clocks and architected interfaces to I/O subsystems such that an operating system or an application program designed to run on the emulated processor 29, can be run on the native processor 27 having the emulation software.
A specific instruction being emulated is decoded, and a subroutine called to perform the function of the individual instruction. An emulation software function emulating a function of an emulated processor 29 is implemented, for example, in a “C” subroutine or driver, or some other method of providing a driver for the specific hardware as will be within the skill of those in the art after understanding the description of the preferred embodiment.
In an embodiment, the invention may be practiced by software (sometimes referred to licensed internal code, firmware, micro-code, milli-code, pico-code and the like, any of which would be consistent with the present invention). Referring to
Alternatively, the program code may be embodied in the computer memory 2, and accessed by the processor 1 using a processor bus (not shown). Such program code includes an operating system which controls the function and interaction of the various computer components and one or more application programs. Program code is normally paged from a dense media such as the storage device 11 to computer memory 2 where it is available for processing by the processor 1. The techniques and methods for embodying software program code in memory, on physical media, and/or distributing software code via networks are well known and will not be further discussed herein. Program code, when created and stored on a tangible medium (including but not limited to electronic memory modules (RAM), flash memory, compact discs (CDs), DVDs, Magnetic Tape and the like is often referred to as a “computer program product.” The computer program product medium is typically readable by a processing circuit preferably in a computer system for execution by the processing circuit.
The base computer system 101 may communicate with other computers or networks of computers by way of a network adapter capable of communicating 108 with a network 109. Example network adapters are communications channels, token ring, Ethernet or modems. Alternatively, the base computer system 101 may communicate using a wireless interface, such as a cellular digital packet data (CDPD) card. The base computer system 101 may be associated with such other computers in a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the base computer system 101 may be a client in a client/server arrangement with another computer, etc.
Programming code 111 may be embodied in the memory 105, and accessed by the processor 106 using the processor bus. Such programming code includes an operating system which controls the function and interaction of the various computer components and one or more application programs 112. Program code is normally paged from long-term storage 107 to high-speed memory 105 where it is available for processing by the processor 106. The techniques and methods for embodying software programming code in memory, on physical media, and/or distributing software code via networks are well known and will not be further discussed herein. Program code, when created and stored on a tangible medium (including but not limited to electronic memory modules (RAM), flash memory, Compact Discs (CDs), DVDs, Magnetic Tape and the like is often referred to as a “computer program product”. The computer program product medium is typically readable by a processing circuit preferably in a computer system for execution by the processing circuit.
The cache that is most readily available to the processor (normally faster and smaller than other caches of the processor) is the lowest (L1 or level one) cache and main store (main memory) is the highest level cache (L3 if there are 3 levels). The lowest level cache is often divided into an instruction cache (I-Cache) holding machine instructions to be executed and a data cache (D-Cache) holding data operands.
Still referring to
In an embodiment, software programming code which embodies the present invention is accessed by the processor 106 of the base computer system 101 from long-term storage media, such as the long-term storage 107 of
Referring to
A program counter (instruction counter) 311 keeps track of the address of the current instruction to be executed. A program counter in a z/Architecture processor is 64 bits and may be truncated to 31 or 24 bits to support prior addressing limits. A program counter is typically embodied in a program status word (PSW) of a computer such that it persists during context switching. Thus, a program in progress, having a program counter value, may be interrupted by, for example, the operating system (i.e., the current context switches from the program environment to the operating system environment). The PSW of the program maintains the program counter value while the program is not active, and the program counter (in the PSW) of the operating system is used while the operating system is executing. In an embodiment, the program counter is incremented by an amount equal to the number of bytes of the current instruction. Reduced Instruction Set Computing (RISC) instructions are typically fixed length while Complex Instruction Set Computing (CISC) instructions are typically variable length. Instructions of the IBM z/Architecture are CISC instructions having a length of 2, 4 or 6 bytes. The program counter 311 is modified by either a context switch operation or a branch taken operation of a branch instruction for example. In a context switch operation, the current program counter value is saved in the PSW along with other state information about the program being executed (such as condition codes), and a new program counter value is loaded pointing to an instruction of a new program module to be executed. A branch taken operation is performed in order to permit the program to make decisions or loop within the program by loading the result of the branch instruction into the program counter 311.
In an embodiment, an instruction fetch unit 305 is employed to fetch instructions on behalf of the processor 106. The instruction fetch unit 305 either fetches the “next sequential instructions,” the target instructions of branch taken instructions, or the first instructions of a program following a context switch. In an embodiment, the instruction fetch unit 305 employs prefetch techniques to speculatively prefetch instructions based on the likelihood that the prefetched instructions might be used. For example, the instruction fetch unit 305 may fetch 16 bytes of instructions that include the next sequential instruction and additional bytes of further sequential instructions.
The fetched instructions are then executed by the processor 106. In an embodiment, the fetched instruction(s) are passed to a decode/dispatch unit 306 of the instruction fetch unit 305. The decode/dispatch unit 306 decodes the instruction(s) and forwards information about the decoded instruction(s) to appropriate execution units 307, 308, and/or 310. An execution unit 307 receives information about decoded arithmetic instructions from the instruction fetch unit 305 and will perform arithmetic operations on operands according to the operation code (opcode) of the instruction. Operands are provided to the execution unit 307 either from the memory 105, architected registers 309, or from an immediate field of the instruction being executed. Results of the execution, when stored, are stored either in memory 105, architected registers 309 or in other machine hardware (such as control registers, PSW registers and the like).
A processor 106 typically has one or more execution units 307, 308, and 310 for executing the function of the instruction. Referring to
An ADD instruction for example would be executed in an execution unit 307 having arithmetic and logical functionality while a floating point instruction for example would be executed in a floating point execution unit (not shown) having specialized floating point capability. Preferably, an execution unit operates on operands identified by an instruction by performing an opcode defined function on the operands. For example, an ADD instruction may be executed by an execution unit 307 on operands found in two architected registers 309 identified by register fields of the instruction.
The execution unit 307 performs the arithmetic addition on two operands and stores the result in a third operand where the third operand may be a third register or one of the two source registers. The execution unit 307 preferably utilizes an arithmetic logic unit (ALU) 402 that is capable of performing a variety of logical functions such as shift, rotate, and, or and XOR as well as a variety of algebraic functions including any of add, subtract, multiply, divide. Some ALUs 402 are designed for scalar operations and some for floating point. In embodiments, data may be big endian (where the least significant byte is at the highest byte address) or little endian (where the least significant byte is at the lowest byte address) depending on architecture. The IBM z/Architecture is big endian. Signed fields may be sign and magnitude, 1's complement or 2's complement depending on architecture. A 2's complement number is advantageous in that the ALU does not need to design a subtract capability since either a negative value or a positive value in 2's complement requires only and addition within the ALU. Numbers are commonly described in shorthand, where a 12 bit field defines an address of a 4,096 byte block and is commonly described as a 4 Kbyte (Kilo-byte) block for example.
Referring to
The execution of a group of instructions may be interrupted for a variety of reasons including a context switch initiated by an operating system, a program exception or error causing a context switch, an I/O interruption signal causing a context switch or multi-threading activity of a plurality of programs (in a multi-threaded environment) for example. In an embodiment, a context switch action saves state information about a currently executing program and then loads state information about another program being invoked. State information may be saved in hardware registers or in memory for example. State information includes a program counter value pointing to a next instruction to be executed, condition codes, memory translation information and architected register content. A context switch activity may be exercised by hardware circuits, application programs, operating system programs or firmware code (microcode, pico-code or licensed internal code (LIC) alone or in combination.
A processor accesses operands according to instruction defined methods. The instruction may provide an immediate operand using the value of a portion of the instruction, may provide one or more register fields explicitly pointing to either general purpose registers or special purpose registers (floating point registers for example). The instruction may utilize implied registers identified by an opcode field as operands. The instruction may utilize memory locations for operands. A memory location of an operand may be provided by a register, an immediate field, or a combination of registers and immediate field as exemplified by the z/Architecture long displacement facility wherein the instruction defines a base register, an index register and an immediate field (displacement field) that are added together to provide the address of the operand in memory. Location herein implies a location in main memory (main storage) unless otherwise indicated.
Referring to
Preferably addresses that an application program “sees” are often referred to as virtual addresses. Virtual addresses are sometimes referred to as “logical addresses” and “effective addresses.” These virtual addresses are virtual in that they are redirected to physical memory location by one of a variety of DAT technologies such as the DAT 312 of
In the case where the processor 106 is a processor of a multi-processor system, each processor has responsibility to keep shared resources such as I/O, caches, TLBs and Memory interlocked for coherency. In an embodiment, “snoop” technologies will be utilized in maintaining cache coherency. In a snoop environment, each cache line may be marked as being in any one of a shared state, an exclusive state, a changed state, an invalid state and the like in order to facilitate sharing.
The I/O units 304 of
Instrumentation data is data related to the operations of the processor 106. In an embodiment, access to instrumentation data and other system level metrics may be restricted, or unavailable. A computer processor operates under a privileged state, and a lesser-privileged state. In the privileged state, a program may have access to all system resources via privileged operations (e.g., access to all control registers and the supervisor memory space). The privileged state is also referred to as privileged mode or supervisor mode. An operating system executing on the computer processor may be operating in the privileged state. The lesser-privileged state is a non-privileged state where access to system resources is limited. For example, application programs running in lesser-privileged state may have limited or no access to control registers and may access only user memory space assigned to the application program by the operating system. The lesser-privileged state is typically assigned to application programs executed under control of an operating system, and no privileged operations can be performed in the lesser-privileged state. The lesser-privileged state is also known as a problem state, problem mode or user mode.
One such restricted resource that is not write accessible to a program executing in the lesser-privileged state is the program status word (PSW). The PSW may comprise a program counter of the next instruction to be executed, a condition code field usable by branch instructions, an instrumentation control field for indicating whether instrumentation is enabled or disabled, and other information used to control instruction sequencing and to determine the state of the computer processor including the privilege state assigned to the program. In a multithreaded processing environment, multiple programs share, or time slice, the available computer processor capacity. Each of the programs has context information including an associated PSW, an origin address of an address translation table for accessing main storage assigned to the program, a set of general purpose register current values, control registers, floating point registers, etc. The currently active, or controlling PSW, is called the current PSW. It governs the program currently being executed. The computer processor has an interruption capability, which permits the computer processor to context switch rapidly to another program in response to exception conditions and external stimuli. When an interruption occurs, the computer processor places the current PSW in an assigned storage location, called the old-PSW location, for the particular class of interruption. The computer processor fetches a new PSW from a second assigned storage location. This new context determines the next program to be executed. In an embodiment, these storage locations are located in a memory location accessible to the computer processor. When the computer processor has finished processing the interruption, the program handling the interruption may reload the old context including the old PSW, making it again the current PSW, so that the interrupted program can continue.
The fields of the PSW may be referenced either explicitly (e.g., when instruction execution reads part of the PSW bits), or implicitly (e.g., in instructions fetching, operand fetching, address generation calculations, address generation sources, etc.). The explicit reference is generally performed at execution time, whereas the implicit reference is generally performed at different stages of the pipeline during instruction execution (i.e., instruction fetch, instruction decode, execution time and completion time). Individual fields in the PSW may be referenced or updated independently of each other.
In an embodiment, by manipulating the context, an operating system controls computer processing resources, including enabling run-time-instrumentation by the computer processor. The run-time-instrumentation may be enabled or disabled during the execution of the operating system, as well as by any software applications executed by the operating system. The enabled/disabled state of run-time-instrumentation is saved as context information in the PSW associated with a program.
A run-time-instrumentation (RI) facility may be incorporated on models implementing z/Architecture. When the RI facility is installed and enabled, data is collected during program execution into one or more collection buffers within the CPU and then reported to a program buffer. Each unit of information stored is called a reporting group. The contents of a reporting group consist of multiple records whose contents represent events recognized by the CPU during program execution.
When the run-time-instrumentation facility is installed in a configuration, a PSW field (RI bit) enables run-time-instrumentation. Validity of the run-time-instrumentation controls determines the capability of turning on the RI bit, but when RI is one, the CPU controls are valid and run-time-instrumentation is enabled. The run-time-instrumentation facility may include the following instructions: load run-time-instrumentation controls, modify run-time-instrumentation controls, run-time-instrumentation emit, run-time-instrumentation next, run-time-instrumentation off, run-time-instrumentation on, store run-time-instrumentation controls, and test run-time-instrumentation controls.
The load run-time-instrumentation controls (LRIC) instruction initializes the run-time-instrumentation controls that govern run-time-instrumentation. The modify run-time-instrumentation controls (MRIC) instruction modifies all or a subset of the run-time-instrumentation controls originally established by LRIC. The run-time-instrumentation emit (RIEMIT) instruction collects the value of a general register by storing it into a collection buffer. The run-time-instrumentation next (RINEXT) instruction performs directed sampling of the next, sequential instruction (NSI) after RINEXT. The run-time-instrumentation off (RIOFF) instruction disables run-time-instrumentation. The run-time-instrumentation on (RION) instruction enables run-time-instrumentation. The store run-time-instrumentation controls (STRIC) instruction places the current values of the run-time-instrumentation controls into a specified storage location. The test run-time-instrumentation controls (TRIC) instruction examines the run-time-instrumentation controls. If valid, the state of a controls-altered indicator is set.
The run-time-instrumentation facility includes the ability for making a measurement-alert external interruption pending. Some of the information collected by run-time-instrumentation and reported to a program buffer is model-dependent and thus not defined. Samples and data provided by the run-time-instrumentation facility are intended for statistical estimation of performance characteristics, are substantially accurate, and may not be repeatable. For example, regardless of sampling mode, it is unpredictable if a sample instruction that caused an exception or is associated with certain system internal activities would result in the store of a reporting group and, if stored, whether the model-dependent data included in run-time-instrumentation data is affected.
A collection buffer is used to capture a set of records whose contents report on events recognized by the processor during program execution. Examples are: execution of one or more taken branches, transactional-execution abort events, and an operand of the RIEMIT instruction. Execution of the RIEMIT instruction collects the value of a general register by storing it into the collection buffer. Additional data can be collected and/or stored in other buffers, such as an instruction-data buffer.
Reporting is subject to reporting controls. When a sample instruction is identified, each reporting control enables the checking of a corresponding condition. If a corresponding condition exists, a reporting group is formed and stored. A reporting group is not stored when no reporting control is enabled or the corresponding condition does not exist for an enabled reporting control. Data reported about a sample instruction is acquired from the instruction-data buffer and other model-dependent sources, and then used to create the contents of one or more records of the reporting group, one such record being an instruction record.
Record types that may be captured in the reporting group store include: filler, extra, begin, timestamp, instruction, emit, TX abort, call, return, and transfer. A filler record is used in a reporting group when the number of valid records in the collection buffer is not sufficient to fill a reporting group of the current reporting-group size. An extra record may be used in the extra section of a reporting group. A begin record is the first record of the first reporting group. A timestamp record is stored as record 0 of every reporting group other than the first reporting group. An instruction record is created when a reporting group is stored for a sample instruction as the last record of the reporting group. An emit record is created by successful execution of RIEMIT. A transaction-execution (TX) mode abort record is created by either an implicit abort or by execution of a transaction abort instruction. A call record is created by execution of a branch instruction which is categorized as a call-type branch instruction. A return record is created by execution of a return-type branch instruction which is categorized as a return instruction. A transfer record is created by execution of a branch instruction which meets certain condition code criteria.
In an embodiment, the processor 106 further includes a register 510. The register 510 is a hardware register capable of storing words of data for use by the processor 106. The register 510 includes one or more latches for storing bits of data that are accessible by the processor 106. The register 510, may include general purpose registers and control registers for example. The processor 106 additionally includes an instrumentation module 506 that is in communication with the register 510. The instrumentation module 506 controls the instrumentation of the processor 106. The instrumentation module 506 is configured to collect instrumentation data, such as the execution path of one or more taken branches, transactional execution abort events, various runtime operands, timestamp information, etc. directly from the processor 106. The instrumentation module 506 collects the instrumentation data from the processor 106, and stores the instrumentation data in a collection buffer 508. In an embodiment, the collection buffer 508 is a circular buffer that collects data received from the instrumentation module 506, and when the circular buffer is filled it overwrites the oldest data with new data.
The processor 106 executes one or more operating systems 516 and one or more applications 518. The one or more operating systems 516 and one or more applications 518 are stored in a storage 520, such as a hard drive, CD/ROM, flash memory, etc. and are loaded into a main memory 514 in a runtime memory 504 area reserved for storing one or more active pieces of the currently executing operating system and/or application, called pages, which are loaded from the storage 520 into runtime memory 504 as needed. In an embodiment, each of the operating systems execute as a virtual machine managed by a hypervisor (not shown) and executed by the processor 106.
In an embodiment the processor 106 loads a PSW 512 in the register 510 from PSW data 512 in the main memory 514 for the currently executing operating system or application from the main memory 514 and sets one or more processor settings in, for example, the register 510. In an embodiment, the PSW in the register 510, includes one or more bits for enabling and controlling the instrumentation module 506.
The one or more applications 518 include software applications compiled to execute on a specific operating system, interpreted code executing on an interpreter (e.g., Java™), or operating system support threads (e.g., process management, daemons, etc.). Each of the one or more operating systems 516 and or the one or more applications 518 may execute an instruction to trigger the instrumentation module 506 to start, or to stop, the collecting instrumentation data.
In an embodiment, one of the one or more applications 518 executes an instruction that has been determined to be a sample instruction, thereby creating a sample point at the completion of execution of the sample instruction and that then causes the instrumentation module 506 to move the application's collected data from the collection buffer 508, to a program buffer 522 in main memory 514 that is accessible to the application. The main memory 514 may be any addressable memory known in the art. In an embodiment, the main memory 514 may include a fast-access buffer storage, sometimes called a cache. Each CPU may have an associated cache. In an additional embodiment, the main memory 514 is dynamic random access memory (DRAM). In a yet another embodiment, the main memory is a storage device, such as a computer hard drive, or flash memory accessible by an application.
In an embodiment, the controls of the run-time-instrumentation control are loaded using the LRIC instruction which loads the controls from the main memory 514 by overwriting the run-time-instrumentation controls with values from a run-time-instrumentation controls control block (RICCB).
The control block portion includes a validity bit 602 (V bit). The validity bit 602 indicates the validity of the set of run-time-instrumentation controls in the processor, as they were previously set by an LRIC instruction.
The control block also includes an S bit 604 which is used to determine if the lesser-privileged state program is allowed to execute the MRIC instruction. The K bit 606 indicates if the lesser-privileged state program is executing in a semi-privileged state with regard to the run-time-instrumentation controls, such as the origin address, and the limit address of the run-time-instrumentation controls. The H bit 608 determines whether the address controls (i.e., the origin address, limit address, and current address) refer to a primary virtual address space or a home virtual address space. The 0 bit 610 is ignored and treated as a 0. The RIEMIT instruction control bit 628 (E bit) controls the execution of the RIEMIT instruction. When the E bit 628 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero or ignored and treated as zero when run-time-instrumentation is enabled, RIEMIT executes a no-operation. When E bit 628 is one, and not otherwise ignored, RIEMIT is enabled to execute its defined function.
A problem-state sample reporting control bit 612 (Ps bit) is used in conjunction with lesser-privileged state programs. When in the lesser-privileged state and the Ps bit 612 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero, the reporting controls of the run-time-instrumentation controls are ignored when run-time-instrumentation is enabled, and thus do not cause a reporting group to be stored. When in the lesser-privileged state and the Ps bit 612 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is one, the reporting controls are checked and used according to their defined function.
A supervisor-state sample reporting control bit 614 (Qs bit) is used in conjunction with supervisor-state programs. When in the supervisor state and the Qs bit 614 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero, the reporting controls of the run-time-instrumentation controls are ignored when run-time-instrumentation is enabled, and thus do not cause a reporting group to be stored. When in the supervisor state and the Qs bit 614 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is one, the reporting controls are checked and used according to their defined function.
The lesser-privileged state collection buffer control bit 616 (Pc bit) controls updates to the collection buffer 508 of
The supervisor-state collection buffer control bit 618 (Qc bit) controls updates to the collection buffer 508. When in supervisor state and the Qc bit 618 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero, collection buffer controls of the run-time-instrumentation controls are ignored when run-time-instrumentation is enabled and the updates to the collection buffer 508 are prevented. When in supervisor state and the Qc bit 618 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is one, the indicated collection-buffer controls are checked and used according to their defined function.
The G bit 620 is the pending control of a run-time-instrumentation-halted interruption, also called a halted interruption. When the G bit 620 is zero, a halted interruption is not pending. When the G bit 602 is one, a halted interruption is pending. When the first reporting group in a program buffer 522 is written, the G bit 620 is set to zero. That is, when an origin address of the program buffer equals a limit address of the program buffer, the G bit 620 is set to zero. When an attempt to store other than the first reporting group in program buffer 522 is made, the G bit 620 is set to zero if the run-time-instrumentation-halted condition does not exist, and the reporting group is stored. When an attempt to store other than the first reporting group in program buffer 522 is made, the G bit 620 is set to one if the run-time-instrumentation-halted condition does exist, and the reporting group is not stored.
The U bit 622 is the enablement control for a buffer-full interruption and a halted interruption. When U bit 622 is zero, generation of an interruption request is disabled and, if pending, remains pending.
The L bit 624 is the pending control of a buffer-full interruption. When L bit 624 is zero, a buffer-full interruption is not pending. When L bit 624 is one, a buffer-full interruption is pending.
The key field 626 is a 4-bit unsigned integer whose value is used as a storage-protect key for the store of a reporting group. A store of a reporting group is permitted only when the storage key matches the access key associated with the request for storage access, and a fetch is permitted when the storage key matches the access key or when a fetch-protection bit of the storage key is zero. The keys match when the four access control bits of the storage key are equal to the access key, or when the access key is zero.
In an embodiment, the run-time-instructions emit (RIEMIT) instruction is executed in order to copy data from a general purpose register, such as the register 510, on the processor 106 to the collection buffer 508. In an embodiment, the operand of the RIEMIT includes a register address that specifies the location of the general register (i.e., the target register), that contains data which will be copied to the collection buffer 508 of
At block 810 it is determined if the RIEMIT instruction is being executed in the privileged stated, and if the Qc bit of the run-time-instrumentation controls is set to 1. If the Qc bit of the run-time-instrumentation controls is 1, and/or the RIEMIT instruction is not being executed from the privileged state, then processing continues at block 812. At block 812, it is determined if the E bit of the run-time-instrumentation controls is set to 0. If the E bit is not set to 0, then processing continues at block 814.
At block 814, it is determined if the program buffer 522 of
Returning to block 804, if run-time-instrumentation is not enabled, then then at block 818 the RIEMIT instruction is executed as a no operation, and the data in the target register is not copied to the collection buffer 508. Returning to block 806, if the run-time-instrumentation controls are not valid, then at block 818 the RIEMIT instruction is executed as a no operation, and the data in the register identified by RIEMIT is not copied to the collection buffer 508. Returning to block 808, if the RIEMIT instruction is being executed by the lesser-privileged state and the Pc bit is set to 0, then at block 818 the RIEMIT instruction is executed as a no operation, and the data in the register identified by RIEMIT is not copied to the collection buffer 508. Returning to block 810, if the RIEMIT instruction is being executed by the privileged state and the Qc bit is set to 0, then at block 818 the RIEMIT instruction is executed as a no operation, and the data in the register identified by RIEMIT is not copied to the collection buffer 508. Returning to block 812, if the E bit is set 0, then at block 818 the RIEMIT instruction is executed as a no operation, and the data in the register identified by RIEMIT is not copied to the collection buffer 508. Returning to block 814, if the program buffer 522 is full, then at block 818 the RIEMIT instruction is executed as a no operation, and the data in the register identified by RIEMIT is not copied to the collection buffer 508.
Although the above embodiments copy data from a general purpose register to the collection buffer, in an embodiment, the RIEMIT instruction may be configured to copy data from other memory locations including one or more of a floating point register, an access register, a control register, and/or a condition code register. In an additional embodiment, the RIEMIT instruction includes an operand with an address in main memory, the contents of which will be copied to the collection buffer.
In an embodiment, a current address field (RCA) 906 may be updated by the MRIC instruction. The current address field 906 examines the reporting group size field 944 (RGS field) and affects the number of significant bit positions used to form the address of the program buffer. The 64-bit run-time-instrumentation program buffer current address is word 0, bit positions 0 through 26-RGS of word 1, and RGS+5 binary zeros appended on the right. This is the starting location in the program buffer 522 of
A remaining sample interval count field 942 (RSIC field) may be updated by the lesser-privileged program using the MRIC instruction. The RSIC field 942 includes a 64-bit unsigned integer that indicates a remaining sample interval count. When the value of the RSIC field 942 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero or equal to the value in a scaling factor field 940 (SF field), and run-time-instrumentation is enabled, then the next sample interval is a full interval based on the sampling mode field 908 (M field) and SF field 940 values. When RSIC field 942 is nonzero and less than the SF field 940 and run-time-instrumentation is enabled, the next sample interval is a partial interval. When the RSIC field 942 is nonzero and greater than the SF field 940 value and run-time-instrumentation is enabled, the next sample interval is an extended interval. When an extended interval expires, the next interval is based on the SF field 940 value. When the RSIC field 942 is set to a nonzero value, it is subject to the same model-dependent maximum limit to which the SF field 940 is also subject. When the original value of the RSIC field 942 is zero, the sampling mode will dictate whether the RSIC field 942 is set to the value in the SF field 940 during execution of LRIC and MRIC instructions, or whether it continues to show as zero until run-time-instrumentation is enabled.
The SF field 940 contains a 64-bit unsigned integer whose value is a scaling factor count of units. The dimension of the units is determined from the sampling mode field 908 (M field). When the value in the RSIC field 942 is zero, the SF field 940 provides an initial value of the RSIC field 942 that is decremented to zero at which point the current instruction is recognized as a sample instruction, and the interval count is refreshed from the SF field 940 value. A valid value of the SF field 940 is in the range one to 264-1. If zero is specified, a value of one is assumed. However, each model may have both a minimum and a maximum value of the SF field 940. The minimum and maximum values may also be different based on the sampling mode field 908. If a value less than the minimum is specified, the model-dependent minimum value is loaded. If a value greater than the maximum value is specified, the model-dependent maximum value is loaded.
The DC control field 936 is a 4-bit unsigned integer whose value designates a cache-latency level associated with a data fetch or store cache miss. That is, the sample instruction encountered a data access cache miss. Unless prohibited by another run-time-instrumentation control, an attempt is made to store a reporting group representing the sample instruction whose data access recognized a miss at a cache-latency level numerically greater than or equal to the level designated by the value of the DC control field 936. The cache structure and cache-latency level for data access is model dependent. For an instruction with multiple or long operands, it is model dependent which, if any, operand access is used for reporting control. Model-dependent behavior may ignore the value of the DC control field 936 and thus not use it as a reason to store a reporting group.
The IC field 934 is a 4-bit unsigned integer whose value designates a cache-latency level associated with an instruction-fetch cache miss. That is, the fetch of the sample instruction encountered an instruction-fetch cache miss. For both the IC field 934 and DC control field 936, a cache-latency level is an abstraction of how far a certain cache level access is from the observing processor. The latency level depends on the combination of the amount of nested cache levels between the processor and main storage, and how such cache levels are shared among multiple processors. A larger latency level generally corresponds to a more time-consuming access. Values in the IC field 934 and DC control field 936 may be thought of as zero-origin identification of a cache-latency level. For example, a value of zero corresponds to an L1 cache (i.e., the cache that is closest to the processor). A value of one is therefore the next layer of cache which may be known as an L2 cache, or even an L1.5 cache in some machines. Values of 2-15 designate the logical progression of additional cache-latency layers until main memory is reached, but not including main memory itself. Generally, cache structures do not go as deep as fifteen layers. Therefore, a value of 15 in the IC field 934 and DC control field 936 is interpreted as a special case, meaning that a cache miss on instruction fetch or data access, respectively and regardless of cache-latency level, is not recognized for the purpose of generating the store of a reporting group. Unless prohibited by another run-time-instrumentation control, an attempt is made to store a reporting group representing the sample instruction whose fetch recognized a miss at a cache-latency level numerically greater than or equal to the level designated by the value of the IC field 934. The cache structure and cache-latency level for instruction fetching is model dependent. Model-dependent behavior may ignore the value of the IC field 934 and thus not use it as a reason to store a reporting group.
The cache-latency-level-override reporting control bit 932 (F bit) is for non-branch instructions and for branch-prediction controls. When the F bit 932 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero, the cache-reporting controls (IC field 934 and DC control field 936) of the run-time-instrumentation controls are checked and used according to their defined function. The branch-prediction controls (BPxn 922, BPxt 924, BPti 926, and BPni 928 bits) of the run-time-instrumentation controls are checked and used according to their defined function. When the F bit 932 is one, these same controls are ignored and a reporting group is stored unless prohibited by another control.
The data-cache-miss control bit 930 (D bit) indicates if a reporting group is to be stored. If the D bit 930 is one, an extra type record may or may not be placed in the extra section of the reporting group which contains model dependent data about the sample instruction.
The MRIC instruction includes branch-prediction (BP) reporting controls (BPxn 922, BPxt 924, BPti 926, and BPni 928). If a BP reporting control bit in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero, the corresponding condition is not checked. If a BP reporting-control bit is one and the corresponding branch-prediction condition exists, and a reporting group is stored.
The BPxn bit 922, when one, enables checking of branch-prediction information. Thus, if the sample branch is incorrectly predicted to be taken but is not taken, a reporting group is stored.
The BPxt bit 924, when one, enables checking of the branch-prediction information. Thus, if the sample branch is incorrectly predicted to be not taken but is taken, a reporting group is stored.
The BPti bit 926, when one, enables checking of the branch-prediction information. Thus, if the sample branch is correctly predicted to be taken, and is taken, but the branch target is incorrectly predicted, a reporting group is stored.
The BPni bit 928, when one, enables checking of the branch-prediction information. Thus, if the sample branch is correctly predicted to not be taken, and is not taken, and the branch target is incorrectly predicted, a reporting group is stored.
The enablement control of transactional-execution-mode records bit 920 (X bit) controls the collection of transactional-execution-mode abort records. When the X bit 920 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero, transactional-execution-mode abort records are not collected. When the X bit 920 is one, transactional-execution mode abort records are collected and placed in the collection buffer 508 of
The RIEMIT instruction control bit 918 (E bit) controls the execution of the RIEMIT instruction. When the E bit 918 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero or ignored and treated as zero when run-time-instrumentation is enabled, RIEMIT executes a no-operation. When E bit 918 is one, and not otherwise ignored, RIEMIT is enabled to execute its defined function.
The J bit 946 when zero, specifies that the branch on condition (BC) instruction is in the other-type branch category, regardless of mask value. If the J bit 946 is one, the BC instruction which specifies a mask of 15 is in the return-type branch category. When the BC instruction specifies a mask of 1-14, it is not affected by the J bit 946 and is always in the other type branch category. When in the return-type branch category, the R bit 916 controls inclusion into the collection buffer 508 of
The instruction address code bit 914 (C bit) controls the enablement of call type branches. If the C bit 914 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is one and the instruction is a call-type branch, the collection buffer is updated. If model-dependent detection of both call-type and return-type branches is combined, the C bit 914 operates on both types and the R bit 916 is not effective.
The R bit 916 is the enablement control of return-type branches. If the R bit 916 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is one and the instruction is a return-type branch, then the collection buffer 508 is updated.
The B bit 948 is the enablement control of branches other than call-type and return-type branches. If the B bit 948 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is one and the instruction is an other-type branch recognized by run-time-instrumentation, then the collection buffer 508 is updated.
The maximum-address exceeded bit 912 (MAE bit), if set to 1, indicates that, one or more reporting groups have been stored that have an instruction address code (C field) set to one. Once the MAE bit 912 is set to one, continuing execution of run-time-instrumentation does not set it back to zero. Execution of the LRIC instruction or the MRIC instruction which specifies the MAE bit as zero will set the MAE bit to zero.
The run-time-instrumentation next (RINEXT) control bit 910 (N bit) controls the enablement of the run-time-instrumentation next instruction, which controls the execution of a sample instruction. When the N bit 910 in the run-time-instrumentation controls is zero or ignored and treated as zero, RINEXT executes a no-operation. When the N bit 910 is one, and not otherwise ignored, RINEXT is enabled to execute its defined function.
The sampling mode field 908 (M field) is a 4-bit unsigned integer whose value in the run-time-instrumentation controls specifies the sampling mode for the run-time-instrumentation controls.
The reporting group size field 944 (RGS) is a 3-bit unsigned integer whose value specifies the number of records of a reporting group (RRG). The number of records in a reporting group may vary from two records, including a begin/timestamp record and an instruction last record, up to two hundred fifty-six records. In an embodiment, the upper limit may be model dependent. The number of 16-byte records placed into a reporting group is 2(RGS+1).
The primary-CPU capability suppression control bit 938 (Y bit) and the secondary-CPU capability suppression control bit 939 (Z bit) are collectively referred to as the suppression control. Suppression of the storing of a reporting group means that an attempt to store is not performed. The suppression control is not effective and no suppression occurs when the CPU capability of all CPUs in the configuration is the same. In a configuration, if the CPU capability of a CPU differs from the capability of another CPU, the suppression control is in effect, and at least one CPU is said to be operating at the CPU capability or primary-CPU capability while at least one other CPU is said to be operating at the secondary-CPU capability. The primary and secondary CPU capabilities are different operating speeds. When Y bit 938 and Z bit 939 are both zero, suppression does not occur. When Y bit 938 is zero and Z bit 939 is one, suppression occurs if the CPU, e.g., processor 106, is operating at the secondary-CPU capability. When Y bit 938 is one and Z bit 939 is zero, suppression occurs if the CPU, e.g., processor 106, is operating at the primary-CPU capability. When Y bit 938 and Z bit 939 are both one, suppression occurs.
The above fields and bits of
As described previously, when run-time instrumentation is enabled during program execution, run-time-instrumentation data is collected within the processor 106 in the collection buffer 508. In an embodiment, the collection buffer 508 is an internal buffer of the processor 106 that is used to save the most recent records collected. When a sample trigger point is detected, the records are copied from the collection buffer 508 into the program buffer 522 as part of a reporting group that is written to the program buffer 522. In an embodiment, the records are copied from the collection buffer 508 in a non-destructive manner.
The collection buffer 508 may be referred to as a “hardware collection buffer” because the collection buffer 508 is located in the processor and in an embodiment implemented as an array of register pairs for storing an instruction address and event metadata for a given event. An example of an event is a taken branch for which the register pair may hold the instruction address of the branch, and the metadata may hold the target of the branch as well as information regarding the historic behavior of the branch. In an embodiment, the register pairs are ordered and updated sequentially as events occur in the instruction stream. A counter is maintained to indicate the index of the most recently updated entry in the array. In an embodiment the collection buffer 508 is a circular buffer, and when the collection buffer 508 is full, the next event overwrites the first entry in the array, and sequential updating of the array's register pairs re-starts on subsequent events. As such, assuming an array CB[0] to CB[N−1] and a counter i indicating the latest updated index, the trace of events captured would be represented by the sequence CB[i], CB[i−1] . . . CB[1], CB[0], CB[N−1], CB[N−2] . . . CB[i+1]. In another embodiment, two pointers are used: a head pointer pointing to the oldest entry in the buffer, and a tail/current pointer pointing to the newest entry in the buffer.
Events that represent a state of the processor 106 at any given execution point are captured sequentially in the collection buffer 508. The collection buffer 508 is used to capture a set of records whose contents report on events recognized by the processor 106 during program execution (e.g., execution of one or more taken branches, transactional-execution abort events, the operand of a RIEMIT instruction, etc.). In an embodiment the events recognized depend on the contents of the RICCB shown in
An embodiment of the collection buffer 508 stores up to thirty-two entries (i.e., information about thirty-two events), with each instruction address specified by sixty-four bits (e.g., bits 0:63), and event metadata by sixty-four bits (e.g., bits 64:127). The size of the collection buffer (RCB) is a model dependent count, representing a number of records. In an embodiment, the byte size of the collection buffer 508 is a multiple of a sixteen byte record size. The size of the collection buffer (RCB) is a number of records greater than or equal to the difference between the count of the largest reporting group (RRG) of the model and the count of the records in a reporting group that are not acquired from the collection buffer (RNC). Thus, in an embodiment, the size of the collection buffer is expressed as: RCB≧(RRG−RNC).
In an embodiment, contents of the collection buffer 508 and the instruction data buffer (if one is used) are purged or otherwise affected by the following events: (1) an interruption; (2) the PSW bit that turns on and off the run-time instrumentation facility (e.g., bit 24) changes from a one to a zero; and (3) when a sample instruction is identified when the run-time instrumentation facility is in a transactional-execution mode (in this case, further update of the collection data buffer 508 and instruction-data buffer stops and resumes when the transaction ends, at which time, a store of the reporting group is pending and the collection buffer 508 and instruction-data buffers are purged).
In an embodiment, such as the emulated host computer system shown in
In embodiments, additional capabilities can effect data collection and may be viewed as providing additional data-collection points while not substantially disturbing the regular instruction-count or cycle-count sampling described previously. These include execution of a RIEMIT instruction, which collects the value of a general register by storing it into the collection buffer 508. In addition, the data-collection control bits in the run-time instrumentation controls described previously can be used to customize the types of data collected (e.g., the E, C, R, and B control bits). In this manner, the type of data collected is programmable.
In an embodiment, an instruction-data buffer is implemented to collect model dependent sample instruction data that is used to construct a run-time-instrumentation instruction record. The instruction-data buffer collects data from an instruction in anticipation of being available when the instruction is identified as a sample instruction. In an embodiment, the instruction-data buffer is a hardware buffer/storage location in the processor where information about an instruction that would become a trigger as a sample point is saved, so that during the log out process, it can be written out together with data from the collection buffer 508. Similar to the collection buffer 508 it includes the instruction address, and meta-data associated with that instruction. The metadata in the instruction-data buffer is often machine dependent and may include, but is not limited to: cache miss related information, and branch prediction related information.
In accordance with embodiments, other data collected may not be from the collection buffer 508 and not from the instruction-data buffer. Examples include data used to form parts of the following: (1) the first record of a reporting group: timestamp or begin record; and (2) additional types of records may be created for every reporting group and thus not stored in the collection buffer 508, such records, when present, may be placed in the extra or machine-dependent section of a reporting group. These records are referred to herein as “system information records.”
The header section 1002 may include a begin record or a timestamp record to hold status, tracking, and/or timing information. A begin record is stored in the header section 1002 for the first reporting group stored in a program buffer (i.e., when the RCA 906 is equal to the ROA 902). In an embodiment, the begin record includes a record type field of “02”, a number of reporting groups (NRG) field for indicating how many reporting groups are currently stored in the program buffer, a RGS field to indicate the size of the reporting groups, a stopped (S) field for indicating whether or not the program buffer 522 is full, a halted (H) field for indicting whether the run-time instrumentation is halted, and a time of day (TOD) clock field for indicating when the begin record was written. In an embodiment, at least a subset of the fields in the begin record are sourced from the RI control block (e.g., RICCB). An embodiment of the timestamp record has a record type of “03” and includes a TOD clock field for indicating when the record was stored. In an embodiment, a timestamp record is stored in the header section 1002 for each reporting group other than the first reporting group.
The body section 1004 of the reporting group may include a variety of records for events and information sampled from collection buffer 508. Events and information may represent, for example, state information captured by an emit instruction, a transactional-execution abort, a call, a return, a branch, and filler.
In an embodiment, an emit record is created and stored in the collection buffer 508 upon a successful execution of a RIEMIT instruction. An embodiment of the emit record includes a record type field of “10”, an instruction address code field to indicate how the instruction address bit positions of the current PSW are represented in the emit record, an instruction address field which varies depending on the addressing mode (e.g., 64, 31 or 24 bit) and contains the instruction address of the RIEMIT instruction or execute type instruction if the RIEMIT was the target of an execute type instruction, and an emit data field for storing the data from the general register specified by the RIEMIT instruction.
In an embodiment, a transactional execution mode abort record is created and stored in the collection buffer 508 by either an implicit abort or by execution of a transaction abort instruction. An embodiment of the abort record includes a record type field of “11”, an instruction address code field to indicate how the instruction address bit positions of the current PSW are represented in the transactional-execution abort record, an instruction address field which varies depending on the addressing mode (e.g., 64, 31 or 24 bit) and contains the instruction address of the aborted instruction or execute type instruction if the aborted instruction was the target of an execute type instruction, and a field for any model dependent data associated with the abort.
In an embodiment, a call record is created by execution of a call type branch instruction, such as: BRANCH AND SAVE (BASR) when the R2 field is nonzero, BRANCH AND SAVE (BAS), BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE LONG, BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE, BRANCH AND LINK (BALR) when the R2 field is nonzero, BRANCH AND LINK (BAL), and BRANCH AND SAVE AND SET MODE when the R2 field is nonzero. An embodiment of the call record includes a record type field of “12”, an instruction address code field to indicate how the instruction address bit positions of the current PSW are represented in the call record, an instruction address field which varies depending on the addressing mode (e.g., 64, 31 or 24 bit) and contains the address of the branch instruction or execute type instruction if the branch instruction was the target of an execute type instruction, and a well behaved field for indicating whether or not the branch was correctly predicted, and a target address field containing the branch target address (also referred to as the “called location”).
Return records and transfer records may have the same format as the call records. In an embodiment, a return record has a record type field of “13” and is created by execution of a return type branch instruction such as a BRANCH ON CONDITION (BCR) when the R2 field is nonzero and the mask is 15. For the return record, the instruction address field contains the address of the branch instruction or execute type instruction if the branch is the target of an execute type instruction, and the target address field contains the return location.
In an embodiment, a transfer record has a record type field of “14” and is created by execution of a return type branch instruction such as: a. BRANCH ON CONDITION (BCR) when the R2 field is nonzero and the mask is in the range 1-14; b. BRANCH ON CONDITION (BC) when the J bit is zero or the mask is in the range 1-14; c. BRANCH ON COUNT (BCT, BCTR, BCTG,BCTGR); d. BRANCH ON INDEX HIGH (BXH, BXHG); e. BRANCH ON INDEX LOW OR EQUAL(BXLE, BXLEG); f. BRANCH RELATIVE ON CONDITION(BRC); g. BRANCH RELATIVE ON CONDITION LONG (BRCL); h. BRANCH RELATIVE ON COUNT (BRCT,BRCTG); i. BRANCH RELATIVE ON COUNT HIGH(BRCTH); j. BRANCH RELATIVE ON INDEX HIGH(BRXH, BRXHG); k. BRANCH RELATIVE ON INDEX LOW OR EQUAL (BRXLE, BRXLG); l. COMPARE AND BRANCH (CRB, CGRB); m. COMPARE AND BRANCH RELATIVE (CRJ,CGRJ); n. COMPARE IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH(CIB, CGIB); o. COMPARE IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH RELATIVE (CIJ, CGU); p. COMPARE LOGICAL AND BRANCH(CLRB, CLGRB); q. COMPARE LOGICAL AND BRANCH RELATIVE(CLRJ, CLGRJ); r. COMPARE LOGICAL IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH (CLIB, CLGIB); and s. COMPARE LOGICAL IMMEDIATE AND BRANCH RELATIVE (CLIJ, CLGU). The transfer record is created when the branch is taken. For the transfer record, the instruction address field contains the address of the branch instruction or execute type instruction if the branch is the target of an execute type instruction, and the target address field contains the return location.
A filler record is used in a reporting group when the number of valid records in the collection buffer 508 is not sufficient to fill a reporting group of the current RGS. An embodiment of a filler record includes record type field of “00” to indicate that the record is a filler record and the remaining bytes are undefined.
The extra records section 1006, when present, may contain model-dependent records. In an embodiment, the format of an extra record is similar to the filler record except for the record type is set to “01” to indicate that the record is an extra record and the remaining bytes of the extra record may contain model dependent data.
The footer section 1008 can include an instruction record containing information about execution of a sample instruction. An instruction record is created when a reporting group is stored for a sample instruction. An embodiment of the instruction record includes a record type field of “04”, an instruction address code field to indicate how the instruction address bit positions of the current PSW are represented in the instruction record, an instruction address field which varies depending on the addressing mode (e.g., 64, 31 or 24 bit) and contains the instruction address of the sample instruction or execute type instruction if the sample instruction was the target of an execute type instruction, and an instruction-data buffer (IDB) field containing any model dependent data collected from the IDB.
As described above, embodiments can be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes. An embodiment may include a computer program product 1100 as depicted in
Technical effects and benefits include a run-time-instrumentation EMIT (RIEMIT) instruction to allow a copy of the contents of a register to be written to a collection buffer in the processor, which is subsequently copied to the program buffer. An additional benefit is the ability to enable and disable execution of the RIEMIT instruction for both the privileged state, and the lesser-privileged state.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Aspects of the present invention are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or schematic diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
As described above, embodiments can be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatuses for practicing those processes. In embodiments, the invention is embodied in computer program code executed by one or more network elements. Embodiments include a computer program product on a computer usable medium with computer program code logic containing instructions embodied in tangible media as an article of manufacture. Exemplary articles of manufacture for computer usable medium may include floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, universal serial bus (USB) flash drives, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer program code logic is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. Embodiments include computer program code logic, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code logic is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose microprocessor, the computer program code logic segments configure the microprocessor to create specific logic circuits.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/422,577, filed Mar. 16, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4821178 | Levin et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 5151981 | Westcott et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5341500 | Moyer et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5371894 | DiBrino | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5386565 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5491793 | Somasundaram et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5553293 | Andrews et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5608866 | Horikawa | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5675768 | Tran et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5675817 | Moughanni et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5737516 | Circello et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5768500 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5796939 | Berc et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5809325 | Hinton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5887189 | Birns | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5944841 | Christie | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5960198 | Roediger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5964893 | Circello et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978902 | Mann | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987249 | Grossman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6077312 | Bates et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6094729 | Mann | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6145123 | Torrey et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154818 | Christie | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158049 | Goodwin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6161196 | Tsai | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6163840 | Chrysos et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6216237 | Klemm et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6243836 | Whalen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6321329 | Jaggar et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6378125 | Bates et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6519766 | Barritz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6539500 | Kahle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6574727 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6631518 | Bortnikov et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6634020 | Bates et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6769054 | Sahin et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6918065 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6918110 | Hundt et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6961927 | Erb et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6978462 | Adler et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 7013456 | Van Dyke et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7047520 | Moore et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047521 | Bunnell | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7080289 | Swaine et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7103877 | Arnold et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7137105 | Madsen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7181600 | Uhler | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7239980 | DeWitt, Jr. et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7500152 | Moyer et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7716335 | Dinker et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7735072 | Altman et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7814466 | Chen et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7870438 | Bartik et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7904460 | Armour et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7962314 | Chernoff | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8141052 | Guarraci | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8307345 | Sunkara et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8312253 | Circello et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8473925 | Gagliardi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8572577 | Bates et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8707314 | Gummaraju et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 20020046305 | Babaian et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005423 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030084375 | Moore et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149961 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154430 | Allen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040019886 | Berent et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133882 | Angel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139304 | Arimilli et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040268315 | Gouriou et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050034017 | Airaud et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120337 | Serrano et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198466 | Estlick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228631 | Maly et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060101416 | Callahan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184832 | Floyd et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190930 | Hecht et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236067 | Attinella et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242627 | Wygodny et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248515 | Qadeer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259822 | Swoboda | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259824 | Sohm et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259830 | Blevin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060267818 | Agarwala | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277441 | Edgar et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070006172 | Swoboda et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070079177 | Spirakis et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143755 | Sahu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070186056 | Saha et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214342 | Newburn et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260849 | Chen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261032 | Chen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261033 | Chen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288900 | Lev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005730 | Inamdar | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098364 | Gray-Donald et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114806 | Kosche | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080189529 | Bohizic et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222382 | Snyder | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250275 | Walker | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250397 | Dahms et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090037887 | Chavan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090113398 | Birkill et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150890 | Yourst | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157359 | Chernoff | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090178036 | Levine | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090204794 | Busaba et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210752 | Bartik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090320001 | Bates et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100064279 | Stewart | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100077143 | Reid et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100088771 | Heller et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100146220 | Panchenko et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191917 | Archer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100229043 | Saha et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100242025 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100281464 | Vajapeyam | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100293342 | Morfey et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312992 | Wakabayashi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318994 | Holmberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110145498 | Taillefer et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145512 | Adl-Tabatabai et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110153960 | Rajwar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154298 | Alexander et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154299 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173588 | Salapura et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110283264 | Gagliardi | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110283265 | Gagliardi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110302569 | Kunze et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110314342 | Gilkerson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120167057 | Schmich et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120311273 | Marathe et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1912849 | Feb 2007 | CN |
| 101021800 | Aug 2007 | CN |
| 101165658 | Apr 2008 | CN |
| 101278265 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 101952806 | Jan 2011 | CN |
| 0257241 | Mar 1988 | EP |
| 0919919 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 2048578 | Apr 2009 | EP |
| 64021546 | Jan 1989 | JP |
| 1145736 | Jun 1989 | JP |
| 7013806 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| 8050556 | Feb 1996 | JP |
| 9265407 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 9282196 | Oct 1997 | JP |
| 2001051874 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2002252163 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002342114 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2010086520 | Apr 2010 | JP |
| WO2007145903 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO2010144757 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,538; Non-Final Office Action; Date Filed Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed Jan. 3, 2014; 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/785,089; Non-Final Office Action; Date Filed: Mar. 5, 2013; Date Mailed Jan. 3, 2014; 28 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,588, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2014, 43 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/788,490, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2014, 31 pages. |
| EP Application No. 13760606 Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 11, 2014; 7 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,538; Notice of Allowance; Date Filed: Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Dec. 23, 2014; 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,542 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 24, 2014, 25 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,577; Final Office Action; Date Filed: Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Dec. 15, 2014; 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/785,089; Notice of Allowance; Date Filed: Mar. 5, 2013; Date Mailed: Dec. 24, 2014; 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/788,368 Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2014, 47 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,532, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 3, 2014, 32 pages. |
| BJ Bruetsch, et al., Hardward Assist for Program Event Recording, http://www.ip.com/pubview/IPCOM000059699D; Jan. 1, 1986, 3 pages. |
| RJ Bullions, et al., Dynamic Enabling/Disabiling of Program Event Recording Range Compare, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 9, 1978, 3 pages. |
| C.R. Conklin, et al., Forced Enablement of Program Event Recording for a Guest, Including a BC-Mode Guest, http://www.ip.com/pubview/IPCOM000117262D; Jan. 1, 1996, 3 pages. |
| K. Getzlaff, et al., Hardware-Implemented Program Event Recording, http://ww.ip.com;pubview/IPCOM000121669D; Sep. 1, 1991, 4 pages. |
| Matthew C. Merten et al. “A Hardware-Driven Profiling Scheme for Identifying Program Hot Spots to Support Runtime Optimization”; Appears in Proceedings of the 26th Annual Intl. Symposium on Compjer Architecture (ISCA); May 1999, pp. 136-147. |
| FE Sakalay, Program Event Recording, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 15, No. 4, Sep. 1972, 3 pages. |
| IBM, “zArchitecture—Principles of Operation,” SA22-7832-8, Aug. 2010, pp. 1-1496, http://www.ibm.com/support/documentation. |
| Anonymous Disclosed: “Embedded Trace Macrocell—ETMv1.0 to ETMv3.5” Architecture Specification, ARM, Jan. 2011, pp. 1-420. |
| EP European Application No. 13761271.9 Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2015 for POU920120002EP1, 7 pages. |
| EP European Patent Applciation No. 13761846,8 Supplemental EP Search Report Mailed Mar. 9, 2015, 7 pages. |
| EP European Patent Application No. 13760531.7 Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 9, 2015; 7 pages. |
| European Application No. 13760324.7 Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 21, 2015, 7 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. 13760503.6 Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 6, 2015, 6 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,542 Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2015, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,546; Non-Final Office Action; Date Filed: Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Jan. 14, 2015; 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,550 Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 24, 2014, 18 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,552; Final Office Action; Date Filed: Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Jan. 26, 2015; 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,577; Notice of Allowance; Date Filed Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Mar. 4, 2015; 14 pages. |
| European Patent Application No. 12762008.4 Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 16, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Gschwind, et al., “Binary Translation and Architecture Convergence Issues for IBM System/390,” International Conference on Supercomputing, Conference Proceedings, ACM, New York, May 8, 2000, 12 pages. |
| EP Application No. 13760362.7 Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2015, 5 pages. |
| EP Application No. 13761389.9 Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2015, 8 pages. |
| European Application No. 13760760.2 Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 30, 2015, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,538; Notice of Allowance: Date Filed: Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Apr. 6, 2015; 26 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/788,490; Notice of Allowance; Date Filed: Mar. 7, 2013, Date Mailed: Apr. 1, 2015; 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,563, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2014, 41 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,546; Non-Final Office Action; Date Filed: Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Apr. 15, 2014; 32 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,532, Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2014, 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,542, Non-Final Office Action dated May 23, 2014, 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,868, Non-Final Office Actin dated May 14, 2014, 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,872, Non-Final Office Action dated May 8, 2014, 32 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001224; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 7, 2013, 7 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001267, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 14, 2013, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,596, Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014, 28 pages. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001013; International Filing Date Feb. 22, 2013; Date of Mailing: May 14, 2013; 2 pages. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001240; International Filing Date Feb. 28, 2013; Date of Mailing: May 14, 2013; 3 pages. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001262; International Filing Date Mar. 1, 2013; Date of Mailing: May 7, 2013; 2 pages. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001264; International Filing Date Mar. 1, 2013; Date of Mailing: May 14, 2013; 3 pages. |
| International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001268; International Filing Date Mar. 1, 2013; Date of Mailing: May 7, 2013; 2 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001009 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 14, 2013, 5 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001016 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 14, 2013, 6 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001379 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 14, 2013, 5 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001412 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 14, 2013, 6 pages. |
| International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001464 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 14, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001013 mailed May 14, 2013; 3 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001240 mailed May 14, 2013; 3 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001262 mailed May 7, 2013; 3 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001264 mailed May 14, 2013; 3 pages. |
| Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/JP2013/001268 mailed May 7, 2013; 3 pages. |
| Yoshioka Hirotaka, Developing memory profiling tools, Interface, Aug. 1, 2003, Vo. 29, No. 8, pp. 132-142. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/785,089; Notice of Allowance; Date Filed: Mar. 5, 2013; Date Mailed: Jul. 29, 2014; 31 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,538; Notice of Allowance: Date Filed Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Jul. 29, 2014; 33 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,546; Notice of Allowance; Date Filed: Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: Aug. 4, 2014; 16 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,872, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 19, 2014, 43 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,577, Non-Final Office Action; Date Filed Mar. 16, 2014; Date Mailed: Jul. 29, 2014; 58 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,868; Final Office Action; Date Filed: Mar. 5, 2013; Date Mailed: Oct. 1, 2014; 46 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,550 Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2014, 46 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,552 Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2014, 55 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,588 Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2014, 74 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,596 Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 7, 2014, 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,563 Final Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014, 39 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/788,490 Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 1, 2014, 27 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,596, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2014, 39 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, POU920120015EP1, Mailing Date: Jun. 25, 2015; 8 pages. |
| Hassan Shojania, “Hardware-based performance monitoring with VTune Performance Analyzerunder Linux”, 2003, pp. 1-12. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/788,368 Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2015, 22 pages. |
| William E. Cohen, “Tuning Programs with OProfile”, Wide Open Magazine, 2004, pp. 53-61. |
| Intel, “IA-32 Intel Architecture Software Developer's Manual”; Jun. 2005; 13 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,589; Non-Final Office Action; Date Filed: Mar. 16, 20112; Date Mailed: May 11, 2015; 72 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/422,598; Non-Final Office Action, Date Filed: Mar. 16, 2012; Date Mailed: May 6, 2015; 73 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/785,089; Notice of Allowance; Date Filed: Mar. 5, 2013; Date Mailed: Apr. 24, 2015; 34 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/788,368 Final Office Action dated May 12, 2015, 25 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,283; Non-Final Office Action, Date Filed: Mar. 11, 2013; Date Mailed May 7, 2015; 86 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201380014676.X, Mailed Apr. 18, 2016; 11 pages. |
| Chinese Office Action for Chinese Application Serial No. 201380014669.X, Mailed Apr. 14, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130246747 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13422577 | Mar 2012 | US |
| Child | 13790157 | US |
