This application claims priority to PCT Patent Application No. PCT/CN2013/089171 filed Dec. 12, 2013, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
1. Technical Field
Aspects of the present invention relate to a safety system for use in a drive system, and more particularly relate to a safety system for use in a passenger conveyance system such as an escalator system or a moving sidewalk system.
2. Background Information
It is known to provide a safety system for use in a drive system. There is a need for improved safety systems that operate at a high safety integrity level, and that are relatively inexpensive and relatively easy to implement. Aspects of the present invention are directed to an improved safety system for use in a drive system.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a safety system configured for use in a drive system includes a first safety sensor, a second safety sensor, and a safety device. The first safety sensor is operable to provide a first sensor signal indicative of a safety condition of the drive system, and the second safety sensor is operable to provide a second sensor signal indicative of the safety condition. The safety device is operable to process the first and second sensor signals to determine a safety state of the drive system. The safety device is operable to control a unit of the drive system based on the safety state. The safety device includes a multi-core processor that includes a first processing core and a second processing core. The first processing core is operable to receive the first sensor signal from the first safety sensor, and the second processing core is operable to receive the second sensor signal from the second safety sensor. The first and second processing cores are operable to process the respective first and second sensor signals to determine the safety state of the drive system.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a safety system configured for use in a drive system includes safety sensors that are operable to detect a safety condition of the drive system and that are operable to provide sensor signals indicative thereof to a safety processing unit. The safety processing unit includes a multi-core processor operable to process the sensor signals to determine a safety state of the drive system. The multi-core processor is operable to provide safety signals to a safety control unit. The safety signals are indicative of a safety state of the drive system. The safety control unit is operable to control at least one of a drive unit and a brake unit based on the safety signals.
Additionally or alternatively, the present invention may include one or more of the following features individually or in combination:
These and other aspects of the present invention will become apparent in light of the drawings and detailed description provided below.
Referring to
The safety system 10 can be configured for use in various types of drive systems. For example, the drive system can be a moving sidewalk system, an escalator system, an elevator system, or another type of passenger conveyance system.
The safety system 10 includes a plurality of safety sensors 12, 14, a safety device 16, a drive unit 18, and a first brake unit 20. The safety device 16 is operable to receive signals from the safety sensors 12, 14, the signals being indicative of a safety condition of the drive system (e.g., the speed of a component of the drive system, etc.). The safety device 16 is operable to process the signals received from the safety sensors 12, 14 to determine a safety state (e.g., a safe state, an unsafe state, etc.) of the drive system. The safety device 16 is operable to control one or both of the drive unit 18 and the first brake unit 20 based on the safety state of the drive system. In some embodiments, the safety system 10 additionally includes one or both of a safety chain 22 and a second brake unit 24. In embodiments that include a safety chain 22, the safety device 16 is operable to receive a signal from the safety chain 22, the signal being indicative of a safety state (e.g., a safe state, an unsafe state, etc.) of the drive system. In such embodiments, the safety device 16 is operable to control one or both of the drive unit 18 and the first brake unit 20 based on the signal received from the safety chain 22. In embodiments that include a second brake unit 24, the safety device 16 is operable to control the second brake unit 24 based on the safety state of the drive system.
Each of the safety sensors 12, 14 is operable to provide a signal indicative of a safety condition of the drive system. In some embodiments, for example, each of the safety sensors 12, 14 is operable to provide a signal indicative of the speed of a component (e.g., an escalator step, etc.) included in the drive system. In other embodiments, each of the safety sensors 12, 14 is operable to provide a signal indicative of the presence (or absence) of a component (e.g., an escalator step, etc.) of the drive system. The number of safety sensors 12, 14 included in the safety system 10 can vary; however, the safety system 10 includes at least two safety sensors 12, 14 that are operable to provide a signal indicative of the same safety condition of the drive system. In the embodiment illustrated in
The safety device 16 includes a safety processing unit 26 and a safety control unit 28.
The safety processing unit 26 includes a multi-core processor that includes at least a first processing core 30 and a second processing core 32. The phrase “multi-core processor” and variations thereof are used herein to indicate that the first and second processing cores 30, 32 are disposed on the same integrated circuit die. The first processing core 30 is operable to receive signals from one or both of the at least two redundant safety sensors 12, 14, and the second processing core 32 is operable to receive signals from one or both of the at least two redundant safety sensors 12, 14. In the embodiment illustrated in
The inclusion of the multi-core processor in the safety processing unit 26 can be advantageous for various reasons. For example, the first and second processing cores 30, 32 of the multi-core processor can process the signals received from the at least two redundant safety sensors 12, 14 in parallel, and thus can enable the safety system 10 to operate at a higher safety integrity level than would be possible if the respective signals were instead processed by the same single-core processor. Also, the multi-core processor can be cheaper and easier to implement than other designs that include multiple single-core processors. The phrase “single-core processor” is used herein to mean a processor that includes only one processing core disposed on an integrated circuit die.
The functionality of the safety processing unit 26 can be implemented using hardware (e.g., programmable processors, non-transitory computer readable storage mediums, etc.), software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the safety processing unit 26 can perform one or more of the functions described herein by executing software, which can be stored, for example, in a ROM unit included in the safety processing unit 26. A person having ordinary skill in the art would be able to adapt (e.g., program, etc.) the safety processing unit 26 to perform the functionality described herein without undue experimentation.
The safety control unit 28 is operable to receive signals from the safety processing unit 26, the signals being indicative of a safety state (e.g., a safe state, an unsafe state, etc.) of the drive system. The safety control unit 28 is operable to control one or both of the drive unit 18 and the first brake unit 20 based on the signals received from the safety processing unit 26. In embodiments that include a safety chain 22, the safety control unit 28 is operable to receive a signal from the safety chain 22, the signals being indicative of a safety state of the drive system. In such embodiments, the safety control unit 28 is operable to control one or both of the drive unit 18 and the first brake unit 20 based on the signal received from the safety chain 22.
The safety control unit 28 can function in various different ways. In some embodiments, for example, the signals received by the safety control unit 28 can indicate that the drive system is being operated in an unsafe state when a safety condition has not been satisfied, and in response the safety control unit 28 can stop the operation of the drive unit 18 by electrically disconnecting its power source, and can electrically initiate an actuator that moves the first brake unit 20 from a non-braking position to a braking position. In some embodiments, the safety control unit 28 is operable to detect an inconsistency between the signals provided by the safety processing unit 26. In such embodiments, for example, the safety control unit 28 is operable to detect an inconsistency between the respective signals provided by the first and second processing cores 30, 32 of the multi-core processor included in the safety processing unit 26. In such embodiments, the safety control unit 28 can interpret such an inconsistency to mean that the drive system is being operated in an unsafe state.
The functionality of the safety control unit 28 can be implemented using hardware (e.g., programmable processors, relays, switches, non-transitory computer readable storage mediums, etc.), software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the safety control unit 28 can perform one or more of the functions described herein by executing software, which can be stored, for example, in a ROM unit included in the safety control unit 28. A person having ordinary skill in the art would be able to adapt (e.g., program, etc.) the safety control unit 28 to perform the functionality described herein without undue experimentation. Although the safety control unit 28 is described herein as being separate from the safety processing unit 26, in some embodiments the safety control unit 28, or one or more features thereof, can be implemented as a feature of the safety processing unit 26.
The drive unit 18 is operable to drive (e.g., rotationally drive, etc.) a component (e.g., a conveyor band, an escalator step, etc.) of the drive system. The first brake unit 20 is operable to brake a component (e.g., a conveyor band, an escalator step, etc.) of the drive system. In embodiments in which the safety system 10 includes a second brake unit 24, the second brake unit 24 also is operable to brake a component (e.g., a conveyor band, an escalator step, etc.) of the drive system. In such embodiments, the first brake unit 20 can be a primary brake unit, and the second brake unit 24 can be an emergency brake unit or an auxiliary brake unit.
In embodiments in which the safety system 10 additionally includes a safety chain 22, the structure and functionality of the safety chain 22 can vary, and in some embodiments can be the same as or similar to the structure and functionality of other safety chains that are known in the art.
The safety system 10 can operate in various different ways. In some embodiments, for example, during operation of the drive system, the safety sensors 12, 14 periodically detect a safety condition of the drive system and periodically provide signals indicative thereof to the safety processing unit 26 of the safety device 16; the multi-core processor included in the safety processing unit 26 processes the signals received from the safety sensors 12, 14 to determine a safety state of the drive system; the multi-core processor periodically provides signals to the safety control unit 28 indicative of the safety state of the drive system; and the safety control unit 28 controls one or both of the drive unit 18 and the first brake unit 20 based on the signal received from the safety processing unit 26.
While several embodiments have been disclosed, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that aspects of the present invention include many more embodiments and implementations. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention are not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents. It will also be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that variations and modifications can be made without departing from the true scope of the present disclosure. For example, in some instances, one or more features disclosed in connection with one embodiment can be used alone or in combination with one or more features of one or more other embodiments.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2013/089171 | 12/12/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/085527 | 6/18/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4567560 | Polis | Jan 1986 | A |
5526256 | Sakata et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
6173814 | Herkel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6230871 | Balzer-Apke | May 2001 | B1 |
6267219 | Spannhake et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273234 | Balzer-Apke et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6580991 | Disser | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6666319 | Balzer-Apke | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6758319 | Lange et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766893 | Neumann et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6827196 | Wiesinger et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6966419 | Tada | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971496 | Nurnberg et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7407048 | Boom | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7533763 | Kattainen | May 2009 | B2 |
7574271 | Steindl et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7950514 | Nurnberg et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
20030000798 | Williams et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030168311 | Balzer-Apke et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20110011700 | Plathin et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20140027210 | Rogers | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102092608 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102452595 | May 2012 | CN |
2246285 | Nov 2010 | EP |
WO2004076326 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2006090470 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO2006106575 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office action for CN201380081521.8 dated May 2, 2017. |
EP search report for EP13899016.3 dated Aug. 22, 2017. |
Office action for CN201380081521.8 dated Oct. 10, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160318735 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |