The invention relates to a saw blade comprising a body of hard material with the features of the preamble of the independent saw blade claim and a method to produce a saw blade with the features of the preamble of the independent method claim.
In the prior art, there are only very limited possible shapes for the teeth of saw blades with a cutting portion made of hard material. Conventional tooth shapes may give good lifetime results with respect to the cutting of steel, however, achievable feed rates are low. With respect to other materials such as wood or plastics, feed rate and cutting performance are even worse.
The object of the present invention is to provide saw blade comprising a body of hard material and a method to produce a saw blade in which these drawbacks are overcome.
Hard material is understood to be a material chosen from the group consisting of hard metal, high speed steel and/or ceramic. Hard metal is understood to be a composite material comprising cemented carbide (mostly tungsten carbide, WC) with a metal binder phase (usually Cobalt, Co).
This object is accomplished according to the invention by providing a saw blade with the features of the independent saw blade claim and a method to produce a saw blade with the features of the independent method claim. Preferred embodiments of the invention are defined in the dependent claims. A preferred use of a saw blade according to the invention is for cutting wood, soft metals (such as aluminum or magnesium) or plastics.
The invention provides a tooth geometry with excellent cutting performance and at the same time good manufacturability.
The invention provides
It is further provided that in that the first direction and the second direction are inclined to each other such that along the length of the cutting portion at least some of the grooves of the first plurality of grooves are intersected by a groove of the second plurality of grooves.
As the shape of the teeth is determined by the geometry of the grooves, the inventive arrangement of grooves results in an improvement of the shape of the teeth.
The first plurality of grooves being “intersected” by a groove of the second type of groove means that the second plurality of grooves crosses and thereby cuts into at least a part of the first plurality of grooves. Thereby, the appearance of a part or all of the grooves of the first plurality of grooves is altered.
In other words, the characteristic of the groove/tooth geometry of the saw blade results from the superimposition of the first plurality of grooves and the second plurality of grooves.
By way of example, the second plurality of groove may modify a groove base of the first plurality of grooves, or their flanks, or both.
It is understood that the second plurality of grooves may have the same groove shape and size as the first type of grooves (of the first plurality of grooves). It can be foreseen, however, that the second type of grooves differs from the first in terms of shape and/or size.
The resulting tooth shape provides an even distribution of cutting forces onto the individual cutting teeth. Also beneficial is the good chip evacuation with the inventive tooth design, the teeth shape resulting from the arrangement of the grooves.
According to an embodiment, the first direction and the second direction are inclined to a direction that is parallel to the width of the cutting portion and are inclined to a direction that is parallel to the length of the cutting portion.
It can be foreseen, however, that one of the first direction and the second direction is parallel to the width of the cutting portion. In other words, in this latter option, one type of grooves is parallel to the width of the cutting portion. In this case, one type of grooves is essentially perpendicular to an oscillating/reciprocating movement of the saw blade.
According to an embodiment it is provided that along the length of the cutting portion, grooves of the first plurality of grooves which are intersected by grooves of the second plurality of grooves are alternated with grooves of the first plurality of grooves which are not intersected by a groove of the second plurality of grooves.
In other words, according to this embodiment, not all of the grooves of the first plurality of grooves are crossed by the second type of grooves.
Grooves of the first type (grooves of the first plurality of grooves) can be followed by the second type directly, that is in an “A-B-A-B-A-B etc.” order, or the sequence may be different, for example an “A-A-B-A-A-B-A-A-B etc.” order, “A” and “B” thereby denoting grooves of the first or the second type.
According to yet another embodiment it is provided that along the length of the cutting portion two or three adjacent grooves of the first plurality of grooves are intersected by one groove of the second plurality of grooves. As it will be explained in more detail by way of the attached drawings, the orientation of the second plurality of grooves is chosen such that one groove of the second plurality of grooves crosses two or more grooves of the first type of grooves. It can be understood that the resulting grooves differ from each other as the second groove crosses at different lateral position of the grooves of the first plurality of grooves. Thus, more than two groove characteristics can be realized.
Preferably it is provided that an angle between the first direction and the second direction lies in a range of about 1° to about 90°, preferably in a range of about 5° to about 45°, especially preferred in a range of about 10° to about 30°.
It has been shown that within the above angle ranges especially balanced cutting properties of the saw blade can be achieved.
Preferably it is provided that a distance between grooves of the second plurality of grooves is larger than a distance between grooves of the first plurality of grooves, preferably the distance between grooves of the second plurality of grooves is double the distance between grooves of the first plurality of grooves.
In other words, along a given longitudinal distance of the saw blade, there are more grooves of the type of the first plurality of grooves than of the other type of grooves. In a yet preferable variant, the number of the first groove type would be double the number of the second type.
It can be provided that a cross section of each of the grooves of the first plurality of grooves which are not intersected by a groove of the second plurality of grooves is basically V-shaped.
As grinding is the preferred option of forming the grooves, the (initial) groove shape follows the shape of the grinding wheel.
Preferably, all the grooves of the plurality of grooves are equally shaped.
Even more preferred, the grooves of the second type (of the second plurality of grooves) have the same initial shape, e.g. described as cross section, as the grooves of the first plurality of grooves. Obviously, its initial shape is not necessarily directly visible at the saw blade—as it is superimposed with the other groove type—but it still can be determined by analysis of the final groove shape.
According to a variant, the cross section of the grooves of the second type (of the second plurality of grooves) have a different initial or imaginary shape to the shape of grooves of the first plurality of grooves. For example, the shape of the grooves of the second type may be a more acute V-shape than the V-shape of the first type of grooves.
In a preferred embodiment it is provided that the cross-section of the body of hard material widens into a direction of the cutting teeth tips. The cross-section of the body may be of trapezoidal shape. The effect of this preferred shape is that the saw blade has a side clearance in its feed direction. This leads to reduced friction during operation of a saw blade equipped with said body of hard metal.
In ductile materials such as steel, by contrast, a side clearance is realized by the so-called tooth-set (German: “Schränkung”). According to this technique, the individual teeth of a saw blade are plastically bent alternatingly to the left and to the right (with respect to the longitudinal direction of the blade) to create a cutting width broader than the metal strip the blade is made from.
The present preferred embodiment thus provides a side clearance solution for hard and brittle materials.
As an alternative to grinding the grooves or teeth could be realized by electroerosion or direct pressing. However, grinding is preferred.
In an embodiment it can be provided that lateral sides (flanks) of adjacent teeth which together form a groove (in other words the flanks facing each other) are either both faceted (consist each of at least two angled partial plane surfaces) or are both formed by a single plane surface.
The saw blade according to the invention has an aggressive tooth design and cuts very effectively. As compared to conventional full-steel saw blades, the inventive saw blades show increased service life and improved edge retention.
The saw blade can be in the form of an oscillating or reciprocating saw blade, such as an oscillating blade saw, a jig saw, or a saber saw.
Further, the invention provides a very cost-effective way to manufacture saw blades comprising a body of a hard material, in particular saw blades comprising a body of hard metal.
The inventive method to produce a saw blade, in particular a saw blade according to at least one of the preceding embodiments, is done by grinding a surface of a body of hard material to form a plurality of teeth, the surface having a length and a width. The method uses at least one grinding tool having a plurality of spaced grinding surfaces which are parallel to each other along a grinding direction. In a first step the grinding tool is applied to the surface in a first grinding direction that is preferably inclined to a direction which is parallel to the width of the surface. In a further step a grinding tool having a plurality of spaced grinding surfaces which are parallel to each other along a grinding direction is applied to the surface in a second grinding direction that is preferably inclined to the direction which is parallel to the width of the surface and is inclined to the first grinding direction.
It can be provided that with respect to grinding there are only the first step, the second step and the further step.
It can be provided that a grinding tool with equally spaced grinding surfaces is used.
It can be provided that at least in two of the following steps: first step, second step and further step, the same grinding tool is used.
Both directions, d1 and d2, are inclined with respect to each other and with respect to a direction dW that is parallel to the width W of the cutting portion 3 and with respect to a direction dL that is parallel to the length L of the cutting portion 3.
Teeth of the cutting portion 3 are being formed as flanks of the grooves 4, 5. It can be seen that in this embodiment lateral sides of adjacent teeth which together form a groove 4, 5 are either both faceted or are both formed by a single plane surface.
It can be seen that in the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
The resulting groove/tooth characteristic provides for aggressive cutting performance and thus high feed rates.
In the embodiment of
In the present example the directions d1 and d2 are both chosen at large angles. It has been found that the resulting groove/tooth characteristic shows low friction. This leads to reduced power consumption and reduced frictional heat.
In the embodiment of
During operation, the saw blade oscillates or reciprocates along the oscillation direction O. Commonly one speaks of oscillation when the displacements are very small, typically in the range of a few millimeters, while in case of reciprocating saws the displacements measure several millimeters.
In use, the saw blade moves through a workpiece in feed direction F at a certain feed rate.
In
In the first step the grinding tool is applied to the surface in a first grinding direction dg1 that is inclined to a direction dW which is parallel to the width W of the surface. A first subset of the first plurality of equidistant, parallel grooves 4 is being ground, the grooves 4 having a distance 2*G1 from each other.
Then, as a second step, the grinding tool is being offset with respect to the surface along the length L of the surface, the offset corresponding to half of a distance between the spaced grinding surfaces of the grinding tool, that is half tooth pitch. A second subset of the first plurality of equidistant, parallel grooves 4 is being ground, the grooves 4 having a distance G1 from each other. The situation shown in
As shown above, through a further grinding operation offset to the first grinding operation the resulting tooth pitch can be halved as it would result from one grinding operation alone. It shall be noted that the offset can be chosen other than half the distance between the spaced grinding surfaces of the grinding tool, that is, other than half tooth pitch, resulting unequally spaced grooves 4 respectively teeth.
In a third step (
Production of the saw blade is now finished. In this embodiment only three grinding steps (first step, second step and further step) had to be used.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18178426 | Jun 2018 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/060906 | 4/29/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/242918 | 12/26/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
108040 | Milliman | Oct 1870 | A |
211259 | Robbins et al. | Jan 1879 | A |
211346 | Robbins | Jan 1879 | A |
229772 | Suisse | Jul 1880 | A |
391843 | Gray | Oct 1888 | A |
775012 | McLean | Nov 1904 | A |
886296 | Howatson | Apr 1908 | A |
1523518 | Dragon | Jan 1925 | A |
1566880 | Kelley | Dec 1925 | A |
1690803 | Vander Wee | Nov 1928 | A |
1771722 | Prentice | Jul 1930 | A |
2252869 | Shortell et al. | Aug 1941 | A |
2351737 | Blum | Jun 1944 | A |
2718245 | Owen et al. | Sep 1955 | A |
3631906 | Forslund | Jan 1972 | A |
3663316 | Kulmburg | May 1972 | A |
4015331 | Balke | Apr 1977 | A |
4232096 | Franzen | Nov 1980 | A |
4265285 | Fodor | May 1981 | A |
4311075 | Sundstrom | Jan 1982 | A |
5361665 | Sonefors | Nov 1994 | A |
5423845 | McDaniel | Jun 1995 | A |
5687484 | Hahn | Nov 1997 | A |
5848473 | Brandenburg, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855157 | Okamura et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6427573 | Carlsen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
D745351 | Tyner | Dec 2015 | S |
10245747 | Miyawaki | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10414063 | Miyawaki | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20010015120 | Hickey | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020124708 | Hakansson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20080163735 | Lundin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20110154970 | Oshibe | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20140157607 | McFarland | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
16111 | Jan 2019 | AT |
1119575 | Apr 1996 | CN |
1169687 | Jan 1998 | CN |
1198979 | Nov 1998 | CN |
106536140 | Mar 2017 | CN |
107921655 | Apr 2018 | CN |
3445206 | Jun 1986 | DE |
19712448 | Sep 1998 | DE |
10303915 | Aug 2004 | DE |
2383627 | Jun 2012 | ES |
S526194 | Jan 1977 | JP |
04122601 | Apr 1992 | JP |
H06155401 | Jun 1994 | JP |
H081605 | Jan 1996 | JP |
2013052575 | Mar 2013 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Li Wenbin et al.: “Development of Forestry Engineering Research”, Chinese Environmental Science Press, May 2005, pp. 138-139—Statement of Relevance. |
Fu Chaochen: “Material Preparation Saw Technology”, Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, Dec. 1983, p. 21—Statement of Relevance. |
Li Wenbin et al.: “Development of Forestry Engineering Research”, Chinese Environmental Science Press, May 2005, pp. 138-139—English Translation. |
Fu Chaochen: “Material Preparation Saw Technology”, Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, Dec. 1983, p. 21—English Translation. |
Xiao Zhoufu et al. “Wood cutting toolkit”, p. 299-302, the Northeast Forestry University Publisher, Dec. 1992—English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210129243 A1 | May 2021 | US |