The present disclosure relates generally to a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) die, and more particularly to MEMS die having an internal space that is under vacuum and sealed.
It is known that in the fabrication of MEMS devices often a plurality of devices are manufactured in a single batch process wherein individual portions of the batch process representative of individual MEMS devices are known as dies. Accordingly, a number of MEMS dies can be manufactured in a single batch process and then cut apart or otherwise separated for further fabrication steps or for their ultimate use, which for example without limitation includes use as an acoustic transducer or other portion of a microphone.
MEMS dies having a vacuum sealed between two or more layers are known. However, problems exist with the currently known process for manufacturing such dies and further with the quality of the dies thereby produced. Problems with known manufacturing processes include incomplete or uneven release of sacrificial material from between the layers, which can result in excess material remaining between the layers. Such excess material can have a detrimental effect on the performance of a device ultimately made from the die, for example, by interfering with the motion of the layers or otherwise degrading the response of the layers to external stimuli. Further problems with known processes include inadequate sealing of the vacuum between the layers after the sacrificial material has been released, and the unintended addition of stresses to the layers by the presence of sealing structures disposed thereon. A need therefore exists for a process that can be used in making a MEMS die having a vacuum sealed between two or more layers that provides an adequate seal for the space between the layers without adding unwanted stress to the layers or leaving behind excess material in the sealed vacuum between the layers. It would be beneficial if such a process could further be easily manufacturable to reduce complexity, and therefore cost and time of production.
The foregoing and other features of the present disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. These drawings depict only several embodiments in accordance with the disclosure and are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope.
In the following detailed description, various embodiments are described with reference to the appended drawings. The skilled person will understand that the accompanying drawings are schematic and simplified for clarity. Like reference numerals refer to like elements or components throughout. Like elements or components will therefore not necessarily be described in detail with respect to each figure.
A MEMS diaphragm for example, for an acoustic transducer, can be a single monolithic layer of material or can be made from two or more layers of material. In some embodiments, the diaphragm is made from two or more layers of material containing a sealed space therebetween that is sealed under vacuum. Such a structure having a vacuum between the layers can provide an improvement in performance by removing the effect of air damping that would otherwise be caused by air trapped between the layers.
In some embodiments, a multi-layered MEMS diaphragm containing a vacuum between the layers is structured to include exterior diaphragm layers, for example top and bottom layers, that are connected by a supporting structure to inhibit collapse or deformation of the exterior diaphragm layers due to external air pressure. In such an embodiment a backplate layer is disposed between the exterior diaphragm layers so that the backplate layer is fixed and the exterior diaphragm layers move relative to the fixed backplate layer.
According to an embodiment, a MEMS die includes a substrate having an opening formed therein, and a diaphragm attached around a periphery thereof to the substrate and over the opening, wherein the diaphragm comprises first and second spaced apart layers. A backplate is disposed between the first and second spaced apart layers. One or more columnar supports are disposed through holes disposed through the backplate and connecting the first and second spaced apart layers. At least a partial vacuum exists between at least a portion of the first and second spaced apart layers. The first layer further comprises interior and exterior sub-layers at least proximate to each of the one or more columnar supports, wherein the interior sub-layers include one or more apertures disposed therethrough.
According to an embodiment, a microphone device includes a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) acoustic transducer, comprising a substrate having an opening formed therein, and a diaphragm attached around a periphery thereof to the substrate and over the opening, wherein the diaphragm comprises first and second spaced apart layers. A backplate is disposed between the first and second spaced apart layers. One or more columnar supports are disposed through holes disposed through the backplate and connecting the first and second spaced apart layers. At least a partial vacuum exists between at least a portion of the first and second spaced apart layers. The first layer further comprises interior and exterior sub-layers at least proximate to each of the one or more columnar supports, wherein the interior sub-layers include one or more apertures disposed therethrough. The microphone device further includes a base having a first surface, an opposing second surface, and a port, wherein the port extends between the first surface and the second surface. An integrated circuit (IC) is disposed on the first surface of the base. The MEMS acoustic transducer is also disposed on the first surface of the base. A cover is disposed over the first surface of the base covering the MEMS acoustic transducer and the IC.
In an embodiment, a MEMS die includes a diaphragm comprising first and second spaced apart layers, a first pierce disposed through the first layer and a second pierce disposed through the second layer, wherein the first and second pierces are in fluid communication. In another embodiment, a backplate is disposed between the first and second spaced apart layers and one or more columnar supports are disposed through holes disposed through the backplate and connecting the first and second spaced apart layers. The MEMS die further comprises interior and exterior sub-layers at least proximate to each of the one or more columnar supports, wherein the interior sub-layer includes one or more apertures disposed therethrough, and wherein the one or more apertures are configured as one or more holes arranged proximate to the one or more columnar supports.
Turning to
In an embodiment the diaphragm 106 comprises first and second spaced apart layers 106A and 106B. In an embodiment, a backplate 102 is disposed between the first and second spaced apart layers 106A and 106B. In an embodiment the backplate 102 is attached around a periphery thereof to spacers 104 disposed between the first and second spaced apart layers 106A and 106B. In an embodiment, both the diaphragm 106 and the backplate 102 are circular in a top plan view (as viewed along the arrow labeled A in
In an embodiment the optional spacer 108 has a curved interior wall 108A. The diaphragm 106 is fully constrained (by the optional second spacer 108 and the spacers 104) along a boundary that is defined by a curve along which the interior wall 104A of the spacer 104 meets the diaphragm 106. The substrate 110 also has a curved interior wall 110A, which defines the opening 116 that extends through the substrate 110 to the surrounding environment. In an embodiment, the spacers 104 and the optional spacer 108 are part of the sacrificial material of the MEMS die 100, for example, the same material comprising the plug 140 described hereinbelow, and the walls 104A and 108A of the spacers are made from a time-limited etch front of the sacrificial material. In another embodiment the spacers 104 and the optional spacer 108 are made of the insulative material 109 as further described hereinbelow.
In an embodiment at least a portion 112 of the space between the first and second spaced apart layers 106A and 106B is sealed from the environment, and at least a partial vacuum exists in the sealed portion 112. However, in an embodiment, at least one passage 114 is disposed entirely through the diaphragm 106 providing fluid communication between the opening 116 and an opposite side 118 of the diaphragm 106. In an embodiment a first pierce 114A of any cross-sectional shape as is desired or otherwise known in the art is disposed through the first layer 106A and a second pierce 114B of any cross-sectional shape as is desired or otherwise known in the art is disposed through the second layer 106B, wherein the first and second pierces 114A and 114B are in fluid communication. One or more columnar supports 120 are disposed through holes 122 disposed through the backplate 102 and connecting the first and second spaced apart layers 106A and 106B.
The passage 114 allows for pressure equalization between the opposite side 118 of the diaphragm 106 and the surrounding environment. The passage 114 is important for Low Frequency Roll-Off (LFRO) performance of the transducer, and in some embodiments there can be more than one passage 114 disposed through the diaphragm 106.
Referring now to
Still referring to
By locating the one or more apertures 134 through the interior sub-layer 130 that is at least proximate to each of the one or more columnar supports 120, post-release sealing structures (as described further hereinbelow) can be located on top of the one or more columnar supports 120. This structure provides an advantage over known multi-layer MEMS vacuum diaphragms which have release apertures and associated sealing structures on a surface of the diaphragm where such release apertures can leave excess sacrificial material on an inside of the diaphragm, and further where such sealing structures can detrimentally cause an undesirable stress concentration on the surface of the diaphragm. Locating the apertures 134 and the associated post-release sealing structures to near the tops of the columnar supports 120 solves both these issues.
Referring now to
In terms of particular material types the insulative material 109 can be any insulative material as known in the art that would not be damaged during a sacrificial layer removal process. For example, without limitation, the insulative material 109 can be Silicon Nitride, Silicon Oxynitride, metal oxides, materials that are not damaged by a sacrificial layer removal process, and combinations thereof.
Similarly, the conductive material 107 can be any conductive material as known in the art that would not be damaged during a sacrificial layer removal process. For example, without limitation, the conductive material 107 can be Polycrystalline Silicon, one or more metals, alloys of metals, carbon, materials that are not damaged by a sacrificial layer removal process, and combinations thereof.
Referring now to
In an embodiment the opening 138 is covered and filled by a plug 140 of a first sealing material 142. The first sealing material 142 can be any sealing material as known in the art that can be removed by dry or wet base sacrificial layer release tools. For example, without limitation, the first sealing material 142 can be Silicon Oxide, polyimide, materials that can be removed by dry or wet base sacrificial release tools, and combinations thereof. In an embodiment the plug 140 of the first sealing material 142 is further covered by at least a layer 144 of a second sealing material 146. The second sealing material 146 can be any material as described above for the first sealing material 142 and can be the same as or different from the first sealing material 142. For example, in an embodiment the plug 140 and the layer 144 are made from two different sealing materials.
As shown in
In an embodiment, each of the columnar supports 120 has an exterior portion 156 comprised of a conductive material 107, which can be but isn't necessarily be the same type of conductive material 107 as used for the diaphragm first and second layers 106A and 106B. An interior portion 158 of each of the columnar supports 120 in an embodiment comprises a fill material 160 as known in the art, and that may be, for example without limitation, Silicon Oxide. A cover portion 162 of each columnar support 120 disposed between the plug 140 and the interior portion 158 and overlying the interior sub-layer 130 comprises a layer of insulative material 109 as described above. The one or more apertures 134 disposed through the interior sub-layer 130 are also disposed through the cover layer 162.
Referring now to
During operation of the MEMS die 100, for example as an acoustic transducer 100, electric charge is applied to the conductive layer of the backplate 102 and to the conductive layers 106A and 106B of the diaphragm 106 thereby inducing an electric field between the backplate 102 and the layers 106A and 106B of the diaphragm 106 and creating an electrostatic bias on the layers 106A and 106B of the diaphragm 106. Movement of the air (e.g., resulting from sound waves) pushes against the outer surface of the diaphragm 106 facing the opening 116 causing the layers 106A and 106B of the diaphragm 106 to deflect (enter a deflection state) and to deform. This deformation causes a change in the capacitance between the backplate 102 and the layers 106A and 106B of the diaphragm 106 which can be detected and interpreted as sound.
Turning to
As shown in
The assembly 300 includes an electrical circuit disposed within the enclosed volume 308. In an embodiment, the electrical circuit includes an integrated circuit (IC) 310. In an embodiment the IC 310 is disposed on the first surface 305 of the base 302. The IC 310 may be an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). Alternatively, the IC 310 may include a semiconductor die integrating various analog, analog-to-digital, and/or digital circuits. In an embodiment the cover 304 is disposed over the first surface 305 of the base 302 covering the MEMS acoustic transducer 100 and the IC 310.
In the assembly 300 of
As noted hereinabove, a plurality of MEMS devices can be manufactured in a single batch process. Individual portions of the batch process representative of individual MEMS devices are known as dies. Accordingly, a number of MEMS dies can be manufactured in a single batch process and then cut apart or otherwise separated for further fabrication steps or for their ultimate use, which for example without limitation includes as an acoustic transducer or other portion of a microphone.
Steps in a production process utilized to produce the MEMS die 100 as described hereinabove include etching, masking, patterning, cutting, boring, and/or release steps executed on a workpiece as are known in the art of producing layered MEMS devices. Accordingly, all of the steps are not described in detail herein. However, generally the portions of the MEMS die 100 that ultimately end up as the sealed portion 112 are layered onto the workpiece using sacrificial material, and are covered by the conductive material 107 that ultimately comprises the first spaced apart layer 106A and the interior sub-layer 130 thereof. Material for the cover layer 162 is applied over regions above the columnar posts 120 and the one or more apertures 134 as described hereinabove are created through the material of the cover layer 162 and the interior sub-layer 130. Next, the sacrificial material disposed beneath the material of the first spaced apart layer 106A and the interior sub-layer 130 is released as is known in the art through the one or more apertures 134 and the opening 138. At this point in the production process, the workpiece is exposed to a desired level of vacuum during application of at least the layers 140 and 144 of material as described hereinabove over the openings 138 to seal and maintain vacuum within the sealed portion 112.
With respect to the use of plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
Unless otherwise noted, the use of the words “approximate,” “about,” “around,” “substantially,” etc., mean plus or minus ten percent.
The foregoing description of illustrative embodiments has been presented for purposes of illustration and of description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or limiting with respect to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the disclosed embodiments. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4154115 | Hartung et al. | May 1979 | A |
4435986 | Choffat | Mar 1984 | A |
6075867 | Bay et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6431003 | Stark et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435033 | Delaye | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6535460 | Loeppert et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6571445 | Ladabaum | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6662663 | Chen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7030407 | Michler | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040173 | Dehe | May 2006 | B2 |
7124638 | Kandler | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150195 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7190038 | Dehe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7470546 | Lehmann | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7489593 | Nguyen-Dinh et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7535156 | Kvisteroy et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7545012 | Smith et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7781249 | Laming et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7793550 | Elian et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7795695 | Weigold et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7825484 | Martin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7829961 | Hsiao | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7903831 | Song | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918135 | Hammerschmidt | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8127619 | Hammerschmidt | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8339764 | Steeneken et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8461655 | Klein et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8575037 | Friza et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8650963 | Barr et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8723277 | Dehe et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8809973 | Theuss | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8969980 | Lee | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8989411 | Hall et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9031266 | Dehe et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9179221 | Barzen et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9181080 | Dehe et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9237402 | Loeppert | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9321630 | Xu et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9332330 | Elian et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9380381 | Straeussnigg et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9383282 | Besling et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9383285 | Phan et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9425757 | Straeussnigg et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9432759 | Elian et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9438979 | Dehe | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9510107 | Dehe et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9516428 | Dehe et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9549263 | Uchida | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9550211 | Dirksen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9631996 | Wiesbauer et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9689770 | Hammerschmidt | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9828237 | Walther et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9884757 | Winkler et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9903779 | Hammerschmidt | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9942677 | Wiesbauer et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10129676 | Walther et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10231061 | Dehe et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10322481 | Dehe et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10433070 | Dehe et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10560771 | Dehe et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10582306 | Dehe | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10589990 | Dehe et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10641626 | Bretthauer et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10669151 | Strasser et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10676346 | Walther et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10689250 | Fueldner et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10715926 | Bretthauer et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10939214 | Kuntzman et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
20050177045 | Degertekin et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207605 | Dehe et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219953 | Bayram et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070205492 | Wang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070278501 | Macpherson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080175425 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080267431 | Leidl et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279407 | Pahl | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283942 | Huang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090001553 | Pahl et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090180655 | Tien et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100046780 | Song | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052082 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100128914 | Khenkin | May 2010 | A1 |
20100170346 | Opitz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100173437 | Wygant et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100183181 | Wang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100246877 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290644 | Wu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100322443 | Wu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322451 | Wu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110013787 | Chang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110075875 | Wu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130001550 | Seeger et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140071642 | Theuss | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150090043 | Ruhl et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150247879 | Meinhold | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150296307 | Shao et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160096726 | Dehe et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20180091906 | Khenkin et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180234774 | Walther et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180317022 | Evans et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190071305 | Strasser | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190112182 | Metzger-Brueckl et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190181776 | Tumpold et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190246459 | Tumpold et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190270639 | Lorenz et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190331531 | Glacer et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190339193 | Eberl et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190352175 | Tumpold et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190352176 | Doller | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190363757 | Mikolajczak et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200057031 | Theuss et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103344377 | Oct 2013 | CN |
100571967 | Apr 2006 | KR |
2012085335 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Andrews et al., “A comparison of squeeze-film theory with measurements on a microstructure,” Sensors and Actuators A 36 (1993) 79-87, 9 pages. |
Bay et al., “Design of a silicon microphone with differential read-out of a sealed double parallel-plate capacitor,” Sensors and Acutators A 53 (1996), pp. 232-236, 5 pages. |
Hansen et al., “Wideband micromachined capacitive microphones with radio frequency detection,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (2), Aug. 2004, pp. 828-842, 15 pages. |
Lin, Der-Song, “Interface Engineering of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers for Medical Applications,” A Dissertation Submitted to the Depailment of Mechanical Engineering and the Committee on Graduate Studies of Stanford University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Jun. 2011, 168 pages. |
Park et al., “Fabrication of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers via Local Oxidation and Direct Water Bonding,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 20, No. 1, Feb. 2011, 10 pages. |
Krzysztof Iniewski, “Smart Sensors for Industrial Applications,” Figure 19. 1, p. 306, 1 page (2013). |
Wygant et al., “50 kHz Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers for Generation of Highly Directional Sound with Parametric Arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 56, No. 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 193-203, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220321986 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |