The present invention relates generally to printing documents with magnetic and non-magnetic image elements and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for aligning and printing image elements within a document to create a secure document method and system.
Billions of personal checks, business checks, tickets, pay stubs, vouchers, and other commercial documents are processed each year. The volume of documents being processed continues to increase despite the availability of paperless methods of making payments and/or transferring money.
The susceptibility of printed documents to fraudulent alteration costs the industry billions of dollars each year. Alteration takes the form of printing non-standard documents (forgery) and/or removal, addition or alteration of image elements on original documents. The industry is in need of methods to quickly and accurately assess the authenticity of a document and make document alteration more difficult.
Many schemes exist for printing secure documents. These generally fall into two categories, those that involve substrate manipulation and those that involve addition of image content. Examples of substrate manipulation include US20030211299 A1 which describes a coating for a retroreflective document which renders the surface of the document receptive to toners and inks printed thereon while not substantially interfering with the retroreflective properties of the underlying substrate. Methods for fabricating the document are also provided.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,622A provides a coated cellulosic web product and coating composition which provides enhanced toner adhesion for documents printed using noncontact printing devices such as ion deposition printers. The toner adhesion enhanced coating cellulosic product and composition comprises a cellulosic web having first and second major surfaces with at least one of the major surfaces having coated thereon a layer of a polymeric toner receptor.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,086,708A details a method of making a document, such as a check or stock certificate, having enhanced security against counterfeiting. The document includes a strip of foil having a three dimensional light diffracting image thereon affixed to the document. The strip of foil may be affixed to the document before or after the background printing or face printing of the document is completed. In this manner, the light diffracting strip may be printing on by the background and face printing of the document as desired.
Examples of methods that involve manipulation of image content or imaging materials include US20050282077A1 which describes a toner for printing documents that are difficult to chemically or physically forge and that are readily easy to visually verify and methods of using and forming the toner are disclosed. The toner includes a colorant for printing an image on a surface of a document and a dye for forming a latent version of the image underneath a surface of a substrate. An image formed using the toner of the invention is readily verified by comparing the colorant-formed image and the dye-formed image. In addition, if a solvent is used in an attempt to alter the printed image on the substrate, the dye migrates or diffuses to indicate tampering with the document.
US20050142468A1 describes a method of printing documents, for example bank checks, with a pantograph. Documents printed as described may include a digitally variable pantograph and other enhancements. The invention is particularly useful for enhanced security documents and the production thereof. US20050142469A1 describes a printing system, process and product with microprinting. Documents printed as described may include digitally variable microprint and other enhancements. The invention is particularly useful for enhanced security documents and the production thereof.
Despite these methods of security enhancement, document forgery and manipulation is still a problem.
The present invention provides an electrophotographic printing method and system, which generates documents with magnetic toner image elements with greatly improved resistance to tampering or fraudulent alteration. Document security features are realized by printing one or more non-magnetic toners on a receiver in addition to a magnetic toner where the combination of magnetic and non-magnetic toners is co-printed on the receiver before fixation. Using this method and system a variety of security features can be realized.
The preferred embodiment of this invention will be described in connection with an electrographic printer, by way of example, because this invention is contemplated to be particularly beneficial in such an application. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art having reference to this specification that this invention can also be used in any type of electrographic system, of any size or capacity. As such, this description is provided by way of example only, and is not intended or contemplated to limit the true scope of the invention as claimed.
Referring now to
In a preferred implementation, the non-magnetic toner will have a viscosity of between 1 and 40,000 Poise (40 kP) and an elasticity (tan delta) of between 1 and 20 where elasticity is defined as the ratio of the elastic modulus to the storage modulus of the toner as measured at 120 C on a parallel plate rheometer. In a preferred embodiment, the non-magnetic toner will have a viscosity between 10,000 and 15,000 Poise (P) and a tan delta between 2 and 4.5. In a more preferred embodiment, the non-magnetic toner will have a viscosity between 10,000 P and 12,000 P and a tan delta between 2 and 2.5. The non-magnetic toner may contain optical, UV, or IR sensitive pigments. The non-magnetic toner image elements will preferably be applied to the receiver at an optical transmission density of 0.01 to 5.00. One preferred non-magnetic toner is a NexPress DryInk sold by NexPress Solutions, Inc.
A detailed schematic of one exemplary imaging unit, such as imaging unit 200 shown in
The image elements written by the writer form the latent image which is then toned by the development station 306. The development station 306 contains magnetic or non-magnetic toner for example NexPress Drylnk or similar and a magnetic carrier such as that detailed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,060 A. In the preferred implementation, the magnetic toner will have a viscosity between 1 and 200,000 P and an elasticity of between 0.1 and 20. The magnetic toner may contain between 10 and 30 parts per hundred (pph) magnetic iron oxide such as that sold by Magnox-Pulaski Inc. The magnetic toner may optionally contain optical, UV, or IR pigments and optional abrasion aids. Magnetic toner such as that detailed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,766,136 B2 is preferred. The toner image element is then transferred to the transfer member 308 and then to a receiver 318. Subsequent imaging units, such as 202, 204, 206, and 208 from
Referring now to
Fixing of the combined toner image elements results in an image element with adequate signal strength and improved adhesion to a wide range of substrates. The magnetic waveform signal strengths for Magnetic Ink Character Recognition (MICR) character printed using the preferred embodiments of the proposed invention are 100-120% for “on-us” characters which are the characters usually printed to the left of the routing field on the MICR line often used for commercial checks for the placement of consecutive serial numbers like on a check or like but could be other similar locations relative to a first location. MICR character signal strength was measured using an RDM MICR qualifier produced by RDM Corporation. The qualifier measured the magnetic signal intensity of the MICR characters printed on the receiver. The industry standard requires magnetic signal strength of MICR characters to be between 50% and 200%.
The magnetic and non-magnetic image elements printed and fixed using the proposed invention shows increased resistance to abrasion when passed through an industry standard reader-sorter. Reading and sorting of checks is the primary application of magnetic toner print images. The industry standard equipment is the IBM 3890 high-speed reader-sorter. Magnetic toner print images are routinely subjected to repeated passes through the equipment as the check is routed from its point of use to its bank of origin. A standard test is used to determine the reader/sorter performance of the magnetic toner images printed by the proposed invention. The test involves the following steps:
Table 1 shows the marked improvements of magnetic toner image elements printed using the proposed inventive system over competitive systems.
In addition to improved reader/sorter reject rates, the signal loss due to abrasion of the magnetic toner image elements is also improved. Table 2 shows the percentage of magnetic signal lost by magnetic toner image elements passed through the reader/sorter 20 times. Signal loss is due to removal of the printed material by the read and write heads in the reader/sorter. The magnetic signal strength of toner image elements was measured before and after reader/sorter testing and the % decrease in the magnetic signal is reported.
The combination and order of application of image elements by the imaging units make for an array of security features that can be embedded in the document and/or provide magnetic toner characters with greatly improved adhesion to substrates. Examples of the various schemes are detailed below.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
This application is a divisional of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/437,796, filed May 19, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,101,326 which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4546060 | Miskinis et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4901114 | Parker et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4925215 | Klaiber | May 1990 | A |
5009973 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5021838 | Parker et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5083157 | Smith et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5126221 | Chiba et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5200285 | Carrish | Apr 1993 | A |
5291243 | Heckman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5347302 | Simonoff | Sep 1994 | A |
5368334 | Christy et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5714291 | Marinello et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5783346 | Jadwin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5840457 | Urawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5917996 | Thorpe | Jun 1999 | A |
5965313 | Mizutani et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972553 | Katada et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6025862 | Thompson | Feb 2000 | A |
6086708 | Colgate, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
6167224 | Dalal | Dec 2000 | A |
6610451 | Jadwin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6716560 | Alexandrovich | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6764015 | Pearson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766136 | Jadwin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6909856 | Crichton | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7066668 | Sandison et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7139521 | Ng et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7734199 | Mastie et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8092970 | Tyagi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8101326 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8351825 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020115006 | Jadwin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030148205 | Alexandrovich | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030190541 | Jadwin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040115542 | Nonaka et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040219447 | Jadwin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050135851 | Ng et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142468 | Blood et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142469 | Blood et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050207635 | Lazar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219583 | Foster et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050220518 | Priebe | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050282077 | Riley et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060230273 | Crichton | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090286177 | Tyagi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110081608 | Yaguchi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120202021 | Schulze-Hagenest et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120219309 | Yoshioka | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130051830 | Tamaki et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120163869 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11437796 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 13373488 | US |