This invention relates to the general field of slurry handling and more particularly, to providing non-mechanical agitation to a fluid in a tank.
Some industrial liquids require constant agitation for rheological or processing reasons. Typically, such fluids are dilatant or thixotropic in nature.
Additionally, slurries consisting of small solid particles suspended in a liquid medium typically require some level of agitation in order to keep the solids from settling. Often in industrial processes slurries are stored and mixed in tanks with a mechanical agitator such as a propeller. Circulation pumps then move the slurries from the tanks through distribution piping loops that deliver the slurries to points of use with unused slurry returning to the storage or day tanks.
This invention eliminates the need for mechanical agitators in tanks for many industrial processes. Eliminating the mechanical agitator reduces capital equipment, operation and maintenance costs and the potential for the mechanical agitator to fail and contaminate the fluid. In addition, some fluids are shear sensitive and can be damaged by mechanical agitation.
Rotating mechanical equipment (like mechanical agitators) tend to be rather “dirty” devices producing a continuous shower of wear by-products. This shower of particles poses a threat of contamination particularly in the pharmaceutical and semiconductor industries.
Others have utilized high purity gas bubbling through slurry tanks as a way to eliminate mechanical agitators. Gas bubble agitation has its drawbacks including the cost of a high purity gas, disposal of the spent gas, gas entrainment in the slurry, plugging of the gas spargers/septa, reduced energy efficiency and ineffectiveness at maintaining all but slow settling solids in suspension.
Thus, there still remains a need for a reliable, clean and relatively low shear means to mix industrial fluids in tanks.
This invention provides that a specially shaped tank induces mixing without the need for mechanical agitators. By properly controlling the tank's inlet and outlet structures, gentle-mixing currents develop ensuring adequate agitation to maintain fluids in motion and to maintain slurry suspensions.
The invention consists of a round-bottomed tank having an inlet and an outlet, which together induce deterministic circulation patterns that provide for gentle, effective mixing of the tank contents.
In one preferred embodiment, the invention is a tank comprising a top section, a rounded bottom section, an inlet and an outlet. The top section comprises a front wall, an opposing back wall, and two mutually opposing side walls defining a rectangular cross-section having a width side-to-side and a width front-to-back such that the front-to-back width is less than the side-to-side width. The rounded bottom section comprising a lowest point has at least one curved wall extending from the lowest point to at least one side wall of the top section. The inlet is located on the rounded bottom of the tank at the lowest point of the rounded-bottom section. Extending from the inlet to the inside of the tank is a rigid pipe that contains at least two holes that direct fluid toward the front-to-back width walls. The outlet is located inside the tank above and in close proximity to the inlet.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the following accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only. Throughout the following views, reference numerals will be used in the drawings, and the same reference numerals will be used throughout the several views and in the description to indicate same or like parts.
In the following detailed description, references made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Bottom section 15 has a rounded front profile 21 thereby defining a curved side wall. Any rounded profile 21 having a single lowest point 23 and forming at least one concave curved side wall 25 extending from lowest point 23 to a transition point 24 where the top and bottom sections are attached to each other may be used for the inventive tank. In a preferred embodiment, this rounded profile 21 is designed to approximate the geometry of two, side-by-side circulation cells, also known as eddies. In such an embodiment, the rounded profile 21 should be designed so that the ratio of the width 26 of the rounded-bottom to the depth 28 of the rounded-bottom is approximately two to one (2:1). Attached to the front profile 21 at the lowest point 23 is an inlet 27. In a preferred embodiment, inlet 27 comprises a pipe or other like device extending across the tank from a bulkhead on either the front or back wall.
As shown in
Outlet 29 is located on tank 11 above inlet 27. Outlet 29 comprises a pipe or other like device. In a preferred embodiment, outlet 29 extends across the tank from a bulkhead on either the front or back wall. Outlet 29 has at least one hole or slit 52 Typically, outlet 29 has a single line of holes or slits 52 on the pipe, or like device, facing vertically upward. The number and size of these holes or slits 52 are designed to maximize the circulation pattern in the tank.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, inlet 27 is located at the lowest point 23 of bottom section 15 to generate the circulation cells with the highest velocity. As the height of the tank increases by a factor of depth D of the rounded bottom shown in
Referring to
However, in the inventive self-mixing tank, all circulation cells on the same side of the tank 34A, 35A, 36A and 34B, 35B, 36B have been observed to unexpectedly rotate in the same direction as shown by the direction of the arrows depicted in
A primary route for fluid 103 is to pass through recirculation system 161 to piping system 163 and then to inlet 27 of tank 11. Flow from piping system 163 may also flow through valve 173 to drain 175 or to distribution loop 177.
The inventive tank may be used with most industrial liquids requiring efficient mixing or needing constant circulation. As explained above, the diameter of the openings can be adjusted based upon the liquid properties. For viscous or shear sensitive liquids, the diameter would be relatively large. For fast-settling liquids that are not shear sensitive, the diameter of the openings should be relatively small to increase the velocity of the liquid in the jets. As such, the inventive tank is well adapted to use in a slurry handling system. The inventive tank is capable of handling slurries that have settling times in the range of minutes to hours. The inventive tank may not be able to maintain suspension of slurries that settle out in seconds, e.g., coarse sand and water.
Although the inventive tank is suitable for most applications and industries, certain high viscosity, sensitive fluids may not be suitable for use with this tank. For example, high viscosity fluids require increasing the energy imparted by the nozzle jets produced by the inlet in order to form the circulation cell. However, such high energy or shear may damage the fluid.
The turnover rate through the tank depends on the fluid or slurry characteristics. Turn-over rates of 5–10 liters per minute in a 110 liter tank are generally satisfactory. This provides for a turn over time between about 6 to about 20 minutes. Of course, higher or lower turn over times may be used where appropriate for the fluid.
The following examples illustrate the ability of the tank to achieve mixing and maintain particles in suspension. The prototype tank was designed with width 2D and height 3D as shown in
Deionized Water and Dye Experiment
In Example 1, deionized (DI) water was circulated through the tank. Green dye was injected into the DI water stream entering the tank in order to determine the general flow patterns. Visual observations indicated that jets were produced in the tank and mixing was achieved quickly. The general flow patterns of the jets were similar to
At a height of 1D with an average flow rate of 1.4 gpm (5.3 lpm) the time required for 1 turnover was calculated to be 6.98 minutes. The time required for dye to reach the surface of the liquid was 12 seconds and to homogenize was 1 minute and 10 seconds. Therefore, the color homogenized before 1 turnover. The mixing time when graphed as a function of flow rate resulted in an inverse first order relationship (refer to
With the tank filled to a height of 3D and operating at a maximum flow rate of 3.8 gpm (14.364 lpm), only 18 seconds was required for the dye to reach the surface of the liquid. Table 1 shows the data collected during the DI and Dye Experiment in Example 1.
Addition of Saline Solution to D1 Water
The results of the dye test were confirmed by injecting saline solution and dye into the DI water flow. These samples were measured for conductivity. The tank was filled to level 4 which was 99.27 liters and the content was recirculated at an average flow rate of 0.9 gpm. Saline solution with a conductivity of 144.6 mS and concentrated dye were added to the flow entering the tank. Conductivity measurements were performed on samples obtained at 4 points in the tank over time. These four points are: level 1, the inlet; level 2, height of 1D; level 3, height of 2D; and level 4, top of the fluid at a height of 3D. The results of the conductivity measurements are listed in Table 2 and represented in graphical format in
Process Conditions for Example 2
Example 2 was repeated at a higher flow rate so that mixing could be observed up to level 4. An average flow rate of 1.6 gpm was used to recirculate the tank contents. Again saline solution with concentrated dye was injected into the flow entering the tank. Samples were obtained from 4 levels in the tank and evaluated for conductivity as described in Example 2. The results are tabulated in Table 3 and represented in
Slurry Blend Test
The tank was tested with a fast settling ceria slurry and samples were analyzed for percent solids. HS-DLS available from Hitachi was used for this experiment. HS-DLS is known to settle very fast. Nine (9) liters of slurry was added to the empty tank followed by 91 liters of DI water. During addition of the water the content of the tank was recirculated at an average flow rate of 1.7 gpm. Samples were taken during the addition of DI water. After reaching level 4 or 99.27 liters of diluted slurry in the tank, the DI water valve was closed and the system continued to recycle at a flow rate of 1.7 gpm. After 3 hours the recirculation flow rate was decreased to an average flow rate of 1.47 gpm and after another 3 hours its was decreased to 0.9 gpm. During the experiment, samples were obtained from 4 levels in the tank as described in Example 2. Percent solids analysis was performed on the samples. The results are tabulated in Table 4 and represented in
Once the ceria particles were suspended at a high flow rate the ceria particles remained in suspension even at lower flow rates. Once the flow patterns similar to
Slurry Resuspension Test
If there is a shut down in a semiconductor fabrication plant the slurry in the day tank would settle over time. To simulate such an event, the slurry from Example 3 was left to settle in the tank for more than 24 hours. To resuspend the slurry blend a recirculation flow rate of 0.9 gpm was used.
Samples were taken as soon as the pump started and then periodically during the experiment. The samples were analyzed for percent solids and the results are provided in Table 5 and
The above examples show that the inventive self-mixing tank can achieve mixing and maintain particle suspension without the use of mechanical mixers. The shape of the tank and the inlet nozzle is able to achieve mixing in a short period. As shown above, mixing was achieved at all levels in the tank in less than a minute when the recirculation rate was 0.9 gpm and density differences between the fluids were insignificant. When density differences impacted mixing, higher flow rates could be used to homogenize the fluids in the tank.
While the foregoing description and drawings represent the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2603460 | Kalinske | Jul 1952 | A |
2906607 | Jamison | Sep 1959 | A |
3647357 | Niedner et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
RE27681 | Gaddis | Jun 1973 | E |
3762689 | Hege | Oct 1973 | A |
4534655 | King et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4812045 | Rivers | Mar 1989 | A |
5332312 | Evanson | Jul 1994 | A |
5564825 | Burt | Oct 1996 | A |
5769536 | Kotylak | Jun 1998 | A |
6065860 | Fuchsbichler | May 2000 | A |
6186657 | Fuchsbichler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2151205 | Apr 1973 | DE |
20000841 | May 2000 | DE |
9-33000 | Feb 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040156262 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |