The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to semiconductor devices with enhanced semiconductor materials and associated methods.
Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an re-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.
An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,895 to Wang et al. discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.
Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.
Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,337 to Wang et al. discloses a method for producing an insulating or barrier layer for semiconductor devices which includes depositing a layer of silicon and at least one additional element on the silicon substrate whereby the deposited layer is substantially free of defects such that epitaxial silicon substantially free of defects can be deposited on the deposited layer. Alternatively, a monolayer of one or more elements, preferably comprising oxygen, is absorbed on a silicon substrate. A plurality of insulating layers sandwiched between epitaxial silicon forms a barrier composite.
Despite the existence of such approaches, further enhancements may be desirable for using advanced semiconductor materials and processing techniques to achieve improved performance in semiconductor devices.
A semiconductor device may include a first single crystal silicon layer having a first percentage of silicon 28; a second single crystal silicon layer having a second percentage of silicon 28 higher than the first percentage of silicon 28; and a superlattice between the first and second single crystal silicon layers. The superlattice may include stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers including stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions. The at least one non-semiconductor monolayer may include oxygen, for example.
The first percentage of silicon 28 may be less than 93 percent. In addition, the second percentage of silicon 28 may be greater than 95 percent, and, more preferably greater than 99 percent.
In an example embodiment, the semiconductor device may further include a third single crystal semiconductor layer between the first single crystal semiconductor layer and the superlattice and having a third percentage of silicon 28 higher than the first percentage of silicon 28. In accordance with another example implementation, the semiconductor device may further include a third single crystal semiconductor layer between the superlattice and the second single crystal semiconductor layer. In still another example embodiment, the superlattice layer may comprise a first superlattice layer above the first single crystal semiconductor layer, and the semiconductor device may further include a third single crystal semiconductor layer above the first superlattice, and a second superlattice above the third single crystal semiconductor layer and below the second single crystal semiconductor layer. Furthermore, in some embodiments the superlattice layer may be on the first single crystal silicon layer, and the second single crystal silicon layer may be on the superlattice layer, for example.
The first single crystal silicon layer may have a first thickness, and the second single crystal silicon layer may have a second thickness less than the first thickness. In other words, the first single crystal silicon layer may serve as the substrate and the second layer may serve as an epitaxial layer.
The semiconductor device may further include at least one circuit device associated with the second single crystal silicon layer. For example, the at least one circuit device may comprise a plurality of quantum bit devices. In other embodiments, the at least one circuit device may comprise spaced apart source and drain regions in the second single crystal silicon layer defining a channel therebetween, and a gate comprising a gate dielectric layer overlying the channel and a gate electrode overlying the gate dielectric layer.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the example embodiments are shown. The embodiments may, however, be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the specific examples set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.
Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to the formation of semiconductor devices utilizing an enhanced semiconductor superlattice. The enhanced semiconductor superlattice is also referred to as an “MST” layer/film or “MST technology” in this disclosure.
More particularly, the MST technology relates to advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below. Applicant theorizes, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicant's use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mh−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:
for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.
Applicant's definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again, Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.
Applicant has identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, Applicant has identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.
Referring now to
Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in
The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in
In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.
Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.
The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.
Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example
It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of
In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed, it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.
Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is theorized without Applicant wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in
While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons and holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Indeed, referring now additionally to
In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.
In
It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.
Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicant to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.
An example approach for fabricating a semiconductor device 150 using the above-described superlattice structures to provide an enriched 28Si active device layer is first described with reference to
On the other hand, there is a substantial cost related to the purification of 28Si, and thus production of 28Si in large quantities (e.g., as a substrate) can be cost prohibitive. As a result, some attempts have been made to form 28Si layers on top of a natural silicon substrate (i.e., having 92.23% or less 28Si). However, due to silicon interdiffusion, a relatively thick 28Si epitaxial layer still needs to be grown on the substrate. In still another approach, to prevent silicon intermixing, designs utilizing a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) approach have also been proposed. While this allows for a relatively thin 28Si layer, the SOI technology used for this implementation is costly as well.
In the illustrated example, beginning at Block 81, a first single crystal silicon layer 151 (e.g., a substrate) is provided having a first percentage of 28Si, at Block 82. Furthermore, a superlattice 125 is grown on the first single crystal layer 151 (Block 83), such as the Si/O superlattice structures described further above. Additionally, a second single crystal silicon layer 152 (e.g., an active device layer) is epitaxially grown on the superlattice 125, at Block 84. More particularly, the second percentage of 28Si is higher than the first percentage of 28Si, defining an isotropically enriched, high concentration 28Si layer. The method of
The first silicon layer 151 has a first thickness, and the second silicon layer 152 has a second thickness less than the first thickness. In other words, the first silicon layer 151 may serve as the substrate for the semiconductor device 150, while the second silicon layer 152 may serve as an epitaxial active layer in which additional circuitry may be formed to take advantage of the enhanced 28Si properties, yet at relatively low fabrication costs. In the illustrated configuration, the superlattice 125 advantageously acts as a physical barrier to help prevent intermixing of the first layer 151 with 28Si<93% and the second layer 152 with 28Si>95%.
Referring additionally to
Turning to
Turning now to
The silicon monolayers 46 of the superlattice 225 may also be formed with enriched 28Si. In this regard, it should be noted that in some embodiments, the third layer 253 may be absent, but the transition to the enriched 28Si may take place in the silicon monolayers 46 of the superlattice 225. That is, some or all of the monolayers 46 of the superlattice 225 may be formed with enriched 28Si, with or without the third layer 225.
Turning now to
In this configuration, rather than providing a physical barrier to intermixing of silicon from the first and second layers 351, 352 as with the device 250, here the interstitial trapping properties of the superlattice 325 help prevent intermixing by eliminating silicon interstitials from the system. Interstitials contribute to silicon self-diffusion, which leads to in silicon intermixing. To target this, the depth of the superlattice 325 may be set by the thickness of the third layer 353 to the desired distance under the transition region or interface 354. Further details regarding use of superlattices to help reduce silicon interstitials are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 10,580,866 to Takeuchi et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 9,941,359 to Mears et al., which are both hereby incorporated herein in their entireties by reference. The third layer 353 may have the same or similar 28Si concentration to that of the first layer 351, for example, making the superlattice 325 a “buried” layer with respect to the transition region 354. However, in some embodiments the third layer 353 may also have an enhanced 28Si concentration as discussed above with reference to
Referring additionally to
The foregoing embodiments provide a relatively low cost approach for growing purified 28Si layers on a silicon substrate using the above-described superlattice structures. In addition to the above-noted advantages of 28Si, the above-described configurations provide additional advantages as a result of the incorporated superlattice(s). More particularly, in addition to the relatively low cost fabrication as a result of the superlattice(s), the superlattice(s) advantageously help prevent silicon intermixing, allowing for a relatively thin 28Si epitaxial (active) layer. Additionally, as noted above, the superlattice(s) can help reduce silicon interstitials from the 28Si epitaxial layer, as discussed further in the aforementioned '866 and '359 patents. This helps to even further decrease interdiffusion. Additionally, elimination of interstitial point defects increases the effective silicon purity, allowing for even higher quantum decoherence times for quantum device applications.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4937204 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5216262 | Tsu | Jun 1993 | A |
5357119 | Wang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5796119 | Seabaugh | Aug 1998 | A |
6141361 | Mears et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6376337 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6472685 | Takagi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6741624 | Mears et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6830964 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833294 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878576 | Mears et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891188 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897472 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927413 | Mears et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952018 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958486 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6993222 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018900 | Kreps | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033437 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034329 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045377 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045813 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071119 | Mears et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105895 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109052 | Mears et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123792 | Mears et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7148712 | Prey, Jr. et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153763 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202494 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227174 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229902 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265002 | Mears et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279699 | Mears et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279701 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288457 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303948 | Mears et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7432524 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435988 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436026 | Kreps | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446002 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7446334 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491587 | Rao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514328 | Rao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517702 | Halilov et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531828 | Mears et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531829 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7531850 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7586116 | Kreps et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586165 | Blanchard | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598515 | Mears et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612366 | Mears et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625767 | Huang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659539 | Kreps et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700447 | Dukovski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718996 | Dukovski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7781827 | Rao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812339 | Mears et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7863066 | Mears et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880161 | Mears et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928425 | Rao | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8389974 | Mears et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
9275996 | Mears et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9406753 | Mears et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9558939 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9886668 | Dzurak et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9899479 | Mears et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9941359 | Mears et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9972685 | Mears et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10084045 | Mears et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10107854 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109342 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109479 | Mears et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10170560 | Mears | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170603 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170604 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10191105 | Roy | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10249745 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276625 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10304881 | Chen et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10355151 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10361243 | Mears et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367028 | Chen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367064 | Rao | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381242 | Takeuchi | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396223 | Chen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10410880 | Takeuchi | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10453945 | Mears et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10461118 | Chen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10468245 | Weeks et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10529757 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10529768 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10566191 | Weeks et al. | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10580866 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10580867 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10593761 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10608027 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10608043 | Chen et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10615209 | Chen et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10636879 | Rao | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10727049 | Weeks et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10741436 | Stephenson et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10763370 | Stephenson | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10777451 | Stephenson et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10811498 | Weeks et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10818755 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10825901 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10825902 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10840335 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840336 | Connelly et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840337 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840388 | Burton et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10847618 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854717 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10868120 | Burton et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
20030034529 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040169225 | Burden | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050282330 | Mears et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060220118 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267130 | Rao | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070012910 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020833 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070267572 | Itoh et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080012004 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080258134 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110215299 | Rao | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20150357414 | Mears | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160149023 | Mears et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160358773 | Mears et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170179316 | Balakrishnan et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180122925 | Balakrishnan et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190043968 | Lampert | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190058059 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190189652 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190279897 | Stephenson et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190317277 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319135 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319167 | Stephenson | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200075731 | Weeks | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200135489 | Weeks et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200343367 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200343380 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0838093 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2347520 | Jun 2000 | GB |
2000260974 X | Sep 2000 | JP |
2015077580 | May 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,825, filed 17/17/2019; Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,832, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,875, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,906, filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/801,287, filed Feb. 26, 2020 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/801,305, filed Feb. 26, 2020 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/810,957, filed Mar. 6, 2020 Cody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/898,564, filed Jun. 11, 2020 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/898,589, filed Jun. 11, 2020 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,487, filed Jun. 26, 2020 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/913,546, filed Jun. 26, 2020 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/020,353, filed Sep. 14, 2020; Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/101,399, filed Nov. 23, 2020 Stephenson et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/236,289, filed Apr. 21, 2021 Hytha et al. |
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7; Aug. 12, 2002; 4 pgs. |
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11, 2012) pp. 2. |
Novikov et al. “Silicon-based Optoelectronics” 1999-2003, pp. 1-6. |
R. Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure device” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402. |
R. Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” wysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only. |
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2. mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016. |
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pp. 3345-3349. |
Connelly et al. “Suppressing Oxidation-Enhanced Diffusion of Boron via Buried Epitaxial Oxygen-Inserted Layers in Silicon” 2018 IEEE 2nd Electron Devices Technology and Manufacturing Conference (EDTM), Kobe, 2018, pp. 163-165. Abstract Only. |
Mazzocchi et al. “99.992% 28Si CVD-grown epilayer on 300 mm substrates for large scale integration of silicon spin qubits” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 509, 2019, pp. 7. |
Kizilyali et al. “Power Transistors Fabricated using Isotopically Purified Silicon” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 404-406, (Jun. 2005). Abstract Only. |
S.J. Burden “High Thermal Conductivity Silicon” Semiconductor Fabtech Magazine, Thirteenth Edition, (2002); pp. 297-302. |
Cahill et al. “Thermal conductivity of isotopically pure and Ge-doped Si epitaxial layers from 300 to 550 K” Physical Review B, 70, 235322 (2004); pp. 3. |
Capinski et al. “Thermal Conductivity of Isotopically Enriched Silicon” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 71, No. 15, (1997) Abstract Only. |
Ruf et al. “Thermal Conductivity of Isotopically Enriched Silicon” Solid State Communications, vol. 115, No. 5, Jun. 19, 2000; Abstract Only. |
Kamarov et al. “Transient Thermo-Reflectance Measurements of the Thermal Conductivity and Interface Resistance of Metallized Natural and Isotopically Pure Silicon” Microelectronic Journal, vol. 34, No. 12; Dec. 2003; Abstract Only. |
Ruf et al. Erratum to “Thermal conductivity of isotopically enriched silicon” Solid State Communications, vol. 127, p. 257, (2003); No Abstract Available. |
Leon et al. “Coherent spin control of s-, p-, d- and f-electrons in a silicon quantum dot” Nature Communications (2020) 11:797 www.nature.com/naturecommunications: pp. 6. |
Veldhorst et al. “Silicon CMOS architecture for a spin-based quantum computer” Nature Communications; 8:0766: www.nature.com/naturecommunications; pp. 8. |
Maurand et al. “A CMOS silicon spin qubit” Nature Communications May 2016 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303488864; pp. 12. |
Ladd et al. “Silicon Qubits” https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09736-8; Feb. 28, 2018; Abstract Only. |
Sandia National Laboratories “Silicon-Based Quantum Information Sciences Grand Challenge” https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1706399-silicon-based-quantum-information-sciences-grand-challenge: Aug. 1, 2008; pp. 2. |
Jan Ove Odden “Monoisotopic Silicon-28 (28Si)” isosilicon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/JO-Odden-Si-28.pdf 2006; pp. 10. |
Karaiskaj et al. “Photoluminescence of Isotopically Purified Silicon: How Sharp are Bound Exciton Transitions?” Physical Review Letters; vol. 86; No. 26; Jun. 25, 2001; pp. 4. |
Tang et al. “Targeted enrichment of 28Si thin films for quantum computing” J. Phys. Commun. 4 (2020) 035006: https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/ab7b33: pp. 7. |
Odden et al. “Separation of Isotopes” ISOSILICON http://isosilicon.com/en/our-technology/ 2006; pp. 18. |
Andrew Dzurak “Silicon-based Quantum Computing: The path from laboratory to industrial manufacture” Letil innovation Days, Grenoble, France, Jul. 4, 2018; pp. 44. |
Erikson et al. “New separation methods for production of light stable isotopes for use in nuclear technology” 3rd INCC, Sicily—Italy; Sep. 18-23, 2011; pp. 24. |
Wolfowicz et al. “Decoherence mechanisms of 209Bi donor electron spins in isotopically pure 28Si” Physical review. B, Condensed matter; Jul. 2012; pp. 5. |
Anonymous“Silicon-28Next Generation Material for Semiconductors” http://isosilicon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Isosilicon2016-2007-rev-2016-acknowl.pdf retreived from internet Jun. 11, 2021; pp. 14. |
Zhao et al. “Single-spin qubits in isotopically enriched silicon at low magnetic field” Nature Communications: vol. 10, Article No. 5500 (2019); pp. 10. |
Divincenzo et al. “Quantum Information is Physical” Superlattices and Microstructures 23, 419 (1998); http://isosilicon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Isosilicon2016-2007-rev-2016-acknowl.pdf: pp. 11. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220352322 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |