The present disclosure generally relates to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to semiconductor devices including hyper-abrupt junctions and related methods.
Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an re-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.
An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electroluminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,895 to Wang et al. discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.
Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc., can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.
Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,337 to Wang et al. discloses a method for producing an insulating or barrier layer for semiconductor devices which includes depositing a layer of silicon and at least one additional element on the silicon substrate whereby the deposited layer is substantially free of defects such that epitaxial silicon substantially free of defects can be deposited on the deposited layer. Alternatively, a monolayer of one or more elements, preferably comprising oxygen, is absorbed on a silicon substrate. A plurality of insulating layers sandwiched between epitaxial silicon forms a barrier composite.
Despite the existence of such approaches, further enhancements may be desirable for using advanced semiconductor materials and processing techniques to achieve improved performance in semiconductor devices.
A semiconductor device may include a substrate and a hyper-abrupt junction region carried by the substrate. The hyper-abrupt junction region may include a first semiconductor layer having a first conductivity type, a superlattice layer on the first semiconductor layer, and a second semiconductor layer on the superlattice layer and having a second conductivity type different than the first conductivity type. The superlattice may include a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion, and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. The first, second, and the superlattice layers may be U-shaped. The semiconductor device may further include a gate dielectric layer on the second semiconductor layer of the hyper-abrupt junction region, a gate electrode on the gate dielectric layer, and spaced apart source and drain regions adjacent the hyper-abrupt junction region.
In accordance with example implementations, the hyper-abrupt junction region may further include an intrinsic semiconductor layer above or below the superlattice layer. The spaced apart source and drain regions may have the second conductivity type. By way of example, the first and second semiconductor layers may each have a thickness in a range of 50 nm to 300 nm. Also by way of example, the base semiconductor monolayers may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, and the at least one non-semiconductor monolayer may comprise at least one of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the example embodiments are shown. The embodiments may, however, be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the specific examples set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime and multiple prime notation are used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.
Generally speaking, the present disclosure relates to devices having an enhanced semiconductor superlattice therein. The enhanced semiconductor superlattice is also referred to as an “MST” layer or “MST technology” in this disclosure and the accompanying drawings.
More particularly, the MST technology relates to advanced semiconductor materials such as the superlattice 25 described further below. Applicant theorizes, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicants use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mk−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:
for electrons and:
for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.
Applicant's definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.
Applicant has identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, Applicant has identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.
Referring now to
Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in
The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in
In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Applicant theorizes without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.
Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.
The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.
Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.
It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of
In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.
Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
It is theorized without Applicant wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in
While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons and holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Indeed, referring now additionally to
In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.
In
It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.
Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicant to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.
Referring now to
In the example embodiments presented herein, one or more diffusion blocking superlattice layers, such as the MST superlattice layers discussed above, are advantageously incorporated into a hyper-abrupt junction stack. The superlattice layers advantageously block inter-diffusion, and accordingly increase the available charge with higher mobility due to less ionized impurity scattering. In accordance with a first example, a JFET 100 illustratively includes a semiconductor substrate 101 with a back gate 102 therein. Spaced-apart source and drain regions 104, 105 with respective contacts 106, 107 are formed on the back gate 102, and a hyper-abrupt junction region 108 is also formed on the back gate between the source and drain regions. Furthermore, back gate reach through regions 109 with contacts 110 are coupled to the back gate 102, and isolation regions 111 (e.g., an oxide) separate the back gate reach through regions from the source drain regions 104, 105. It should be noted that, in some embodiments, the back gate reach through regions 109 could instead extend from a back side of the substrate 101 rather than from the top/front side as shown, in which case the contact(s) 110 would be on the back side of the substrate.
More particularly, the hyper-abrupt junction region 108 illustratively includes a first semiconductor layer 112 having a first conductivity type (N or P), a first superlattice layer 125a on the first semiconductor layer, a second semiconductor layer 113 on the first superlattice layer and having a second conductivity type different than the first conductivity type (P or N), and a second superlattice layer 125b on the second semiconductor layer. Furthermore, a gate overlies the second superlattice layer 125b and illustratively includes a gate electrode 115, which will typically be the same conductivity type as the back gate 102 and the first semiconductor layer 112 (i.e., the first conductivity type), while the semiconductor layer 113 and source/drain regions 104, 105 will be the same conductivity type (here the second conductivity type). The second semiconductor layer 113 of the hyper-abrupt junction region 108 defines a hyper-abrupt channel of the JFET 100. The superlattice layers 125a, 125b effectively block inter-diffusion and thus increase the available charge with higher mobility within the channel due to less ionized impurity scattering.
Referring additionally to the flow diagram 120 of
Turning to
Overlying the hyper-abrupt junction region 208 are drain extension regions 230 and a dielectric layer 228. Furthermore, a gate electrode layer 215 overlies the dielectric layer 228 and is surrounded by a gate dielectric layer 214. A body region 233 surrounds the gate dielectric layer and defines a conduction channel 240 adjacent the gate dielectric layer 232. Overlying the body region 233 is a source region 234, and overlying the source region and gate are first and second dielectric layers 235, 236. Furthermore, a source contact layer 237 (e.g., semiconductor) may be formed over the top side of the device 200 (i.e., overlying the gate structure and semiconductor layer 202), and a drain contact layer 238 (e.g., a metal layer) may be formed on the back side of the substrate 201.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Furthermore, an anode region 340 and associated metal layer 341 (i.e., a first contact) are formed on the hyper-abrupt junction region 308, at Block 133. Furthermore, a reach through implant 342 and associated metal layer 343 (i.e., a second contact) are also formed (Block 134) to contact the cathode layer 302 of the substrate 301 (it should be noted that this may instead be formed as a backside contact if desired in some embodiments). The reach through implant 342 is laterally spaced apart from the hyper-abrupt junction 308 and extends from a surface of the collector layer 303 to the cathode layer 302. More particularly, the reach through implant 342 may have an opposite conductivity type than the cathode layer 302 and collector layer 303, and the collector layer and first semiconductor layer 312 may have the same conductivity type. Furthermore, isolation regions 311 (e.g., a dielectric) may be formed around the hyper-abrupt junction region 308 and the reach through implant 342. The method of
Another similar varactor 330′ is now described with reference to
Further details regarding JFET, IGFET, and varactor structures may respectively be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,825,441 to Eshun et al.; U.S. Pub. No. 2007/0278565 to Tu et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,183,628 to Coolbaugh et al., which are hereby incorporated herein in their entireties by reference.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4937204 | Ishibashi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5216262 | Tsu | Jun 1993 | A |
5357119 | Wang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5796119 | Seabaugh | Aug 1998 | A |
6141361 | Mears et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6376337 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6472685 | Takagi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6741624 | Mears et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6830964 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6833294 | Mears et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878576 | Mears et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6891188 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6897472 | Mears et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927413 | Mears et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952018 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958486 | Mears et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6993222 | Mears et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7018900 | Kreps | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7033437 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034329 | Mears et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7045377 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7045813 | Mears et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7071119 | Mears et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105895 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109052 | Mears et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7123792 | Mears et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7148712 | Prey, Jr. et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7153763 | Hytha et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7183628 | Coolbaugh | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202494 | Blanchard et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227174 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229902 | Mears et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265002 | Mears et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279699 | Mears et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279701 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288457 | Kreps | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303948 | Mears et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7432524 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435988 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436026 | Kreps | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446002 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7446334 | Mears et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7491587 | Rao | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514328 | Rao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7517702 | Halilov et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531828 | Mears et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531829 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7531850 | Blanchard | May 2009 | B2 |
7586116 | Kreps et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7586165 | Blanchard | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598515 | Mears et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612366 | Mears et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625767 | Huang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659539 | Kreps et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700447 | Dukovski et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718996 | Dukovski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7781827 | Rao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812339 | Mears et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7825441 | Eshun | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7863066 | Mears et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880161 | Mears et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928425 | Rao | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8168500 | Campi | May 2012 | B2 |
8389974 | Mears et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
9275996 | Mears et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9406753 | Mears | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9558939 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9899479 | Mears et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9941359 | Mears et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10084045 | Mears et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10107854 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109342 | Roy | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10109479 | Mears et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10170560 | Mears | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170603 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10170604 | Mears et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10191105 | Roy | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10249745 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276625 | Mears et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10304881 | Chen et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10580866 | Takeuchi | Mar 2020 | B1 |
20030034529 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20060220118 | Stephenson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060267130 | Rao | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070012910 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020833 | Mears et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070278565 | Tu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080012004 | Huang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080258134 | Mears et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080315266 | Eshun et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090250739 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100059859 | Trivedi | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110215299 | Rao | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20150357414 | Mears | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160099317 | Mears et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160149023 | Mears et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160358773 | Mears et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180040724 | Mears et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180337063 | Takeuchi | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180337064 | Takeuchi | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180358361 | Rao | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180358442 | Rao | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190057896 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190058059 | Stephenson et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190189652 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189655 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189657 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189658 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189665 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189669 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189670 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189676 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189677 | Mears et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189817 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190189818 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2347520 | Jun 2000 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Skyworks Datasheet “SMV2025 Series: Surface Mount, Silicon Hyperabrupt Tuning Varactor Diodes” Aug. 7, 2015; http://www.skyworksinc.com/uploads/documents/SMV2025_Series_201431E.pdf pp. 7. |
Microsemi “SOT23 Hyperabrupt Series” https://www.microsemi.com/product-directory/varactors-surface-mount/3202-sot23-hyperabrupt-series; Retrieved from Internet Dec. 19, 2018, pp. 2. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/916,766; filed Mar. 9, 2018 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/916,831; filed Mar. 9, 2018 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/117,178; filed Aug. 30, 2018 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/117,202; filed Aug. 30, 2018 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/176,005; filed Oct. 31, 2018 Weeks et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,897; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Connelly et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,911; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,923; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,930; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,941; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,959; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/192,987; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/193,000; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/193,011; filed Nov. 16, 2018 Takeuchi et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/296,400; filed Mar. 8, 2019 Stephenson et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/296,414; filed Mar. 8, 2019 Stephenson et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,091; filed Apr. 10, 2019 Robert Stephenson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,111; filed Apr. 10, 2019 Robert Stephenson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,142; filed Apr. 10, 2019 Robert Stephenson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/380,149; filed Apr. 10, 2019 Robert Stephenson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,528 ; filed 17/17/2019; Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,832; filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,845 ; filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,875; filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
Xu et al “Electron mobility enhancement in (100) oxygen-inserted silicon channel” Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 123502 (2015); Abstract Only. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,906; filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,932; filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,943; filed 17/17/2019 Burton et al. |
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7; Aug. 12, 2002; 4 pgs. |
Mears et al. “Simultaneous Carrier Transport Enhancement and variability reduction in Si MOSFETs by insertion of partial Monolayers of oxygen” IEEE silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop (2012): (Date of conference Jun. 10-11, 2012) pp. 2. |
Novikov et al. “Silicon-based Optoelectronics” 1999-2003, pp. 1-6. |
R. TSU Phenomena in silicon nanostructure device published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402. |
R. Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” wysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only. |
Xu et al. “Effectiveness of Quasi-confinement technology for improving P-chanel Si an Ge MOSSFET performance” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 2, mearstech.net; retrieved from internet Jan. 18, 2016. |
Xu et al. “Extension of planar bulk n-channel MOSFET scaling with oxygen insertion technology” IEEE Transactions on Electron devices, vol. 61, No. 9; Sep. 2014. pp. 3345-3349. |
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4. |