Patent Grant
7828983
The present invention relates to processes for texturing the surface of a semiconductor, and to semiconductor materials having a textured surface so as to decrease their reflectivity and/or increase the capability of the semiconductor to trap light.
In order to maximize the efficiency of silicon solar cells, detectors or photodiodes, it is important to maximize the amount of light with a wavelength less than 1100 nm absorbed in the silicon. There are two mechanisms which can reduce the amount of light absorbed. Light may be reflected off the silicon surface, or it may enter the silicon and exit the silicon again some time later without having been absorbed. Both these loss mechanisms can be reduced by roughening, or texturing, the silicon surface. This reduces reflection losses by increasing the probability that a light ray will strike the silicon surface multiple times, and it reduces absorption losses by confining the light within the silicon (called light trapping).
A texturing technique which can be used for single crystal silicon of (100) orientation is to etch the silicon in a solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA). This results in a surface covered in square base pyramids. However, this approach cannot be used for the case where the silicon surface is not (100) crystallographic orientation. Several other texturing techniques are currently under development which do not rely on a particular crystallographic orientation, such as the use of reactive ion etching (RIE). However, these techniques may prove to be expensive or to lead to other disadvantages, such as increased carrier recombination at the silicon surface. Further, these techniques are only suitable for the texturing of flat wafers and cannot be applied, for example, to the texturing of unexposed surfaces of silicon strips which are held in a wafer frame, such as strips produced as disclosed in International Patent Application no. WO 02/45143, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved process for decreasing the reflectivity of a surface of a semiconductor.
It is an object of the present invention to provide such a process.
In accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a process for texturing a surface of a semiconductor material, the process comprising:
The step of applying the layer of protective substance may be a single step, or it may involve first creating a layer of protective substance that has relatively few or no apertures in it, and then partially thinning the layer of protective substance over its entire surface until it is sufficiently thin that a plurality of apertures are formed in it. The layer of protective substance, as first created, is not perfectly smooth and is therefore thinner in some places than in others. As a result, when the surface of the layer is contacted by an etchant that etches the protective substance, or is otherwise thinned, some parts of the layer will be thinned through more quickly than other parts, giving rise to a plurality of apertures in the layer.
Accordingly, in a second embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a process for texturing a surface of a semiconductor material, the process comprising:
According to a third embodiment of the present invention there is provided a semiconductor material, at least part of at least one surface of which has a plurality of pits therein wherein said pits are substantially randomly arranged over said part of said at least one surface, and have an interior surface which is at least partially rounded.
According to a fourth embodiment of the present invention there is provided a semiconductor material, at least part of at least one surface of which has a plurality of pits therein wherein said pits are substantially randomly arranged over said part of said at least one surface, and have a width of up to 10 μm.
According to a fifth embodiment, the invention provides a semiconductor, at least part of a surface of which has been textured by a process of the first or second embodiment.
According to a sixth embodiment, the invention provides a semiconductor having a surface, at least part of which has been textured by etching said surface through a plurality of apertures in a layer of protective substance on said surface, said layer of protective substance having said apertures by virtue of the thinness of said layer.
The invention further provides a semiconductor material having a layer of protective substance applied to at least part of at least one surface thereof, wherein said layer of protective substance has a plurality of apertures therethrough by virtue of the thinness of said layer.
Semiconductor materials that have been textured by the process of the present invention are useful in the manufacture of solar cells. Accordingly, in a seventh embodiment the invention provides a solar cell comprising the semiconductor material of any of the third to sixth embodiments.
In the processes of the present invention, by “substantially unetched” is meant that the etching is carried out under conditions in which the semiconductor material is etched in the vicinity of apertures in the protective substance, but sufficient of the protective substance remains on the surface of the semiconductor material at the end of the etching to prevent the semiconductor material from being etched in regions other than in the vicinity of the apertures.
By “substantially uniformly” is meant that the thinning is carried out under conditions in which the protective layer is thinned at substantially the same rate over its entire surface so that, in a given time, substantially the same thickness of protective substance is removed at all points over the surface.
In the processes of the invention, the protective substance is any substance that is resistant to etching by at least one etchant capable of etching the semiconductor material, or at least is etched by at least one etchant sufficiently more slowly than the semiconductor material is etched by that etchant so as to be substantially unetched under conditions employed in the processes of the invention.
In the process of the first embodiment, the layer of protective substance is typically only a few atomic layers thick and may be formed by known techniques such as chemical vapour deposition or low pressure chemical vapour deposition. Other possible techniques for applying the protective substance include spray pyrolysis, evaporation, sputtering, thermal oxidation and thermal nitridation. As a further alternative, the layer of protective substance may be a layer of polymer, and is applied to the surface of the semiconductor as a layer that is sufficiently thin that it has a plurality of holes through it. In this form of the first embodiment, the etching step is suitably carried out by plasma etching. Suitably, the polymer is applied by spin coating. Examples of suitable polymers is include polymeric photoresists used in integrated circuit manufacture. Examples of suitable plasmas for etching silicon include SF6, CF4 and mixtures of CF4 and oxygen.
In one form of the process of the first embodiment of the invention, the layer of protective substance is applied by low pressure chemical vapour deposition, is typically about 2 nm thick, and is an incomplete layer in that it contains numerous holes though which the semiconductor material beneath the protective layer can be etched.
In the process of the second embodiment, the layer of protective substance may be deposited on the semiconductor material by any of the ways referred to above in reference to the process of the first embodiment. In the process of the second embodiment, the layer of protective substance, as deposited, is typically thicker than in the process of the first embodiment so that, when the layer is applied to the semiconductor, it has no apertures passing through it. However, a layer of protective substance applied to a surface is never of perfectly uniform thickness and when such a layer is gradually thinned, eventually a plurality of apertures is formed in the layer at the positions where it was thinnest prior to the etching. That is, as the layer is thinned, the thickness of the layer is decreased by substantially the same amount over its entire extent, until at least some portions of the layer are thinned through, so creating a plurality of apertures through the layer of protective substance.
In the process of the second embodiment, the step of thinning the layer of protective substance is typically an etching step. The etchant may be any etchant capable of etching the protective substance uniformly. Such etchants are known to persons of ordinary skill in the art and include various acids and acid mixtures, and plasmas. When the protective substance is a polymer, it is preferably thinned by plasma etching, typically using an oxygen plasma.
Typically, the apertures in the layer of protective substance are substantially randomly arranged over the surface of the protective substance, since they arise from substantially random variations in the thickness of the layer of protective substance. After the process of the first or second embodiment is carried out, therefore, etch pits remain in the semiconductor material that are substantially randomly arranged over the surface of the semiconductor material. The interior surface of the etch pits, which have the appearance of hollows formed in the surface of the semiconductor material, is usually, but not necessarily, at least partially rounded. That is, although there may be some faceting on the interior surface of the etch pits, at least part of the interior surface is usually not faceted and flat but has at least some concave regions as a result of the action of the etchant on the semiconductor material. More typically, at least half of the interior surface of the etch pits is rounded. Preferably, there is substantially no faceting on the interior surface of the etch pits. The etch pits are typically substantially circular when viewed from above the surface, except where they intersect. In some circumstances, however, the etch pits may not appear substantially circular when viewed from above, depending on the crystal orientation of the semiconductor material. Whatever their shape, the etch pits typically range in size up to about 10 μm across. More usually, the etch pits range in size from less than 1 μm to about 5 μm across. The etch pits are separated by walls that are typically thinner than the widths of the pits. Usually, at least some of the walls are substantially unetched. However, the majority of the walls are usually formed between etch pits that overlap and therefore come to a point at their top.
The etchant in the processes of the first and second embodiments may be any etchant that is capable of etching the semiconductor material faster than the protective substance. Such etchants are known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. Where an etchant is used to thin the layer of protective substance in the process of the second embodiment, it may be the same as or different to the etchant used to etch the semiconductor. When the layer of protective substance is a polymer layer, a plasma is usually used to etch the semiconductor.
The processes of the present invention result in a decreased reflectivity of a surface of a semiconductor material, compared to a polished surface, and/or they improve the light confinement (light trapping) within the semiconductor material.
In the processes of the invention, the point where an optimal degree of texturing of the semiconductor surface has been reached and etching should be terminated can be determined in several ways. One way is to monitor the appearance of a surface that is being textured, such as by eye or by using an apparatus which measures the reflectance of light from the surface. A second way is to determine, for a given set of conditions (that is, the nature of the protecting substance, its thickness, the etchant composition and the temperature) the amount of time for optimal results. This can be done by etching samples for various lengths of time and then measuring the reflectance and/or light trapping behaviour of the etched samples under appropriate conditions. The results of such measurements then allow determination of the optimal etch time. It will be appreciated, however, that if an etch solution is used to texture many wafers or many batches of wafers, the etch properties of the solution will change over time. The etch time will then need to be adjusted to continue to obtain optimal texturing results.
In the processes of the present invention, the step of contacting the semiconductor material with the etchant may result in the protective substance being etched to some extent, depending on the etchant used and the etching conditions. If the protective substance is etched to some extent during this step, this may result in more apertures being created in the protective substance, compared to the number of apertures present in the protective substance at the commencement of this step.
Immediately before the start of the step of contacting the semiconductor material with the etchant, the apertures in the layer of protective substance are very small, typically less than 100 nm in diameter, more typically less than 10 nm in diameter. As the etching step proceeds, the apertures tend to become enlarged and their number tends to increase. At the end of this etching step, the number of apertures, and therefore the number of etch pits in the semiconductor surface, typically ranges from about 10 per 100 square microns to about 1000 per 100 square microns.
Typically, in the processes of the first and second embodiments and in the semiconductor material of the third, fourth, fifth and sixth embodiments, the semiconductor material is silicon. When the semiconductor material is silicon, in the processes of the invention the protective substance is typically silicon nitride and the etchant is typically a mixture of hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid, such as a 1:50 by volume mixture of 49% by weight aqueous HF (that is, 49 g of HF in 100 g of aqueous solution) and 70% by weight aqueous nitric acid. Other chemicals may be added to the etchant solution to give desired etch properties, such as to improve wetting of the semiconductor surface. Such additives are well known to persons of ordinary skill in the art of semiconductor etching. When the semiconductor material is silicon, it may be single crystal silicon, microcrystalline silicon, multicrystalline silicon or polycrystalline silicon. A further possibility as an etchant for silicon nitride is a plasma of CF4 and oxygen.
The processes of the present invention typically include the further step of removing the protective substance from the surface after the step of etching the semiconductor material has proceeded sufficiently to produce a plurality of etch pits on the surface. The protective substance may be removed by applying an etchant that etches the protective substance much more rapidly than the semiconductor material. For example, when the semiconductor material is silicon and the protective substance is silicon nitride, the protective substance may be removed by reactive ion etching or by contact with phosphoric acid at elevated temperature, typically about 180° C. Alternatively, and more preferably, silicon nitride may be removed from a silicon substrate by etching in an aqueous solution of hydrogen fluoride, typically a 5% by weight solution of hydrogen fluoride in water.
Even more typically, the processes of the present invention include the additional steps of removing the layer of protective substance after the step of etching the semiconductor material has proceeded sufficiently to produce a plurality of etch pits on the surface, and then applying an antireflective layer over the entire surface by conventional methods. It has been found that in this way, a substantially greater decrease in reflectivity is obtainable, compared to applying an antireflective coating alone.
Typically, a process of the first embodiment or the second embodiment can give rise to a surface from which about 50% less visible light is reflected, compared to a polished surface. If an antireflective coating is applied to a surface that has been textured by a process of the present invention, an even greater decrease in the amount of visible light reflected by the surface can be achieved.
When the semiconductor material is silicon and the layer of protective substance is a layer of silicon nitride about 2 nm thick, the step of etching the semiconductor may be achieved by contacting with a 1:50 (v/v) HF/nitric acid mixture as described above for a time of a few minutes, typically 2-5 minutes, at ordinary room temperatures.
In some instances it may be desirable to grow a thin (for example, 20-30 nm) layer of silicon dioxide on a silicon substrate prior to silicon nitride deposition. The growth of the oxide is not necessary for carrying out the process of the present invention (it has been observed that the process of the present invention is unaffected by the presence of a layer of silicon dioxide below the silicon nitride protective substance, except for a small increase in the time taken for the process to be completed). It has been found, however, that the presence of such an oxide layer helps to avoid degradation of the electronic properties of the silicon substrate, which is sometimes observed when no oxide is present under the layer of silicon nitride.
The process of the present invention are particularly advantageous for texturing surfaces which are not accessible to radiation, such as surfaces of silicon strips held in a frame of silicon and produced as described in International Patent Application No. WO 02/45143. Thus, in one preferred form of the invention, the semiconductor material is a strip of silicon having a thickness of less than 100 μm and a width of up to about 3 nmm and wherein at least one opposite pair of surfaces has been textured by a process according to the present invention. That is, each of at least one pair of opposite surfaces has a plurality of pits therein wherein the pits are substantially randomly distributed over the surface of the strip, and have an interior surface which is at least partially rounded, and/or have a width of up to 10 μm.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are hereinafter described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, which are briefly described as follows.
The accompanying Figures are provided to facilitate an understanding of the invention. It will be appreciated that
In the case where the depressions in the nitride layer do not extend all the way through the nitride layer, the silicon substrate is immersed in a solution which etches the silicon nitride. This solution could be, for example, a solution of 49% by weight aqueous hydrofluoric acid diluted with ten times its volume of water, or a mixture of hydrofluoric and nitric acid, such as a 1:50 by volume mixture of 49% by weight aqueous HF and 70% by weight nitric acid. The silicon nitride layer is gradually thinned in a uniform fashion. Eventually the nitride layer becomes sufficiently thin that the deepest depressions 3 expose the surface of silicon substrate 1, creating a plurality of apertures 5 in nitride layer 2. This is shown in
Silicon substrate 1 is now immersed in a solution which etches silicon much faster than it etches silicon nitride, such as a 1:50 by volume mixture of 49% by weight aqueous HF and 70% by weight nitric acid. This results in the formation of etch pits 6 in silicon substrate 1 at the locations where apertures 5 had been formed, as shown in
As the etching proceeds, the silicon nitride layer 2 is also thinned slightly. This may result in further apertures 7 being created in it. These apertures 7 will then also lead to the formation of etch pits 8 in the silicon substrate, as is shown in
Etching can be carried out over a range of temperatures. In particular, lower temperatures generally lead to a lower etch rate of silicon nitride compared to the etch rate of silicon, so that etching at 0° C. rather than room temperature, for example, may be desirable in some circumstances. The silicon nitride layer may also be treated to decrease its etch rate in a range of silicon etchants. For example, annealing of silicon nitride at high temperatures (1000-1100° C.) generally results in a decrease in its etch rate in silicon etchants.
The above texturing technique is particularly advantageous for thin film silicon cells since it only consumes a small amount of silicon in the texturing process (approximately 2-3 microns on each textured surface). The texturing technique can be applied to silicon wafers or films of arbitrary grain size.
In all of the following examples, deposition of silicon nitride was carried out by low pressure chemical vapour deposition at 750° C. with a dichlorosilane flowrate of 30 standard cubic centimetres per minute (sccm), an ammonia flow rate of 120 sccm and a pressure of 70 Pa. Typical deposition time was 75 seconds.
A silicon nitride layer approximately 2 nm thick was deposited on a polished silicon wafer of (111) orientation. A sample was cut out of the wafer and etched in a solution of 1:50 hydrofluoric acid:nitric acid at 0° C. The sample was encapsulated behind 1 mm thick low iron glass using silicone and its reflectance was measured using a spectrophotometer with an integrating sphere. The sample had a reflectivity of 11% at 900 nm, while a polished encapsulated silicon reference wafer had a reflectivity of 24% and a sample of (100) oriented silicon textured with inverted pyramids had a reflectivity, of 8% at the same wavelength. These results indicate that the texturing process is very effective at reducing reflection from the silicon surface.
A 100 mm diameter, 1 mm thick, (110) oriented silicon wafer was used. Thin silicon strips spaced 105 microns apart and approximately 70 microns thick were produced in the wafer, following the processes described in International Patent Application no. WO 02/45143. The sidewalls of the thin silicon strips so produced are highly polished. It was desired to texture the sidewalls as they would form the sunward facing surfaces in a solar cell.
A thin layer of silicon nitride was deposited on the wafer. One of the thin silicon strips was broken out of the wafer and mounted on the wafer surface. In this way, the sidewall surface of one of the silicon strips was clearly visible during the etching process. After a period of approximately 5 minutes etching at room temperature with the same etchant described in Example 1, the strips had textured optimally and etching was terminated. The silicon strips were now approximately 65 microns thick.
Measurements were carried out to determine the degree of light confinement (light trapping) within the textured silicon.
Several (111) oriented, >1000 ohm-cm, boron doped float-zoned silicon wafers were used. An oxide approximately 30 nm thick was thermally grown on the wafers. A thin layer of silicon nitride was then deposited and the wafers were textured as described in Example 2. Following texturing, the wafers were given a phosphorus diffusion and a 30 nm thick oxide was thermally grown. The wafers were then given an anneal in a mixture of 5% hydrogen and 95% nitrogen at 430° C. for 30 minutes. The emitter saturation current density following these treatments was measured to be 20-25 fA/cm2 per side. This low value indicates that excellent surface passivation can be achieved on the textured surfaces.
Advantages of the Processes of the Present Invention
The processes of the present invention provide relatively simple and inexpensive ways of reducing the reflectivity of a surface of a semiconductor material. Further, the processes of the present invention permit surfaces to be textured (and thereby have their reflectivity reduced) which are not exposed to radiation and which are therefore incapable of being textured by reactive ion etching, for example. Still further, the processes of the present invention are applicable to surfaces of (111) crystallographic orientation, which are not capable of being textured by etching with anisotropic etchants such as potassium hydroxide.
Many modifications of the processes described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings and Examples will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/AU01/01546 | Nov 2001 | WO | international |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/AU02/01625 | 11/29/2002 | WO | 00 | 11/8/2004 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO03/047004 | 6/5/2003 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3278811 | Mori et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
| 3422527 | Gault | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3647581 | Mash | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3690953 | Wise | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3985579 | Rahilly | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4038104 | Tsutomu | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4082570 | House et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4110122 | Kaplow et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4153476 | Frosh et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4278473 | Borden | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4332973 | Sater | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4406913 | Weyrich | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4409422 | Sater | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4409423 | Holt et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4444992 | Cox, III et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4516314 | Sater | May 1985 | A |
| 4527183 | Anthony et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4554727 | Deckman | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4626613 | Wenham et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4633031 | Todorof et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4686321 | Kishi | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4692782 | Seki et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4805006 | Yamaguchi et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4883561 | Gmitter et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4892592 | Dickson et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4982099 | Lischke | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4989059 | Micheels et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5011544 | Gaddy et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5016073 | Elliott et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5067985 | Carver et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5073230 | Maracas et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5081049 | Green et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5082791 | Micheels et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5098482 | Warfield | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5116464 | Edell et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5136346 | Kornowski | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5139974 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5149676 | Kim et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5266125 | Rand et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5279703 | Haberger et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5306647 | Lehmann et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5324679 | Kim et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5330584 | Saga et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5344517 | Houlding | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5352530 | Tanuma et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5367217 | Norling | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5389158 | Fraas et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5391236 | Krut et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5447576 | Willis | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5461002 | Safir | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466302 | Carey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470761 | McKee et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474620 | Nath et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5478402 | Hanoka | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5494832 | Lehmann et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5538563 | Finkl | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538902 | Izu et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5567248 | Chung | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5567656 | Chun | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5609694 | Asai | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5641381 | Bailey et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5733382 | Hanoka | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5773791 | Kuykendal | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5851928 | Cripe et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852322 | Speckbacher | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5895530 | Shrotriya et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902120 | Igel et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904546 | Wood et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904548 | Orcutt et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5930644 | Tsai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5972732 | Gee et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5985742 | Henley et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994641 | Kardauskas | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997713 | Beetz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005276 | Forrest et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008449 | Cole | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6066516 | Miyasaka et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6074514 | Bjorkman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6091021 | Ruby et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6107161 | Kitaguro et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110793 | Lee et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6126311 | Schuh | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6127623 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6127714 | Mochizuki | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6130380 | Nakamura | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140603 | Hwang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6143976 | Endrōs | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156620 | Puchner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6156967 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6156968 | Nishimoto et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162658 | Green et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166318 | Freeouf | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168968 | Umemoto et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6172297 | Hezel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6180869 | Meier et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6184457 | Tsuzuki et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6262358 | Kamimura et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265653 | Haigh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265741 | Schrems | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6294723 | Uematsu et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
| 6316281 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6320115 | Kataoka et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6320116 | Hanoka | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323415 | Uematsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6406979 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6407327 | Ralph et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6407329 | Lino et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6410843 | Kishi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6455873 | Lonergan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6479744 | Tsuzuki et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6492704 | Coroy | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6515217 | Aylaian | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6515218 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6525374 | Sittig et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6553729 | Nath et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6583032 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6846984 | Fath et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 20010013630 | Cho et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020119290 | Park et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20040097012 | Weber et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040119067 | Weeks et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20050272225 | Weber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3803769 | Aug 1989 | DE |
| 19650111 | Jun 1998 | DE |
| 19907506 | Sep 1999 | DE |
| 0 083 510 | Jul 1983 | EP |
| 0 718 873 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0 991 129 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 1 182 710 | Feb 2002 | EP |
| 1 383 165 | Feb 1975 | GB |
| S53-073075 | Jun 1978 | JP |
| 58010873 | Jan 1983 | JP |
| 59059883 | Apr 1984 | JP |
| S59-123279 | Jul 1984 | JP |
| S59-123283 | Jul 1984 | JP |
| S61-108176 | May 1986 | JP |
| S62-054927 | Mar 1987 | JP |
| 63295500 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 3-6824 | Jan 1991 | JP |
| 3-276682 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 6-55733 | Mar 1994 | JP |
| H06-213554 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| 07188947 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| 7-302890 | Nov 1995 | JP |
| 8274371 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 09-219531 | Aug 1997 | JP |
| 10193338 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| 11074234 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| AH11-068131 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 11090923 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| 11163284 | Jun 1999 | JP |
| H11-236689 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 11-312815 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 11-312816 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 2000-36609 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2000-101111 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000-261008 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| A2000-277763 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| A2001-257371 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2001-332529 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2002-217439 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 9809318 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 9824119 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| 9825312 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| 9832164 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 0028602 | May 2000 | WO |
| 0062348 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| 0073090 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0245143 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 03047004 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050104163 A1 | May 2005 | US |
