Embodiments of the invention relate generally to integrated circuits, and more particularly, in one or more of the illustrated embodiments, to integrated circuit sense amplifiers.
Current mode sense amplifiers (CSAs) have been used in integrated circuits to sense and amplify differential input currents. For example, in applications in semiconductor memory, the CSAs are often used to sense and amplify input currents resulting from reading memory cell data and being provided over long signal lines. As a result, the input currents are typically very weak and low in magnitude. In applications such as these, control of the CSA's loop gain is important because it affects the operating characteristics of the CSA. That is, where the loop gain of a CSA is approximately equal to 1, the dominant mode of operation for the CSA is sensing differential input currents. In contrast, as the loop gain of a CSA increases to be greater than 1, the dominant mode of operation for the CSA transitions from current sensing to behaving as a latch circuit. Thus, controlling loop gain is desirable in order to control the behavior of the CSA.
Certain details are set forth below to provide a sufficient understanding of embodiments of the invention. However, it will be clear to one skilled in the art that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these particular details. Moreover, the particular embodiments of the present invention described herein are provided by way of example and should not be used to limit the scope of the invention to these particular embodiments. In other instances, well-known circuits, control signals, timing protocols, and software operations have not been shown in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the invention.
A bias circuit 210 according to an embodiment of the invention is shown in
The loop gain for the bias circuit 210 (i.e., gm230·R240), where gm230 is the transconductance of transistor 230, is:
As a result, the loop gain for the bias circuit 210 is constant (i.e., gm230·R240=1) for
(W/L)232=4·(W/L)230
With the transistors 230, 232 scaled accordingly, for example, (W/L) ratio for transistor 230 is four times the (W/L) ratio for transistor 232, the bias circuit 210 has a loop gain that is 1, and is substantially constant despite variations in process, voltage, and/or temperature. For example, where the resistance of the resistance 240 is lower due to variation in the fabrication process, the gm increases due to an increased current Ibmr resulting from the lower resistance, and likewise, the Vbias also related to Ibmr changes as well. As a result, the product of gm and R, that is, the loop gain for the bias circuit 210, is kept substantially despite the variation in R.
An amplifier stage 250 according to an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The amplifier stage 250 includes transistors 260, 262, such as n-channel metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) transistors, having gates cross coupled to the drains of the other transistor. Transistors 270, 272 are coupled to sources of the transistors 260, 262, respectively, and have sources coupled to a reference node, such as ground. Gates of the transistors 270, 272 are coupled to receive a Vbias voltage from the bias circuit 202. Resistances 280, 282 having magnitudes R are coupled to drains of the transistors 260, 282, respectively, and coupled to receive Vcc. The amplifier stage 250 senses and amplifies current at input-output (IO) nodes IO, IOb 290, 292. As known, the loop gain for the amplifier stage 250 for matched transistors 260, 262 and matched resistances 280, 282 is:
gm260·R280=gm262·R282
Operation of the amplifier stage 250 will be described with the Vbias provided by the bias circuit 210 of
With the transistors and resistances matched and Vbias provided to the amplifier stage 250 by a the matched bias circuit 210, the loop gain of the amplifier stage 250 will be generally independent of process, voltage, and/or temperature variations. For example, again considering the case where the resistance of the resistance 240 is lower due to variation in the fabrication process, the resistance of the resistances 280, 282 would also be lower since they were subjected to the same variation in the fabrication process. As previously discussed, the Vbias generated by the bias circuit 210 changes as a result of the change in Ibmr due to the lower resistance of the resistance 240. Turning to the amplifier stage, the Vbias voltage from the bias circuit 210 sets the transistors 270, 272 (which are matched to transistor 230 of the bias circuit 210) to the same bias condition of transistor 230. This in turn adjusts the bias current of the amplifier stage 250 in the same manner Ibmr of the bias circuit 210 was altered by the lower resistance of the resistance 240. As a result, the gm of the amplifier stage 250 will increase (as it did for the bias circuit 210) due to the increased bias current to compensate for the decreased R of resistances 280, 282 and the loop gain of the amplifier stage 250 remains substantially constant despite the variation in R. Generally the Vbias voltage can be used to change the bias current of the amplifier stage, which in turn changes the gm of the amplifier stage. As a result, the loop gain (i.e., gm·R) can be controlled by adjusting the Vbias voltage, for example, to be substantially constant.
In some embodiments, the transistors 260, 262, 270, 272 and resistances 280, 282 are not matched to transistors 230, 232 and resistance 240, as previously described. For example, transistors 260, 262 and transistors 270, 272 are designed (e.g., scaled) to provide transconductances k times the transconductance of transistor 230 of the bias circuit 210, and the magnitude of the resistances 280, 282 are (1/k) times the magnitude of resistance 240 of the bias circuit 210. Although the transistors are not matched, the amplifier stage 250 has a loop gain substantially equal to the loop gain of the bias circuit, that is, 1. In some embodiments, the transistors 260, 262, 270, 272 and resistances 280, 282 are designed to provide a amplifier stage having a loop gain other than 1. For example, where the loop gain of the amplifier stage 250 is greater than 1, the amplifier stage exhibits a latch circuit behavior.
In operation, the amplifier stage 704 operates in the same manner as previously described with reference to the amplifier stage 250. However, the transistors 710, 712 are conductive during sensing and amplifying of current. The transistors 710, 712 are made conductive in response to an active enable signal En1b. To latch a sensed state of the amplifier stage, the transistors 710, 712 are deactivated (i.e., no longer conductive) and the transistors 720, 722 are activated by an active enable signal En2b.
The row and column addresses are provided by the address latch 810 to a row address decoder 822 and a column address decoder 828, respectively. The column address decoder 828 selects bit lines extending through the array 802 corresponding to respective column addresses. The row address decoder 822 is connected to word line driver 824 that activates respective rows of memory cells in the array 802 corresponding to received row addresses. The selected data line (e.g., a bit line or bit lines) corresponding to a received column address are coupled to a read/write circuitry 830 to provide read data to a data output buffer 834 via an input-output data bus 840. Write data are applied to the memory array 802 through a data input buffer 844 and the memory array read/write circuitry 830. The read/write circuitry 830 includes at least one sense amplifier 832 according to an embodiment of the invention. Read data and write data provided to the read/write circuitry 830 is transmitted over input-output lines and are amplified by the sense amplifier 832 to be provided to the output buffer 834 and before being written to the memory array 802.
From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/694,136, filed Jan. 26, 2010, which application is incorporated herein by reference, in its entirety, for any purpose.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4284957 | Haque | Aug 1981 | A |
4502020 | Nelson et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4555673 | Huijsing et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4586166 | Shah | Apr 1986 | A |
4792923 | Nakase et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4837523 | Wright | Jun 1989 | A |
4843343 | Pace | Jun 1989 | A |
5473567 | McClure | Dec 1995 | A |
5477497 | Park et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489874 | Tanoi | Feb 1996 | A |
5493533 | Lambrache | Feb 1996 | A |
5504442 | Tanoi | Apr 1996 | A |
5514986 | Tanoi | May 1996 | A |
5654928 | Lee et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5710739 | Calligaro et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5815451 | Tsuchida | Sep 1998 | A |
5949730 | Shirley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6127853 | Yu | Oct 2000 | A |
6141246 | Derman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6191989 | Luk et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6271977 | Chung et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292417 | Seyyedy | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6326815 | Sim et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6396310 | Shin | May 2002 | B2 |
6456161 | Smith | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6466499 | Blodgett | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483351 | Sim | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483353 | Kim et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6617885 | Lim et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6721218 | Lim | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6738302 | Parris et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6750714 | McIntyre | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6798250 | Wile | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6831503 | La Rosa | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6870425 | Leifso et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879217 | Visocchi | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879533 | Chae et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894564 | Gilbert | May 2005 | B1 |
6944066 | Jing | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7038963 | Lee | May 2006 | B2 |
7075368 | Lin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7154331 | Zaguri | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154923 | Kucharski | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7218166 | Yanagisawa et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7262638 | Shim | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265620 | Liu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286011 | Chang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286425 | Barth, Jr. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7342451 | Brueske | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7368991 | Swanson | May 2008 | B2 |
7446609 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7477076 | Miyatake | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7521992 | Hagleitner et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7564295 | Ker et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7629817 | Nedovic et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7777568 | Lim | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786764 | Cheng | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7813199 | Morgan | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7889006 | Jones | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7956641 | Peng et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7990792 | Abe et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8030972 | Jansson | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049535 | Van Tran et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8283950 | Willey | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289796 | Lee | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8344806 | Franck et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8472898 | Rofougaran | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20030179842 | Kane et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20060220459 | Kulasekeram | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060273831 | Maksimovic et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090267668 | Lin | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110182129 | Lee | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110235450 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120038405 | Willey | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120326786 | Willey | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130015899 | Willey | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130027133 | Lee | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130009705 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12694136 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 13619763 | US |