This invention relates to test equipment and in particular to a system for testing using noncontact electro-optical imaging of a flat panel device such as a liquid crystal display.
Diagnostic sensor placement requirements are extremely high. A flat sensor plate that is part of a sensing head which measures approximately 8 cm on each side must be placed parallel within 3 um of a flat workpiece, such as an LCD glass panel. The gap distance between the workpiece panel and sensor plate needs to be a selectable value between 7 um and 30 um and preferably between 10 um and 25 um with a tolerance of +/−0.5 um. Component hardware used to position the sensing head cannot encroach upon the clear 8 cm square aperture of the sensing head because the sensing head produces information that is read by an optical array (a CCD camera) focused on the clear aperture.
The sensing head must be able to maintain the required gap position without contacting the glass panel even when added attracting electrostatic forces resulting from a high voltage applied between the sensor plate of the sensing head and panel are present.
The sensing head must be quickly separable from the panel surface to a gap of greater than 75 um to permit translation of the elements without contact between the panel and the sensor plate as the sensing head is moved over the panel to another site. Once the sensing head arrives at the new site, the gap must be quickly reduced to the low gap position to allow the sensing head to acquire data.
Sensor placement above the panel must compensate for the variation of panel surface height from the sensor datum.
The invention presents methods, apparatuses, and systems for positioning a sensing head relative to a workpiece, involving a control unit operative to provide a plurality of control signals to iteratively control positioning of the sensing head relative to the workpiece, a plurality of air injectors disposed and fixedly connected on a periphery of the sensing head, each of the air injectors capable of being independently controlled to eject a gas between the sensing head and the workpiece to create an air bearing and affect positioning of the sensing head relative to the workpiece in response to at least one of the control signals, and a plurality of sensors providing a plurality of feedback signals to the control unit, the feedback signals containing information relating to positioning of an optical imaging sensing head relative to the workpiece.
In one embodiment, a system is provided wherein a plurality of high accuracy air injectors are disposed along the edges of a sensor plate of a sensing head to form an air bearing and a plurality of high displacement air injectors are also disposed along the edges of the sensor plate to form an air bearing, each independently controlled, with the sensing head having sensors coupled in a feedback loop through a mapper which iteratively adjusts relative separation of the sensor plate and a flat panel workpiece to the desired positional accuracy through digital to analog converters supplying control signals to analog amplifiers controlling orifices. Translation is effected after the high displacement air injectors are activated, with the combination of flow of air from the air bearing outlets along the edge of the sensor plate and the translation in x and y of the flat panel being operative to air brush sweep the surface of the flat panel.
Translation of the LCD glass panel is effected after the high displacement air injectors are activated, with the combination of flow of air from the air injector outlets along the edge of the sensor plate and the translation in x and y of the flat panel being operative to air brush sweep the surface of the flat panel.
The placement of the air injectors to the side of the sensing head is important. Air leakage path between the surface of the air injector and the surface of the sensor plate is to be minimized. A means is provided for sealing the air leakage path between the air injector and the corner radius of the sensor plate edge.
In addition, edge placement of the of the injectors fulfills the requirement of sweeping the particulates out of the path of the advancing sensor, thus reducing or eliminating sensing head and panel abrasion damage.
The invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The optical head 24 senses illumination through a CCD array 28 reflecting illumination from a light source 30 redirected through a partially reflective mirror 32. An optical imaging surface 36 of the sensor plate 38 of the sensing head 12 is translatable relative to optics 34 to focus reflected light onto the CCD array 28.
From (three) positions (L1, L2, L3,
Imaging statistics at selected positions (S1, S2, S3, S4,
Spacing of the sensor plate 38 from the workpiece 14 is controlled by two different types of air injectors 50-52 and 53-55, all mounted on the sensing head 12 along the side edges of the sensor plate 38. A high accuracy, close positioning air injector set 50-52 comprises a plurality of first injector outlets 56-58 along the plate edge 60 whose single orifices 62-64 per outlet are controlled closely by amplifiers 66-68. The orifices are choke flow valves wherein the pressure differential Pout/Pin is <0.5 so that linear voltage change converts to a nearly linear air flow change. A high displacement air injector set 53-55 comprises a plurality of second injector outlets 70-72 along the plate edge 60 whose air source is via a solenoid valve 81 switching air to the second injector outlets 70-72 substantially simultaneously to lift the sensor plate 38 to be clear of any obstructions.
The valve orifices 62-64 have a diameter of about 100-250 um and the outlets 56-58 have a diameter of about 750 um. The high flow outlets have a diameter of about 750 um.
The sensing head 12 utilizes edge-fed air injectors, such as air injectors 53-55, as contrasted to the center-fed air injectors of prior known air bearing designs. The spacing of the gap is sufficiently close that air serves as an adequate damper to prevent inertial oscillation of the sensing head when position is changed. One configuration is shown in FIG. 3. Air injected at opposing edge locations into the gap between the sensor plate surface and panel workpiece 14 maintains the correct gap between the sensor plate 38 and panel workpiece 14 according to the required tolerances (˜1 um to 30 um +/−0.5 um). Control of this gap of distance d is achieved by controlling the volume of air flow into the sensor plate/panel workpiece interface at opposing edges where three injector outlets 56, 57, 58 are flush mounted to the sensing head 12 with the face of the outlets being substantially exactly at the same height as the sensor plate 38. The amount of air flow to each injector is determined by information (image data related to luminosity) from image statistic sensors (S1, S2, S3, S4,
The sensor plate height d is automatically regulated to the correct position above the panel by software of the mapper 80 controlling the volume of air injected into the air injector orifices. Irregularities of workpiece panel surfaces are accounted for by adjusting the airflow though each edge-mounted air injector as required to maintain the needed gap. Lateral movement of the sensor plate 38 over the panel 14 surface is inhibited via the cantilever suspension system where each or a pair of parallel leaf springs 26 is wide compared to thickness so that there is high stiffness in the x and y directions parallel to the sensor plate 38 and thus the panel 14. Other restraint systems are possible.
It is important to note that the desired gap is thus achieved for a wide variety of sensor plate orientations and surface profiles.
In the CPU, the software provides the functions of gathering image statistics from the N image statistic sensors (typically 4) S1, S2, S3, S4, which are transformed to measure the three dimensions of movement z, θx and θy (a.k.a. virtual sensors V1, V2, V3), which is then used to adjusted the control air flow of the high accuracy, close positioning air injectors P1, P2, P3.
In a specific embodiment of three high accuracy, close positioning air injectors disposed at positions P1, P2, P3 (
Hence, the mapping of R^3 to R^n (pressure space to image statistics sensor space) is transformed into a differentiable, non-singular map from R^3 to R^3 (pressure space to virtual sensor space).
When the differential image statistics sensor values are out of tolerance, the low flow air injector settings are iteratively adjusted using a variation of Newton's method, specifically:
It has been found that this procedure has several advantages over known techniques for sensing an output for feedback:
The LVDT sensors are a common type of position sensor. The primary purpose of the LVDT sensors is to define and reproduce a defined focus position (the center of the depth of field of the camera optics). However, they are also used in the following contexts:
Several mappings are obtained, as indicated schematically:
[pressure space] [image statistics sensor space] [virtual sensor space]
S( ):=Implicitly defined function; where the pressure settings indirectly determine image statistics sensor values.
Mapping is according to the following equations, using the referenced notation:
V( ):=(s1, s2, s3, s4)→(s1′, s2′, s3′, s4′)
((s1′+s2′+s3′+s4′)/4, (s1′+s2′−s3′−s4′)
˜(z, dZx, dZy)
→(z, z+dzx, z+dzy)
:=(v1, v2, v3)
This assumes exactly four sensor regions.
The first transformation (si→si′) yields micron units.
The resulting (v1, v2, v3) virtual sensors are in micron units which are at a fixed (vector) offset from the LVDT sensors.
L(z):=Map from the low pressure space to adjusted LVDT space (depends on Z-stage position).
It is important that the face of the sensing head structure of the edge of the sensing head 12 be flush.
Referring to
The invention has been explained with reference to specific embodiments. Other embodiments will be evident to those of ordinary skill in the art. It is therefore not intended that this invention be limited, except as indicated by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4818838 | Young et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4884697 | Takacs et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5615039 | Henley | Mar 1997 | A |
5898179 | Smick et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6151153 | Bryan | Nov 2000 | A |
6211991 | Bryan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220080 | Fauque | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6285102 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6545500 | Field | Apr 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020059014 A1 | May 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60204918 | May 2000 | US |