1. Field of the Invention
The present invention pertains to measuring small electric fields and, more particularly, to a sensor system for measuring one or more vector components of an electric field generated by an object in a non-conducting or poorly conducting medium utilizing at least one capacitive electric sensor which is spaced from the surface of the object and mounted a predetermined distance from another sensor.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
It is widely known that electric fields are developed from many different sources. For example, organs in the human body, including the heart and brain, produce small electric fields. In addition, there is a need to measure larger electric fields produced in other areas, such as geophysics and power lines at ranges where the fields are small. For a variety of reasons, it can be desirable to measure these electric fields. The prior art has focused on methods of measuring the distribution of electric potentials on conducting surfaces by burying or otherwise inserting metal rods into the ground in the case of geophysical measurements at the earth's surface, and using gel-coated electrodes placed directly on the skin of a patient in the case of measurements taken in the practice of medicine. In either case, the measurement instruments, e.g., the metal rods or electrodes, are in direct contact with the surface. Taking measurements of the electric potential at a position spaced from a surface is more demanding. Additional difficulties arise in measuring a field normal to a conducting surface or measuring multiple orthogonal components of an electric field, particularly when one of those components is not parallel to a local conducting surface. Although some prior art exists in connection with determining maximum electric fields by measuring multiple components of the fields, such as represented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,242,911, these arrangements address large electric fields, such as those associated with power generation equipment. Indeed, such arrangements are specifically designed to have reduced sensitivity and are not suited to measure small fields.
It should be realized that the terms electric field and electric potential at a point in space are sometimes used as if they are synonymous. This represents a technical error of convenience in the sense that what is often actually measured is the electric potential relative to some other voltage. The terms are equivalent in the sense that this measured potential would not differ from the voltage to which it is compared if an electric field were not present. As a result, the terms electric potential and electric field are sometimes used interchangeably in the literature, often inaccurately. Indeed, although it might be stated that an electric field is measured, it may actually be the time variation of the potential that is measured. In the majority of cases, electric potentials are simply measured relative to a common potential of no well-defined physical position (often termed the “ground”) and a simple map of these potentials recorded by plotting the potential values at the specific measurement positions relative to the common reference is produced.
Some work has been conducted in connection with measuring cardiac waveforms, with some equivalent work also being done on imaging the potentials produced by electrical circuit boards. An area of considerable scientific and commercial importance that could be significantly improved by the measurement of multiple components of the electric field is the characterization of electrical activity in the human body. In the current practice, a set of electric potential measurements are taken at desired points on the skin via electrically conducting contacts, or capacitive coupling with a high value of capacitance created when the sensors are directly attached to the skin. The former contacts are made by conducting electrodes that touch the skin, with considerable effort being made to ensure a reliable resistive contact. The latter are made by insulated electrodes that also touch the skin in order to ensure a high value of the mutual capacitance. The resulting time-varying distribution of skin surface potentials has been effectively used in diagnosing heart disease and mapping brain functions.
However, interpretation of the surface potential can be complicated since a given surface potential distribution may be generated by more than one source. In other words, the implications about the underlying source may not be unique. One way to augment present measurements on the body surface would be to measure the electric field (En) in a direction normal to the body. Because contact to the skin is required, conventional electrodes touching the skin cannot measure the electric potential off the body, and therefore cannot measure the electric field En.
To address the problem of a lack of uniqueness, physical assumptions and mathematical operations have been used to estimate the underlying electrical sources from the measured surface electric potential distribution. A particular practical example is high-resolution electroencephalogram (EEG) which estimates the distribution of electrical activity at the brain surface from measurements taken directly at the outer surface of the scalp. If a dense array of surface electrodes is used, e.g., a 64- or a 131-channel EEG, a surface Laplacian function can be estimated to improve EEG spatial resolution. For example, the surface Laplacian method applied to 131-channel EEG signals has achieved spatial resolution in the 2-cm range.
It should be noted that capacitive electric potential sensors have also been used to collect simultaneous recordings of electric potential at points spaced from a surface. However, all of these prior measurements have been performed at an equal distance to a conducting surface, e.g., a human body, and did not measure the component of the E-field normal to that surface. Capacitive sensors have also been used on either side of the human body (one about 35 cm from the chest and one about 35 cm from the back) to detect a human heartbeat with electric potential sensors from a considerable distance. However, still no attempt has been made to derive the electric field from the potential measurements or to measure a vector component of the electric field normal to the body surface.
When considering the overall task of measuring the normal vector of the electric field of an object at a position spaced from the object, certainly the compact nature of the sensor system will be of concern, with more compact arrangements being highly favorable, particularly in the medical field. In any case, it should be realized that the electric fields of concern are small, generally much less than 1 volt/meter, such that any reliable information from sensed measurements spaced from the object would require a high level of sensitivity. Based on the above, there exists a need for a compact sensor system that can be employed to effectively and conveniently measure one or more vector components of a small electric field associated with an object, such as for medical purposes, with a high level of sensitivity, utilizing at least one capacitive electric sensor which is spaced from the object.
The present invention is directed to a sensor system for determining one or more components of a small electric field associated with an object by using a capacitive sensor in combination with either a resistive-type sensor or another capacitive sensor to determine magnitude and direction (vector) information of the electric field. The sensor system can be employed to determine a single E-field component normal to a surface of the object or multiple orthogonal components of the electric field. In either case, the two sensors are maintained at a fixed distance apart for generating first and second electric potential signals from which the vector information is determined.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, electric potentials are measured by the capacitive and other sensors at two defined points which are no more than 5 cm apart, while preferably having a sensitivity relative to their input in the range of about 1 mV/Hz1/2 at 1 Hz, in order to determine the electric field. The capacitive sensor preferably includes a flat conducting surface that couples capacitively to the local electric potential, serving to sense the potential, with the flat conducting surface being electrically insulated to prevent the flow of a real electrical current.
In accordance with the most preferred embodiment of the invention, multiple sensors are employed for measuring the electric potential, with the multiple sensors being preferably, rigidly connected together. In one embodiment, the sensors are arranged to determine a vector component of the electric field normal to the object. In another embodiment, the sensors are arranged along at least two orthogonal axes to determine multiple vector components of the electric field. In a further embodiment, the sensors are specifically arranged along predetermined axes from which orthogonal components of the electric field can be readily determined. In any case, the time varying nature of a small electric field can be measured with a high level of sensitivity, while processing both magnitude and directional data significantly enhances the information needed for diagnostic and other evaluation purposes.
Additional objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments when taken in conjunction with the drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts in the several views.
Initially, it is important to note that an object placed in an electric field rises to the potential associated with the field, at least at its geometric center.
In accordance with the invention, an object is considered to be weakly coupled to the local electric potential if its capacitance is less than 10 pF. It has recently become possible to make measurements in the weakly coupled capacitive regime at a sensitivity level of order 10 μV. This has been made possible through advances in solid-state electronic devices and circuit designs such as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 6,680,800 and U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/007446, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. The present invention provides further advances in connection with establishing a compact sensor system 20 that can measure one or more vector components of the electric field at very high sensitivity. To measure the electric field, it is only necessary to measure the potential at two points, subtract one result from the other, and divide by the physical distance, d, between the two points, with k being readily determinable by testing the sensor in a known field.
As will be detailed more fully below, the two measurements can be made by completely different sensors or by connecting two separate potential sensors to an appropriate amplifier with a differential input. The voltage of one sensor can be subtracted in a pair-wise fashion from multiple other sensors to provide the electric field in the direction of the vector joining the measurement points according to the above equation. The electric potential at a point or over a surface can be recorded as a time-varying potential map, without constructing electric field vectors relative to the common ground, or between the points.
By a “compact” sensing system it is meant that the region over which the field is measured is small relative to the spatial variations in the field that are of interest, and/or is sufficiently compact that a system that measures multiple components of the field is of a convenient size, i.e., having a maximum size less than 75 cm. An example of the former criterion is the measurement of the electric fields produced by the human body, which are expected to vary over distances in the order of 3 cm and must accordingly be measured by sensors of equal or smaller size. In addition, such electric fields are small, typically ranging from less than 1 volt/meter to 1 micro-volts/meter at approximately 1 Hz. In fact, the sensor system of the invention is designed with a high sensitivity for use in measuring small electric fields even in the order to 0.1, 0.01, 0.001 and 0.0001 volts per meter at approximately 1 Hz. A particular application of the invention in the field of medicine is to utilize a capacitive potential measurement of the electric field at some separation from the body in conjunction with a second simultaneous electric potential measurement along the same normal vector to the body but at a different separation (or other simultaneous measurement(s) such that the signal contribution along the same normal vector is sufficient and known) in order to measure En.
In
As indicated above, the invention concerns a sensor system for measuring one or more components of an electric field, with at least one vector component being measured by a weakly coupled capacitive sensor. The sensor system is compact and used to perform a weakly coupled capacitive measurement of the electric potential at a sensitivity level needed to record small electrical signals, such as from a human heart or brain. The sensor system must enable measurement of the electric field in free-space, without conducting or high capacitive coupling to any conducting surface. The compact nature of the sensor system means that the part of it that couples to the free-space electric potential has a capacitance in the range of about 0.1 pF to 2 pF.
Reference will now be made to
For measuring the component(s) of the electric field, sensors 230 and 231 of capacitive sensor system 200 are orientated relative to each other in a predetermined manner. Most preferably, sensors 230 and 231 are rigidly connected together at a fixed distance. In addition, in a manner which also applies to sensor system 20, sensor system 200 is compact in that its spatial extent in any direction does not exceed approximately 5 cm and, more preferably, less than 3.5 cm. Again, to give the reader an idea of the size of sensor system 200, a paper clip 250 is shown in relation to sensor system 200. By way of example, certain individual sensors which could be employed in the invention are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/459,267 entitled “Sensor Systems For Measuring Biopotentials” filed Jun. 11, 2003 which is hereby incorporated by reference.
An example of a multi-axis E-field sensor system 300 built according to another embodiment of the invention is shown in
Housing 350 also includes first and second end caps, one of which is indicated at 370. Within housing 350 is the electronics (not shown) associated with sensor system 300 that provide for a first stage high-impedance amplification as will be detailed below. Also projecting from each module 355–357 are respective electrical connectors, such as those indicated at 380–382 for module 355. Electrical connectors 380–382 are provided to link each module 355–357 of housing 350 to electrical components employed in reading and evaluating the signals received from sensor system 300. In addition, each module 355–357 includes an associated power switch, such as power switches 385 and 386 for modules 355 and 356 respectively. At this point, it should be understood that housing 350 could be integrally constructed, while employing only one set of electrical connectors 380–382 and one power switch 385, 386.
With this arrangement, electric fields are constructed in the following manner: EX=kx(V1−V2+V5−V6)/2, EY=kY(V3−V4), EZ=kZ(V1+V2−V5−V6)/2 in which the plate voltages Vi and the constants ki are determined by calibration in a known electric field prior to actual use of sensor system 300. By virtue of the design of the capacitive-type, multi-component electric field sensor system 300 represented in
Sensor system 500 shows a total of five electric potential sensors 530–534. In this embodiment, the field along the vertical axis of the sensor is calculated by subtracting the output of sensor 530 from the average of the outputs of sensors 531–534. If desired, a sixth sensor (not shown) can be positioned on housing 550 of magnetic sensor 552 or on an extension that protrudes below housing 550 to provide a single measurement point for the second potential measurement along the vertical axis. The advantage of the five sensor embodiment 500 shown in
As with the other embodiments disclosed, sensor system 500 is preferably battery powered. The signals recorded by each sensor 530–534 is made relative to the battery voltage that powers sensor system 500. When the common points of the batteries of any two sensors are connected together, the difference of the sensor outputs gives a reading directly proportional to the electric field. In a preferred version of the multi-axis system, one battery unit (not shown) is used for sensors 530–534, thereby ensuring that all measurements are relative to a common reference. In any case, using the approach of
As should be readily apparent from the description set forth above, the invention is concerned with the integration of a free-space capacitive electric potential sensor with another capacitive or resistive sensor measurement of the electric potential to determine one or more vector components of an electric field. The invention can employ a single pair of sensors which are mounted in a fixed, well defined spatial relationship for movement in unison relevant to the object producing the electric field in order to sense a single component of the electric field normal to the object or numerous additional sensors can be employed to determine multiple orthogonal components of the electric field. The orthogonal components can be directly sensed based on the positioning of various pairs of sensors, or the sensors can be arranged along non-perpendicular axes, in which case the orthogonal components can be mathematically determined based on the established geometry. Of course, one common sensor can be utilized in combination with two or more other sensors along the desired axes. In any case, the potential signals can be used to determine vector components (magnitude and direction) of the electric field, with the overall sensing system employing at least one capactive-type electrical sensor which is used to sense electrical potentials at a position spaced from the object. By providing an extremely compact sensor system, use of the invention in particular environments, such as the medical field, is enhanced. Utilizing capacitive-type electrical sensors enables one or more components of an electric field generated by an object, such as a human body, to be advantageously sensed in a noninvasive and unobtrusive manner.
As the particular circuitry employed in connection with the sensor system is not part of the present invention, it will not be described in detail here, but rather reference is again be made to the U.S. patent and patent publications set forth above and incorporated herein by reference. However,
Although the ability to localize the source using the En measurements at 0 cm, 0.5 cm and 1 cm represents an improvement over the scalp potential, the variation of En with lateral distance is less focused about the axis of the source of the field than could be theoretically achieved by a surface Laplacian solution of the surface potential distribution on the scalp. However, the large number of electrodes (>40), considerable set up time and costs in terms of ancillary data acquisition equipment of prior arrangements over-shadow any potential benefits. The accuracy of the present sensor system is not negatively affected by local variations in thickness and conductivity, nor is it as sensitive to noise in the original data, verses the known prior art. In particular, the normal E-field is the direct output of a measurement so as to be less affected by these practical effects and is highly sensitive. Further, the addition of a measurement of the normal E-field to an existing surface potential measurement results in reduced artifacts related to the position of the reference electrode used with a conventional surface measurement. Reference artifacts occur in conventional EEG because: (a) the locations of brain sources are generally not known so one cannot reliably place a reference electrode that is electrically “far” from all sources, and (b) sources of EEG are typically distributed throughout large regions of neocortex and distant sources can make large contributions to local potentials if they are electrically close as a result of shunting by lower resistance paths. Taking the difference between two electrodes arranged at well defined spaced positions along an axis, orthogonal or otherwise, outside the body greatly reduces reference artifacts, leading to improved interpretation of brain electrical sources.
It should be understood that these benefits for EEG are also applicable to other medical applications, such as imaging of the heart or localization and discrimination of multiple electrical sources within the body. Furthermore, the benefits of a multi-axis E-field measurement can be expected to impact other applications, such as surveillance and geophysics. To this end, the sensor system of the present invention can also incorporate one or more magnetic sensors for simultaneously or individually sensing magnetic field data. In particular, the measurement of the field in the direction perpendicular to the ground can provide information about sources under the ground in an analogous manner to applications in the human body.
Although described with reference to preferred embodiments of the invention, it should be readily understood that various changes and/or modifications can be made to the invention without departing from the spirit thereof. One example is measuring an electric field normal to a human body and combining this data with measurements made on the surface of the skin to provide additional information about electrical activity and electrical properties of the heart, brain, and other organs. In general, the invention is only intended to be limited by the scope of the following claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/509,423 entitled “Integrated Electric and Magnetic Field Sensor” filed Oct. 7, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3500823 | Richardson et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3565060 | Sipple | Feb 1971 | A |
3620208 | Higley et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3715660 | Ruhnke | Feb 1973 | A |
3722677 | Lehnert | Mar 1973 | A |
3744482 | Kaufman et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3815000 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3880146 | Everett et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3882846 | Fletcher et al. | May 1975 | A |
3923042 | Hajdu et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3986109 | Poduje | Oct 1976 | A |
4023408 | Ryan et al. | May 1977 | A |
4248244 | Charnitski et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4277751 | Lawson et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4346384 | Raab | Aug 1982 | A |
4419622 | Cuneo, Jr. et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4478223 | Allor | Oct 1984 | A |
4569357 | Sanz et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4580576 | Blackwood | Apr 1986 | A |
4581821 | Cahalan et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4588993 | Babij et al. | May 1986 | A |
4593702 | Kepski et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4602639 | Hoogendoorn et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4669479 | Dunseath, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4688141 | Bernard et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4733242 | de Rose | Mar 1988 | A |
4785237 | Cox | Nov 1988 | A |
4801866 | Wixley | Jan 1989 | A |
4806851 | Krider et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4850370 | Dower | Jul 1989 | A |
4873483 | Ostrander | Oct 1989 | A |
5001594 | Bobbio | Mar 1991 | A |
5015906 | Cho et al. | May 1991 | A |
5036334 | Henderson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5039312 | Hollis, Jr. et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5090643 | Spears | Feb 1992 | A |
5119404 | Aihara | Jun 1992 | A |
5184215 | Barker | Feb 1993 | A |
5191891 | Righter | Mar 1993 | A |
5229593 | Cato | Jul 1993 | A |
5289822 | Highe et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5304941 | Tateishi | Apr 1994 | A |
5315232 | Stewart | May 1994 | A |
5325073 | Hasegawa | Jun 1994 | A |
5336999 | Mansfield et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5458116 | Egler | Oct 1995 | A |
5485092 | Fortin | Jan 1996 | A |
5488677 | Tokano | Jan 1996 | A |
5574805 | Toba et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5632280 | Leyde et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645527 | Beck | Jul 1997 | A |
5646525 | Gilboa | Jul 1997 | A |
5650750 | Leyde et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5670870 | Muramatsu | Sep 1997 | A |
5699015 | Dotson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5734296 | Dotson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5751192 | Main | May 1998 | A |
5781003 | Kondo | Jul 1998 | A |
5795293 | Carim et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798673 | Griffith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5896035 | Takahashi | Apr 1999 | A |
5947920 | Beck | Sep 1999 | A |
6052615 | Feild et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6096220 | Ohkawa | Aug 2000 | A |
6111466 | Mokhtar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134424 | Nishihori et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6215294 | Coleman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242911 | Maschek | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246367 | Markson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262631 | Li | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6411108 | Douglas et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438413 | Taheri | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6472888 | Oguma et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6551252 | Sackner et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597942 | Yonce | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611168 | Denison et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6674281 | Shieh | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686800 | Krupka | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721591 | Wei et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6754523 | Toole | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755795 | Marmaropoulos et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760615 | Ferek-Petric | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6791311 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807438 | Brun Del Re et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6842006 | Conti et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6861838 | Kawase | Mar 2005 | B1 |
20020038092 | Stanaland et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030036691 | Stanaland et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030214408 | Grajales et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224685 | Sharma | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231141 | Alden et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040070446 | Krupka | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073104 | Brun Del Re et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040254435 | Mathews et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2428250 | Nov 2003 | CA |
2353594 | Feb 2001 | GB |
03048789 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03079897 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050073322 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60509423 | Oct 2003 | US |