Separating carbon dioxide and ethane from a mixed stream

Abstract
Embodiments described herein provide methods and systems for separating a mixed ethane and CO2. A method described includes generating a liquid stream including ethane and CO2. The liquid stream is flashed to form an ethane vapor stream and solid CO2. The solid CO2 is accumulated in an accumulation vessel and the gas is removed from the top of the accumulation vessel.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present application is directed to the separation of carbon dioxide from ethane, wherein the liquid acid gas stream is composed primarily of hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide.


BACKGROUND

Natural gas reservoirs may often contain high levels of acid gases, such as CO2. In these cases, a cryogenic process may provide an efficacious way to separate the acid gases from the methane. The cryogenic process could include a simple bulk fractionation, a Ryan-Holmes process, or a more complex cryogenic fractionation process. The cryogenic processes separate methane from CO2 by condensation and fractionation, and can produce the acid gas in a liquid phase for efficient disposal via pumping. However, in the cryogenic processes heavier hydrocarbons are separated with the CO2 in a single liquid stream. Often, the CO2 will be immediately reinjected for disposal, where the mixture will not cause any problems.


In some locations, a natural gas reservoir contains high levels of CO2. It is advantageous in these cases to use a cryogenic process to separate the CO2 from the methane. The cryogenic process could be simple bulk fractionation, a Ryan-Holmes, or a Controlled Freeze Zone (CFZ™) process. These processes separate methane from CO2 by condensation I fractionation, and can provide the CO2 as a liquid for efficient disposal. However, in these processes all hydrocarbons heavier than methane (C2+ or “ethane plus”) are also condensed and separated with the CO2. Normally, the CO2 will be reinjected for disposal, but the hydrocarbons are valuable and it is preferred that they be recovered for sale.


Separation of the heavier hydrocarbons can be performed by fractionation. However, ethane forms an azeotropic mixture with CO2, as discussed with respect to FIG. 1. The azeotropic prevents separation by normal techniques.



FIG. 1 is a temperature—composition phase plot 100 showing the equilibrium concentrations of CO2 in a mixture with ethane at 4,137 kilopascals (kPa, 600 psia). The x-axis 102 indicates the mole fraction of CO2, while the y-axis 104 represents the temperature in degrees Celsius (° C.). The concentration of the CO2 in the vapor phase 106 matches the concentration of the CO2 in the liquid phase 108 at about 70% CO2/30% ethane, as indicated by an arrow 110. This prevents separation-by-fractionation across the azeotrope (left to right, or right to left).



FIG. 2 is a temperature—composition phase plot 200 showing the equilibrium concentrations of CO2 in a mixture with ethane at 689.5 kPa (100 psia). Like numbered items are as described with respect to FIG. 1. As this plot 200 shows, concentration of the CO2 in the vapor phase 106 approaches the concentration of the CO2 in the liquid phase 108 at about 60% CO2/40% ethane, as indicated by an arrow 202. This prevents separation-by-fractionation across the azeotrope (left to right, or right to left). As these plots 100 and 200 indicate, complete separation by fractionation cannot be achieved without some additional separation processes.


Since the vapor and liquid compositions are equal at some point (70% CO2 at 4,137 kPa and 60% CO2 at 689.5 kPa), complete separation by fractionation cannot be achieved without some additional factor. Current practice for CO2 I ethane separation includes various methods. For example, a heavy component (lean oil) can be added, which preferentially absorbs the ethane. This is called “extractive distillation.” As another example, two-pressure fractionation can be used to exploit the small difference in the azeotropic composition between different pressures, for example, using two fractionators to fractionate at both 4,137 kPa and 689.5 kPa. This requires very large recycle stream, large fractionation systems, and is very energy intensive. Methods to exploit other physical and chemical properties (not dependent on vapor-liquid equilibria) can be used in conjunction with fractionation to achieve separation. These methods may include the use of amines in a chemical reaction with CO2, gas permeation membranes, or molecular sieves.


For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,246,015, to Styring, discloses a method for separating carbon dioxide and ethane based on washing ethane from frozen carbon dioxide. The separation is accomplished by freezing the carbon dioxide in a carbon dioxide and ethane mixture and washing the ethane from the solid carbon dioxide with a liquid hydrocarbon having at least three carbon atoms. The freezing process may be preceded by distillation of a carbon dioxide-ethane mixture to form an azeotropic mixture. A subsequent distillation may be used to separate the wash hydrocarbon from the carbon dioxide. In addition, if desired, the ethane-wash hydrocarbon mixture may be similarly separated in a subsequent distillation stage.


U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0189443, by McGuire, discloses a method of removing carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide from a high pressure mixture with methane. The high pressure gas is expanded through a flow channel having a convergent section followed by a divergent section with an intervening throat which functions as an aerodynamic expander. The flow channel is operated at temperatures low enough to result in the formation of solid carbon dioxide and solid hydrogen sulfide particles, which increases the efficiency of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide removal.


International Patent Publication No. WO/2008/095258, by Hart, discloses a method for decreasing the concentration on carbon dioxide in a natural gas feed stream containing ethane and C3+ hydrocarbons. The process involves cooling the natural gas feed stream under a first set of conditions to produce a liquid stream of carbon dioxide, ethane and C3+ hydrocarbons and a gas stream having a reduced carbon dioxide concentration. The liquid stream is separated from the gas stream, and C3+ hydrocarbons may be separated from the liquid stream. The gas stream is then cooled under a second set of conditions to produce a sweetened natural gas stream and a second liquid containing liquid carbon dioxide and/or carbon dioxide solids. The sweetened natural gas stream is separated from the second liquid.


International Patent Publication No. WO/2008/084945, by Prast, discloses a method and assembly for removing and solidifying carbon dioxide from a fluid stream. The assembly has a cyclonic fluid separator with a tubular throat portion arranged between a converging fluid inlet section and a diverging fluid outlet section and a swirl creating device. The separation vessel has a tubular section positioned on and in connection with a collecting tank. A fluid stream with carbon dioxide is injected into the separation assembly. A swirling motion is imparted to the fluid stream so as to induce outward movement. The swirling fluid stream is then expanded such that components of carbon dioxide in a meta-stable state within the fluid stream are formed. Subsequently, the outward fluid stream with the components of carbon dioxide is extracted from the cyclonic fluid separator and provided as a mixture to the separation vessel. The mixture is then guided through the tubular section towards the collecting tank, while providing processing conditions such that solid carbon dioxide is formed. Finally, solidified carbon dioxide is extracted.


Each of these methods presents a drawback. For example, using a lean oil contaminates the ethane, and requires large amounts of heat, for regenerating the lean oil. Further, large lean oil circulation rates are needed and the technique does not allow complete ethane recovery. Two-pressure fractionation systems require very large recycle streams and equipment sizes, increasing costs. Techniques that use amines, membranes, and mole sieves all release the CO2 as a vapor at low pressure, increasing the cost of disposal. Finally, the expander separation devices generate the CO2 as a solid. Thus, there is a need for a better method of separating CO2 and ethane.


SUMMARY

An embodiment described herein provides a method for separating a mixed ethane and CO2 stream. The method includes generating a liquid stream comprising ethane and CO2 and passing the liquid stream through a flash valve into an accumulation vessel, forming a gas that is enhanced in ethane, and forming solid CO2. The solid CO2 is accumulated in the accumulation vessel, and the gas is removed from the top of the accumulation vessel.


Another embodiment provides a system for separating a mixed stream of CO2 and ethane. The system includes a flash valve configured to isoenthalpically flash the mixed stream forming solid CO2 and a vapor stream enhanced in ethane, and an accumulation vessel configured to capture the solid CO2.


Another embodiment provides a method for purifying a natural gas stream. The method includes dehydrating the natural gas stream and cryogenically separating the natural gas stream into a methane rich fraction, a natural gas liquids fraction, and an azeotropic stream in a cryogenic purification system. The azeotropic stream is flashed to form solid CO2 and an ethane enriched vapor stream. The solid CO2 is removed from the ethane enriched vapor stream in an accumulation vessel and the ethane enriched vapor stream is purified to form a liquid ethane product.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The advantages of the present techniques are better understood by referring to the following detailed description and the attached drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a temperature—composition phase plot showing the equilibrium concentrations of CO2 in a mixture with ethane at 4,137 kPa;



FIG. 2 is a temperature—composition phase plot showing the equilibrium concentrations of CO2 in a mixture with ethane at 689.5 kPa;



FIG. 3 is a plot of the freezing conditions used to form solid CO2 in a mixture with a hydrocarbon;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system that can be used to separate CO2 and ethane as part of a natural gas purification process;



FIG. 5 is a simplified process flow diagram of a cryogenic separation system that can be used to generate an azeotropic stream;



FIG. 6 is a simplified process diagram of a separation system for separating CO2 from an azeotropic mixture with ethane; and



FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a method for generating a CO2 product stream and an ethane stream from an azeotropic stream using a flashing process.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description section, specific embodiments of the present techniques are described. However, to the extent that the following description is specific to a particular embodiment or a particular use of the present techniques, this is intended to be for exemplary purposes only and simply provides a description of the exemplary embodiments. Accordingly, the techniques are not limited to the specific embodiments described below, but rather, include all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents falling within the true spirit and scope of the appended claims.


At the outset, for ease of reference, certain terms used in this application and their meanings as used in this context are set forth. To the extent a term used herein is not defined below, it should be given the broadest definition persons in the pertinent art have given that term as reflected in at least one printed publication or issued patent. Further, the present techniques are not limited by the usage of the terms shown below, as all equivalents, synonyms, new developments, and terms or techniques that serve the same or a similar purpose are considered to be within the scope of the present claims.


“Acid gases” are contaminants that are often encountered in natural gas streams. Typically, these gases include carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S), although any number of other contaminants may also form acids. Acid gases are commonly removed by contacting the gas stream with an absorbent, such as an amine, which may react with the acid gas. When the absorbent becomes acid-gas “rich,” a desorption step can be used to separate the acid gases from the absorbent. The “lean” absorbent is then typically recycled for further absorption. As used herein a “liquid acid gas stream” is a stream of acid gases that are condensed into the liquid phase, for example, including CO2 dissolved in H2S and vice-versa.


An “azeotrope” or “azeotropic mixture” is a system of two or more components in which the liquid composition and vapor composition are equal at a certain pressure and temperature. In practice, this means that the components of an azeotropic mixture are constant-boiling at that pressure and temperature and generally cannot be separated during a phase change.


As used herein, a “column” is a separation vessel in which a counter current flow is used to isolate materials on the basis of differing properties. In an absorbent column, a physical solvent is injected into the top, while a mixture of gases to be separated is flowed through the bottom. As the gases flow upwards through the falling stream of absorbent, one gas species is preferentially absorbed, lowering its concentration in the vapor stream exiting the top of the column. In a fractionation column, liquid and vapor phases are counter-currently contacted to effect separation of a fluid mixture based on boiling points or vapor pressure differences. The high vapor pressure, or lower boiling, component will tend to concentrate in the vapor phase whereas the low vapor pressure, or higher boiling, component will tend to concentrate in the liquid phase.


“Cold box” refers to an insulated enclosure which encompasses sets of process equipment such as heat exchangers, columns, and phase separators. Such sets of process equipment may form the whole or part of a given process.


“Compressor” refers to a device for compressing a working gas, including gas-vapor mixtures or exhaust gases. Compressors can include pumps, compressor turbines, reciprocating compressors, piston compressors, rotary vane or screw compressors, and devices and combinations capable of compressing a working gas.


“Cryogenic distillation” has been used to separate carbon dioxide from methane since the relative volatility between methane and carbon dioxide is reasonably high. The overhead vapor is enriched with methane and the bottoms product is enriched with carbon dioxide and other heavier hydrocarbons. Cryogenic distillation processing requires the proper combination of pressure and temperature to achieve the desired product recovery.


The term “gas” is used interchangeably with “vapor,” and means a substance or mixture of substances in the gaseous state as distinguished from the liquid or solid state. Likewise, the term “liquid” means a substance or mixture of substances in the liquid state as distinguished from the gas or solid state.


“Heat exchanger” refers to any equipment arrangement adapted to allow the passage of heat energy from one or more streams to other streams. The heat exchange may be either direct (e.g., with the streams in direct contact) or indirect (e.g. with the streams separated by a mechanical barrier). The streams exchanging heat energy may be one or more lines of refrigerant, heating, or cooling utilities, one or more feed streams, or one or more product streams. Examples include a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, a cryogenic spool-wound heat exchanger, or a brazed aluminum-plate fin type, among others.


A “hydrocarbon” is an organic compound that primarily includes the elements hydrogen and carbon, although nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen, metals, or any number of other elements may be present in small amounts. As used herein, hydrocarbons generally refer to organic materials that are harvested from hydrocarbon containing sub-surface rock layers, termed reservoirs. For example, natural gas is normally composed primarily of the hydrocarbon methane.


The term “natural gas” refers to a multi-component gas obtained from a crude oil well (associated gas) or from a subterranean gas-bearing formation (non-associated gas). The composition and pressure of natural gas can vary significantly. A typical natural gas stream contains methane (C1) as a significant component. Raw natural gas will also typically contain ethane (C2), higher molecular weight hydrocarbons, one or more acid gases (such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide, carbon disulfide, and mercaptans), and minor amounts of contaminants such as water, helium, nitrogen, iron sulfide, wax, and crude oil.


“Pressure” is the force exerted per unit area by the gas on the walls of the volume. Pressure can be shown as pounds per square inch (psi). “Atmospheric pressure” refers to the local pressure of the air. “Absolute pressure” (psia) refers to the sum of the atmospheric pressure (14.7 psia at standard conditions) plus the gauge pressure (psig). “Gauge pressure” (psig) refers to the pressure measured by a gauge, which indicates only the pressure exceeding the local atmospheric pressure (i.e., a gauge pressure of 0 psig corresponds to an absolute pressure of 14.7 psia). The term “vapor pressure” has the usual thermodynamic meaning. For a pure component in an enclosed system at a given pressure, the component vapor pressure is essentially equal to the total pressure in the system.


A “separation vessel” is a vessel wherein an incoming feed is separated into individual vapor and liquid fractions. A separation vessel may include a flash drum in which a stream is flashed to form vapor and liquid components. The vapor component is removed from an upper outlet, while the liquid component is removed from a lower outlet.


“Substantial” when used in reference to a quantity or amount of a material, or a specific characteristic thereof, refers to an amount that is sufficient to provide an effect that the material or characteristic was intended to provide. The exact degree of deviation allowable may in some cases depend on the specific context.


Overview


Methods and systems described herein use the heat of vaporization of ethane to freeze entrained CO2 to a solid form, allowing a substantially complete separation of the components. The process works by taking a liquid mixture of CO2 and ethane, chilling it as much as possible without forming solid CO2, and, then, reducing the mixture's pressure by flashing it into a solids-accumulation vessel. The pressure of the flash is selected to vaporize all the ethane by heat liberated from the freezing CO2 (heat of fusion). Solid CO2 deposits in the vessel, while the vapor stream, now enriched in ethane above the azeotrope, can be distilled by using conventional fractionation for partial ethane recovery. The distillation overhead stream (at the azeotropic composition again) is chilled and recycled back to the feed, as liquid CO2 I Ethane. The process may be further understood with respect to FIG. 3.



FIG. 3 is a plot 300 of the freezing conditions used to form solid CO2 in a mixture with a hydrocarbon. In the plot 300, the x-axis 302 represents the temperature of the mixture in degrees Fahrenheit, while the y-axis 304 represents the CO2 content of the liquid phase in mol %. The line 306 on the plot 300 represents a division between a first region 308 in which solid CO2 forms, and a second region 310 in which solid CO2 does not form. At temperatures of about −62° C., solid CO2 forms from a 70% 130%: CO2 I ethane mixture as shown at point 312 in the plot 300. Ethane, however, does not freeze, but will be either a vapor or liquid, depending on the pressure, temperature, and residual CO2 level. The solid will be nearly pure CO2, resulting in a separation.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a system 400 that can be used to isolate a CO2 product stream 402 as part of a natural gas purification process. The purified natural gas 404 may, for example, be used to power an electrical generation system 406. The system 400 is not limited to the blocks shown, but may include any number of configurations, including, for example, providing a purified natural gas stream 404 to other customers through a commercial pipeline.


In the system 400, one or more production wells 407 can be used to produce a raw natural gas stream 408. The raw natural gas stream 408 may include a substantial amount of carbon dioxide, ethane, and other components. In some embodiments, the raw natural gas stream 408 may have a low-BTU content, e.g., between about 500 and 950 BTUs per standard cubic foot.


The raw natural gas stream 408 can be fed to a dehydration unit 410 in which water vapor may be removed using glycol dehydration, desiccants, or a Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) unit, among other processes. The dehydration unit 410 is not limited to the arrangement shown, but may be included at any number of points in the system 400, or eliminated if not needed. Generally, dehydration is used to prepare the natural gas for cryogenic separation by removing water, which could freeze and plug the systems.


The dehydrated stream 412 may be fed to a purification system 414, which may use any number of processes to remove contaminates, including natural gas liquids (NGL) 416, carbon dioxide, and other acid gases. The purification system 414 may include a cryogenic distillation unit, for example, using a Ryan-Holmes process. Other cryogenic distillation techniques may be used, such as the controlled freeze zone (CFZ™) technology available from Exxon Mobil. Both of these cryogenic processes can generate an azeotropic stream 418 that includes ethane and CO2, as well as other compounds. In various embodiments, any number of other techniques that generate a liquid acid gas stream may also be used for purification, such as a warm gas processing system. In addition to removing the azeotropic stream 418, the purification system 414 may also remove at least a portion of the higher carbon number hydrocarbons, e.g., C2 and higher, for example, by fractionation. The higher carbon number hydrocarbons may be combined to form a NGL stream 416, among others, which may also be marketed as a product. However, as discussed above, the formation of the azeotrope will cause a portion of ethane will remain in the azeotropic stream 418 as a mixture with the CO2.


The azeotropic stream 418 from the purification may be further processed to generate the CO2 stream 402, which may be used for enhanced oil recovery, commercial sales, or other purposes. The processing is performed in a separation system 420 that flashes the azeotropic stream 418 to generate an ethane stream 422, which can be combined back into the natural gas liquids 416 or added to the gas stream 404.


After purification, the gas stream 404 may be a mixture of methane and various inert gases, such as nitrogen and helium, and may include the ethane stream 422. This gas stream 404 can be directly used, for example, as a low BTU natural gas stream to power an electric power generation system 406. Other operations, such as the separation of a helium enriched stream, may also be performed prior to the usage. An electrical generation plant 406 may provide other, higher value, products for sale, including electrical power 424 to a power grid, heat 426 for other processes, or both. In some embodiments, the electrical generation plant 406 may purchase the gas stream 404 from a pipeline associated with the producer. The techniques described herein are not limited to electric power generation using low BTU streams, but may be used with any purification process in which the separation of ethane from carbon dioxide may be useful.


The system 400 described herein has a number of advantages over current technologies. For example, it produces a liquid carbon dioxide stream for easy injection, while producing a clean vapor ethane stream for sale. Further, the system 400 integrates heat demands and cooling sources to decrease the need for external refrigeration in the separation system 420. The process is based on solidifying the CO2 and flashing the ethane. Since the azeotropic stream 418 is in the liquid phase, the vaporization of the azeotropic stream 418 can be used to drive the process, with the heat of vaporization of the ethane cooling the CO2, and the heat of solidification from the CO2 driving the vaporization of the ethane. Additional cooling or heating may be provided to balance the energy transfer.


The purification system 414 can include any number of processes that produce a liquid acid gas stream, including, for example, the Ryan-Holmes process, a bulk fractionation process, or a controlled freeze zone plant. The separation system 420 can be retrofitted onto an existing purification system 414 to have all or part of the liquid acid gas stream produced by these processes re-directed to the separation system 420 to extract higher value ethane from CO2 mixtures. One example of a cryogenic separation process that may be used is shown in FIG. 5.


Cryogenic Separation Forming a Liquid Acid Gas Stream



FIG. 5 is a simplified process flow diagram of a cryogenic separation system 500 that can be used to generate an azeotropic stream 502. In the separation system 500, a natural gas stream 504 can be cooled by providing some of the heat used by the process, for example, by being passed through a heat exchanger 506 to provide heat for reboiler service on a cryogenic fractionation column 508. The natural gas stream 504 can be further chilled in another heat exchanger 510, and then flashed into a flash drum 512. The bottoms stream 514 from the flash drum 512 can be sent into the cryogenic fractionation column 508. The vapor stream 516 from the overhead of the flash drum 512 can be further cooled in a cold box 518, for example, by exchanging heat with a number of refrigerant systems 520, such as high pressure, mid-pressure, and low pressure propane chillers. The resulting stream 522 is injected into the cryogenic fractionation column 508. In addition to heating from the heat exchanger 506 on the natural gas feed stream 504, a reboiler heat exchanger 524 may provide additional heating or cooling to the cryogenic fractionation column 508.


The overhead stream 526 from the cryogenic fractionation column 508 will include the methane from the natural gas feed 504, as well as other low boiling point or non-condensable gases, such as nitrogen and helium. Additional separation systems 528, including columns, cold boxes, and the like, may be used to generate a CH4 product stream 530 at a chosen purity level. A portion 530 of the overhead stream 526 may be fed to a pump 531 to be reinjected into the cryogenic fractionation column 508 as a reflux stream 534.


The bottoms stream 536 from the cryogenic fractionation column 508 can be separated into two streams. A reboiler stream 538 is heated and returned to the cryogenic fractionation column 508 to provide heating. An outlet stream 540 is removed from the bottoms stream 536 for disposal. In embodiments, this outlet stream 540 forms the azeotropic stream 502 used for the generation of the separated ethane and CO2 streams, as described with respect to FIG. 6.


Separation of CO2 from an Azeotropic Stream



FIG. 6 is a simplified process diagram of a separation system 600 for separating CO2 from an azeotropic mixture with ethane. Tables 1 and 2 provide details of a simulation example of the process. The numbers in the diamonds in FIG. 6 correspond to the like numbered columns in Table 1, which show the properties and compositions of the labeled point. The separation system 600 shown in FIG. 6 has a number of advantages over conventional technology. For example, the ethane and CO2 can be substantially separated, with minimal residual contamination or hydrocarbon loss. The CO2 stream 602 is recovered as a pressurized liquid, allowing it to be pumped to disposal pressure. This facilitates EOR or geo-sequestration at minimum power. The ethane stream 604 is recovered as a chilled liquid, and can be either heated and revaporized to provide refrigeration for the process, or processed to a liquid ethane product by further chilling.


The separation system 600 can be substantially heat-integrated, minimizing external heat or power requirements. A separation of a methane stream 606 from the ethane stream 604 is performed at the same time as the separation of ethane and CO2. This separation eliminates a need for an additional demethanizer downstream. The methane stream 606 is returned to the CFZ or bulk fractionation column, for example, being combined with the natural gas stream 504 discussed with respect to FIG. 5.


The separation system 600 begins when the azeotropic stream 502 is blended with a liquids stream 608 from a methane separator 610. The mixing element 611 can be a static mixer, or merely a pipe joint coupling the two streams 502 and 608. In this example, the CO2 content of the azeotropic stream 502 is about 70%, which is very close to the azeotropic composition at 4,137 kPa (600 psia). In embodiments in which the CO2 content is lower, the azeotropic stream 502 can be directed to the ethane fractionator 612, e.g., mixed with the fractionator feed stream 614, to remove as much ethane as possible by conventional fractionation, prior to solid CO2 formation. In embodiments in which the CO2 content of the azeotropic stream 502 is greater than 70%, another fractionator could be included upstream of the separation system 600 to generate the azeotropic stream 502 as an overhead product by removing as much CO2 as possible prior to using the subject technology. In both cases, the final concentration of the CO2 and ethane in the azeotropic stream 502 after separation is limited by the azeotrope, e.g., to around 70% CO2 and 30% ethane at 4,137 kPa (600 psia).


From the mixing element 611, a combined feed stream 616 is passed through an isoenthalpic expansion element 618, such as a Joule-Thompson valve. The expanded stream 620 is chilled as a result of the flashing, causing the CO2 to solidify as the ethane and some CO2 vaporizes. The expanded stream 620 is passed into one of two solid accumulation vessels 622 or 624. In this example, the inlet valve 626 to and outlet valve 628 from the first solid accumulation vessel 630 are open, allowing the CO2 solids to be captured in the vessel, while the ethane rich vapor stream 632 exits from the top of the vessel.


The ethane rich vapor stream 632 is compressed in a raw ethane compressor 634. The compressed feed stream 636 is cooled in an ethane fractionator feed cooler 638 to form the fractionator feed stream 614. The fractionator feed stream 614 is injected into a column 640 in the ethane fractionator 612. A bottom stream 642 from the column 640 is heated in a reboiler 644, before being returned to the column 640 as a heated stream 646. A portion of the bottom stream 642 is taken from the reboiler 644 as the ethane stream 604.


The overhead stream 648 from the column 640 is sent to a reflux condenser and reflux accumulator tank 650. A liquid stream is taken from the bottom of the reflux accumulator tank 650 and injected into the top of the column 640 as a reflux stream 652. The vapor stream from the top of reflux accumulator tank 650 is removed as a CO2/ethane recycle stream 654. The CO2/ethane recycle stream 654 is chilled in a recycle condenser 656, forming a liquid recycle stream 658. The liquid recycle stream 658 is flashed in the methane separator 610. As discussed, the liquid stream 608 from the methane separator 610 is combined with the azeotropic mixture 502. The gas from the top of the methane separator 610 forms the methane stream 606, which can be returned to the cryogenic separation process.









TABLE 1





Example Process Data























1
2
3
4
5
7
8





Temperature - Deg C.
−62
−91
−52
15
−62
−62
−62


Pressure - kPa
689.5
151.7
779.1
848.1
689.5
689.5
689.5


Flowrate (kgmole/hr)
453.7
614.8
313.3
313.3
161.1
614.8
185.3


Flowrate (k SM3/D)
257.7
349.0
177.9
177.9
91.4
349.0
105.2


Methane Mole
0.01000
0.01203
0.02362
0.02362
0.01776
0.01203
0.03995


Fraction


Ethane Mole Fraction
0.30000
0.32877
0.64518
0.64518
0.40980
0.32877
0.40000


CO2 Mole Fraction
0.69000
0.65919
0.33121
0.33121
0.57243
0.65919
0.56005

















9
10
11
12
13
14





Temperature - Deg C.
−62
−55
−87
−87
8
−39


Pressure - kPa
689.5
758.5
151.7
151.7
4240.4
792.9


Flowrate (kgmole/hr)
24.2
185.3
313.3
301.5
301.5
128.1


Flowrate (k SM3/D)
13.9
105.2
177.9
171.1
171.1
72.7


Methane Mole
0.18739
0.03995
0.02362
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000


Fraction


Ethane Mole
0.33493
0.40000
0.64518
0.00000
0.00000
0.99978


Fraction


CO2 Mole Fraction
0.47768
0.56005
0.33121
1.00000
1.00000
0.00022









During operations, the first solid accumulation vessel 622 fills with solid CO2. When enough solid CO2 has accumulated in the first solid accumulation vessel 630, the flashing liquid can be sent to a second solid accumulation vessel 624 by opening the inlet valve 660 and outlet valve 662 on the second solid accumulation vessel 624 and closing the inlet valve 626 to vessel 622. The first solid accumulation vessel 622 can be heated by an internal heating coil 664, sublimating some CO2 to displace any remaining hydrocarbons. Once the hydrocarbons are displaced, the outlet valve 628 on the first solid accumulation vessel 622 can then be closed, allowing the pressure to rise until the CO2 can melt, forming liquid CO2. When the CO2 has finished melting, the drainage valve 666 at the bottom of the first solid accumulation vessel 622 can be opened to allow the CO2 stream 602 to be drained for sales or disposal. Once the second solid accumulation vessel 624 has a sufficient amount of CO2, the process can be repeated. After hydrocarbons are purged, the vessel is isolated, and the CO2 is melted, a drainage valve 668 can be opened to drain the CO2 stream 602 from the second solid accumulation vessel 624.


The energy balance of the process is shown in Table 2. The numbers in column 2 correspond to the circled numbers in FIG. 6. As can be seen from the values, the total heat released by the process is 2 MW, while the total heat adsorbed by the process is 2.21 MW, for a net heat input of 0.21 mW. At least a portion of that heat may be provided by cooling the initial natural gas feed 504 to the cryogenic separation process. In addition to the 352 kW used to power the raw ethane compressor 634, other energy may be required to provide refrigeration make-up.









TABLE 2





Heat Balance



















Heat Sources:
1
Recycle Condenser Q
595
kW



2
Ethane Splitter Cond Q
595
kW



3
Splitter Feed Cooler Q
811
kW




TOTAL:
2
MW


Heat Sinks:
4
Ethane Splitter Reboiler Q
709
kW



5
CO2 Sensible Heating Q
741
kW



6
CO2 Heat of Fusion Q
762
kW




TOTAL:
2.21
MW


Power Requirements:
7
Raw Ethane Compressor
352
kW









Method for Separating CO2 and Ethane



FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a method 700 for generating a CO2 product stream and an ethane stream from an azeotropic stream using a flashing process. The method 700 begins at block 702 with the separation of an azeotropic stream from a natural gas product. The azeotropic stream may be isolated using a cryogenic separation process as described with respect to FIG. 4. However, any separation process that generates an azeotropic stream may be used. If the azeotropic stream is generated as a gas, a chilling and condensation step can be added to condense the gas prior to separation. At block 704, the azeotropic stream is flowed through a flash valve into a flash vessel to solidify CO2 and flash ethane, as described with respect to FIG. 6. At block 706, the solidified CO2 is allowed to accumulate in the flash vessel. At block 708, a determination is made as to whether the flash vessel is full. If so, at block 710, accumulation of the solid CO2 is switched to an empty flash vessel that had been on standby. Process flow with the new flash vessel returns to block 704 to continue with the flashing, as indicated by an arrow 712.


The process continues for the full flash vessel at block 714, where heat is added to sublime a small portion of the CO2, e.g., about less than about 5%, to release any trapped hydrocarbons. After the sublimation, at block 716, the vessel is blocked in and the temperature and pressure are allowed to rise until the CO2 melts. The vessel is drained and the liquid CO2 is provided as a product at block 718. The empty flash vessel is then placed in standby at block 720, and process flow for the empty vessel returns to block 710 to wait for the current accumulation vessel to fill, as indicated by an arrow 722.


The ethane that is flashed off to create the solid CO2 at block 706 is combined with the sublimed CO2 and hydrocarbon from block 714, as indicated by arrows 724. At block 726, the combined stream is compressed and chilled to form a raw liquid ethane stream. At block 728, the raw liquid ethane stream is stripped to remove a contaminated stream that contains methane and CO2 from the ethane. The purified ethane stream is provided as a product at block 730. Methane is separated from the contaminated stream as a gas at block 732, and, at block 734. The remaining material, which includes ethane and CO2, is returned to block 704 to be combined with the azeotropic stream for flashing in the flash vessel, as indicated by an arrow 736.


Embodiments


Embodiments as described herein may include any combinations of the elements in the following numbered paragraphs:


1. A method for separating a mixed ethane and CO2 stream, including:

    • generating a liquid stream including ethane and CO2;
    • passing the liquid stream through a flash valve into an accumulation vessel, forming a gas that is enhanced in ethane, and forming solid CO2;
    • accumulating the solid CO2 in the accumulation vessel; and
    • removing the gas from the top of the accumulation vessel.


2. The method of paragraph 1, including cryogenically separating the liquid stream from a natural gas feed stream.


3. The method of paragraphs 1 or 2, including switching to a second accumulation vessel when the accumulation vessel is substantially filled with solid CO2.


4. The method of paragraph 3, including heating the solid CO2 in the accumulation vessel to sublime a fraction of the CO2, removing at least a portion of hydrocarbons trapped in the solid CO2.


5. The method of paragraphs 1, 2, or 3, including

    • blocking in the accumulation vessel;
    • heating the accumulation vessel; and
    • and allowing the temperature and pressure to rise in the accumulation vessel until the CO2 melts and forms liquid CO2.


6. The method of paragraph 5, including:

    • draining the liquid CO2 from the accumulation vessel; and
    • providing the liquid CO2 as a product stream.


7. The method of any of paragraphs 1-3, or 5, including:

    • condensing the ethane stream;
    • stripping the ethane stream to remove a contaminated ethane stream that includes methane and CO2;
    • separating methane from the contaminated ethane stream; and
    • combining the contaminated ethane stream with the liquid stream.


8. The method of paragraph 7, including returning the methane to a separate purification unit.


9. The method of any of paragraphs 1-3, 5, or 7, including fractionating the liquid stream prior the flash valve to remove excess CO2 and form an azeotropic mixture.


10. The method any of paragraphs 1-3, 5, 7, or 9, including fractionating the liquid stream prior to the flash valve to remove excess ethane and form an azeotropic mixture.


11. A system for separating a mixed stream of CO2 and ethane, including:

    • a flash valve configured to isoenthalpically flash the mixed stream forming solid CO2 and a vapor stream enhanced in ethane; and
    • an accumulation vessel configured to capture the solid CO2.


12. The system of paragraph 11, including a cryogenic separation system configured to form the mixed stream from a natural gas feed.


13. The system of paragraphs 11 or 12, including a compressor and a chiller configured to recondense the vapor stream forming a raw ethane stream.


14. The system of paragraph 13, including a fractionator configured to separate a contaminated ethane stream including ethane and CO2 from the raw ethane stream.


15. The system of paragraph 14, wherein the fractionator is configured to isolate a liquid ethane product stream.


16. The system of paragraph 14, including a flash vessel configured to separate methane from the contaminated ethane stream.


17. The system of any of paragraphs 11-13, including a plurality of accumulation vessels, wherein each sequential accumulation vessel is configured to begin accumulating solid CO2 when a previous accumulation vessel is substantially filled with CO2.


18. The system of any of paragraphs 11-13, or 17, including a heater configured to warm solid CO2 in the accumulation vessel and drive off trapped hydrocarbon.


19. The system of any of paragraphs 11-13, 17, or 18, wherein the accumulation vessel is configured to reach a temperature and pressure that allows the solid CO2 to melt, forming a liquid CO2 product stream.


20. The system of any of paragraphs 11-13, or 17-19, wherein the accumulation vessel is configured to form liquid CO2 from the solid CO2.


21. A method for purifying a natural gas stream including:

    • dehydrating the natural gas stream;
    • cryogenically separating the natural gas stream into a methane rich fraction, a natural gas liquids fraction, and an azeotropic stream in a cryogenic purification system;
    • flashing the azeotropic stream to form solid CO2 and an ethane enriched vapor stream;
    • removing the solid CO2 from the ethane enriched vapor stream in an accumulation vessel; and
    • purifying the ethane enriched vapor stream to form a liquid ethane product.


22. The method of paragraph 21, including:

    • separating a recycle stream including CO2, ethane, and methane from the ethane enriched vapor stream;
    • separating a methane stream from the recycle stream; and
    • returning the methane stream to the cryogenic purification system.


While the present techniques may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, the exemplary embodiments discussed above have been shown only by way of example. However, it should again be understood that the techniques is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed herein. Indeed, the present techniques include all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents falling within the true spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for separating a mixed stream of CO2 and ethane, comprising: a purification system configured to remove contaminants from the mixed stream and generate a liquid stream comprising an azeotropic mixture of ethane and CO2;a flash valve configured to isoenthalpically flash the liquid stream forming solid CO2 and a vapor stream enhanced in ethane; andan accumulation vessel configured to capture the solid CO2;a compressor and a chiller configured to recondense the vapor stream forming a condensed gas;a fractionator configured to remove a contaminated ethane stream, comprising ethane, methane, and CO2, from the condensed gas;a flash vessel configured to separate methane from the contaminated ethane stream, thereby forming a remainder stream that comprises ethane and CO2, wherein the remainder stream is combined with the liquid stream;wherein the accumulation vessel has an outlet valve and a heater, the heater configured to warm the solid CO2 in the accumulation vessel and drive off trapped hydrocarbon therein when the outlet valve is open, andmelt the solid CO2 in the accumulation vessel when the outlet valve is closed, thereby forming a liquid CO2 product stream.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, comprising a separation system configured to form the mixed stream from a natural gas feed.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the fractionator is configured to isolate a liquid ethane product stream.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the accumulation vessel is one of a plurality of sequentially arranged accumulation vessels, and wherein each sequential accumulation vessel is configured to begin accumulating solid CO2 when a previous accumulation vessel is filled with CO2.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the accumulation vessel is configured to reach a temperature and pressure that allows the solid CO2 to melt, forming a liquid CO2 product stream.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/376,359 filed on Aug. 1, 2014, which is the National Stage entry under 35 U.S.C. 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2013/029927 that published as WO2013/142100 and was filed on Mar. 8, 2013, which claims the benefit of and priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/613,606, filed on Mar. 21, 2012, each of which is incorporated by reference, in its entirety, for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (219)
Number Name Date Kind
2327134 Schuftan Aug 1943 A
2621216 White Dec 1952 A
2843219 Habgood Jul 1958 A
2863527 Herbert Dec 1958 A
2960837 Swenson et al. Nov 1960 A
3050950 Karwat et al. Aug 1962 A
3109726 Karwat Nov 1963 A
3349571 Nebgen Oct 1967 A
3393527 Swensen et al. Jul 1968 A
3400512 McKay Sep 1968 A
3421984 Jensen et al. Jan 1969 A
3683634 Streich Aug 1972 A
3705625 Whitten et al. Dec 1972 A
3767766 Tjoa et al. Oct 1973 A
3824080 Smith et al. Jul 1974 A
3842615 Reigel et al. Oct 1974 A
3848427 Loofbourow Nov 1974 A
3895101 Tsuruta Jul 1975 A
3929635 Burks et al. Dec 1975 A
3933001 Muska Jan 1976 A
4246015 Styring Jan 1981 A
4270937 Adler Jun 1981 A
4280559 Best Jul 1981 A
4281518 Muller et al. Aug 1981 A
4318723 Holmes et al. Mar 1982 A
4319964 Katz et al. Mar 1982 A
4336233 Appl et al. Jun 1982 A
4344485 Butler Aug 1982 A
4351655 Styring, Jr. Sep 1982 A
4370156 Goddin et al. Jan 1983 A
4382912 Madgavkar et al. May 1983 A
4383841 Ryan et al. May 1983 A
4405585 Sartori et al. Sep 1983 A
4417449 Hegarty et al. Nov 1983 A
4417909 Weltmer Nov 1983 A
4421535 Mehra Dec 1983 A
4441900 Swallow Apr 1984 A
4459142 Goddin Jul 1984 A
4462814 Holmes et al. Jul 1984 A
4511382 Valencia et al. Apr 1985 A
4512782 Bauer et al. Apr 1985 A
4533372 Valencia et al. Aug 1985 A
4551158 Wagner et al. Nov 1985 A
4563202 Yao et al. Jan 1986 A
4592766 Kumman et al. Jun 1986 A
4602477 Lucadamo Jul 1986 A
4609388 Adler et al. Sep 1986 A
4636334 Skinner et al. Jan 1987 A
4695672 Bunting Sep 1987 A
4697642 Vogel Oct 1987 A
4710213 Sapper et al. Dec 1987 A
4717408 Hopewell Jan 1988 A
4720294 Lucadamo et al. Jan 1988 A
4747858 Gottier May 1988 A
4761167 Nicholas et al. Aug 1988 A
4762543 Pantermuehl et al. Aug 1988 A
4769054 Steigman Sep 1988 A
4822393 Markbreiter et al. Apr 1989 A
4831206 Zarchy May 1989 A
4923493 Valencia et al. May 1990 A
4927498 Rushmere May 1990 A
4935043 Blanc et al. Jun 1990 A
4954220 Rushmere Sep 1990 A
4972676 Sakai Nov 1990 A
4976849 Soldati Dec 1990 A
5011521 Gottier Apr 1991 A
5062270 Haut et al. Nov 1991 A
5120338 Potts et al. Jun 1992 A
5137550 Hegarty et al. Aug 1992 A
5152927 Rivers Oct 1992 A
5233837 Callahan Aug 1993 A
5240472 Sircar Aug 1993 A
5247087 Rivers Sep 1993 A
5265428 Valencia et al. Nov 1993 A
5335504 Durr et al. Aug 1994 A
5345771 Dinsmore Sep 1994 A
5567396 Perry et al. Oct 1996 A
5620144 Strock et al. Apr 1997 A
5643460 Marble et al. Jul 1997 A
5681360 Siwajaek et al. Oct 1997 A
5700311 Spencer Dec 1997 A
5720929 Minkkinen et al. Feb 1998 A
5819555 Engdahl Oct 1998 A
5820837 Marjanovich et al. Oct 1998 A
5899274 Frauenfeld et al. May 1999 A
5956971 Cole et al. Sep 1999 A
5964985 Wootten Oct 1999 A
5983663 Sterner Nov 1999 A
6053007 Victory et al. Apr 2000 A
6082133 Barclay et al. Jul 2000 A
6082373 Sakurai et al. Jul 2000 A
6162262 Minkkinen et al. Dec 2000 A
6223557 Cole May 2001 B1
6240744 Agrawal et al. Jun 2001 B1
6267358 Gohara et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270557 Millet et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274112 Moffett et al. Aug 2001 B1
6336334 Minkkinen et al. Jan 2002 B1
6374634 Gallarda et al. Apr 2002 B2
6401486 Lee et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416729 DeBerry et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442969 Rojey et al. Sep 2002 B1
6500982 Hale et al. Dec 2002 B1
6505683 Minkkinen et al. Jan 2003 B2
6516631 Trebble Feb 2003 B1
6517801 Watson et al. Feb 2003 B2
6539747 Minta et al. Apr 2003 B2
6565629 Hayashida et al. May 2003 B1
6605138 Frondorf Aug 2003 B2
6631626 Hahn Oct 2003 B1
6632266 Thomas et al. Oct 2003 B2
6662872 Gutek et al. Dec 2003 B2
6708759 Leaute et al. Mar 2004 B2
6711914 Lecomte Mar 2004 B2
6735979 Lecomte et al. May 2004 B2
6755251 Thomas et al. Jun 2004 B2
6755965 Pironti et al. Jun 2004 B2
6818194 DeBerry et al. Nov 2004 B2
6946017 Leppin et al. Sep 2005 B2
6958111 Rust et al. Oct 2005 B2
6962061 Wilding et al. Nov 2005 B2
7001490 Wostbrock et al. Feb 2006 B2
7004985 Wallace et al. Feb 2006 B2
7066986 Haben et al. Jun 2006 B2
7073348 Clodic et al. Jul 2006 B2
7121115 Lemaire et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128150 Thomas et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128276 Nilsen et al. Oct 2006 B2
7152431 Amin et al. Dec 2006 B2
7211128 Thomas et al. May 2007 B2
7211701 Muller et al. May 2007 B2
7219512 Wilding et al. May 2007 B1
7285225 Copeland et al. Oct 2007 B2
7325415 Amin et al. Feb 2008 B2
7424808 Mak Sep 2008 B2
7437889 Roberts et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442231 Landrum Oct 2008 B2
7442233 Mitariten Oct 2008 B2
7493779 Amin Feb 2009 B2
7536873 Nohlen May 2009 B2
7550064 Bassler et al. Jun 2009 B2
7575624 Cartwright et al. Aug 2009 B2
7597746 Mak et al. Oct 2009 B2
7635408 Mak et al. Dec 2009 B2
7637984 Adamopoulos Dec 2009 B2
7637987 Mak Dec 2009 B2
7641717 Gal Jan 2010 B2
7662215 Sparling et al. Feb 2010 B2
7691239 Kister et al. Apr 2010 B2
7722289 Leone et al. May 2010 B2
7729976 Hill et al. Jun 2010 B2
7770872 Delatour Aug 2010 B2
7795483 Kulprathipanja et al. Sep 2010 B2
7806965 Stinson Oct 2010 B2
7814975 Hagen et al. Oct 2010 B2
7879135 Ravikumar Feb 2011 B2
7901583 McColl et al. Mar 2011 B2
7955496 Iqbal et al. Jun 2011 B2
8002498 Leone et al. Aug 2011 B2
8020408 Howard et al. Sep 2011 B2
8133764 Dirks et al. Mar 2012 B2
8303685 Schubert et al. Nov 2012 B2
8308849 Gal Nov 2012 B2
8312738 Singh et al. Nov 2012 B2
8372169 Tsangaris et al. Feb 2013 B2
8388832 Moffett et al. Mar 2013 B2
8428835 Habert et al. Apr 2013 B2
8475572 Prast et al. Jul 2013 B2
8529662 Kelley et al. Sep 2013 B2
20020174687 Cai Nov 2002 A1
20020189443 McGuire Dec 2002 A1
20030181772 Meyer et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040035148 Whitlock Feb 2004 A1
20060144079 Amin Jul 2006 A1
20060207946 McColl et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060239879 Lallemand et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070056317 Amin et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070144943 Lemaire et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070277674 Hirano et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080034789 Fieler et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080091316 Szczublewski Apr 2008 A1
20080092589 Trainer et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080307827 Hino et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090023605 Lebl et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090220406 Rahman Sep 2009 A1
20090266107 Singh et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100011809 Mak Jan 2010 A1
20100018248 Fieler et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100024472 Amin et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100107687 Andrian et al. May 2010 A1
20100132405 Nilsen Jun 2010 A1
20100147022 Hart et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100187181 Sortwell Jul 2010 A1
20100310439 Brok et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110132034 Beaumont et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110154856 Andrian et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168019 Northrop et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110192190 Andrian et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110265512 Bearden et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120006055 Van Santen et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120031143 Van Santem et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120031144 Northrop et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120079852 Northrop et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120125043 Cullinane et al. May 2012 A1
20120204599 Northrop et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130074541 Kaminsky et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130098105 Northrop Apr 2013 A1
20130192296 Betting et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140137599 Oelfke et al. May 2014 A1
20150158796 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159939 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159940 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159941 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159942 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159943 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159944 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159945 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159946 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150159947 Valencia et al. Jun 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
3 149 847 Jul 1983 DE
0 133 208 Feb 1985 EP
0 508 244 Oct 1992 EP
1 338 557 Mar 2005 EP
WO 2002032536 Apr 2002 WO
WO 2002039038 May 2002 WO
WO 2004047956 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2008034789 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008095258 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2008152030 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2009023605 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009029353 Mar 2009 WO
WO 2009087206 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2010023238 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010052299 May 2010 WO
WO 2010136442 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011026170 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011090553 Jul 2011 WO
WO 2013095828 Jun 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (23)
Entry
Aaron, D. et al. (2005) “Separation of CO2 from Flue Gas: A Review,” Separation Science and Technology, 40, pp. 321-348.
Amin, R. (2003) “Advanced Mini Natural Gas Liquefier,” LNG Journal, Mar.-Apr. 2003, pp. 20-23.
Black, S. (2006) “Chilled Ammonia Process for CO2 Capture,” Alstom Position Paper, Nov. 2006, 6 pgs.
Ciulla, Vincent (2007) “How the Engine Works,” About.com, Mar. 21, 2007, [retrieved from the internet on Aug. 17, 2012]. <URL: http://autorepair.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/aa060500a.html>.
“Cryogenics” Science Clarified, May 2, 2006 [retrieved from the internet on Aug. 17, 2012]. <URL: http://www.scienceclarified.com/Co-Di/Cryogenics.html>.
Denton, R. D. et al. (1985) “Integrated Low Temperature Processing of Sour Natural Gas,” Gas Processors Assoc., 64th Ann. Conv., pp. 92-96.
Guccione, E. (1963) “New Approach to Recovery of Helium from Natural Gas,” Chem. Engr., Sep. 30, 1963, pp. 76-78.
Hassan, S. M. N. (2005) “Techno-Economic Study of CO2 Capture Process for Cement Plants,” University of Waterloo—Thesis.
Haut, R. C. et al. (1988) “Development and Application of the Controlled Freeze Zone Process,” SPE 17757, SPE Gas Tech. Symp.—Dallas, TX, pp. 435-443.
Haut, R. C. et al. (1988) “Development and Application of the Controlled Freeze Zone Process,” OSEA 88197, 7th Offshore So. East Asia Conf., Singapore, Feb. 1988, pp. 840-848.
Haut, R. C. et al. (1989) “Development and Application of the Controlled Freeze Zone Process,” SPE Production Engineering, Aug. 1989, pp. 265-271.
Im, U. K. et al. (1971) “Heterogeneous Phase Behavior of Carbon Dioxide in n-Hexane and n-Heptane at Low Temperatures,” Jrnl. of Chem. Engineering Data, v.16.4, pp. 412-415.
Mitariten, M. et al. (2007) “The SorbeadTM Quick-Cycle Process for Simultaneous Removal of Water, Heavy Hydrocarbons and Mercaptans from Natural Gas,” Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conf., Feb. 25-27, 2007.
Northrop, P. Scott et al. (2004) “Cryogenic Sour Gas Process Attractive for Acid Gas Injection Applications,” 83rd Ann. Gas Processors Assoc. Convention, New Orleans, LA., pp. 1-8 (XP007912217).
Pagcatipunan, C. et al. (2005) “Maximize the Performance of Spray Nozzle Systems,” CEP Magazine, Dec. 2005, pp. 38-44.
Reyes, S. C. et al. (1997) “Frequency Modulation Methods for Diffusion and Adsorption Measurements in Porous Solids,” J. Phys. Chem. B, v.101, pp. 614-622.
Rubin, E. S. et al. (2002) “A Technical, Economic and Environmental Assessment of Amine-based CO2 Capture Technology for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Control,” U.S. Dept. of Energy, Oct. 2002, DOE/DE-FC26-00NT40935, 26 pages.
Spero, C. (2007) “Callide Oxyfuel Project,” CS Energy, cLET Seminar, Jul. 12, 2007, 9 pages.
Thomas, E. R. et al. (1987) “Conceptual Studies Using the Controlled Freeze Zone (CFZ) Process,” AlChE Summer Nat'l Mtg., Aug. 16-19, 1987.
Thomas, E. R. et al. (1988) “Conceptual Studies for CO2/Natural Gas Separation Using the Control Freeze Zone (CFZ) Process,” Gas Separation and Purification, v. 2, pp. 84-89.
Valencia, J. A. et al. (2008) “Controlled Freeze ZoneTM Technology for Enabling Processing of High CO2 and H2S Gas Reserves,” SPE-IPTC 12708, Kuala Lumpur, IN, v.4.1, Jan. 2008, pp. 2358-2363.
Victory, D. J. et al. (1987) “The CFZ Process: Direct Methane-Carbon Dioxide Fractionation,” 66th Ann. GPA Convention, Mar. 16-18, Denver, CO.
Wilson, R.W. et al. (1968) “Helium: Its Extraction and Purification,” Journ. Petrol. Tech., v. 20, pp. 341-344.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180224203 A1 Aug 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61613606 Mar 2012 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14376359 US
Child 15944323 US