The present invention relates to small, unmanned ground robotic vehicles. More particularly, the present invention relates to a serpentine robotic crawler having multiple tracked frame units interconnected through a high-degree of freedom actuated linkage.
Robotics is an active area of research, and many different types of robotic vehicles have been developed for various tasks. For example, unmanned aerial vehicles have been quite successful in military aerial reconnaissance. Less success has been achieved with unmanned ground vehicles, however, in part because the ground environment is significantly more difficult to traverse than the airborne environment.
Unmanned ground vehicles face many challenges when attempting mobility. Terrain can vary widely, including for example, loose and shifting materials, obstacles, vegetation, limited width or height openings, steps, and the like. A vehicle optimized for operation in one environment may perform poorly in other environments.
There are also tradeoffs associated with the size of vehicle. Large vehicles can handle some obstacles better, including for example steps, drops, gaps, and the like. On the other hand, large vehicles cannot easily negotiate narrow passages or crawl inside pipes, and are more easily deterred by vegetation. Large vehicles also tend to be more readily spotted, and thus are less desirable for discrete surveillance applications. In contrast, while small vehicles are more discrete, surmounting obstacles becomes a greater navigational challenge.
A variety of mobility configurations have been adapted to traverse difficult terrain. These options include legs, wheels, and tracks. Legged robots can be agile, but use complex control mechanisms to move and achieve stability. Wheeled vehicles can provide high mobility, but provide limited traction and require width in order to achieve stability.
Tracked vehicles are known and have traditionally been configured in a tank-like configuration. While tracked vehicles can provide a high degree of stability in some environments, tracked vehicles typically provide limited maneuverability with very small vehicles. Furthermore, known tracked vehicles are unable to accommodate a wide variety of obstacles, particularly when the terrain is narrow and the paths are tortuous and winding.
The present invention includes a serpentine robotic crawler which helps to overcome problems and deficiencies inherent in the prior art. In one embodiment, the serpentine robotic crawler includes a first frame and a second frame, each frame having a continuous track rotatably supported therein. The first and second frame are coupled by an actuated linkage arm. The linkage arm has a pair of wrist-like actuated linkage at each end, coupled to respective frames, and an elbow-like actuated joint between the wrist-like actuated linkages.
The present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings merely depict exemplary embodiments of the present invention they are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope. It will be readily appreciated that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, can be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Nonetheless, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
a)-10(c) illustrate perspective views of a serpentine robotic crawler in different inside-climbing configurations in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
a)-11(e) illustrate a top view of a sequence of movements of a serpentine robotic crawler righting itself in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
a)-12(f) illustrate perspective views of various poses for a serpentine robotic crawler in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
The following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the invention makes reference to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof and in which are shown, by way of illustration, exemplary embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. While these exemplary embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art practice the invention, it should be understood that other embodiments may be realized and that various changes to the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but is presented for purposes of illustration only and not limitation to describe the features and characteristics of the present invention, to set forth the best mode of operation of the invention, and to sufficiently enable one skilled in the art to practice the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is to be defined solely by the appended claims.
The following detailed description and exemplary embodiments of the invention will be best understood by reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein the elements and features of the invention are designated by numerals throughout.
With reference to
The wrist-like actuated linkages 22, 24, shown in further detail in
The wrist-like actuated linkages 22, 24 can be configured in various ways. For example, the wrist-like actuated linkage can include a series coupled combination of a yaw bending joint, a pitch bending joint, and a rotational joint, with various arm linkages coupled between the joints and the frame. For example, as shown in
Considering the frames 12, 14 and continuous tracks 16, 18 in further detail, the frame can be configured in various ways so that the continuous track is substantially enclosed so that only a bottom portion 60 is exposed as illustrated in
Referring back to
A first pose will be referred to herein as the “tank” configuration, where the first frame 12 and second frame 14 are positioned side by side as illustrated in
A second pose, referred to herein as the “train” configuration, is where the first frame 12 and second frame 14 are aligned end-to-end as illustrated in
The serpentine robotic crawler can also be configured for climbing the exterior of structure. As illustrated in
The serpentine robotic crawler can also be configured for climbing the interior of a structure.
It may also be possible for the serpentine robotic crawler to climb the interior of a structure 70 by facing exposed portions 72, 74 of the continuous tracks in the same direction, in contact with the same inner surface 80 of the structure, and placing a portion of the actuated linkage in contact with the opposite inner surface 82, as illustrated in
Various articulated movements are also possible for the serpentine robotic crawler. For example,
Other self-righting movement modes are also possible. For example, the serpentine robotic crawler 10 can be placed into an arched configuration by operating the actuated linkage arm 20 (as described further below) so the serpentine robotic crawler is substantially supported by only furthest apart ends of the tracks. This configuration can be unstable, allowing further actuation of the articulated linkage arm to cause the serpentine robotic crawler to tip over.
A serpentine robotic crawler in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is capable of a large number of poses and movement modes not possible with more conventional wheeled or tracked vehicles. Additional poses the serpentine robotic crawler 10 can adopt are illustrated in
Another pose can be referred to as a zag configuration, where the frames are oriented in parallel lines but offset and extending in opposite directions from the actuated linkage arm, as shown in
While the various poses have been described in a static sense, it will be understood that the serpentine robotic crawler can dynamically vary its pose as it is operated. Moreover, modified versions of the above poses may also prove useful, depending on the environment in which the serpentine robotic crawler operates.
As discussed above, various dynamic movement modes are possible. While the foregoing discussion has principle focused on operation of the endless tracks to provide propulsion, it will be appreciated that operation of the actuated linkage can also assist in propulsion. For example, sudden jerky movements of the actuated linkage can help to provide traction or to free the serpentine robotic crawler when entangled. As another example, the spatial orientation of the tracks can be periodically or continuously adjusted by the actuated linkage to conform to a surface being traveled over. For example,
Returning to the discussion of the articulated multi-degree of freedom linkage arm 20, various other configurations are also possible for embodiments of a serpentine robotic crawler. In general, the linkage arm includes at least seven actuated joints providing motion about seven different axes (although some of these axes may be aligned with each other at times). These joints can be uni-axial, bi-axial, or tri-axial joints. The linkage arm can include a series coupled combination of any of the following:
7 uni-axial joints
3 three uni-axial joints and 2 bi-axial joints
1 uni-axial joint and 2 tri-axial joints
2 bi-axial joints and 1 tri-axial joint
For example, the linkage arm can include a series combination of five actuated uni-axial bending joints and two actuated uni-axial rotary joints, wherein the bending joints provide at least two different joint axes. For example, four bending joints can be symmetrically disposed about a fifth bending joint located in the center of the linkage, two bending joints on each side of the center. The rotary joints can also be symmetrically disposed about the center. For example, the rotary joints can be located adjacent to the fifth (centered) bending joint (e.g., as illustrated in
Alternately, bi-axial joints, which provide the same degrees of freedom as two uni-axial joints in series, or tri-axial joints, which provide the same degrees of freedom as three uni-axial joints in series, can also be used. A bi-axial joint can, for example, provide bending in two axes. These axes can, but need not be, orthogonal. A tri-axial joint can, for example, provide bending in two lateral axes and rotation about a third longitudinal axis.
Joints need not be limited to revolute joints which provide bending or rotational movement. Prismatic joints which provide translational movement can also be included. Joints may incorporate both revolute and prismatic features to provide, for example, eccentric motions.
Control of the serpentine robotic vehicle 10 will now be discussed in further detail. As noted above, movement and pose of the serpentine robotic vehicle can be controlled through articulation of the actuated multiple degree of freedom linkage arm 20 and rotation of the continuous tracks 16, 18. Accordingly, as shown in schematic form in
Various implementations of the communications network are possible. For example, various communications protocols are known which allow a large number of nodes to communicate on a limited number of wires, including for example RS-485, RHAMIS, USB, Ethernet, and the like. Alternately, the communications network can include wireless components. For example, the communication network can include a wireless portion providing communication between the serpentine robotic crawler and a control system located remotely from the serpentine robotic crawler.
Various implementations of the control subsystem are possible. For example, in one embodiment, the control system can use a master replica for control of the serpentine robotic crawler. In a master replica control system, a master replica is located remotely from the serpentine robotic crawler. The master replica contains the same joints as the serpentine robotic crawler, and is manually manipulated into the desired poses. Sensors located at the joints sense the position of the joints, and these positions are communicated to the serpentine robotic crawler which actuates its joints to attempt to establish the same pose. Optionally, the joints in the serpentine robotic crawler can include force sensors, torque sensors, or both, allowing the force and/or torque on the joints to be measured. The joint forces and/or torques can optionally be communicated back to the replica master, providing force feedback into the control system. Various force feedback control systems are known which can be applied to embodiments of the present invention.
The control system may be integrated into the serpentine robotic crawler thereby allowing the crawler to operate autonomously. For example, the crawler may operate autonomously for an extended period of time. In an embodiment, the control system can include distributed joint and track controllers which locally control one or more closely associated joints. Distributed joint and track controllers can communicate with a master controller located within the crawler or located externally from the crawler.
In another embodiment, control of the serpentine robotic crawler can include control of a first frame, with other frames slaved to the first frame. For example, an operator can control the orientation and movement of the first frame. The other frames then follow the first frame. One particular control scheme can include automatically steering the other frames in following the first frame so as to minimize forces imposed on the actuated linkage arm.
As another example, control of the serpentine robotic crawler can include use of a joystick. For example, a two-dimensional joystick can be used to control a pose of the robot, for example by controlling motion of the actuated linkage via the joystick. Movement of the two-degrees of motion in the joystick can be translated into complex movements of the multi-degree of freedom actuated linkage via predefined primitives. As a particular example, movement of the joystick to the left or right can arch the serpentine robotic crawler to the left or right, with sustained holding of the joystick moving the serpentine robotic crawler between a tank-like configuration and a snake-like configuration. As another particular example, movement of the joystick to the front or back can arch the serpentine robotic crawler up or down, with sustained holding of the joystick forward or backward placing the serpentine robotic crawler into an inside- or outside-climbing configuration. Of course, a variety of mappings from a joystick to movements can be defined, as will be appreciated. Interface between an operator and the control system can be provided via a menu driven interface operational on a personal computer, laptop, personal data assistant, and the like, as is known.
The control system can also be configured to provide a degree of compliance in the joints. For example, forces applied to the joints by the environment of the flexible robotic crawler can be sensed and communicated to the control system. When certain force thresholds are exceeded, the joints can be allowed to move. For example, joints can include breakaway clutches, implemented either via mechanical systems, electronic systems, or hybrid electro-mechanical systems. Force limit thresholds can be made adjustable to provide variable compliance to the serpentine robotic crawler. For example, high thresholds to provide a stiff posture may prove useful in pushing through certain types of obstructions. Alternately, low thresholds may prove useful in bending around other types of obstructions.
As another example, the control system can be implemented using a processing system. Various movement primitives can be preprogrammed, including for example primitives to assume certain poses (e.g., tank, zag, arched, train, or climbing configurations), and primitives for movement (e.g., forward, backwards). Control can include feedback from joint force sensors and environmental sensors. Hybrid human and automated control can be combined. For example, high-level manual commands/primitives can be implemented using automated low-level feedback loops that execute the commands/primitives. Control function can be divided into subsystems, including for example, pose control, compliance control, movement control, force control, and hybrid combinations thereof.
An alternate configuration of a serpentine robotic crawler is illustrated in
A serpentine robotic crawler can also include various sensors or tools positioned on the actuated multi-degree of freedom linkage arm and or the frame. For example, as illustrated in
Summarizing and reiterating to some extent, serpentine robotic crawlers in accordance with embodiments of the present invention can be deployed in a variety of applications and environments. For example, and not by way of limitation, applications can include search and rescue, military operations, and industrial operations. The serpentine robotic crawler can help to avoid the need to expose humans to hazardous environments, such as unstable buildings, military conflict situations, and chemically, biologically, or nuclear contaminated environments. The configurational flexibility of the serpentine robotic crawler provides multiple movement modes. For example, movement in a tank-like configuration can provide high stability. Movement in a snake-like configuration can provide access through narrow passages or pipes. Climbing the outside of structures, e.g., a pole, and climbing the inside of structures, e.g., inside a pipe, are also possible.
The foregoing detailed description describes the invention with reference to specific exemplary embodiments. However, it will be appreciated that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims. The detailed description and accompanying drawings are to be regarded as merely illustrative, rather than as restrictive, and all such modifications or changes, if any, are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention as described and set forth herein.
More specifically, while illustrative exemplary embodiments of the invention have been described herein, the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, but includes any and all embodiments having modifications, omissions, combinations (e.g., of aspects across various embodiments), adaptations and/or alterations as would be appreciated by those in the art based on the foregoing detailed description. The limitations in the claims are to be interpreted broadly based the language employed in the claims and not limited to examples described in the foregoing detailed description or during the prosecution of the application, which examples are to be construed as non-exclusive. For example, in the present disclosure, the term “preferably” is non-exclusive where it is intended to mean “preferably, but not limited to.” Any steps recited in any method or process claims may be executed in any order and are not limited to the order presented in the claims. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined solely by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the descriptions and examples given above.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/985,323, filed Nov. 13, 2007, and entitled “Serpentine Robotic Crawler”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/858,917, filed Nov. 13, 2006, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1107874 | Appleby | Aug 1914 | A |
1112460 | Leavitt | Oct 1914 | A |
1515756 | Roy | Nov 1924 | A |
1975726 | Martinage | Oct 1934 | A |
2025999 | Myers | Dec 1935 | A |
2082920 | Aulmont | Jun 1937 | A |
2129557 | Beach | Sep 1938 | A |
2311475 | Schmeiser | Feb 1943 | A |
2312072 | Broadwater | Feb 1943 | A |
2329582 | Bishop | Sep 1943 | A |
2345763 | Mayne | Apr 1944 | A |
2701169 | Cannon | Feb 1955 | A |
2850147 | Hill | Sep 1958 | A |
2933143 | Robinson | Apr 1960 | A |
2967737 | Moore | Jan 1961 | A |
3037571 | Zelle | Jun 1962 | A |
3060972 | Sheldon | Oct 1962 | A |
3166138 | Dunn, Jr. | Jan 1965 | A |
3190286 | Stokes | Jun 1965 | A |
3215219 | Forsyth et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3223462 | Dalrymple | Dec 1965 | A |
3266059 | Stelle | Aug 1966 | A |
3284964 | Saito | Nov 1966 | A |
3311424 | Taylor | Mar 1967 | A |
3362492 | Hansen | Jan 1968 | A |
3387896 | Sobota | Jun 1968 | A |
3489236 | Goodwin | Jan 1970 | A |
3497083 | Anderson | Feb 1970 | A |
3565198 | Ames | Feb 1971 | A |
3572325 | Bazell | Mar 1971 | A |
3609804 | Morrison | Oct 1971 | A |
3650343 | Helsell | Mar 1972 | A |
3700115 | Johnson | Oct 1972 | A |
3707218 | Payne | Dec 1972 | A |
3712481 | Harwood | Jan 1973 | A |
3715146 | Robertson | Feb 1973 | A |
3757635 | Hickerson | Sep 1973 | A |
3808078 | Snellman | Apr 1974 | A |
3820616 | Juergens | Jun 1974 | A |
3841424 | Purcell | Oct 1974 | A |
3864983 | Jacobsen | Feb 1975 | A |
3933214 | Guibord | Jan 1976 | A |
3934664 | Pohjola | Jan 1976 | A |
3974907 | Shaw | Aug 1976 | A |
4051914 | Pohjola | Oct 1977 | A |
4059315 | Jolliffe | Nov 1977 | A |
4068905 | Black | Jan 1978 | A |
4107948 | Maolaug | Aug 1978 | A |
4109971 | Black | Aug 1978 | A |
4132279 | Van der Lende | Jan 1979 | A |
4218101 | Thompson | Aug 1980 | A |
4260053 | Onodera | Apr 1981 | A |
4332317 | Bahre | Jun 1982 | A |
4332424 | Thompson | Jun 1982 | A |
4339031 | Densmore | Jul 1982 | A |
4393728 | Larson | Jul 1983 | A |
4396233 | Slaght | Aug 1983 | A |
4453611 | Stacy, Jr. | Jun 1984 | A |
4483407 | Iwamoto et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4489826 | Dubson | Dec 1984 | A |
4494417 | Larson | Jan 1985 | A |
4551061 | Olenick | Nov 1985 | A |
4589460 | Albee | May 1986 | A |
4621965 | Wilcock | Nov 1986 | A |
4636137 | Lemelson | Jan 1987 | A |
4646906 | Wilcox, Jr. | Mar 1987 | A |
4661039 | Brenhold | Apr 1987 | A |
4700693 | Lia | Oct 1987 | A |
4706506 | Lestelle | Nov 1987 | A |
4712969 | Kimura | Dec 1987 | A |
4714125 | Stacy, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4727949 | Rea | Mar 1988 | A |
4736826 | White et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4752105 | Barnard | Jun 1988 | A |
4756662 | Tanie | Jul 1988 | A |
4765795 | Rebman | Aug 1988 | A |
4784042 | Paynter | Nov 1988 | A |
4796607 | Allred, III | Jan 1989 | A |
4806066 | Rhodes | Feb 1989 | A |
4815319 | Clement | Mar 1989 | A |
4815911 | Bengtsson | Mar 1989 | A |
4818175 | Kimura | Apr 1989 | A |
4828339 | Thomas | May 1989 | A |
4848179 | Ubhayakar | Jul 1989 | A |
4862808 | Hedgcoxe | Sep 1989 | A |
4878451 | Siren | Nov 1989 | A |
4900218 | Sutherland | Feb 1990 | A |
4909341 | Rippingale et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4924153 | Toru et al. | May 1990 | A |
4932491 | Collins, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
4932831 | White et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936639 | Pohjola | Jun 1990 | A |
4997790 | Woo | Mar 1991 | A |
5018591 | Price | May 1991 | A |
5021798 | Ubhayakar | Jun 1991 | A |
5022812 | Coughlan | Jun 1991 | A |
5046914 | Holland et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5080000 | Bubic | Jan 1992 | A |
5130631 | Gordon | Jul 1992 | A |
5142932 | Moya | Sep 1992 | A |
5174168 | Takagi | Dec 1992 | A |
5174405 | Carra | Dec 1992 | A |
5186526 | Pennington | Feb 1993 | A |
5199771 | James | Apr 1993 | A |
5205612 | Sugden et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5214858 | Pepper | Jun 1993 | A |
5219264 | McClure et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5252870 | Jacobsen | Oct 1993 | A |
5297443 | Wentz | Mar 1994 | A |
5317952 | Immega | Jun 1994 | A |
5337732 | Grundfest | Aug 1994 | A |
5350033 | Kraft | Sep 1994 | A |
5354124 | James | Oct 1994 | A |
5363935 | Schempf et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5386741 | Rennex | Feb 1995 | A |
5413454 | Movsesian | May 1995 | A |
5426336 | Jacobsen | Jun 1995 | A |
5428713 | Matsumaru | Jun 1995 | A |
5435405 | Schempf et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440916 | Stone et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443354 | Stone et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451135 | Schempf | Sep 1995 | A |
5465525 | Mifune | Nov 1995 | A |
5466056 | James | Nov 1995 | A |
5469756 | Feiten | Nov 1995 | A |
5516249 | Brimhall | May 1996 | A |
5551545 | Gelfman | Sep 1996 | A |
5556370 | Maynard | Sep 1996 | A |
5562843 | Yasumoto | Oct 1996 | A |
5567110 | Sutherland | Oct 1996 | A |
5570992 | Lemelson | Nov 1996 | A |
5573316 | Wankowski | Nov 1996 | A |
5588688 | Jacobsen | Dec 1996 | A |
5672044 | Lemelson | Sep 1997 | A |
5697285 | Nappi | Dec 1997 | A |
5712961 | Matsuo | Jan 1998 | A |
5749828 | Solomon | May 1998 | A |
5770913 | Mizzi | Jun 1998 | A |
5816769 | bauer | Oct 1998 | A |
5821666 | Matsumoto | Oct 1998 | A |
5842381 | Feiten | Dec 1998 | A |
RE36025 | Suzuki | Jan 1999 | E |
5878783 | Smart | Mar 1999 | A |
5888235 | Jacobsen | Mar 1999 | A |
5902254 | Magram | May 1999 | A |
5906591 | Dario | May 1999 | A |
5984032 | Gremillion | Nov 1999 | A |
5996346 | Maynard | Dec 1999 | A |
6016385 | Yee | Jan 2000 | A |
6030057 | Fikse | Feb 2000 | A |
6056237 | Woodland | May 2000 | A |
6107795 | Smart | Aug 2000 | A |
6109705 | Courtemanche | Aug 2000 | A |
6113343 | Goldenberg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132133 | Muro et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138604 | Anderson | Oct 2000 | A |
6162171 | Ng | Dec 2000 | A |
6186604 | Fikse | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203126 | Harguth | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6260501 | Agnew | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263989 | Won | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264293 | Musselman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264294 | Musselman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281489 | Tubel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7843431 | Robbins et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6325749 | Inokuchi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333631 | Das et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339993 | Comello | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6380889 | Herrmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394204 | Haringer | May 2002 | B1 |
6405798 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408224 | Okamoto | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411055 | Fujita | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422509 | Yim | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430475 | Okamoto | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6431296 | Won | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446718 | Barrett et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450104 | Grant et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484083 | Hayward | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488306 | Shirey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505896 | Boivin | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512345 | Borenstein | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6523629 | Buttz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529806 | Licht | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540310 | Cartwright | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557954 | Hattori | May 2003 | B1 |
6563084 | Bandy | May 2003 | B1 |
6574958 | MacGregor | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6576406 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595812 | Haney | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610007 | Tartaglia et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6619146 | Kerrebrock | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6651804 | Thomas | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652164 | Stiepel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6668951 | Won | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6708068 | Sakaue | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715575 | Karpik | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6772673 | Seto | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773327 | Felice | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774597 | Borenstein | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799815 | Krishnan | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6820653 | Schempf et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6831436 | Gonzalez | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835173 | Couvillon, Jr. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837318 | Craig | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6840588 | Deland | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866671 | Tierney | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870343 | Borenstein et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6917176 | Schempf et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923693 | Borgen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936003 | Iddan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6959231 | Maeda | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7020701 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7040426 | Berg | May 2006 | B1 |
7044245 | Anhalt et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7069124 | Whittaker et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7090637 | Danitz | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137465 | Kerrebrock | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7144057 | Young et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7171279 | Buckingham et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188473 | Asada | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7188568 | Stout | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7228203 | Koselka et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235046 | Anhalt et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7331436 | Pack et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7387179 | Anhalt et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7415321 | Okazaki et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7546912 | Pack et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7600592 | Goldenberg et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7645110 | Ogawa et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7654348 | Ohm et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7775312 | Maggio | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7860614 | Reger | Dec 2010 | B1 |
20010037163 | Allard | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020128714 | Manasas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140392 | Borenstein | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030000747 | Sugiyama | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069474 | Couvillon, Jr. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097080 | Esashi | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110938 | Seto | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030223844 | Schiele | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030571 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040099175 | Perrot et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103740 | Townsend | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040168837 | Michaud | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040216931 | Won | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040216932 | Giovanetti | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050007055 | Borenstein et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027412 | Hobson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085693 | Belson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107669 | Couvillon, Jr. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050166413 | Crampton | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050168068 | Courtemanche et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050168070 | Dandurand | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050225162 | Gibbins | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235898 | Hobson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235899 | Yamamoto | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050288819 | de Guzman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000137 | Valdivia y Alvarado | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060005733 | Rastegar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010702 | Roth | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060070775 | Anhalt | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060156851 | Jacobsen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060225928 | Nelson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229773 | Peretz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070029117 | Goldenberg et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070156286 | Yamauchi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070193790 | Goldenberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070260378 | Clodfelter | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080115687 | Gal et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136254 | Jacobsen | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164079 | Jacobsen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167752 | Jacobsen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168070 | Naphade | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215185 | Jacobsen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080217993 | Jacobsen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272647 | Hirose et al. | Nov 2008 | A9 |
20080281231 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281468 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284244 | Hirose et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090025988 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030562 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090035097 | Loane | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090171151 | Choset et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100030377 | Unsworth | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100174422 | Jacobsen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100201185 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100201187 | Jacobsen | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100317244 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318242 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2512299 | Sep 2004 | CA |
1603068 | Apr 2005 | CN |
2774717 | Apr 2006 | CN |
1970373 | May 2007 | CN |
3025840 | Feb 1982 | DE |
3626238 | Feb 1988 | DE |
19617852 | Oct 1997 | DE |
19714464 | Oct 1997 | DE |
19704080 | Aug 1998 | DE |
10018075 | Jan 2001 | DE |
102004010089 | Sep 2005 | DE |
0105418 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0818283 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0924034 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1444043 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1510896 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1832501 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1832502 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2638813 | May 1990 | FR |
2850350 | Jul 2004 | FR |
1199729 | Jul 1970 | GB |
52 57625 | May 1977 | JP |
58-89480 | May 1983 | JP |
60015275 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60047771 | Mar 1985 | JP |
60060516 | Apr 1985 | JP |
60139576 | Jul 1985 | JP |
61001581 | Jan 1986 | JP |
61089182 | May 1986 | JP |
63306988 | Dec 1988 | JP |
04092784 | Mar 1992 | JP |
05147560 | Jun 1993 | JP |
06-115465 | Apr 1994 | JP |
03535508 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2005111595 | Apr 2005 | JP |
WO 9726039 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 0010073 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0216995 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0330727 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 0337515 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2005018428 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2006068080 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2008049050 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008076194 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008135978 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009009673 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100258365 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60858917 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11985323 | Nov 2007 | US |
Child | 12820881 | US |