Robotics is an active area of research, and many different types of robotic vehicles have been developed for various tasks. For example, unmanned aerial vehicles have been quite successful in military aerial reconnaissance. Less success has been achieved with unmanned ground vehicles, however, in part because the ground environment is significantly more difficult to traverse than the airborne environment.
Unmanned ground vehicles face many challenges when attempting mobility. Terrain can vary widely, including for example, loose and shifting materials, obstacles, vegetation, limited width or height openings, steps, and the like. A vehicle optimized for operation in one environment may perform poorly in other environments.
There are also tradeoffs associated with the size of vehicle. Large vehicles can handle some obstacles better, including for example steps, drops, gaps, and the like. On the other hand, large vehicles cannot easily negotiate narrow passages or crawl inside pipes, and are more easily deterred by vegetation. Large vehicles also tend to be more readily spotted, and thus can be less desirable, such as for discrete surveillance applications. In contrast, while small vehicles are more discrete, surmounting obstacles becomes a greater navigational challenge.
A variety of mobility configurations have been adapted to traverse difficult terrain. These options include legs, wheels, and tracks. Legged robots can be agile, but use complex control mechanisms to move and achieve stability. Wheeled vehicles can provide high mobility, but provide limited traction and require width in order to achieve stability.
Features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the invention; and, wherein:
Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended.
As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained. The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result.
An initial overview of technology embodiments is provided below and then specific technology embodiments are described in further detail later. This initial summary is intended to aid readers in understanding the technology more quickly but is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the technology nor is it intended to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Tracked vehicles are known and have traditionally been configured in a tank-like configuration. While tracked vehicles can provide a high degree of stability in some environments, tracked vehicles typically provide limited maneuverability with very small vehicles. Furthermore, many known tracked vehicles are unable to accommodate a wide variety of obstacles, particularly when the terrain is narrow and the paths are tortuous and winding. Additionally, linkages or couplings between tracks of a vehicle can come into contact with obstacles and can even become lodged on the obstacles, thus hindering movement of the vehicle.
Accordingly, a serpentine robotic crawler is disclosed that allows movement of a linkage arm. In one aspect, the linkage arm can be moved to expose leading and/or trailing ends of the track to increase the ability of the tracked vehicle to overcome obstacles. In some exemplary embodiments, the serpentine robotic crawler can include a first frame having a first continuous track rotatably supported by the first frame, a second frame having a second continuous track rotatably supported by the second frame, and a linkage arm coupling the first and second frames together in tandem. The linkage arm can have a first elbow-like joint formed by an interface between the first frame and a first linkage member, a second elbow-like joint formed by an interface between the second frame and a second linkage member, a first wrist-like actuated linkage coupled to the first linkage member, a second wrist-like actuated linkage coupled to the second linkage member, and an actuated third elbow-like joint formed by a coupling of the first wrist-like actuated linkage and the second wrist-like actuated linkage. The first wrist-like actuated linkage can include actuated joints that provide rotational movement about a longitudinal axis and bending movement about two different lateral axes. The second wrist-like actuated linkage can include actuated joints that provide rotational movement about a longitudinal axis and bending movement about two different lateral axes. The third elbow-like joint can provide bending movement about a lateral axis. The first linkage member can be positionable via first elbow-like joint to locate the first wrist-like actuated linkage out of plane from the first frame. The second linkage member can be positionable via second elbow-like joint to locate the second wrist-like actuated linkage out of plane from the second frame.
Other exemplary embodiments of a serpentine robotic crawler are also disclosed that can include a first frame having a first continuous track rotatably supported by the first frame, a second frame having a second continuous track rotatably supported by the second frame, and a linkage arm coupling the first and second frames together in tandem. The linkage arm can also be movable about a first lateral axis associated with the first frame, a second lateral axis associated with the second frame, and at least two longitudinal axes, which longitudinal axes can be oriented or moved by movement of the linkage arm about at least one of the first lateral axis and the second lateral axis. Movement about the first lateral axis and the second lateral axis can allow for or facilitate exposure of leading and trailing ends of each continuous track.
Additionally, still other exemplary embodiments of a serpentine robotic crawler are disclosed that can include a first frame having a first continuous track rotatably supported by the first frame, a second frame having a second continuous track rotatably supported by the second frame, and a linkage arm coupling the first and second frames together in tandem. The linkage arm can have a first wrist-like actuated linkage coupled to the first frame, a second wrist-like actuated linkage coupled to the second frame, and an elbow-like actuated joint formed by a coupling of the first wrist-like actuated linkage and the second wrist-like actuated linkage. The first wrist-like actuated linkage can include actuated joints that provide rotational movement about a longitudinal axis and bending movement about two different lateral axes. The second wrist-like actuated linkage can include actuated joints that provide rotational movement about a longitudinal axis and bending movement about two different lateral axes. The elbow-like actuated joint can provide bending movement about a lateral axis. The first wrist-like actuated linkage can be located or positioned out of plane from the first frame and the second wrist-like actuated linkage can be located or positioned out of plane from the second frame, wherein these are in a fixed or non-movable position relative to the respective frames.
One exemplary embodiment of a serpentine robotic crawler is illustrated in
For example, as illustrated in
As discussed further herein, movement of the linkage arm 120 about the first lateral axis 101 and/or the second lateral axis 102 can provide for a multitude of different configurations or poses of the serpentine robotic crawler 100. Furthermore, the linkage arm 120 can include movement about one or more of axes 105, 106, 107, 108, 109. These axes can provide for additional poses of the serpentine robotic crawler 100, which can further enhance maneuverability of the serpentine robotic crawler 100.
In one aspect, the linkage arm 120 can have a first elbow-like joint 121 formed by an interface between the first frame 111 and a first linkage member 151. Similarly, the linkage arm 120 can have a second elbow-like joint 122 formed by an interface between the second frame 112 and a second linkage member 152. The first and second elbow-like joints 121, 122 can provide for rotation of the first and second linkage members 151 and 152 about axes 101, 102, respectively. The linkage arm 120 can also include a first wrist-like linkage 141 coupled to the first linkage member 151. The first wrist-like linkage 141 can include joints 123, 125, 127 that can provide rotational movement about longitudinal axis 103 and bending movement about two different lateral axes 105, 107, respectively. In one aspect, the two different lateral axes 105, 107 can be at a substantially right angle to one another. Similarly, the linkage arm 120 can also include a second wrist-like linkage 142 coupled to the linkage member 152. The second wrist-like linkage 142 can include joints 124, 126, 128 that provide rotational movement about a longitudinal axis 104 and bending movement about two different lateral axes 106, 108, respectively. In one aspect, the two different lateral axes 106, 108 can be at a substantially right angle to one another.
Additionally, the linkage arm 120 can include a third elbow-like joint 129 formed by a coupling of the first wrist-like linkage 141 and the second wrist-like linkage 142. The third elbow-like joint 129 can provide bending movement about lateral axis 109. In one aspect, the first linkage member 151, via the first elbow-like joint 121, can be positionable to allow the first wrist-like linkage 141 to be out of plane from the first frame 111. Similarly, the second linkage member 152, via the second elbow-like joint 122, can be positionable to allow the second wrist-like actuated linkage 142 to be out of plane from the second frame 112.
In one aspect, the first lateral axis 101 and thus, the first elbow-like joint 121 can be located between the ends 115, 117 of the first continuous track 113. This can allow the movement about the first lateral axis 101 to effectively position the linkage arm 120 to expose the end 115 of the first continuous track 113. In a specific aspect, the first lateral axis 101 of the first elbow-like joint 121 can be coaxial with a drive wheel 131 for the first continuous track 113. The same can be the case for the location of the second lateral axis 102, as well. In another aspect, respective movement of the first and second linkage members 151 and 152 about the first lateral axis 101 and the second lateral axis 102 can be actuated. Alternatively, respective movement of the first and second linkage members 151 and 152 about the first lateral axis 101 and the second lateral axis 102 can be passive. Additionally, a range of motion of the first and second linkage members 151 and 152 about the first lateral axis 101 can be physically limited, such as by a mechanical stop 133, to prevent contact between at least a portion of the linkage arm 120 (such as linkage member 151) and the first continuous track 113. A similar range of motion limiter can also prevent contact between at least a portion of the linkage arm 120 (such as linkage member 152) and the second continuous track 114.
It should be recognized that the joints and/or linkages discussed herein can be actuated or passive, in any combination. In one aspect, a passive joint or linkage can be manipulated or movable to a selectively fixed position and held in place, for example, by incorporating an adjustable fastener. In another aspect, a passive joint or linkage can include a dampener and/or a spring to control various aspects (e.g., those related to movement) of the joint or linkage.
With respect to the linkage arm 120, various other configurations are also possible for embodiments of a serpentine robotic crawler. In general, the linkage arm 120 can include at least nine actuated joints providing motion about nine different axes (although some of these axes may be aligned with each other at times). These joints can be uni-axial, bi-axial, or tri-axial joints. The linkage arm can include a series coupled combination of any of the following:
For example, a linkage arm can include a series combination of seven uni-axial bending joints and two uni-axial rotary joints. For example, six bending joints can be symmetrically disposed about a seventh bending joint located in the center of the linkage, three bending joints on each side of the center. The rotary joints can also be symmetrically disposed about the center. For example, the rotary joints can be located adjacent to the seventh (centered) bending joint (e.g., as illustrated in
Alternately, bi-axial joints, which provide the same degrees of freedom as two uni-axial joints in series, or tri-axial joints, which provide the same degrees of freedom as three uni-axial joints in series, can also be used. A bi-axial joint can, for example, provide bending in two axes. These axes can, but need not be, orthogonal. A tri-axial joint can, for example, provide bending in two lateral axes and rotation about a third longitudinal axis.
Joints need not be limited to revolute joints which provide bending or rotational movement. Prismatic joints which provide translational movement can also be included. Joints may incorporate both revolute and prismatic features to provide, for example, eccentric motions.
In one aspect, each of the first and second frames 111, 112 can include a drive coupled to the first and second continuous tracks, respectively, as illustrated by drive 134 of the second frame 112. In a particular aspect, the first elbow-like joint 121 and/or the second elbow-like joint 122 can be actuatable by one of the drives. In other words, the same drive that causes movement of a continuous track can also cause movement of an associated joint. In another aspect, the first elbow-like joint 121 and/or the second elbow-like joint 122 can be actuated to manipulate or move linkage members 151 and 152, respectively, by a dedicated drive that is distinct from the drive used to cause movement of the continuous tracks. A drive for a continuous track can be configured to drive the continuous track in either direction (e.g., clockwise and counterclockwise) over a range of speeds. As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, various types of drives and coupling techniques for applying drive power to a continuous track can be applied in embodiments of the present invention.
The combination of a multi-degree of freedom linkage arm 120 with the tracked frames 111, 112 can make the serpentine robotic crawler 100 capable of many different modes of movement. Operating the serpentine robotic crawler 100 can include articulating the linkage arm 120 to establish a desired pose for the serpentine robotic crawler 100. Drive operation of the continuous tracks 113, 114 can be coordinated with articulation of the linkage arm 120 to further control the pose and provide movement of the serpentine robotic crawler 100. When establishing a pose of the serpentine robotic crawler 100, torque and forces on the joints may be taken into account, as discussed further herein.
A first pose of the serpentine robotic crawler 100 will be referred to herein as the “tank” configuration, as illustrated in
A second pose of a serpentine robotic crawler 200 will be referred to herein as the “train” configuration, as illustrated in
The serpentine robotic crawler 200 is similar in many respects to the serpentine robotic crawler 100 illustrated in
As illustrated in
With reference to
The serpentine robotic crawler can also be configured for climbing the exterior of various structures. As illustrated in
The serpentine robotic crawler 400 can also be configured for climbing the interior of a structure.
As illustrated in
Additionally, in a train configuration, for example,
It should be understood that the various poses of the serpentine robotic crawler 500 described above can be viewed in a static sense or in a dynamic sense, where the serpentine robotic crawler 500 dynamically varies its pose as it is operated. Moreover, modified versions of the above poses may also prove useful, depending on the environment in which the serpentine robotic crawler 500 operates. It should also be appreciated that operation of the linkage arm 520 can also assist in propulsion. For example, sudden jerky movements of the linkage arm 520 can help to provide traction or to free the serpentine robotic crawler 500 when entangled. As another example, the spatial orientation of the tracks can be periodically or continuously adjusted by the linkage arm 520 to conform to a surface being traveled over.
Control of a serpentine robotic crawler will now be discussed in further detail. As noted above, movement and pose of the serpentine robotic crawler can be controlled through articulation of a multiple degree of freedom linkage arm and rotation of continuous tracks. Accordingly, as shown in schematic form in
Various implementations of the communications network are possible. For example, various communications protocols are known which allow a large number of nodes to communicate on a limited number of wires, including for example RS-485, RHAMIS, USB, Ethernet, and the like. Alternately, the communications network can include wireless components. For example, the communication network can include a wireless portion providing communication between the serpentine robotic crawler and a control system located remotely from the serpentine robotic crawler.
Various implementations of the control subsystem are possible. For example, in one embodiment, the control system can use a replica master for control of the serpentine robotic crawler. In a replica master control system, a replica master is located remotely from the serpentine robotic crawler. The replica master contains the same joints as the serpentine robotic crawler, and is manually manipulated into the desired poses. Sensors located at the joints sense the position of the joints, and these positions are communicated to the serpentine robotic crawler which actuates its joints to attempt to establish the same pose. Optionally, the joints in the serpentine robotic crawler can include force sensors, torque sensors, or both, allowing the force and/or torque on the joints to be measured. The joint forces and/or torques can optionally be communicated back to the replica master, providing force feedback into the control system. Various force feedback control systems are known which can be applied to embodiments of the present invention.
The control system may be integrated into the serpentine robotic crawler thereby allowing the crawler to operate autonomously. For example, the crawler may operate autonomously for an extended period of time. In an embodiment, the control system can include distributed joint and track controllers which locally control one or more closely associated joints. Distributed joint and track controllers can communicate with a master controller located within the crawler or located externally from the crawler.
In another embodiment, control of the serpentine robotic crawler can include control of a first frame, with other frames slaved to the first frame. For example, an operator can control the orientation and movement of the first frame. The other frames then follow the first frame. One particular control scheme can include automatically steering the other frames in following the first frame so as to minimize forces imposed on the linkage arm.
As another example, control of the serpentine robotic crawler can include use of a joystick. For example, a two-dimensional joystick can be used to control a pose of the robot, for example by controlling motion of the actuated linkage via the joystick. Movement of the two-degrees of motion in the joystick can be translated into complex movements of the multi-degree of freedom actuated linkage via predefined primitives. As a particular example, movement of the joystick to the left or right can arch the serpentine robotic crawler to the left or right, with sustained holding of the joystick moving the serpentine robotic crawler between a tank-like configuration and a train-like configuration. As another particular example, movement of the joystick to the front or back can arch the serpentine robotic crawler up or down, with sustained holding of the joystick forward or backward placing the serpentine robotic crawler into an inside- or outside-climbing configuration. Of course, a variety of mappings from a joystick to movements can be defined, as will be appreciated. Interface between an operator and the control system can be provided via a menu driven interface operational on a personal computer, laptop, personal data assistant, and the like, as is known.
The control system can also be configured to provide a degree of compliance in the joints. For example, forces applied to the joints by the environment of the flexible robotic crawler can be sensed and communicated to the control system. When certain force thresholds are exceeded, the joints can be allowed to move. For example, joints can include breakaway clutches, implemented either via mechanical systems, electronic systems, or hybrid electro-mechanical systems. Force limit thresholds can be made adjustable to provide variable compliance to the serpentine robotic crawler. For example, high thresholds to provide a stiff posture may prove useful in pushing through certain types of obstructions. Alternately, low thresholds may prove useful in bending around other types of obstructions.
As another example, the control system can be implemented using a processing system. Various movement primitives can be preprogrammed, including for example primitives to assume certain poses (e.g., tank, train, or climbing configurations), and primitives for movement (e.g., forward, backwards). Control can include feedback from joint force sensors and environmental sensors. Hybrid human and automated control can be combined. For example, high-level manual commands/primitives can be implemented using automated low-level feedback loops that execute the commands/primitives. Control function can be divided into subsystems, including for example, pose control, compliance control, movement control, force control, and hybrid combinations thereof.
In an alternate configuration of a serpentine robotic crawler, the serpentine robotic crawler can include a more than two frame units, each having a continuous track rotatably supported therein. At least one multi-degree of freedom linkage arm can be coupled between the frame units. For example, with N frame units, N−1 linkage arms are used to intercouple the frames into a multi-frame train. The multi-degree of freedom linkage arms can include at least nine joint axes, as described above, for example. Optionally, the multi-degree of freedom linkage arm can be removably connected between the frame units, to allow the multi-frame train to be reconfigured, for example into a number of individual frames, pairs of frames, or shorter multi-frame trains.
A serpentine robotic crawler can also include various sensors or tools positioned on the actuated multi-degree of freedom linkage arm and or the frame. For example, a serpentine robotic crawler can have a camera disposed on one of the frames. As another example, cameras can be disposed on both the leading and the trailing frame. For example, a front camera can be used primarily for scanning the environment, and a rear camera can be used for observing the pose of the serpentine robotic crawler for control purposes. Other sensors, including for example, radar, lidar, infrared detectors, temperature sensors, chemical sensors, force sensors, motion detectors, microphones, antennas, and the like can be disposed on the serpentine robotic crawler. As another example, tools, including for example, light sources, clamps, grippers, manipulators, cutters, drills, material samplers, and the like can also be disposed on the serpentine robotic crawler. As another example, the serpentine robotic crawler can include articulated arms disposed on the frame. Examples of such articulated arms can be found in commonly owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/985,336, entitled “Tracked Robotic Vehicle with Articulated Arms,” filed Nov. 13, 2007, which describes a serpentine robotic crawler having articulated arms, and which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Applications for a serpentine robotic crawler can include search and rescue, military operations, and industrial operations. The serpentine robotic crawler can help to avoid the need to expose humans to hazardous environments, such as unstable buildings, military conflict situations, and chemically, biologically, or nuclear contaminated environments. The configurational flexibility of the serpentine robotic crawler provides multiple movement modes. For example, movement in a tank-like configuration can provide high stability. Movement in a train-like configuration can provide access through narrow passages or pipes. Climbing the outside of structures, e.g., a pole, and climbing the inside of structures, e.g., inside a pipe, are also possible.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a method for facilitating operation of a serpentine robotic crawler is disclosed. The method can comprise providing a serpentine robotic crawler. The serpentine robotic crawler can include a first frame having a first continuous track rotatably supported by the first frame, a second frame having a second continuous track rotatably supported by the second frame, and a linkage arm coupling the first and second frames together in tandem. The linkage arm can have a first elbow-like joint formed by an interface between the first frame and a first linkage member, and a second elbow-like joint formed by an interface between the second frame and a second linkage member. The linkage arm can also have a first wrist-like actuated linkage coupled to the first linkage member. The first wrist-like actuated linkage can include actuated joints that provide rotational movement about a longitudinal axis and bending movement about two different lateral axes. The linkage arm can also include a second wrist-like actuated linkage coupled to the second linkage member. The second wrist-like actuated linkage can include actuated joints that provide rotational movement about a longitudinal axis and bending movement about two different lateral axes. The linkage arm can further include a third elbow-like joint formed by a coupling of the first wrist-like actuated linkage and the second wrist-like actuated linkage. The third elbow-like actuated joint can provide bending movement about a lateral axis. The method can further comprise facilitating positioning of the first wrist-like actuated linkage out of plane from the first frame with the first elbow-like actuated joint, via the first linkage member. Additionally, the method can comprise facilitating positioning of the second wrist-like actuated linkage out of plane from the second frame with the second elbow-like joint, via the second linkage member. The positioning of the first and second wrist-like linkages relative to the frame can include embodiments that comprise locating the first and second wrist-like linkages in a fixed position or configuration, or locating these in one of a plurality of available moveable positions or configurations.
It is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention disclosed are not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but are extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositional elements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary. In addition, various embodiments and example of the present invention may be referred to herein along with alternatives for the various components thereof. It is understood that such embodiments, examples, and alternatives are not to be construed as de facto equivalents of one another, but are to be considered as separate and autonomous representations of the present invention.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of lengths, widths, shapes, etc., to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
While the foregoing examples are illustrative of the principles of the present invention in one or more particular applications, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications in form, usage and details of implementation can be made without the exercise of inventive faculty, and without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the claims set forth below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
107874 | Appleby | Aug 1914 | A |
1112460 | Leavitt | Oct 1914 | A |
1515756 | Roy | Nov 1924 | A |
1975726 | Martinage | Oct 1934 | A |
2025999 | Myers | Dec 1935 | A |
2082920 | Aulmont | Jun 1937 | A |
2129557 | Beach | Sep 1938 | A |
2312072 | Broadwater | Mar 1940 | A |
2311475 | Schmeiser | Feb 1943 | A |
2329582 | Bishop | Sep 1943 | A |
2345763 | Mayne | Apr 1944 | A |
2701169 | Cannon | Feb 1955 | A |
2850147 | Hill | Sep 1958 | A |
2933143 | Robinson | Apr 1960 | A |
2967737 | Moore | Jan 1961 | A |
3037571 | Zelle | Jun 1962 | A |
3060972 | Sheldon | Oct 1962 | A |
3107643 | Edwards | Oct 1963 | A |
3166138 | Dunn, Jr. | Jan 1965 | A |
3190286 | Stokes | Jun 1965 | A |
3215219 | Forsyth | Nov 1965 | A |
3223462 | Dalrymple | Dec 1965 | A |
3266059 | Stelle | Aug 1966 | A |
3284964 | Saito | Nov 1966 | A |
3311424 | Taylor | Mar 1967 | A |
3362492 | Hansen | Jan 1968 | A |
3387896 | Sobota | Jun 1968 | A |
3489236 | Goodwin | Jan 1970 | A |
3497083 | Anderson | Feb 1970 | A |
3565198 | Ames | Feb 1971 | A |
3572325 | Bazell | Mar 1971 | A |
3609804 | Morrison | Oct 1971 | A |
3650343 | Helsell | Mar 1972 | A |
3700115 | Johnson | Oct 1972 | A |
3707218 | Payne | Dec 1972 | A |
3712481 | Harwood | Jan 1973 | A |
3715146 | Robertson | Feb 1973 | A |
3757635 | Hickerson | Sep 1973 | A |
3808078 | Snellman | Apr 1974 | A |
3820616 | Juergens | Jun 1974 | A |
3841424 | Purcell | Oct 1974 | A |
3864983 | Jacobsen | Feb 1975 | A |
3933214 | Guibord | Jan 1976 | A |
3934664 | Pohjola | Jan 1976 | A |
3974907 | Shaw | Aug 1976 | A |
4015553 | Meddleton | Apr 1977 | A |
4051914 | Pohjola | Oct 1977 | A |
4059315 | Jolliffe | Nov 1977 | A |
4068905 | Black et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4107948 | Maolaug | Aug 1978 | A |
4109971 | Black | Aug 1978 | A |
4132279 | Van der Lende | Jan 1979 | A |
4218101 | Thompson | Aug 1980 | A |
4260053 | Onodera | Apr 1981 | A |
4332317 | Bahre | Jun 1982 | A |
4332424 | Thompson | Jun 1982 | A |
4339031 | Densmore | Jul 1982 | A |
4393728 | Larson | Jul 1983 | A |
4396233 | Slaght | Aug 1983 | A |
4453611 | Stacy, Jr. | Jun 1984 | A |
4483407 | Iwamoto et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4489826 | Dubson | Dec 1984 | A |
4494417 | Larson | Jan 1985 | A |
4551061 | Olenick | Nov 1985 | A |
4589460 | Albee | May 1986 | A |
4621965 | Wilcock | Nov 1986 | A |
4636137 | Lemelson | Jan 1987 | A |
4646906 | Wilcox, Jr. | Mar 1987 | A |
4661039 | Brenhold | Apr 1987 | A |
4671774 | Owsen | Jun 1987 | A |
4700693 | Lia | Oct 1987 | A |
4706506 | Lestelle | Nov 1987 | A |
4712969 | Kimura | Dec 1987 | A |
4713896 | Jennens | Dec 1987 | A |
4714125 | Stacy, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4727949 | Rea et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4736826 | White et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4752105 | Barnard | Jun 1988 | A |
4756662 | Tanie | Jul 1988 | A |
4765795 | Rebman | Aug 1988 | A |
4784042 | Paynter | Nov 1988 | A |
4796607 | Allred, III | Jan 1989 | A |
4806066 | Rhodes | Feb 1989 | A |
4815319 | Clement | Mar 1989 | A |
4815911 | Bengtsson | Mar 1989 | A |
4818175 | Kimura | Apr 1989 | A |
4828339 | Thomas | May 1989 | A |
4848179 | Ubhayakar | Jul 1989 | A |
4862808 | Hedgecoxe | Sep 1989 | A |
4878451 | Siren | Nov 1989 | A |
4900218 | Sutherland | Feb 1990 | A |
4909341 | Rippingale | Mar 1990 | A |
4924153 | Toru et al. | May 1990 | A |
4932491 | Collins, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
4932831 | White et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936639 | Pohjola | Jun 1990 | A |
4997790 | Woo | Mar 1991 | A |
5018591 | Price | May 1991 | A |
5021798 | Ubhayakar | Jun 1991 | A |
5022812 | Coughlan | Jun 1991 | A |
5046914 | Holland et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5080000 | Bubic | Jan 1992 | A |
5130631 | Gordon | Jul 1992 | A |
5142932 | Moya | Sep 1992 | A |
5174168 | Takagi | Dec 1992 | A |
5174405 | Carra | Dec 1992 | A |
5186526 | Pennington | Feb 1993 | A |
5199771 | James | Apr 1993 | A |
5205612 | Sugden et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5214858 | Pepper | Jun 1993 | A |
5219264 | McClure et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5252870 | Jacobsen | Oct 1993 | A |
5297443 | Wentz | Mar 1994 | A |
5317952 | Immega | Jun 1994 | A |
5337732 | Grundfest | Aug 1994 | A |
5337846 | Ogaki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350033 | Kraft | Sep 1994 | A |
5354124 | James | Oct 1994 | A |
5363935 | Schempf et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5386741 | Rennex | Feb 1995 | A |
5413454 | Movsesian | May 1995 | A |
5426336 | Jacobsen | Jun 1995 | A |
5428713 | Matsumaru | Jun 1995 | A |
5435405 | Schempf | Jul 1995 | A |
5440916 | Stone et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443354 | Stone et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451135 | Schempf | Sep 1995 | A |
5465525 | Mifune | Nov 1995 | A |
5466056 | James | Nov 1995 | A |
5469756 | Feiten | Nov 1995 | A |
5516249 | Brimhall | May 1996 | A |
5519814 | Rodriguez et al. | May 1996 | A |
5551545 | Gelfman | Sep 1996 | A |
5556370 | Maynard | Sep 1996 | A |
5562843 | Yasumoto | Oct 1996 | A |
5567110 | Sutherland | Oct 1996 | A |
5570992 | Lemelson | Nov 1996 | A |
5573316 | Wankowski | Nov 1996 | A |
5588688 | Jacobsen | Dec 1996 | A |
5672044 | Lemelson | Sep 1997 | A |
5697285 | Nappi | Dec 1997 | A |
5712961 | Matsuo | Jan 1998 | A |
5749828 | Solomon | May 1998 | A |
5770913 | Mizzi | Jun 1998 | A |
5816769 | bauer | Oct 1998 | A |
5821666 | Matsumoto | Oct 1998 | A |
5842381 | Feiten | Dec 1998 | A |
RE36025 | Suzuki | Jan 1999 | E |
5878783 | Smart | Mar 1999 | A |
5888235 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902254 | Magram | May 1999 | A |
5906591 | Dario | May 1999 | A |
5984032 | Gremillion | Nov 1999 | A |
5996346 | Maynard | Dec 1999 | A |
6016385 | Yee | Jan 2000 | A |
6030057 | Fikse | Feb 2000 | A |
6056237 | Woodland | May 2000 | A |
6107795 | Smart | Aug 2000 | A |
6109705 | Courtemanche | Aug 2000 | A |
6113343 | Goldenberg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132133 | Muro et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138604 | Anderson | Oct 2000 | A |
6162171 | Ng | Dec 2000 | A |
6186604 | Fikse | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203126 | Harguth | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6260501 | Agnew | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263989 | Won | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264293 | Musselman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264294 | Musselman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281489 | Tubel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6323615 | Khairallah | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325749 | Inokuchi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333631 | Das et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339993 | Comello | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6380889 | Herrmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394204 | Haringer | May 2002 | B1 |
6405798 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408224 | Okamoto | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411055 | Fujita | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422509 | Yim | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430475 | Okamoto | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6431296 | Won | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446718 | Barrett et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450104 | Grant | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477444 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484083 | Hayward | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488306 | Shirey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505896 | Boivin | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512345 | Borenstein | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522950 | Conca et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523629 | Buttz | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529806 | Licht | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535793 | Allard | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540310 | Cartwright | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557954 | Hattori | May 2003 | B1 |
6563084 | Bandy | May 2003 | B1 |
6574958 | Macgregor | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6576406 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595812 | Haney | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610007 | Belson et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6619146 | Kerrebrock | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636781 | Shen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6651804 | Thomas | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652164 | Stiepel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6668951 | Won | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6708068 | Sakaue | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715575 | Karpik | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725128 | Hogg et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6772673 | Seto | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773327 | Felice | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774597 | Borenstein | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799815 | Krishnan | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6820653 | Schempf | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6831436 | Gonzalez | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6835173 | Couvillon, Jr. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837318 | Craig | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6840588 | Deland | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866671 | Tierney | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870343 | Borenstein | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889118 | Murray et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6917176 | Schempf | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923693 | Borgen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936003 | Iddan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6959231 | Maeda | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7020701 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7040426 | Berg | May 2006 | B1 |
7044245 | Anhalt et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7069124 | Whittaker et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7090637 | Dankitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137465 | Kerrebrock | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7144057 | Young et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7171279 | Buckingham et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188473 | Asada | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7188568 | Stout | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7228203 | Koselka et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235046 | Anhalt et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7331436 | Pack et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7387179 | Anhalt et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7415321 | Okazaki et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7475745 | DeRoos | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7546912 | Pack et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7597162 | Won | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7600592 | Goldenberg et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7645110 | Ogawa et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7654348 | Ohm et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7775312 | Maggio | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7798264 | Hutcheson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7843431 | Robbins et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845440 | Jacobsen | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7860614 | Reger | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7974736 | Morin et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8042630 | Jacobsen | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8162410 | Hirose et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8205695 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010037163 | Allard | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020038168 | Kasuga et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020128714 | Manasas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140392 | Borenstein | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020189871 | Won | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030000747 | Sugiyama | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069474 | Couvillon, Jr. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097080 | Esashi | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110938 | Seto | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030223844 | Schiele | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030571 | Solomon | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040099175 | Perrot et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103740 | Townsend | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040168837 | Michaud | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040216931 | Won | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040216932 | Giovanetti | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050007055 | Borenstein | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027412 | Hobson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085693 | Belson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107669 | Couvillon, Jr. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115337 | Tarumi | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166413 | Crampton | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050168068 | Courtemanche et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050168070 | Dandurand | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050225162 | Gibbins | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235898 | Hobson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235899 | Yamamoto | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050288819 | de Guzman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000137 | Valdivia y Alvarado | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060005733 | Rastegar | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010702 | Roth | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060070775 | Anhalt | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060117324 | Alsafadi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156851 | Jacobsen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060225928 | Nelson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229773 | Peretz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060290779 | Reverte et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070029117 | Goldenberg et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070156286 | Yamauchi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070193790 | Goldenberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070260378 | Clodfelter | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070293989 | Norris | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080115687 | Gal et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080164079 | Jacobsen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167752 | Jacobsen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168070 | Naphade | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215185 | Jacobsen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080272647 | Hirose et al. | Nov 2008 | A9 |
20080284244 | Hirose et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090035097 | Loane | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090171151 | Choset et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212157 | Arlton et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100030377 | Unsworth | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036544 | Mashiach | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100258365 | Jacobsen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268470 | Kamal et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100318242 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120205168 | Flynn et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2512299 | Sep 2004 | CA |
1603068 | Apr 2005 | CN |
2774717 | Apr 2006 | CN |
1970373 | May 2007 | CN |
3025840 | Feb 1982 | DE |
3626238 | Feb 1988 | DE |
19617852 | Oct 1997 | DE |
19714464 | Oct 1997 | DE |
19704080 | Aug 1998 | DE |
10018075 | Jan 2001 | DE |
102004010089 | Sep 2005 | DE |
0105418 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0584520 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0818283 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0924034 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1444043 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1510896 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1832501 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1832502 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2638813 | May 1990 | FR |
2850350 | Jul 2004 | FR |
1199729 | Jul 1970 | GB |
51-106391 | Aug 1976 | JP |
52 57625 | May 1977 | JP |
HEI 52-122431 | Oct 1977 | JP |
58-89480 | May 1983 | JP |
SHO 58-80387 | May 1983 | JP |
HEI 59-139494 | Aug 1984 | JP |
60015275 | Jan 1985 | JP |
60047771 | Mar 1985 | JP |
60060516 | Apr 1985 | JP |
60139576 | Jul 1985 | JP |
61001581 | Jan 1986 | JP |
SHO 61-1581 | Jan 1986 | JP |
SHO61-020484 | Feb 1986 | JP |
SHO61-054378 | Mar 1986 | JP |
SHO61-075069 | Apr 1986 | JP |
61089182 | May 1986 | JP |
62165207 | Jul 1987 | JP |
62-162626 | Oct 1987 | JP |
SHO 63-32084 | Mar 1988 | JP |
63306988 | Dec 1988 | JP |
04092784 | Mar 1992 | JP |
4126656 | Apr 1992 | JP |
HEI 5-3087 | Jan 1993 | JP |
05147560 | Jun 1993 | JP |
HEI05-270454 | Oct 1993 | JP |
HEI 5-286460 | Nov 1993 | JP |
06-115465 | Apr 1994 | JP |
HEI 8-133141 | Nov 1994 | JP |
2007-216936 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7329841 | Dec 1995 | JP |
HEI 7-329837 | Dec 1995 | JP |
HEI 9-142347 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2003-237618 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003-019985 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-315486 | Nov 2003 | JP |
03535508 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004536634 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-081447 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005111595 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006510496 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2007-237991 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO 8702635 | May 1987 | WO |
WO9726039 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 0010073 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 200010073 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO0216995 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 02095517 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03030727 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03037515 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2004056537 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2005018428 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2006068080 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2008049050 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO2008076194 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008135978 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2009009673 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,146, filed Jul. 10, 2008; Stephen C. Jacobsen; office action dated Aug. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,380, filed Jul. 12, 2011; Stephen C. Jacobsen; office action dated Jul. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,302, filed Jun. 11, 2010; Stephen C. Jacobsen; notice of allowance dated Jul. 25, 2012. |
Arnold, Henry, “Cricket the robot documentation.” online manual available at http://www.parallaxinc.com, 22 pages. |
Iagnemma, Karl et al., “Traction control of wheeled robotic vehicles in rough terrain with application to planetary rovers.” International Journal of Robotics Research, Oct.-Nov. 2004, pp. 1029-1040, vol. 23, No. 10-11. |
Hirose, et al., “Snakes and strings; new robotic components for rescue operations,” International Journal of Robotics Research, Apr.-May 2004, pp. 341-349, vol. 23, No. 4-5. |
Paap et al., “A robot snake to inspect broken buildings,” IEEE, 2000, pp. 2079-2082, Japan. |
Braure, Jerome, “Participation to the construction of a salamander robot: exploration of the morphological configuration and the locomotion controller”, Biologically Inspired Robotics Group, master thesis, Feb. 17, 2004, pp. 1-46. |
Jacobsen, et al., Advanced intelligent mechanical sensors (AIMS), Proc. IEEE Trandsucers, Jun. 24-27, 1991, abstract only, San Fransico, CA. |
Jacobsen, et al., “Research robots for applications in artificial intelligence, teleoperation and entertainment”, International Journal of Robotics Research, 2004, pp. 319-330, vol. 23. |
Jacobsen, et al., “Multiregime MEMS sensor networks for smart structures,” Procs. SPIE 6th Annual Inter. Conf. on Smart Structues and Materials, Mar. 1-5, 1999, pp. 19-32, vol. 3673, Newport Beach CA. |
MacLean et al., “A digital MEMS-based strain gage for structural health monitoring,” Procs. 1997 MRS Fall Meeting Symposium, Nov. 30-Dec. 4, 1997, pp. 309-320, Boston Massachusetts. |
Berlin et al., “MEMS-based control of structural dynamic instability”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Jul. 1998 pp. 574-586, vol. 9. |
Goldfarb, “Design and energetic characterization of a liquid-propellant-powered actuator for self-powered robots,” IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, Jun. 2003, vol. 8 No. 2. |
Dowling, “Limbless Locomotion: Learning to crawl with a snake robot,” The Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, Dec. 1997, pp. 1-150. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,320, filed Nov. 13, 2007; published as US-2008-0215185; published Sep. 4, 2008; issued as patent No. 7,845,440 on Dec. 7, 2010. |
Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,346, filed Nov. 13, 2007; published as US-2008-0136254 on Jun. 12, 2008. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,324, filed Nov. 13, 2007; published as US-2008-0217993-A1; published Sep. 11, 2008; Aug. 28, 2011 as 8,002,365; issued as patent No. 8,002,365 on Aug. 23, 2011. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,323, filed Nov. 13, 2007; published as US-2008-0164079 on Jul. 10, 2008; issued as patent No. 7,845,440 on Dec. 7, 2010. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,144, filed Jul. 10, 2008; published as US-2009-0025988 on Jan. 29, 2009; issued Jul. 10, 2011 as 7,845,440. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 12/171,146, filed Jul. 10, 2008; published as US-2009-0030562 on Jan. 29, 2009. |
Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 12/151,730, filed May 7, 2008; published as US-2008-0281231 on Nov. 13, 2008; issued Aug. 13, 2011 as 8,002,716. |
Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 12/117,233, filed May 8, 2008; published as US-2008-0281468-A1on Nov. 13, 2008. |
Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 11/293,701, filed Dec. 1, 2005; published as US-2006-0156851-Alon Jul. 20, 2006. |
Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,336, filed Nov. 13, 2007; published as US-2008-0167752-Alon Jul. 10, 2008; issued as patent 8,185,241 on May 22, 2012. |
Jacobsen, Stephen, U.S. Appl. No. 12/350,693, filed Jan. 8, 2009; published as US-2010-0174422-A1on Jul. 8, 2010. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,996, filed Jan. 27, 2010; published as US-2010-0201187 on Jul. 12, 2010. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,302, filed Jun. 11, 2010; published as US2010-0317244 on Dec. 16, 2010. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,304; filed Jun. 11, 2010; published as US-2010-0318242 on Dec. 16, 2010. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 12/820,881, filed Apr. 22, 2010; published as US-2010-0201185 on Aug. 12, 2010; issued as patent No. 8,042,630 on Oct. 25, 2011. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 12/765,618, filed Apr. 22, 2010; published as US-2010-0201185-A1on Aug. 12, 2010. |
Matthew Heverly & Jaret Matthews: “A wheel-on-limb rover for lunar operation” Internet article, Nov. 5, 2008, pp. 1-8, http://robotics.estec.esa.int/i-SAIRAS/isairas2008/Proceedings/SESSION%2026/m116-Heverly.pdf. |
NASA: “NASA's newest concept vehicles take off-roading out of this world” Internet article, Nov. 5, 2008, http://www.nasa.gov/mission—pages/constellation/main/lunar—truck.html. |
Revue Internationale De defense, “3-D vision and urchin” Oct. 1, 1988, p. 1292, vol. 21, No. 10, Geneve CH. |
Advertisement, International Defense review, Jane's information group, Nov. 1, 1990, p. 54, vol. 23, No. 11, Great Britain. |
Ren Luo “Development of a multibehavior-based mobile robot for remote supervisory control through the internet” IEEE/ASME Transactions on mechatronics, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NY, Dec. 1, 2000, vol. 5, No. 4. |
Nilas Sueset et al., “A PDA-based high-level human-robot interaction” Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, IEEE Conference Singapore, Dec. 1-3, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 1158-1163. |
Jacobsen, Stephen; U.S. Appl. No. 13/181,380, filed Jul. 12, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,304, filed Jun. 11, 2010; Stephen C. Jacobsen; office action dated Nov. 13, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/117,233, filed May 8, 2008; Stephen C. Jacobsen. office action dated Nov. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/350,693, filed Jan. 8, 2009; Stephen C. Jacobsen; Notice of Allowance issued Sep. 20, 2012. |
Celaya et al; Control of a Six-Legged Robot Walking on Abrupt Terrain; Proceedings of the 1996 IEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Apr. 1996; 6 pages. |
Burg et al; Anti-Lock Braking and Traction Control Concept for All-Terrain Robotic Vehicles; Proceedings of the 1997 IEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Apr. 1997; 6 pages. |