SHADING NOISE FILTER

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20070165963
  • Publication Number
    20070165963
  • Date Filed
    January 30, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    July 19, 2007
    16 years ago
Abstract
A shading correction is employed for a scanner to correct shading distortion. However, an image corrected with the shading corrective curve has shading noise lines due to the effects of various factors in the producing process of the shading corrective curve. The characteristic of the shading noise is that the each value of any primary color channel, of each pixel in a line is higher or lower than of the adjacent two pixels in other lines, wherein a color channel is one of red, green, or blue channel. Hence, the quality of the image is improved by removing the shading noise detected from the characteristic described above.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates to image editing, and more particularly to correcting shading noise.


2. Description of the Prior Art


In general, a scanning process of a scanner includes: moving a light source and a scanning module along a scanning direction by means of a stepper motor. Then, the light source illuminates the material of demand and is reflected into the scanning module. An: image is captured by a light sensor such as CCD (Charge-Coupled Device) and is then translated into digital data to be saved.


The digital data of the image is different from the captured data with the fight sensor, due to the light provided by the light source not being an ideal linear light. and the brightness varying along a direction of the arrangement of the light sensor. The brightness is approximately brighter in the center of the light than in the edge thereof, as shown in FIG. 1A. Therefore, the captured image is brighter in the center of the image than in the edge thereof due to a disproportionate brightness of the light source. In general, the brightness distribution of the light is pre-scanned and the captured data is efficiently corrected through use of the pre-scanned data, as shown in FIG. 1A.


Furthermore, a light sensor is a plurality of CCDs arranged in a line and the data detected by different CCDs is different due to each CCD having a different light sensitivity. Moreover, external factors may vary with time, for example: the variant of light resulting from a power supply varying with time, the variant in the light sensitivity of the CCD with time, etc. These factors are generally called “shading distortion”. Therefore, the data of the image is corrected for the elimination of the disproportionate distribution of the light, but the corrected data still has a problem of being uneven, resulting from the shading noise, as shown in FIG. 1B.


The corrective method of the shading distortion is that the scanner pre-scans a reference white (a white corrective board) or a reference black (covering with the light sensor before capturing image). The data of the reference white or the reference black is the shading distortion corrective curve. Hence, a captured image can be corrected with the corrective curve to obtain a more corrective image data.


Nevertheless, the shading distortion corrective curve has local maximums or local minimums resulting from the noise of the electrical devices, bad CCDs, or inexact deductive methods. The local maximums or minimums resulting from random noise do not appear every time. The inexact deductive method causes the data to be improperly corrected. These results are generally called “shading noise”. If the image data is corrected by a corrective curve that comprises shading noise, the resultant corrected image has some shading noise lines. The shading noise lines in the corrected image are caused by the shading corrective curve. While the shading corrective curve may be one dimensional, the shading noise that appears in the resultant corrected image appears as lines in a two-dimensional image in positions correlating to the shading distortions in the corrective curve.


Hence, the shading corrective curve in the conventional arts can correct the problem of shading distortion, but they easily generate problems with shading noise and reduce the quality of the image.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The conventional arts mentioned above can correct the shading distortion, but generates the problem of the shading noise. In accordance with the present invention, image editing may be used for correcting the shading noise to efficiently improve the problem of the shading noise resulting from the correction of the shading distortion.


It is another object of this invention to employ image editing to correct the shading noise for increasing the image quality.


In accordance with the above-mentioned objects, the present invention provides image editing for correcting the shading noise. In the present invention, it detects the shading noise by means of characteristics of the shading noise, and eliminates the shading noise for an increased image quality.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a diagram of the disproportionate brightness in a general scanner;



FIG. 1B is a diagram of an image with uneven brightness result from shading noises;



FIG. 2 is a flow chart of eliminating shading noises; and



FIG. 3 is a flow chart of mathematical calculation of a shading noise function.



FIG. 4A to FIG. 4B is a flow chart of mathematical calculation of a shading noise function.




DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Some sample embodiments of the invention will now be described in greater detail. Nevertheless, it should be recognized that the present invention can be practiced in a wide range of other embodiments besides those explicitly described, and the scope of the present invention is expressly not limited except as specified in the accompanying claims.


The process of obtaining the shading distortion corrective curve includes measurement with three primary colors RGB (red, green, and blue), respectively. Therefore, the characteristic of the shading noise is a line of one pixel width with one certain primary color in an image. The primary values in the pixels of the lines are lower or higher, than one preselected percentage of pixels (such as one certain percent, for example) of the color values of the primary color, within the two adjacent pixels in the adjacent lines. Therefore, the shading noise of an image can be detected and eliminated by means of the characteristic of the shading noise. The steps of eliminating shading noise are: start, detecting shading noise, eliminating shading noise, and end, as shown in FIG. 2. The characteristic is that one certain color value of the primary color of the pixels with shading noise is higher or lower than the color value of the same primary color of two adjacent pixels. Hence, the detecting function is:

X(i)>Max[X(i−1),X(i+1)]
or
X(i)<Min[X(i−1),X(i+1)]


wherein X(n) is the nth color value of one certain primary color.


Eq.(1) can be rewritten

[X(i−1)−X(i)][X(i)−X(i+1)]<0  (2)


If the ith pixel of the corrective curve has a shading noise in one certain primary color, the inage of two-dimension M×N corrected writh the corrective line. has a shading noise line ((ij), j=1 to N). Therefore, Eq. (2) in one-dimension can be rewritten to translate into Eq. (3) in two-dimension:

[X(i−1,J)−X(i,j)][X(i+1,j)]<0  (3)

wherein x(ij) is a color value of one certain primary color and i is one certain value among 1 to M ,j=1 to N.


If the Eq. (3) is true dunig j=1 to N, the line of (i,j) j=1 to N) is a shading shading noise line. The primary color values with shading noise of the ith line ansforms into the average of two adjacent same primary color values in adjacent lines for correcting the shading noise.

Xn(i,j)=[X(i−1,j)+X(i+1,j)]/2  (4)


wherein the Xn(i,j) is a new connected color value of (i,j) and j is 1 to N.


If the Eq. (3) is not true during j=1 to N, the line of (i,j: j=1 to N) is not a shading noise line and the color value in the lie is not corrected.

Xn(i,j)=X(i,j)  (5)


wherein j is 1 to N.


Referring to FIG. 3, a flow chart of mathematical calculation of a shading noise function is illustrated. Wherein, the block 20a to 20f is the detecting step; the block 22 is the correcting step; and the block 24 is the not correcting step.


Regarding an image where the color or brightness greatly varies, the variant of the color or brightness may be larger than the variant of the shading noise. Therefore, Eq. (3) may be not true during j=1 to N. Accordingly, if more than one certain percent (e.g. 80%) thereof during j=1 to N is true, the color value may be corrected with Eq. (4). The value of the one certain percent can be determined according to different conditions. Referring to FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B, compared with FIG. 3B, the block 26, block 28a-28f, and block 30 are added. The block 26 includes setting a counter to 0; the block 28a-28f includes adding 1 to the counter; and the block 30 includes detecting a ratio of the counter value and N. If the ratio of the counter value and N is bigger than a predetermined ratio then the block 22 is performed; if not, then the block 24 is performed.


Although the present invention has been described in its preferred embodiment, it is not intended to limit the invention to the precise embodiment disclosed herein. Those who are skilled in this technology can still make various alterations and modifications without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention. Therefore, the scope of the present invention shall be defined and protected by the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1-20. (canceled)
  • 21. A method, comprising: detecting shading noise in a given line of an image based at least in part on at least a portion of a first line adjacent said given line and at least a portion of a second line adjacent the given line.
  • 22. The method according to claim 21, further comprising eliminating said shading noise from said given line in said image, and wherein said detecting shading noise comprises detecting shading noise by a characteristic of said shading noise.
  • 23. The method according to claim 22, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being higher than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines.
  • 24. The method according to claim 22, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being higher than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 25. The method according to claim 22, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being lower than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines.
  • 26. The method according to claim 22, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being lower than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 27. The method according to claim 22, wherein said detecting shading noise comprises a detecting function comprising multiplying differences taken between a pixel of said given line and two adjacent pixels of said first and second adjacent lines, and wherein a resulting sign of the multiplication of the differences indicates whether there is shading noise.
  • 28. The method according to claim 27, wherein the given line has shading noise if a detecting result of said detecting function is true for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 29. The method according to claim 28, wherein said preselected percentage comprises 80 percent.
  • 30. The method according to claim 23, wherein said color value is red, green, or blue.
  • 31. The method according to claim 24, wherein said color value is red, green, or blue.
  • 32. The method according to claim 22, wherein said shading noises are detected by multiplying a first difference with a second difference, wherein the first difference is taken between a color value of a first adjacent pixel and a color value of a given pixel, and wherein the second difference is taken between a color value of a second adjacent pixel and said color value of said given pixel.
  • 33. The method according to claim 32, wherein a new color value of said given pixel comprises an average of said color value of said first adjacent pixel and said color value of said second adjacent pixel for eliminating said shading noise.
  • 34. The method according to claim 32, wherein said color value of said given pixel is not corrected if detecting shading noise is false.
  • 35. A method, comprising: detecting a shading noise in an image by multiplying a first difference with a second difference, wherein the first difference is taken between color values of a first adjacent pixel and a color value of a given pixel of a given line, and wherein the second difference is taken between a color value of a second adjacent pixel and said color value of said given pixel; and eliminating said shading noise from said given line in said image.
  • 36. The method according to claim 35, wherein a resulting sign of the multiplication of the first difference with the second difference indicates whether there is shading noise.
  • 37. The method according to claim 36, wherein a line in said image has shading noise if a detecting result of said detecting function is true for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 38. The method according to claim 37, wherein preselected percentage of pixels comprises 80 percent.
  • 39. The method according to claim 35, wherein a new color value of said given pixel comprises an average of said color value of said first adjacent pixel and said color value of said second adjacent pixel for eliminating said shading noise.
  • 40. The method according to claim 35, wherein said color value of said given pixel is not corrected if detecting shading noise is false.
  • 41. An apparatus, comprising: means for detecting shading noise in a given line of an image based at least in part on at least a portion of a first line adjacent said given line and at least a portion of a second line adjacent the given line; and means for eliminating said shading noise from said given line in said image.
  • 42. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein said means for detecting shading noise comprises means for detecting shading noise by a characteristic of said shading noise.
  • 43. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being higher than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines.
  • 44. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being higher than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 45. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being lower than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines.
  • 46. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being lower than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 47. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein said means for detecting shading noise comprises a detecting function comprising multiplying differences taken between a pixel of said given line and two adjacent pixels of said first and second adjacent, and wherein a resulting sign of the multiplication of the differences indicates whether there is shading noise.
  • 48. The apparatus of claim 47, wherein a line in said image has shading noise if a detecting result of said detecting function is true for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 49. The apparatus of claim 48, wherein said preselected percentage of pixels comprises 80 percent.
  • 50. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein said means for detecting shading noise comprises means for detecting shading noise by multiplying a first difference with a second difference, wherein the first difference is taken between a color value of a first adjacent pixel and a color value of a given pixel, and wherein the second difference is taken between a color value of a second adjacent pixel and said color value of said given pixel.
  • 51. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein a new color value of said given pixel comprises an average of said color value of said first adjacent pixel and said color value of said second adjacent pixel for eliminating said shading noise.
  • 52. The apparatus of claim 50, wherein said color value of said given pixel is not corrected if detecting shading noise is false.
  • 53. An apparatus, comprising: a scanner, said scanner capable of: detecting a shading noise in an image by multiplying a first difference with a second difference, wherein the first difference is taken between color values of a first adjacent pixel and a color value of a given pixel in a. given line, and wherein the second difference is taken between a color value of a second adjacent pixel and said color value of said given pixel; and eliminating said shading noise from said given line in said image.
  • 54. The apparatus of claim 53, wherein said scanner is further capable of detecting a shading noise by a detecting function of said shading noise comprising: taking a resulting sign of the multiplication of the first difference with the second difference as an indication of whether there is shading noise.
  • 55. The apparatus of claim 54, wherein a line in said image has shading noise if a detecting result of said detecting function is true for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 56. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein said preselected percentage of pixels comprises 80 percent.
  • 57. The apparatus of claim 53, wherein a new color value of said given pixel comprises an average of said color value of said first adjacent pixel and said color value of said second adjacent pixel for eliminating said shading noise.
  • 58. The apparatus of claim 53, wherein said color value of said given pixel is not corrected if detecting shading noise is false.
  • 59. An article comprising: a storage medium having stored thereon instructions, that, if executed, result in of a method comprising: detecting shading noise in a given line of an image based at least in part on at least a portion of a first line adjacent said given line and at least a portion of a second line adjacent the given line.
  • 60. The article of claim 59, wherein the instructions, if executed, further result in eliminating said shading noise from said given line in said image, and wherein said detecting shading noise comprises detecting shading noise by a characteristic of said shading noise.
  • 61. The article of claim 60, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being higher than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines.
  • 62. The article of claim 60, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being higher than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 63. The article of claim 60, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being lower than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines.
  • 64. The article of claim 60, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being lower than that of two adjacent pixels in said first and second adjacent lines for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 65. The article of claim 60, wherein said detecting shading noise comprises a detecting function comprising multiplying differences taken between a pixel of said given line and two adjacent pixels of said first and second adjacent lines, and wherein a resulting sign of the multiplication of the differences indicates whether there is shading noise.
  • 66. The article of claim 65, wherein the given line has shading noise if a detecting result of said detecting function is true for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 67. The article of claim 66, wherein said preselected percentage comprises 80 percent.
  • 68. The article of claim 60, wherein said shading noises are detected by multiplying a first difference with a second difference, wherein the first difference is taken between a color value of a first adjacent pixel and a color value of a given pixel, and wherein the second difference is taken between a color value of a second adjacent pixel and said color value of said given pixel.
  • 69. The article of claim 68, wherein a new color value of said given pixel comprises an average of said color value of said first adjacent pixel and said color value of said second adjacent pixel for eliminating said shading noise.
  • 70. The article of claim 68, wherein said color value of said given pixel is not corrected if detecting shading noise is false.
  • 71. An article comprising: a storage medium having stored thereon instructions, that, if executed, result in of a method comprising: detecting a shading noise in an image by multiplying a first difference with a second difference, wherein the first difference is taken between color values of a first adjacent pixel and a color value of a given,pixel of a given line, and wherein the second difference is taken between a color value of a second adjacent pixel and said color value of said given pixel; and eliminating said shading noise from said given line in said image.
  • 72. The article of claim 71, wherein a resulting sign of the multiplication of the first difference with the second difference indicates whether there is shading noise.
  • 73. The article of claim 72, wherein a line in said image has shading noise if a detecting result of said detecting function is true for at least a preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 74. The article of claim 73, wherein preselected percentage of pixels comprises 80 percent.
  • 75. The article of claim 71, wherein a new color value of said given pixel comprises an average of said color value of said first adjacent pixel and said color value of said second adjacent pixel for eliminating said shading noise.
  • 76. The article of claim 71, wherein said color value of said given pixel is not corrected if detecting shading noise is false.
  • 77. A method, comprising: detecting shading noise in a given line of an image based at least in part on at least a portion of a first line adjacent said given line, wherein said detecting is based at least in part on a threshold of a preselected percentage of pixels in said given line; and eliminating said shading noise from said given line in said image.
  • 78. The method according to claim 77, wherein said detecting shading noise comprises detecting shading noise by a characteristic of said shading noise.
  • 79. The method according to claim 78, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being higher than that of at least an adjacent pixel in said first adjacent line for at least the preselected percentage of pixels.
  • 80. The method according to claim 78, wherein said characteristic comprises a color value of a pixel in the given line being lower than that of at least an adjacent pixel in said first adjacent line for at least the preselected percentage of pixels.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/320,681, filed Dec. 17, 2002. The entire disclosure of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/320,681 is considered as being part of the disclosure of the present application and is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10320681 Dec 2002 US
Child 11668960 Jan 2007 US