Not applicable
Not applicable
The present invention generally relates to returnable shipping containers, and more specifically to returnable shipping containers having drop down doors to permit access to goods contained in such containers.
For many years, industries dealing in bulk goods have utilized returnable containers. Such containers typically have one or more drop-down doors located in the sidewalls of the container to permit operators easy access to the interior of the container to load goods into or unload goods from the container. Such drop-down doors are typically hinged at the bottom and held in an upright position using a pair of latches located on the vertical sides of the door. Frequently the mating hinge knuckles are formed integrally with the container sidewall and the drop-down door. A hinge pin is then inserted to bear the load of the door and to establish the axis of rotation.
In practice, operators will frequently unlatch the door and then allow it to freely rotate to its open position. This practice can, however, lead to injuries to the operator if the hinges are not properly installed or assembled or if the hinges fail. In such cases, the door can freely fall to the floor, possibly causing injury to the operator. Such issues may not be obvious to an operator in advance, however, because a door installed in its upright, closed position will typically rest on the sidewall and have a lip or similar feature along its bottom portion that impinges on the inside of the sidewall to assist in bearing the load of the goods loaded in the container. Thus, a hinge issue is unlikely to be noticed in a door that is latched in its upright position because the latches and the lip cooperate to keep the door in place.
Previous attempts to address this issue have involved the use of a flexible safety tether in an attempt to keep door 50 from falling freely to the floor. The use of tethers, however, creates other issues that are not conducive to an efficient and safe workplace. For example, if the tether is located on the inside of the container, it can become tangled in the goods. And if the tether hangs on the outside of a container, it can be become tangled with other containers, which can create a hazard, especially where containers are stacked on top of one another in tight stacks. The productivity of operators can also be impacted by tethers since such tethers can get in the way of operators as they load and unload containers.
What is needed then is a returnable bulk container with a mechanism to prevent a drop-down side door from separating from the container in the case of a hinge failure that does not involve the use of a tether.
The present invention relates to a reusable shipping container having a safety catch to keep a drop down door connected to said container if the door's hinges were to fail.
For a further understanding of the nature, objects, and advantages of the present invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description, read in conjunction with the attached figures, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements.
The present invention is a shipping container for bulk goods. Container 1 comprises rectangular base, sidewalls 40, and one or more door 50. Door 50 is hinged at its bottom to allow easy access to the goods contained in container 1, and known container designs use many known hinge designs. In the illustrated embodiment of container 1, door 50 includes two hinges 52. Each hinge 52 comprises alternating knuckles 54 that are formed integrally with sidewall 40 and door 50. A hinge pin is inserted through alternating knuckles 54 to rotatably affix door 50 to sidewall 40. Door 50 also includes latches to affix door 50 in its upright position.
As discussed above, hinges used with drop downs doors on containers are a frequent failure point. Examples of such failures include, missing hinge pins (which can result from an assembly error or due to vibration during transportation), broken knuckles, and, in the case of non-integral hinges, the failure of the connection of hinges 52 to sidewall 40 or to door 50. Such failures are problematic because, as discussed above, even if the hinge or hinges have failed, the door will remain in its upright position due to latches 58 and the fact that the lower portion of door 50 rests on sidewall 40. Thus, if there is an undetected hinge failure, when an operator releases latches 58 and allows door 50 to freely rotate toward is open position, door 50 may separate from container 1 and fall freely to the floor, often causing foot or toe injuries to the operator.
To address this issue, container 1 further comprises safety catch 100. Safety catch 100 is configured to allow door 50 to freely rotate on hinges 52 while bearing no load (though safety catch 100 may bear some hydraulic load when door 50 is in its upright position and container 1 is loaded). Safety catch 100 also avoids the issues that arise with the use of a tethered restraint system. Safety catch 100 comprises sidewall portion 110, which is interconnected with or integral to sidewall 40 and door portion 130 that is interconnected with or integral to door 50.
Sidewall portion 110 of safety catch 100 (best seen in
Door portion 130 of safety catch 100 (best seen in
Extending from rear wall 134 are parallel walls 136, which are spaced apart the diameter of pin 114 to form slot 140 to receive pin 114. The closed end of slot 140 is formed by semi-circular wall 138. This configuration is best seen in
Once safety catch 100 is engaged, door 50 is further connected to sidewall 40 using hinges 52. In the event of a failure of hinges 52, safety catch 100 will ensure that door 50 will remain attached to sidewall 40 when door 50 is unlatched and allowed to freely rotate to its open position.
The foregoing described embodiments are exemplary in nature and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
This continuation patent application claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/785,766, filed on Oct. 20, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,731,864, which is a National Stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT Patent Application Number PCT/US14/37660, filed on May 12, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/822,633 filed on May 13, 2013, all of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5094356 | Miller | Mar 1992 | A |
6209742 | Overholt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
7287661 | Knutsson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
8052000 | Apps | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066143 | Baltz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8727165 | Nolan | May 2014 | B2 |
9731864 | Turner | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20040238400 | Knutsson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060260976 | Apps | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090044376 | Nolan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110215105 | Dubois et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
672015 | Sep 1996 | AU |
102008004520 | Jun 2009 | DE |
2006298430 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2010202272 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2012140941 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
The United Patent and Trademark Office; The International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2014/037660; Search Report and Written Opinion; dated Sep. 9, 2014; pp. 1-15; The United States Patent and Trademark Office; U.S.A. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170305597 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61822633 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14785766 | US | |
Child | 15643918 | US |