The invention generally relates to methods and devices for treatment of the ear, which may be supplemental to a tympanocentesis procedure.
Middle ear infections are common in young children. Suffering may be alleviated by puncturing the tympanic membrane to evacuate the fluid, a treatment known as tympanocentesis. The patient may undergo general anesthesia prior to a tympanocentesis procedure, but this is not preferred due to cost and health concerns. As a preferable alternative, the tympanic membrane can be locally anesthetized with an iontophoresis procedure. Thus, the patient may be treated while awake. Devices and methods for locally anesthetizing the tympanic membrane are disclosed in co-assigned patent application U.S. Ser. No. 11/962,063 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,192,420), U.S. Ser. No. 11/749,729 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,387,124), and U.S. 61/085,360, the entireties of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Fluid in the middle ear is commonly known as serous otitis media or “effusion”. Effusion is normally drained through the tympanocentesis procedure. However, effusion may thicken and thus be difficult to remove or drain. Thickening of effusion is common with patients who suffer from chronic ear infections. Accordingly, a tympanocentesis procedure may not be effective in patients with lodged or thickened effusion.
Tympanocentesis procedures, which implement iontophoresis, often require iontophoresis fluid to be evacuated before the tympanic membrane is punctured. Evacuation of fluid is commonly performed through low pressure suction via a syringe or suction cannula. Fluid evacuation is often a painful and uncomfortable process because large amounts of noise are created by fluid cavitation. Thus, fluid evacuation by suction may cause pain and emotional discomfort which may prevent the completion of the tympanocentesis procedure. It should be noted that many patients are young, 5 and under, and also have endured many hours or days of a painful ear infection, and thus may be uncooperative and difficult to treat. Fluid may also be removed by swabbing the ear with an absorbent material, however this can be irritating to the patient and ineffective as well. Swabbing also requires the patient to vigorously shake their head side to side, which many young patients refuse to comply with.
One embodiment of the invention may include a method for clearing effusion from an ear. The method may include applying liquid to an ear canal, which is proximal to a perforated tympanic membrane, which is proximal to a middle ear containing effusion. The perforated tympanic membrane may have been intentionally perforated in a prior tympanocentesis procedure. The effusion may not have been removed by the normal tympanocentesis procedure. The method may also include applying an ear device to seal and pressurize the liquid inside the ear canal, the ear device regulating the amount of pressure inside the ear canal. The method may also include inducing a Eustachian tube, which is distal to the middle ear, to open, which causes the fluid to displace the effusion into the Eustachian tube.
Another aspect of the invention may include a method for clearing effusion from an ear, the method including applying an ear device to seal an ear canal, which is proximal to a perforated tympanic membrane, which is proximal to a middle ear containing effusion. The method may also include pressurizing the ear canal with air, and inducing a Eustachian tube, which is distal to the middle ear, to open, which causes the pressurized air to displace the effusion into the Eustachian tube.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a device for pressurizing an ear canal, the device including a first ear cup which encloses a first external ear, the first ear cup having a first sealing member which fluidly seals around the first external ear, the first ear cup having a first port which is in fluid communication with the sealed first external ear. The device may also include a second ear cup which encloses a second external ear, the second ear cup having a second sealing member which fluidly seals around the second external ear, the second ear cup having a second port which is in fluid communication with the sealed second external ear. A headpiece may connect to each ear cup, the headpiece being configured for applying sealing pressure to each sealing member and retaining each ear cup on each respective external ear.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a method for clearing liquid from an ear canal, the method including applying a device including a wicking tip to a liquid solution inside an ear canal to wick the liquid from the ear canal. The liquid may be left from a iontophoresis procedure. The method may also include applying negative pressure to the device to aid in wicking the liquid, wherein the wicking tip regulates turbulence to reduce noise caused by wicking the liquid.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a device for clearing liquid from an ear canal, the device including an elongated cannula including a first end and a second end. The device may also include an elongated foam member including a distal end and a proximal end, a portion of the elongated foam member compressed within the cannula, the distal end uncompressed and exposed past the first end, the proximal end uncompressed and exposed past the second end, wherein the proximal end is larger than the distal end to provide a wicking action to the distal end, and wherein the proximal end will enlarge when fluid is wicked from the distal end into the proximal end.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a device for silently removing liquid from an ear canal, the device including an elongated multi-lumen cannula including a distal end and a proximal end, wherein each lumen includes a cross-sectional area which reduces cavitation during suction. A suction apparatus may be coupled to the proximal end of the multi-lumen cannula.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a method for removing liquid from an ear canal, the method including receiving a trigger to apply suction to a device in an ear canal filled with liquid, the device including a lumen for removing the liquid. Suction may be applied to the device. The method may also include monitoring an electrical signal from the device. The method may also include detecting an imminent creation of noise, or noise, caused by the suction; and reducing suction until the imminence of noise, or noise, subsides.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a system for removing liquid from an ear canal. The system may include a suction probe, which includes at least one noise sensor. A pressure regulator may be coupled to the suction probe, the pressure regulator being configured to supply negative pressure to the suction probe. A processor may also be electrically coupled to the at least one noise sensor and pressure regulator, the processor being configured to detect, based on signals from the at least one noise sensor, imminent creation of noise, or noise, caused by the suction probe, the processor being further configured to modify pressure supplied by the pressure regulator based on the signals.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a device for silently removing liquid from an ear canal. The device may include an elongated cannula. Filtering material may be disposed within the cannula. A portion of the filtering material may be extended out of an end of the elongated cannula.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a method for silently removing effusion from a middle ear. A tympanostomy tube including a central lumen may be implanted into a tympanic membrane. A device having an Archmides' screw may be inserted into the central lumen. The Archmides' screw may be actuated to remove effusion lodged adjacent to the tympanic membrane.
Yet another aspect of the invention may include a system for silently removing effusion from a middle ear. The system may include a tympanostomy tube including a central lumen. An elongated cannula may be configured to be slidably engaged with the lumen. An Archmides' screw may be rotatably disposed within the cannula.
To better understand the nature and advantages of the invention, reference should be made to the following description and the accompanying figures. It is to be understood, however, that the figures and descriptions of exemplary embodiments are provided for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the scope of the present invention.
Effusion Removal:
Silent Liquid Removal:
Closed-Loop Control System:
The system 700 may include many of the components of a personal computer, such as a data bus, a memory, input and/or output devices (including a touch screen), and the like. The system 700 will often include both hardware and software, with the software typically comprising machine readable code or programming instructions for implementing one, some, or all of the methods described herein. The code may be embodied by a tangible media such as a memory, a magnetic recording media, an optical recording media, or the like. The system 700 may have (or be coupled to) a recording media reader, or the code may be transmitted to the processor 708 by a network connection such as an internet, an intranet, an Ethernet, a wireless network, or the like. Along with programming code, the system 700 may include stored data for implementing the methods described herein, and may generate and/or store data that records parameters reflecting the treatment of one or more patients.
In use, the device 800 is applied to a liquid and/or, light effusion within a patient's ear and suction is applied to the device 800, for example, by using the catheter 808. The filtering material 804 acts as a sound buffer by transferring the suction noise from the extreme distal end of the device to a more proximal location within cannula 802. In other words, the noise of suction does not occur at the extreme distal end, near the patient's ear drum, but instead occurs more proximally within cannula 802. Accordingly, the patient is protected from excessive noise due to the suction. The portion 806 extending from the cannula 802 may also cushion against unintended contact with portions of the ear canal and/or be used to physically abrade lodged effusion.
In use, the tympanostomy tube 910 is first implanted within a tympanic membrane TM of an ear of a patient, as shown. Devices and methods for locally anesthetizing the tympanic membrane for such a tube implant procedure are disclosed in co-assigned patent application U.S. Ser. No. 11/962,063 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,192,420), U.S. Ser. No. 11/749,729 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,387,124), and U.S. 61/085,360, which were incorporated by reference above. The device 900 can then be inserted into the lumen 908 of the tympanostomy tube 910 and applied to a lodged effusion E. The Archimedes' screw 904 may rotate at a relatively slow RPM, and accordingly does not generate excessive noise, i.e. sputtering, to disturb the patient. Rotation of the Archimedes' screw 904 causes the effusion E to engage Archimedes' screw 904 and travel out of the ear canal. The Archimedes' screw 904 may rotate at a constant torque to prevent jamming with particularly thick effusion. The Archimedes' screw 904 may also be actuated in and out of the cannula to help disrupt the lodged effusion. Suction may be applied to the proximal portion of the device 900 to aid in effusion removal.
It should be noted that the silent liquid removal systems and devices shown and described herein may also be used to remove effusion. For example, the silent liquid systems and devices shown and described herein may be inserted into an ear canal to remove effusion. The silent liquid systems and devices shown and described herein may also be inserted directly into the middle ear, following a myringotomy or tympanostomy, to remove lodged effusion. Accordingly, the systems and devices for silent liquid removal described herein are not limited to removing liquid drug solution, and may be used to remove any liquid and fluidic particulates within the ear.
As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the essential characteristics thereof. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/722,337, entitled “Silent Effusion Removal,” filed May 27, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,681,988), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/645,339, entitled “Silent Effusion Removal,” filed Dec. 22, 2009 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,078,783), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/140,805, also entitled “Silent Effusion Removal,” filed Dec. 24, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
858673 | Roswell | Jul 1907 | A |
1920006 | Deozier | Jul 1933 | A |
3261356 | Wallace | Jul 1966 | A |
3741197 | Sanz et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3897786 | Garnett et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3913584 | Walchle et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3948271 | Akiyama | Apr 1976 | A |
3991755 | Vernon et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4468218 | Armstrong | Aug 1984 | A |
4473073 | Darnell | Sep 1984 | A |
4564009 | Brinkhoff | Jan 1986 | A |
4641663 | Juhn | Feb 1987 | A |
4643719 | Garth | Feb 1987 | A |
4712537 | Pender | Dec 1987 | A |
4785796 | Mattson | Nov 1988 | A |
4971076 | Densert et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5024612 | Van Den Honert et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026378 | Goldsmith, III | Jun 1991 | A |
5044373 | Northeved et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053040 | Goldsmith, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5107861 | Narboni | Apr 1992 | A |
5129402 | Koll et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5254120 | Cinberg et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5261903 | Dhsliwal et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
D352780 | Gleaser et al. | Nov 1994 | S |
5421818 | Arenberg et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5466239 | Cinberg et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476446 | Arenburg | Dec 1995 | A |
5496329 | Reisinger | Mar 1996 | A |
5554071 | Peltola et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
D378611 | Croley | Mar 1997 | S |
5610988 | Miyahara | Mar 1997 | A |
5643280 | Del Rio et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5665094 | Goldenberg | Sep 1997 | A |
5674196 | Donaldson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
D387863 | Herman et al. | Dec 1997 | S |
5707383 | Bays et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711309 | Goldenberg | Jan 1998 | A |
5792100 | Shantha | Aug 1998 | A |
5827295 | Del Rio et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5848993 | Tanhehco | Dec 1998 | A |
5893828 | Uram | Apr 1999 | A |
5944711 | Pender | Aug 1999 | A |
5954682 | Petrus | Sep 1999 | A |
D418223 | Phipps et al. | Dec 1999 | S |
D420741 | Croley | Feb 2000 | S |
6024726 | Hill | Feb 2000 | A |
6045528 | Arenberg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
D424197 | Sydlowski et al. | May 2000 | S |
6059803 | Spilman | May 2000 | A |
D426135 | Lee | Jun 2000 | S |
6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6183469 | Thapliyal et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200280 | Brenneman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6245077 | East et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251121 | Saadat | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D450843 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
6358231 | Schindler | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6440102 | Arenberg | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6475138 | Schechter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6520939 | Lafontaine | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522827 | Loeb et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6645173 | Liebowitz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648873 | Arenberg et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663575 | Leysieffer | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682558 | Tu et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685697 | Arenberg | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6770080 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790171 | Grundeman et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6916159 | Rush et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7127285 | Henley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
D535027 | James et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
7160274 | Ciok et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7344507 | Briggs et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351246 | Epley | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381210 | Zarbatany et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D595410 | Luzon | Jun 2009 | S |
7563239 | Hudson et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
D598543 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2009 | S |
7654997 | Makower et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7677734 | Wallace | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7704259 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7749254 | Sobelman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
D622842 | Benoist | Aug 2010 | S |
8052693 | Shahoian | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8192420 | Morriss et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8409175 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425488 | Clifford et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8498425 | Graylin | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506898 | Perez | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518098 | Roeder et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
9078783 | Morriss et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20020069883 | Hirchenbain | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020138091 | Pflueger | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050182385 | Epley | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060155304 | Kaplan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167469 | Arden | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070100300 | Hashemian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070255175 | Sangha | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080051804 | Cottler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080212416 | Polonio et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262508 | Clifford | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262510 | Clifford | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300527 | Bivins | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100061581 | Soetejo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100274188 | Chang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
160583 | Mar 1933 | CH |
86105171 | Mar 1987 | CN |
19618585 | Nov 1997 | DE |
0214527 | Jan 1991 | EP |
1034808 | Sep 2000 | EP |
2526656 | Nov 1983 | FR |
2091672 | Sep 1997 | RU |
WO 2006059961 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006119512 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008030485 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008036368 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2009010788 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Comeau, M. et al ‘Local Anesthesia of the Ear by Iontophoresis’ (1973) Arch Otolaryngology. vol. 98 pp. 114-120 Abstract only. |
Comeau, M. et al ‘Local Anesthesia of the Human Tympanic Membrane by the Iontophoresis of a Local Anesthetic Nov. 9, 1978’ The Laryngoscope vol. 88 pp. 277-285. |
Echols, D.F. et al ‘Local Anesthesia of the Ear by Iontophoresis of Lidocaine’ (1973) Arch Otolaryngology. vol. 101 pp. 418-421 Abstract only. |
Epley, J.M. ‘Modified technique of Iontophoretic Anesthesia for Myringotomy in Children’ (1977) Arch Otolaryngology. vol. 103 pp. 358-360. |
Hasegawa, M. et al. ‘Iontophorectic Anesthesia of the Tympanic Membrane’ (1978) Clinical Otolaryngology. vol. 3 pp. 63-66 Abstract only. |
Medtronic XOMED, Activent® Antimicrobial Ventilation Tubes Advertisement, 2002, 4 pages. |
Mieromedics Innovative Surgical Products [retrieved on Jul. 15, 2010] Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.micromedics-usa.com/products/otology/micromedicstubes.htm. 7 pages. |
Plenum Compact Oxford English Dictionary <http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/plenum>. |
Plenum Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary <http://merriam-webster.com/definition/english/plenum>. |
Ramsden, R.T. et al. ‘Anesthesia of the Tympanie Membrane Using Iontophoresis’ (1977) The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. vol. 56, No. 9. pp. 779-785. |
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Jan. 2, 2015 re Application No. 2009329902. |
Australian Patent Examination Report No. 2 dated Aug. 25, 2015 re Application No. 2009329902. |
Chinese First Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2013 for Application No. CN 200980153120.2, 6 pages. |
Chinese Search Report dated Jan. 16, 2013 for Application No. CN 200980153120.2, 2 pages. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 12, 2016 for Application No. EP 16176477.4, 13 pgs. |
Partial European Search Report dated Sep. 5, 2016 for Application No. EP 16176477.4, 7 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 17, 2009 re Application No. PCT/US2008/060779. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 29, 2011 for Application No. PCT/US2009/069388, 10 pages. |
International Search Report (and Written Opinion) dated Nov. 6, 2009 re Application No. PCT/US2009/052395. |
International Search Report (and Written Opinion) dated Jun. 30, 2010 re Application No. PCT/US2009/069388. |
International Search Report (and Written Opinion) dated Aug. 27, 2010 re Application No. PCT/US2010/042128. |
International Search Report (and Written Opinion) dated Feb. 17, 2011 re Application No. PCT/US2010/058718. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2008 for Application No. PCT/US2008/060779, 1 pg. |
Japanese Office Action, Notification of Reasons for Refusal, dated Oct. 15, 2013 for Application No. JP 2011-543674, 3 pages. |
Japanese Office Action, Notification of Reasons for Refusal, dated Mar. 18, 2014 for Application No. JP 2011-543674, 3 pages. |
Mexican Examiner's Report dated Mar. 18, 2014 for Application No. MX/a/2011/006854, 2 pages. |
Mexican Examiner's Report dated Sep. 29, 2014 for Application No. MX/a/2011/006854, 2 pages. |
Mexican Examiner's Report dated Jan. 23, 2015 for Application No. MX/a/2011/006854, 2 pages. |
Russian Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2014 for Application No. RU 2011130914/14, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/085,360, filed Jul. 31, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/140,805, filed Dec. 24, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,339, filed Dec. 22, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/722,337, filed May 27, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 31, 2018 for Application No. 18177376.3, 7 pages. |
Indian Office Action dated May 30, 2018 for Application No. 2150/KOLNP/2011, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170319389 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61140805 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14722337 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15602424 | US | |
Parent | 12645339 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 14722337 | US |