SIMD processor with a subroutine control unit

Abstract

The invention relates to a method and an apparatus for controlling a digital signal processor having a number of arithmetic units (1a, 1b) which process a program (8). A control unit (5) is provided for independent control of the individual arithmetic units (1a, 1b), which control unit (5) reads and evaluates the flags (9a, 9b) which are specific to the arithmetic units, and deactivates those arithmetic units (1a, 1b) whose associated flag is not set, so that a subroutine is carried out only by those arithmetic units (1a, 1b) whose flags are set.

Description

[0001] The invention relates to a method for controlling a digital signal processor (DSP), and to an SIMD as claimed in the preamble of patent claims 1 and 7, respectively.

[0002] SIMD processors (SIMD: Single Instruction Multiple Data) are able to process a number of data streams in parallel, with only one program being used. They are thus used, for example, in telephone systems, where the speech data from a number of channels must be processed, and must be output on a transmission line, simultaneously.

[0003] Conventional SIMD processors have two or more arithmetic units, which are also referred to as ALUs (ALU: Arithmetic Logic Unit), and a program which is stored in a memory and is carried out simultaneously by all the arithmetic units. This program generally contains a series of subroutines, which are called by the main program, for example by means of a “Call command”.

[0004] The subroutines are normally also processed simultaneously by the arithmetic units. However, it is possible for a specific section of the main program or a subroutine to be carried out only by specific ones of the arithmetic units, but not by others. For example, a conditional call command may occur, whose jump condition is satisfied only by specific arithmetic units which are intended to process that subroutine.

[0005] In this case, conventional SIMD processors would produce incorrect results, since the program is always carried out simultaneously by all the arithmetic units in these processors.

[0006] The object of the present invention is thus to provide a method for controlling an SIMD processor as well as such an SIMD processor, in which predetermined program sections, in particular subroutines, can be carried out by only some of the arithmetic units.

[0007] This object is achieved by the features specified in patent claim 1 and in patent claim 7. Specific embodiments of the invention are the subject matter of dependent claims.

[0008] The fundamental idea of the invention is to control an SIMD signal processor such that those arithmetic units are switched off or deactivated which are not intended to carry out a specific program section, in particular a subroutine. These arithmetic units are then switched on or activated again at the end of that program section. According to the invention, the arithmetic units are controlled by means of flags (markers) which are specific to specific arithmetic units. Each arithmetic unit is preferably allocated its own flag, which indicates whether that arithmetic unit should or should not be deactivated.

[0009] Said flags are generally variables which are set or reset and, in particular, can be linked to predetermined conditions. The default setting for the flags is, for example, “active” (set), that is to say the arithmetic units are intended to remain switched on.

[0010] In order to find out which of the arithmetic units are intended to remain switched on and which are intended to be switched off, the flags of the arithmetic units are first of all read and evaluated. Those arithmetic units whose associated flag was not set are then switched off.

[0011] Finally, the program section or the subroutine is carried out only by those arithmetic units whose flag was set.

[0012] The reading and evaluation of the flags which are specific to arithmetic units are preferably carried out before the program is intended to jump into a subroutine (that is to say in the case of a call command, in particular in the case of a conditional call command).

[0013] The subroutine is preferably not called when all the flags are inactive.

[0014] According to one preferred embodiment of the invention, the arithmetic units are switched off by switching off an associated system clock. One arithmetic unit could optionally also be deactivated by means of a circuit (flipflop) with an enable function.

[0015] In order to switch off one of the arithmetic units, the control unit preferably produces an appropriate switching-off signal.

[0016] The invention will be explained in more detail in the following text using the attached drawings by way of example, in which:

[0017] FIG. 1 shows an outline illustration of an SIMD processor based on one exemplary embodiment of the invention;

[0018] FIG. 2 shows a program sequence when two flags are active;

[0019] FIG. 3 shows a program sequence when one flag is active and one flag is inactive; and

[0020] FIG. 4 shows a program sequence when two flags are inactive.

[0021] FIG. 1 shows an SIMD signal processor with two arithmetic units 1a, 1b, which normally process a program 8, which is stored in a memory 10 (ROM), simultaneously. The arithmetic units 1a, 1b each have computation units 2a, 2b, the actual ALUs, as well as registers 3a, 3b from which data streams 4a, 4b with n bits can be read.

[0022] The following text assumes that the program 8 calls a subroutine (call command) which, for example, is intended to be carried out only by the arithmetic unit 1a. The arithmetic unit 1b is intended to be switched off.

[0023] To do this, the SIMD signal processor has a control unit 5 which reads and evaluates a flag 9a for the first arithmetic unit la and a flag 9b for the second arithmetic unit 1b, via the paths 6a, 6b. The flags 9a, 9b may be stored, for example, in a RAM.

[0024] Since the subroutine is intended to be carried out only by the arithmetic unit 1a, the flag 9a is active and the flag 9b from the arithmetic unit 1b is inactive (not set). In a corresponding way, the control unit 5 outputs a switching-off signal via the channel 7b to the arithmetic unit 1b which, in consequence, is deactivated until a return command occurs at the end of the subroutine.

[0025] One possible control program which runs in the control unit 5 is described in the following text:

set   Powerdown_Channel_1=off;    //DEFAULT:BOTH
CHANNELS ACTIVE
set Powerdown_Channel_2=off;
if (Command from ROM=CALL) then
if Flag_Channel_1=inactive AND Flag Channel_2=inactive
(goto Next_Command from Next_Address;   // NO
CALL!!!
elsif (Flag_Channel_1=inactive)
set Powerdown_Channel_1=on;
goto Subprogram_Address;    //ONLY CHANNEL 2
ACTIVE
elsif (Flag_Channel_2=inactive) WHEN
set Powerdown_Channel_2=on;
goto Subprogram_Address; // ONLY CHANNEL 1 ACTIVE
Andif;
elsif (Command from ROM=RIT) then
set Powerdown_Channel_1=off;
set Powerdown_Channel_2=off;
else
...

[0026] The program is essentially self-explanatory and includes three alternatives, namely: 1) the flags of both arithmetic units 1a, 1b (Channel 1, Channel 2) are inactive; 2) only the flag for the arithmetic unit la is inactive; and 3) only the flag for the arithmetic unit 2 is inactive.

[0027] FIG. 2 shows an example of a program sequence in which the flags 9a, 9b of both arithmetic units 1a, 1b (Channel 1 and Channel 2, respectively) are active (default setting). After a call command, a subroutine is carried out by both arithmetic units 1a, 1b. In this case, the control unit 5 does not output any switching-off signal (Powerdown 1, Powerdown 2).

[0028] FIG. 3 shows a program sequence in which the flag 9a is inactive (not set). When a call command occurs in the main program 8, the control unit 5 deactivates the arithmetic unit 1a (0/1 flank in the Signal Powerdown 1). The arithmetic unit 1a remains inactive until the subroutine has been processed, and a return command (RET) has been carried out.

[0029] FIG. 4 shows a program sequence in which the flags 9a, 9b of both arithmetic units 1a, 1b are inactive. A call command in the main program 8 results in the main program 8 being continued. No subroutine is called. The control unit 5 does not output any switching-off signal to the arithmetic units 1a, 1b.

LIST OF REFERENCE SYMBOLS

[0030]

1a, 1b Arithmetic units
2a, 2b ALU
3a, 3b Registers
4a, 4b Data streams
5      Control unit
6a, 6b Connecting lines
7a, 7b Channels
8      Program
9a, 9b Flags
10     Memory

Claims

1. A method for controlling a digital signal processor, in particular an SIMD processor, having a number of arithmetic units (1a, 1b) which process a program (8),

2. The method as claimed in claim 1,

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 or 2,

4. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

5. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

6. The method as claimed in one of the preceding claims,

7. A digital signal processor, in particular an SIMD signal processor having a number of arithmetic units (1a, 1b) and having a memory (10) for a program (8) which is processed by the arithmetic units (1a, 1b), distinguished by a control unit (5) which is connected to the arithmetic units (1a, 1b) and is able to switch off one or more of the arithmetic units (1a, 1b) when a predetermined condition is satisfied.

8. The digital signal processor as claimed in claim 7, wherein an arithmetic unit (1a, 1b) is switched off when an associated flag (9a, 9b), which is specific to that arithmetic unit, is not set.