This application is related to, and incorporates by reference the entire disclosure of the following: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/214,544 (filed 29 Aug. 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/219,067 (filed 1 Sep. 2005); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/366,212 (filed 2 Mar. 2006); and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/367,020 (filed 2 Mar. 2006).
The present invention relates generally to integrated circuit fabrication, and more specifically to simplified processes for forming pitch doubled integrated circuit features.
Integrated circuits are continuously being made smaller as demand for portability, computing power, memory capacity and energy efficiency in modern electronics grows. Therefore, the size of the integrated circuit constituent features, such as electrical devices and interconnect line widths, is also decreasing continuously. The trend of decreasing feature size is evident in memory circuits or devices such as dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”), flash memory, nonvolatile memory, static random access memory (“SRAM”), ferroelectric (“FE”) memory, logic gate arrays and so forth.
For example, DRAM typically comprises millions of identical circuit elements, known as memory cells. A typical memory cell consists of two electrical devices: a storage capacitor and an access field effect transistor. Each memory cell is an addressable location that can store one binary digit (“bit”) of data. A bit can be written to a memory cell through the transistor and read by sensing charge on the reference electrode of the storage capacitor. By decreasing the sizes of these constituent electrical devices and the conducting lines that interconnect them, the sizes of the memory devices incorporating memory cells can likewise be decreased. In similar fashion, the storage capacities of these devices can be increased by fitting more memory cells into the memory devices.
As another example, flash memory (for example, electrically erasable programmable read only memory or “EEPROM”) is a type of memory that is typically erased and reprogrammed in blocks instead of one byte at a time. A typical flash memory comprises a memory array, which includes a large number of memory cells. The memory cells include a floating gate field effect transistor capable of holding a charge. The data in a memory cell is determined by the presence or absence of charge on the floating gate. The cells are usually grouped into sections called “erase blocks.” The memory cells of a flash memory array are typically arranged into a “NOR” architecture (in which each memory cell is directly coupled to a bit line) or a “NAND” architecture (in which memory cells are coupled into “strings” of cells, such that each cell is coupled indirectly to a bit line and requires activating the other cells of the string for access). The memory cells within an erase block can be electrically programmed on a random basis by charging the floating gate. The charge can be removed from the floating gate by a block erase operation, wherein all floating gate memory cells in the erase block are erased in a single operation.
As is evident from the examples provided here, memory devices typically include large patterns or arrays of electrical devices and conductors that are used to interconnect the electrical devices. The “pitch” of such a pattern is defined as the distance between an identical point in two neighboring features in the pattern. These features are typically defined by openings in, and are spaced apart from each other by, a material such as an insulator or conductor. Thus, pitch can be understood as the sum of the width of a feature and the width of the space separating that feature from a neighboring feature.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a method for fabricating a semiconductor device comprises patterning a layer of photoresist material to form a plurality of mandrels in a device array region. The method further comprises depositing an oxide material over the plurality of mandrels and over a device peripheral region. The method further comprises anisotropically etching the oxide material from exposed horizontal surfaces in the device array region. The method further comprises forming a pattern of photoresist material over the oxide material in the device peripheral region. The method further comprises selectively etching photoresist material from the device array region and from the device peripheral region.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method of forming a memory device comprises forming a plurality of mandrels over a substrate in an array region of the memory device. The mandrels optionally comprise a photoresist material. The mandrels are separated by exposed portions the substrate. The method further comprises depositing a spacer material over the mandrels, over the exposed portions of the substrate, and over a peripheral region of the memory device. The method further comprises depositing a peripheral mask over the spacer material in the peripheral region of the memory device. The method further comprises anisotropically etching the spacer material from exposed horizontal surfaces. Spacer material is left remaining (a) on vertical sidewalls of the mandrels in the array region, and (b) between the substrate and the peripheral mask in the peripheral region.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method of forming an integrated circuit comprises forming a plurality of mandrels on a hard mask layer in an array region. The mandrels comprise a photoresist material. The method further comprises depositing an oxide material over the array region and over a peripheral region that surrounds the array region. The oxide material covers the plurality of mandrels. The method further comprises forming a pattern of photoresist material over the oxide material in the peripheral region. The method further comprises anisotropically etching the oxide material from horizontal surfaces in the array region. The method further comprises removing exposed photoresist material from the array region and the peripheral region after anisotropically etching the oxide material.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method of integrated circuit fabrication comprises using a lithographic technique to define a plurality of elongate mandrels over a hard mask layer in an integrated circuit array region. The mandrels comprise a photoresist material. The method further comprises forming a pattern of spacers around the plurality of elongate mandrels. The pattern of spacers have a pitch that is smaller than a minimum resolvable pitch of the lithographic technique. The spacers are formed from an oxide material that is deposited at a temperature less than about 100° C.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a partially formed integrated circuit comprises a substrate. The partially formed integrated circuit further comprises a hard mask layer positioned over the substrate. The partially formed integrated circuit further comprises a plurality of spacer loops that are formed directly over the hard mask layer, and that are at least partially positioned in an array region of the partially formed integrated circuit. The partially formed integrated circuit further comprises a mask at least partially defined in a peripheral region of the partially formed integrated circuit, wherein the mask is also directly formed over the hard mask layer.
Exemplary embodiments of the integrated circuits and integrated circuit fabrication techniques disclosed herein are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, which are for illustrative purposes only, and which are not necessarily drawn to scale. The drawings comprise the following figures, in which like numerals indicate like parts.
As the size of the electrical devices and the conductors that comprise a memory device are made smaller and smaller, ever greater demands are placed on the techniques used to form these features. For example, photolithography is commonly used to pattern device features, such as conductive lines, on a substrate. The concept of pitch can be used to describe the size of these features. Due to optical factors such as light or radiation wavelength, however, photolithography techniques have a minimum pitch below which features cannot be formed reliably. Thus, the minimum pitch of a photolithographic technique can limit feature size reduction.
One technique proposed for extending the capabilities of photolithographic techniques beyond their minimum pitch is the “pitch doubling” technique. This technique is illustrated in
While pitch is actually reduced using these techniques, this reduction in pitch is conventionally referred to as “pitch doubling”, or more generally, “pitch multiplication”. This is because these techniques allow the number of features in a given region of the substrate to be doubled, or more generally, multiplied. Thus, using the conventional terminology, “multiplication” of pitch by a certain factor actually involves reducing the pitch by that factor. The conventional terminology is retained herein. By forming multiple layers of spacers upon each other, the definable feature size can be made even smaller. Thus, the terms “pitch multiplication” and “pitch doubling” refer to the process generally, regardless of the number of times the spacer formation process is employed.
Some proposed methods for forming patterns in the periphery and in the array of a memory device involve use of two separate carbon layers. For example, in one such method, the mandrels used to define spacer loops are formed in an upper carbon layer. After pitch doubling and periphery patterning processes are performed, the array pattern is transferred to a lower carbon layer. While this process does allow features of different sizes to be formed in the array and periphery regions, use of a low temperature oxide material to define the spacer loops allows mandrels to be formed from the existing photoresist layer. This advantageously allows the top carbon layer to be omitted, thereby simplifying production.
In accordance with the foregoing, simplified and improved techniques have been developed for forming arrays of features in different regions of a memory device.
In certain embodiments, the feature pattern to be transferred to a substrate has a pitch below the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique used for processing the substrate. Additionally, certain embodiments can be used to form arrays of features, including logic or gate arrays and volatile and non-volatile memory devices such as DRAM, phase change memory (“PCM”), programmable conductor random access memory (“PCRAM”), read only memory (“ROM”), flash memory. In such devices, pitch multiplication is usable to form, for example, transistor gate electrodes and conductive lines in the array region of the devices. Optionally, conventional photolithography is usable to form larger features, such as local interconnects and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (“CMOS”) circuits, in the peripheral region of the devices. For example, the logic array can be a field programmable gate array (“FPGA”) having a core array similar to a memory array and a periphery with supporting logic circuits. Exemplary masking steps in the course of fabricating a memory device are illustrated in the figures and are described herein.
On the other hand, the peripheral region 104 optionally includes features larger than those in the array region 102. Conventional photolithography, rather than pitch multiplication, is typically used to pattern these larger features, examples of which include various types of logic circuitry. The geometric complexity of the logic circuits located in the peripheral region 104 makes using pitch multiplication difficult in this region of the integrated circuit 100. In contrast, the regular grid typical of array patterns is conducive to pitch multiplication. Additionally, some devices in the peripheral region 104 may require larger geometries due to electrical constraints, thereby making pitch multiplication less advantageous than conventional photolithography for such devices. In addition to possible differences in relative scale, the relative positions, and the number of peripheral regions 104 and array regions 102 in the integrated circuit 100 can vary in other embodiments. In embodiments wherein different processing techniques are separately used to form features in the array region 102 and the peripheral region 104, the peripheral region 104 can be masked during processing of the array region.
An optional second hard mask layer 110 is formed over the first hard mask layer 108. The second hard mask layer 110 preferably comprises an inorganic material. Example materials for the second hard mask layer 110 include silicon nitride, polycrystalline silicon, or a dielectric antireflective coating (“DARC”), such as silicon-rich silicon oxynitride. Preferably, the material comprising the second hard mask layer 110 can be selectively etched with respect to subsequently-deposited spacer materials. Use of a DARC for the second hard mask layer 110 can be particularly advantageous for forming patterns having pitches near the resolution limits of a photolithographic technique. In particular, a DARC can enhance resolution by reducing light reflections, thus increasing the precision with which photolithography can define the edges of a pattern. The second hard mask layer 110 is omitted in embodiments wherein the first hard mask layer 108 can be etched selectively with respect to subsequently deposited spacer materials. In still other embodiments, the second hard mask layer 110 is replaced with an organic spin on antireflective coating (“ARC”) positioned between the first hard mask layer 108 and the subsequently described overlying array photoresist layer.
An array photoresist layer 111, also referred to herein as a mandrel layer, is formed over the second hard mask layer 110. The array photoresist layer 111 preferably comprises a photoresist material that is compatible with 157 nm, 193 nm, 248 nm or 365 nm wavelength systems, 193 nm wavelength immersion systems, extreme ultraviolet systems such as 13.7 nm wavelength systems, or electron beam lithographic systems. Examples of preferred photoresist materials include argon fluoride sensitive photoresist (that is, photoresist suitable for use with an argon fluoride light source) and krypton fluoride sensitive photoresist (that is, photoresist suitable for use with a krypton fluoride light source). Argon fluoride photoresists are preferably used with shorter wavelength photolithography systems, such as 193 nm wavelength systems. Krypton fluoride photoresists are preferably used with longer wavelength photolithography systems, such as 248 nm wavelength systems. In a modified embodiment, the array photoresist layer 111 comprises a photoresist material that can be patterned by nano-imprint lithography, such as by using a mold or a mechanical force to pattern the photoresist material.
In general, the materials for the first hard mask layer 108, the second hard mask layer 110, and the array photoresist layer 111 are chosen based on the chemistry and the process conditions for the various pattern forming and transfer steps disclosed herein. For instance, in an example embodiment, the first hard mask layer 108, the second hard mask layer 110, and the array photoresist layer 111 can each be selectively etched with respect to each other. As used herein, a material is considered “selectively etched” (or “preferentially etched”) when the etch rate for that material is at least about 2 times greater, preferably at least about 10 times greater, more preferably at least about 20 times greater, and most preferably at least about 40 times greater than that for a neighboring material. In modified embodiments other layers are added if suitable other materials, chemistries and/or processes conditions are used.
The first hard mask layer 108, the second hard mask layer 110, and the array photoresist layer 111 can be formed using deposition processes such as spin-on coating, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”), or atomic layer deposition. For example, a low temperature CVD process (preferably less than about 550° C., more preferably less than about 450° C., and most preferably less than about 400° C.) advantageously reduces chemical and/or physical disruption of an amorphous carbon layer, and thus is useful for deposition of materials over an existing amorphous carbon layer, such as the first hard mask layer 108. Additional information regarding the formation of amorphous carbon layers, including doped amorphous carbon layers, is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,573,030 (issued 3 Jun. 2003) and U.S. Patent Application Publication 2005/0042879 (published 24 Feb. 2005). The entire disclosure of this patent and patent application publication is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The thicknesses of the first hard mask layer 108, the second hard mask layer 110, and the array photoresist layer 111 are also chosen depending upon compatibility with the etch chemistries and process conditions disclosed herein. For example, when etching a material through a mask of another material, such as when transferring a pattern from an overlying layer to an underlying layer by selectively etching the underlying layer, materials from both layers are removed to some degree. Thus, the upper layer is preferably sufficiently thick such that it is not completely worn away over the course of the pattern transfer. In an example embodiment, the second hard mask layer 110 is preferably between about 10 nm and about 40 nm thick, and is more preferably between about 15 nm and about 30 nm thick.
The thickness of the array photoresist layer 111 depends on the wavelength of light used to pattern the array photoresist layer 111. In an example embodiment wherein 248 nm light is used to perform photolithography, the array photoresist layer 111 is preferably between about 50 nm and about 300 nm thick, and is more preferably between about 200 nm and 250 nm thick. This height can vary depending upon the wavelength of light used to pattern the photoresist layer. Because lines are subsequently formed in the array photoresist layer 111, in certain embodiments the height of the array photoresist layer 111 is limited by the structural integrity and the aspect ratio of the lines to be formed, since tall spacer lines may collapse or otherwise deform.
As illustrated in
The pitch of the resulting lines 124 is equal to the sum of the width of a line 124 and the width of a neighboring trench 122. To reduce the dimensions of features formed using this pattern of lines 124 and trenches 122, the pitch can be at or near the limits of the photolithographic technique used to pattern the array photoresist layer 111. For example, for photolithography using 248 nm light, the pitch of the lines 124 is preferably between about 80 nm and about 150 nm, and is more preferably between about 90 nm and about 120 nm. Thus, in an example embodiment the pitch is the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique and the subsequently-formed pitch multiplied spacer pattern advantageously has a pitch below the minimum pitch of the photolithographic technique. In alternative embodiments, because the margin of error for position and feature size typically increases as the limits of a photolithographic technique are approached, the lines 124 are formed having larger feature sizes, such as 200 nm, to reduce errors in the positions and sizes of the lines 124.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
In an example embodiment, the low temperature spacer material 126 is deposited in an ALD process using Si2Cl6, H2O and C5H5N precursors. In such embodiments the spacer material 126 is deposited to a thickness that is preferably between about 20 nm and about 65 nm, more preferably between about 25 nm and about 60 nm, and most preferably between about 30 nm and about 55 nm. In one embodiment, the spacer material thickness is between about 30 nm and about 40 nm, and in another embodiment, the spacer material thickness is between about 43 nm and about 55 nm. The spacer material deposition rate is preferably between about 1 Å per cycle and about 4 Å per cycle, and more preferably about 2 Å per cycle.
As illustrated in
In modified embodiments, the periphery photoresist layer 128 is deposited in the same deposition step in which the array photoresist layer 111 is deposited. In such embodiments, the mask used to pattern the array photoresist layer 111 is configured so as to leave a photoresist pattern or blanket layer in the peripheral region 104. This process results in photoresist being deposited directly on the second hard mask layer 110 in the peripheral region 104, without the intervening spacer material 126.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
After the freestanding spacers 130 are formed, subsequent processing steps can be conducted, such as a dry develop step and an in situ etch step. The subsequent processing steps can be used to transfer the pattern of spacers 130 and periphery features to the underlying first hard mask layer 108 and/or the second hard mask layer 110, as illustrated in
Certain of the techniques disclosed herein advantageously enable the formation of a pitch doubled pattern of spacers to be formed in the array region without the use of additional layers to define the array features, such as a top carbon layer and an amorphous silicon layer. Specifically, by forming low temperature oxide spacers directly on the array photoresist layer 111 as disclosed herein, the photoresist material itself can be used to define mandrels which are used in a subsequent pitch multiplication technique. This advantageously eliminates the need to pattern additional masking layers to define mandrels. Such techniques advantageously allow process steps associated with such additional masking layers to be eliminated, such as additional dry develop steps and hard mask etch steps. Furthermore, such techniques also advantageously allow the periphery photoresist layer 128 to be defined using the same low temperature spacer material that is used to form the spacers in the array region. Certain of the embodiments disclosed herein also advantageously allow a hard mask material—as compared to a more vulnerable photoresist material—to be used to block and define features in the peripheral region 104 without requiring the use of a separate hard mask layer.
While the foregoing detailed description discloses several embodiments of the present invention, it should be understood that this disclosure is illustrative only and is not limiting of the present invention. It should be appreciated that the specific configurations and operations disclosed can differ from those described above, and that the methods described herein can be used in contexts other than integrated circuit fabrication.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4234362 | Riseman | Nov 1980 | A |
4246822 | Deutsch | Jan 1981 | A |
4419809 | Riseman et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4432132 | Kinsbron et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4452442 | Geschwindner | Jun 1984 | A |
4502914 | Trumpp et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508579 | Goth et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4570325 | Higuchi | Feb 1986 | A |
4648937 | Ogura et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4713756 | Mackiewicz | Dec 1987 | A |
4716131 | Okazawa et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4751645 | Abrams | Jun 1988 | A |
4776922 | Bhattascharyya et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4838991 | Cote et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5013680 | Lowrey et al. | May 1991 | A |
5047117 | Roberts | Sep 1991 | A |
5053105 | Fox, III | Oct 1991 | A |
5117027 | Bernhardt et al. | May 1992 | A |
5328810 | Lowrey et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330879 | Dennison | Jul 1994 | A |
5470661 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5502320 | Yamada | Mar 1996 | A |
5514885 | Myrick | May 1996 | A |
5593813 | Kim | Jan 1997 | A |
5670794 | Manning | Sep 1997 | A |
5753546 | Koh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5789320 | Andricacos et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795830 | Cronin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5830332 | Babich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5899746 | Mukai | May 1999 | A |
5905285 | Gardner et al. | May 1999 | A |
5998256 | Juengling | Dec 1999 | A |
6004862 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6042998 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057573 | Kirsch et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063688 | Doyle et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071789 | Yang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110837 | Linliu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6143476 | Ye et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6207490 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211044 | Xiang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6282113 | Debrosse | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288454 | Allman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291334 | Somekh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297554 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335257 | Tseng | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348380 | Weimer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6383907 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395613 | Juengling | May 2002 | B1 |
6404056 | Kuge et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423474 | Holscher | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455372 | Weimer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6475867 | Hui et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500756 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514884 | Maeda | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522584 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6534243 | Templeton | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548396 | Naik et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559017 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566280 | Meagley et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573030 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602779 | Li et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6627933 | Juengling | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632741 | Clevenger | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638441 | Chang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6667237 | Metzler | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673684 | Huang et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686245 | Mathew et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689695 | Lui et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707092 | Sasaki | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709807 | Hallock et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6734063 | Willer et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734107 | Lai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744094 | Forbes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6768663 | Ogata | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773998 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6777725 | Willer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6794699 | Bissey et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800930 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6835662 | Erhardt et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6867116 | Chung | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875703 | Furukawa et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6924191 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936507 | Tang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955961 | Chung | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6962867 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7015124 | Fisher et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7074668 | Park et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7084076 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7098105 | Juengling | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115525 | Abatchev | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7183205 | Hong | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183597 | Doyle | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7208379 | Venugopal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7271107 | Marks et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288445 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291560 | Parascandola et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20010005631 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020042198 | Bjarnason et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045308 | Juengling | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063110 | Cantell et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068243 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094688 | Mitsuiki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020125536 | Iwasa et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020127810 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130348 | Tran | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130686 | Forbes | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135029 | Ping et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020158273 | Satoh et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006410 | Doyle | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008461 | Forbes et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040186 | Juengling et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030042542 | Maegawa et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030044722 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030073044 | Reynolds | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030109102 | Kujirai et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119307 | Bekiaris et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030127426 | Chang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157436 | Manger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030207207 | Li | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030207584 | Sivakumar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215978 | Maimon et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216050 | Golz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218199 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030230234 | Nam et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000534 | Lipinski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017989 | So | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018738 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023475 | Bronser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040023502 | Tzou et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036095 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041189 | Voshell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043623 | Liu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053475 | Sharma | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040079988 | Harari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106257 | Okamura et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113171 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040157455 | Johansson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040191997 | Kawahara et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040235255 | Tanaka | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050042879 | Yin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050074949 | Jung et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050112886 | Asakawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050142497 | Ryou et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050153562 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164454 | Leslie | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167394 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186705 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050272259 | Hong | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277249 | Juengling | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003182 | Lane et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024940 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024945 | Kim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028859 | Forbes | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046161 | Yin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046200 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046201 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046407 | Juengling | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046422 | Tran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046484 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060083996 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060134909 | Nagase et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172540 | Marks et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189150 | Jung | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060211260 | Tran | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216293 | Couto | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216923 | Tran et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231900 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234138 | Fehlhaber et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060263699 | Abatchev | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267075 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060273456 | Sant | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276018 | Nam et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060278911 | Eppich | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060281266 | Wells | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018345 | Chao et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026672 | Tang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042605 | Abatchev et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045712 | Haller et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048674 | Wells | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049011 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049030 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049032 | Abatchev et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049035 | Tran | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049040 | Bai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050748 | Juengling | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070145450 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070210449 | Caspary et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215874 | Furukawa et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215960 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070275309 | Liu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080054350 | Breitwisch et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
280851 | Jul 1990 | DE |
42 36 609 | May 1994 | DE |
44 08 764 | Sep 1994 | DE |
199 28 781 | Jul 2000 | DE |
0227303 | Jul 1987 | EP |
0491408 | Jun 1992 | EP |
1357433 | Oct 2003 | EP |
57-048237 | Mar 1982 | JP |
05343370 | Dec 1993 | JP |
H8-55908 | Feb 1996 | JP |
H8-55920 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2004-152784 | May 2004 | JP |
1999-0001440 | Jan 1999 | KR |
1999-027887 | Apr 1999 | KR |
WO 9415261 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 0101489 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 02099864 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 04001799 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004003977 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004073044 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005010973 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034215 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006026699 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006127586 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070238308 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |