The present invention relates to a method for inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant of less than 6 months of age comprising administering a dose of at least 108 TCID50 of an MVA to a human neonate.
There are only three vaccines that are licensed globally for immunization at birth: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) to prevent tuberculosis, oral Polio vaccine (OPV), and hepatitis B vaccine (HBV). Sanchez-Schmitz et al., Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 90ps27 (2011). BCG is a single-dose vaccine of freeze-dried, live Mycobacterium bovis. Id. OPV is a single-dose vaccine of a live-attenuated poliovirus. Id. HBV vaccine is a recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen expressed in yeast that is administered with Alum in three-doses, starting at birth. Id. Thus, two of these are live, replicating vaccines, and the other is a recombinant protein given in three doses.
The immaturity of the immune system in newborns has been a major bottleneck to develop safe and effective vaccines at this age. Under the current vaccination schedule for infants, only the Hepatitis B vaccine is recommended at birth, while others are given later during infancy (first 12 months, e.g. rotavirus, inactivated poliovirus vaccine), or are only recommended at 12 months or older (e.g. measles/mumps/rubella vaccine), although in all cases multiple vaccinations are required during infancy/childhood to induce high levels of protection. Sanchez-Schmitz et al., Sci., there is a time span of six to nine months after birth with increased susceptibility to diseases that could be prevented by vaccines. Id. Smallpox, AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and other diseases occur in young children with a rapid and often severe disease progression. Even for childhood diseases such as RSV or measles, vaccines do not exist or cannot be administered before 9 months of age. Consequently, vaccination of neonates (within first 4 weeks) and/or a reduced or more effective schedule in infants would be a major advance in reducing mortality and morbidity associated with infectious diseases.
It is generally accepted that newborns mount mainly TH2 biased T-cell responses and produce no or only low levels of antibodies with limited affinity. In addition, these responses are of shorter duration than in adults. Adkins et al., Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 553-564 (2004); Marshall-Clarke et al., Immunol. Today 21, 35-41 (2000); Siegrist, C. A., Vaccine 19, 3331-3346 (2001).
However, under certain circumstances, such as activation of pattern recognition receptors or during certain viral infections, newborn mice can mount protective T-cell responses over time, indicating the potential for neonatal immunization. Forsthuber et al., Science 271, 1728-1730 (1996); Sarzotti et al., Science 271, 1726-1728 (1996).
Parallel to the development of adjuvants improving existing vaccines (Gracia et al., Vaccine 29, 1595-1604 (2011); Kamath et al., PLoS. One. 3, e3683 (2008)), new antigen delivery systems like DNA vaccines (Hassett et al., J. Virol. 74, 2620-2627 (2000); Rigato et al., Virology 406, 37-47 (2010)) and the three attenuated replicating bacterial strains Salmonella enteric (Ramirez et al., Vaccine 28, 6065-6075 (2010)), Listeria monocytogenes (Kollmann et al., J. Immunol. 178, 3695-3701 (2007)), and BCG (Nascimento et al., Microbes. Infect. 10, 198-202 (2008); Ranganathan et al., Vaccine 28, 152-161 (2009)) were shown to induce efficient immune responses when administered in one week old mice or even at birth. However, only live attenuated replicating vaccines induced protection against lethal infections, and were generally effective only after several immunizations and thus at a stage with a progressed immunological maturity. Hence, replicative vaccines require substantial time to induce successful protection, and the risk of uncontrolled disseminated infections of live attenuated replicating vaccines still represent major limitations (Galen et al., Immunol. Cell Biol. 87, 400-412 (2009); Johnson et al., Microbiol. Immunol. 55, 304-317 (2011); Li et al., Zhonghua Er. Ke. Za Zhi. 48, 65-68 (2010); Liu et al., Immunol. Rev. 239, 62-84 (2011)).
Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) has been administered to over 100,000 individuals during the smallpox eradication campaign without any complications. However, MVA still represents a complex mixture of viruses with different levels of attenuation and immunogenicity. Suter et al., Vaccine 27, 7442-7450 (2009). The plaque-purified MVA developed by Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) completely fails to replicate in mammals including humans and is safe even in immune-compromised hosts. Id. Besides its excellent safety profile, MVA is highly immunogenic in humans (Vollmar et al., Vaccine 24, 2065-2070 (2006)) and its efficacy has been proven in several smallpox animal models such as Ectromelia virus (ECTV), rabbitpox or monkeypox (Garza et al., Vaccine 27, 5496-5504 (2009); Samuelsson et al., J. Clin. Invest 118, 1776-1784 (2008); Stittelaar at al., J. Virol. 79, 7845-7851 (2005)). Another major advantage of MVA is its capacity to support the genetic insertion of several antigens (Timm et al., Vaccine 24, 4618-4621 (2006)) that could concomitantly induce protection against other infectious diseases or cancer ((Harrer et al. Antivir. Ther. 10, 285-300 (2005); Mandl et al., Cancer Immunol. Immunother. (2011); Meyer et al., Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 54, 453-467 (2005)).
ECTV (the causative agent of mousepox) in mice is a good model system for human poxvirus infection. Esteban et al., Journal of General Virology (2005), 86, 2645-2659. The course of disease is very similar for mousepox and smallpox, including the entry route, the high infectivity at low doses, the development of viremia, the restricted host range, and the delayed but fatal outcome. Therefore, mousepox can be regarded as a valuable small animal model for human smallpox and, in general, as a model for acute, fatal viral diseases. Lauterbach et al., PLoS ONE, Volume 5(3): e9659 (2010).
The pathogenesis of ECTV infection in mice, with localized replication and systemic spread, is similar to the pathogenesis of Variola virus in humans. Chapman et al., Vet Pathol 2010 47: 852 (2010). A comparison of short-term and postexposure protection in mice infected with VACV-WR and ECTV suggested that ECTV infection more closely resembles human smallpox. Paran et al., The Journal of Infectious Diseases; 199:39-48 (2009).
The vaccination of mice with MVA at birth is safe and induces an increase of FLT3 ligand, leading to an accelerated development of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) and activation of conventional (c) DC resulting in improved resistance against heterologous viral infection. (Franchini at al., J. Immunol. 172, 6304-6312 (2004), Vollstedt et al., Eur J Immunol. 34: 1849-1860 (2004) Vollstedt et al., Eur J Immunol. 36: 1231-1240 (2006). Vaccination of one or two-day old mice with 2.5×107 TCID50 of MVA protected most mice against challenge with a lethal dose of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) at 7-8 days after vaccination and protected most mice against challenge with a lethal dose of vaccinia Western Reserve (VV-WR) at 4 weeks after immunization, when the mice were considered adults. WO 03/088994A2. To determine the virus dose needed for maximal induction of CD11c+ cells, graded doses of MVA were tested. Maximal numbers of CD11c+ cells were detected after treatment with 2.5×106 TCID50 of virus; whereas, doses below and above this were less effective. Id. Thus, 2.5×106 TCID50 was considered to be the optimal dose of MVA for the vaccination of neonates.
Consequently, a need in the art exists for compositions and methods for vaccination of neonates to achieve strong T-cell and antibody responses and protection against pathogens. The invention fulfills this need.
The invention encompasses compositions and methods for inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant of less than 6 months of age. In one embodiment, the invention encompasses administering a dose of at least 108 TCID50 of an MVA to a human neonate or infant of less than 6 months of age, wherein the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against a poxvirus in the human neonate prior to 6 months of age, preferably within 2 weeks of the administration. Most preferably, the immune response is induced in the absence of a second administration of the MVA.
In various embodiments, the administration is administered to a human neonate or infant of less than 2 months of age or within 72 hours after birth.
Preferably, the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against a poxvirus. Most preferably, the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against smallpox.
In some embodiments, the invention encompasses administering one or more boosting administrations of the MVA.
In some embodiments, the MVA is a recombinant MVA. In some embodiments, the administration induces T- and B-cell responses against a heterologous antigen encoded by the recombinant MVA.
The threat of a potential bioterrorism attack or emergence of zoonotic poxviruses in the human population has prompted several efforts to develop a safer third generation smallpox vaccine suitable for at-risk populations contraindicated for ACAM2000™, the smallpox vaccine currently licensed in the USA. However, at-risk populations include not only immuno-compromised individuals such as HIV patients or individuals suffering from skin disorders like atopic dermatitis, but also children less than one year old due to the immaturity of their immune system. MVA-BN with its excellent safety profile as a replication-deficient live virus has previously been shown to enhance broad-spectrum resistance to viral infections in the first week of life in mice. Franchini, J. Immunol. 172, 6304-6312 (2004).
Naïve neonates are considered difficult if not impossible to protect against fatal infections shortly after birth. However, by increasing the vaccination dose to a dose of 1×108 TCID50 of Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA), it was demonstrated that a single immunization of mice at birth induced fully functional T- and B-cell responses that rapidly conferred full protection against a lethal orthopoxvirus challenge. Surprisingly, protection is induced within 2 weeks and is mainly T-cell-dependent. Furthermore, persisting immunological T-cell memory and neutralizing antibodies were obtained with this single vaccination. Thus, MVA administered as early as at birth induces immediate and long-term protection against fatal diseases and appears attractive as a platform for early childhood vaccines.
A single vaccination of mice with MVA at birth not only induces innate, but also adaptive immune responses including effector and long term memory T-cells as well as neutralizing antibody responses. Importantly, within two weeks after vaccination the adaptive immune response fully protects mice against a lethal intranasal challenge with ECTV.
Here, it is demonstrated that an important role for T-cells exists in newborn mice. When immunized with a low dose of 2×106 TCID50 of MVA, a strong cytotoxic T-cell response was induced, which led to partial protection from ECTV challenge in the absence of detectable antibody responses. Complete protection was only achieved after vaccination with a high dose of 1×108 TCID50 of MVA, a dose that also induces B-cell responses. This was confirmed in T11μMT transgenic mice, in which partial protection showed that B-cells are also required in order to achieve complete protection after a single vaccination with MVA at birth.
The invention encompasses compositions and methods for inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant. In one embodiment, the invention encompasses administering a dose of at least 108 TCID50 of an MVA to a human neonate or infant. The MVA can be administered to a human neonate or infant prior to the full maturation of the immune system.
The invention further encompasses MVA for use in inducing a protective immune response against a poxvirus in a human neonate or infant.
The invention also encompasses MVAs for use in vaccinating a human neonate or infant. The invention also encompasses the use of MVAs as vaccines for treating a human neonate or infant and the use of MVAs in the preparation of vaccines or medicaments for treating or vaccinating a human neonate or infant.
Human Neonates and Infants
Within the context of this invention, the term “human neonate” refers to a newborn human less than 1 month of age and the term “human infant” refers to a human between birth and 1 year of age. Preferably, the human neonate is less than 4 weeks of age, less than 3 weeks of age, less than 2 weeks of age, or less than 1 week of age. More preferably, the human neonate is less than 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 days of age.
In one embodiment, a dose of MVA is administered to a human neonate. In various embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human neonate of less than 4 weeks of age, less than 3 weeks of age, less than 2 weeks of age, or less than 1 week of age. In various embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human neonate of less than 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 days of age. In preferred embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human neonate within 3, 2, or 1 days of birth.
In one embodiment, a dose of MVA is administered to a human infant of less than 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 months of age. In various embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human infant of less than 8 weeks of age, less than 7 weeks of age, less than 6 weeks of age, or less than 5 weeks of age. In preferred embodiments, a dose of MVA is administered to a human infant of less than 2 months of age.
Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) Viruses
The invention encompasses any and all MVA viruses. Preferred MVA viruses include MVA variant strains such as MVA-BN (deposited at the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures, Vaccine Research and Production Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, United Kingdom (ECACC) on Aug. 30, 2000, under Accession No. V00083008), MVA-575 (deposited at ECACC on Dec. 7, 2000, under Accession No. V00120707), and MVA-572 (deposited at ECACC on Jan. 27, 1994 under Accession No. V94012707). Derivatives of the deposited strain are also preferred.
Preferably, the MVA has the capability of reproductive replication in vitro in chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) or other avian cell lines or in vivo in embryonated eggs, but no capability of reproductive replication in human cells in which MVA 575 or MVA 572 can reproductively replicate. Most preferably, the MVA has no capability of reproductive replication in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT, the human embryo kidney cell line 293 (also referred to as HEK293), the human bone osteosarcoma cell line 143B, and the human cervix adenocarcinoma cell line HeLa.
In preferred embodiments, the Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) virus is characterized by having the capability of reproductive replication in vitro in chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) and by being more attenuated than MVA-575 in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT, in the human bone osteosarcoma cell line 143B, and in the human cervix adenocarcinoma cell line HeLa. Preferably, the MVA virus is capable of an amplification ratio of greater than 500 in CEF cells. The “amplification ratio” of a virus is the ratio of virus produced from an infected cell (Output) to the amount originally used to infect the cells in the first place (Input). A ratio of “1” between Output and Input defines an amplification status wherein the amount of virus produced from the infected cells is the same as the amount initially used to infect the cells.
Recombinant MVAs
The invention encompasses recombinant MVA viruses generated with any and all MVA viruses. In one embodiment, the recombinant MVA virus is a recombinant MVA-BN virus. The recombinant MVA virus comprises at least one heterologous nucleic acid sequence. In the context of this invention, the term “heterologous” nucleic acid sequence refers to a nucleic acid sequence that is not naturally found in the MVA.
Preferably, the heterologous nucleic acid sequence is a sequence coding for at least one antigen, antigenic epitope, and/or a therapeutic compound. The antigenic epitopes and/or the antigens can be antigenic epitopes and/or antigens of an infectious agent. The infectious agents can be viruses, fungi, pathogenic unicellular eukaryotic or prokaryotic organisms, and parasitic organisms. In some embodiments, the infectious agent is a virus selected from any of the following: Rotavirus, Rubella virus, Poliovirus, Influenza virus, Flavivirus (particularly Dengue virus and Yellow Fever virus), Paramyxovirus (particularly measles virus, mumps virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)), Hepatitis virus (particularly Hepatitis A, B, and C viruses), Human immunodeficiency virus (particularly HIV-1), Filovirus (particularly Ebola virus and Marburg virus) or from other viruses causing hemorrhagic fever. In some embodiments, the infectious agent is a bacterium selected from any of the following: Bacillus anthracis, meningococcus, pneumococcus, Haemophilus influenza, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Clostridium tetani, Burkholderia, Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, or Bordetella pertussis.
Any antigen, including those that induce a T-cell response, can be expressed by the recombinant MVA of the invention. Viral, bacterial, fungal, and cancer antigens are preferred. Preferred antigens are antigens of any of the viruses or bacteria described above. HIV-1 antigens, Dengue virus antigens, anthrax antigens, measles virus antigens, influenza virus antigens, picornavirus antigens, coronavirus antigens and respiratory syncytial virus antigens are particularly preferred antigens. Preferably, the antigen is a foreign antigen or neoantigen. Within the context of this invention, the term “neoantigen” refers to an antigen not naturally expressed by the poxviral vector.
In some embodiments, the administration induces T- and/or B-cell responses against a heterologous antigen encoded by the recombinant MVA. The T-cell response can be an effector and/or long term memory T-cell response. The B-cell response can be a neutralizing antibody response.
Administration
The invention encompasses administration of a dose of an MVA to a human neonate or infant via any route. Preferred routes of administration include subcutaneous (s.c.), intradermal (i.d.), intramuscular (i.m.), in bone marrow (i.bm.) or intravenous (i.v.) injection, oral administration and mucosal administration, especially intranasal administration, or inhalation. The quantity to be administered (dosage) depends on the subject to be treated, considering among other things the condition of the patient, the state of the individual's immune system, the route of administration and the size of the host.
The invention further encompasses MVAs for use as a pharmaceutical composition or vaccine for vaccinating a human neonate or infant, the use of MVAs as pharmaceutical compositions or vaccines for treating a human neonate or infant, and the use of MVAs in the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions or vaccines or medicaments for treating or vaccinating a human neonate or infant.
The pharmaceutical composition, vaccine or medicament can generally include one or more auxiliary substances, such as pharmaceutically acceptable and/or approved carriers, additives, antibiotics, preservatives, adjuvants, diluents and/or stabilizers. Such auxiliary substances can be water, saline, glycerol, ethanol, oil, wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering substances, or the like. Suitable carriers are typically large, slowly metabolized molecules such as proteins, polysaccharides, polylactic acids, polyglycolic acids, polymeric amino acids, amino acid copolymers, lipid aggregates, or the like.
For the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions or vaccines or medicaments, the MVA according to the invention can be converted into a physiologically acceptable form. This can be done based on experience in the preparation of poxvirus vaccines used for vaccination against smallpox (as described by Stickl et al. 1974). The purified virus can be stored at −20° C., or −80° C., frozen in a liquid. Preferably, the virus has a titer of 5×108 TCID50/ml, and can be formulated in a buffered solution, for example, in 10 mM Tris, 140 mM NaCl, at pH 7.4.
The virus formulation can contain additional additives such as mannitol, dextran, sugar, glycine, lactose or polyvinylpyrrolidone or other auxiliary substances, such as antioxidants or inert gas, stabilizers or recombinant proteins (e.g., human serum albumin, or HSA) suitable for in vivo administration.
Alternatively, the vaccine can be produced by stepwise freeze-drying of the virus in a formulation. For example, 108 particles of the virus can be lyophilized in 100 μl to 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in the presence of 2% peptone and 1% HSA in an ampoule, preferably a glass ampoule. The glass ampoule is then sealed and can be stored between 4° C. and room temperature for several months. However, as long as no need exists the ampoule is stored preferably at temperatures below −20° C.
For vaccination or therapy, the virus can administered either systemically or locally, i.e., parenterally, subcutaneously, intravenously, intramuscularly, intranasally, or by any other path of administration known to the skilled practitioner.
Dose
The invention encompasses a dose of at least 108 TCID50 of an MVA administered to a human neonate or infant. Preferably, the dose is at least 108 TCID50, 2×108 TCID50, 3×108 TCID50, 4×108 TCID50, 5×108 TCID50, 6×108 TCID50, 7×108 TCID50, 8×108 TCID50, 9×108 TCID50, or 109 TCID50 of an MVA. A particularly preferred dose is 2×108 TCID50, 3×108 TCID50, 4×108 TCID50, 5×108 TCID50, 6×108 TCID50, 7×108 TCID50, 8×108 TCID50, 9×108 TCID50, or 109 TCID50 of an MVA. Especially preferred is a dose of 108 TCID50.
The human neonate or infant can be vaccinated with a single administration of the MVA in the absence of any additional (“boosting”) administrations. In other embodiments, one or more boosting administrations are administered. In one embodiment, a second administration is given four weeks to eight weeks after the first vaccination administration. Preferably, the second administration is given at 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks after the first administration. In other embodiments, a third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, or additional administration is given.
The boosting administration can be administered to increase immune response when the initial response decays or to further increase the initial response. Thus, in some embodiments a boosting administration is provided to augment or reestablish a desired level of immune response.
The time between the first and second administrations and between an administration and a subsequent administration can vary. In one embodiment, the time between administrations is two to six weeks. In various embodiments, the time between administrations is at least 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 30, or 52 weeks. In various embodiments, the time between administrations is at least 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, or 48 months. In various embodiments, the time between administrations is at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 years.
Protective Immune Response
The invention encompasses the induction of a protective immune response against a poxvirus by administration of a dose of an MVA to a human neonate or infant. Preferably the administration induces protective T- and B-cell responses against the poxvirus in the human neonate or infant prior to 6 months of age. Most preferably, the immune response is induced in the absence of a second administration of the MVA. Within the context of this invention, the phrase “the immune response is induced in the absence of a second administration of the MVA” means that the immune response does not depend on the administration of a second (i.e., boosting) dose of the MVA. The immune response is induced by the first administration. Thus, within the context of this invention, the phrase “the immune response is induced in the absence of a second administration of the MVA” does not mean that a second administration is not administered; it only means that a second administration is not required to induce the protective immune response. In some embodiments, a second or subsequent administration is administered. The second or subsequent administration can increase the level of the immune response and/or the longevity of the immune response.
The protective immune response can protect at least 75%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% of the neonates or infants to which the MVA is administered from death and/or disease symptoms.
Preferably, the protective immune response is against a poxvirus, particularly an orthopoxvirus. In some embodiments, the poxvirus is a vaccinia virus or a variola virus. Most preferably, the protective immune response is against smallpox.
Preferably, the protective immune response is induced in the human neonate or infant prior to 6 months of age. More preferably, the protective immune response is induced in the human neonate or infant prior to 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 months of age. Most preferably, the protective immune response is induced in the human neonate or infant within 4, 3, or 2 weeks of the administration.
Compositions
The invention encompasses pharmaceutical compositions and vaccines comprising at least 108 TCID50 of an MVA for administration to an infant or neonate to induce a protective immune response. Preferably, the composition comprises 108 TCID50, 2×108 TCID50, 3×108 TCID50, 4×108 TCID50, 5×108 TCID50, 6×108 TCID50, 7×108 TCID50, 8×108 TCID50, 9×108 TCID50, or 109 TCID50 of an MVA. A particularly preferred dose is 2×108 TCID50, 3×108 TCID50, 4×108 TCID50, 5×108 TCID50, 6×108 TCID50, 7×108 TCID50, 8×108 TCID50, 9×108 TCID50, or 109 TCID50 of an MVA. Especially preferred is a dose of 108 TCID50.
The following examples will further illustrate the present invention. It will be well understood by a person skilled in the art that the provided examples in no way may be interpreted in a way that limits the applicability of the technology provided by the present invention to this examples.
Time-mated C57BL/6J and BALB/c female mice were obtained from Harlan Winkelmann, whereas B-cell receptor/T11μMT transgenic, activation-induced cytidine deaminase-deficient (AID-deficient), MHC class I/β2m-deficient, T-cell receptor βδ deficient and FLT3-deficient mice on a C57BL/6 background were obtained from the animal facilities of the University Zurich or Bavarian Nordic-Munich. Litters were of mixed gender. Pups were weaned at 4 weeks of age.
The MVA used was MVA-BN, developed by Bavarian Nordic and deposited at ECACC under Accession No. V00083008 (see above). The recombinant MVA-measles vaccine MVA-mBN85B encodes 3 measles genes: the Fusion-, Hemagglutinin- and Nucleo-proteins. The gene sequences were derived from RNA of measles strain Khartoum SUD/34.97 (Genotype B3). Both viruses were propagated and titrated on primary chicken embryo fibroblasts that were prepared from 11-day-old embryonated, pathogen-free hen eggs (Charles River, Mass., USA) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. ECTV strain Moscow was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) under Accession No. VR-1372, and was propagated and titered on Vero C1008 cells (ECACC Accession No. 85020206), maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FCS without antibiotics. All viruses were purified through a sucrose cushion.
Mice were immunized subcutaneously within 6-24 hours after birth with 50 μl of viral suspension. 8-weeks old animals were used for the comparison of newborns to adults (i.e., adults were 8-weeks old). 1×108 TCID50 MVA or MVA-mBN85B was applied, except for some animals that received either a lower dose (2×106 TCID50) or 1×108 TCID50 of UV-inactivated MVA. Samuelsson et al., J. Clin. Invest. 118, 1776-1784 (2008). Control animals were treated with TRIS-buffered saline, pH 7.7. For MVA-mBN85B, mice were immunized twice three weeks apart. For immunogenicity studies, animals were bled and sacrificed at different time points and spleens were processed for flow cytometric analyses.
For ECTV challenge, mice were anaesthetized with ketamine/xylamine and virus was applied intranasally in a volume of 25 μl, except for 2-week old animals, which received virus in a volume of 12.5 μl. For each age group and mice strain, the optimal dose inducing 100% death within 2 weeks and with approximately a viral load of 8 Log10 pfu in necropsied lung was determined. For 29-day old mice, the optimal dose was 1×104 TCID50 (4 times the LD50 determined for adult C57BL/6J mice; Samuelsson et al., J. Clin. Invest 118, 1776-1784 (2008)), except for the FLT3-deficient and TCRβδ-deficient mice. In these highly susceptible mice, 1×103 TCID50 of ECTV was sufficient. For 2-week- and 7 week-old mice, the challenge dose was 1×102 TCID50 and 3×104 TCID50, respectively. After challenge, weight loss sickness and death were monitored daily for 21 days. 5 to 7 pups were included in each group and data are representative of two or three experiments.
ECTV plaque assay was used to determine the viral load in necropsied lung. Lungs were homogenized and titered on Vero C1008 cells using four-fold serial dilutions starting at 1:100. After 3 days of incubation and a crystal violet staining (Sigma Aldrich), the titer was calculated from the first dilution step that revealed a mean plaque number ≦150.
Vaccinia-specific serum IgG titers were measured by direct ELISA as described previously. Garza et al., Vaccine 27, 5496-5504 (2009). Briefly, 96-well plates were coated overnight with MVA antigen. Test sera were titrated using twofold serial dilutions starting at 1:50. A sheep anti-mouse IgG-HRP (AbD Serotec) was used as detection antibody. The antibody titers were calculated by linear regression and defined as the serum dilution that resulted in an optical density of 0.30 at OD450. Measles-specific serum IgG titers were measured with the Enzygnost® ELISA kit (Dade Behring), but using the sheep anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase.
Vaccinia-based PRNT assay was performed as described in Garza et al. Vaccine 27, 5496-5504 (2009). Briefly, heat-inactivated sera were serially diluted and incubated with vaccinia virus Western Reserve (Advanced Biotechnologies Inc.). After incubation the mixtures were allowed to adsorb on Vero cells for 70 minutes. Then, overlay medium was added and plates were incubated for 24 hours. After staining with Crystal Violet, the neutralizing titer was determined as the serum dilution which was able to neutralize 50% of the mature virus.
After erythrolysis, a part of the splenocytes were incubated 5 hours with or without the B8R-peptide (Tscharke et al., J. Exp. Med. 201, 95-104 (2005)) (5 μg/ml B8R20-27), Coring) in the presence of GolgiPlug™ (BD Biosciences). Cells were then stained with anti-CD8+-eFluor™-450, anti-CD4+-eFluor™-780, anti-CD44-FITC, anti-CD62L-PercP-Cy5.5, anti-CD127-APC, anti-IFNγ-PE-Cy7 (all eBioscience) and anti-Granzyme B-PE (Invitrogen). Intracellular staining was performed after fixation/permeabilization (BD Cytofix/Cytoperm™, BD Biosciences). Flow cytometric analysis was performed using an LSR II (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star). The rest of the splenocytes were stimulated 20 hours with or without B8R/vaccinia- or N/measles-specific (Halassy et al., Vaccine 24, 185-194 (2006); Bergen et al., PLoS one 5(4):e10297, 2010) peptides (5 μg/ml; aa 335-345; N) and IFNγ-secreting cells were detected by ELISpot assay (BD Biosciences). The stimulation index was obtained by subtracting the number of unspecific spots from non-stimulated cells from the number of spots obtained with the specific stimulation.
Newborn mice were immunized at birth with a high dose (lx 108 TCID50) or low dose (2×108 TCID50) of MVA used previously in newborn mice. Franchini et al., J. Immunol. 172, 6304-6312 (2004). Vaccinia-specific IgG antibody responses were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) performed 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 weeks post-immunization (
ain percent
bgeometric mean titer
The B-cell response induced by a single immunization with MVA-BN at birth was still detectable 16 weeks after immunization (
In order to investigate the functionality of the T- and B-cell responses induced by MVA immunization at birth even further, the intranasal ECTV challenge model was adapted to young mice. Four weeks post-neonatal immunizations with a low or high dose of MVA, animals were challenged via the intranasal route with 1×104 TCID50 ECTV. All control mice treated with placebo (Tris-buffered saline, TBS pH 7.7; 1.21 mg/ml TRIS-(hydroxymethyl)-amino-methane, 8.18 mg/ml sodium chloride) died 9 to 12 days post-challenge (
It has previously been shown that injection of MVA at birth boosts early development of pDC and leukocyte precursors via an increase of FLT3 ligand (FLT3-L), which led to an increased resistance to viral infections in the first week of life. Franchini et al., J. Immunol. 172, 6304-6312 (2004); Vollstedt et al., Eur. J. Immunol. 36, 1231-1240 (2006). Therefore, the role of FLT3-L in the protection against lethal ECTV challenge was investigated using FLT3-L knockout mice. These mice have about tenfold less pDC than C57BL/6 wild type mice and are unable to up-regulate pDC. In addition, these mice lack other cell types of the innate immune system. Vollstedt et al., Eur. J. Immunol. 36, 1231-1240 (2006). FLT3-L knockout mice were immunized with MVA at birth and challenged 4 weeks later with 1×103 TCID50 ECTV. All vaccinated mice survived the infection (
The role of the adaptive immune response in the protection afforded by neonatal immunization was investigated. T-cell receptor βδ (TCRβδ) knockout mice are devoid of T-cells and are also unable to mount a vaccinia-specific B-cell response due to the absence of T-helper cells. TCRβδ knockout mice vaccinated with MVA at birth succumbed 11 to 12 days after an intranasal challenge with 1×103 TCID50 ECTV, arguing for the requirement of an adaptive immune response for protection (
The role of cellular versus humoral immune responses in protection was examined. The fact that 2-week-old mice were protected at a time when T-cell responses but hardly any antibodies could be detected led to the notion of a dominant role for T-cells in protection of newborn mice. Indeed, in the absence of CD8+ T-cells in β2m knockout mice, immunization with MVA did not induce protection, (
The fact that a single immunization with MVA at birth induced short and long term protective immunity suggests an opportunity for its use as viral vector to develop childhood vaccines. Therefore the potential of recombinant MVA as vaccine against childhood disease was analyzed using MVA-Measles in the neonate mouse model. MVA-Measles encodes three different measles virus proteins within the MVA backbone: the hemagglutinin- and fusion-proteins involved in binding and fusion with the host cell, as well as the nucleocapsid-protein associated with the viral single strand RNA. As seen for neonatal vaccination with MVA, recombinant MVA-Measles also elicited strong vaccinia-specific B- and T-cell responses after immunization at birth and boost 3 weeks later. More importantly, also Measles-specific B- and T-cell responses were readily detectable (
This application is a National Phase application under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/000693, filed Mar. 14, 2014, and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/788,722 filed Mar. 15, 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/000693 | 3/14/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/139687 | 9/18/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5211114 | Chaplin | May 1993 | A |
5471902 | Chaplin | Dec 1995 | A |
6761893 | Chaplin | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6913752 | Chaplin | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7097842 | Suter | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7189536 | Chaplin | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7335364 | Chaplin | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7384644 | Chaplin | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7445924 | Chaplin | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7459270 | Chaplin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7501127 | Howley | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7628980 | Suter | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7892533 | Suter | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7897156 | Ackermann | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7923017 | Chaplin | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7939086 | Chaplin | May 2011 | B2 |
7964395 | Chaplin | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7964396 | Chaplin | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7964398 | Chaplin | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8021669 | Howley | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8029800 | Howley | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8163293 | Chaplin | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8197822 | Howley | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8198088 | Howley | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8236560 | Chaplin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8268325 | Chaplin | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268329 | Chaplin | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8309098 | Howley | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323661 | Howley | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8372622 | Suter | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8470598 | Chaplin | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8808709 | Chaplin | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9265823 | Chaplin | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20030202988 | Chaplin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206926 | Chaplin | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215466 | Chaplin | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224018 | Ackermann | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050214323 | Chaplin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050260156 | Suter | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271688 | Chaplin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060127984 | Ackermann | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060188961 | Howley | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060280758 | Chaplin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080089907 | Chaplin | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080317778 | Chaplin | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090017536 | Chaplin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090104224 | Ackermann | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090169579 | Chaplin | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100011451 | Chaplin | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100048683 | Suter | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100119545 | Chaplin | May 2010 | A1 |
20100183663 | Howley | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100196992 | Howley | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100279386 | Chaplin | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110052627 | Chaplin | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110135683 | Chaplin | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142877 | Chaplin | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159032 | Suter | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110172407 | Chaplin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182932 | Chaplin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182933 | Chaplin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110217757 | Chaplin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110306093 | Howley | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120009214 | Howley | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014922 | Howley | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015423 | Howley | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120107359 | Chaplin | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135032 | Chaplin | May 2012 | A1 |
20120183574 | Chaplin | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120276613 | Chaplin | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120328650 | Chaplin | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140322265 | Chaplin | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140341946 | Chaplin | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150174238 | Steigerwald | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150209421 | Cheminay | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160030551 | Cheminay | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO03088994 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2009152969 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Virapur. TCID50 Assay Protocol. http://www.virapur.com/protocols/TCID50%20Protocol.pdf. Jan. 20, 2011. |
“Immunization Schedules for Infants and Children.” CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/downloads/parent-ver-sch-0-6yrs-bw.pdf. Updated May 4, 2016. |
Rosario M, Fulkerson J, Soneji S, Parker J, Im EJ, Borthwick N, Bridgeman A, Bourne C, Joseph J, Sadoff JC, Hanke T. Safety and immunogenicity of novel recombinant BCG and modified vaccinia virus Ankara vaccines in neonate rhesus macaques. J Virol. Aug. 2010;84(15):7815-21. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00726-10. Epub May 19, 2010. |
Hatherill et al., Safety and Immunogenicity of MVA85A Prime and Bacille Calmette-Guerin Boost Vaccination (MVA(TB)029), Clinical Trials.gov. Jan. 2013. |
Walsh et al., Safety and Immunogenicity of Modified Vaccinia Ankara in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial, Journal of Infectious Diseases, 207: 1888-97. Mar. 12, 2013. |
Zhu et al., Evaluation of Recombinant Vaccinia Virus-Measles Vaccines in Infant Rhesus Macaques with Preexisting Measles Antibody, Virology 276: 202-213 (2000). |
Van Rompay et al. Immunization of Newborn Rhesus Macaques with Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Vaccines prolongs Survival after Oral Challenge with Virulent SIVmac251, Journal of Virology, 77: 179-190. |
Scriba et al., Dose-Finding Study of the Novel Tuberculosis Vaccine, MVA85A, in Healthy BCG-Vaccinated Infants, Journal of Infectious Diseases, 203: 1832-43 (2011). |
Marthas et al., Partial efficacy of a VSV-SIV/MVA-SIV vaccine regimen against oral SIV challenge in infant macaques, Vaccine, 29: 3124-3137 (2011). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT/EP2014/000693, dated Jun. 24, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160030551 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61788722 | Mar 2013 | US |