N/A
N/A
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to mixer circuits and more particularly to a single side band mixer incorporating digital logic switching elements and field effect transistors (FETs) in order to accomplish signal mixing over a wide frequency range including direct current (DC) levels.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A mixer is an electronic circuit that performs frequency conversion by multiplying two signals, a function that is applicable to many areas of radio and other high frequency communications systems. The most prevalent use for a mixer circuit is in a radio circuit to obtain an intermediate frequency (IF) signal by multiplying a radio frequency (RF) signal by a local oscillator (LO) signal. The simplest mixer circuit uses a single diode, but for increased performance more sophisticated circuits are often used.
For high frequency applications, the two main types of mixers are switching mixers and nonlinear mixers. Switching mixers include both single balanced and double balanced types, and nonlinear mixers use a nonlinear device such as a schottky diode, field effect transistor (FET) or other transistor to perform the multiplication function. Switching mixers also require a nonlinear device for performing the mixing function. An advantage of the double balanced mixer is that it can isolate the two input signals from each other and from the output signal, thus allowing the bandwidths of the two input signals to overlap without producing noise in the form of spurious signal artifacts.
A mixer circuit has three terminals that in general use are identified as the radio frequency (RF) terminal, the local oscillator terminal (LO), and the intermediate frequency terminal (IF). The RF terminal is where the high frequency signal is applied when the desired output will be the IF signal at a lower frequency, also known as a downconverted signal, or where the high-frequency signal is output when an IF input signal is upconverted. The LO signal is generally the stronger input signal, and is used to modulate the FETs with a switching action that effectively reverses the path of the signal between the other two terminals. In the case of a downconverter, the IF terminal is where the RF signal that was modified by the LO signal is passed. In the case of an upconverter, the IF terminal and the LO terminal have the input signals that are multiplied to produce the higher frequency RF output signal.
As stated hereinabove, a mixer may be used to convert a signal down in frequency (as in a radio receiver) or up in frequency. When two sine waves are multiplied or beat against each other, the result includes both sum and difference frequencies. This can be expressed as:
sin(ω1t)×sin(ω2t)=½{(cos [(ω1−ω2)t]−cos [(ω1+ω2)t]}
In a single sideband (SSB) mixer, either the sum or the difference frequency will be used but not both. Efficient and complete removal of the unused frequency is necessary to prevent noise. A high-side mixer is one in which the LO is higher in frequency than the RF, a low-side mixer is one in which the LO is lower in frequency. When an SSB mixer is used in a downconverter or most receiver circuits, the conversion loss is the difference in amplitude of the available RF signal to the IF signal output. In an upconverter application, the conversion gain is the difference in amplitude from the IF signal to the RF signal.
Since the operation of a mixer depends on a nonlinear device, there are unavoidably some intermodulation products generated along with the desired output signal. Of particular concern are the third order intermodulation products, which in a receiver circuit are close in frequency to the fundamental IF frequency and thus are difficult to filter out. These products affect the maximum dynamic range for the mixer. The measurement used to define this maximum dynamic range is taken to be the point on a curve of the RF input versus the IF output where the desired output signal and the third order intermodulation products have equal amplitude as the RF input is raised. This point at which the power of the fundamental IF signal equals the power of the third order product is called the third order intercept point or IP3, and input IP3 is used as an important figure of merit for the quality of a mixer circuit. The output third order intercept point is defined as the difference between the input IP3 and the conversion loss, where higher conversion losses result in a lower output IP3.
An example of a double-balanced single sideband mixer with a high IP3 is taught by U.S. Pat. No. 6,957,055 entitled DOUBLE BALANCED FET MIXER WITH HIGH IP3 AND IF RESPONSE DOWN TO DC LEVELS. This circuit uses FETs as nonlinear elements to accomplish the mixer function, but also incorporates several balun transformers to allow a signal path down to DC. Having the circuit's IF frequency response reaching down to DC allows the mixer to be used in in-phase quadrature (I/Q) modulators, which are useful in circuits including certain types of phase-locked loops (PLLs).
The improved single sideband mixer circuit described herein provides improved output noise floor and frequency resolution, and a wide frequency bandwidth while maintaining circuit simplicity, low component cost and low power consumption. This circuit is implemented with digital logic elements and FETs and can be entirely fabricated on an integrated circuit (IC) with standard IC fabrication processes.
The SSB mixer comprises a pair of quadrature generators and frequency dividers and a mixer-splitter circuit comprising a pair of mixers and a 2 way/0° splitter. Each quadrature generator is composed of an inverter and a pair of T-type flip-flops, and in response to a signal input produces signal outputs phase-shifted by 0°, 90°, 180° and 270°. These outputs are each at half the respective input frequency and are each fed into one of the mixers, and the mixer outputs are fed into the 2 way/0° splitter to produce the output signal. For receiver circuit use, the input signals are an RF signal and an LO signal, and the output is an IF signal. For uses such as an I/Q modulator, the inputs are an LO signal and an IF signal, and the output is an RF signal.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a single sideband mixer circuit with a frequency bandwidth ranging from DC to at least 2000 MHz.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a single sideband mixer circuit with an improved noise floor.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a single sideband mixer circuit with an improved frequency resolution.
It is a yet another object of the present invention to provide a single sideband mixer circuit capable of being fabricated on an integrated circuit.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a single sideband mixer circuit that requires no balun transformers to operate.
It is a feature of the present invention to use quadrature generators, frequency dividers and mixer-splitter to realize the single sideband mixer circuit.
It is another feature of the present invention that the single sideband mixer circuit is realized by use of field effect transistors (FETs), digital logic inverters and T-type flip-flop gates.
The present version of the invention will be more fully understood with reference to the following Detailed Description in conjunction with the drawings of which:
The invention described herein is a single sideband mixer circuit constructed from digital logic elements and FETs, and capable of being constructed entirely on an integrated circuit.
The single side band mixer 10 circuit is shown in
Or
but it will not be both expressions at once.
The mixer-splitter circuit 30 comprising a first mixer 20, a second mixer 22 and a combiner realized by a 2-way/0 degree splitter 26 is shown in a more essential component form in
This SSB mixer circuit has advantages over the prior art including the ability to function from DC up to the lower of the maximum frequencies of the inverter and T flip-flops. Typical prior art SSB mixer circuits are only useful over a very narrow frequency band due to the limited bandwidth of the internal 90 degree splitters employed. The typical lower frequency to upper frequency ratio in these prior art SSB mixer circuits is on the order of 1.1:5.
Additional advantages result from this SSB mixer circuit being built of digital logic elements and FETs. The entire circuit can be realized in an integrated circuit, especially since the digital logic elements may in turn be composed of FETs. Since FETs are easily and economically fabricated in minimal space and in a wide range of IC fabrication processes, the entire circuit can be very cost-effective. Alternatively, the flip-flops and inverters, which in downconverters need to operate at higher frequencies than the FETs, can be fabricated in an IC process that includes the capability of producing higher speed logic elements such as Emitter-Coupled Logic (ECL) gates.
Prototyping and testing a circuit meant to be realized as a high-frequency integrated circuit out of discrete devices is an expensive and time-consuming task, and the physical realization has sources of error including mismatch between the discrete devices, mismatch between path lengths at higher frequencies and inaccurate frequency response due to disparities in actual versus intended device sizes. For many high-frequency circuit development applications, a more cost-effective and potentially more accurate way to evaluate circuit performance is the use of advanced computer models to simulate circuit performance.
An example of a high-frequency circuit modeling system is the Agilent Advanced Design System (ADS) which was created to assist with electronic design automation. Software of this type assists in the design of electronic circuitry intended to be incorporated in devices such as cellular and portable phones, pagers, wireless networks, and radar and satellite communications systems. In such a circuit modeling system, there are groups of equations for each type of circuit element. The user selects and connects the desired circuit elements, to which signal inputs are then applied and circuit response measured at selected nodes. The value and general methods of use of these modeling tools is well understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art.
The ADS output display shown in
One application for the SSB mixer circuit as an improved I/Q modulator is in frequency synthesizer circuits, as shown in
improves the Output Noise Floor but simply increasing the comparison frequency to the maximum possible level has the disadvantage with a given PLL circuit of leading to a poor frequency resolution, as the comparison frequency also determines the frequency resolution of the frequency synthesizer.
In the past, an approach to resolving this problem has been to add an I/Q modulator between the output of the VCO 76 and the input of the integer divider 80. (Note that the VCO output is also identified as the frequency output signal for the frequency synthesizer.) An I/Q modulator functions by modulating two orthogonal data streams onto a common carrier. If the phases and amplitudes of both data stream (in-phase “I” and quadrature “Q”), then one of the sidebands is completely cancelled out. In this manner, the frequency resolution of the frequency synthesizer is the same as the I/Q modulator and can be as low as a few Hertz.
Disadvantages of adding a standard I/Q modulator into the circuit include difficulties in operating the I/Q modulator at high frequencies and generating the two 90 degree I/Q (quadrature) signals necessary for operation, as well as requiring a separate I/Q modulator for every frequency band.
A more versatile and robust approach is to replace the standard I/Q modulator with the single side band mixer 10. As shown in
Another circuit incorporating the SSB mixer of the present invention as an I/Q modulator in a frequency synthesizer is shown in
Having described herein illustrative embodiments and best mode of the present invention, persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate various other features and advantages of the invention apart from those specifically described above. It should therefore be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications and additions can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the appended claims shall not be limited by the particular features that have been shown and described, but shall be construed also to cover any obvious modifications and equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3913037 | Himono et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
4224572 | Will | Sep 1980 | A |
4979233 | Kawahata | Dec 1990 | A |
5006811 | Kruger | Apr 1991 | A |
5027163 | Dobrovolny | Jun 1991 | A |
5060298 | Waugh et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5280647 | Arai et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280648 | Dobrovolny | Jan 1994 | A |
5361409 | Vice | Nov 1994 | A |
5513390 | Vice | Apr 1996 | A |
5534830 | Ralph | Jul 1996 | A |
5640132 | Ralph | Jun 1997 | A |
5640699 | Ralph | Jun 1997 | A |
5731740 | van de Westerlo | Mar 1998 | A |
5732345 | Vice | Mar 1998 | A |
5740528 | Drennen | Apr 1998 | A |
5774801 | Li et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799248 | Vice | Aug 1998 | A |
5854974 | Li | Dec 1998 | A |
5867072 | Logothetis | Feb 1999 | A |
5903820 | Hagstrom | May 1999 | A |
5987315 | Nishida | Nov 1999 | A |
6108529 | Vice et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6140892 | Uda et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6263198 | Li | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275687 | Lloyd | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278872 | Poulin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6317590 | Nash et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343211 | Thodesen et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348830 | Rebeiz et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6427069 | Galin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438563 | Kawagoe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6587699 | Olsen et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6611696 | Chedester et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6653885 | Wu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653910 | Escalera et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665546 | Slaughter et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6714800 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6804500 | Yamaguchi | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807407 | Ji | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6917796 | Setty et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6937456 | Pasternak | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947717 | Daxion | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957055 | Gamliel | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959180 | Ji | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7013122 | Gamliel | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027795 | Ji | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7072636 | Dobrovolny | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7305217 | Kirkhart | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7324796 | Ji | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7616063 | Gamliel | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7680474 | Kirichenko et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |