The present invention generally relates to the management of thermal energy generated by electronic systems, and more particularly to a heat pipe-related device and method for efficiently and cost effectively routing and controlling the thermal energy generated by various components of an electronic system.
Semiconductors are continuously diminishing in size. Corresponding to this size reduction is an increase in the power densities of semiconductors. This, in turn, creates heat proliferation problems which must be resolved because excessive heat will degrade semiconductor performance. Heat pipes are known in the art for both transferring and spreading heat that is generated by electronic devices.
Heat pipes use successive evaporation and condensation of a working fluid to transport thermal energy from a heat source to a heat sink. Heat pipes can transport very large amounts of thermal energy in a vaporized working fluid, because most working fluids have a high heat of vaporization. Further, the thermal energy can be transported over relatively small temperature differences between the heat source and the heat sink. Heat pipes generally use capillary forces created by a porous wick to return condensed working fluid from a heat pipe condenser section (where transported thermal energy is given up at the heat sink) to an evaporator section (where the thermal energy to be transported is absorbed from the heat source). Heat spreader heat pipes can help improve heat rejection from integrated circuits. A heat spreader is a thin substrate that absorbs the thermal energy generated by, e.g., a semiconductor device, and spreads the energy over a large surface of a heat sink.
Heat pipe wicks for cylindrical heat pipes are typically made by wrapping metal screening of felt metal around a cylindrically shaped mandrel, inserting the mandrel and wrapped wick inside the heat pipe container, and then removing the mandrel. Wicks have also been formed by depositing a metal powder onto the interior surfaces of the heat pipe, whether flat or cylindrical, and then sintering the powder to create a very large number of intersticial capillaries. Typical heat pipe wicks are particularly susceptible to developing hot spots where the liquid condensate being wicked back to the evaporator section boils away and impedes or blocks liquid movement. In many prior art heat pipes, this hot spot effect is substantially minimized by maintaining the average thickness of the wick within relatively close tolerances.
Powder metal wick structures in prior art heat pipes have several well documented advantages over other heat pipe wick structures. One draw back to these wicks, however, is their relatively low effective thermal conductivity compared their base metal, referred to in the art as their “delta-T”. Traditional sintered powder metal wicks have a thermal conductivity that is typically an order of magnitude less than the base metal from which they are fabricated. In a conventional smooth wick heat pipe, there are two modes of operation depending upon the heat flux at the evaporator. The first mode occurs at lower heat fluxes, in which heat is conducted through the wick with the working fluid evaporating off of the wick surface. The second mode occurs at higher heat fluxes, in which the temperature gradient required to conduct the heat through the relatively low conductivity wick becomes large enough so that the liquid contained in the wick near the heat pipe enclosure wall becomes sufficiently superheated that boiling is initiated within the wick itself. In this second mode, vapor bubbles are formed at and near wall/wick interface and subsequently travel through the wick structure to the vapor space of the heat pipe. This second mode of heat transfer can be very efficient and results in a lower over all wick delta-T than the first, conduction mode. Unfortunately, the vapor bubbles exiting the wick displace liquid returning to the evaporator area leading to premature dry out of the evaporator portion of the wick.
Ideally, a wick structure should be thin enough that the conduction delta-T is sufficiently small to prevent boiling from initiating. Thin wicks, however, have not been thought to have sufficient cross-sectional area to transport the large amounts of liquid required to dissipate any significant amount of power. For example, the patent of G. Y. Eastman, U.S. Pat. No. 4,274,479, concerns a heat pipe capillary wick structure that is fabricated from sintered metal, and formed with longitudinal grooves on its interior surface. The Eastman wick grooves provide longitudinal capillary pumping while the sintered wick provides a high capillary pressure to fill the grooves and assure effective circumferential distribution of the heat transfer liquid. Eastman describes grooved structures generally as having “lands” and “grooves or channels”. The lands are the material between the grooves or channels. The sides of the lands define the width of the grooves. Thus, the land height is also the groove depth. Eastman also states that the prior art consists of grooved structures in which the lands are solid material, integral with the casing wall, and the grooves are made by various machining, chemical milling or extrusion processes. Significantly, Eastman suggests that in order to optimize heat pipe performance, his lands and grooves must be sufficient in size to maintain a continuous layer of fluid within a relatively thick band of sintered powder connecting the lands and grooves such that a reservoir of working fluid exists at the bottom of each groove. Thus, Eastman requires his grooves to be blocked at their respective ends to assure that the capillary pumping pressure within the groove is determined by its narrowest width at the vapor liquid interface. In other words, Eastman suggests that these wicks do not have sufficient cross-sectional area to transport the relatively large amounts of working fluid that is required to dissipate a significant amount of thermal energy.
The present invention provides a grooved sintered wick for a heat pipe comprising a plurality of individual particles which together yield an average particle diameter. The grooved sintered wick further includes at least two lands that are in fluid communication with one another through a particle layer disposed between at least two lands where the particle layer comprises at least one dimension that is no more than about six average particle diameters. In this way, vapor bubbles are not formed at a wall/wick interface to subsequently travel through the wick structure to the vapor space of the heat pipe. This mode of heat transfer is very efficient and results in a lower over all wick delta-T.
A heat pipe is also provided comprising an enclosure having an internal surface and a working fluid that is disposed within the enclosure. A grooved wick is disposed on at least a portion of the internal surface that includes a plurality of individual particles having an average diameter. The grooved wick includes at least two lands that are in fluid communication with one another through a particle layer disposed between the at least two lands that comprises less than about six average particle diameters.
A method for making a heat pipe wick on an inside surface of a heat pipe container is also presented where a mandrel having a grooved contour is positioned within a portion of a heat pipe container. A slurry of metal particles is provided having an average particle diameter and that are suspended in a viscous binder. At least part of the inside surface of the container is then coated with the slurry so that the slurry conforms to the grooved contour of the mandrel and forms a layer of slurry between adjacent grooves that comprises no more than about six average particle diameters. The slurry is dried to form a green wick, and then heat treated to yield a final composition of the heat pipe wick.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully disclosed in, or rendered obvious by, the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts and further wherein:
This description of preferred embodiments is intended to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings, which are to be considered part of the entire written description of this invention. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features of the invention may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form in the interest of clarity and conciseness. In the description, relative terms such as “horizontal,” “vertical,” “up,” “down,” “top” and “bottom” as well as derivatives thereof (e.g., “horizontally,” “downwardly,” “upwardly,” etc.) should be construed to refer to the orientation as then described or as shown in the drawing figure under discussion. These relative terms are for convenience of description and normally are not intended to require a particular orientation. Terms including “inwardly” versus “outwardly,” “longitudinal” versus “lateral” and the like are to be interpreted relative to one another or relative to an axis of elongation, or an axis or center of rotation, as appropriate. Terms concerning attachments, coupling and the like, such as “connected” and “interconnected,” refer to a relationship wherein structures are secured or attached to one another either directly or indirectly through intervening structures, as well as both movable or rigid attachments or relationships, unless expressly described otherwise. The term “operatively connected” is such an attachment, coupling or connection that allows the pertinent structures to operate as intended by virtue of that relationship. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described, suggested, or rendered obvious by the written description or drawings for performing the recited function, including not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures.
Referring to
In one preferred embodiment, bottom wall 15 and a top wall comprise substantially uniform thickness sheets of a thermally conductive material, e.g., copper, steel, aluminum, or any of their respective alloys, and are spaced-apart by about 2.0 (mm) to about 4.0 (mm) so as to form the void space within heat pipe heat spreader 2 that defines a vapor chamber. The top wall of heat pipe heat spreader 2 is often substantially planar, and is complementary in shape to bottom wall 15. In the following description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, evaporator section 5 will be associated with bottom wall 15 and condenser section 7 will be associated with those portions of heat pipe heat spreader 2 that do not comprise a grooved wick, e.g. a top wall or side walls. It will be understood, however, that such an arrangement with regard to the structure of the metal envelope that defines heat pipe heat spreader 2 is purely arbitrary, i.e., may be reversed or otherwise changed, without departing from the scope of the invention.
Bottom wall 15 preferably comprises a substantially planer outer surface 20, an inner surface 22, and a peripheral edge wall 23. Peripheral edge wall 23 projects outwardly from the peripheral edge of inner surface 22 so as to circumscribe inner surface 22. A vapor chamber is created within heat pipe heat spreader 2 by the attachment of bottom wall 15 and a top wall, along their common edges which are then hermetically sealed at their joining interface 40. A two-phase vaporizable liquid (e.g., water, ammonia or freon not shown) resides within the vapor chamber, and serves as the working fluid for heat pipe heat spreader 2. Heat pipe heat spreader 2 is completed by drawing a partial vacuum within the vapor chamber after injecting the working fluid just prior to final hermetic sealing of the common edges of bottom wall 15 and the top wall. For example, heat pipe heat spreader 2 may be made of copper or copper silicon carbide with water, ammonia, or freon generally chosen as the two-phase vaporizable liquid.
Referring to
Significantly groove-wick 45 is formed so as to be thin enough that the conduction delta-T is small enough to prevent boiling from initiating at the interface between inner surface 22 of bottom wall 15 and the sintered powder forming the wick. Groove-wick 45 is an extremely thin wick structure that is fed by spaced lands 42 which provide the required cross-sectional area to maintain effective working fluid flow. In cross-section, groove-wick 45 comprises an optimum design when it comprises the largest possible (limited by capillary limitations) flat area between lands 42. This area should have a thickness of, e.g., only one to six copper powder particles. The thinner groove-wick 45 is, the better performance within realistic fabrication constraints, as long as the surface area of inner surface 22 has at least one layer of copper particles. This thin wick area takes advantage of the enhanced evaporative surface area of the groove-wick layer, by limiting the thickness of groove-wick 45 to no more than a few powder particles. This structure has been found to circumvent the thermal conduction limitations associated with the prior art.
It is to be understood that the present invention is by no means limited only to the particular constructions herein disclosed and shown in the drawings, but also comprises any modifications or equivalents within the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation application of copending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/422,878 filed on Apr. 24, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3537514 | Levedahl | Nov 1970 | A |
3598180 | Moore, Jr. | Aug 1971 | A |
3613778 | Feldman, Jr. | Oct 1971 | A |
3675711 | Bilinski et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3681843 | Arcella et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3788388 | Barkmann | Jan 1974 | A |
4042316 | Rabe | Aug 1977 | A |
4046190 | Marcus et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4118756 | Nelson et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4177646 | Guadagnin et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4231423 | Haslett | Nov 1980 | A |
4274479 | Eastman | Jun 1981 | A |
4327752 | Hickel | May 1982 | A |
4354482 | Beisecker | Oct 1982 | A |
4361133 | Bonnema | Nov 1982 | A |
4365851 | Andres et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4366526 | Lijoi et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4374528 | Tittert | Feb 1983 | A |
4382448 | Tittert | May 1983 | A |
4489777 | Del Bagno et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4503483 | Basiulis | Mar 1985 | A |
4557413 | Lewis et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4616699 | Grote | Oct 1986 | A |
4641404 | Seydel et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4697205 | Eastman | Sep 1987 | A |
4748314 | Desage | May 1988 | A |
4765396 | Seidenberg | Aug 1988 | A |
4777561 | Murphy et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4807697 | Gernert et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4819719 | Grote et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4830097 | Tanzer | May 1989 | A |
4840224 | Dietzsch | Jun 1989 | A |
4865729 | Saxena et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4880052 | Meyer, IV et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4883116 | Seidenberg et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4885129 | Leonard et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4912548 | Shanker et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4921041 | Akachi | May 1990 | A |
4929414 | Leonard et al. | May 1990 | A |
4931905 | Cirrito et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4960202 | Rice et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4982274 | Murase et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5059496 | Sindorf | Oct 1991 | A |
5076352 | Rosenfeld et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101560 | Leonard et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5103897 | Cullimore et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5148440 | Duncan | Sep 1992 | A |
5160252 | Edwards | Nov 1992 | A |
5200248 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5219020 | Akachi | Jun 1993 | A |
5242644 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253702 | Davidson et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5268812 | Conte | Dec 1993 | A |
5283715 | Carlsten et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5320866 | Leonard | Jun 1994 | A |
5331510 | Ouchi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333470 | Dinh | Aug 1994 | A |
5349237 | Sayka et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5408128 | Furnival | Apr 1995 | A |
5409055 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5522455 | Brown et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5549394 | Nowak et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5642776 | Meyer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5664890 | Nowak et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5711816 | Kirlin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5769154 | Adkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5826645 | Meyer, IV et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5847925 | Progl et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5880524 | Xie | Mar 1999 | A |
5883426 | Tokuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5947193 | Adkins et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950710 | Liu | Sep 1999 | A |
6041211 | Hobson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055157 | Bartilson | Apr 2000 | A |
6056044 | Benson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6082443 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6148906 | Li et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154364 | Girrens et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158502 | Thomas | Dec 2000 | A |
6167948 | Thomas | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169852 | Liao et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6227287 | Tanaka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230407 | Akutsu | May 2001 | B1 |
6239350 | Sievers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256201 | Ikeda et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6293333 | Ponnappan et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302192 | Dussinger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303081 | Mink et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6382309 | Kroliczek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388882 | Hoover et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397935 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418017 | Patel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6536510 | Khrustalev et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050236143 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10422878 | Apr 2003 | US |
Child | 11128454 | US |