This present invention relates to a surgical instrument, which uses a novel surgical guidance system including a microprocessor having memory loaded with appropriate software and one or more sensors in order to track and/or recommend the orientation and movement over time of a work piece or implant in a surgical field using a locally defined coordinate system such that the surgical guidance system provide surgical assistance by means of a specifically designed graphical user interface on an associated display, to a surgeon at a economically efficient cost. The invention further relates to a method of surgery that uses this instrument and may include information stored in the system memory based on generalized information, such as the location of openings in implants or preferred angles for insertion or incision, or on information which is specific to particular patient anatomy or surgical need. In a further embodiment, the invention relates to an aid or jig that is used to define the local coordinate system.
Surgeons, and in particular orthopedic surgeons have become accustomed to the use during surgery of mechanical devices, which act to aid the surgeons in their work. Such devices include, for example, depth and drill guides, and jigs, which help the surgeon to align fasteners with bone and with openings in implants so as to provide for the optimal alignment in the bone/implant/fastener construct. This is particularly important in instances where fastener seats first in the bone, and then locks, such as through a threaded relationship with the implant.
Recent developments in surgery recognize the advantage of a surgical approach, which is less invasive than previous techniques, which required relatively large incisions to provide open access to the ultimate surgical field or work site. These relatively new “minimally invasive” procedures work through small incisions, and may even call for procedures to be performed percutaneously, or through the skin. Such approaches provide less insult to the surgical environment, and therefore result in shorter healing times, and ultimately better surgical outcomes. However, they also result in a more limited surgical visibility of the area where the surgeon may be developing a construct including for example, the bone, fasteners, and an implant. Consequently, device developers have designed mechanical means, such as jigs and guides, which help to locate components of the construct during surgical implantation (for example by providing a template for the implant system) in a minimally invasive procedure, including related fasteners or surgical aids such as k-wires. While these means do provide additional guidance, they tend to be awkward to use, and to obscure the surgical view in their own way. Moreover, they are limited to a particular placement and orientation, and do not assist in the variable location in space over time of a component of the construct (for example, they can not account for the reduction of a bone fragment which may change the desirable location of a fastener within that bone fragment.)
Partly in response to trends in surgery realizing the value of electronic assistance, and partly as hardware and software systems have developed to provide medical applications and increased accessibility, surgical navigation systems and robotic devices have been developed to provide increased electro/mechanical assistance to surgeons. Current surgical navigations systems utilize a vast array of complex sensors and imaging systems in order to aid the surgeon in visualizing the real time relative position and orientation of an instrument in 3-dimensional space. They also act in a generally defined global coordinate system which requires rigorous control of the surgical field in relation to that global coordinate system. These surgical navigation systems typically use 3D computer aided tomography and complex imaging functions to allow the surgeons a re-created vision in real-time of the surgical site. Consequently, these systems have extremely high costs to buy and to use (often resulting in institutional ownership such as by the hospital or highly capitalized medical holding groups). Thus, the use of surgical navigation is often limited to certain high margin, high expense and high risk procedures, such as brain or hip replacement surgery and are typically not used by surgeons focused on extremities or by other surgeons, including for example plastic surgeons, podiatrists and oral surgeons.
Moreover, these surgical navigation systems are typically provided in an operating arena that includes complex lighting, monitors, biological function and monitoring systems, and imaging systems and screens such as CT and fluoroscopy systems. While these systems are robustly capable in providing information to the surgeon, the accompanying surgical technique requires the surgeon to rely almost solely on the imaging screen and guide placement, while maintaining more than mere peripheral focus on the actual patient and operating site. This situation constantly requires the surgeon to refocus his or her attention, leading to frustration, muscle strain and fatigue. This increases the potential of complications in the surgery where injury and even loss of life can result from attendant post-operative troubles.
The problem with these surgical navigation systems, apart from the very high cost, is that the system results in inherent distraction due to the layout of the displays. In addition, there is a long learning curve associated with the use of these systems, as well as the cost for the associated CT/MRI data collection required pre-op which tend to limit the application of these systems to high grossing procedures. Although these displays and imaging systems represent “cutting edge” surgical instrumentation and guidance systems, they increase distraction and stress on surgeons by requiring a greater degree of multi-tasking, and intense focus on multiple locations.
The present invention provides an integration of key advantages of these systems into a more “information dense” surgical guidance or “surgical targeting” aid, but one which is within the line of sight of the surgeon as well as the procedure's actual location (i.e. within the actual, not a virtual, patient). In large part, this is due to the compact size of the guidance system, the use of a localized co-ordinate system, the provision of the system display in line with the use of the surgical instrument and in fact, on the instrument itself, and a graphical user interface (“GUI”) that is designed to maintain the focus of the surgeon on the location of the instrument and on the work piece as an extension of the instrument, rather than splitting the surgeon's focus onto a displaced screen and the surgical instrument, as well as the actual body area of interest.
This invention uses a six or nine degree of freedom (“DOF”) Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)—to track rotations and accelerations in all three spatial directions by means of using Micro Electrical Mechanical System (MEMS) devices that are cross referenced with a MARG (Magnetic, Angular Rate, and Gravity) sensor, so that 3D spatial orientation and motion can be tracked by converting angular rate to angular position, and acceleration to position through numerical integration. An “LVDT” or linear potentiometer, measures capacitance or inductance that is proportional to physical position to determine position, which could be utilized in order to measure input distances for the system. Thus, the present invention provides a low cost (i.e. having the potential for individual surgeons to own or even for single use) guidance system, which acts as an aid to surgeons, rather than as a substitute for their skills and judgment.
In accordance with the present invention, a surgical targeting guide is provided which provides a local reference coordinate system defined by the placement of a linear marker, such as a k-wire, and optionally a simple jig to define the optimal placement points, where the guide enhances the surgeon's ability to remain focused and augments his or her skill in operating as per his or her judgment. The invention allows the surgeon to place a sensor and provide [an axis] a vector for a reference position. Thus, the marker or pin is used in which two points are used to define a relative 3-D coordinate system. These two points are at a fixed distance which are known in 3-D and can be used to identify critical features (i.e. biological landmarks) which allows the surgeon to better locate and hold his or her position without the use of cumbersome or fussy jigs and guides.
The guidance system of the present invention includes a 9 degree of freedom (DOF), three axis accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer sensor that could be used to track such motion and orientation (which has a typical retail cost between $15 to $40). This sensor, when integrated into a system that contains a microcontroller and a visual display, could be rigidly attached to the surgeon's drill or saw to provide attitude (i.e., orientation relative to a set of defined axes) and positional guidance during surgery. The display could be attached to the drill or wire guide, or the drill or wire driver, or a cutting tool, such as a saw or burr advantageously with a pattern with a defined entry and exit site. The cutting tool can include electronics and software integrated into the tool with the display through a heads up display such as glasses, and the targeting guide can include safety parameters integrated into the system. The device can be optimized for specific procedures, including for example, hip, knee, and spinal surgeries. The device can be modified to provide the visual representation of a simulated anatomy for use or for training, and the device can be optimized for soft tissue biopsies to minimize the need for CT guided biopsies.
In use, a reference axis is defined along with two relative reference positions, to provide all of the information required to know the dynamics of the system (i.e. surgical instrument orientation and position relative to the reference position and direction determined from the surgery site.) More specifically, the system needs to define, at minimum, three points that do not lie on the same line in order to determine a frame of reference. This can be done by either defining three points in space, two intersecting lines of known length and the point of intersection, or a line of known length and two points (one at the terminal point of the line and one not on the line, where points referring to true positions in a relative reference frame.) Thus, the invention includes a physical, or a virtual jig or template that can use a reference axis, such as is provided by a guide wire implanted at the surgical site, and an orthogonal axis is defined by a point on an arm placed at a right angle to the first axis. In a specific embodiment, a jig encircles the guide wire and has a sliding arm which can be extended along a bone surface and used to define the optimal location of a point at a selectively defined distance from the intersection of the axis at a right angle. Means can also be provide to define horizontal, such as a level bubble, which helps to define the right angle for the second axis.
In order to obtain the real time position, acceleration outputted from the accelerometer is mathematically integrated twice. This integration can compound bias error and begin to accumulate position drift if the error signal is not compensated for. Orientation is obtained from integrating the time rate change of angular position (angular velocity) once to obtain the real time angular position. From these outputs, the difference in the initial angular position and reference position can be shown on the display in order to perform the orientation and positional corrections needed.
The display of the present invention provides a GUI (graphical user interface) comprising a spot on a plot (which is advantageously circular or at least two-dimensional such as referential axes or cross-hatching) where the surgeon has the goal of locating the spot in the plot to cause the instrument (such as a drill or screw driver) to act on axis. A second GUI displays a relative depth such as by a bar graph (for example to locate the distal end of a drill tip or a fastener) so as to provide visual assistance as to the desired amount of penetration.
As a further aspect of the invention, a method of surgery is provided in which relates generally to surgery in which a MEMS sensor guidance system is mounted on an instrument and in the sight line of the surgeon and which uses the MEMS sensor to determine Inertial Measurement Units to track rotation and acceleration in all three spatial directions. In accordance with this method, the surgical area is excised to allow access to the area for surgical intervention and a reference axis is set, for example by drilling a pilot hole, inserting a k-wire such as along an axis which a fastener will intersect and defining a reference axis by registering two points on the k-wire at a known spaced distance. Next, a loci is defined, for example, an entry point for a fastener; and a depth is determined by measuring a boundary distance for the intervention (e.g., when a fastener will be inserted into a bone segment, the thickness of the bone is measured which represents the depth beyond which the surgeon does not wish to penetrate in order to avoid disturbing the soft tissue beyond the cortical surface on the back side of the bone segment). This depth is recorded in a memory of the instrument in accordance with the invention as a value, dy. Next, a value is determined along an orthogonal axis, x, which can be determined using an actual horizontal jig that includes an indication for a fastener entry hole, or a virtual version of the jig which is provided in the microprocessor of the instrument. Then, the instrument including the sensor cluster of the invention is placed in relation to the y-axis and x-axis and the device is calibrated using the button marked “calibrate alignment” on this sensor interface display, after assuring that the axes are properly aligned, for example by checking to be sure that the alignment jig is parallel to the line made with the marked fastener entry location and the centroid axis of the k-wire. The jig can be provided with a sliding arm to define the second point, and with leveling means to ensure the orientation. Then, with the instrument in place, the working end is aligned to the area of intervention, for example, for a drill, the distal end of the drill bit in the drill is aligned to the fastener entry location and the orientation data is displayed on the display screen in the GUI as a green circle, and the fastener orientation is determined and maintained by aligning a fastener icon displayed on the instrument sensor cluster screen in the proper positioning on the alignment marker and by monitoring the degree of work on the secondary work monitor, for example on a graphical representation of the depth or degree of penetration in the Y-axis. This procedure helps to ensure the optimal placement for surgical intervention, for example, for the placement of a pilot hole in order to assure the subsequent alignment and full seating of a fastener, such as a screw having a threaded locking head in relation to a projected internally threaded locking screw hole in an orthopedic implant. As final steps of the method in accordance with the invention, the alignment is repeated as necessary for the placement of all fasteners, and the surgical access or incision is closed. It is also possible to use other means to help define the local coordinate system, such as a beam of light, or other “virtual” templates. Local coordinates can also be obtained from pre-operative CT or MRI scans or intra-operative fluoroscopy. The targeting device helps to keep the surgeon's hand “on target”, for example, through the use of a touchscreen in which measurement inputs are placed to define entry and end points with the use algorithms inputted to the IC.
The system includes integral or access to memory (for example in a mobile device, such as a cell phone) which can be programmed for the placement of a plurality of fasteners, or with information that can be general information for specific procedures, such as angles for osteotomies, or can be information relative to individual patients. The method of the present invention is particularly advantageous for use in minimally invasive procedures, and procedures in which fasteners are introduced percutaneously, or through the skin.
The guidance system 10 of the present invention as illustrated in
The guidance system 10 has a sonar sensor cluster or sensor array 12 that includes at least (and possibly only) a 9 degree of freedom (DOF) three axis accelerometer 32, gyroscope 34, and magnetometer 36 sensor that could be used to track such motion and orientation. This sensor cluster 12 is further integrated into a system that contains a microcontroller 38 and a visual display 40 (preferably both integrated into a single unit, but where the microcontroller 38 or display 40 could be accessed remotely by the sensor cluster, including, for example, on a mobile device, such as a cell phone). The required capabilities of the microprocessor are comparable to the capabilities of the Arduino Mega 2560 microcontroller with a ATmega 2560 microprocessor with 256 KB flash memory, 8 KB of SRAM, 4 KB EEPROM, and a clocking speed of 16 Mhz. Thus, the guidance system is advantageously integrated into or attached to the surgeon's instrument, 20 such as a drill or saw to provide feedback to the surgeon with respect to orientation relative to a defined axis (i.e. “attitude”) as well as positional guidance (meaning the ability of the system to direct the surgeon to maintain a desired position during surgery (together, attitude and position comprise a vector). The guidance system 10 defines a reference 100 along with a relative reference position 102, to provide the information required to know the dynamics of the system (i.e. surgical instrument orientation and position relative to the reference position and direction determined from the surgery site.) In order to obtain the real time position, the microprocessor 38 uses the data from the acceleration and mathematically integrates it twice. Since this integration can compound bias error and begin to accumulate position drift, the error signal is compensated for using a defined offset or a specific algorithm in a software component of the invention. Orientation is obtained from integrating the time rate change of angular position (angular velocity) once to obtain the real time angular position and these outputs, the difference in the initial angular position and reference special position can be shown on the display 40 in order to allow the surgeon to perform the orientation and positional corrections needed In order to match the directional output of the GUI 42 on the display 40 of the guidance system10.
The display 40 of the present invention provides a GUI 42 (graphical user interface) which for example, includes a targeting or guidance mechanism 46 such as a spot 47 on a plot 48 (which is advantageously circular) where the surgeon has the goal of centering the spot 47 in the plot 48 to cause the instrument (10 such as a drill or screw driver) to work on axis 104 relative to the defined reference 100. A second GUI provides a bar graph 110, which displays a relative depth (for example for the distal end of a drill tip or a fastener) to provide visual assistance as to the desired amount of penetration of the drill bit or fastener.
As an alternative to, or in addition to the display, the guidance system can include an audio alert system, for example, a series of beeps or buzzing that can either increase or decrease volume, tempo of frequency in order to present information to the guidance user, for example by increasing the tempo as the work piece comes to it's desired location. In addition, the guidance system can include safety means, such as stops to avoid drilling too deep or in the wrong location.
In further embodiment, the mechanical jig 210 that is illustrated in
As a further aspect of the invention, a method of surgery is provided which relates generally to surgery in which a MEMS sensor guidance system 10 is mounted on an instrument 20 and which uses the MEMS sensor 12 to determine Inertial Measurement Units to track rotation and acceleration in all three spatial directions. One such method of surgery is illustrated as a chevron cut bunionectomy, although it is understood that it can be used for other surgeries, for example, for fusion such as for the placement of a compression screw, or for any small or long bone or spinal or maxofacial surgery, for example using a plate or implant that is fixed relative to a bone or bones, by a fastener, such as a screw, or many other surgical procedures.
In accordance with this method, the surgical area is prepped, such as for example by excision to allow access to the area for surgical intervention (or in the case of minimally invasive surgery to allow an implant to be placed without a fully opened incision). Next, a reference axis is set, for example by drilling a pilot hole, in the bone 310 (having a chevron incision 311) and inserting a k-wire 312 such as along an axis which a fastener will intersect and defining a reference axis by registering two points on the k-wire at a known spaced distance, in the memory of the microprocessor. Next, a loci is defined, for example, an entry point 314 for a fastener 316; and a depth is determined by measuring a boundary distance for the intervention (e.g., when a fastener will be inserted into a bone segment, the thickness of the bone is measured which represents the depth beyond which the surgeon does not wish to penetrate in order to avoid disturbing the soft tissue beyond the cortical surface on the back side of the bone segment). This depth is recorded in a memory of the microprocessor of the instrument in accordance with the invention as a value, dy. Next, a value is determined along an orthogonal axis, x, which can be determined using an actual horizontal jig 318 that includes an indication for a fastener entry hole, or by a virtual version of the jig for example utilizing a reflected light beam instead of the metal jig and wherein the virtual jig is provided in the microprocessor of the instrument. Then, the instrument preferably including the sensor cluster of the invention is placed in relation to the y-axis and x-axis and the device is calibrated using the button marked “calibrate alignment” on this sensor interface display, after assuring that the axes are properly aligned, for example by checking to be sure that the alignment jig is parallel to the line made with the marked fastener entry location and the centroid axis of the k-wire. Then, with the instrument in place, the working end is aligned to the area of intervention, for example, for a drill, the distal end of the drill bit in the drill is aligned to the fastener entry location and the orientation data is displayed on the display screen such as by a green circle, and the fastener orientation is determined and maintained by aligning a fastener icon displayed on the instrument sensor cluster screen in the proper positioning on the alignment marker and by monitoring the degree of work on the secondary work monitor, for example on a graphical representation of the depth or degree of penetration in the Y-axis. This procedure helps to ensure the optimal placement for surgical intervention, for example, for the placement of a pilot hole in order to assure the subsequent alignment and full seating of a fastener, such as a screw having a threaded locking head in relation to a projected internally threaded locking screw hole in an orthopedic implant. As final steps of the method in accordance with the invention, the alignment is repeated as necessary for the placement of all fasteners, and the surgical access or incision is closed.
The method of the present invention is particularly advantageous for use in minimally invasive procedures, and procedures in which fasteners are introduced percutaneously, or through the skin.
In accordance with the present invention, various procedures can be performed with the assistance of the instrument guidance system, including for example, inserting fasteners including with up-loaded specific information as to the relative location of a plurality of fasteners or of the relative location of bone fragments for typical fracture patterns, or in the case of reconstruction, the angle of incision for example by maneuvering the desired axis over time, since the present system has the advantage of allowing a rate change of orientation to be monitored. Likewise, the device can be used to access patient specific information, which might be gathered on the basis of pre-surgical imaging including for example, fluoroscopy, MRI, tomography and x-ray imaging.
While in accordance with the patent statutes the best mode and preferred embodiment have been set forth, the scope of the invention is not limited thereto, but rather by the scope of the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5230338 | Allen et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230623 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5724264 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5957934 | Rapoport | Sep 1999 | A |
5980526 | Johnson | Nov 1999 | A |
6019724 | Gronningsaeter et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6711432 | Krause et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725082 | Sati et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6785571 | Glossop | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6980849 | Sasso | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7073271 | Raab et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7217276 | Henderson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7302288 | Schellenberg | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7427200 | Noble et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7458977 | McGinley et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7586546 | Lee et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7771436 | Moctezuma de la Barrera et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7840254 | Glossop | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8073528 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8114086 | Claypool et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8147503 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165658 | Waynik et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8167823 | Nycz et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8442621 | Gorek et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8491579 | Rossetto | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8516711 | Pettersson | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8709016 | Park et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8832954 | Atwell et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8961537 | Leung et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9119572 | Gorek et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9144470 | Proulx et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9179987 | Goodacre | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9283047 | Namiki | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9283048 | Kostrzewski et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9341704 | Picard et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351782 | Stein et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9452023 | Boillot et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9510771 | Finley | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9532839 | Seo | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9554812 | Inkpen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9561082 | Yen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9636185 | Quaid et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9639156 | Iorgulescu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9662179 | Nam et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9706948 | Bhandari | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9707043 | Bozung | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9730608 | Lugt et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9750510 | Kostrzewski et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9782229 | Crawford et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9925013 | Dell et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9964398 | Becker et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9974613 | Kang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9986768 | Force | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10004609 | Palmatier et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10018706 | Cisi | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10034713 | Yang et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10058338 | Shoham | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10080617 | Haider et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10105149 | Haider et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10136952 | Couture et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10176625 | Bridges | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10194990 | Amanatullah et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10299874 | Weitzner et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10350014 | Beelen et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10357184 | Crawford et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10368878 | Lavallee et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10531926 | Roessler | Jan 2020 | B2 |
20030059097 | Abovitz | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040243148 | Wasielewski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050020909 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060142657 | Quaid | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173291 | Glossop | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070249986 | Smego | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270686 | Ritter | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287911 | Haid et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090177081 | Joskowicz | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110275957 | Bhandari | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120071757 | Salcudean et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120203092 | Sweeney et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120319859 | Taub et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330367 | Roche et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130016185 | Stolka et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130132026 | Lippuner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130165947 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169423 | Iorgulescu | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172907 | Harris | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140107471 | Haider | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140148808 | Inkpen | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163557 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140276871 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150355310 | Gong et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160022374 | Haider et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160119529 | Stolka et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160166338 | Hartmann et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191887 | Casas | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160220320 | Crawford et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160220385 | Falardeau | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160242934 | van der Walt | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160338776 | Jaramaz et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160357260 | Raynor et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170245781 | Kay et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170327371 | Bai | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180064496 | Hladio et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180242967 | Meade | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2570336 | Jan 2013 | CA |
104271046 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104656095 | May 2015 | CN |
10333012 | May 2007 | DE |
0730210 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1570782 | Jul 2005 | EP |
4265698 | May 2009 | JP |
5763666 | Apr 2013 | JP |
6370789 | Dec 2015 | JP |
2009027191 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2015085011 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2020160120 | Aug 2020 | WO |
2020172397 | Aug 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mendes et al., Ethylene oxide sterilization of medical devices: A review, Nov. 2007 (Year: 2007). |
Andres et al., Laser-guided lumbar medial branch kryorhizotomy, Sep. 2010 (Year: 2010). |
Ajuied et al., “Saw Cut Accuracy in Knee Arthroplasty—An Expiremental Case-Control Study”, Journal of Arthritis; pp. 1-5, vol. 4, Issue 1; Published 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 29, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 22, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170245781 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62301257 | Feb 2016 | US | |
62358739 | Jul 2016 | US |