This disclosure is generally related to behaviors and actions that can be executed by an autonomous or semi-autonomous robot to appear more human-like and/or comply with social protocols.
In order to improve communication among hospital staff, healthcare professionals, patients, and other applicable parties in various locations, a robot may serve as a remote presence communication device. The robot may be capable of autonomous or semi-autonomous navigation through a healthcare facility with little or no manual intervention. The robot may drive in a manner such that it avoids both stationary and moving obstacles and people in its path.
In addition to avoiding contact with obstacles and people, the robot may move in harmony with social protocols and expectations. For example, this may include providing suitable space between itself and people, as well as moving in an unobtrusive manner so as not to alarm staff or visitors. Further, the robot may move fluidly within that context. The robot may also be capable of acting as a member of a group, enabling it to assist in group activities and procedures within a healthcare facility environment.
Disclosed herein are various embodiments of robots, robot behaviors, and methods for robots to achieve the various behaviors. According to various embodiments, the systems and methods disclosed herein may facilitate communication among medical professionals, staff, and patients. In addition, the systems and methods described herein facilitate the autonomous navigation of robots while engaging in human behaviors and obeying social protocols. For example, a doctor in a remote location may cause a robot to drive down a hallway to a patient's room. As the robot autonomously navigates to the patient's room, the robot may acknowledge and greet a human as it passes en route to a patient room.
The base 102 supports the robot 100 and may include a drive system for moving the robot 100 about a work area. The base 102 may include any associated motors, batteries, wheels, or the like to move the robot 100. The upper portion 104 supports the head 106 and houses various component of the robot 100. The upper portion 104 may also provide various features and interfaces to allow a person to interface with the robot 100. For example, the upper portion 104 includes a display interface 108 that displays information about the robot 100 and/or allows a user to select different options to control the robot 100. Other ports, button, lights, or the like may be used to interface with the robot 100. In one embodiment, the upper portion 104 is configured to rotate independently of the base 102.
The head 106 represents a head of the robot 100 and includes a display screen 110 and a sensor housing 112. The display screen 110 may be used to selectively display video of a remote user, a caricature corresponding to a personality of the robot 100, or any other information. The display screen 110 may be configured to display a live video feed from a remote operator and/or a persona of the robot 100, itself. For example, the display screen 110 may display the face of a doctor remotely using the robot 100 for tele-consultations. When autonomously navigating, the robot 100 may have a personality portrayed through a caricature, face, icon, or other characteristic on the display screen 110.
The sensor housing 112 may house a variety of sensors such as microphones, cameras, range detector devices, or the like. For example, a video camera configured to capture a video feed of a point of view of the robot 100 may be captured and transmitted to a remote user. The video camera may also be used in conjunction with a range finding device, such as a laser range finder, to detect objects, humans, or other surrounding features that affect navigation of the robot 100. In one embodiment, the head 106 is able to rotate independently of the upper portion 104 and/or the base 102. In another embodiment, the head 106 is not rotatable with respect to the upper portion 104 and/or the base 102.
The robot 100 also includes lights 114 distributed on the surface of the robot 100. The lights 114 may be used to indicate a current status of the robot 100, reflect a personality of the robot 100, indicate an emergency, create a desired mood for a location within a work area, or indicate any other information to nearby humans. The robot 100 may also include additional lights, input devices, output devices, and/or a variety of other sensors that will be discussed below.
The drive system 202 may include one or more motors, wheels, or other hardware to move the robot 100. The drive system 202 may be configured for navigation on a variety of surfaces such as concrete, linoleum, carpet, or the like. In one embodiment, the drive system 202 is configured to provide traction and the ability to move through many of the environments found in a hospital. In one embodiment, the drive system 202 is an omnidirectional drive system that allows the robot 100 to move in any direction.
The control system 204 is configured to control the robot 100. The control system 204 may receive input from the various other components, such as components 202, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, and 216, and generate instructions to move or otherwise control the robot based on the input. For example, the control system 204 may be configured to control the drive system 202 to navigate the robot 100 around a work area.
The control system 204 may be configured to control the robot 100 according to a variety of different operating modes. In one embodiment, the control system 204 is configured to operate the robot 100 according to an autonomous mode. In the autonomous mode, the control system 204 may control the robot 100 to navigate and perform a variety of tasks with no human input. For example, the control system 204 may cause the robot 100 to navigate through a work area and/or perform tasks without human input.
In one embodiment, the control system 204 may cause the robot to perform tasks it is capable of performing on its own and request help from a human when needed. For example, the robot 100 may be configured to open closed doors, request help with closed doors, and/or wait for a closed door to be opened. For example, automatic doors may be opened by the robot 100. The robot 100 may include a key fob or other identifying tag or information to open secure access doors. The robot 100 may be configured to monitor for people following it through secure areas and provide an appropriate alert. In some embodiments, the robot 100 may wait patiently for a door to open or actively request assistance from nearby humans. The robot 100 may have a time out period after which it may find a new path that does not require the door to be opened. Alternatively, the robot may wait patiently for a predetermined amount of time, after which it may begin requesting help. In some embodiments, the robot 100 may track statistics associated with the amount of time it waits or receives help at each door and utilize the information during route planning.
The robot 100 may be configured to proactively request human help if it is presented with a situation that it is not programmed to respond to. The robot 100 may request help via various methods, such as sending an SMS or other electronic message, using its display interface 108 to communicate its need for assistance, or utilizing other communication methods. In some embodiments, a remote operator can be summoned for manual assistance with the situation, allowing the robot 100 to reassert its autonomy.
In a semi-autonomous mode, the control system 204 may receive instructions from a user and then operate autonomously to accomplish the instructions. For example, a user may provide an instruction to navigate to a specific patient room. The control system 204 may then navigate to the patient room autonomously, accounting for objects, individuals, routes, or other information to arrive at the room in a timely and safe manner. The control system 204 may receive input from the other components 202, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, and 216 to navigate in a social and safe manner.
In a manual mode, the control system 204 may perform instructions as provided by a user. For example, a user may remotely drive the robot 100 using a joystick or other input device or method and the control system 204 may cause the drive system 202 to move the robot 100 in the manner defined by the user. Of course, some aspects of the operation of the robot 100 may still be automated and may not require explicit instruction from a user. In any of the manual, semi-autonomous, or autonomous modes, a user may be able to remotely operate (or tele-operate) and/or view information provided by the robot 100.
According to one embodiment, changes in operation mode may be accompanied by variations in restrictions on the operation of the robot 100. For example, the robot's maximum allowed speed in a manual mode may be increased, and the remote user may be able to navigate the robot 100 into regions from which the robot 100 may be locked out in an autonomous mode. In another embodiment, the remote user may be able to override obstacle avoidance to approach people or obstacles closely, or even touch them. This may be specifically useful during teleoperated consultations, such as with a coworker, client, or patient.
With regard to humans present with the robot 100, the robot 100 may contain manual intervention functions such that a person may stop or delay the robot 100. These may be useful if the robot 100 is getting in the way of current events in the work area or to prevent accidents or other problems. In some embodiments, the display interface 108 may contain a large “stop” button, which when pressed may cause the robot 100 to halt motion and display a “resume” button. A person may thereby stop or delay the robot 100 until the person manually resume its motion, or until an internal timer sets the robot 100 back in motion. The robot 100 may also halt as a result of being manually shoved. In either case, the robot 100 may start an internal timer that will count down a pre-determined amount of time until the robot 100 resumes its course. In some embodiments, the display interface 108 may display a message that indicates how long before the robot 100 resumes motion. A person may have the option to set the robot 100 back into motion immediately by selecting a “resume” button, or to keep the robot 100 stopped by selecting a “remain stopped” button. In another embodiment, if the person selects the “remain stopped” button, the time the robot 100 is to remain halted will increase. The person may be able to select the “remain stopped” button a number of times to increase the halt time of the robot 100 up to a certain maximum time.
In other embodiments, the robot 100 may resume navigation and/or motion immediately after being shoved and/or a “stop” button is selected. In still other embodiments, the robot 100 may remain permanently stopped until further input is provided in response to a “stop” button being pushed and/or in response to a shove. The robot 100 may be configured to go into a freewheel mode when stopped, such that the robot 100 is able to be moved or shoved out of the way. In some embodiments, the robot 100 may selectively enter a freewheel mode depending on the surface it is on. For example, it may not enter a freewheel mode if it detects that it is on an inclined surface. When stopped, the robot 100 may include an “enter freewheel mode” selection on the display interface 108 that may be selected to cause the robot 100 to enter the freewheel mode. A person present with the robot 100 may thereby be able to position the robot 100 in a location out of the way of a current procedure or event.
The object detection system 206 may detect the presence of an object, human, or other physical feature that is near the robot 100. The object detection system 206 may be used by the robot 100 to detect three-dimensional information about its environment and may provide this information to the control system 204 or other component to affect navigation of the robot 100. The object detection system 206 may use a variety of sensors, cameras, or other devices to detect information about the environment of the robot 100. For example, the robot 100 may include stereo cameras, a laser range finder, a radar system, a sonar system, and/or any other system for observing and/or detecting objects or features nearby.
The object detection system 206 may use any of a wide variety of known system and methods of motion detection, facial recognition techniques, and/or other detection algorithms to detect individuals and/or objects. For example, a robot or related system may utilize binary pattern-classification techniques, Viola-Jones object detection frameworks, speeded up robust features (SURF) as local descriptors for facial recognition and detection, edge matching (e.g., Canny edge detection), greyscale matching, gradient matching, histograms of receptive field responses, scale invariant feature transforms (SIFTs), and other techniques known in the art. Such techniques may also be fused with face-detection and/or used in combination.
The object detection system 206 may be configured to discern a human from other objects using any of the above methods and may further use motion detection, face detection, feature classification for body shapes, and/or other suitable techniques. The object detection system 206 may also be used to detect a type of object. For example, using methods such as SIFT-based object detection, the robot 100 may identify objects such as beds, chairs, carts on wheels, intravenous (IV) poles, open drawers, or other common objects.
The communication system 208 may be used to provide communication to and from the robot 100 to other devices and remote users. The communication system 208 may allow the robot 100 to communicate wirelessly with a control center, remote user, on-site workers or staff, or the like. The communication system 208 may allow instructions to be sent to the robot 100 and may allow the robot to provide information regarding its current location, status, or other information. For example, the communication system 208 may provide a captured video feed to a remote client and may receive a client video feed of a user at the remote client. The client video feed may be displayed on the display screen 110 for viewing by local humans.
The map component 210 may determine a location of the robot 100 within the work area. For example, the robot 100 may have access to maps for a healthcare facility or other work area. In one embodiment, the robot 100 may maintain, create, and/or download maps of its work area. The maps may be annotated and/or marked with various features and/or describe how the robot 100 should behave in various zones or regions. The map may include various areas that are off limits as well. Some regions or areas of a healthcare facility, hospital, or other work area may be unmapped. In some embodiments, the robot 100 should avoid and/or be restricted from unmapped areas. In some embodiments, the robot 100 may avoid unmapped areas in an autonomous mode, but allow for manual tele-operation within the unmapped regions. The robot 100 may be configured to warn a user when crossing a boundary between a mapped area and an unmapped area.
In one embodiment, map component 210 may be configured to map the unmapped areas as the robot 100 autonomously navigates or is tele-operated within unmapped areas. The robot may be configured to memorize a path within an unmapped area as it is operated in a manual or semi-manual mode sufficient for the robot 100 to retrace its path back to a mapped area. The robot 100 may then localize itself at the spot the robot 100 crossed the boundary.
The map component 210 may be able to determine where within a map the robot 100 is located. In some embodiments, the robot 100 may be configured to indicate locally (e.g., lights, audible warnings, a message on a display interface) or remotely (e.g., a wireless message) that it is lost when the map component 210 is unable to determine the location of the robot 100. A user may be alerted and help guide the robot 100 to a mapped region. The robot 100 may be guided locally, such as through a follow option described herein, or be tele-operated and manually driven to a mapped region.
Examples of mapping systems, tags, and robots, and interactions there between are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/360,579 filed on Jan. 27, 2012, titled “INTERFACING WITH A MOBILE TELEPRESENCE ROBOT,” which application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/360,590 filed on Jan. 27, 2012, titled “INTERFACING WITH A MOBILE TELEPRESENCE ROBOT,” which application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The social behaviors component 212 determines operations for the robot 100 to perform to operate according to social protocols to reduce anxiety or discomfort of nearby humans. For example, if a robot moves in an erratic manner or comes too close to nearby people, those people may be uncomfortable and may find the presence of the robot to make it harder to relax, move between locations, or go about their duties. The social behaviors component 212 may determine various actions for the robot 100 that allow the robot 100 to operate around others without being a distraction or causing problems. According to one embodiment, the social behaviors component 212 will determine actions or operations to be performed based on a detected status, environment, or individual. The social behaviors component 212 may cause the robot 100 to operate differently based on the detected status, environment, or individual.
The social path component 302 creates or modifies paths to maintain a socially acceptable distance from humans. In one embodiment, the social path component 302 creates paths based on the current status of the robot 100 or a detected person. In one embodiment, the current status includes the presence of a person. In one embodiment, the social path component 302 creates a path according to a first set of rules when a human is not present and creates a path according to a second set of rules when a human is present. In one embodiment, the first set of rules maximizes avoidance of collision with objects and the second set of rules maximizes collision avoidance with humans. For example, the first set of rules may cause the robot 100 to navigate down the middle of a navigable area, such as a hallway. This may maximize the distance between the robot and walls or objects near the walls. On the other hand, the second set of rules may cause the robot 100 to navigate down a side of the navigable area, such as to the left or the right of the center of the hallway when a human is detected. This may meet social expectations in the location of the robot 100. For example, in some cultures it is more common to stay to the right side of a pathway or hallway whereas in others it is more common to stay to the left side. The social path component 302 may cause the robot 100 to follow these customs when a person is detected.
Similarly, the distances between objects may vary between a set of rules for use when a human is not detected and a set of rules for use when a human is detected. For example, the social path component 302 may require that the robot 100 stay further away from objects when a human is not present than when a human is present. This may allow the robot 100 to provide a greater distance between the robot 100 and the human to help avoid collision with the human but also to allow the human to feel more comfortable. Similarly, a minimum distance between a human and the robot 100 may be greater than a minimum distance between an object and the robot 100.
The social path component 302 may be configured to cause the robot 100 to operate more efficiently and quickly when humans are not present than when humans are present. For example, the social path component 302 may allow for a greater top speed of the robot 100 as it travels a path without any humans around than when the humans are around. As another example, the social path component 302 may allow for a greater acceleration rate of the robot 100 as it travels a path without any humans around than when the humans are around.
The social path component 302 may be configured to cause the robot 100 to operate more predictably to a human when humans are present. This may allow for the human to be better able to predict the robot's path and thereby avoid the human bumping into the robot 100 or the robot 100 bumping into the human. Similarly, this may reduce the chance of the robot 100 getting closer to the human than the human would find comfortable. In one embodiment, the social path component 302 may cause the robot 100 to act more predictably to a human by reducing acceleration rates of the robot. These acceleration rates may include accelerations to speed up the robot 100, slow down the robot 100, or cause the robot 100 to change direction. Slower rates of acceleration may also be achieved by creating smoother and more rounded paths for the robot 100 to follow.
In one embodiment, the social path component 302 causes the robot 100 to reduce discomfort of nearby humans by observing a lockout zone and/or a comfort zone for each detected human.
According to one embodiment, the lockout zone 404 defines an area through which the robot 100 may not pass. The social path component 302 may create or modify any path to avoid the lockout zone 404. The comfort zone 406 defines an area through which the robot 100 may pass, but must do so at a reduced maximum speed. In one embodiment, the social path component 302 may avoid passing through the comfort zone 406 as long as it is faster to pass around the comfort zone than slow down while passing through the comfort zone 406. By observing the lockout zone 404 and the comfort zone 406, the robot 100 may avoid making people feel uncomfortable by violating their personal space.
The lockout zone 404 and comfort zone 406 are given by way of illustration only. Similar lockout zones 404 and/or comfort zones 406 may also be used in relation to objects. The social path component's 302 path planning may allow for a relatively large lockout zone 404 or buffer space for people and a relatively small lockout zone 404 or buffer space for objects. For example, the radius of the lockout zone 404 for objects may be limited to between 0.5 and 12 inches; whereas, the radius of the lockout zone 404 for humans may be between 18 and 36 inches. This lockout zone 404 may be variable, depending on the cultural context the robot 100 is in, the amount of available space, the identity of the person, a classification of the person, a zone within a work area where the person 402 and the robot 100 are located, and/or the urgency with which the robot 100 is navigating. In some embodiments, the size of the buffer zone may be selected by a user and/or disabled by a user, such as a user who is remotely operating the robot 100. Based on the cultural context, if the robot 100 is deployed in a crowded city, it may use a 12-inch radius for a lockout zone 404 for a human. However, if the robot 100 is deployed in a less crowded city, the social path component 302 may use an 18-inch radius for a lockout zone 404.
Lockout or buffer zones may be adapted and specified for particular objects, situations, and/or locations. Merely by way of example and not limitation, the Table 1 represents possible lockout radii and comfort zones for various objects:
In various embodiments, the robot 100 may be configured to maintain socially acceptable distances for a wide variety of situations. Examples of managing natural social distances and other human-like behavior that may be performed by the robot 100 are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/541,422 titled “COMPANION ROBOT FOR PERSONAL INTERACTION,” filed on Sep. 29, 2006, which application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. For example, the robot 100 may be configured to make various gestural cues as the robot 100 moves or interacts with people.
In various embodiments, the robot 100 may act in a manner consistent with social protocols with regard to its speed. For example, the robot 100 may decelerate its traveling speed when it comes within a larger comfort zone 406 of a person 402. For example, if the lockout zone 404 has a radius of 18 inches, the larger comfort zone 406 may have a radius of 24-48 inches. The robot 100 may decelerate when it nears or enters this larger comfort zone 406. In one embodiment, the robot 100 may have a maximum speed of 5 mph with no humans around, and may decelerate to 2 mph when it enters the larger comfort zone 406. Accordingly, the robot 100 may travel at an average human walking speed within the environment of a heath care facility, taking into account the natural tendency of humans to slow down when in crowded situations or when close to other humans. For example, the robot 100 may determine an average walking speed of a detected individual and maintain the same average speed.
The classification component 304 may classify a detected person. For example, a classification component 304 of a robot 100 in a hospital may classify a detected person as one or more of a patient, a visitor, and a hospital worker. The classification component 304 may classify a person based on facial recognition, detection of a badge or wireless identification tag on the person, by location within a wheelchair or bed, by location in a work area, and/or by physical features. For example, the robot 100 may classify patients from other humans in the facility using a method such a SIFT-based identification to distinguish people located on a bed, gurney, or wheelchair.
The social path component 302 may create a navigation path based on a classification of a nearby person. For example, when the robot 100 is near a patient or visitor in a hospital work area, the social path component 302 may afford greater distances to ensure that the visitor or patient is not disturbed. The social path component 302 may allow for a smaller lockout zone 404 or comfort zone 406 for hospital employees, such as doctors or nurses, than for visitors and patients.
The status determination component 306 determines a current status of the robot 100 or of a nearby person 402. For example, the status determination component 306 may determine whether there is an emergency, whether there is a human present, whether humans are engaged in a conversation, whether the robot 100 will navigate near an intersection, whether the robot 100 will navigate near a doorway, or other possible statuses of the robot 100 or a nearby person 402.
The status determination component 306 may determine that the current status includes nearby people involved in a conversation. The status determination component 306 may determine that two or more people are involved in a conversation and avoid passing between them. For example, the status determination component 306 may determine a conversation zone that includes a continuous region between the human and the one or more humans such that the telepresence robot cannot pass between the human and the one or more humans without passing through the conversation zone.
Similarly, the status determination component 306 may determine other groups of people and/or objects that the robot 100 should not pass between. In addition to attempting to abide by social protocols when navigating around humans, the robot 100 may also adhere to specific behavioral protocols when navigating around specific objects common to healthcare facilities. In some embodiments, the robot 100 may have special, pre-determined lockout radii and/or comfort zones for each respective object. Other objects may trigger special-case behaviors. For example, when the robot 100 finds a cable or cord, it may determine whether to traverse or avoid the cable depending on the cable's height. In other embodiments, the robot 100 may alter its behavior based on alerts or existing conditions. For example, the robot 100 may alter its behavior based on a “floor cleaning” sign. In such an example, the robot 100 may respond by slowing its speed to 50% and staying within a few inches of a wall. Another example may include the robot 100 detecting a patient with an IV pole or walker, which may cause the robot 100 to avoid navigating between the patient and the IV pole or walker.
The status determination component 306 may determine that the current status includes that the robot 100 is approaching a doorway or intersection. The status determination component 306 may determine that the robot 100 is approaching a doorway or intersection based on information detected by the object detection system 206 and/or based on a current location of the robot 100 as determined by the map component 210. The status determination component 306 may notify the social path component 302 of the upcoming doorway or intersection and the social path component 302 may determine a path to pass through the doorway or intersection while limiting chances of entering a lockout zone 404 of any people 402 or bumping into any objects or people. For example, the social path component 302 may determine an entry angle through the intersection or doorway to increase visibility to any approaching humans. Similarly, as the robot 100 approaches the doorway or intersection, the status determination component 306 and/or the social path component 302 may determine whether a human will reach the intersection within a threshold time of the robot 100. If the human and the robot 100 will likely cross around the same time the social path component 302 may modify a path of the robot 100 to avoid a lockout zone 404 for the human. The social path component 302 may change the path such that the robot 100 stops at the intersection, speeds up, slows down, or even moves sideways to avoid coming within a lockout zone 404 and/or comfort zone 406 of the human.
The social path component 302 may also avoid sudden, unexpected changes in direction or movements that might potentially surprise or disturb a human.
With respect to thresholds in doorways or intersections, the status determination component 306 may be configured to cause the robot 100 to slow down, approach thresholds at an angle, and/or approach the threshold squarely. In some embodiments, the robot 100 may have an omnidirectional drive system 202 configured to move in any direction, regardless of the orientation or angle of the base 102 relative to the motion. However, in some embodiments an omnidirectional base may be configured to climb or traverse a raised threshold or other object better at one angle than another. Accordingly, the status determination component 306 may be configured to orient its base 102 at the optimal angle relative to a threshold prior to traversing the threshold. For example, a three- or four-wheel base 102 may traverse a raised threshold better if it is oriented squarely with respect to the threshold, such that two wheels of the base 102 contact the raised threshold at the same time. In some embodiments, thresholds may be included in a map of the healthcare facility. For example, raised thresholds for doorways may be tagged or otherwise marked on a map used by the robot 100 for navigation. In some embodiments, the thresholds may be detected by the robot 100 as it approaches them.
The status determination component 306 may determine that the current status includes that the robot 100 is being delayed during navigation. The status determination component 306 may determine that the robot 100 is being delayed during navigation when a pathway is blocked by one or more individuals and objects for at least a delay time period. The robot 100 may encounter obstacles that prevent it from passing, such as a person 402, a group 602 of people, an object, or a combination thereof. The robot 100 may attempt to plan a navigational path to avoid breaching social rules for a specified timeout period, after which it may attempt to find a new route to its destination and/or violate the social rules. In some embodiments, the timeout period may be short, such as between 1 and 30 seconds, to avoid the robot 100 hovering or dodging around people in the hallway for a long period of time while they are talking or otherwise engaged in the hallways. In still other embodiments, the robot may ask people to step aside or move.
Returning to
Similarly, when located in narrow, crowded, or otherwise tight spaces, the robot 100 may leave a small buffer of space between itself and an object, but may pass relatively close to objects in order to navigate.
The status determination component 306 may determine that the current status includes that a nearby human is involved in an emergency. The status determination component 306 may determine that a nearby human is involved in an emergency based on how fast a nearby human is moving. For example, if the object detection system 206 detects that a human is moving at a fast pace down a hallway, the status determination component 306 may determine that the user is involved in an emergency or has an urgent task to perform. Similarly, the status determination component 306 may determine that a nearby person is involved in an emergency based on one or more of a speed of a moving object, a speed of a moving person, a warning sound, and flashing lights. In another embodiment, the robot 100 may detect the velocity of the approaching person or object and, if it is above a pre-determined threshold, determine that there is an emergency or dangerous situation. In this case, the robot 100 may move to the side of the hallway and wait until the passing person, group, and/or object has passed.
In one embodiment, upon determination that a person is involved in an emergency, the social path component 302 may determine a path to cause the robot 100 to move out of a high-traffic area, move out of the way of the person or object involved in an emergency, or the like. Returning to
The robot may be configured to detect or receive an indication of the urgency of the approaching object. For example, the speed of an approaching gurney may be indicative of the urgency of the situation. In another embodiment, a gurney may have a transmitter or lights that indicate the urgency of the situation. The robot 100 may respond by moving out of the way. The robot 100 may also be prohibited from loitering in high-traffic areas. For example, hallways may be marked as areas where the robot 100 should not stop, or in which the robot 100 should move to one side of the hallway if it does stop.
The robot 100 may be more sensitive to emergencies in an emergency department (ED) region. For example, the robot 100 may be more likely to stop and wait at the side when people move by. For example, the robot 100 may utilize the motion and velocity detection behaviors described above, but adjust them for the ED region, such that a velocity of 50% of the normal emergency velocity threshold may be enough to trigger an emergency response behavior of waiting by a wall for the fast-moving person or object to pass. Similarly, the robot 100 may increase its lockout zones 404 and/or comfort zones 406 for objects in an ED unit to decrease the likelihood that it will collide with a shelf or table containing delicate instruments.
The status determination component 306 may determine that the current status includes that the robot 100 is involved in an emergency or has an urgent status. For example, while being remotely operated by a doctor, the doctor may select an option for urgent operation of the robot 100. In one embodiment, in response to receiving an indication that the robot 100 is involved in an emergency situation, the robot 100 may be configured to violate one or more of the social protocols discussed herein. For example, the robot 100 may violate the group conversation rule to reach a high-priority destination by traveling between two humans having a conversation. In another embodiment, the robot 100 may need to reduce the size of a lockout zone by a predetermined fraction, such as one half. Similarly, increased speed or other changes in restrictions may be followed. In addition, the robot 100 may be configured to play a sound clip of a polite phrase, such as, “excuse me” or “I'm sorry.”
The status determination component 306 may determine the current status as being located within a specific region of a work area. In one embodiment, the robot 100 may have the ability to change its navigational settings depending on the different areas of the hospital through which it is traveling. In some embodiments, the map component 210 may allow the robot 100 to determine which region of the hospital it is in, and the robot 100 may adapt its operation accordingly. For example, the robot 100 may adjust behaviors, such as how far it navigates into a room, the speeds it travels, the radii of the lockout zone 404 and/or buffers between itself and objects, and other behaviors. In some embodiments, the robot 100 in an intensive care unit (ICU) region or a pediatric ward may adjust its maximum speed to 50% of its normal pace. In another embodiment, the robot 100 may navigate only a specified distance into an ICU room from the doorway. For example, the robot 100 may move only far enough into a room to view information from monitors. In this example, the rest of the room may be considered a lockout zone 404.
The social path component 302 may also allow the robot 100 to exhibit team based behavior. In one embodiment, for example, the display interface 108 on the upper portion 104 of the robot 100 may present a “follow team” option that may be selected by a user. When the follow team option is selected, the robot 100 may identify various features of a person to be followed, such as height, facial features, size, or other physical characteristics. The social path component 302 may then follow the identified individual at a pre-determined distance. The robot 100 may accomplish this using the object detection system 206 that performs methods such as facial detection and/or other detection and following techniques. When following an individual, the robot's 100 speed and lockout zones may be adjusted to comply with a team-based environment. In some embodiments, the robot's 100 lockout zone may be reduced to allow it closer physical proximity to the team or followed individual, and/or the comfort zone may be reduced or eliminated entirely. In other embodiments, the speed of the robot 100 may be adjusted to match a time-averaged speed of the team or individual.
The social path component 302 may also exhibit team behavior by getting out of the way of an oncoming person. For example, the social path component 302 may cause the robot 100 to move in a human-like way in response to objects or people moving in its direction, even if they have not crossed into its navigational path. In one embodiment, the robot 100 may respond to a human presence in a hallway by moving closer to one side of the hallway, decelerating as the person or object approaches, moving to the side of the hallway and stopping until the person or object has passed, and/or by performing other human-like reactions. In one embodiment, if the robot determines that a hallway is narrow, the robot 100 may decelerate as a person and/or object approach. The robot 100 may stop next to the wall as a person and/or object approach in a narrow hallway, and resume once they have passed. In one embodiment, the robot 100 may use any of the various detection methods described above, such as a motion detection method, to choose the side of the hallway opposite of the detected movement (or choose either side of the hallway if the motion is from the center of the hallway, or the side of the hallway that is less congested with other obstacles). In one embodiment, the robot 100 may be configured to always go toward either the right or the left, based on a user specification. In another embodiment, the robot 100 may detect if the hallway is narrow and decelerate accordingly.
The acknowledgment component 308 may be configured to provide acknowledgement or other visible information to nearby humans. For example, the acknowledgment component 308 may be configured to cause the robot 100 to socially acknowledge a human, indicate a direction to be traveled by the robot, indicate a state or status of the robot 100, apologize for violating a social rule, or the like. The acknowledgment component 308 may provide the acknowledgement or indications visually, audibly, or using a gesture.
The acknowledgment component 308 may provide acknowledgment or other indications using the lights 114. For example, the acknowledgment component 308 may us the lights 114 or other lights located on the base 102, upper portion 104, head, front, back, and/or other areas to indicate direction, intended direction, urgency, or usage, and/or to set a mood. In one embodiment, if a pathway is blocked by a human the acknowledgment component 308 may flash the lights 114 to get the attention of a person blocking the path. Various colors of lights 114 may be associated with moods and/or contexts. For example, blue may be calming or soothing, while red or yellow may indicate an emergency. The lights may also indicate if a robot 100 is being tele-operated or is autonomously navigating.
In one embodiment, the acknowledgment component 308 flashes the lights 114 to indicate that the robot 100 is in an emergency or urgent status. Similarly, flashing lights may indicate that the robot 100 is delayed. For example, in the scenarios discussed above, the acknowledgment component 308 may turn on the lights 114, flash the lights 114, or the like to indicate that the robot 100 may act in a more urgent manner and may pass closer and/or move more quickly than normal. For example, the robot 100 may use the lights 114 as a blinker to indicate that the robot 100 will turn to the right. Nearby people will notice the flashing lights 114 and pay attention or move out of the way of the robot 100.
The acknowledgment component 308 may provide acknowledgment or other indications by making an audible sound, such as by using a speaker. For example, the acknowledgment component 308 may also provide an audible warning, or apology, to nearby humans when it violates a comfort zone, reduced lockout zone, conversation zone, or the like. For example, the robot 100 may play an audio clip that says “I'm sorry,” “excuse me,” or the like. As another example, the robot 100 may play a subdued siren sound, beeping sound, or other warning sound when the robot 100 is in an urgent mode or when it has been delayed. This may provide a notification to nearby individuals that the robot 100 is there and may be trying to get by. In one embodiment, the acknowledgment component 308 causes the robot 100 to provide a social acknowledgment to a passing human. For example, the robot 100 may say “hello” or provide any other audible greeting to a passing human.
When the robot 100 needs to violate any rules, it may apologize to the humans by playing the sound clip as it passes. The robot 100 may also issue a warning before it violates a social rule. For example, a warning may be issued by playing a sound clip of a pre-recorded polite phrase. In other embodiments, this warning may be issued by flashing lights 114 on the upper portion 104 of the robot 100.
The acknowledgement component 308 may also cause a gesture component 310 to perform a gesture to indicate a status or acknowledge a passing human. For example, gestures may be performed to indicate a direction to be traveled, acknowledge the human, or the like.
The gesture component 310 may be configured to perform a gesture to indicate a direction to be traveled. For example, the gesture component 310 may cause the head 106 of the robot 100 to turn in the direction the robot 100 intends to travel. The head 106 may be turned prior to the robot 100 actually moving in that direction. This is similar to how humans often turn their head in the direction they intend to walk before moving in that direction. Humans can generally read this body language and know where a person intends to walk and can thus avoid walking in the same direction, slowing to let that person pass, or the like. Similarly, by turning its head 106 in the direction it intends to travel the robot 100 may naturally communicate a direction to be traveled to nearby humans where the robot 100 will go. This may reduce the likelihood of the robot 100 coming within a lockout zone 404 or comfort zone 406 of the person 402. This is partly because the movement is rendered more predictable to the human because of the gesture.
Similar gestures may also be performed at doorways or near other blind spots. The robot 100 may utilize a navigational algorithm that causes the robot 100 to face the direction of its motion. For instance, rather than facing forward and panning to the left or right, the robot 100 may turn its body portion and/or head portion in the direction of the movement. The robot 100 may also imitate human behavior by rotating its head portion to the left and right (scan) over a room or corridor before entering. If the head portion of the robot 100 faces a different direction than the actual movement, humans in the surrounding region may find it unnatural, disturbing, distracting, and/or otherwise be made to feel uncomfortable. Accordingly, the robot 100 may imitate human behavior by maintaining its head portion facing the direction of movement, other than for brief periods as described herein (e.g., when greeting).
In one embodiment, the robot 100 may decelerate its approach to a threshold, stop to scan the room or intersection, and then adjust its navigational path if necessary. In other embodiments, the robot 100 may not come to a complete stop, but may decelerate to a very slow speed such as between 0.1 mph and 2 mph as it scans the room or intersection.
The gesture component 310 may be configured to perform a gesture to acknowledge a passing person 402. The robot 100 may use a method, such as motion detection, facial recognition techniques, or other detection methods to detect humans. In one embodiment, the robot 100 may turn its head 106 to face the human briefly, and then return to face the direction of its travel. In other embodiments, the robot 100 may keep its face pointed toward the human's face for a moment, so as to simulate the equivalent of human eye contact. In other embodiments, the robot 100 may be configured to simulate a nod to the human, such as by tilting its head 106 downward, then returning its head 106 to face its forward direction. The robot 100 may also be configured to greet humans in the hallway by playing a pre-recorded sound clip of a greeting such as, “hello” or “good morning.”
Throughout this disclosure, the concept of a robot “turning its head” may include a robot turning a head portion relative to a body portion. Alternatively, “turning its head” may include a robot with a fixed head, and thus require that the robot rotate more than just a head portion (e.g., the upper portion 104, a base 102, or even the complete robot) in order to “turn its head” and “look” in a particular direction or at a particular object.
The personality component 312 may control the robot 100 to operate according to an assigned personality. For example, a personality may be assigned to the robot to cause it to behave in certain ways. For example, a shy robot may only nod, while an outgoing robot may greet each human verbally as it passes. Similarly, the types of acknowledgments may vary between different personality types. The personality component 312 may also cause the lights 114 to light up according to the personality type and may display a caricature corresponding to the personality type. For example, caricatures that may amuse children may be used in a children's section of a hospital.
Returning to
In one embodiment, the biohazard detection component 214 may detect a potential biohazard by detecting material on a floor of a work area that is not part of the floor based on an image captured by a camera of the robot 100. For example, the biohazard detection component 214 may perform image analysis to detect liquid, powders, or other materials on a floor of the work area. The biohazard detection component 214 may be capable of identifying a material based on color, location, size, shape, texture, etc. Similarly, a moisture sensor or chemical sensor may also be used to identify a type of biohazard or potential biohazard.
The biohazard safety component 216 is configured to provide instructions to the control system to cause the robot 100 to prevent spreading of a detected potential biohazard. The biohazard safety component 216 may prevent spreading of the potential biohazard by stopping on or near the potential biohazard to block others from walking through the potential biohazard and spreading it throughout a work area. The biohazard safety component 216 may provide a warning to nearby humans about the detected potential biohazard. In one embodiment, the biohazard safety component 216 may cause the robot 100 to flash a biohazard symbol on the display interface 108. In one embodiment, the biohazard safety component 216 may cause the robot 100 to flash one or more lights 114 to indicate an emergency or urgent situation. In one embodiment, an audible warning may be played by the robot 100 that indicates that there is a potential biohazard and instructing humans to avoid it. In one embodiment, a biohazard symbol, flashing lights, and an audible warning may all be provided.
The biohazard safety component 216 may prevent spreading of the potential biohazard by transmitting a message that there is a detected potential biohazard. For example, the biohazard safety component 216 may cause the communication system 208 to send a message over a wireless network to indicate the location, type of potential biohazard, and/or other information about the potential biohazard. A cleaning crew or other management crew may receive the message and be able to address the problem and/or clean up the biohazard.
The biohazard safety component 216 may prevent spreading of the potential biohazard by cleaning up the biohazard. The biohazard safety component 216 may be equipped with cleaning tools to clean up a liquid, powder, or any other material. The biohazard safety component 216 may include a sterilization pad and/or drying pad to sterilize and/or dry the area where the potential biohazard was detected. Thus, the robot 100 may be capable of maintaining sanitation in a work area, such as a hospital. The robot 100 may send a message that the potential biohazard was cleaned and one or more workers may be able to double check whether there is any more cleaning that needs to be done.
When the biohazard detection component 214 detects a biohazard, the robot 100 may stop immediately. After the robot 100 stops, it may turn on a signal to alert healthcare facility staff. In another embodiment, the display interface 108 may flash a “Biohazard Detected” message with a biohazard symbol 1004. This message may also be present with options that the healthcare facility staff could select such as, “Resume,” “Shut Down,” and “Wait.” In another embodiment, the robot 100 may send a short message service (SMS) message (or other electronic message) to hospital maintenance or to the manufacturer's tech support department to alert them of the biohazard 1002. In another embodiment, the healthcare facility and/or the robot 100 may be equipped with sterilization pads. The robot 100 may utilize a sterilization pad to perform an auto clean to destroy the biohazard 1002 and sterilize the area. In some embodiments, the sterilization pad may be placed adjacent to a re-lubrication pad, in case the sterilization effort removes the robot 100 wheel lubrication. In other embodiments, a drying pad may also be utilized.
Some of the components that can be used with embodiments disclosed herein are already available, such as general-purpose computers, mobile phones, computer programming tools and techniques, digital storage media, and communications networks. A computing device, such as a laptop, tablet computer, desktop computer, server, Smartphone, or the like, may include a processor, such as a microprocessor, microcontroller, logic circuitry, or the like. The processor may include a special purpose processing device such as an ASIC, PAL, PLA, PLD, FPGA, or other customized or programmable device. The computing device may also include a computer-readable storage device such as non-volatile memory, static RAM, dynamic RAM, ROM, CD-ROM, disk, tape, magnetic, optical, flash memory, or other computer-readable storage medium.
Various aspects of certain embodiments may be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. As used herein, a software component may include any type of computer instruction or computer executable code located within or on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium. A software component may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions, which may be organized as a routine, program, object, component, data structure, etc., which performs one or more tasks or implements particular abstract data types.
In certain embodiments, a particular software component may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations of a computer-readable storage medium, which together implement the described functionality of the component. Indeed, a component may comprise a single instruction or many instructions, and may be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several computer-readable storage media. Some embodiments may be practiced in a distributed computing environment where tasks are performed by a remote processing device linked through a communications network.
The systems and methods disclosed herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus and may be implemented by a suitable combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. Software implementations may include one or more computer programs comprising executable code/instructions that, when executed by a processor, may cause the processor to perform a method defined at least in part by the executable instructions. The computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and can be deployed in any form, including as a standalone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. Further, a computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
Software embodiments may be implemented as a computer program product that comprises a non-transitory storage medium configured to store computer programs and instructions that, when executed by a processor, are configured to cause the processor to perform a method according to the instructions. In certain embodiments, the non-transitory storage medium may take any form capable of storing processor-readable instructions on a non-transitory storage medium. A non-transitory storage medium may be embodied by a compact disk, digital-video disk, a magnetic tape, a Bernoulli drive, a magnetic disk, a punch card, flash memory, integrated circuits, or any other non-transitory digital processing apparatus memory device.
Although the foregoing has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be made without departing from the principles thereof. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing the processes, apparatuses, and system described herein. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” and any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, a method, a system, an article, or an apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, system, article, or apparatus.
It will be obvious to those having skill in the art that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the invention. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/720,214, filed Sep. 29, 2017, for “Social Behavior Rules for a Medical Telepresence Robot,” which is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/931,641, filed, Nov. 3, 2015, for “Social Behavior Rules for a Medical Telepresence Robot,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/550,743, filed Nov. 21, 2014, for “Social Behavioral Rules for a Medical Telepresence Robot,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,174,342, which is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/031778, for “Social Behavioral Rules for a Medical Telepresence Robot,” filed Mar. 14, 2013. The forgoing applications also claim priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/650,205 filed May 22, 2012, titled “Remote Presence Interface and Patient Data Integration”; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/674,794 filed Jul. 23, 2012, titled “Graphical User Interfaces Including Touchpad Driving Interfaces for Telemedicine Devices”; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/674,796 filed Jul. 23, 2012, titled “Clinical Workflows Utilizing Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Telemedicine Devices”; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/674,782 filed Jul. 23, 2012, titled “Behavioral Rules For a Telemedicine Robot To Comply With Social Protocols”; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/766,623 filed Feb. 19, 2013, titled “Graphical User Interfaces Including Touchpad Driving Interfaces for Telemedicine Devices.” All of the foregoing applications are all hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3821995 | Aghnides | Jul 1974 | A |
4107689 | Jellinek | Aug 1978 | A |
4213182 | Eichelberger et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4413693 | Derby | Nov 1983 | A |
4471354 | Smith | Sep 1984 | A |
4519466 | Shiraishi | May 1985 | A |
4553309 | Hess et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4572594 | Schwartz | Feb 1986 | A |
4625274 | Schroeder | Nov 1986 | A |
4638445 | Mattaboni | Jan 1987 | A |
4652204 | Arnett | Mar 1987 | A |
4669168 | Tamura et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4679152 | Perdue | Jul 1987 | A |
4697278 | Fleischer | Sep 1987 | A |
4697472 | Hiyane | Oct 1987 | A |
4709265 | Silverman et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4733737 | Falamak | Mar 1988 | A |
4751658 | Kadonoff et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4766581 | Korn et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4777416 | George et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4797557 | Ohman | Jan 1989 | A |
4803625 | Fu et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4847764 | Halvorson | Jul 1989 | A |
4875172 | Kanayama | Oct 1989 | A |
4878501 | Shue | Nov 1989 | A |
4942512 | Kohno | Jul 1990 | A |
4942538 | Yuan et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953159 | Hayden et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4974607 | Miwa | Dec 1990 | A |
4977971 | Crane et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5006988 | Borenstein et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5040116 | Evans et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5051906 | Evans et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5073749 | Kanayama | Dec 1991 | A |
5084828 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5130794 | Ritchey | Jul 1992 | A |
5148591 | Pryor | Sep 1992 | A |
5153833 | Gordon et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5155684 | Burke et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5157491 | Kassatly | Oct 1992 | A |
5182641 | Diner et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5186270 | West | Feb 1993 | A |
5193143 | Kaemmerer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5217453 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5220263 | Onishi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224157 | Yamada et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230023 | Nakano | Jul 1993 | A |
5231693 | Backes et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5236432 | Matsen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5262944 | Weisner et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5305427 | Nagata | Apr 1994 | A |
5315287 | Sol | May 1994 | A |
5319611 | Korba | Jun 1994 | A |
5341242 | Gilboa et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341459 | Backes | Aug 1994 | A |
5341854 | Zezulka et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347306 | Nitta | Sep 1994 | A |
5347457 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350033 | Kraft | Sep 1994 | A |
5366896 | Margrey et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374879 | Pin et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375195 | Johnson | Dec 1994 | A |
5400068 | Ishida et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5417210 | Funda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419008 | West | May 1995 | A |
5436542 | Petelin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441042 | Putman | Aug 1995 | A |
5441047 | David et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442728 | Kaufman et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5462051 | Oka et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5486853 | Baxter et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5510832 | Garcia | Apr 1996 | A |
5511147 | Abdel-Malek | Apr 1996 | A |
5528289 | Cortjens et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539741 | Barraclough et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544649 | David et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550577 | Verbiest et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553609 | Chen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563998 | Yaksich et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572229 | Fischer | Nov 1996 | A |
5572999 | Funda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594859 | Palmer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598208 | McClintock | Jan 1997 | A |
5600573 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617539 | Ludwig et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619341 | Auyeung et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623679 | Rivette et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630566 | Case | May 1997 | A |
5636218 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5652849 | Conway et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657246 | Hogan et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659779 | Laird et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5673082 | Wells et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675229 | Thorne | Oct 1997 | A |
5682199 | Lankford | Oct 1997 | A |
5684695 | Bauer | Nov 1997 | A |
5701904 | Simmons et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5734804 | Bergner | Mar 1998 | A |
5734805 | Isensee et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739657 | Takayama et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748629 | Caldara et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749058 | Hashimoto | May 1998 | A |
5749362 | Funda et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754631 | Cave | May 1998 | A |
5758079 | Ludwig et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762458 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764731 | Yablon | Jun 1998 | A |
5767897 | Howell | Jun 1998 | A |
5786846 | Hiroaki | Jul 1998 | A |
5787745 | Colens | Aug 1998 | A |
5793365 | Tang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801755 | Echerer | Sep 1998 | A |
5802494 | Kuno | Sep 1998 | A |
5836872 | Kenet et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838575 | Lion | Nov 1998 | A |
5844599 | Hildin | Dec 1998 | A |
5857534 | Devault et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867494 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867653 | Aras et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871451 | Unger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872922 | Hogan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5911036 | Wright et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917958 | Nunally et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927423 | Wada et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949758 | Kober | Sep 1999 | A |
5954692 | Smith et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959423 | Nakanishi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961446 | Beller et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966130 | Benman | Oct 1999 | A |
5973724 | Riddle | Oct 1999 | A |
5974446 | Sonnenreich et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983263 | Rothrock et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995119 | Cosatto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995884 | Allen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999977 | Riddle | Dec 1999 | A |
6006140 | Carter | Dec 1999 | A |
6006946 | Williams et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031845 | Walding | Feb 2000 | A |
6036812 | Williams et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047259 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6091219 | Maruo et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113343 | Goldenberg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133944 | Braun et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135228 | Asada et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148100 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160582 | Hill | Dec 2000 | A |
6170929 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175779 | Barrett | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189034 | Riddle | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201984 | Funda et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211903 | Bullister | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219587 | Ahlin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232735 | Baba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233504 | Das et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233735 | Ebihara | May 2001 | B1 |
6250928 | Poggio et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256556 | Zenke | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259806 | Green | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259956 | Myers et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266162 | Okamura et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266577 | Popp et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289263 | Mukherjee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292713 | Jouppi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292714 | Okabayashi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304050 | Skaar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314631 | Pryor | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317652 | Osada | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317953 | Pryor | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321137 | De Smet | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324184 | Hou et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324443 | Kurakake et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325756 | Webb et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327516 | Zenke | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330486 | Padula | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330493 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342915 | Ozaki et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346950 | Jouppi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346962 | Goodridge | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369847 | James et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373855 | Downing et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381515 | Inoue et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389329 | Colens | May 2002 | B1 |
6400378 | Snook | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408230 | Wada | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6411055 | Fujita et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6430471 | Kintou et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430475 | Okamoto et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6438457 | Kokoo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445964 | White et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449762 | Mcelvain | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452915 | Jorgensen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457043 | Kwak et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459955 | Bartsch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463352 | Tadokoro et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463361 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466844 | Ikeda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468265 | Evans et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470235 | Kasuga et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6474434 | Bech | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480762 | Uchikubo et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496099 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496755 | Wallach et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501740 | Sun et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507773 | Parker et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522906 | Salisbury et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523629 | Buttz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526332 | Sakamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529620 | Thompson | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6529765 | Franck et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529802 | Kawakita et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532404 | Colens | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535182 | Stanton | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535793 | Allard | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540039 | Yu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543899 | Covannon et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549215 | Jouppi | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563533 | Colby | May 2003 | B1 |
6567038 | Granot et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6580246 | Jacobs | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581798 | Liff et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584376 | Van Kommer | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587750 | Gerbi et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6590604 | Tucker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594269 | Polcyn | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594552 | Nowlin et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597392 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602469 | Maus et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6604019 | Ahlin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604021 | Imai et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604022 | Parker | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611120 | Song et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6643496 | Shimoyama et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646677 | Noro et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650748 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666374 | Green et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6667592 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674259 | Norman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684129 | Salisbury et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6691000 | Nagai et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693585 | Macleod | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6710797 | Mcnelley et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724823 | Rovati et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728599 | Wang et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6763282 | Glenn et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764373 | Osawa et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769771 | Trumbull | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781606 | Jouppi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784916 | Smith | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785589 | Eggenberger et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791550 | Goldhor et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798753 | Doganata et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799065 | Niemeyer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799088 | Wang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804580 | Stoddard et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804656 | Rosenfeld et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810411 | Coughlin et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816192 | Nishikawa | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816754 | Mukai et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6836703 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839612 | Sanchez et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840904 | Goldberg | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845297 | Allard | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852107 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853878 | Hirayama et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853880 | Sakagami et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856662 | Glass et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871117 | Wang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879879 | Jouppi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888333 | Laby | May 2005 | B2 |
6892112 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893267 | Yueh | May 2005 | B1 |
6895305 | Lathan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898484 | Lemelson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914622 | Smith et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925357 | Wang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6951535 | Ghodoussi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6952470 | Tioe et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957712 | Song et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958706 | Chaco et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965394 | Gutta et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990112 | Brent et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6995664 | Darling | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007235 | Hussein et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7011538 | Chang | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7015934 | Toyama et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7030757 | Matsuhira et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
RE39080 | Johnston | May 2006 | E |
7053578 | Diehl et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055210 | Keppler et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058689 | Parker et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092001 | Schulz | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096090 | Zweig | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7115102 | Abbruscato | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7117067 | Mclurkin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123285 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123292 | Seeger et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7123974 | Hamilton | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7123991 | Graf et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127325 | Nagata et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129970 | James et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133062 | Castles et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142945 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142947 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151982 | Liff et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154526 | Foote et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155306 | Haitin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156809 | Quy | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7158859 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7158860 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7158861 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161322 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162338 | Goncalves et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164969 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164970 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167448 | Wookey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171286 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174238 | Zweig | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7181455 | Wookey et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184559 | Jouppi | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188000 | Chiappetta et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199790 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202851 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206627 | Abovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215786 | Nakadai et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219364 | Bolle et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222000 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227334 | Yang et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7256708 | Rosenfeld et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262573 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7283153 | Provost et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289883 | Wang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292257 | Kang et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7292912 | Wang et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305114 | Wolff et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317685 | Flott et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7321807 | Laski | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332890 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333642 | Green | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346429 | Goldenberg et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7352153 | Yan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363121 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7382399 | McCall et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7386730 | Uchikubo | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391432 | Terada | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7400578 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404140 | O'Rourke | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7421470 | Ludwig et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430209 | Porter | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7432949 | Remy et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7433921 | Ludwig et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441953 | Banks | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7467211 | Herman et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7483867 | Ansari et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492731 | Hagendorf | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7510428 | Obata et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7523069 | Friedl et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7525281 | Koyanagi et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7535486 | Motomura et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7557758 | Rofougaran | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7584020 | Bruemmer | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7587260 | Bruemmer | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7587512 | Ta et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590060 | Miceli | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593030 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599290 | Dos Remedios et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620477 | Bruemmer | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624166 | Foote et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630314 | Dos Remedios et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7631833 | Ghaleb et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7643051 | Sandberg et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647320 | Mok et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657560 | Dirienzo | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7668621 | Bruemmer | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680038 | Gourlay | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7693757 | Zimmerman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698432 | Short et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703113 | Dawson | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7719229 | Kaneko et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7737993 | Kaasila et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739383 | Short et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7756614 | Jouppi | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761185 | Wang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769492 | Wang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769705 | Luechtefeld | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7774158 | Goncalves et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801644 | Bruemmer | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813836 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831575 | Trossell et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7835775 | Sawayama et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7860680 | Arms et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7861366 | Hahm et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873448 | Takeda | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885822 | Akers et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890382 | Robb et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7912583 | Gutmann et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
RE42288 | Degioanni | Apr 2011 | E |
7924323 | Walker et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7949616 | Levy et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7956894 | Akers et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7957837 | Ziegler et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7974738 | Bruemmer | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7982763 | King | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7982769 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987069 | Rodgers et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8073564 | Bruemmer | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077963 | Wang | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8116910 | Walters et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126960 | Obradovich et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8170241 | Roe et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8179418 | Wright et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180486 | Saito et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8209051 | Wang et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212533 | Ota | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234010 | Thompson | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8265793 | Cross et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271132 | Nielsen | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287522 | Moses et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292807 | Perkins et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301193 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8320534 | Kim et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8340654 | Bratton et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8340819 | Mangaser et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8348675 | Dohrmann | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355818 | Nielsen | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374171 | Cho et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8400491 | Panpaliya et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8401229 | Hassan-Shafique et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401275 | Wang et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8423284 | O'Shea | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8451731 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8463435 | Herzog et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489234 | Rew | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8503340 | Xu | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8515577 | Wang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527094 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8531502 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8532860 | Daly | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8610786 | Ortiz | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612051 | Normal et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620077 | Grundmann et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8632376 | Dooley | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639797 | Pan et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8670017 | Stuart et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8712162 | Kirsch | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718837 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
8726454 | Gilbert et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8836751 | Ballantyne et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849679 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849680 | Wright et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8861750 | Roe et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8897920 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8902278 | Pinter et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8935005 | Rosenstein | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8965578 | Versteeg | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8965579 | Wang et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8983772 | Lee | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9098611 | Pinter et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9147284 | Keene | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9219857 | Eldon | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224181 | Pinter et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9323250 | Wang | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9361021 | Jordan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9469030 | Wang | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9571789 | Pinter et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9776327 | Pinter | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9785149 | Wang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9902069 | Farlow | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10328576 | Pinter | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20010002448 | Wilson et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010010053 | Ben-Shachar et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010020200 | Das et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034475 | Flach et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034544 | Mo | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037163 | Allard | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048464 | Barnett | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010051881 | Filler | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054071 | Loeb | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055373 | Yamashita | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013641 | Nourbakhsh | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015296 | Howell et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020027597 | Sachau | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020027652 | Paromtchik et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020030397 | Tamura et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020033880 | Sul et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038168 | Kasuga et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044201 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049517 | Ruffner | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055917 | Muraca | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057279 | Jouppi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058929 | Green | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059587 | Cofano et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063726 | Jouppi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073429 | Beane et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082498 | Wendt et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085030 | Ghani | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020086262 | Rainey | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095238 | Ahlin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095239 | Wallach et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020098879 | Rheey | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104094 | Alexander et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020106998 | Presley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109770 | Terada | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109775 | White et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111988 | Sato | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120362 | Lathan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128985 | Greenwald | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130950 | James et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133062 | Arling et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141595 | Jouppi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143923 | Alexander | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177925 | Onishi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183894 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184674 | Xi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186243 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198626 | Imai | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030016726 | Pavlidis | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021107 | Howell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030397 | Simmons | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048481 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050733 | Wang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050734 | Lapham | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060808 | Wilk | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063600 | Noma et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069752 | Ledain et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080901 | Piotrowski | May 2003 | A1 |
20030100892 | Morley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030104806 | Ruef et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112823 | Collins et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114962 | Niemeyer | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120714 | Wolff et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126361 | Slater et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135097 | Wiederhold et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135203 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144579 | Buss | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144649 | Ghodoussi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151658 | Smith | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152145 | Kawakita | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171710 | Bassuk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174285 | Trumbull | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180697 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195662 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199000 | Valkirs et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206242 | Choi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212472 | McKee | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216833 | Mukai et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216834 | Allard | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220541 | Salisbury et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220715 | Kneifel et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231244 | Bonilla et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232649 | Gizis et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236590 | Park et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001197 | Ko et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040001676 | Colgan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009138 | Hockley, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010344 | Hiratsuka et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012362 | Tsurumi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013295 | Sabe et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017475 | Akers et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019406 | Wang et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024490 | McLurkin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041904 | Lapalme et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065073 | Nash | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068657 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078219 | Kaylor et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080610 | James et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088077 | Jouppi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088078 | Jouppi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093409 | Thompson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095516 | Rohlicek | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098167 | Yi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102167 | Shim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107254 | Ludwig et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040107255 | Ludwig et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117065 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117067 | Jouppi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123158 | Roskind | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135879 | Stacy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138547 | Wang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140404 | Ohta | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143421 | Wang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148638 | Weisman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150725 | Taguchi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153211 | Kamoto et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040157612 | Kim | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162637 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167666 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167668 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168148 | Goncalves et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040170300 | Jouppi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172301 | Mihai et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172306 | Wohl et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174129 | Wang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175684 | Kaasa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179714 | Jouppi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186623 | Dooley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189700 | Mandavilli et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201602 | Mody et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205664 | Prendergast | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215490 | Duchon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218099 | Washington | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040222638 | Bednyak | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224676 | Iseki | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230340 | Fukuchi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236830 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240981 | Dothan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040241981 | Doris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260790 | Balloni et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003330 | Asgarinejad et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004708 | Goldenberg et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007445 | Foote et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013149 | Trossell | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021182 | Wang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021183 | Wang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021187 | Wang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021309 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024485 | Castles et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027567 | Taha | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027794 | Decker | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050028221 | Liu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035862 | Wildman et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038416 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038564 | Burick | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049898 | Hirakawa | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052527 | Remy et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060211 | Xiao et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065435 | Rauch et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065438 | Miller | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065659 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065813 | Mishelevich et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071046 | Miyazaki et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073575 | Thacher et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078816 | Sekiguchi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083011 | Yang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099493 | Chew | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104964 | Bovynin | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110867 | Schulz | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122390 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125083 | Kiko | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125098 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149364 | Ombrellaro | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152447 | Jouppi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152565 | Jouppi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154265 | Miro et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168568 | Jouppi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182322 | Grispo | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192721 | Jouppi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204438 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212478 | Takenaka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219356 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225634 | Brunetti et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231156 | Yan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231586 | Rodman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232647 | Takenaka | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234592 | McGee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050264649 | Chang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267826 | Levy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278446 | Bryant | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283414 | Fernandes et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286759 | Zitnick et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007943 | Fellman | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010028 | Sorensen | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013263 | Fellman | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013469 | Wang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013488 | Inoue | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014388 | Lur et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020694 | Nag et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029065 | Fellman | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047365 | Ghodoussi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048286 | Donato | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052676 | Wang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052684 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056655 | Wen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056837 | Vapaakoski | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064212 | Thorne | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066609 | Iodice et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071797 | Rosenfeld et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074525 | Close et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074719 | Horner | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082642 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087746 | Lipow | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095158 | Lee et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095170 | Yang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098573 | Beer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103659 | Karandikar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060104279 | Fellman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106493 | Niemeyer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122482 | Mariotti et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125356 | Meek et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142983 | Sorensen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149418 | Anvari | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161136 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161303 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060164546 | Adachi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171515 | Hintermeister et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173708 | Vining et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173712 | Joubert | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178559 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178776 | Feingold et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178777 | Park et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184274 | Sakai et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189393 | Edery | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195569 | Barker | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224781 | Tsao et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247045 | Jeong et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259193 | Wang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268704 | Ansari et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271238 | Choi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271400 | Clements et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293788 | Pogodin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008321 | Gallagher et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016328 | Ziegler | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021871 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025711 | Marcus | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046237 | Lakshmanan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050937 | Song et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061041 | Zweig | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070064092 | Sandberg et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070070069 | Samarasekera et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078566 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093279 | Janik | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070109324 | Lin | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112700 | Den et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116152 | Thesling | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117516 | Saidi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120965 | Sandberg et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122783 | Habashi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133407 | Choi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135967 | Jung et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142964 | Abramson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156286 | Yamauchi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070170886 | Plishner | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176060 | White et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182811 | Rockefeller et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192910 | Vu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197896 | Moll et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198128 | Ziegler | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198130 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199108 | Angle et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070216347 | Kaneko et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226949 | Hahm et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234492 | Svendsen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250212 | Halloran et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255115 | Anglin, Jr. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255155 | Drew et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255706 | Iketani et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070262884 | Goncalves et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070273751 | Sachau | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070290040 | Wurman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291109 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291128 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009969 | Bruemmer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080011904 | Cepollina et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027591 | Lenser et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033641 | Medalia | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045804 | Williams | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051985 | D'Andrea et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056933 | Moore et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065268 | Wang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082211 | Wang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086236 | Saito | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086241 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091340 | Milstein et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080126132 | Warner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133052 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161969 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080174570 | Jobs et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201016 | Finlay | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201017 | Wang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215987 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229531 | Takida | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232763 | Brady | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242220 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255703 | Wang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263451 | Portele et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263628 | Normal et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267069 | Thielman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269949 | Normal et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281467 | Pinter | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285886 | Allen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306375 | Sayler et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316368 | Fritsch | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090021572 | Garudadri et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030552 | Nakadai | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044334 | Parsell et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049640 | Lee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055019 | Stiehl | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055023 | Walters et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070135 | Panda et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086013 | Thapa | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102919 | Zamierowski et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105882 | Wang et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106679 | Anzures et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122699 | Alperovitch et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125147 | Wang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125584 | Agrawala et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144425 | Marr et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146882 | Halivaara et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164255 | Menschik et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164657 | Li et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171170 | Li et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177323 | Ziegler et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177641 | Raghavan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201372 | O'Doherty et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210090 | Takemitsu | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090237317 | Rofougaran | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234499 | Nielsen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240371 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248200 | Root | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259339 | Wright et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323648 | Park et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010672 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010673 | Wang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017046 | Cheung et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019715 | Roe et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026239 | Li et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030378 | Choi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030578 | Siddique et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037418 | Hussey | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041998 | Postel et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100051596 | Diedrick et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063636 | Matsumoto | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063848 | Kremer et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066804 | Shoemake et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070079 | Mangaser et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073490 | Wang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076600 | Cross et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085874 | Noy et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088232 | Gale | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100115418 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116566 | Ohm et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128104 | Fabregat et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131103 | Herzog et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100145479 | Griffiths | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153317 | Lee | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157825 | Anderlind et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171826 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191375 | Wright et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100228249 | Mohr et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100243344 | Wyrobek | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253775 | Yamaguchi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268383 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278086 | Pochiraju et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286905 | Goncalves et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100301679 | Murray et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315352 | Hamamura | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323783 | Nonaka et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022705 | Yellamraju et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110050841 | Wang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071672 | Sanders | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071675 | Wells et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071702 | Wang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072114 | Hoffert et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110077852 | Ragavan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110153198 | Kokkas et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169832 | Brown et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172822 | Ziegler et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110187875 | Sanchez et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110190930 | Hanrahan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110193949 | Nambakam et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110195701 | Temby et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213210 | Temby et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218674 | Stuart et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231050 | Goulding | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231796 | Vigil | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245973 | Wang et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249079 | Santamaria et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110280551 | Sammon | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288417 | Pinter et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292193 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301759 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306400 | Nguyen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120023506 | Maeckel et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036484 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059946 | Wang | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072023 | Ota | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072024 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092157 | Tran | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095352 | Tran | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113856 | Krishnaswamy | May 2012 | A1 |
20120176525 | Garin | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120182392 | Kearns | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185095 | Rosenstein | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191246 | Roe et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191464 | Stuart et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203731 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215380 | Fouillade et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215830 | Anguiano | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218374 | Matula et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220372 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120291809 | Kuhe et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316676 | Fouillade et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002794 | Hines et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035790 | Olivier, III | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130065604 | Werner et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130113871 | Ballantyne et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130158720 | Zywicki et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166137 | Ahn | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130250938 | Anandakumar et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130275922 | Pinter et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130325244 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140015914 | Dalaunay | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140047022 | Chan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140085543 | Hartley et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140128103 | Joao et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135990 | Stuart et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139616 | Pinter et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140155755 | Pinter et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140207286 | Wang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140254896 | Zhou | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267549 | Pinter et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150077502 | Jordan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081338 | Lai et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088310 | Pinter et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150296177 | Pinter et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150314449 | Wang et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160229058 | Pinter et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160283685 | Pinter et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160358276 | Stephenson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170023944 | Wang et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170106738 | Gillett | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170127019 | Pinter et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170144299 | Lafaye | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1216200 | May 2000 | AU |
2289697 | Nov 1998 | CA |
1404695 | Mar 2003 | CN |
1554193 | Dec 2004 | CN |
1554985 | Dec 2004 | CN |
1561923 | Jan 2005 | CN |
1743144 | Mar 2006 | CN |
101049017 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101106939 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101151614 | Mar 2008 | CN |
100407729 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101390098 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101507260 | Aug 2009 | CN |
101730894 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101866396 | Oct 2010 | CN |
101978365 | Feb 2011 | CN |
102203759 | Sep 2011 | CN |
466492 | Jan 1992 | EP |
488673 | Jun 1992 | EP |
981905 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1262142 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1304872 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1536660 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1573406 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1594660 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1763243 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1791464 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1800476 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1819108 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1856644 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1928310 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1232610 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2027716 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2145274 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2214111 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2263158 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2300930 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2342651 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2431261 | Apr 2007 | GB |
7-194609 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7-213753 | Aug 1995 | JP |
7-248823 | Sep 1995 | JP |
7-257422 | Oct 1995 | JP |
8-084328 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8-166822 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8-320727 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9-267276 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10-79097 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-288689 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-220706 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-032319 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-049800 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-079587 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-196876 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001-125641 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-147718 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-179663 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-188124 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-198865 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-198868 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001-199356 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-000574 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-046088 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-101333 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-112970 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-235423 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-305743 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002-321180 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002-355779 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004-181229 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-424824 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-261941 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004-289379 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-028066 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-059170 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-111083 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006-35381 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-508806 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-109094 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-224294 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-246438 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007-007040 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-081646 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-232208 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-316966 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2009-125133 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010-064154 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010-532109 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010-246954 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2006-0037979 KR | May 2006 | KR |
2009-0012542 | Feb 2009 | KR |
2010-0019479 | Feb 2010 | KR |
2010-0139037 | Dec 2010 | KR |
9306690 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9742761 | Nov 1997 | WO |
199851078 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9967067 | Dec 1999 | WO |
2000025516 | May 2000 | WO |
2000033726 | Jun 2000 | WO |
200131861 | May 2001 | WO |
2003077745 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004008738 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004012018 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004075456 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2006012797 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006044847 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006078611 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007041295 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007041038 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008100272 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009117274 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009128997 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009145958 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010006205 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010006211 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010033666 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010047881 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010062798 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010065257 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010120407 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011028589 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011097130 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011097132 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011109336 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011149902 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2013097264 | Jul 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Google Translation of Innovations Report,” From research project to television star: Care-O-bot in ZDF series, available online at http://www.innovations-report.de/specials/printa.php?id=5157, Sep. 28, 2001, 2 pages. |
“Magne Charge,” Smart Power of Electric Vehicles, Aug. 26, 1997, 2 pages. |
“More Online Robots: Robots that Manipulate,” available on-line at http://ford.ieor.berkeley.edu/ir/robots_a2.html, Retrieived on Nov. 23, 2010, Aug. 2001, 2 pages. |
“MPEG File Format Summary,” available online at http://www.fileformat.info/format/mpeg/egff.htm, Feb. 1, 2001, 8 pages. |
“Nomad Scout Language Reference Manual,” Nomadic Technologies, Software Version 2.7, Part No. DOC00002, Jul. 12, 1999, 47 pages. |
“ROBART I, II, III,” Spawar, Systems Center Pacific, 1998,8 pages. |
ACM Digital Library Record, Autonomous Robots vol. II Issue 1, available online at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=59155&picked=prox&cfid=360891374&cftoken=35225929, Jul. 2001, 2 pages. |
Active Media, Inc., “Saphira Software Manual,” Saphira Version 5.3, 1997, 105 pages. |
Activmedia Robotics, “Pioneer 2/PeopleBot TM,” Operations Manual, Version 9, Oct. 2001, 78 pages. |
Adams, Chris, “Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB'02),” Mobile Robotics Research Group, The Seventh International Conference, retrieved on Jan. 22, 2014, available online at http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/groups/mrg/MG.html, Aug. 4-11, 2002, 1 page. |
Al-Kassab et al., “A Review of Telemedicine,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 5, Suppement 1, 1999, pp. 103-106. |
Ando et al., “A Multimedia Self-service Terminal with Conferencing Functions,” Robot and Human Communication, Tokyo, Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Workshop, Jul. 5-7, 1995, pp. 357-362. |
Android Amusement Corp., “What Marketing Secret Renting Robots from Android Amusement Corp!”, (Advertisement), 1982, 1 page. |
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. 1 of IV, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A1-A6357. |
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. II of IV, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A6849-A10634. |
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. III of IV, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A10654-A15517. |
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Joint Appendix, vol. IV of IV, Jun. 24, 2013, pp. A15677-A18127. |
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, May 9, 2014, pp. 1-48. |
Apple Inc., “I Phone,” iPhone Series, XP002696350, Sep. 21, 2012, pp. 1-29. |
Applebome, Peter, “Planning Domesticated Robots for Tomorrow's Household,” New York Times, available on-line at http://www.theoldrobots.com/images17/dc17.jpg, Mar. 4, 1982, pp. 21 and 23. |
Bar-Cohen et al., “Virtual Reality Robotic Telesurgery Simulations Using MEMICA Haptic System,” Proceedings of SPIE's 8th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Mar. 5-8, 2001, pp. 1-7. |
Barrett, Rick, “Video Conferencing Business Soars as Companies Cut Travel; Some Travel Cuts are Permanent,” available online at http://www.ivci.com/international_videoconferencing_news_videoconferencing_news_19.html, May 13, 2002, 2 pages. |
Bartholomew, “Pharmacy Apothecary,” available online at http://classes.bnf.fr/ema/grands/034.htm, retrieved on Jul. 26, 2012, 2 pages. |
Bauer et al., “Remote Telesurgical Mentoring: Feasibility and Efficacy,” IEEE, Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000, pp. 1-9. |
Bauer, Jeffrey C., “Service Robots in Health Care: The Evolution of Mechanical Solutions to Human Resource Problems,” Bon Secours Health System Inc., Technology Early Warning System (TEWS), Future of Service Robots in Health Care, Jun. 2003, pp. 1-10. |
Bischoff, Rainer, “Design Concept and Realization of the Humanoid Service Robot HERMES,” Field and Service Robotics, Springer, 1998, pp. 485-492. |
Blackwell, Gerry, “Video: A Wireless LAN Killer App?” available online at http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/columns/article.php/1010261/Video-A-Wireless-LAN-Killer, Apr. 16, 2004 4 pages. |
Blaer et al., “TopBot: Automated Network Topology Detection with a Mobile Robot”, IEEE, Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Robotics 7 Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, Sep. 14-19, 2003, pp. 1582-1587. |
Bradner, S., “The Internet Standards Process—Revision 3”, Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2026, BCP 9, Obsoletes: 1602, Category: Best Current Practice, Oct. 1996, pp. 1-36. |
Brenner, Pablo, “A Technical Tutorial on the IEEE 802.11 Protocol,” Breezecom Wireless Communications, 1997, pp. 1-24. |
Breslow et al., “Effect of a Multiple-Site Intensive Care Unit Telemedicine Program on Clinical and Economic Outcome an Alternative Paradigm for Intensivist Staffing,” Critical Care Med, vol. 32, No. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 31-38. |
Brooks, Rodney Allen, “Remote Presence,” Abstracts from Flesh & Machines, How Robots Will Change Us, Feb. 2002, pp. 131-147. |
Brooks, Rodney, “A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot,” IEEE, Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. 2, No. 1, Mar. 1986, pp. 14-23. |
Celi et al., “The eICU: It's Not Just Telemedicine,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 29, No. 8 (Supplement), Aug. 2001, pp. 183-189. |
Cheetham et al., “Interface Development for a Child's Video Conferencing Robot,” available online at www.ryerson.ca/pebbles/publications/paper-iea200hfes-last.pdf, 2000, 4 pages. |
Christensen et al., “BeeSoft User's Guide and Reference,” Robots for the Real Word™, Real World Interface, Inc., Sep. 26, 1997, 203 pages. |
Chu et al., “Detection of Target Mobile Signal Strength,” Technical Development, Motorola Inc., Jan. 1999, pp. 205-206. |
Civil Minutes-General: Case No. CV 11-9185PA (AJWx), InTouch Tech., v. VGO Commons, Inc., Sep. 10, 2012, 7 pages. |
Cleary et al., “State of the Art in Surgical Robotics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges,” Feb. 24, 2002, pp. 1-26. |
CMU Course 16X62, “Robot User's Manual,” (describing the Nomad Scout), Carnegie Mellon University, Feb. 1, 2001, 11 pages. |
CNN, “Floating ‘Droids’ to Roam Apace Corridors of the Future,” Available online at http://edition.cnn.com/2000/TECH/space/01/12/psa/, Jan. 12, 2000, 3 pages. |
CNN.com, “Paging Dr. Robot: Machine Helps Doctors with Patients,” Sep. 30, 2003, 3 pages. |
Crowley, Susan L., “Hello to Our Future,” AARP Bulletin, Jan. 2000, 12 pages. |
Dalton, Barnaby, “Techniques for Web Telerobotics,” PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia, 2001, 243 pages. |
Dario et al., “A Robot Workstation for Diagnosis and Physical Therapy,” IEEE Catalog No. 88TH0234-5, 1989, pp. 67-72. |
Davies, Brian, “Robotics in MinimaII Invasive Surgery,” IEE Colloquium on Through the Keyhold: Microengineering in Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1995, pp. 1-2. |
Davis, Erik, “Telefriend, Meet iRobot, The Smartest Webcam on Wheels,” Wired Magazine, Issue 8.09, Available online at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.09/irobot.html?pg=1&topic=&topic_set+, Sep. 200, 3 pages. |
Dean et al., “1992 AAAI Robot Exhibition and Competition,” Articles, AI Magazine, vol. 14, No. 1, 1993, 15 pages. |
Defendant VGO Communications, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to the Feb. 27, 2012 Civil Minutes Order, May 2, 2012, 143 pages. |
Defendant-Counterclaimant VGO Communications, Inc,'s Supplemental Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to the Feb. 27, 2012 Civil Minute Order, May 14, 2012, 228 pages. |
Digiorgio, James, “Is Your Emergency Department of the Leading Edge,” Chicago Hospital News, vol. 2, No. 12, 2005, 3 pages. |
Dudenhoeffer et al., “Command and Control Architectures for Autonomous Micro-Robotic Forces,” FY00 Project Report, Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Human Systems Engineering and Sciences Department, Idaho Falls, Apr. 2001, 32 pages. |
Elhajj et al., “Real-Time Haptic Feedback in Internet-Based Telerobotic Operation,” IEEE International Conference on Electro/information Technology, available onine at http://www.egr.msu.edu˜ralab-web/cgi_bin/internet-teleoperation.php, Jun. 2000, 10 pages. |
Elhajj et al., “Supermedia in Internet-Based Telerobotic Operaitons,” Management of Multimedia on the Internet Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, vol. 2216, Oct. 29-Nov. 1, 2001, pp. 359-372. |
Elhajj et al., “Synchronization and Control of Supermedia Transmission Via the Internet,” Proceedings of 2001 International Symposium on Intelligent Multimedia and Speech Processing, May 2-4, 2001, pp. 320-323. |
Ellison et al., “Telerounding and Patient Satisfaction Following Surgery,” vol. 199, No. 4, Oct. 2004, pp. 523-530. |
Evans et al., “The Trackless Robotic Courier,” PYXIS HelpMate®, 2007, 3 pages. |
Fels et al., “Developing a Video-Mediated Communication System for Hospitalized Children,” Telemedicine Journal, vol. 5, No. 2, 1999, 30 pages. |
Fetterman et al., “Videoconferencing Over the Internet,” 2001, 8 pages. |
Fiorini et al., “Health Care Robotics: A Progress Report,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 20-25, 1997, pp. 1271-1276. |
Fong, Terreance, “Collaborative Control: A Robot-Centric Model for Vehicle Teleoperation,” Doctoral Dissertation Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-01-34, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Nov. 2001,197 pages. |
Fulbright et al., “SWAMI: An Autonomous Mobile Robot for Inspection of Nuclear Waste of Storage Facilities,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 2, 1995, pp. 225-235. |
Gaidioz et al. “Synchronizing Network Probes to Avoid Measurement Intrusiveness with the Network Weather Service,” Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on High-Performance Distributed Computing, 2000, pp. 137-154. |
Garner et al., “The Application of Telepresence in Medicine,” BT Technology Journal, vol. 15, No. 4, Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 181-187. |
Ghiasi et al., “A Generic Web-based Teleoperations Architecture: Details and Experience,” Proceedings of SPIE, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies VI, vol. 3840, No. 234, Sep. 19, 1999, 14 pages. |
Goldberg et al., “Collaborative Teleoperation via the Internet,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 2, 2000, pp. 2019-2024. |
Goldberg et al., “Desktop Teleoperation via the Word Wide Web,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, May 21-27, 1995, pp. 654-659. |
Goldenberg et al., “Telemedicine in Otolaryngology,” American Journal of Otolaryngology, vol. 23, No. 1, 2002, pp. 35-43. |
Goldman, Lea, “Machine Dreams,” available online at http://www.forbes.com/global/2002/0527/043.html, May 27, 2002, 5 pages. |
Gostai, “Gostai Jazz, Robotic Telepresence,” available online at http://www.robotshop.com/media/files/gostai-lass-information-sheet.pdf, 4 pages. |
Gump, Michael D., Robot Technology Improves VA Pharmacies, U.S. Medicine Informational Central, Jul. 2001, 3 pages. |
Han et al., “Construction of an Omnidirectional Mobile Robot Platform Based on Active Dual-Wheel Caster Mechanisms and Development of a Control Simulator,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 29, Issue 3, Nov. 2000, pp. 257-275. |
Handley et al., “RFC 2327—SDP: Session Description Protocol,” available online at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfs2327.html, Apr. 1998, 22 pages. |
Hanebeck et al., “ROMAN: A mobile Robotic Assistant for Indoor Service Applications,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2, Sep. 7-11, 1997, pp. 518-525. |
Harmo et al., “Moving Eye-Interactive Telepresence Over Internet with a Ball Shaped Mobile Robot,” available online at http://automation.tkk.fi/files/tervetaas/Moving_Eye4.pdf, 2000, 6 pages. |
Haule et al., Control Scheme for Delayed Teleoperation Tasks, IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers, and Signal Processing, May 17-19, 1995, pp. 157-160. |
Hees, William P., “Communications Design for a Remote Presence Robot,” CSCI E-131b, Final Project, Jan. 14, 2002, 12 pages. |
Herias et al., “Flexible Virtual and Remote Laboratory for Teaching Robotics,” Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, Jun. 2006, pp. 1959-1963. |
Holmberg et al., Development of a Holonomic Mobile Robot for Mobile Manipulation Tasks, International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 19, No. 11, Nov. 2000, pp. 1066-1074. |
Ishiguro et al., “Integrating a Perceptual Information Infrastructure with Robotic Avatars: A Framework for Tele-Existence,” IEEE-RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2, 1999, pp. 1032-1038. |
Ishihara et al., “Intelligent Microrobot DDS (Drug Delivery System) Measured and Controlled by Ultrasonics,” Intelligent Robots and Systems '91, Intelligence for Mechanical Systems, IEEE/RSJ International Workship, vol. 2, Nov. 3-5, 1991, pp. 1145-1150. |
ITU, “Call Completion Supplementary Services for H.323,” ITU-T, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, H.450.9, Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems, Nov. 2000, 63 pages. |
ITU, “Call Intrusion Supplementary Services for H.323,” ITU-T, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, H.450.11, Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems, Mar. 2001, 59 pages. |
ITU, “Packet-Based Multimedia Communications System,” ITU-T, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, H.323, Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems, Feb. 1998, 128 pages. |
ITU, “Transmission of Non-Telephone Signals: A Far End Camera Control Protocol for Videoconferences Using H.224,” ITU-T, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, H.281, Nov. 1994, 12 pages. |
Ivanov, Natali, “Master's Thesis: Internet Based Interface for Control of a Mobile Robot,” Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, 2003, 59 pages. |
Jacobs et al., “Applying Telemedicine to Outpatient Physical Therapy,” AMIA, Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2002, 1 page. |
Jenkins et al., “Telehealth Advancing Nursing Practice,” Nursing Outlook, vol. 49, No. 2, Mar. 2001, pp. 100-105. |
Johanson, Mathias, “Supporting Video-Mediated Communication Over the Internet,” Department of Computer Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2003, 222 pages. |
Jouppi et al., “BiReality: Mutually-Immersive Telepresence,” Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Oct. 10-16, 2004, pp. 860-867. |
Jouppi et al., “First Steps Towards Mutually-Immersive Mobile Telepresence,” Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Nov. 16-20, 2002, pp. 354-363. |
Kanehiro et al., “Virtual Humanoid Robot Platform to Develop Controllers of Real Humanoid Robots without Porting,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2, 2001, pp. 1093-1099. |
Kaplan et al., “An Internet Accessible Telepresence,” Multimedia Systems Journal, vol. 5, 1996, 7 pages. |
Keller et al., “Raven Interface Project,” The National Aviary's Teleconferencing Carnegie Mellon University Robot, Interaction and Visual Interface Design, School of Design, Carnegie Mellon University, 2001, 8 pages. |
Khatib et al.,“Robots in Human Environments,” Proceedings International Conference on Controll, Automation, Robotics, and Vision ICRACV2000, 1999, 15 pages. |
Knight et al., “Active Visual Alignment of a Mobile Stereo Camera Platform,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, Apr. 24-28, 2000, pp. 3203-3208. |
Koenen, Rob, “MPEG-4: a Powerful Standard for Use in Web and Television Environments,” (KPN Research), available online at http://www.w3.org/Architecture/1998/06/Workshop/paper26, Jul. 1, 2998, 4 pages. |
Kurlowicz et al., Can the GestureCAM Be a Surrogate? Proceedings of the fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1995, pp. 181-196. |
Kuzuoka et al., “Can the GestureCam Be a Surrogate?” Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1995, pp. 181-196. |
Lane, Earl, “Automated Aides,” Available online at http://222.cs.com.edu/nursebot/web/press/nd4380.htm, Oct. 17, 2000, 4 pages. |
Lee et al., “A Novel Method of Surgical Instruction: International Telementoring,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 16, No. 6, Dec. 1998, pp. 367-370. |
Leifer et al., “VIPRR: A Virtually in Person Rehabilitation Robot,” Proceedings of 1997 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Apr. 14-15, 1997, 4 pages. |
Lemaire, Edward, “Using Communication Technology to Enhance Rehabilitation Services: A Solution Oriented User Manual,” Institute of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Terry Fox Mobile Clinic, The Rehabilitation Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Version 2.0, available online at http://www.irrd.ca/telehealth/distfile/distman_v2_1.pdf, 1998-2001, 104 pages. |
Library of Congress, “008-Fixed-Length Data Elements (NR),” MARC 21 Format for Classification Data, available online at http://loc.gov/marc/classification/cd008.html, Jan. 2000, pp. 1-14. |
Lim et al., “Control to Realize Human-Like Walking of a Biped Humanoid Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000, vol. 5, 2000, pp. 3271-3276. |
Linebarger et al., “Concurrency Control Mechanisms for Closely Coupled Collaboration in Multithreaded Virtual Environments,” Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, vol. 13, 2004, 40 pages. |
Long, William F., “Robot Navigation Technology,” available http://www.atp.nist.gov/eao/sp950-1/helpmate.htm, Mar. 1999, 3 pages. |
Luna, Nancy, “Robot a New Face on Geriatric Care,” OCREGISTER.com, Aug. 6, 2003, 3 pages. |
Mack, Michael J., “Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, No. 5, 2001, pp. 568-572. |
Mair, G.M., “Telepresence—The Technology and its Economic and Social Implications,” Technology and Soceity, 1997, Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change, Proceedings, 1997, International Symposium, Jun. 20-21, 1997, pp. 118-124. |
Martin, Anya, “Brighter Days Ahead,” Assisted Living Today, vol. 9, Nov./Dec. 2002, pp. 19-22. |
McCardle et al., “The Challenge of Utilizing New Technology in Design Education,” Loughborough University, IDATER 2000, 2000, pp. 122-127. |
Meng et al., “E-Service Robot in Home Healthcare,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE-RSJ, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2000, pp. 832-837. |
Metz, Cade, “HP Labs,” available online at http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817.1130820.00.asp, Jul. 1,. |
Michaud, Anne, “Introducing Nursebot,” available online at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/nursebot/web/press/globe_301/index.html, 2001, 4 pages. |
Microsoft Corporation, Inc. “Microsoft NetMeeting 3 Features excerpt from Official Microsoft NetMeeting 3.0 Book,” available online at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc723477.aspx, 2012, 6 pages. |
Minsky, Marvin, “Telepresence,” OMNI Magazine, Jun. 1980, 6 pages. |
Montemerlo, Reddy Whittaker, “Telepresence: Experiments in Next Generation Internet,” available online at http://www.ri.cmu.edu/creative/archives.htm, Oct. 20, 1998, 3 pages. |
Murphy, Robin R., “Introduction to A1 Robotics,” A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, London, England, 2000, 487 pages. |
Nakajima et al., “A Multimedia Teleteaching System Using an Electronic Whiteboard for Two Way Communication of Motion Videos and Chalkboards,” 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, 1993, pp. 436-441. |
Nakazato et al., “Group-Based Interface for Content-Based Image Retrieval,” Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 2002, pp. 187-194. |
Nakazato et al., “ImageGrouper: A Group-Oriented User Interface for Content-Based Image Retrieval and Digital Image Arrangement,” Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, vol. 14, No. 4, Aug. 2003, pp. 45-46. |
Nersc, “Berkeley Lab's RAGE Telepresence Robot Captures R&D100 Award,” Available online at http://www.nersc.gov/news-publications/news/nerc-center-news/2002/berkerel-lab-s-rage-telepresence-robot-captures-r-and-d100-award/, Jul. 2, 2002, 2 pages. |
Nomadic Technologies Inc., “Nomad XR4000 Hardware Manual,” Release 1.0, Mar. 1999, 34 pages. |
Noritsugu et al., “Application of Rubber Artificial Muscle Manipulator as a Rehabilitation Robot,” Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions, vol. 2, No. 4, Dec. 1997, pp. 259-267. |
North, Michael, “Telemedicine: Sample Script and Specifications for a Demonstration of Simple Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Using Live Two-Way Video on a Computer Network,” Greenstar Corporation, 1998, 5 pages. |
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680044698.0 dated Nov. 4, 2010, 26 pages. |
Ogata et al., “Development of Emotional Communication Robot: WAMOEBA-2R-Experimental Evaluation,” Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 175-180. |
Ogata et al., “Emotional Communication Robot: WAMOEBA-2R—Emotion Model and Evaluation Experiments,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2000, pp. 1-16. |
Oh et al., “Autonomous Battery Recharging for Indoor Mobile Robots,” Proceedings of Australian Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2000, pp. 1-6. |
Ojha, Anand K., “An Application of Virtual Reality in Rehabilitation,” Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE Southeastcon 94. Creative Technology Transfer —Global Affair, Apr. 1994, pp. 4-6. |
Opening Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant InTouch Technologies, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Apr. 12, 2013, 187 pages. |
Osborn, Jim, “Quality of Life Technology Center,” QoLT Research Overview: A National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University of Pittsburgh, 2 pages. |
Panusopone et al., “Performance Comparison of MPEG-4 and H.263+ for Streaming Video Applications,” Circuits Systems Signal Processing, vol. 20, No. 3, 2001, pp. 293-309. |
Paulos et al., “A World Wide Web Telerobotic Remote Environment Browser,” Available online at http://www.w3.org/Conferences/WWW4/Papers/326/, 1995, 15 pages. |
Paulos et al., “Designing Personal Tele-Embodiment,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, May 16-20, 1998, pp. 3173-3178. |
Paulos et al., “Personal Tele-Embodiment,” Chapter 9 in Goldberg, et al., ed. “Beyond Webcams,” MIT Press, Jan. 4, 2002, pp. 155-167. |
Paulos et al., “PRoP: Personal Roving Presence,” ACM:CHI Proceedings of CHI '98, 1998, 8 pages. |
Paulos et al., “Social Tele-Embodiment: Understanding Presence,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 11, Issue 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Jul. 2001, pp. 87-95. |
Paulos et al., “Ubiquitous Tele-Embodiment: Applications and Implications,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 46, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 861-877. |
Paulos, Eric J., “Personal Tele-Embodiment,” Dissertation, Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California at Berkeley, 2001, 282 pages. |
Paulos, Eric John Canny, “Video of PRoP 2 at Richmond Field Station,” ww.prop.org Printout of Home Page of Website and two-page transcript of the audio portion of said PRoP Video, May 2001, 2 pages. |
Paulos, Eric John, “Personal Tele-Embodiment,” Introductory and cover pages from 2201 Dissertation including Contents table, together with emails relating thereto from Uc Berkeley Libraries, as shelved at UC Berkeley Engineering Library (Northern Regional Library Facility), May 8, 2002, 25 pages (including 4 pages of emails). |
Paulos, Eric John, “Personal Tele-Embodiment,” OskiCat Catalog Record, UCB Library Catalog, 2001, 3 pages. |
PictureTel Adds New Features and Functionality to Its Award-Winning Live200 Desktop Videoconferencing System, PR Newswire Association, LLC, Gale, Cengage Learning, Jun. 13, 1997, 5 pages. |
Picturetel Corporation, “PictureTel Live200 for Windows NT Product Guide,” 1997, 63 pages. |
Pin et al., “A New Family of Omnidirectional and Holonomic Wheeled Platforms for Mobile Robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 10, No. 4, Aug. 1994, pp. 480-489. |
Piquepaille, Roland, “This Blog and its RSS Feed are Moving,” Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends, How new technologies are modifying our way of life, Oct. 31, 2004, 2 pages. |
Radvision, “Making Sense of Bandwidth the Netsense Way,” Network Congestion in Unmanaged networks Bandwidth Estimation and Adaptation Techniques, White Paper, Radvision's Netsense Technology, 2010, 7 pages. |
Reply Brief for Defendant-Appellee VGO Communications, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in Case No. 2:11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, May 28, 2013, 75 pages. |
Reply Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant InTouch Technologies, Inc., Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, in Case No. 11-cv-9185, Judge Percy Anderson, Jun. 14, 2013, 39 pages. |
Reynolds et al., “Review of Robotic Telemedicine Utilization in Intensive Care Units (ICUs),” 11th Annual ATA Symposium, Tampa, Florida, 2011, 1 page. |
Roach, Adam, “Automatic Call back Service in SIP,” Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet Draft, Category: Informational, Mar. 2000, 8 pages. |
Rovetta et al., “A New Telerobotic Application: Remote Laparaoscopic Surgery Using Satellites and Optical Fiber Networks for Data Exchange,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 15, No. 3, Jun. 1, 1996, pp. 267-279. |
Roy et al., “Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly,” Workshop on Interactive Robots and Entertainment (WIRE 2000), available online at <http:www.ri.cmu.edu/pb_files/pub2/roy_nicholas_2000_1.pdf>, vol. 25, Apr. 30-May 1, 2000, 7 pages. |
Sachs et al., “Virtual Visit: Improving Communication for Those Who Need it Must,” Studies in Health Technology asn Informatics, vol. 94, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 11, 2003, pp. 302-308. |
Salemi et al., “MILO: Personal Robot Platform,” IEEE-RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Aug. 2005, pp. 4089-4094. |
Sandt et al., “Perceptions for a Transport Robot in Public Environments,” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 1, Sep. 7-11, 1997, pp. 360-365. |
Sawyer, Robert J., “Inventing the Future: 2000 years of Discovery,” available online at http://www.sfwriter.com/pritf.htm, Jan. 2, 2000, 2 pages. |
Schaeffer et al., “Care-O-BotTM: The Concept of a System for Assisting Elderly or Disabled Persons in Home Enviornments,” Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 4, 1998, pp. 2476-2481. |
Schraft et al., “Care-O-bot™: The Concept of a System for Assisting Elderly or Disabled Persons in Home Environments,” IEEE Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society, IECON '98, Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2476-2481. |
Schultz et al., “Web Interfaces for Mobile Robots in Public Places,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 7, No. 1, Mar. 2000, pp. 48-56. |
Screenshot Showing Google Date for Lemaire Telehealh Manual, screenshot retrieved on Dec. 18, 2014, 1 page. |
Shimoga et al., “Touch and Force Reflection for Telepresence Surgery,” Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 1994, pp. 1049-1050. |
Siegwart et al., “Interacting Mobile Robots on the Web,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1999, pp. 1-7. |
Simmons et al., “Xavier: An Autonomous Mobile Robot on the Web,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 1999, pp. 43-48. |
Stephenson, Gary, “Dr. Robot Tested at Hopkins,” available online at http://hopkinsmedicine.org/press/2003/august/030805.htm, Aug. 5, 2003, 2 pages. |
Stoianovici et al., “Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery,” Complications of Urologic Laparoscopic Surgery: Recognition, Management and Prevention, Dec. 2002, 17 pages. |
Suplee, Curt, “Mastering the Robot,” The Washington Post, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sep. 17, 2000, 5 pages. |
Tahboub et al., “Dynamics Analysis and Control of a Holonomic Vehicle with Continuously Variable Transmission,” Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 124, Mar. 2002, pp. 118-126. |
Telepresence Research, Inc., “The Telepresence Mobile Robot System,” available online at http://telepresence.com/telepresence-research/TELEROBOT/, Feb. 20, 1995, 3 pages. |
Tendick et al., “Human-Machine Interfaces for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Socieity, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 1997, pp. 2771-2776. |
Theodosiou et al., MuLVAT: A Video Annotation Tool Based on XML-Dictionaries and Shot Clustering, 19th International Conference, Artificial Neural Networks—ICANN 2009, Part II, Sep. 14-17, 2009, pp. 913-922. |
Thrun et al., “Probabilistic Algorithms and the Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot Minerva,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 19, 20000, pp. 1-35. |
Time, Lists, “Office Coworker Robot,” Bestr Inventions of 2001, available online at http://content.time/com/time/specials/packages/article/0.28804.1936165_1936255_1936640,00.html, Nov. 19, 2001, 2 pages. |
Tipsuwan et al., “Gain Adaptation of Networked Mobile Robot to Compensate QoS Deterioration,” 28th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 4, Nov. 5-8, 2002, pp. 3146-3151. |
Tsui et al., “Exploring Use Cases for Telepresence Robots,” 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Mar. 2011, pp. 11-18. |
Tyrrell et al., “Teleconsultation in Psychology: The Use of Videolinks for Interviewing and Assessing Elderly Patients,” Age and Ageing, vol. 30, No. 3, May 2001, pp. 191-195. |
Tzafestas et al., “VR-Based Teleoperation of a Mobile Robotic Assistant: Progress Report,” Technical Report DEMO 2000/13, Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos,” Nov. 2000, pp. 1-23. |
Umass Lowell Robotics Lab, “Robotics Lab @ UMASS Lowell,” Borchure, 2011, 2 pages. |
Urquhart, Kim, “InTouch's Robotic Companion ‘Beams Up’ Healthcare experts,” Medical Device Daily, vol. 7, No. 39, Feb. 27, 2003, pp. 1, 4. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/783,760, filed Feb. 20, 2004, 48 pages. |
U.S Appl. No. 60/449,762, filed Feb. 24, 2003, 28 pages. |
Using Your Infrared Cell Phone Camera, available online at http://www.calsdomain.com/xray/about.htm, Courtesy of Internet Wayback Machine, Jan. 30, 2010, 4 pages. |
Video Middleware Cookbook, “H.350 Directory Services for Multimedia,” 2 pages. |
Weaver et al., “Monitoring and Controlling Using the Internet and Java,” Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 1152-1158. |
Weiss et al., “PEBBLES: A Personal Technology for Meeting Education, Social and Emotional Needs of Hospitalised Children,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 5, No. 3, Aug. 2001, pp. 157-168. |
Weiss et al., “Telework and Video-Mediated Communication: Importance of Real-Time, Interactive Communication for Workers with Disabilities,” available online at http://www.telbotics.com/research_3.htm retrieved on Nov. 23, 2010, 3 pp. |
West et al., “Design of Ball Wheel Mechanisms for Omnidirectional Vehicles with Full Mobility and Invariant Kinematics,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 119, Jun. 1997, pp. 153-161. |
Yamasaki et al., “Applying Personal Robots and Active Interface to Video Conference Systems,” 6th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, vol. B, 1995, pp. 243-248. |
Yamauchi, Brian, “PackBot: A Versatile Platform for Military Robotics,” Proceedings of SPIE for Military Robotics, 2004, pp. 228-237. |
Yong et al., “Robot Task Execution with Telepresence Using Virtual Reality Technology,” 1998 International Conference on Mechatronic Technology, Nov. 30-Dec. 2, 1998, pp. 1-8. |
Zambroski, James, “CMU, Pitt Developing Nursebot,” available online at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜nursebot/web/press/tribunereview.html, Oct. 27, 2000, 3 pages. |
Zamrazil, Kristie, “Telemedicine in Texas: Public Policy Concerns,” Focus Report, House Research Organization, Texas House of Representatives, No. 76-22, May 5, 2000, pp. 1-16. |
Zipperer, Lorri, “Robotic Dispensing System,” ISMP Medical Safety Alert!, vol. 4, No. 17, Aug. 25, 1999, 2 pages. |
Zorn, Benjamin G., “Ubiquitous Telepresence,” Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, 1996, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200009736 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61650205 | May 2012 | US | |
61674794 | Jul 2012 | US | |
61674796 | Jul 2012 | US | |
61674782 | Jul 2012 | US | |
61766623 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15720214 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | 16418605 | US | |
Parent | 14931641 | Nov 2015 | US |
Child | 15720214 | US | |
Parent | 14550743 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 14931641 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2013/031778 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14550743 | US |