1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to methods and systems for ionization of a sample. More specifically, this invention comprises methods and systems for generating reagent ions to interact with a sample to produce ions from the sample.
2. Description of the Related Art
There is a present and growing need to detect a wide variety of chemicals as solids, liquids and vapor, resident in air or solutions, or on surfaces. The potential analytes from these chemicals can include, for example, chemical warfare agents, pesticides, pollutants, drugs, explosives, and other chemicals under process control. Depending upon the chemicals, their physical properties, and the means of their dispersal, these chemicals can be present in air as vapor, aerosol or particulate matter; in water or solvents as solutions or emulsions; or on surfaces such as concrete, asphalt, paper or textiles. A common feature underlying most of these organic chemicals is that they can be ionized. Once a chemical is ionized, it can be detected by many different sensors.
Conventional sensors can exploit molecular charge, size, shape, or other specific characteristics to distinguish one ionized chemical from others and provide identification. A device, particularly if it were handheld, that could ionize chemicals as vapors, liquids or solids whether they be in air or other gases, in solutions, or on surfaces would, therefore, be desirable to extend the capabilities of many ion-dependent sensors. It would also be desirable if, as a consequence of ionization, the device did not fragment the chemical into an abundance of different ions, which can make detection and identification more difficult.
A very wide range of chemicals can be ionized using a two step process. First, reactant ions such as O2− or H+(H2O)n are created. Upon contacting these ions, many chemicals are subsequently ionized, and these ions can then be detected. However, although conventional devices and methods attempt to accomplish positive ion chemical ionization at atmospheric pressure, there is a need for simple and reproducible means to perform atmospheric pressure chemical ionization using negative ions. Radioactive elements, such as 63Ni, can be used to ionize chemicals, particularly in handheld detectors. However, the owner or users of the device are burdened with logistical matters, such as licensing, reporting, and disposal requirements, involving the use of radioactive material. Non-radioactive ionization sources, such as gas discharge devices, eliminate such logistical concerns, but pose a different set of challenges. For example, power consumption and size may not be consistent with intended usage. It can be very difficult to control the discharge so that over long periods of usage only the desired ions are produced and the undesirable ions are not produced. Degradation of performance must be avoided from parts that wear out as a consequence of the discharge. Furthermore, there are many types of gas discharge devices, each having its own power and configuration requirements that can limit utility in a desired application. Finally, the need for helium or other bottled gas may render a particular device impractical for handheld, portable applications.
A pin-to-plane discharge device in a chamber having air flowing through may produce mostly ions of little utility, such as NO2−, NO3−, and only some O2−. A soft chemical ionization source (SCIS) can significantly improve the amounts of reactant or reagent ions produced. Various embodiments of the SCIS do not incorporate chambers, but all include at least one needle made from tungsten or stainless steel rod. The operating conditions for the SCIS embodiments include maintaining a constant glow discharge at high voltage, low current. The SCIS produces a discharge having types of ions that can be optimized for ionization of samples. By adjusting the physical structures and applied voltages, the ion outputs of several of the devices in positive mode can be greater than 95% (H+)(H2O)n=1-4. These ions are useful for the production of positive ions from samples. Furthermore, in negative ion mode, O2− reactant ions can be formed and ions with little or no use in ionizing samples (e.g., NO2−, NO3−) can be substantially reduced.
The SCIS embodiments provide a different approach to the problem of generating reactant ions from prior art embodiments as described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,949,741, wherein the reactant ion O2− is a minor constituent of the ion mix produced. In certain of the SCIS embodiments described herein, O3− accounts for 35% to 70% of the total ions produced, representing a significant increase in the capability to ionize samples. In testing the SCIS embodiments with a differential mobility spectrometer, a mass spectrometer, and chemical samples including chemical warfare agents (CWAs), MES (methyl salicylate), DPM (di(propylene glycol) monomethyl ether), CEES (2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide), DMMP (dimethyl methyl phosphonate), DIMP (diisopropyl Methylphosphonate), DEMP (diethyl methyl phosphonate), and solid explosives (e.g., dinitrotoluene), the tests demonstrated which ions the SCISs can generate and that the SCISs are effective in ionizing samples as vapor in air, as liquids on surfaces, and as solids, in both positive and negative modes.
A SCIS can be small, require low power, reliably produce different ions depending on the operating conditions and configuration, and produce ions that ionize many sample chemicals in different phases in air, or solutions, or on surfaces. It is desirable to have a SCIS that can ionize samples or analytes that are gases, liquids or solids and that can be in air or other gases, in solution or suspension or on solid supports or materials. It is also desirable to have a device that produces a sufficient quantity of ions from samples or analytes such that the ions can be detected by using laboratory or hand-held ion detectors. Further, it is desirable to be able to equally ionize samples or analytes having extremely low or largely different vapor pressures without the ionization device physically contacting the samples, analytes, or the surfaces upon which they reside. It is also desirable to provide an ionization method and device whereby either positive or negative, or positive and negative reactant or reagent ions are produced from air at or near atmospheric pressure. Further, it is desirable to provide an ionization device that simultaneously produces positive and negative ions from samples and analytes. It is also desirable to provide an ionization source that operates at atmospheric pressure in ambient or controlled composition air and that produces reagent ions, from such air, that can ionize samples and analytes. Additionally, it is desirable to use aerodynamic or ion optic means to control the reagent ion movement to the sample. Further, it is desirable to generate reagent ions and to control the clustering of such ions to maximize the amount of ions available to react with samples or analytes.
In one embodiment, an ionization source has a housing having a center post extending therefrom, a plurality of needles extending from the housing, and a counterelectrode ring extending around the housing. The plurality of needles extend substantially parallel to the center post. The number of needles has an effect on the shape and type of ions in the discharge. The center post is positioned substantially in the center of the plurality of needles. The plurality of needles are each coupled to an electrical supply. The center post and the plurality of needles extend through the counterelectrode ring. The plurality of needles, the center post (which can serve as a passive electrode when no voltage is applied to it), and the counterelectrode can all be insulated from each other. A first voltage can be applied to the plurality of needles to form a gas discharge. The counterelectrode ring can be coupled to an electrical supply and a second voltage can be applied to the counterelectrode ring. The center post may also be coupled to an electrical supply. A third voltage applied to the center post can shape the cloud of reagent or reactant ions produced by the gas discharge.
In another embodiment, a method for producing ions from a target comprises applying a first voltage to electrify a plurality of needles arranged in an array around a center post, wherein a counterelectrode extends around the plurality of insulated needles; and exposing the center post, the plurality of needles, and the counterelectrode to a gas. The electrified plurality of needles react with the gas to generate reagent or reactant ions, and the reagent or reactant ions cause ions to discharge from the target analyte.
In yet another embodiment, an ionization source assembly has a tube having a first end and a second end, wherein a gas comprising a sample flows into the first end of the tube. An ionization source is attached to the tube and has a center post extending therefrom. A plurality of needles extend from the ionization source in a direction substantially parallel to the center post, wherein the center post is positioned substantially in the center of the plurality of needles. The plurality of needles are coupled to an electrical supply. A counterelectrode ring extends around the ionization source. The center post and the plurality of needles extend through the counterelectrode ring. The counterelectrode ring can be coupled to an electrical supply and a second voltage can be applied to the counterelectrode ring. A first voltage applied to the plurality of needles forms a gas discharge. The center post, the plurality of needles, and the counterelectrode ring are positioned inside the tube and exposed to the gas comprising the sample entering the first end of the tube. The interaction of the reagent ions in the gas discharge and the sample produces ions that exit from the second end of the tube.
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
A soft chemical ionization source (SCIS) includes several components. As described herein, a SCIS may be referred to as an ionization source, a SCIS device, or the SCIS may be incorporated in an ionization source assembly. An array of needles protrude from an end of the SCIS device. Each needle has a sharpened point at its distal end. Each needle also has an insulating material that electrically insulates the needle from other needles. This insulating material can be positioned away from the sharpened point. In the center of the array of needles is a center post having a shaped tip. This center post may be electrically floating or be attached to a source of voltage. The center post may not have any insulation, but is electrically insulated from the needles by the insulating material on each needle. The center post must also be insulated from the counterelectrode. The insulated needles and the center post are housed within a metal tube known as a counterelectrode. Electrical connectors are coupled to each needle and, if needed, to the center post, such that different voltages and currents (pulsed or unpulsed) can be applied to the needles, the center post, and the counterelectrode. The counterelectrode may extend to cover the needles, or an additional open tube may be added to cover the needles. Such coverings change the types, distributions, and amounts of ions formed in the gas discharge. Additionally, at least one ion optic lens can be used in front of the needles to focus and/or to accelerate ions generated in the needle region towards a sample or an analyte. Air or other gases can flow around the center post and needle array towards the tips of the needles. Additionally, air or other gases can be introduced beyond the tips of the needles. In an alternative embodiment, two or more of these SCIS devices can be assembled on one platform to increase the amount of reagent ions produced and to provide simultaneous streams of positive and negative reagent ions. Furthermore, the SCIS device can be located within a tube with sample air moving towards, perpendicular to, or away from the device.
The SCIS device has a flow of energy whereby the reagent ions produce mostly molecular ions from sample molecules. The production of these molecular ions may be advantageous because most of the sample molecules are converted to a single ion, rather than a multiplicity of ions, thereby maximizing sensitivity and lowering the minimum amount of a material that can be detected by a given sensor, i.e., the limit of detection. The SCIS device examines a sizable target area (on the order of at least one cm2) that is representative of the volume of air, liquid, or solid surface being examined. The sample or analyte ions produced can be collected aerodynamically or with the aid of electric lenses that direct the ions to ion detection and identification means, such as an ion mobility spectrometer, a differential mobility spectrometer, or a mass spectrometer. Accordingly, the methods and devices described herein can perform positive ion, negative ion, or simultaneous positive ion and negative ion atmospheric pressure chemical ionization on sample chemicals in air, in liquids or on solids.
Referring to
The needles 110 can be arranged in a variety of configurations within a counterelectrode 130 in the device 100. In the exemplary embodiment, the arrangement of needles 110 can be in a circular array or, when using four needles, along the corners of a square. In this exemplary embodiment, four needles 110 are used in the array, but any number of needles can be used. For example, in an alternative embodiment, seven needles are used. The needles 110 within the array can be spaced about 0.18 to 0.25 inches from each other. The needles 110 can be arranged substantially parallel to each other or flare out relative to each other. Additionally, the distal ends 120 of each needle 110 are preferably within the same plane. Small variations on each needle's location may have an effect on the types, distributions, and quantities of ions produced. The needles 110 are substantially enclosed by an insulating material 140 that may be directly applied and bonded to the needle 110. Alternatively, the insulating material 140 may be wrapped or fitted around the needle 110 such that the needle end opposite the distal end 120 is completely covered. The insulating material 140 may be made of Teflon tubing or other suitable insulating material. An end 150 of the insulating material 140 closest to the distal end 120 of the needle 110 can optionally be tapered. The needles 110 are exposed extending from the insulation material 140 to the distal ends 120 of the needles 110. In one example, a needle length of about 0.25 inches is bare from the insulation material 140 to the end of the needle 110. The needle 110 can be attached to a wire so that the needle 110 can be electrified. In one embodiment, the needle 110 is attached to a wire at the end opposite the distal end 120.
The counterelectrode 230 can also influence the discharge. In an exemplary embodiment, the counterelectrode 230 is made of a metal tube. The counterelectrode 230 houses the array of insulated needles 210 and a center post 260. The counterelectrode 230 can have an insulating inner side 280 so that the needles 210 will not arc from the needle 210 to the inside of the counterelectrode 230. An end 290 of the counterelectrode 230 can be positioned in front of the needles 210, in the same plane as the ends of the needles 210, or behind the needles 210. In an alternative embodiment, instead of a tube configuration for the counterelectrode 230, a back plate can be used.
In an alternative embodiment, a separate tube can be positioned over the needles 210 to confine the discharged plasma. This separate tube can be connected to the counterelectrode 230 or it can be a removable tube that fits over the needles 210 and the counterelectrode 230. Positioning the tube over or beyond the needles 210 can significantly change the composition of reactant ions produced and the ions made from samples or analytes. In summary, by physically changing the spatial distances among the needles, the center post, and the counterelectrode, different reactant ions in a variety of distributions and quantities can be formed. Further, by changing the potentials applied to each of these three elements, the types, distributions, and quantities of reactant ions can be changed.
The same voltage amount can be applied to all needles 210. However, different voltages, continuous or pulsed, DC or AC, as square waves or other forms, can be applied to different needles 210 to achieve different reactant ion compositions. In one exemplary embodiment where a continuous DC voltage is applied, the voltage can be in the range of about 3 to 9 kV. Air flow can be in the range of about 0.0 to 8.0 L/minute. A significant “ion wind” may be produced when the device 200 is turned on in the absence of airflow. This ion wind can be sufficient to deliver ions to a surface, depending upon the application.
A gas can flow around the center post 260 and needles 210. In the exemplary embodiment, the gas is ambient air, though it is understood that any gas can be used. However, because ambient air is used, a source of another gas, such as a tank of helium, is not needed to produce the ions. The gas can be present in the environment in which the device 200 is being used. Alternatively, the device 200 can have one or more capillary tubes that can push or pull the gas through the device 200 to the region about the center post 260 and needles 210. These tubes or other types of pathways can be positioned between the center post 260 and the needles 210. The addition of a gas containing chemicals that can bind to, or react with, the ions formed by the discharge device can be beneficial in the detection of such ions by providing separation from similar species or from interferents.
Different configurations of one or more SCIS devices can produce different results. Two or more SCIS devices can be positioned close to one another such that the amount of ions produced from the combination is greater than the aggregate amount of ions produced by those SCIS devices separately. Referring to
In the exemplary configuration shown, each device 300, 305 can have opposite polarity. By positioning the devices in close proximity to each other, the ion distribution can be changed and the amount of ions produced can be increased at least four to six times. This configuration also produces more ions at less power. The configuration also results in a shift from ion clusters H+(H2O)2-4 to H+(H2O)1-2. This declustering can be useful because a positive ion is more likely to react with sample molecules if it is surrounded by less water molecules. This effect is shown in
Depending on operating conditions and placement of each of the two devices 300, 305 relative to each other, changing operating voltages can raise or lower all ions produced, or can increase one type of ion, while reducing the amount of other ions. For example, if the potential on a positive ionization source is zero, and the potential on a negative ionization source is varied from −3.2 kV to −7.8 kV, then an ion peak at 32 amu (O2) and the ion peak at 60 amu (CO3−) both decrease linearly as the potential changes from −3.2 kV to −7.8 kV. However, if the potential on the positive ionization source is fixed at 6.0 kV and the potential on the negative ionization source is varied from −4.5 kV to −7.8 kV, then an ion peak at 32 amu increases by about twice the amount, while an ion peak at 60 amu is reduced by about three times the amount. These relationships among potentials and ion production allow the selection of operating conditions wherein one type of ion is produced in much greater quantities than another type of ion. Specifically, with the positive ionization source set at 3.2 kV and the negative ionization source set at −7.8 kV, a negative ion peak at 32 amu is three times larger than all other ion peaks combined and six times larger than the ion peak at 60 amu. There are only traces of O3−, NO2−, and NO3− (combined=5% of the O2− peak). When the positive ionization source is set at a potential of 6.4 kV, and the negative ionization source is set at a potential of −3.7 kV, 19% and 62% of the total ion count are at 19 amu (H+(H2O)) and 37 amu (H+(H2O)2), respectively.
Without any ion focusing, each ionization source can act like a point source in that it produces a three dimensional cloud or field of ions that reaches in front of, around, and behind the needles. Hence, there is little degradation in the number of ions produced and, as the ionization source is moved relative to a target, there is little difficulty in ions reaching the target. Also, this means that the ion source can be either perpendicular or parallel to the sample or surface upon which the sample resides and still produce sample ions. If the two ionization sources have opposite polarities, then the positive ions predominate on one side, the negative ions predominate on the other side, and a volume around the center line has both types of ions. In an alternative embodiment, an ion optic lens can be used to focus the ions.
Referring to
In this exemplary embodiment, positive ions are shown, though it is recognized that a similar process is used for negative ions. The SCIS device can be used to produce both positive and negative ions, as well as mainly positive ions or mainly negative ions. In one embodiment, the SCIS device can produce more than 90% positive ions. In another embodiment, the SCIS device can produce more than 90% negative ions. Also, although ambient air is used in this exemplary embodiment, other types of reagent gases can be used.
Various SCISs can produce different results. In
While ambient air is preferably used as a gas, selectivity can be achieved by using a different gas that has a different ionization potential. For example, other gases include, but are not limited to, helium, ammonia (10.2 eV), acetone (9.7 eV), and di n-propylamine (7.8 eV). Reactant ions from each of these gases would ionize chemicals having ionization potentials less than that of the respective gas. Accordingly, selectivity can be based on ionization potential. Furthermore, the ions in the gas can combine with the sample or analyte ions to produce ion/molecular clusters that can aid in analyte ion identification and separation.
Either single or multiple SCISs can be used to directly generate ions from gases, liquids, or chemicals on solids. As described above,
These ions can be subsequently detected using ion detection/identification means, such as a microDMX differential mobility spectrometer made by Sionex Corporation. Referring to
The SCIS may also be used within a wide tube to produce ions from a gas stream.
In an alternative embodiment, referring to
In another alternative embodiment, referring to
In another embodiment, the needles, center post, counterelectrode, and insulation can be mounted on two small printed circuit boards. As seen in
The embodiments described above are intended to be exemplary. One skilled in the art recognizes that numerous alternative components and embodiments may be substituted for the particular examples described herein and still fall within the scope of the invention. Other variations and modifications that are not specifically set out in the description herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art and the described invention is to be limited only by the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3708661 | Hansen et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
4000918 | Reker | Jan 1977 | A |
4159423 | Kambara | Jun 1979 | A |
4209696 | Fite | Jun 1980 | A |
4256335 | Nielsen, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
4271357 | Bradshaw et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4300004 | Wissner et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4318028 | Perel et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4468468 | Benninghoven et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4531056 | Labowsky et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4542293 | Fenn et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4546253 | Tsuchiya et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4789783 | Cook | Dec 1988 | A |
4855595 | Blanchard | Aug 1989 | A |
4888482 | Kato | Dec 1989 | A |
4948962 | Mitsui et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4974648 | Propst | Dec 1990 | A |
4976920 | Jacob | Dec 1990 | A |
4977320 | Chowdhury et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4999492 | Nakagawa | Mar 1991 | A |
5141532 | Sacks et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142143 | Fite et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5164704 | Steen et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168068 | Yanagisawa et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171525 | Jacob | Dec 1992 | A |
5192865 | Zhu | Mar 1993 | A |
5280175 | Karl | Jan 1994 | A |
5304797 | Irie et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305015 | Schantz et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306910 | Jarrell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5338931 | Spangler et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5412208 | Covey et al. | May 1995 | A |
5412209 | Otaka et al. | May 1995 | A |
5436446 | Jarrell et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5485016 | Irie et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5541519 | Stearns et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5559326 | Goodley et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5581081 | Kato et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587581 | Stroosnyder | Dec 1996 | A |
5625184 | Vestal et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5684300 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5736740 | Franzen | Apr 1998 | A |
5747799 | Franzen | May 1998 | A |
5750988 | Apffel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753910 | Gourley et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756994 | Bajic | May 1998 | A |
5798146 | Murokh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5828062 | Jarrell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838002 | Sheehan | Nov 1998 | A |
5873523 | Gomez et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5892364 | Monagle | Apr 1999 | A |
5903804 | Kirkpatrick et al. | May 1999 | A |
5945678 | Yanagisawa | Aug 1999 | A |
5965884 | Laiko et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986259 | Hirabayachi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6040575 | Whitehouse et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6060705 | Whitehouse et al. | May 2000 | A |
6107628 | Smith et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124675 | Bertrand et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6147345 | Willoughby | Nov 2000 | A |
6204500 | Whitehouse et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207954 | Andrien, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223584 | Mustacich et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6225623 | Turner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239428 | Kunz | May 2001 | B1 |
6278111 | Sheehan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309610 | Nejezchleb et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6359275 | Bertsch et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6455846 | Prior et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462338 | Inatsugu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6465776 | Moini et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486469 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495823 | Miller et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6512224 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534765 | Robb et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537817 | Papen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6583407 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583408 | Smith et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6593570 | Li et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600155 | Andrien, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610986 | Hartley | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6649907 | Ebeling et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6683301 | Whitehouse et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6690004 | Miller et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6727496 | Miller et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6744041 | Sheehan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750449 | Marcus | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6784424 | Willoughby et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6815668 | Miller et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818889 | Sheehan et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6822225 | Xu et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6852969 | Marcus et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852970 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867415 | Hughey et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878930 | Willoughby et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888132 | Sheehan et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6914243 | Sheehan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943347 | Willoughby et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949740 | Sheehan et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949741 | Cody et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6972407 | Miller et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6998605 | Frazer et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7005634 | Shiokawa et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7041966 | Frazer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053367 | Tobita et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057168 | Miller et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060976 | Sheehan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064320 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078068 | Book | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083112 | Ivri | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087898 | Willoughby et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091493 | Hiraoka | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095019 | Sheehan et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7112785 | Laramee et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112786 | Russ, IV et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138626 | Karpetsky | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7253406 | Sheehan et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7259368 | Frazer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274015 | Miller et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7429731 | Karpetsky | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7576322 | Karpetsky et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7586092 | Karpetsky | Sep 2009 | B1 |
20020011560 | Sheehan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020175278 | Whitehouse | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020185593 | Doring | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020185595 | Smith et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030034452 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038236 | Russ, IV et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030197121 | Turecek et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040161856 | Handly | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040245458 | Sheehan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050056775 | Cody et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050196871 | Cody et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060249671 | Karpetsky | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070084999 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114389 | Karpetsky et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080296493 | Willoughby et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090294660 | Whitehouse et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100059689 | Horiike et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2127212 | Apr 1984 | GB |
2288061 | Oct 1995 | GB |
04215329 | Aug 1992 | JP |
05203637 | Aug 1993 | JP |
10088798 | Apr 1998 | JP |
WO 9314515 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9807505 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9963576 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0008455 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0008456 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0008457 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0133605 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0133605 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 03010794 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2004098743 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004110583 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2006011171 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006122121 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008054393 | May 2008 | WO |