The present invention is directed to the field of soft magnetic composites. In particular, the present invention is directed to a process of manufacturing soft composites that can withstand high temperatures and to soft magnetic composites made by the process.
The automobile industry is developing electric vehicles. A key component for electric vehicles is cost effective and energy-efficient materials that can be used to build electric motors with more efficient transformer induction cores. These energy-efficient materials enable building of smaller electric motors with equivalent or higher output at a lower cost. The transformer induction cores are typically constructed of silicon steel laminations that are insulated from one another with epoxy, and require a number of forming steps for fabrication that results significant waste from the manufacture. In addition, the planar lamination geometry of these induction cores limits their flux-carrying capability to two dimensions, thereby limiting the number of available options for designs of energy-efficient transformer induction cores.
There is a strong demand for alternative materials that can offer high formability, good magnetic properties, and resistance to eddy current losses that lead to increased power consumption. Soft magnetic composites (SMCs) are a class of materials that exhibit large magnetic permeability and saturation magnetization combined with high electrical resistivity. SMC's are used for electromagnetic cores in many household appliances including kitchen appliances, computers, cellular phones, and televisions. Such components are normally manufactured by conventional powder metal compaction processes often combined with other techniques, such as two step compaction, warm compaction, multi-step compaction and magnetic annealing followed by a heat treatment at a relatively low temperature.
Some SMC's have a metal core coated with a metal oxide layer. Various methods have been developed for providing metal oxide layers onto metals for different applications. These methods may involve, for example, deposition of a metal oxide layer onto a metal, epitaxial growth of a metal oxide layer on a metal and/or oxidation of a surface of the metal to form a metal oxide layer.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,214,712 discloses a process for growing a metal oxide thin film on a metal layer provided on a semiconductor surface using physical vapor deposition in a high-vacuum environment. The process involves the steps of heating the semiconductor surface and introducing hydrogen gas into the high-vacuum environment to develop conditions at the semiconductor surface which are favorable for depositing the metal layer on the semiconductor surface and unfavorable for the formation of native oxides on the semiconductor surface. Subsequently, atoms of metal oxide are directed toward the coated surface of the semiconductor by physical vapor deposition so that the atoms come to rest upon the metal coated semiconductor surface as a thin film of metal oxide.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,524,651 discloses a method for growing a crystalline metal oxide structure. The method comprises the steps of providing a substrate with a clean surface and depositing a metal on the substrate surface at high temperature under vacuum to form a metal-substrate compound layer on the surface with a thickness of less than one monolayer. The compound layer is then oxidized by exposing the compound layer to oxygen at a low partial pressure and low temperature. The method may further comprise the step of annealing the surface while under vacuum to further stabilize the oxidized film structure. A crystalline metal oxide structure may then be epitaxially grown by using the oxidized film structure as an interfacial template and depositing at least one layer of a crystalline metal oxide on the interfacial template.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,482,003 discloses a process that uses molecular beam epitaxy and/or electron beam evaporation to grow a layer of epitaxial alkaline earth oxide film on a substrate in an ultra-high vacuum. A metal is first deposited on the substrate from a flux source until a fraction of a monolayer of the metal covers the substrate surface. See col. 2, lines 25-28. The metal then reacts with oxygen to form a metal oxide that has a lattice parameter similar to that of the lattice structure which provides the material surface. A film of epitaxial layers of the metal oxide is then grown with the selected metal and within the facility so that the lattice parameter of the layers of grown oxide closely approximate the lattice structure of the material surface to reduce the likelihood of lattice strain at the interfaces of the material surface and the epitaxial layers of the alkaline earth oxide built thereon.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,686,894 discloses a method for manufacturing a magnetically soft powder composite material including the following steps: a) preparation of a starting mixture including a pure iron powder, a phosphatized iron powder, or an iron alloy powder and a soft ferrite powder, b) mixing the starting mixture, c) compacting the starting mixture in a press under increased pressure, d) debinding the compacted starting mixture in an inert gas atmosphere or in an oxygen-containing gas atmosphere, and e) heat treating the compacted starting mixture in an oxidizing gas atmosphere at a temperature of 410° C. to 500° C.
2005/0019558 discloses a method for manufacturing a composite of ferromagnetic particles with a magnetite coating. The method comprises coating ferromagnetic particles with magnetite and compacting the particles to a desired shape. The ferromagnetic particles comprise iron or iron alloys. The ferromagnetic particles are coated with iron oxide in the magnetite form (Fe3O4). The magnetite coating may be formed by conversion of iron in the iron particles to iron oxide. The coated ferromagnetic particles may optionally be coated with an additional coating comprising a metal oxide, a polymeric resin or a combination of the two.
An important issue with traditional SMCs lies in their electrically insulating coating. These insulating coatings typically cannot withstand post-compaction heating, which results in degraded magnetic and electrical properties of the SMC, limiting its use in electromagnetic devices. The present invention provides improved soft magnetic composite materials with a material layer that is mechanically durable and electrically insulating and which can withstand higher temperatures. The present invention also provides processes for producing the improved soft magnetic composites.
The present invention has numerous applications, not limited to soft magnetic composites. A solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is one example of how metallic powders can be coated and used as performance material. Electric connections between metallic powders are necessary for SOFCs, to separate the anode from the cathode. Additionally, coatings are used for connections between cells and for oxidation protection of powders. Coating iron-alloy powders with electrical conductive particles via high-energy ball milling and the process described in this invention, is a viable method for SOFC applications. Applications ranging from the automobile industry to implantable medical devices are feasible with the present invention.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a soft magnetic composite comprising a ferromagnetic material selected from iron and iron alloys; and an oxide, wherein the ferromagnetic material is covered by a layer comprising the oxide, and an interface between the ferromagnetic material and the layer comprising the oxide contains antiphase domain boundaries.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a process for producing ferromagnetic particles including the steps of depositing an oxide layer onto a ferromagnetic core comprising a material selected from iron and iron alloys by molecular beam epitaxy at a partial oxygen pressure of from about 1×10−5 Torr to about 1×10−Torr.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a soft magnetic composite produced by compacting a plurality of ferromagnetic particles made by the above process.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a process for producing a soft magnetic composite including the steps of milling a ferromagnetic material powder and an oxide powder to form a milled mixture; compacting the milled mixture to form a compact; and annealing the compact at a temperature of from about 400° C. to about 1200° C. to form a soft magnetic composite, wherein the ferromagnetic material powder comprises a material selected from iron powder and iron alloy powders.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a soft magnetic composite produced by the above process.
For illustrative purposes, the principles of the present disclosure are described by referencing various exemplary embodiments. Although certain embodiments are specifically described herein, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that the same principles are equally applicable to, and can be employed in other systems and methods. Before explaining the disclosed embodiments of the present disclosure in detail, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of any particular embodiment shown. Additionally, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Furthermore, although certain methods are described with reference to steps that are presented herein in a certain order, in many instances, these steps may be performed in any order as may be appreciated by one skilled in the art; the novel method is therefore not limited to the particular arrangement of steps disclosed herein.
It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Furthermore, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. The terms “comprising”, “including”, “having” and “constructed from” can also be used interchangeably.
As used herein, “soft magnetic composite” is a material composed of surface-insulated ferromagnetic powder particles with three-dimensional magnetic flux capabilities. The term “soft” indicates that the magnetic composite possesses a high permeability may be easily magnetized or demagnetized.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a soft magnetic composite comprising a ferromagnetic material insulated with an electrically insulating material containing at least one oxide. The soft magnetic composite of the present invention has an electrical resistivity and magnetic flux density suitable for use in electric motors. Higher resistivity results in lower eddy current losses in alternating magnetic field applications, which reduces energy waste. Second, high magnetic flux density allows development of a strong magnetic field, which enables maximizing the force that can be applied in an electromechanical part.
The ferromagnetic material may be iron or iron alloys such as iron-silicon (Fe—Si), iron-aluminum (Fe—Al), iron-silicon-aluminum (Fe—Si—Al), iron-nickel (Fe—Ni), iron-cobalt (Fe—Co), iron-cobalt-nickel (Fe—Co—Ni), iron-chromium (Fe—Cr), stainless steel (Fe—Cr—Ni) or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the iron alloys are low carbon steel comprising carbon and manganese, typically less than 0.2 weight percent (wt %) carbon (C) and less than 1 wt % manganese (Mn); Fe—Si alloys may contain less than 3.5 wt % silicon (Si). Fe—Al alloys may contain less than 10 wt % Al. Fe—Co alloys may have a composition comprising about 49 wt % Fe, 49 wt % Co and 2 wt % vanadium (V). Fe—Ni alloys may comprise about 55 wt % Fe and 45 wt % Ni. Fe—Cr alloys may contain less than 20 wt % Cr. Stainless steel alloys may have a composition comprising of less than 20 wt % Cr, 15 wt % Ni, with the balance being mostly Fe. A suitable ferromagnetic material is high purity iron (100 wt % Fe).
The oxide used as the electrically insulating material may be any oxide with high electrical resistivity and/or good room temperature magnetic properties. Examples of suitable oxides include MgO, Fe3O4, NiFe2O4, CuFe2O4, CoFe2O4, MnxZn1-xFe2O4, NixZn1-xFe2O4, CoxZn1-xFe2O4, Cr2O3, or Al2O3 for “x” values ranging from 0 to 1. The electrically insulating material may be a thin, continuous layer on the ferromagnetic material core. In some embodiments, when the ferromagnetic material is in the form of particles, the electrically insulating material covers the ferromagnetic material particles such that the electrically insulating material separates and insulates the ferromagnetic material particles from each other. The thickness of the electrically insulating material layer may be from 10 nm to 500 nm, or from 10 nm to 300 nm, or from 10 nm to 100 nm.
The soft magnetic composite of the present invention may be characterized by certain structural features. The ferromagnetic material-oxide interface may have a significant number of dislocations. This type of interface boundary is a crystallographic defect in which regions of the atomic structure are ordered in opposite directions referred to as an “antiphase domain boundary” (see Kasama, T., et al. “Off-axis electron holography observation of magnetic microstructure a in a magnetite (001) thin film containing antiphase domains,” Physical Review B. vol. 73, page 104432 (2006); and D. T. Margulies, et al. Physical Review B. vol. 53, page 9175 (1996), all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety).
The density of the antiphase domain boundaries may depend on film geometry. Gilks et al., “Magnetism and magnetotransport in symmetry matched spinels: Fe3O4/MgAl2O4,” J. Applied Physics, vol. 113, pages 17B107 (2013) found that the formation of antiphase domain boundaries in Fe3O4 film does not depend on dislocation densities, but instead results from three-dimensional film growth. Moreover, Moussy et al., “Thickness dependence of anomalous magnetic behavior in epitaxial thin films: Effect of density of antiphase boundaries ,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 70, pages 174448 (2004) have shown an inverse dependence of APB density on film thickness, suggesting that this is tunable.
The antiphase domain boundary has a significant effect on the magnetic behavior of the soft magnetic composite of the present invention. For example, the antiphase domain boundary may provide an increase in magnetization at the interface of the ferromagnetic and oxide layers.
In some embodiments, the surface of the ferromagnetic material may have a thin layer of Fe2O3, which may be formed by exposing the ferromagnetic material to oxygen in order to oxidize the iron on the surface of the ferromagnetic material to Fe2O3. In one embodiment, this Fe2O3 layer has a thickness of about 2-3 nm. This layer imposes an exchange bias on the underlying layer as well as a decrease in saturation magnetization, as a function of the thickness of the layer. Additionally there exists a transition from predominately Néel to Bloch domain wall types that results in a transition from increasing to decreasing coercivity at the interface with the Fe2O3 layer.
Without being bound by theory, it is thought that exchange bias arises from an interfacial exchange interaction between uncompensated spins in an antiferromagnetic (AF) layer and free spins in an adjacent ferromagnetic (FM) layer. This exchange interaction pins the spins of the FM, imposing an additional exchange field (or bias) on it. Because Fe2O3 is a weak AF, it exerts a significantly large bias on the FM layer. When the surface Fe2O3 layer is thin, uncompensated spins are able to rotate with the adjacent FM spins due to weak AF coupling. As the thickness of the AF layer increases, the coupling strength increases. Eventually a point is reached where the AF layer imposes a significant bias on the FM layer.
The Fe2O3 layer may also result in significant differences in the shape of the measured magnetic hysteresis loops of the soft magnetic composite. The combined Fe2O3 layer and ferromagnetic material possess a significant in-plane uniaxial anisotropy imposed by the exchange bias, and thus has a harder, further shifted loop. The presence of the Fe2O3 layer may also provide a discernible increase in the coercivity of the soft magnetic composites. Particularly, the coercivity increases as a function of the thickness of the Fe2O3 layer. The presence of the Fe2O3 layer may also decrease the saturation magnetization of the soft magnetic composite.
In summary, the microstructure of the soft magnetic composite, especially the ferromagnetic material-oxide material interlayer boundaries and optional Fe2O3 layer, may play a significant role in mediating saturation magnetization and coercivity.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for manufacturing the soft magnetic composite (
Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) is a well-known process where molecular deposition is conducted in an ultra-high vacuum growth chamber. In typical molecular beam epitaxy equipment, a substrate material is positioned in the chamber for receiving the molecular deposition. The substrate may be, for example, MgO. The substrate may be subjected to direct heating to maintain the substrate at a desirable temperature in a range of from 250° C. to 600° C. during deposition. In addition, the ultra-high vacuum growth chamber is evacuated to a pressure of below ˜10−6 Pa, or below ˜5×10−7 Pa, or below ˜10−8 Pa, or below ˜10−9 Pa, to ensure that no stray molecules adsorb onto the surface. A plurality of canisters are provided for providing a vapor source of metal desired to be deposited on the material's receiving surface during the molecular deposition process. Each canister may hold a different metal and contains heating elements for vaporizing the metal. An opening is provided for each canister, and a shutter is associated with the canister with movement between a closed position at which the interior of the canister is closed and thereby isolated from the growth chamber and an open position at which the contents of the canister, i.e., the metal vapor, is released to the growth chamber. In addition, an oxygen source is connected to the growth chamber so that by opening and closing a valve associated with the oxygen source, oxygen can be delivered to or shut off from the chamber. The opening and closing of each canister shutter and the oxygen source valve may be accurately controlled by a computer.
If two or more metals are employed in the MBE process, the ratio of the metals may be controlled by the amount of each metal provided to the growth chamber to allow precise compositions to be deposited on the receiving material (ferromagnetic material). The presence of oxygen in the growth chamber will oxidize the metal and thus form an oxide to be deposited on the ferromagnetic material core. A skilled person will appreciate that desired oxide(s) may be formed in the growth chamber by controlling the amount of metal(s) and oxygen supplied to the growth chamber.
In some embodiments, the formation of a crystal structure as the oxide is being deposited on the ferromagnetic material may be monitored by reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED). This allows for evaluation of crystalline layers in order to determine if undesirable, amorphous oxide layers are produced. The thickness of the oxide layer may be from 10 nm to 500 nm, or from 10 nm to 300 nm, or from 10 nm to 100 nm.
In some embodiments, at least a portion of the ferromagnetic material is also deposited on the ferromagnetic material core. This ferromagnetic material may be the same or a different ferromagnetic material than the material of the core.
Referring to
The molecular beam epitaxy method allows epitaxial growth of single crystals on the ferromagnetic material. This method provides very accurate compositional control and ensures crystalline purity. The ability to introduce multiple elements into the ultra-high vacuum growth chamber of the molecular beam epitaxy at the same time is beneficial. Since the shutters to each elemental-containing canister may be controlled via a computer, multiple shutters can be opened at the same time, allowing for complex oxides to be deposited, with precise control of the composition and thickness of the oxide layer. For example, to deposit nickel ferrite (NiFe2O4), iron and nickel atoms are released into the growth chamber in the presence of oxygen. The amount of metals released may also be used to control the oxide deposition rate.
Another advantage of molecular beam epitaxy is that beams of evaporated atoms may be directed up the growth chamber toward the receiving surface, thus preventing the elemental atoms from interacting with one another until they reach the receiving surface. This is because of the long mean free path of the atoms, achieved under sufficient pressure (for example, below 10−5 Torr).
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a plastic deformation based method for manufacturing the soft magnetic composite from a ferromagnetic material and an oxide (
Any apparatus suitable for grinding or mixing particles by inducing severe plastic deformation such as high energy ball mills may be used for the milling step. In an exemplary embodiment, the milling step may be performed by a high-energy ball mill SPEX Sample Prep 8000D Mixer/Mill. High energy ball milling has been describe previously in Le Caër, “High-Energy Ball-Milling of Alloys and Compounds,” Hyperfine Interactions, vol. 141-142, pages 63-72, (2002), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The particle size of the ferromagnetic material powders may be from about 10 μm to about 1000 μm, or from about 30 μm to about 700 μm, or from about 50 μm to about 600 μm, or from about 100 μm to about 500 μm, or from about 250 μm to about 400 μm. In some embodiments, the ferromagnetic material powders may have multiple sizes of particles.
The particle size for the oxide powders may be from about 10 nm to about 50 μm, or from about 50 nm to about 20 μm, or from about 50 nm to about 10 μm, or from about 1 μm to 5 μm or from about 50 nm to about 100 nm. In some embodiments, the oxide powders may include a combination of at least two types of particles, for example, a combination of particles of 1 μm to 5 μm and nanoparticles of 50 nm to 100 nm.
In some embodiments, the particle size difference between the ferromagnetic powder and oxide powder should be sufficiently large to ensure adequate coating of the oxide particles onto the ferromagnetic material particles and for maximum magnetization and minimum coercivity results. In some embodiments, the particle size ratio between the ferromagnetic material powder and oxide powder is about 5 to about 40,000, or from about 10 to about 15,000, or from about 50 to about 1,5000, or from about 100 to about 1000.
High-energy milling is one way to mechanically mill the particles in of the ferromagnetic and oxide powder mixtures. The milling produces large amounts of strain in the powder by grinding away rigid edges to form a more uniform surface area while maintaining the overall size. In one aspect, the mechanical milling step results in severe plastic deformation of the particles to change the shape of the particles, preferably into substantially spherical or spherical particles. The mechanical milling step also renders the surface area of the ferromagnetic particles substantially uniform or uniform. The mechanical milling step also reduces the porosity of the ferromagnetic particles, by decreasing internal air gaps with sufficient amount of deformation or mill time. Small grinding media, in the range of 0.5 mm to 3 mm, is preferred over large grinding media of >5 mm in order to increase the number of contact points between the powder and media balls. Mechanical milling allows for the porosity to be reduced or minimized, depending on the length of time and ratio of powders to grinding media used. The process may achieve high coverage of the ferromagnetic powder with the oxide particles, with coverage greater than 90%, or greater than 95%, or at about 100%. High-energy ball milling is one example of a method for carrying out mechanical milling. Equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) and high pressure torsion (HPT) mechanical milling techniques also allow for severe plastic deformation of particles to change their shape by compacting the particles under high pressure.
A skilled technician may determine the mill time by monitoring the formation and coating of the oxide material layer with techniques such as TEM or SEM. One way to determine an appropriate milling time is to optimize milling for formation of a single oxide particle layer on the ferromagnetic particles in combination with achieving a high coverage of the ferromagnetic particle of at least 90% or greater. In some embodiments, the milling time is from about 1 to about 5 hours, or from about 1.5 to about 4 hours, or from about 2 to about 3 hours.
In other embodiments, polymeric resins may be added to the milling step. The polymeric resin may be selected from a wide variety of thermoplastic resins, thermosetting resins, and blends of thermoplastic resins, or blends of thermoplastic resins with thermosetting resins. The polymeric resin may also be a blend of polymers, copolymers, terpolymers, dendrimers, ionomers or combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing polymeric resins.
Examples of thermoplastic resins include polyacetals, polyacrylics, polycarbonates, polystyrenes, polyolefins, polyurethanes, polyesters, polyamides, polyamideimides, polyarylates, polyurethanes, polyarylsulfones, polyethersulfones, polyarylene sulfides, polyvinyl chlorides, polysulfones, polyetherimides, polytetrafluoroethylenes, polyetherketones, polyether etherketones, and combinations thereof. Examples of blends of thermoplastic resins include acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene/nylon, polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, polyphenylene ether/polystyrene, polyphenylene ether/polyamide, polycarbonate/polyester, polyphenylene ether/polyolefin, and combinations thereof.
Examples of polymeric thermosetting materials include polyurethanes, natural rubber, synthetic rubber, epoxy, phenolic, polyesters, polyamides, silicones, and combinations thereof. Blends of thermosetting resins, as well as blends of thermoplastic resins with thermosetting can also be utilized.
The milling step may be conducted in, for example, a hardened steel vial with hardened steel balls as grinding media. Other grinding media and containers such as alumina or zirconia may be employed, and combinations of various media vials with various media balls may be used depending on necessary hardness ratings for deforming powders. For example, alumina grinding balls can be milled with powder in a hardened steel vial, to ensure more deformation, due to alumina being a harder material than steel, when ball-to-powder contact occurs. Though the media materials should be selected to minimize contamination of the composite with the material of the grinding media or container. In some embodiments, the vial and grinding media may be pre-coated with pure iron powder to minimize potential contamination. Pre-coating may be performed by milling the grinding media with pure iron for up to 24 hours until a uniform coating layer on the grinding media vial and balls are formed.
The grinding media may have a diameter of from about 0.1 mm to about 12 mm, or from about 0.5 mm to about 6 mm, or from about 1 mm to about 3 mm. The pre-coating may be conducted for a period of from about 0.5 hour to about 48 hours, or from about 1 to about 24 hours, or from about 4 to about 12 hours, or from about 6 to about 8 hours.
The ferromagnetic material may optionally be annealed prior to the milling step, for the purpose of improving the magnetic properties of the ferromagnetic material and the composites derived therefrom. This step is referred to as pre-milling annealing. The ferromagnetic material powder may be subjected to pre-milling annealing at temperatures of from about 500° C. to about 1200° C., or from 600° C. to 1000° C., or from 700° C. to 900° C. The pre-milling annealing may be carried out for a time period of from about 15 minutes to about 150 minutes, or from 30 minutes to 120 minutes, or from 40 minutes to 100 minutes. In one embodiment, the pre-milling anneal is carried out at a temperature of about 800° C. for a time period of about 60 minutes.
The pre-milling anneal step may be carried out in any protective atmosphere, such as, for example, argon, nitrogen, hydrogen, or a combination thereof, to avoid surface oxidation of ferrous powders. In one embodiment, the pre-milling annealing is a decarburizing annealing process that is performed under a standard decarburizing atmosphere to reduce the carbon content in the particulates to lower levels than are found in the ferromagnetic material particles prior to annealing. Carbon levels may be reduced to as low as 0.0002 wt % depending on the decarburizing process conditions and the carbon level of the starting ferromagnetic material.
In some embodiments, the milling step may comprises two sub-steps: milling the ferromagnetic material particles with the media for a period from about 1 hour to about 24 hours, or from about 2 hours to about 12 hours, or from about 4 hours to about 8 hours to deform the ferromagnetic particles and subsequently milling the deformed ferromagnetic particles with an oxide powder. The first milling step can be employed to severely deform the ferromagnetic material particles into spheres, reduce their porosity or internal air gaps, and increase their surface area uniformity. After removing the media from the ferromagnetic particles, an oxide powder is added and the deformed ferromagnetic material particles are then milled with the oxide powder to coat the ferromagnetic particles. This second milling step may be performed for from about 0.5 hour to about 2.5 hours, or from about 0.75 hour to about 2 hours, or from about 0.75 hour to about 1.5 hours.
In some embodiments, the milling step is a one-step procedure: milling the ferromagnetic particles without media and with an oxide powder for a period of about 1 hour to about 24 hours, or from about 2 hours to about 12 hours, or from about 4 hours to about 8 hours. This minimizes plastic deformation, since there is an absence of media balls, only powder-to-powder and powder-to-vial contacts are made. Irregular shapes are maintained, though the oxide coating is the least uniform and unpredictable.
After the milling steps, the ferromagnetic material particles are at least partially or completely covered with an oxide layer. The oxide layer on the ferromagnetic material particles may be as thin as possible while still being capable of insulating adjacent ferromagnetic particles from each other such that an insulation value of from about 0.5 to about 20 milli-Ohm centimeters, or from about 1 to about 15 milli-Ohm centimeters, or from about 2 to about 12 milli-Ohm centimeters, or from about 4 to about 10 milli-Ohm centimeters is obtained. The thickness of the oxide layer may be from about 10 nm to about 500 nm, or from about 10 nm to about 300 nm, or from about 10 nm to about 100 nm.
High-energy milling such as high-energy ball milling allows for severe plastic deformation of powder mixtures that can create powder mixtures not limited by the starting powder shape. For example, uniform powders are not required as starting materials for high-energy ball milling. This technique avoids the cost of preparing spherical, uniformly shaped powders as may be required by other processes such as gas atomization. In addition, severe plastic deformation reduces or minimizes porosity of the powders, depending on the length of the milling time and the ratio of powders to grinding media that are employed.
Referring to
The oxide layer is capable of binding adjacent ferromagnetic particles together with exertion of sufficient force during compacting. Through compacting, transverse rupture strength is imparted to the compact such that acceptable mechanical properties can be achieved via compaction without simultaneous or subsequent sintering. A transverse rupture strength of from about 50 mega Pascals (MPa) to about 130 MPa, or from about 70 MPa to about 110 MPa, or from about 80 MPa to about 100 MPa is desirable, as determined in accordance with the protocol of the American Society of Test Materials (ASTM) MPIF Standard 41.
Referring to
In one embodiment, as shown in
The high energy milling process produces soft magnetic composites with low coercivity and high magnetization. The oxide layer may include oxides of metals that are different from the metal(s) in the ferromagnetic material core, which may provide the capability of producing soft magnetic composites with desirable magnetic properties. For example, different applications for the soft magnetic composites, such as jet engines, high-speed rail engines, household fans and DVD players may require different magnetic properties. Variations of iron, nickel, cobalt, silicon, chromium etc. independently in both the ferromagnetic material core and oxide layer allow for customization of the soft magnetic composition by providing different magnetic properties. These compositional differences may be achieved by selection of the starting ferromagnetic material(s) and oxide metals.
Another advantage of the high energy milling process is that more accurate control of the thickness of the oxide layer can be achieved as compared to some other processes. By varying one or more of the milling parameters, the size of the oxide powder particles, as well as the relative amount of the oxide powder employed, the process allows coatings of a desired thickness to be applied to the ferromagnetic material core. Very thin oxide layers can be applied by this process, with the oxide layer still providing the desired degree of insulation. This process can also ensure full coverage of the ferromagnetic material particles with oxide layer for eliminating the possibility of the ferromagnetic material powder welding to itself during compaction or annealing, which could result in an undesirable increase in eddy current losses. Full coverage would also make for a stronger and denser product. Particle collisions during the milling step helps to achieve full coverage by producing spherical ferromagnetic powder particles, which are easier to coat uniformly, have higher magnetization, and reduce porosity in the ferromagnetic material as well as in the oxide layer. The collisions also create bonding at the interface between the ferromagnetic powder particles and the oxide layer, which provides desirable magnetic properties. For example, the bonds formed by ferromagnetic particles and the oxide layer may provide lower coercivity and reduced eddy currents, as well as a softer magnetic composite.
The present invention may employ bulk ferromagnetic powder and nanoparticles of oxide powder. Variation of the particle sizes for both ferromagnetic powder and oxide powder allows for more precise control over the magnetic and electrical properties. The present invention provides soft magnetic composites having a high electrical resistivity and magnetic flux density that enable manufacturing of more efficient electric motors that can tolerate high temperatures.
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
The following examples are illustrative, but not limiting, of the methods and compositions of the present disclosure. Other suitable modifications and adaptations of the variety of conditions and parameters normally encountered in the field, and which are obvious to those skilled in the art, are within the scope of the disclosure.
Commercial 1×1 cm2 MgO (001) substrates purchased from MTI Corporation were cleaned using acetone and isopropyl alcohol. Nominally, 40 nm Fe3O4 layers were deposited on these substrates using molecular beam epitaxy at a pO2≈2×10−6 Torr. Iron layers with different thicknesses (20, 22.5, 25, and 30 nm) were then deposited on the substrate without substrate heating. These thicknesses were chosen to coincide with a measured penetration thickness of the SMOKE signal for this system. These iron layers permit pseudo-depth profiling using the SMOKE technique.
The bilayer films formed in Example 1 were studied with X-ray diffraction (XRD). Measurements were taken from 2θ=20 to 80° at room temperature using Cu Kα (λ=1.541 Å) radiation at 44 kV and 40 mA. The patterns were normalized to the intensity of the MgO (002) substrate reflection for comparison and analyzed using the Jade software package.
Referring to
The bilayer films formed in Example 1 were studied with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Cross-sectional TEM samples were prepared using conventional polishing techniques. Small sections were glued to one another using Epotek brand M-Bond epoxy and then cured for several hours at 100° C. These sections were polished to about 10 μm thickness using a low-speed polishing wheel and diamond lapping film. They were then iron milled using a Fischione 1010 Low-Angle iron Mill operating at 0.5-1.5 keV and 10-15° incidence angle. Bright field and diffraction images were taken using a JEOL 2100 LaB6 TEM operating at 200 keV.
Referring to
Bulk in-plane magnetic hysteresis of the bilayer films formed in Example 1 was measured using a Quantum Design PPMS Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM) at 300 K along the MgO<100> direction at room temperature, shown in
Powder mixtures were prepared in a high-energy ball mill (SPEX 8000). Two types of pure iron powder were used, coarse (diameters of 420 μm to 150 μm) and fine (diameters of 150 μm to 45 μm).
Compacts were prepared by compaction with roughly 725 ksi of force in a die press. This compaction technique is extremely advantageous in that complex geometries are possible and any shape of powder is compactable. The compacts underwent subsequent curing in a vacuum furnace under argon and hydrogen atmosphere, for one hour at temperatures ranging from 500° C. to 1000° C.
In this example, iron powder was milled with 0.5 to 3 mm alumina media balls in an alumina vial for time ranging from 2 to 24 hours in air. No oxide material was added. Powders were then compacted at 725 ksi pressure and cured at 500° C. or 900° C. Milled iron powder were characterized using x-ray diffraction (XRD) for analysis of internal defects and morphology.
Magnetization results from vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) measurements for powders milled from 2 to 24 hours and then compacted and cured at 500° C. or 900° C., are shown in
In this example, 4 g of coarse Fe powder and 8 g of 2 mm hardened steel balls were milled in a hardened steel vial for 2 hours. The media balls were removed, followed by adding 40 mg of bulk Fe3O4 and milling for an additional hour. The resultant mixture was compacted. The compacts were cured at 500° C. and 900° C. for one hour.
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meanings of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/118,001, filed on Dec. 10, 2020, which, in turn, is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/101,056, filed on Jun. 2, 2016, which, in turn, is a 371 continuation of International patent application no. PCT/US14/71911 filed on Dec. 22, 2014, which, in turn, claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 61/921,030, filed on Dec. 26, 2013.
This invention was made with government support under Grant No. 1031403 awarded by the U.S. National Science Foundation. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61921030 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17118001 | Dec 2020 | US |
Child | 18175572 | US | |
Parent | 15101056 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 17118001 | US |