The present invention relates generally to the licensing of computational components and specifically to the licensing of spare computational components.
To provide high levels of reliability and availability, it is common to provide spare or redundant computational components.
In telecommunication applications, spare processors can be configured in many different ways. In one configuration, the spare processors 612a-n are referred as Survivable Remote Processors or SRPs, and each serves a corresponding port network (not shown). If the corresponding connection 616a-n to the switch/server 600 goes down (causing a loss of network connectivity) and/or if the main and duplicated processors fail (and the link to the corresponding port network or the expansion interface comes up), each of the survivable remote processors 612a-n is activated and serves its corresponding port network. In another configuration, the spare processors 612a-n are referred to as Local Spare Processors or LSPs, and each serves a corresponding packet-switched media gateway (not shown). If the LSP is contacted by a network node, such as a telephone or media gateway processor, that is preinstructed to use or register with the LSP in the event of malfunctions of the main and duplicated processors, the LSP is activated and serves the network nodes contained in its preassigned network region. In yet another configuration, the spare processors 612a-n are referred to as Wide Area Network Spare Processors or WSPs, and each WSP is configured to operate the entire network and not just a portion of the network as in the case of the SRP and LSP. To avoid conflicts, the WSPs are arranged in a hierarchy such that each WSP is only activated in the event that the main and duplicated processor and the WSP(s) higher in the hierarchy (if any) are not operational. A WSP periodically polls the main and/or duplicated processors and WSP(s) higher in the hierarchy and, if a response is not received within a configurable time period, the WSP concludes that the corresponding polled processor is not operational.
The use of SRPs, LSPs, and/or WSPs can cause difficulties in providing right-to-use protection and software copy protection. Typically, spare processors are sold at a significant discount relative to main processors. The rationale is that the software on the spare processor is used less and should therefore cost less than the main processor's software. This presents an opportunity for customers to deprive the software supplier of revenue by buying the spare processor software and using it as the main processor software.
Existing licensing approaches do not address this problem. In one telecommunications licensing approach for example, a valid license file is required to run a computational component. This approach is discussed in detail in copending U.S. patent application entitled “Securing Feature Activation in a Telecommunication System”, Ser. No. 09/357,679, filed Jul. 20, 1999, to Serkowski, which is incorporated herein by this reference. In such licensing verification systems, the license file contains a serial number that must be present on the processor that is to execute the licensed software for the license to be valid and the software to be executable. In telecommunication applications, the serial number of the main processor 604 must be in the license file for the processor 604 to run the licensed software.
The license file also contains a software name and/or version of the licensed telecommunication application and licensed features. The data structures corresponding to the features are of two types. In a type 1 feature, the data structures reflected enablement or disablement of the corresponding feature using a simple on/off state. Examples of features falling into this category include abbreviated dialing enhanced list, audible message waiting, vectoring, answer supervision by call classifier, ATM trunking, agent states, dial by name, DCS call coverage, echo cancellation, multifrequency signaling, and wideband switching. In a type 2 feature, the data structures include a single numeric value and/or a name kind of entry. Examples of features falling into this category include logged-in agents, offer category, maximum numbers of concurrently registered IP stations, administered IP trunks, ports, and concurrently administered remote office stations/trunks, and call center release.
This licensing scheme is not configured for licensing spare processors such that they cannot be permanently used as main processors. To provide the desired reliability and availability of redundant systems, not only the main but also the spare processors must be able to be enabled by the licensing verification system. However, if a license is provided for a spare processor, there is nothing to prevent the spare processor from being used as a main processor on a permanent basis.
These and other needs are addressed by the various embodiments and configurations of the present invention. The present invention provides a method and system that uses a backup flag and or license timer to enable selectively a backup computational system or functional part thereof in the event that the primary computational system is not able to operate effectively.
In one embodiment, a method for protecting actuation of a computational component is provided. The method includes the steps of:
The primary and backup computational components can be any entity capable of performing a task or executing instructions, e.g., a logic-containing board or chip such as an application specific integrated circuit or ASIC, a (control) processor, software, etc. In one configuration, the computational components are duplicates of one another. For example, the computational components can be two processors one of which is a standby processor and the other of which is an active processor.
The license error timer can be implemented in any suitable manner, such as a countdown or countup timer. In either implementation, the first value can be a single value or a range of values. In one configuration, the timer value is saved in non-volatile memory that is preserved across system resets so the customer cannot reset the timer and return the backup computational component to service by performing resets. In this manner, the customer can use the backup computational component in the operational mode for only a predetermined and manufacturer configurable time period.
What is required for a computational component to be in the operational mode depends upon the particular application. Generally, the computational component is in the operational mode until the computational component experiences at least a predetermined degree of operational impairment. The impairment can be caused by the malfunction of the computational component itself or hardware or software associated with the computational component, such as a loss of network connectivity, a circuit malfunction, or software being corrupted.
Commonly, the backup computational component is in a standby mode while the primary computational component is in the operational mode. In the standby mode, the backup computational component generally is subservient to the main processor and/or provides, at most, only minimal and/or ancillary processing to the network.
License modes can be used to control the operations of the primary and backup computational components. In one configuration, the primary and backup computational components are each set to a first or license-normal mode when a number of license checks are successfully verified. The computational components are set to a second or license-error mode when certain license checks are unsuccessfully verified and time remains on the license timer. The components are set to a third or no-license mode when certain license checks are unsuccessfully verified and/or no time remains on the license timer. Typically, the backup computational component is only in the first license mode when it is also in the standby mode. The backup computational component is set to the second or third license mode when it is no longer in the standby mode. The backup computational component is reset to the first license mode when it is able to contact the primary computational component and relinquish control of the system to the primary computational component and again enter the standby mode.
The backup computational component can have a license file stored in a separate location from the license file of the primary computational component. The license file typically includes at least one unique identifier associated with the backup computational component, a backup flag, a platform type, a platform identifier and a plurality of application definitions. Each application definition corresponds to one of a plurality of applications and comprises release information, license expiration information, and one or more types of feature keyword information.
As will be appreciated, the relationship between the actuated computational component and identifier in the license file can take many forms. In one configuration, the computational component is software, and the identifier is associated with a hardware component configured to execute the software. For example, the primary backup and computational components are control processors and steps (c) and (d) determine whether another computational component, namely a software application, will be executed by the backup computational component. In this configuration, the software itself is not directly assigned a unique identifier. For example, the identifier is a serial number(s) assigned to or associated with the control processor(s) configured to execute the software. In another example, the identifier is a serial number(s) assigned to a hardware component other than the executing control processor, such as a serial number of a media gateway processor where the control processor resides or a serial number of an IP services interface card in a port network. Alternatively, the identifier can be assigned directly to the actuated computational component itself.
The unique computational component identifier can be one or more numeric, alphabetical, or alphanumeric symbols. The identifier can have any format and have any length. For example, the identifier can be a serial number assigned by a manufacturer, a Medium Access Control or MAC address, and the like.
The backup flag can indicate not only the backup state of a computational component but also the type of backup function provided by the associated computational component. For example, the backup flag can be implemented as multiple flags, such as an SRP flag indicating that the associated component is configured as an SRP, as an LSP flag indicating that the associated component is configured as an LSP, and as a WSP flag indicating that the associated component is configured as a WSP.
The method and system of the present invention can have a number of advantages. First, the present invention can effectively protect and control right to use of one or more redundant computational features, applications, and any other type or form of redundant computational component, without compromising the reliability and availability of the redundant computational component. The present invention therefore permits the sale of spare processors at less cost than the main processor. The use of a license file containing fields for multiple serial numbers can provide a high level of security of copy protection and feature activation. The license file marries the use of software to a specific instance of hardware. In this manner, the ability to create two simplex systems out of a single, redundant system is substantially impeded. Second when the licensing file is used to operate all or part of the network, the present invention provides a safeguard to prevent the spare processor from being used too long as the main processor. The grace period provided to the user is a configurable parameter and is flexible for a variety of applications. Third, the present invention can allow rapid, simple, and convenient generation of licenses for new systems and regeneration of licenses to accommodate repair situations. Fourth, the present invention can eliminate the ability of a service technician, or other authorized or unauthorized personnel, to alter directly the feature mix of a switch. That is, fewer people have the knowledge or access to “give away” software or features. Fifth, customers, dealers, and distributors can activate the primary and backup computational components or features themselves without service personnel involvement. Sixth, the present invention can perform license verification rapidly, automatically and seamlessly for the user. These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the invention(s) contained herein.
The present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/232,906, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,681,245, entitled “REMOTE FEATURE ACTIVATOR FEATURE EXTRACTION” to Walker et al.; 10/232,508, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,698,225, entitled “LICENSE MODES IN CALL PROCESSING” Rhodes et al.; 10/232,507, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,228,567, entitled “LICENSE FILE SERIAL NUMBER TRACKING” to Serkowski et al.; 10/231,999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,707,116, entitled “FLEXIBLE LICENSE FILE FEATURE CONTROLS” to Walker et al.; and 10/231,957, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,216,363, entitled “LICENSING DUPLICATED SYSTEMS” to Serkowski et al., each of which is filed concurrently herewith and is incorporated herein by reference.
The above-described embodiments and configurations are neither complete nor exhaustive. As will be appreciated, other embodiments of the invention are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.
The spare control processor 102 executes telecommunication applications 114a-n (each of which comprises a mode setting agent 124 and a timer 126) via operating system 111 to perform the telecommunication functions and features. Spare processor 102 executes instructions in memory 101, such as license manager 113, activation agent 154, and telecommunication application 114a-n, and communicates with switching network 103 via network (e.g. LAN or WAN) 110. One skilled in the art can readily envision that the spare control processor 102 can communicate with switching network 103 via a direct connection such as a connection via the processor bus of control processor 102.
Operating system 111 is a conventional operating system allowing for the execution of applications such as telecommunication application 114a-n and for the intra-application communication of messages. Telecommunication application can be any application(s) and/or feature(s) used in telecommunication systems, such as DEFINITY™ by Avaya, Inc.
Personal computer (PC) 120 is utilized by service personnel to administer the telecommunication switching system.
Switching (or server) network 103 provides all of the necessary telecommunication switching and interfacing that is required in the telecommunication switching system.
Activation agent 154 monitors, by known techniques, the telecommunications network and determines when to activate the spare processor 102. For an SRP, the activation agent 154 monitors connection 158 and 162 (which is typically a fiber optic cable) to the main telecommunication processor system 150 and, when the connection goes down (causing a loss of network connectivity) and/or if the system 150 fails, the activation agent 154 causes activation of the SRP. For an LSP, the agent 154 causes activation of the LSP when the LSP is contacted by a network node, such as a telephone 106, that is pre-instructed to use the LSP in the event of malfunctions of the main processor system 150. For a WSP, the agent 154 causes activation of the WSP when the main processor system 150 and WSP(s) higher in the heirarchy no longer respond to polling messages from the WSP.
License manager 113 periodically verifies that the spare telecommunication processor system 100 is being operated in accordance with pertinent licensing rules and disables the system 100 or an operational part of the system 100 when licensing rules are violated (or a predetermined licensing event occurs). During initialization of the switch software, during the restoration of translations, and periodically as the switch is running, a query is made by the telecommunication application to the license manager 113. The license manager 113 reads license file 112, compares the serial number(s) in the license file 112 with a serial number in the switch hardware, compares the software name and/or version in the license with the name and/or version of the telecommunication application 114a-n or operational part thereof, and, if a match occurs, delivers permission to run the telecommunication application 114a-n or operational part thereof with the feature mask in the license file. The feature mask controls revenue associated options.
Referring to
In one configuration, the feature mask is configured as a feature mask data format, though any data format can be used. This configuration is discussed in detail in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/231,999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,707,116, entitled “Flexible License File Feature Controls” to Walker et al. The content of the mask controls what features are enabled or may be enabled on the product. There are three types of entries corresponding to fields 248, 252, and 256 in the feature mask.
The first type of entry (or Type I feature) in field 248 relates to those types of features that have a simple on/off state. The feature is either enabled or disabled. Each of these types of entries has two variables associated with it, namely a value and a lock. The value variable can be either on or off and the lock variable either locked or unlocked. Examples of features falling into this category include (in addition to those Type I features identified above in the background) Digital Communication System or DCS call coverage, audible message waiting, vectoring, attendant vectoring, Asynchronous Transfer Mode or ATM, dial by name, echo cancellation, multimedia call handling, multiple call handling, caller identification, multifrequency signaling, Integrated Services Digital Network or ISDN network call redirection, centralized attendant, remote office, enhanced Direct Inward dialing or DID routing, survivable remote processor, time of day routing, tenant partitioning, hospitality announcements, Vector Directory Number or VDN of origin announcement, wideband switching, and wireless.
The second type of entry (or Type II feature) in field 256 relates to those types of features that have a numeric value. The value can correspond to a numeric value and/or name kind of entry. Each of these types of entries has two values associated with it, namely a lower limit value and an upper limit value. The lower limit value is never greater than the upper limit value. Examples of features falling into this category include (in addition to those Type II features identified above in the background) logged-in automated call distribution or ACD agents, maximum currently registered IP stations, maximum administered IP trunks, offer category, maximum number of ports, maximum number of administered remote office trunks, and maximum number of mobile stations.
The third type of entry (or Type III feature) in field 256 relates to those types of features that have a product value (e.g., corresponding to a product name or type), a release number (e.g., referring to a product release identifier), and a numeric value (e.g., indicating an operational parameter associated with the product and/or release, such as how many ports are licensed, and/or how many licenses for the product are granted. This type of feature allows other controlled applications to be executed. Like the second type of entry, each of these types of entries has two values associated with it, namely a lower limit value and an upper limit value. The lower limit value is never greater than the upper limit value. A feature limit in the feature mask is such a capacity value associated with a Type II or III feature.
Referring again to
Modem 108 is directly connected to control processor 102 so that control processor(s) 102 can contact remote feature activation system 109 via public telephone network 104. Similarly, remote feature activation system 109 can establish a communication channel with control processor 102 via public telephone network 104 and modem 108. One skilled in the art can readily envision that modem 108 can be interconnected to control processor(s) 102 via LAN 110.
Each telecommunication application 114a-n can include a corresponding mode setting agent 124a-n to set the licensing mode of the system 100. As discussed in copending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/232,508, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,698,225, entitled “Licensed Modes in Call Processing”, to Rhodes et al., the mode setting agent 124 can set one of three operational modes to the system 100.
In the LICENSE NORMAL mode, the license manager has found that a valid license is properly installed, the license file contains a serial number that matches the serial number of the processor (simplex configuration) or a plurality of serial numbers that match the serial numbers of a similar plurality of processors (multiple processor configuration (e.g., duplex configuration)), the software name and version of the telecommunication application matches that in the license file, the license has not expired, the offer category in the feature mask matches the translation, the feature usage in translation does not exceed limits in the feature mask (e.g., a feature limit is a capacity value associated with a type 2 or type 3 feature), and if the processor is a WSP, SRP, or LSP, the processor is not active.
In the LICENSE ERROR mode, the license manager has found one or more of the following: no valid license is properly installed, the license file contains a serial number that does not match the serial number of the processor (simplex configuration) or a plurality of serial numbers that do not match the serial numbers of a similar plurality of processors (multiple processor configuration (e.g., duplex configuration)), the license has expired, the feature usage exceeds limits (e.g., there are more ports translated than permitted by the port limit in the license file which can occur when translations are copied from another switch or when a new license file is installed that has lower limits than the previous license file) and the processor is a WSP, SRP, or LSP that is active (or has been activated by activation agent 154). As discussed in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/231,999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,707,116, entitled “Flexible License File Feature Controls”, to Walker et al., if there is a mismatch between the existing translation and the license file for a locked first type of entry the feature on/off state is simply updated to match the license and does not cause entry into LICENSE-ERROR mode. The LICENSE-ERROR mode is cleared by correcting the error that caused entry into the mode or by installing a valid license that is consistent with the configuration of the system 100. In the LICENSE-ERROR mode, the telecommunication application is permitted to run for a predetermined period of time or grace period. License error timers 126a-n (
In one configuration, all call processing functions of the telecommunication application are permitted to run during the LICENSE-ERROR MODE. Thus, the customer will realize the same level of service in both the LICENSE-NORMAL and LICENSE-ERROR modes.
In the NO-LICENSE mode, the license manager has found that (i) a corresponding license error timer 126a-n expired and one or more of the following: there is no valid license installed on the system, the feature usage exceeds limits, the license file contains a serial number that does not match the serial number of the processor (simplex configuration) or a plurality of serial numbers that do not match the serial numbers of a similar plurality of processors (multiple processor configuration (e.g., duplex configuration)), the license is expired, and the processor is a WSP, SRP, or LSP that is active; (ii) the name and/or version of the telecommunication application does not match the name and/or version in the license file; and/or (iii) the offer category in the feature mask does not match translation. In the NO-LICENSE mode, all new call originations (except alarm calls (e.g., 911 calls) and calls to an administered emergency number) are denied and all incoming calls (except calls to an administered number) are denied. This mode is cleared by correcting the error that caused entry into the mode or by installing a valid license that is consistent with the configuration of the switch.
The system configuration of
When in standby mode, the spare processor is in LICENSE-NORMAL mode. A spare processor cannot be in LICENSE-NORMAL mode unless it is in the standby mode. License checks in standby/LICENSE-NORMAL mode are necessary because, when a spare processor becomes active, it enters LICENSE-ERROR mode automatically, merely by virtue of the fact that it is active. Without license checks in standby mode, it would be possible for a user to purchase spare processor software once and sell it many times to different customers with no loss of functionality. Moreover, these checks are necessary to ensure that the spare processor is able (from a licensing perspective) to assume control of its preassigned portion of the network. If a license error timer value is zero when the activation agent causes activation of the spare processor, the spare processor enters the NO-LICENSE mode. A spare processor returns to LICENSE-NORMAL mode only when it returns to standby mode, which requires reinitialization. If within a configurable time (typically 30 minutes) after rebooting, the spare processor is activated by the activation agent, the spare processor shall immediately enter LICENSE-ERROR mode. The respective license timer 126a-n for each application is not reset and will retain the value before rebooting as saved in corresponding timer value 125a-n in nonvolatile memory. If the spare processor continues to be active for more than a configurable period of time (typically six days), the license timer 126a-n for each application will expire and the spare processor will enter NO-LICENSE mode.
The operation of the license manager 113 and mode setting agent 124 will now be discussed in more detail with reference to
The request is received by the license manager 113 in step 400 of
In step 416, the manager 113 reads license file 112 to obtain the name and/or version number of telecommunication application 114. For security reasons, the license file is stored in an encrypted form. As will be appreciated, the encryption can be performed using one or more keys. The manager 113 then determines whether or not the name and/or version number for the telecommunication application 114 matches the name and/or version number in the decrypted license file. If not, the manager 113 in step 420 records the error code corresponding to an unmatched name and/or version number.
In step 424, the manager 113 forwards a serial number request to the processor 102 (and duplicated control processor if present). Control processor 102 is assigned a unique electronically readable serial number that is set during board manufacture. If the processor 102 fails to respond to the serial number request after a predetermined time period and/or after a predetermined number of requests, manager 113 assumes that the processor 102 is unavailable. It is typically desired to resend serial number requests in the event that no response is received, as the processor may be resetting (e.g., after a firmware update) at the time of the initial serial number request.
In step 436, the manager 113 determines if the serial number of the active processor could be read and if it matches serial number 212a or 212b (if present) in the license file. If the serial number of the processor could not be read in step 428, or if it does not match any of the serial numbers in the license file, the manager 113 in step 440 records the proper error code for an unmatched serial number.
In step 444, the manager 113 determines whether the duplication flag is set or not. The duplication flag may be configured in any suitable manner, such as a bit having two values, 0 and 1, each of which indicates a different predetermined duplication state. For example, a “0” value indicates no duplication and a “1” value duplication. When the duplication flag is on, the manager 113 proceeds to step 448 and checks whether the duplicated spare control processor serial number could be read in step 424 and if the serial number of the duplicated spare control processor 102b matches either of the serial numbers in the license file. When the duplication flag is on, and the duplicated spare control processor serial number could not be read or it does not match either of the serial numbers in the license file, the manager 113 in step 452 records the proper error code for an unmatched duplicated spare control processor serial number.
In the event that the duplication flag is off or after either of steps 448 or 452, the manager 113 determines in step 456 whether or not the license is expired. When the expiration date in the license file is earlier than the current date and time, the license is considered to be expired. When the license is expired, the manager 113 in step 460 records the proper error code for an expired license.
In step 464, the manager 113 decides whether the license is to be denied or granted. The license is denied when one or more error codes is recorded during the preceding steps. The license is granted when no error codes are recorded.
When the license is granted, the manager 113 generates a license granted response in step 468. The response includes an indication that the license is granted and the feature mask of the license file. The message is encrypted and forwarded to the mode setting agent 124.
When the license is denied, the manager 113 generates a license denied response in step 472. The response includes an indication that the license is denied, the error code(s) corresponding to the reason(s) for license denial, and the feature mask. The feature mask is not returned if the error is “no valid license present” since there is no feature mask to return without a valid license. When the license is denied for more than one reason, error codes for all of the reasons for license denial are included in the license denial response. The message is encrypted and forwarded to the mode setting agent 124.
Referring again to
In step 308, the agent 124 determines whether the manager 113 found a valid license to be present. If a valid license is not present, the agent 124 determines in step 312 whether the current license mode of the system 100 is the NO-LICENSE mode. When the current mode is not the NO-LICENSE mode, the agent sets the mode to the LICENSE-ERROR mode in step 316 (this prevents a system with a valid license from immediately going from LICENSE-NORMAL mode to NO-LICENSE mode if the license file is corrupted or inadvertently deleted). When the current mode is the NO-LICENSE mode, the agent leaves the system in the NO-LICENSE mode in step 320. If a valid license is present, the agent 124 proceeds to step 324.
In step 324, the agent determines whether the manager found that the application name and/or version matched the name and/or version in the license file. If not, the agent proceeds to step 320 in which the mode is set to the NO-LICENSE mode. If so, the agent proceeds to step 328.
In step 328, the agent determines whether the manager found that the offer category matches the translation. If not, the agent proceeds to step 320 in which the mode is set to the NO-LICENSE mode. If so, the agent proceeds to step 332.
In step 332, the agent determines whether the value of the license error timer 124 is greater than zero. The application 114 maintains the license error timer value in memory. When the license timer value is zero, the agent proceeds to step 336 (discussed below), and when the license timer value is greater than zero the agent proceeds to step 340 (also discussed below).
In one configuration, the value of the license error timer is periodically saved in nonvolatile memory of each of the processors so that the timer can be preserved across system resets. To make this possible, the mode setting agent makes not only a license file request but also a timer save request at predetermined intervals. The license timer value passed to the manager 113 for storage is set as follows: (a) if the system 100 is in LICENSE-NORMAL mode, the license timer value shall be the full duration of the grace period, e.g., 6 days, (b) if the system 100 is in LICENSE-ERROR mode, the license timer value saved shall be the time remaining on the corresponding license error timer 126a-n, and (c) if the system 100 is in NO-LICENSE mode, the license timer value saved is zero.
At initialization or any other time that the value is not available in memory, the agent issues a timer request to the license manager 113. To generate a timer response, the manager 113 generally queries nonvolatile memory for the stored timer value 125. In some WSP applications, the manager queries all of the IP services interface cards with which the WSP is in contact. In either event, the lowest of these values (the value closest to expiration) is passed back to the agent in the timer response message. If any of the timer values from the processors are corrupted or if no processor responds with a timer value, the value in the timer response message to the agent is zero (indicating that the timer is expired). The agent uses the timer value in the response to set the timer value in memory.
Returning to
The agent in step 344 next determines if the feature limits defined in the feature mask were being exceeded (e.g. maximum ports in license file set to 1000, but greater than 1000 ports are administered in translation). When the control processor 102 is an SRP, the agent determines whether port boards other than an expansion interface board or maintenance test board is in the port network. When the limits are being exceeded, the agent proceeds to step 316. When the limits are not being exceeded, the agent proceeds to step 348.
In step 348, the agent determines whether the manager found that the license is expired. When the license is expired, the agent proceeds to step 316. When the license is not expired, the agent proceeds to step 352.
The agent next checks in step 352 the WSP, LSP, and SRP flags 260, 268, and 264 to see if the processor is configured as a WSP, LSP, or SRP. As will be appreciated, if the flag is not set the processor is not configured in the manner indicated by the flag. If it is, and the processor is active (i.e., not in standby mode), then the agent sets the license mode to LICENSE-ERROR in step 316. If it is not, the agent proceeds to step 356.
Returning again to step 336, the agent determines whether the manager found one or more unmatched serial numbers. If not, the agent proceeds to step 320 in which the license mode is set to the NO-LICENSE mode. If so, the agent proceeds to step 360.
If in either of steps 360 and 366, if the agent determines that the feature limits to be exceeded or the license to be expired, respectively, the agent proceeds to step 320.
If in both of steps 360 and 366, the agent determines that the feature limits are within licensed limits and the license is unexpired, respectively, the agent proceeds to step 370.
In step 370, the agent determines whether the processor is an active WSP, LSP, or SRP. If so, the agent proceeds to step 320. If not, the agent proceeds to step 356.
As shown by steps 336, 360, 366, and 370, the timer value is relevant only if there is a license error. If there are no errors, the switch goes to LICENSE-NORMAL mode, even if the license error timer is expired. If this were not the case, there would be no way to get out of the NO-LICENSE mode once the timer had expired.
Whenever the system 100 enters the LICENSE-NORMAL mode, the agent clears any LICENSE-ERROR or NO-LICENSE alarms, stops the license error timer (if running) and resets the timer to the full duration of the grace period, and makes a timer save request of this duration to the license manager.
Whenever the system 100 enters the LICENSE-ERROR mode, the agent generates a major (license-error) alarm, logs the error into the system security log, and initiates the license error countdown timer.
Whenever the system 100 enters NO-LICENSE mode, the agent generates a major (no-license) alarm (that is different from the alarm generated by the agent on entry into the LICENSE-ERROR mode), logs the error into the system security log, and provides a timer save request of zero hours to the license manager.
When the system 100 is operating in the NO-LICENSE or LICENSE-ERROR mode, the alarm is presented to the user in a suitable mode or modes. For example, a suitable error message can be displayed on the initial login screen for the system and/or a key or other indicator can be illuminated on one or more telephone sets and/or on another part of the system hardware. The agent can also provide an alarm notification to outside service personnel.
In step 508, the license manager performs a series of checks to determine if the license file is valid. The license manager confirms that the serial number contained in the license file matches the serial number of the spare processor, that the license has not expired, that the version contained in the license file matches the software version loaded onto the processor system 100, that the offer category contained in the license file matches the offer category contained in the translation files of the system 100, data integrity using a checksum or other suitable approach, and that the license file length and format are correct.
If one or more of the preceding queries is not confirmed, the license manager proceeds to step 524 and displays a suitable error message to the user and terminates operation in step 528.
If each of the queries is confirmed, the new license file is stored in translation in step 512. The new license file overwrites the license file already in memory.
The application then processes the new license file feature mask in step 516. The application activates and deactivates features and sets new limits in accordance with the new license file feature mask.
Next in step 520, the application sets the license mode as defined above and illustrated in
A number of variations and modifications of the invention can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the invention without providing others.
For example in one alternative embodiment, the division of the various functions performed by the license manager, activation agent, timer, and mode setting agent modules are different. For example, the license manager can perform all or part of the licensing-related functions of the mode setting agent or the mode setting agent can perform all or part of the licensing-related functions of the license manager.
In another alternative embodiment, the mode setting agent 124 is not a part of the telecommunication application 114.
In yet another alternative embodiment, the license manager, activation agent, timer, and/or mode setting agent 124 are implemented as software and/or hardware, such as a logic circuit, e.g., an application specific integrated circuit.
In yet another alternative embodiment, any other applications running on the telecommunication processor system 100 can utilize the same mechanism as the mode setting agent 124 to determine if they are to be allowed to execute and what options they execute.
In yet a further alternative embodiment, the above techniques are applied with other telecommunication and/or non-telecommunication computational architectures having duplicated computational components. The computational components can be hardware, software, or a combination of the two.
In yet a further alternative embodiment, the license file can include fields for any number of unique identifiers for the same or differing types of hardware components. For example, for a license verification to be successful the license manager could require that there be matches for serial numbers not only of a control processor but also of an application specific integrated circuit or another type of hardware component.
In yet another embodiment, unsuccessful license verification causes only the contacting telecommunication application and not other successfully validated telecommunication applications or other parts of the system to be set to a mode other than the LICENSE NORMAL mode.
In yet another embodiment, when in LICENSE-NORMAL mode, if the mode setting agent does not receive a license response from a license manager within a predetermined time period of issuing a license request, the agent automatically enters the LICENSE-ERROR mode. When in the LICENSE-ERROR mode for reason other than failure to receive a license response, or at system initialization, if the agent does not receive a license response from the license manager within the predetermined period of issuing the license request, the system 100 shall enter NO-LICENSE mode.
In yet another embodiment, a separate timer 126a-n is not contained in each application but a common timer is used in the processor system 100 or an adjunct connected to the system 100.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention is used to enable/disable one or more applications executed by a server in addition to or in lieu of a switch. This embodiment is particularly useful in monitoring licensing in multi-mode contact centers which receive a broad variety of contact types, such as telephone calls, electronic mail, and contacts via a Web browser.
The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. Although the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g. as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4288659 | Atalla | Sep 1981 | A |
4405829 | Rivest et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4780821 | Crossley | Oct 1988 | A |
4811393 | Hazard | Mar 1989 | A |
4888800 | Marshall et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4937863 | Robert et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5005122 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5023907 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5157663 | Major et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5179591 | Hardy et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5204897 | Wyman | Apr 1993 | A |
5206903 | Kohler et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5230020 | Hardy et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5260999 | Wyman | Nov 1993 | A |
5307481 | Shimazaki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5329570 | Glassmacher et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341427 | Hardy et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347580 | Molva et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5386369 | Christiano | Jan 1995 | A |
5390297 | Barber et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5408649 | Beshears et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5448639 | Arazi | Sep 1995 | A |
5553143 | Ross et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563946 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579222 | Bains et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5629980 | Stefik et al. | May 1997 | A |
5646992 | Subler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5671412 | Christiano | Sep 1997 | A |
5673315 | Wolf | Sep 1997 | A |
5699431 | Van Oorschot et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708709 | Rose | Jan 1998 | A |
5717604 | Wiggins | Feb 1998 | A |
5724428 | Rivest | Mar 1998 | A |
5742757 | Hamadani et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745569 | Moskowitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745576 | Abraham et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745879 | Wyman | Apr 1998 | A |
5754761 | Willsey | May 1998 | A |
5758068 | Brandt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758069 | Olsen | May 1998 | A |
5790074 | Rangedahl et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790664 | Coley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796941 | Lita | Aug 1998 | A |
5828747 | Fisher et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835600 | Rivest | Nov 1998 | A |
5864620 | Pettitt | Jan 1999 | A |
5905793 | Flockhart et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905860 | Olsen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5935243 | Hasebe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940504 | Griswold | Aug 1999 | A |
5956505 | Manduley | Sep 1999 | A |
5956716 | Kenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960085 | de la Huerga | Sep 1999 | A |
5978565 | Ohran et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982873 | Flockhart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995625 | Sudia et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006016 | Faigon et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009401 | Horstmann | Dec 1999 | A |
6011973 | Valentine et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023763 | Grumstrup et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023766 | Yamamura | Feb 2000 | A |
6047242 | Benson | Apr 2000 | A |
6067621 | Yu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128389 | Chan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134660 | Boneh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148415 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163607 | Bogart et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173053 | Bogart et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178511 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189146 | Misra et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192122 | Flockhart et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212635 | Reardon | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219652 | Carter et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223291 | Puhl et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246871 | Ala-Laurila | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6314565 | Kenner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343280 | Clark | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6360320 | Ishiguro et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381747 | Wonfor et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414595 | Scrandis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421726 | Kenner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442708 | Dierauer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463534 | Geiger et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6502079 | Ball et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513117 | Tarpenning et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6513121 | Serkowski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539481 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557105 | Tardo et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574612 | Baratti et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584454 | Hummel et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6615347 | de Silva et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640305 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6654888 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675208 | Rai et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697945 | Ishiguro et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704885 | Salas-Meza et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6760324 | Scott et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765492 | Harris | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769063 | Kanda et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772133 | Kambayashi et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775782 | Buros et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778820 | Tendler | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785726 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795941 | Nickels | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816842 | Singh et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826606 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6842896 | Redding et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850958 | Wakabayashi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854010 | Christian et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868403 | Wiser et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876984 | Tadayon et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883095 | Sandu et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889212 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901386 | Dedrick et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904523 | Bialick et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920567 | Doherty et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6928166 | Yoshizawa | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928558 | Allahwerdi et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934463 | Ishiguro et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934848 | King et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941283 | Kambayashi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957344 | Goldshlag et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959291 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961858 | Fransdonk | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968384 | Redding et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973444 | Blinn et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976164 | King et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981222 | Rush et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7032113 | Pendlebury | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035918 | Redding et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7065214 | Ishiguro et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069468 | Olson et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073063 | Peinado | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085382 | Terao et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096469 | Kubala et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100044 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7124304 | Bel et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146340 | Musson | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7149806 | Perkins et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152245 | Dublish et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171662 | Misra et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7185195 | Hug et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7206936 | Aull et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225333 | Peinado et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228426 | Sinha et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7302703 | Burns | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308717 | Koved et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310734 | Boate et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313828 | Holopainen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7318236 | DeMello et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336791 | Ishiguro | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7353388 | Gilman | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356692 | Bialick et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7382881 | Uusitalo et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7383205 | Peinado et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7415729 | Ukeda et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7545931 | Dillaway | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7549172 | Tokutani et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552166 | Chack | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7716348 | Redding et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7747851 | Robinson | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7814023 | Rao | Oct 2010 | B1 |
20010001268 | Menon et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010013024 | Takahashi | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034846 | Beery | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020001302 | Pickett | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010681 | Hillegass et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013722 | Kanaga | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020017977 | Wall | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020038422 | Suwamoto et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052939 | Lee | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083003 | Halliday | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087892 | Hideyo | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107809 | Biddle et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112186 | Ford et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116340 | Hellberg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020125886 | Bates et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138441 | Lopatic | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154777 | Candelore | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164025 | Raiz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169625 | Yang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169725 | Eng | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174356 | Padole et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188656 | Patton et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188704 | Gold | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194473 | Pope et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005427 | Herrero | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013411 | Uchiyama | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018491 | Nakahara et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018582 | Yaacovi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023564 | Padhye et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055749 | Carmody et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095542 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030144959 | Makita | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149670 | Cronce | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030149874 | Balfanz et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156719 | Cronce | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159033 | Ishiguro | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159070 | Mayer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163428 | Schneck et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172035 | Cronce et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177393 | Ishiguro | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191936 | Kawatsura et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208449 | Diao | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233547 | Gaston et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003269 | Waxman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010440 | Lenard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010469 | Lenard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010471 | Lenard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039916 | Aldis et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047354 | Slater et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073517 | Zunke et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078339 | Goringe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088541 | Messerges et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103011 | Hatano et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103324 | Band | May 2004 | A1 |
20040127196 | Dabbish et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128395 | Miyazaki | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128551 | Walker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133794 | Kocher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162998 | Tuomi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166878 | Erskine et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172367 | Chavez | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181695 | Walker | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181696 | Walker | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199760 | Mazza et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249763 | Vardi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260589 | Varadarajan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268120 | Mirtal et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005098 | Michaelis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038753 | Yen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050076204 | Thornton et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086174 | Eng | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091507 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050144437 | Ransom et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154877 | Trench | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198510 | Robert et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202830 | Sudit | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229004 | Callaghan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246098 | Bergstrom et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289072 | Sabharwal | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021068 | Xu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026105 | Endoh | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036554 | Schrock et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036894 | Bauer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064582 | Teal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089912 | Spagna et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060178953 | Aggarwal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190409 | Hillegass et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242083 | Chavez | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060294010 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033419 | Kocher et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070094710 | Walker et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107067 | Fountian | May 2007 | A1 |
20070219917 | Liu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080052295 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082449 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080141242 | Shapiro | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189131 | Chavez | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100049725 | Walker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 071 253 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1562378 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2006085481 | Mar 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040044630 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |