The present invention relates to solar sensors for that respond to the position of the sun, and in particular solar sensors used for adjustment of climate controls of a vehicle.
Generally, photodiodes have a cosine angular response, meaning that the peak response of the photodiode is achieved at a normal angle of incidence where light is impinging perpendicular to the surface. This response gradually decreases according to the cosine function to a zero output at 90°.
This cosine response is a drawback in some types of solar sensors. In some vehicles, a solar sensor is used to measure solar heating by sunlight. The sensor represents a sampling of the heating affect occurring on some object, such as a vehicle. However, the solar heating affect only follows the cosine response for objects that are flat. Thus, the use of photodiodes is sometimes limited to modeling the heating of flat objects.
However, many practical solar sensor applications, including especially those with a passenger compartment of a vehicle, are helped by sensors whose response corresponds to such complex three-dimensional shapes.
One of the design goals of automotive solar sensors is to respond to sunlight in a fashion that is consistent with the heating affects on the passenger compartment. In general terms, the desired overhead response is about 50% of the peak response, due to the shading effects of the roof. The peak response typically occurs at about 50° from overhead. The response at the horizon is generally desired to be about 50 to 70% of the peak response, due to the relatively large area of glass exposed in that angular region.
Some automotive solar sensors use a domed diffuser to provide increased response when the sun is near the horizon. The thicker top section reduces the overhead response inherent in the photodiode's cosine-related angular response. One difficulty with this approach is the significant reduction in overall signal current due to the loss of light through the diffuser material. In some solar sensors, the use of a diffuser provides lower signal output for a given size diode, requires a larger diode to achieve a given signal output level, may require additional signal amplification for proper signal processing, and may be characterized with a decreased signal to noise ratio due to the attenuated signal.
What is needed are apparatus and methods which overcome the problems in other solar sensors. The present invention does this in a novel and unobvious manner.
One embodiment of the present invention is a unique method to adjust the response characteristics of a solar sensor by combining both solar radiation blocking features and solar radiation reflecting features. Other embodiments include unique apparatus and systems for modifying the response characteristics of a solar sensor.
A further embodiment of the present invention pertains to an apparatus whose output corresponds to the angular position of a source of radiation, such as the sun. For some angular positions of the source, one or more opaque regions or opaque bodies block a portion of the radiation from falling incident upon a photosensitive electronic device. In yet other positions of the radiation source, a portion of the radiation that would otherwise have missed the photosensitive electronic device is instead reflected onto the device.
In yet other embodiments of the present invention, an apparatus for responding to the angular position of a radiation source includes one or more reflective surfaces. Preferably the reflective surfaces are curved. The curved shapes can be spherical, parabolic, and conical. Some embodiments of the present invention do not include blocking elements.
Further objects, embodiments, forms, benefits, aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention can be obtained from the description, drawings, and claims provided herein.
While the present invention may be embodied in many different forms for the purpose of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any alterations and further modifications in the described embodiments, and any further applications of the principles of the invention as described herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
This application incorporates by reference the following U.S. patent applications: Ser. No. 220,021, filed Jul. 15, 1988, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 4,933,550; Ser. No. 08/653,818, filed May 28, 1996, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,670,774; Ser. No. 09/188,824, filed Nov. 9, 1998, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,084,228; Ser. No. 09/554,297, filed May 11, 2000, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,297,740; Ser. No. 09/269,701, filed May 31, 1999, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,243,002; and Ser. No. 09/508,789, filed Mar. 16, 2000, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,396,040.
The present invention relates to a solar sensor which provides a signal that corresponds to the angular position and intensity of a source of radiation, such as the sun. In one embodiment, the sensor is part of a system for controlling the climate within a vehicle.
Previous systems for controlling the climate within a vehicle tended to use sensors with limited responses. The sensor would provide a signal output that corresponded to the relative placement between the sensor and the sun, such as along fore and aft, and right and left directions. The output of the sensor would change in a manner corresponding to the radiation from the sun striking a two-dimensional planform.
Other solar sensors lack the methods and structures for modeling the vertical attributes of the passenger compartment of a vehicle. For example, the roof of a vehicle is spaced several feet above the front hood or trunk compartment body sections. Therefore, when the sun is relatively close to the horizon, the front, side, and rear glass of the vehicle compartment allow significant amounts of solar radiation to enter the vehicle compartment. If a solar sensor improperly models the vehicle compartment, this heating affect at low solar angles is not approximated.
In contrast, a solar sensor according to one embodiment of the present invention includes a reflective surface and provides a better approximation of the vehicle compartment. The shape of this reflective surface is adapted and configured such that when the sun is at low angles above the horizon, radiation from the sun which would otherwise not fall incident on the photo-sensitive electronic device is instead reflected off of the reflecting surface and onto the active surface of the photo-sensitive electronic device. In some embodiments, the solar sensor does not include a diffuser. By not including a diffuser, these embodiments provide higher signal levels for a given size photodiode. In other embodiments, a smaller photodiode can be used to achieve a given output signal, thus reducing the sensor cost. Further, subsequent signal amplification can be reduced owing to the increased photocurrent levels. Because the signal levels are higher, the signal to noise ratio is improved.
In one embodiment of the present invention, an approach is developed that uses a shaped blocking element and a curved reflector to transform the inherent cosine angular response of a photodiode into a response more representative of a three-dimensional vehicle compartment. In some embodiments of the present invention, the output response of the photodiode is changed for some angular ranges of the incoming solar radiation relative to the normal cosine response. For other angular ranges of solar radiation the response is decreased relative to the normal cosine response.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the response of the sensor to overhead radiation is attenuated by placing a substantially opaque portion of a body above the photosensitive electronic device. Yet other embodiments of the present invention include a sensor with increased response when the solar radiation approaches the sensor from angles closer to the horizon. In such embodiments, a reflecting element is placed above the photosensitive electronic device such that incoming light is reflected off of the reflecting surface and onto the active, planar surface of the electronic device.
In some embodiments, the reflecting surface is generally above the electronic device. In yet other embodiments, the electronic device is in-between the source of radiation and the reflecting element, such as the case where the reflecting surface is located aft of the electronic device. Solar radiation entering the sensor housing at near horizontal angles passes over the electronic device, strikes the reflecting surface aft of the device, and is reflected forward and downward onto the active surface of the electronic device. In yet other embodiments, the detector is placed over the reflector, with the detector thus functioning as a blocking element. In yet other embodiments, the detector is placed to the side of the reflector or off to the side, at a downward-facing angle.
As another example, electronic device 22 can be a single photocell or an array of photocells. In some embodiments of the present invention, the electronic device 22 includes one or more active elements arranged on a generally flat, planar surface. However, the invention is not so limited, and contemplates nonplanar arrangements of photosensitive electronic devices.
Although the term “solar radiation” is used herein, various embodiments of the present invention pertain to sensors which can sense the orientation of a radiation source other than the sun. Further, it is understood that the photosensitive electronic device of the present invention can be sensitive to one or more portions of the spectrum of solar radiation, and may not be sensitive to some portions of the solar radiation spectrum at all. The sensor's overall spectral response is the combination of the spectral response of the photosensitive electronic device and the spectral transmission of the housing. Two examples of spectral responses are “eye-like response” and “near-infrared response.” In some embodiments, the housing is tinted to provide a predetermined spectral response.
Housing 30 of apparatus 20 is preferably a dome-shaped, generally transparent cover for protection of electronic device 22. In other embodiments, housing 30 is flat or has a complex curved profile. In some embodiments, housing 30 can include cosmetic texturing to provide some scattering or reorientation of solar energy that is incident upon outer surface 32 as it travels through the thickness of the housing wall and exits interior surface 34. However, the invention is not so limited, and housing 30 can have little, if any, diffusive properties. In a preferred embodiment, housing 30 does not have any diffusive properties. Housing 30 as shown in
Housing 30 preferably includes a blocking and reflecting element such as a body 40 which depends downwardly from interior surface 34 toward electronic device 22. In other embodiments, the blocking and reflecting element is accomplished as a coating applied housing 30. In one embodiment body 40 is generally hemispherical and includes a reflecting surface 42 on a convex portion of the body. Further, body 40 preferably includes a surface which is at least partly opaque. Referring to
Although what has been shown and described is an opaque portion of body 40 which casts shadow 50 onto device 22, the present invention is not so limited. The opaque portion of apparatus 20 can be a portion of housing 30, including portions on the outer surface 32 or inner surface 34, or embedded within the wall of housing 30. Further, the opaque portion of apparatus 20 can be of a different size and/or shape than body 40. For example, as seen in
The size of the projected area of the blocking element helps determine the response of electronic device 22 to an overhead radiation source. For example, a blocking element that is relatively small provides a relatively large response from electronic device 22 to a source 10 that is located above both the blocking element and the electronic device.
Referring to
In yet other embodiments of the present invention, a reflective coating 48 can be placed along an interior wall 34 of housing 30. Radiation from source 10 would pass over device 22, and reflect forward off of reflective surface 48 onto device 22. In some embodiments, the presence of reflecting surface 48 may be at least partly opaque for radiation received from the rear of apparatus 20. However, this may be acceptable in those embodiments in which apparatus 20 approximates a vehicular compartment with a relatively small rear window.
Referring to
In one embodiment of the present invention, the range of angles from the overhead position (
In some embodiments of the present invention, the first and second angular ranges overlap. That is, there are certain angular positions of the source of radiation for which there is a shadow cast on the electronic device, and also a portion of the radiation is reflected onto the electronic device. In yet other embodiments of the present invention, the first and second angular ranges are mutually exclusive. That is, the shadow cast by the opaque portion of the body falls off of the active area of the electronic device before any radiation is reflected off of the reflecting surface and onto the active area of the electronic device. Whether the first and second angular ranges are overlapping or exclusive can be chosen by selecting the size, shape and location of the opaque portion of apparatus 20 and the size, shape and location of the reflecting portion of apparatus 20.
Although what has been shown and described is an apparatus including a body 20 that provides both blocking and reflection of incident radiation, the present invention is not so limited. Blocking of incident radiation can be created by one or more coatings or localized surface treatments on housing 30. Likewise, reflection of radiation onto the electronic device can be accomplished by one or more reflective coatings and/or reflective bodies attached to apparatus 20.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected. It should be understood that while the use of the word preferable, preferably or preferred in the description above indicates that the feature so described may be more desirable, it nonetheless may not be necessary and embodiments lacking the same may be contemplated as within the scope of the invention, that scope being defined by the claims that follow.
The present application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/738,726, filed Dec. 17, 2003, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/466,815, filed Apr. 30, 2003, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2402662 | Ohl | Jun 1946 | A |
2423278 | Willis, Jr. | Jul 1947 | A |
2827594 | Rabinow | Mar 1958 | A |
2944188 | Lohr et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
3018313 | Gattone | Jan 1962 | A |
3064131 | Brown | Nov 1962 | A |
3293440 | Mueller | Dec 1966 | A |
3539883 | Harrison | Nov 1970 | A |
3614775 | Brean | Oct 1971 | A |
3836773 | Burke et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3843267 | Vital et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3925244 | Nagasawa et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4045769 | Faller | Aug 1977 | A |
4131540 | Husome et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4223174 | Moeller | Sep 1980 | A |
4239962 | Oehler | Dec 1980 | A |
4249160 | Chilvers | Feb 1981 | A |
4320288 | Schlarlack | Mar 1982 | A |
4332973 | Sater | Jun 1982 | A |
4358186 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4370974 | Maxey | Feb 1983 | A |
4477172 | Yokota | Oct 1984 | A |
4509502 | Youcha | Apr 1985 | A |
4568826 | Pitel et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4613791 | Kurihara et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4629941 | Ellis et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4632542 | Whiteside | Dec 1986 | A |
4634223 | Ishii | Jan 1987 | A |
4645975 | Meitzler et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4665321 | Chang et al. | May 1987 | A |
4701611 | Kissinger | Oct 1987 | A |
4709145 | Spillman, Jr. | Nov 1987 | A |
4713533 | Bremer et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4728861 | Kurihara et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4760772 | Horiguchi et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4850692 | Hirao et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4863224 | Afian et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4870264 | Beha | Sep 1989 | A |
4874938 | Chuang | Oct 1989 | A |
4896031 | Pettersson et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4933550 | Hegyi | Jun 1990 | A |
4937443 | Smoot | Jun 1990 | A |
4982081 | Schmidt | Jan 1991 | A |
5020424 | Iida et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5029276 | Buehler et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036437 | Macks | Jul 1991 | A |
5064274 | Alten | Nov 1991 | A |
5065015 | Horiguchi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5072106 | Osawa | Dec 1991 | A |
5117099 | Schmidt | May 1992 | A |
5117744 | Zimmer et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5162643 | Currie | Nov 1992 | A |
5181654 | Yoshimi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5182502 | Slotkowski et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5186682 | Iida | Feb 1993 | A |
5193894 | Lietar et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5216248 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228772 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5234049 | Palazzetti et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5235178 | Hegyi | Aug 1993 | A |
5264691 | Hegyi | Nov 1993 | A |
5302815 | Eggenschwiler | Apr 1994 | A |
5331251 | Marois | Jul 1994 | A |
5337802 | Kajino et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349267 | Brassier et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351151 | Levy | Sep 1994 | A |
5352886 | Kane | Oct 1994 | A |
5416318 | Hegyi | May 1995 | A |
5426294 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434407 | Bauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5444234 | Hennerici et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451822 | Bechtel et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5453662 | Gottlieb | Sep 1995 | A |
5469340 | Heizmann | Nov 1995 | A |
5473515 | Liu | Dec 1995 | A |
5483060 | Sugiura et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483107 | Xander | Jan 1996 | A |
5499168 | Cochard et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5510983 | Iino | Apr 1996 | A |
5517017 | Yamada et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517020 | Lamo | May 1996 | A |
5518176 | Turner et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523557 | Bruno | Jun 1996 | A |
5530240 | Larson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537003 | Bechtel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5550677 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555136 | Waldmann et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562336 | Gotou | Oct 1996 | A |
5592146 | Kover, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602384 | Nunogaki et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617112 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625182 | Guenter | Apr 1997 | A |
5629941 | Kawanishi et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633710 | Kumra et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645338 | Kobayashi | Jul 1997 | A |
5648873 | Jaster et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650608 | Redford et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655832 | Pelka et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660454 | Mori et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670774 | Hill | Sep 1997 | A |
5676453 | Parkyn, Jr. et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680033 | Cha | Oct 1997 | A |
5705804 | Ramer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709145 | Shih | Jan 1998 | A |
5715093 | Schierbeek et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726441 | Samukawa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5773819 | Ramer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783819 | Shimoyama et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796094 | Schofield et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802784 | Federmann | Sep 1998 | A |
5812321 | Schierbeek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5834765 | Ashdown | Nov 1998 | A |
5835613 | Breed et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837994 | Stam et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837995 | Chow et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845000 | Breed et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5877490 | Ramer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5877849 | Ramer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5877897 | Schofield et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886351 | Ramer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5957375 | West | Sep 1999 | A |
5965986 | Borho et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5998929 | Bechtel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6034406 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066850 | Hersom et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084228 | Hill et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087650 | Dage | Jul 2000 | A |
6096375 | Ouderkirk et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097023 | Schofield et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102546 | Carter | Aug 2000 | A |
6130421 | Bechtel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6243002 | Hill et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6297740 | Hill et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6396040 | Hill | May 2002 | B1 |
6417500 | Wood | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6521882 | Sumiya et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6888120 | Chiasson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
20040188593 | Mullins et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
38 21 743 | Nov 1990 | DE |
40 41 769 | Jul 1992 | DE |
40 41 770 | Jul 1992 | DE |
42 06 142 | Feb 1993 | DE |
39 22 153 | Aug 1993 | DE |
42 15 940 | Nov 1993 | DE |
43 02 442 | Apr 1994 | DE |
43 05 446 | Aug 1994 | DE |
43 29 983 | Mar 1995 | DE |
195 23 262 | Jan 1997 | DE |
100 16 419 | Feb 2002 | DE |
0 776 777 | Apr 1997 | EP |
2 736 016 | Jun 1996 | FR |
3 65422 | Mar 1991 | JP |
5 193337 | Aug 1993 | JP |
WO 0140842 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060208153 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60466815 | Apr 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10738726 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11419352 | US |