Solder alloy, solder and method for producing same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10766103
  • Patent Number
    10,766,103
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 4, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 8, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
The present invention discloses a solder alloy, solder and a method for producing the same, and belongs to the field of solder. The solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %. After the solder formed by the solder alloy of the present invention is subjected to multiple reflows and tested by a ball shear test, the residual tin in the solder joint could reach at least 95%, which meets the ball shear standards required by AEC-Q100.
Description

The present application claims priority to China's Taiwan Patent Application No. 107104271, filed with Taiwan Province of China on Feb. 7, 2018, and entitled “Solder alloy and Solder Ball”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to the field of solder, and in particular, to a solder alloy, solder and a method for producing same.


BACKGROUND

In recent years, with the improvement of environmental awareness, lead-free solder has been widely used in different fields. An Sn—Ag—Cu (SAC) alloy is the most commonly used alloy for producing lead-free solder. In addition, there are other two types of alloy compositions at present. One is an Sn—Ag—Cu—Ni (SACN) alloy formed by adding nickel (Ni) into the SAC alloy. When the SACN alloy is formed into solder, the addition of Ni element could suppress copper element consumption of a copper pad and slow down the fast growth of intermetallic compounds (IMC). The other is an Sn—Ag—Cu—Ni—Bi (SACNB) alloy formed by adding nickel (Ni) and bismuth (Bi) into the SAC alloy. When the SACNB alloy is formed into solder, mechanical properties such as excellent and better hardness, yield strength and tensile strength could be achieved, and in a dense and precise packaging process, solder joints of the solder also have better performance in a thermal cycling test (TCT).


In general, after the solder formed by the above SACN and SACNB alloys is subjected to reflows for multiple times and tested by a solder ball shear test according to the automotive specification of AEC-Q100, when the ball shear speed is above 400 μm/s, the interface strength of the solder joints is often reduced due to the multiple reflows of the solder joints, and thus brittle fracture of an intermetallic compound layer is likely to occur, or failure tends to happen in the process of thermal cycling test at level 1 (−50 □ to +150 □, 1000 cycles), which results in that the soldering strength could not reach the standards required by AEC-Q100.


SUMMARY

In the present disclosure, firstly, rhodium metal is considered to be added into an SAC alloy to improve the physical properties of the alloy, so that when such alloy is used to form solder, after being subjected to reflows for multiple times, the solder joints formed by the solder could still meet the standards required by AEC-Q100.


In one aspect, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide a solder alloy which contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, the content of the rhodium is 0.03-0.075 wt %.


Optionally, the content of the copper is 0.3-0.7 wt %.


Optionally, the content of the copper is 0.4-0.6 wt %.


Optionally, the solder alloy further contains 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, the content of the nickel is 0.045-0.055 wt %.


Optionally, the solder alloy further contains 2-4 wt % of bismuth, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, the content of the bismuth is 2.9-3.1 wt %.


Optionally, the solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, the solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.4-0.6 wt % of copper, 0.03-0.075 wt % of rhodium, 0.045-0.055 wt % of nickel, 2.9-3.1 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


In another aspect, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide solder which is formed by any one of the above solder alloys.


Optionally, the solder alloy further contains 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, the solder alloy further contains 2-4 wt % of bismuth based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, the solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, the solder is a solder ball and the diameter of the solder ball is 0.05-1 mm.


In yet another aspect, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide a method for producing solder. The method for producing solder includes: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin, and optional nickel and bismuth according to the mass percentage of each component in any one of the above solder alloys, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.


Optionally, the method for producing solder includes the following steps when the solder alloy further contains 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin and nickel, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.


Optionally, the method for producing solder includes the following steps when the solder alloy further contains 2-4 wt % of bismuth based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin and bismuth, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.


Optionally, the method for producing solder includes the following steps when the solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin, nickel and bismuth, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

To describe the technical solutions in the examples of the present disclosure more clearly, brief introduction will be made to the accompanying drawings required for illustrating the examples. Apparently, the accompanying drawings as described in the following show merely some embodiments of the present disclosure, and a person of ordinary skill in the art may still obtain other drawings from these accompanying drawings without creative efforts.



FIG. 1 is a graph showing the profile of the differential thermal analysis of examples 1-3 and comparative examples 1-3;



FIG. 2 is a graph showing the profile of the differential thermal analysis of examples 4-6 and comparative examples 4-6;



FIG. 3 is a graph showing the profile of the differential thermal analysis of examples 7-9 and comparative examples 7-9;



FIG. 4 is a graph showing the profile of the differential thermal analysis of examples 11, 13 and 14 and comparative examples 10-12;



FIG. 5 is a graph showing the profile of the differential thermal analysis of examples 16, 18 and 19 and comparative examples 13-15;



FIG. 6 is a graph showing the profile of the differential thermal analysis of examples 20-24 and comparative examples 16-18;



FIG. 7 is a graph showing the profile of the differential thermal analysis of examples 26, 28 and 29 and comparative examples 19-21;



FIG. 8 is a reflow curve graph selected for use in the step of solder ball shear test;



FIG. 9 is a photo of a fracture surface at Mode 1;



FIG. 10 is a photo of a fracture surface at Mode 2;



FIG. 11 is a photo of a fracture surface at Mode 3;



FIG. 12 is a photo of a fracture surface at Mode 4;



FIG. 13 is a photo of a fracture surface at Mode 5;



FIG. 14 is a regression line diagram of thermal cycling tests of examples 30-32 and comparative examples 22-24;



FIG. 15 is a regression line diagram of thermal cycling tests of examples 33-35 and comparative examples 25-27; and



FIG. 16 is a regression line diagram of thermal cycling tests of examples 36-38 and comparative examples 28-30.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Unless otherwise specified, all the technical terms used in embodiments of the present disclosure have the same meaning as that commonly understood by a person skilled in the art. In order to make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the present disclosure clearer, the embodiments of the present disclosure are described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. The present disclosure is further illustrated by the following embodiments, but it should be understood that these embodiments are only intended to illustrate the present disclosure and should not be interpreted as limitations to the implementation of the present disclosure.


On the one hand, the embodiments of the present disclosure disclose a solder alloy which contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Since the solder alloy provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure contains 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, solder joints formed by solder made from such solder alloy provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure would maintain excellent or better performance in a thermal cycling test, also have a higher qualified rate when tested by a ball shear test specified in the automotive specification of AEC-Q100, and could meet the requirement of having 95% of residual tin.


With respect to the above functions and effects, to be more specific, since the solder alloy provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure contains 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, due to the addition of element rhodium, the physical properties of the solder alloy of the present disclosure are changed in comparison with an SAC alloy, an SACN alloy or an SACNB alloy. Furthermore, when this solder alloy is used to form solder, the qualified rate of the solder joints formed by the solder is increased when tested by the ball shear test specified in the automotive specification of AEC-Q10. Moreover, the solder joint could also pass a thermal cycling test specified by the standard of AEC-Q100. However, when the rhodium content is lower than 0.02 wt % or higher than 0.085 wt %, the ability of the solder joint formed from the solder made of the solder alloy to withstand the numbers of thermal cycles could not be improved as expected. At the same time, the cost would also be highly increased due to the high content of rhodium.


It should be noted that, the solder alloy of the present disclosure may further contain impurities, but the impurities are present in a conventional content in the solder alloy. The symbol “wt %” represents mass percentage.


The content of the silver may be 0.9 wt %, 1 wt %, 1.3 wt %, 1.5 wt %, 1.7 wt %, 1.9 wt %, 2 wt %, 2.2 wt %, 2.5 wt %, 2.7 wt %, 2.9 wt %, 3 wt %, 3.2 wt %, 3.5 wt %, 3.7 wt %, 3.9 wt %, 4 wt %, 4.1 wt % or the like. The content of the copper may be 0.3 wt %, 0.4 wt %, 0.5 wt %, 0.6 wt %, 0.7 wt %, 0.8 wt %, 0.9 wt %, 1 wt % or the like. The content of the rhodium may be 0.02 wt %, 0.03 wt %, 0.04 wt %, 0.05 wt %, 0.06 wt %, 0.07 wt %, 0.08 wt %, 0.085 wt % or the like.


In the solder alloy, the content of the copper is 0.3-1 wt %. It should be particularly noted that, when the copper content is lower than 0.3 wt %, the mechanical strength of the solder alloy would be bad, which could not meet the requirements of the industry for reliability of solder. Further, when the copper content is higher than 1 wt %, a solder ball formed by the solder alloy exhibits poor flowability in a molten state after reflow, which would cause the problem that the wetting ability is reduced. Preferably, the content of copper is ranging from 0.3 to 0.7 wt %. More preferably, the content of copper is 0.4-0.6 wt %.


Preferably, the content of the rhodium is 0.03-0.075 wt %.


Preferably, the solder alloy provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure further contains 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %. More preferably, the content of the nickel is 0.045-0.055 wt %.


The content of the nickel may be 0.04 wt %, 0.045 wt %, 0.05 wt %, 0.055 wt %, 0.06 wt % or the like.


Preferably, the solder alloy provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure further contains 2-4 wt % of bismuth based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %. It should be particularly noted that, when containing 2-4 wt % of bismuth and 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium at the same time, the solder alloy of the present disclosure would have properties such as better yield strength and tensile strength, and the wettability of the solder alloy on a copper substrate is improved. In addition, the solder joints formed by solder made from the solder alloy may suppress the growth of intermetallic compounds more effectively. Moreover, when the content of the bismuth is higher than 2.0 wt %, the solder joints formed by solder made from the solder alloy obtain better performance in the thermal cycling test, and the wettability of the solder alloy for the copper substrate is also improved; and when the content of the bismuth is lower than 4 wt %, properties such as yield strength and tensile strength of the solder alloy would not be too strong, and the solder joints formed by solder made from the solder alloy would be capable of subjecting to higher numbers of cycles during the thermal cycling test. More preferably, the content of the bismuth is 2.9-3.1 wt %. In addition, when the content of the bismuth is 2.9-3.1 wt %, best wettability for the copper substrate would be achieved, and the thickness of the intermetallic compound layer of the solder joints would be reduced more effectively.


Optionally, the solder alloy provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


The various components of the solder alloy cooperate with one another, so that the solder made of the solder alloy maintains good or better performance in the thermal cycling test, performs better to meet the requirements of the ball shear test specified in the automotive specification of AEC-Q100, also has good mechanical strength, yield strength, tensile strength and the like, and exhibits good wettability for copper substrate.


Optionally, the solder alloy provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.4-0.6 wt % of copper, 0.03-0.075 wt % of rhodium, 0.045-0.055 wt % of nickel, 2.9-3.1 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


As such, the various components of the solder alloy cooperate with one another, so that the solder alloy exhibits better mechanical strength, yield strength, tensile strength and the like, also maintains better performance in the thermal cycling test, and performs better to meet the requirements of the ball shear test specified in the automotive specification of AEC-Q100.


On the other hand, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide solder which is formed by any one of the above solder alloys.


The solder could be applied to soldering and thus the resultant solder joints would have good mechanical strength, yield strength, tensile strength and the like, perform more excellently in a thermal cycling test, and perform better to meet the requirements of a ball shear test specified in the automotive specification of AEC-Q100.


Optionally, in the solder provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure, the solder alloy further contains 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, in the solder provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure, the solder alloy further contains 2-4 wt % of bismuth based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


Optionally, in the solder provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure, the solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.


The solder may adopt various structures. Optionally, the solder is a solder ball and the diameter of the solder ball is 0.05-1 mm.


For example, the diameter of the solder ball may be 0.05 mm, 0.15 mm, 0.25 mm, 0.35 mm, 0.45 mm, 0.55 mm, 0.65 mm, 0.75 mm, 0.85 mm, 0.95 mm, 1 mm or the like.


When the alloy being used as solder, the formed solder ball would have excellent or better mechanical properties such as hardness, yield strength and tensile strength. In addition, in a dense and precise packaging process, a solder joint of the solder ball would also have better performance in the thermal cycling test and perform better to meet the requirements of the ball shear test specified in the automotive specification of AEC-Q100.


On the other hand, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide a method for producing solder. The production method includes the following steps:


step 1, mixing silver, copper, rhodium and tin according to the mass percentage thereof in any one of the above solder alloys and melting the mixture to obtain a melt.


It should be noted that a stirring operation needs to be performed during mixing so as to obtain the melt with uniform composition.


Step 2 is molding the melt to obtain the solder.


Optionally, the production method includes the following steps when the solder alloy further contains 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin and nickel and then melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.


When the solder alloy contains nickel, the step of mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin and nickel and then melting the mixture to obtain the melt includes, but is not limited to the following steps:


step a, enabling rhodium, tin and nickel to form pre-alloy in a cycle oven;


mixing rhodium, tin and nickel, and then melting and cooling the mixture to obtain the pre-alloy formed by rhodium, tin and nickel; and


step b, mixing the pre-alloy with silver and copper and then melting the mixture to obtain the melt.


As such, the various components could be molten sufficiently and uniformly dispersed, which facilitates obtaining the melt with a uniform composition.


Optionally, the production method includes the following steps when the solder alloy further contains 2-4 wt % of bismuth based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100%: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin and bismuth, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.


Optionally, the production method includes the following steps when the solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-1 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100%: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin, nickel and bismuth, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder


The above production method is simple and could facilitate the popularization of the use of the solder. The produced solder has better mechanical properties, and the resultant solder joints could maintain good or better performance in the thermal cycling test, and have a higher qualified rate in the ball shear test specified in the automotive specification of AEC-Q100.


The present disclosure will be further described below through specific examples.


In the following specific examples, operations involved, of which conditions are not specified, are performed under conventional conditions or conditions suggested by a manufacturer. Used raw materials, of which manufacturers and specifications are not noted, are conventional products which are available by purchase from the market.


It should be noted that, all the chemical components of alloys in the following examples and comparative examples were measured with a direct-reading spectrometer having the model of SPECTROLAB M12, which was purchased from German Spaak Analytical Instrument Company (the agent of which is Shanghai Jinpu Instrument Co., Ltd.). Moreover, the alloys of the examples and the comparative examples were prepared from the required amounts of tin, silver and copper and other required metals (such as rhodium, nickel or bismuth), according to the resultant metal content ratio in the alloy, by a cycle oven and a melting furnace. Considering the melting points and properties of the rhodium and nickel elements, it is necessary to prepare a pre-alloy of tin and said two metal elements first by a cycle oven. In the process of preparing a pre-alloy from rhodium, nickel and tin by a cycle oven, it is necessary to perform stirring to avoid segregation and poor dissolution of rhodium and nickel elements.


Comparative Examples 1, 4 and 7

SAC alloys and solder balls formed by the SAC alloys


The SAC alloys of each of comparative examples 1, 4 and 7 contained tin, silver and copper, and the chemical components and the content (wt %) thereof in the SAC alloys are respectively listed in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.


Examples 1-9 and Comparative Examples 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9

Rhodium-containing solder alloys and solder balls formed by the solder alloys


The solder alloys of each of examples 1-9 and comparative examples 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 contained tin, silver, copper and rhodium, and the chemical components and the content (wt %) thereof in the solder alloys are respectively listed in Tables 1-3.











TABLE 1









Content (wt %)














Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 1
example 2
1
2
3
example 3
















Sn
95.5102
95.4388
95.4554
95.4606
95.4535
95.3976


Ag
3.9525
4.0157
3.9849
3.9587
3.9408
3.9780


Cu
0.5010
0.5065
0.5016
0.5035
0.5019
0.5055


Rh
0
0.0117
0.0312
0.0501
0.0724
0.0918


Ni
0.0076
0.0007
0.0007
0.0005
0.0011
0.0006


Bi
0.0021
0.0019
0.0016
0.0017
0.0018
0.0016


















TABLE 2









Content (wt %)














Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 4
example 5
4
5
6
example 6
















Sn
96.4956
96.4381
96.5037
96.4206
96.4448
96.3681


Ag
2.9853
3.0198
2.9524
2.9951
2.9635
3.0096


Cu
0.4909
0.5065
0.4845
0.5067
0.4945
0.5045


Rh
0
0.0101
0.0321
0.0515
0.0712
0.0908


Ni
0.0002
0.0004
0.0004
0.0008
0.0003
0.0003


Bi
0.0022
0.002
0.0020
0.0020
0.0020
0.0021


















TABLE 3









Content (wt %)














Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 7
example 8
7
8
9
example 9
















Sn
98.4241
98.4653
98.4865
98.4961
98.4241
98.4653


Ag
1.0329
1.0006
0.9826
0.9811
1.0329
1.0006


Cu
0.5213
0.5125
0.5117
0.5011
0.5213
0.5125


Rh
0
0.0122
0.0329
0.0525
0.0721
0.0927


Ni
0.0001
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
0.0001
0.0002


Bi
0.0016
0.0015
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
0.0015









COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 10, 13, 16 AND 19

Nickel-containing solder alloys and solder balls formed by the solder alloys


The solder alloys of each of comparative examples 10, 13, 16 and 19 contained tin, silver, copper and nickel, and the chemical components and the content (wt %) thereof in the solder alloy are respectively listed in Tables 4-7.


Examples 10-29 and Comparative Examples 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 and 21

Rhodium- and nickel-containing solder alloys and solder balls formed by the solder alloys


The solder alloys of each of examples 10-29 and comparative examples 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 and 21 contained tin, silver, copper, rhodium and nickel, and the chemical components and the content (wt %) thereof in the solder alloy are respectively listed in Tables 4-7.











TABLE 4









Content (wt %)
















Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 10
example 11
10
11
12
13
14
example 12


















Sn
95.4021
95.4185
95.4021
95.4102
95.3658
95.385
95.3602
95.2635


Ag
4.0108
3.9874
3.9861
3.9910
4.0116
3.9775
3.9887
4.0564


Cu
0.5067
0.4987
0.5042
0.4833
0.5001
0.5044
0.4993
0.5083


Rh
0
0.0131
0.0232
0.0334
0.0421
0.0533
0.0718
0.0932


Ni
0.0515
0.0512
0.0516
0.0510
0.0498
0.0503
0.0498
0.0507


Bi
0.0021
0.0021
0.0021
0.0021
0.0022
0.0022
0.0022
0.0022


















TABLE 5









Content (wt %)
















Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 13
example 14
15
16
17
18
19
example 15


















Sn
96.3696
96.4663
96.4462
96.3988
96.3932
96.3715
96.3665
96.3359


Ag
3.0411
2.9408
2.9502
2.9802
2.994
3.0058
2.9948
3.0036


Cu
0.4987
0.4927
0.4931
0.5014
0.4889
0.4893
0.4869
0.4879


Rh
0
0.0128
0.0227
0.0331
0.0434
0.0536
0.0732
0.0935


Ni
0.0506
0.0493
0.0495
0.0488
0.0504
0.0507
0.0503
0.0501


Bi
0.0019
0.0019
0.0019
0.0020
0.0023
0.0023
0.0023
0.0023


















TABLE 6









Content (wt %)
















Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 16
example 17
20
21
22
23
24
example 18


















Sn
98.2061
98.1429
98.1392
98.1785
98.1664
98.1134
98.1495
98.1004


Ag
1.2038
1.2651
1.2620
1.2209
1.2074
1.2556
1.2001
1.2193


Cu
0.5041
0.5017
0.5012
0.4922
0.5077
0.5078
0.5011
0.5100


Rh
0
0.0121
0.0216
0.0325
0.0415
0.0503
0.0709
0.0914


Ni
0.0517
0.0524
0.0523
0.0521
0.0525
0.0503
0.0521
0.0507


Bi
0.0022
0.0023
0.0019
0.0019
0.002
0.002
0.0024
0.0032


















TABLE 7









Content (wt %)
















Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 19
example 20
25
26
27
28
29
example 21


















Sn
98.4169
98.4185
98.3942
98.4269
98.2784
98.2854
98.2503
98.2599


Ag
1.0181
1.0036
1.0116
0.9852
1.089
1.0819
1.0899
1.0649


Cu
0.4961
0.4971
0.5008
0.4852
0.5134
0.5052
0.5104
0.506


Rh
0
0.0128
0.0232
0.0335
0.0425
0.0533
0.0731
0.0928


Ni
0.0496
0.0493
0.0503
0.0507
0.0515
0.0503
0.0511
0.0513


Bi
0.0014
0.0014
0.0014
0.0014
0.0027
0.0027
0.0027
0.0027









Comparative Examples 22, 25 and 28

Nickel- and bismuth-containing solder alloys and solder balls formed by the solder alloys


The solder alloys of each of comparative examples 22, 25 and 28 contained tin, silver, copper, nickel and bismuth, and the chemical components and the content (wt %) thereof in the solder alloy are respectively listed in Tables 8-10.


Examples 30-38 and Comparative Examples 23, 24, 26, 27, 29 and 30

Rhodium-, nickel- and bismuth-containing solder alloys and solder balls formed by the solder alloys


The solder alloys of each of examples 30-38 and comparative examples 23, 24, 26, 27, 29 and 30 contained tin, silver, copper, rhodium, nickel and bismuth, and the chemical components and the content (wt %) thereof in the solder alloy are respectively listed in Tables 8-10.











TABLE 8









Content (wt %)














Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 22
example 23
30
31
32
example 24
















Sn
95.4427
95.3617
95.3685
95.4078
95.3128
95.2896


Ag
0.9667
1.0217
0.9912
1.0147
1.0073
0.9986


Cu
0.4787
0.4950
0.4870
0.4918
0.4897
0.4954


Rh
0
0.0095
0.0254
0.0529
0.0831
0.0919


Ni
0.0513
0.0503
0.0505
0.0512
0.0487
0.0504


Bi
3.0365
3.0338
3.0537
2.9579
3.0346
3.0487


















TABLE 9









Content (wt %)














Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 25
example 26
33
34
35
example 27
















Sn
93.4410
93.3407
93.3357
93.3897
93.4288
93.3535


Ag
3.0308
3.0232
3.0878
3.0038
2.9862
3.0453


Cu
0.4925
0.4926
0.4972
0.4921
0.4864
0.4941


Rh
0
0.0098
0.0246
0.0538
0.0841
0.0937


Ni
0.0458
0.0540
0.0461
0.0455
0.0454
0.0463


Bi
2.9621
2.9901
2.9816
2.9868
2.9409
2.9392


















TABLE 10









Content (wt %)














Comparative
Comparative
Example
Example
Example
Comparative


Components
example 28
example 29
36
37
38
example 30
















Sn
92.3901
92.3712
92.3524
92.3116
91.5901
91.5274


Ag
3.9567
3.9337
3.9442
3.9571
3.9367
3.9411


Cu
0.5109
0.5144
0.5178
0.5167
0.4980
0.5042


Rh
0
0.0115
0.0238
0.0531
0.0835
0.0933


Ni
0.0520
0.0512
0.0505
0.0512
0.0509
0.0504


Bi
3.0583
3.0883
3.0825
3.0805
3.0061
3.0595









Application Example 1

<Analysis of Melting Point of Alloys>


A. Analysis Method


The alloys of examples 1-29 and comparative examples 1-21 were analyzed with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, model: Perkin Elmer DSC 2260), and the obtained results are shown in FIG. 1 (examples 1-3 and comparative examples 1-3), FIG. 2 (examples 4-6 and comparative examples 4-6), FIG. 3 (examples 7-9 and comparative examples 7-9), FIG. 4 (examples 11, 13 and 14 and comparative examples 10-12), FIG. 5 (examples 16, 18 and 19 and comparative examples 13-15), FIG. 6 (examples 20-24 and comparative examples 16-18), and FIG. 7 (examples 26, 28 and 29 and comparative examples 19-21).


B. Results and Discussion


It can be seen from FIGS. 1-7 that, differential thermal curves basically overlapped, and the melting points of the alloys without addition of rhodium and with the addition of an appropriate amount of rhodium were nearly the same, which indicates that in the present disclosure, the addition of rhodium into the solder alloy would not affect the melting point of the resultant alloys.


Application Example 2

<Analysis of Vickers Hardness of Solder Ball>


A. Analysis Method


The following experiment was performed with a Vickers hardness tester having the model of FM-100e, which was purchased from Taiwan Nakazawa Co., Ltd. After the alloy without addition of rhodium and the alloy with the addition of an appropriate amount of rhodium as shown in the examples and comparative examples were formed into solder balls having a specific diameter (0.45 mm or 0.25 mm), the solder balls were soldered on a substrate to form junctions and epoxy resin was injected between the junctions and mould for embedding, so that the junction portions were fixed by the epoxy resin. Then, the mould was removed and the junction portions were ground with a grinder until about two-quarters of the balls remained; and the balls were polished and the Vickers hardness of the solder balls as ground was measured with a Vickers hardness tester (load: 10 g; time: 10 seconds). Vickers hardness results of alloys of the examples 1-29 and the comparative examples 1-21 obtained through the above method analysis, silver, copper, nickel and rhodium content in the alloys of the various examples and the comparative examples and diameters of the prepared solder balls are listed in Table 11 respectively.















TABLE 11






Solder ball
Silver
Copper
Nickel
Rhodium
Vickers



Diameter
content
content
content
content
Hardness


Alloy
(mm)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(Hv)





















Comparative
0.45.
3.9525
0.501
0.0076
0
15.90


example 1


Comparative

4.0157.
0.5065
0.0007
0.0117
15.93


example 2


Example 1

3.9849
0.5016
0.0007
0.0312
16.80


Example 2

3.9587
0.5035
0.0005
0.0501
17.23


Example 3

3.9408
0.5019
0.0011
0.0724
17.48


Comparative

3.9780.
0.5055
0.0006
0.0918
17.52


example 3


Comparative
0.45.
2.9853
0.4909
0.0002
0
13.57


example 4


Comparative

3.0198.
0.5065
0.0004
0.0101
14.33


example 5


Example 4

2.9524
0.4845
0.0004
0.0321
15.67


Example 5

2.9951
0.5067
0.0008
0.0515
16.70


Example 6

2.9635
0.4945
0.0003
0.0712
16.85


Comparative

3.0096.
0.5045
0.0003
0.0908
16.98


example 6


Comparative
0.45.
1.0329
0.5213
0.0001
0
11.82


example 7


Comparative

1.0006.
0.5125
0.0002
0.0122
12.14


example 8


Example 7

0.9826
0.5117
0.0002
0.0329
12.71


Example 8

0.9811
0.5011
0.0002
0.0525
13.60


Example 9

1.0329
0.5213
0.0001
0.0721
13.89


Comparative

1.0006.
0.5125
0.0002
0.0927
14.60


example 9


Comparative
0.25.
4.0108
0.5067
0.0515
0
18.61


example 10


Comparative

3.9874.
0.4987
0.0512
0.0131
18.66


example 11


Example 10

3.9861
0.5042
0.0516
0.0232
18.67


Example 11

3.9910
0.4833
0.051
0.0334
19.01


Example 12

4.0116
0.5001
0.0498
0.0421
19.48


Example 13

3.9775
0.5044
0.0503
0.0533
19.91


Example 14

3.9887
0.4993
0.0498
0.0718
20.77


Comparative

4.0564.
0.5083
0.0507
0.0932
21.89


example 12


Comparative
0.25.
3.0411
0.4987
0.0506
0
17.90


example 13


Comparative

2.9408.
0.4927
0.0493
0.0128
18.21


example 14


Example 15

2.9502
0.4931
0.0495
0.0227
18.61


Example 16

2.9802
0.5014
0.0488
0.0331
18.97


Example 17

2.994
0.4889
0.0504
0.0434
19.35


Example 18

3.0058
0.4893
0.0507
0.0536
19.87


Example 19

2.9948
0.4869
0.0503
0.0732
20.64


Comparative

3.0036.
0.4879
0.0501
0.0935
21.65


example 15


Comparative
0.25.
1.2038
0.5041
0.0517
0
12.73


example 16


Comparative

1.2651.
0.5017
0.0524
0.0121
13.17


example 17


Example 20

1.2620
0.5012
0.0523
0.0216
13.87


Example 21

1.2209
0.4922
0.0521
0.0325
14.30


Example 22

1.2074
0.5077
0.0525
0.0415
14.57


Example 23

1.2556
0.5078
0.0503
0.0503
15.43


Example 24

1.2001
0.5011
0.0521
0.0709
15.69


Comparative

1.2193.
0.5100
0.0507
0.0914
15.81


example 18


Comparative
0.25.
1.0181
0.4961
0.0496
0
13.24


example 19


Comparative

1.0036.
0.4971
0.0493
0.0128
13.33


example 20


Example 25

1.0116
0.5008
0.0503
0.0232
13.65


Example 26

0.9852
0.4852
0.0507
0.0335
13.84


Example 27

1.0890
0.5134
0.0515
0.0425
14.35


Example 28

1.0819
0.5052
0.0503
0.0533
14.69


Example 29

1.0899
0.5104
0.0511
0.0731
15.31


Comparative

1.0649.
0.5060
0.0513
0.0928
15.67


example 21









B. Results and Discussion


It can be seen from the hardness results in Table 11 that, when the solder balls have the same diameter and similar silver content, the hardness of the solder balls would increase accordingly with the increase of rhodium content. It can be seen that the hardness of the alloy could be increased by adding rhodium to the solder alloy.


Application Example 3

<Solder Ball Shear Test>


A. Analysis Method


It should be noted first that the solder ball shear test was performed according to the automotive specification of AEC-Q100 and had the following steps.


Step (1)-ball placement: alloys of the examples and comparative examples were respectively prepared into solder balls having a specific diameter (0.45 mm or 0.25 mm) and then the solder balls were attached to a pad through reflow to form solder joints, wherein when the diameter of the solder balls was 0.45 mm, an opening of the pad had a diameter of 0.40 mm; and when the diameter of the solder balls was 0.25 mm, the opening of the pad had a diameter of 0.25 mm.


Step (2)-reflow: reflow was performed on the solder balls by increasing the temperature from room temperature. Under the condition that internal and external temperatures were uniform, the temperature was risen to peak temperature, which was about 250±5 □, as shown by the profile of FIG. 8. The peak temperature was maintained for about 40-60 seconds (peak time). The reflow was performed on the solder balls and the pad which were subjected to the ball placement in step (1) once by a reflow oven.


Step (3)-reflowing for three times: reflow was performed for three times by the reflow oven on the solder balls and the pad processed in step (2).


Step (4)-solder ball shear test: the ball shear test was performed on the encapsulation obtained after the reflow in steps (2) and (3), by a thrust-tensile machine having the model of Dage-4000 purchased from the Schmidt company. According to 010 REV-A in the specification of AEC-Q100, the contact height (shear height) of a shear knife reached ⅓ of the solder joints and the shear knife shall not touch a soldering-resistance layer of the pad and various conditions of the solder ball shear test are listed in Table 12.













TABLE 12









Range
2 kg




Shear speed
400 μm/s



Test load
25 kg











Ball size
0.45 mm
0.25 mm



Shear height
120 μm
63 μm











Over travel
40 μm










Step (5)-observation with a microscope: each of the solder balls would generate a fracture surface due to the fracture caused by the shear test in step (4). The fracture surface was observed with a microscope and the fracture surfaces were divided into five modes (Mode 1-Mode 5) of fracture surface. The description of the fracture surfaces of Mode 1-Mode 5, the proportions of residual tin in the fracture surfaces, and whether an intermetallic compound layer is fractured are listed in Table 13. In addition, photos of the fracture surfaces of Mode 1-Mode 5 are shown in FIGS. 9-13.













TABLE 13







Proportion
Whether the





of
intermetallic



Description of fracture
residual
compound layer


Mode
surface
tin (%)
is fractured
FIG.



















1
ductile fracture occurs
100%
no
9



from the solder portion



and solder remains on all



the fracture surfaces


2
brittle fracture occurs from
100%
no
10



the solder portion and



solder remains on all the



fracture surfaces


3
fracture occurs from the
<25%
yes
11



solder portion and the



intermetallic compound



layer


4
fracture occurs from the
0%
no
12



pad


5
the fracture situations of
<25%
yes
13



modes 1-3 all occur









The numbers of obtaining each fracture surface mode (the times that the fracture surfaces belonged to Mode 1, Mode 3 or Mode 5) of the alloys of examples 1-29 and comparative examples 1-21 after the above shear test, silver, copper, nickel and rhodium content in alloys of various examples and comparative examples, and the diameters of the prepared solder balls are respectively listed in Table 14 below, wherein the results of the fracture surface modes in Table 14 were obtained through a statistical analysis in which the shear test was performed on 15 (or 20) solder balls that were prepared from the same alloy and had the same diameter.













TABLE 14









Solder

Fracture surface mode
















ball
Silver
Copper
Nickel
Rhodium
numbers
numbers
numbers



diameter
content
content
content
content
of Mode
of Mode
of Mode


Alloy
(mm)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
1
3
5


















Comparative
0.45.
3.9525
0.501
0.0076
0
5
0
10


example 1


Comparative

4.0157.
0.5065
0.0007
0.0117
9
0
6


example 2


Example 1

3.9849
0.5016
0.0007
0.0312
15
0
0


Example 2

3.9587
0.5035
0.0005
0.0501
15
0
0


Example 3

3.9408
0.5019
0.0011
0.0724
15
0
0


Comparative

3.9780.
0.5055
0.0006
0.0918
13
0
2


example 3


Comparative
0.45.
2.9853
0.4909
0.0002
0
4
3
8


example 4


Comparative

3.0198.
0.5065
0.0004
0.0101
6
4
5


example 5


Example 4

2.9524
0.4845
0.0004
0.0321
15
0
0


Example 5

2.9951
0.5067
0.0008
0.0515
15
0
0


Example 6

2.9635
0.4945
0.0003
0.0712
15
0
0


Comparative

3.0096.
0.5045
0.0003
0.0908
14
0
1


example 6


Comparative
0.45.
1.0329
0.5213
0.0001
0
5
2
8


example 7


Comparative

1.0006.
0.5125
0.0002
0.0122
6
4
5


example 8


Example 7

0.9826
0.5117
0.0002
0.0329
15
0
0


Example 8

0.9811
0.5011
0.0002
0.0525
15
0
0


Example 9

1.0329
0.5213
0.0001
0.0721
15
0
0


Comparative

1.0006.
0.5125
0.0002
0.0927
14
0
1


example 9


Comparative
0.25.
4.0108
0.5067
0.0515
0
15
0
5


example 10


Comparative

3.9874.
0.4987
0.0512
0.0131
16
0
4


example 11


Example 10

3.9861
0.5042
0.0516
0.0232
20
0
0


Example 11

3.991
0.4833
0.051
0.0334
20
0
0


Example 12

4.0116
0.5001
0.0498
0.0421
20
0
0


Example 13

3.9775
0.5044
0.0503
0.0533
20
0
0


Example 14

3.9887
0.4993
0.0498
0.0718
20
0
0


Comparative

4.0564.
0.5083
0.0507
0.0932
19
0
1


example 12


Comparative
0.25.
3.0411
0.4987
0.0506
0
17
0
3


example 13


Comparative

2.9408.
0.4927
0.0493
0.0128
17
0
3


example 14


Example 15

2.9502
0.4931
0.0495
0.0227
20
0
0


Example 16

2.9802
0.5014
0.0488
0.0331
20
0
0


Example 17

2.994
0.4889
0.0504
0.0434
20
0
0


Example 18

3.0058
0.4893
0.0507
0.0536
20
0
0


Example 19

2.9948
0.4869
0.0503
0.0732
20
0
0


Comparative

3.0036.
0.4879
0.0501
0.0935
19
0
1


example 15


Comparative
0.25.
1.2038
0.5041
0.0517
0
17
0
3


example 16


Comparative

1.2651.
0.5017
0.0524
0.0121
20
0
0


example 17


Example 20

1.2620
0.5012
0.0523
0.0216
20
0
0


Example 21

1.2209
0.4922
0.0521
0.0325
20
0
0


Example 22

1.2074
0.5077
0.0525
0.0415
20
0
0


Example 23

1.2556
0.5078
0.0503
0.0503
20
0
0


Example 24

1.2001
0.5011
0.0521
0.0709
20
0
0


Comparative

1.2193.
0.5100
0.0507
0.0914
19
0
1


example 18


Comparative
0.25.
1.0181
0.4961
0.0496
0
17
0
3


example 19


Comparative

1.0036.
0.4971
0.0493
0.0128
20
0
0


example 20


Example 25

1.0116
0.5008
0.0503
0.0232
20
0
0


Example 26

0.9852
0.4852
0.0507
0.0335
20
0
0


Example 27

1.0890
0.5134
0.0515
0.0425
20
0
0


Example 28

1.0819
0.5052
0.0503
0.0533
20
0
0


Example 29

1.0899
0.5104
0.0511
0.0731
20
0
0


Comparative

1.0649.
0.5060
0.0513
0.0928
19
0
1


example 21









According to the numbers of the fracture surface modes in Table 14 above, the occurrence rate that the intermetallic compound layer was fractured after the shear test (Mode 3 or Mode 5) was calculated. The formula of the occurrence rate is shown as formula I, and the calculation results are listed in Table 15 below.

Occurrence rate (%)=(numbers of Mode 3+numbers of Mode 5)/(numbers of Mode 1+numbers of Mode 3+numbers of Mode 5)*100  (formula I)















TABLE 15











The occurrence rate



Solder




of fracture of



ball
Silver
Copper
Nickel
Rhodium
the intermetallic



diameter
content
content
content
content
compound layer


Alloy
(mm)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(%)





















Comparative
0.45.
3.9525
0.501
0.0076
0
67


example 1


Comparative

4.0157.
0.5065
0.0007
0.0117
40


example 2


Example 1

3.9849
0.5016
0.0007
0.0312
0


Example 2

3.9587
0.5035
0.0005
0.0501
0


Example 3

3.9408
0.5019
0.0011
0.0724
0


Comparative

3.9780.
0.5055
0.0006
0.0918
13


example 3


Comparative
0.45.
2.9853
0.4909
0.0002
0
73


example 4


Comparative

3.0198.
0.5065
0.0004
0.0101
60


example 5


Example 4

2.9524
0.4845
0.0004
0.0321
0


Example 5

2.9951
0.5067
0.0008
0.0515
0


Example 6

2.9635
0.4945
0.0003
0.0712
0


Comparative

3.0096.
0.5045
0.0003
0.0908
7


example 6


Comparative
0.45.
1.0329
0.5213
0.0001
0
67


example 7


Comparative

1.0006.
0.5125
0.0002
0.0122
60


example 8


Example 7

0.9826
0.5117
0.0002
0.0329
0


Example 8

0.9811
0.5011
0.0002
0.0525
0


Example 9

1.0329
0.5213
0.0001
0.0721
0


Comparative

1.0006.
0.5125
0.0002
0.0927
7


example 9


Comparative
0.25.
4.0108
0.5067
0.0515
0
25


example 10


Comparative

3.9874.
0.4987
0.0512
0.0131
20


example 11


Example 10

3.9861
0.5042
0.0516
0.0232
0


Example 11

3.9910
0.4833
0.051
0.0334
0


Example 12

4.0116
0.5001
0.0498
0.0421
0


Example 13

3.9775
0.5044
0.0503
0.0533
0


Example 14

3.9887
0.4993
0.0498
0.0718
0


Comparative

4.0564.
0.5083
0.0507
0.0932
5


example 12


Comparative
0.25.
3.0411
0.4987
0.0506
0
15


example 13


Comparative

2.9408.
0.4927
0.0493
0.0128
15


example 14


Example 15

2.9502
0.4931
0.0495
0.0227
0


Example 16

2.9802
0.5014
0.0488
0.0331
0


Example 17

2.9940
0.4889
0.0504
0.0434
0


Example 18

3.0058
0.4893
0.0507
0.0536
0


Example 19

2.9948
0.4869
0.0503
0.0732
0


Comparative

3.0036.
0.4879
0.0501
0.0935
5


example 15


Comparative
0.25.
1.2038
0.5041
0.0517
0
15


example 16


Comparative

1.2651.
0.5017
0.0524
0.0121
0


example 17


Example 20

1.2620
0.5012
0.0523
0.0216
0


Example 21

1.2209
0.4922
0.0521
0.0325
0


Example 22

1.2074
0.5077
0.0525
0.0415
0


Example 23

1.2556
0.5078
0.0503
0.0503
0


Example 24

1.2001
0.5011
0.0521
0.0709
0


Comparative

1.2193.
0.5100
0.0507
0.0914
5


example 18


Comparative
0.25.
1.0181
0.4961
0.0496
0
15


example 19


Comparative

1.0036.
0.4971
0.0493
0.0128
0


example 20


Example 25

1.0116
0.5008
0.0503
0.0232
0


Example 26

0.9852
0.4852
0.0507
0.0335
0


Example 27

1.0890
0.5134
0.0515
0.0425
0


Example 28

1.0819
0.5052
0.0503
0.0533
0


Example 29

1.0899
0.5104
0.0511
0.0731
0


Comparative

1.0649.
0.5060
0.0513
0.0928
5


example 21









B. Results and Discussion


It can be seen from the comparison of examples 1-29 and comparative examples 1-21 that, when the solder alloys contained 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, the probability that the intermetallic compound layer was fractured after the alloy was subjected to multiple reflows and then to the ball shear test (the specification of AEC-Q100) was 0%; but for the solder alloys containing less than 0.02 wt % or greater than 0.085 wt % of rhodium, the occurrence rate that the intermetallic compound layer was fractured was not lower than 5%, and even as high as 73%, except those of the comparative examples 17 and 20 being 0%.


Therefore, it can be seen from the above results that, when the solder alloy containing 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium of the present disclosure is used as solder balls, and when the solder balls are placed on the pad, subjected to three reflows and then the solder ball shear test according to the automotive specification of AEC-Q100, and when the shear speed is higher than 400 μm/s, the intermetallic compound layer would not be fractured (mode 1 or mode 5). In contrast, when the solder alloys having a rhodium content not ranging from 0.02 to 0.085 wt % is subjected to the solder ball shear test, a certain proportion of intermetallic compound layers would be fractured, which result in that, the shear force which should be withstood by the solder joints formed from the alloy could not be increased as expected, yet the cost is increased.


Application Example 4

<Thermal Cycling Test (TCT)>


A. Analysis Method


The thermal cycling test was performed by placing the solder balls (the diameter was 0.45 mm) prepared from each of examples 30-38 and comparative examples 22-30 on the pad, then soldering them on a PCB board through SMT, and subjecting them to the thermal cycling test at the level 1 (−50 □ to +1500 □, 1000 cycles). The final results of the thermal cycling test are shown in FIG. 14 (examples 30-32 and comparative examples 22-24), FIG. 15 (examples 33-35 and comparative examples 25-27), and FIG. 16 (examples 36-38 and comparative examples 28-30). Silver, copper, nickel, bismuth and rhodium content of the examples 30-38 and the comparative examples 22-30 are listed in Table 16 below.
















TABLE 16








Silver
Copper
Nickel
Bismuth
Rhodium




content
content
content
content
content



Alloy
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)
(wt %)






















FIG. 14
Comparative
0.9667.
0.4787
0.0513
2.9718
0



example 22



Comparative
1.0217.
0.4950
0.0503
2.9973
0.0095



example 23



Example 30
0.9912
0.4870
0.0505
2.9998
0.0254



Example 31
1.0147
0.4918
0.0512
2.9914
0.0529



Example 32
1.0073
0.4987
0.0487
2.9409
0.0831



Comparative
0.9986.
0.4954
0.0504
2.9558
0.0919



example 24


FIG. 15
Comparative
3.0308.
0.4925
0.0458
2.9815
0



example 25



Comparative
3.0232.
0.4926
0.0540
2.9901
0.0098



example 26



Example 33
3.0878
0.4972
0.0461
2.9887
0.0246



Example 34
3.0038
0.4921
0.0455
2.9668
0.0538



Example 35
2.9862
0.4864
0.0454
2.9409
0.0841



Comparative
3.0453.
0.4941
0.0463
2.9681
0.0937



example 27


FIG. 16
Comparative
3.9567.
0.5109
0.0520
3.0583
0



example 28



Comparative
3.9337.
0.5144
0.0512
3.0883
0.0115



example 29



Example 36
3.9442
0.5178
0.0505
3.0825
0.0238



Example 37
3.9571
0.5167
0.0512
3.0805
0.0531



Example 38
3.9367
0.4980
0.0509
3.0061
0.0835



Comparative
3.9411.
0.5042
0.0504
3.0595
0.0933



example 30









B. Results and Discussion


It should be noted first that the thermal cycling test is used for testing the ability of parts to withstand extreme temperatures (extremely high temperature and extremely low temperature). As shown in FIGS. 14-16, when having the same failure rates, if a part has longer failure time, it would have better capability to withstand extreme temperatures.


According to FIGS. 14-16, it can be found from the comparison among the comparative examples 23, 26 and 29 and examples 30, 33 and 36 that, when the added amount of rhodium is lower than 0.02 wt %, the numbers of the thermal cycling test could not be increased effectively.


It should be additionally noted that, it can be found from the numbers of the thermal cycling test of the comparative examples 24, 27 and 30 and examples 32, 35 and 38 that, when the added amount of rhodium is higher than 0.085 wt %, the numbers of the thermal cycling test that the part can withstand would be reduced, which does not meet the requirements for use.


In addition, the alloys in examples 30-38, each of which contains 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, can withstand the thermal cycling test for more than 2000 times approximately. Moreover, by adding the rhodium element properly, the performance of the solder joint in the thermal cycling test could be improved, but when the added amount of rhodium is higher than 0.085 wt % (such as 0.09 wt %), the numbers of the thermal cycling test that the solder joint can withstand could not be increased anymore, but in contrast the production cost is increased. Therefore, it is verified that the addition of excess amount of the rhodium element could not effectively increase the numbers of the thermal cycling test.


The above description is only preferred embodiments of the present disclosure, and is not intended to limit the scope of protection of the present disclosure. Any modifications, equivalents, improvements and the like made within the spirit and principles of the present disclosure should be included within the scope of protection of the present disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A solder alloy, comprising: 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-0.7 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, and the balance of wt % being substantially tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 2. The solder alloy according to claim 1, wherein the content of the rhodium is 0.03-0.075 wt %.
  • 3. The solder alloy according to claim 1, wherein the content of the copper is 0.4-0.6 wt %.
  • 4. The solder alloy according to claim 1, further containing 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 5. The solder alloy according to claim 4, wherein the content of the nickel is 0.045-0.055 wt %.
  • 6. The solder alloy according to claim 1, further containing 2-4 wt % of bismuth, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 7. The solder alloy according to claim 6, wherein the content of the bismuth is 2.9-3.1 wt %.
  • 8. The solder alloy according to claim 1, containing 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-0.7 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 9. The solder alloy according to claim 8, containing 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.4-0.6 wt % of copper, 0.03-0.075 wt % of rhodium, 0.045-0.055 wt % of nickel, 2.9-3.1 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on of the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 10. Solder being formed by a solder alloy comprising 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-0.7 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, and the balance of wt % being substantially tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 11. The solder according to claim 10, wherein the solder alloy further contains 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 12. The solder according to claim 10, wherein the solder alloy further contains 2-4 wt % of bismuth based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 13. The solder according to claim 10, wherein the solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-0.7 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %.
  • 14. The solder according to claim 10, wherein the solder is a solder ball and the diameter of the solder ball is 0.05-1 mm.
  • 15. A method for producing solder, comprising: mixing silver, copper, rhodium and tin according to the mass percentage of each component of the solder alloy of claim 1, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; andmolding the melt to obtain the solder.
  • 16. The method according to claim 15, comprising the following steps when the solder alloy further contains 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin and nickel, melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.
  • 17. The method according to claim 15, comprising the following steps when the solder alloy further contains 2-4 wt % of bismuth, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin and bismuth, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.
  • 18. The method according to claim 15, comprising the following steps when the solder alloy contains 0.9-4.1 wt % of silver, 0.3-0.7 wt % of copper, 0.02-0.085 wt % of rhodium, 0.04-0.06 wt % of nickel, 2-4 wt % of bismuth, and the balance being tin, based on the total weight of the solder alloy being 100 wt %: mixing silver, copper, rhodium, tin, nickel and bismuth, and melting the mixture to obtain a melt; and molding the melt to obtain the solder.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
107104271 A Feb 2018 TW national
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
6861346 Tong Mar 2005 B2
8221560 Kim et al. Jul 2012 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
101641179 Feb 2010 CN
S5516731 Feb 1980 JP
S59126739 Jul 1984 JP
H08276291 Oct 1996 JP
2000208934 Jul 2000 JP
2001205476 Jul 2001 JP
WO2001031074 May 2001 WO
WO2001031074 May 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201810372911.5 dated Mar. 2, 2020 in Chinese with an English translation.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190270168 A1 Sep 2019 US