The atomic layer controlled growth or atomic layer deposition (ALD) of single-element films is important for thin film device fabrication [1]. As component sizes shrink to nanometer dimensions, ultrathin metal films are necessary as diffusion barriers to prevent interlayer and dopant diffusion [2]. Conformal metal films are needed as conductors on high aspect ratio interconnect vias and memory trench capacitors [3]. The ALD of single-element semiconductor films may also facilitate the fabrication of quantum confinement photonic devices [4].
Currently, most thin metal films are formed by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. However, the CVD process often results in pin-holes, gaps and/or defects on the surface. Furthermore, the resulting thin metal film surface is often rough and has uneven metal film thickness.
While thin films of a variety of binary materials can be grown with atomic layer control using sequential self-limiting surface reactions [5,6], thin film of metal using ALD has not been successful achieved. For example, ALD technique has recently been employed to deposit a variety of binary materials including oxides [7-11], nitrides [12,13], sulfides [14,15] and phosphides [16]. In contrast, the atomic layer growth of single-element, e.g., metal, films has never been achieved using this approach. Earlier efforts to deposit copper with atomic layer control were unsuccessful because the surface chemistry was not self-limiting and the resulting copper films displayed coarse polycrystalline grains [17,18]. Previous attempts to achieve silicon ALD with sequential surface chemistry could not find a set of reactions that were both self-limiting [19]. Germanium ALD has been accomplished using self-limiting surface reactions only in conjunction with a temperature transient [20].
Therefore, there is a need for a method for forming a thin metal film layer on a solid material surface using a plurality of self-limiting reactions.
One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for forming a thin metal film layer on a solid substrate surface to produce a solid material having a thin metal film layer, wherein said method comprises:
Preferably, the solid substrate surface comprises a functional group which optionally can be activated to undergo the chemical reaction. For example, the solid substrate comprises a group selected from oxides, nitrides, metals, semiconductors, polymers with a functional group (e.g., a non-hydrocarbon moiety), and mixtures thereof. In one particular embodiment of the present invention, the solid substrate comprises hydroxides on its surface which serves as a site of further reaction to allow formation of a thin metal film. Such hydroxides can be generated, for example, by water plasma treatment of a solid substrate surface. Preferably, the solid substrate comprises a conducting, insulating or a semiconductor material.
In one particular embodiment of the present invention, the plurality of self-limiting reactions comprises a binary reaction. Preferably, the reagents used in the reactions are non-transient species, i.e., they can be isolated and stored. Preferably, the plurality of reactions involves using a reactant in a gaseous (e.g., vapor) state. Such reactant may be a liquid or preferably a solid having a relatively high vapor pressure. For a reactant which is non-gaseous material at ambient pressure and temperature, the vapor pressure of the reactant at 100° C. is at least about 0.1 torr, preferably at least about 1 torr, and more preferably at least about 100 torr.
Preferably, the plurality of self-limiting reactions use a metal halide and a metal halide reducing agent. Exemplary metal halides include halides of transition metals and halides of semiconductors. Preferred halide is fluoride. Exemplary transition metals and semiconductors which are useful in the present invention include tungsten, rhenium, molybdenum, antimony, selenium, thallium, chromium, platinum, ruthenium, iridium, and germanium. Preferred metal halide is halide of tungsten, more preferably tungsten hexafluoride. Exemplary metal halide reducing agents which are useful in the present invention include silylating agents, such as silane, disilane, trisilane, and mixtures thereof. Preferably, a metal halide reducing agent is selected from the group consisting of silane, disilane, trisilane, and mixtures thereof. More preferably, a metal halide reducing agent is disilane.
In one particular embodiment, a method for producing a thin film of metal on a surface of a solid substrate comprises:
The solid substrate surface can be contacted with a silylating agent prior to contacting with the metal halide to produce a surface having a silane group. This is particularly useful for solid substrate which comprises a hydroxide group, for example, silicon semiconductors having silicon dioxide (SiO2) top layer can be treated with appropriate chemicals and/or conditions to produce hydroxylated silicon surface which can then be contacted with silylating agent to produce a surface containing silane moieties.
By repeating the plurality of self-limiting reactions, thin metal film layer of various thickness can be achieved. Moreover, each complete cycle of the plurality of self-limiting reactions provides a metal film thickness which substantially corresponds to the atomic spacing of such metal. For example, the thickness of a tungsten monolayer is about 2.51 Å, and each complete cycle of the plurality of self-limiting reactions of the present invention which provides tungsten film results in a tungsten monolayer film of about 2.48 Å to about 2.52 Å. Thus, the total thickness of the metal film is directly proportional to the number of complete cycles of the plurality of self-limiting reactions.
A solid material produced by the present methods comprises a thin metal film layer, wherein the ratio of roughness of the solid substrate surface to roughness of the solid material surface with the thin metal film layer is from about 0.8 to about 1.2, preferably from about 0.9 to about 1.2, and more preferably from about 1 to about 1.2.
The roughness of a flat portion of the solid material is about 50% or less of roughness of a substantially same solid material produced by a chemical vapor deposition process or 50% or less of roughness of a substantially same solid material in a ballistic deposition model, preferably the roughness is about 40% or less, and more preferably about 30% or less. This percentage is expected to decrease as the thickness increases. The roughness of solid material produced by the present method should be substantially constant independent of the film thickness. In contrast, the roughness of the solid material produced by the CVD will generally depend on the square root of the thickness.
As stated above, while a variety of metal film thickness can be achieved by the methods of the present invention, a solid material having a tungsten film layer thickness of about 100 Å or less, preferably 50 Å or less, are particularly useful in a variety of electronic application. For a solid material having a tungsten film, the thickness of the tungsten film layer is substantially equal to 2.5 Å×n, where n is an integer and represents the number of complete cycles of the plurality of self-limiting reactions.
The present invention provides a novel method for producing a solid material comprising a solid substrate which has a thin metal film layer on its surface. The present invention is based on self-terminating surface reactions to achieve atomic layer control of thin metal film growth. As stated above, the present invention can be used to produce a variety of metal film layers on a solid substrate that comprises a functional group on its surface. In general, methods of the present invention rely on a reaction sequence where one reactant removes surface species without being incorporated in the film. This novel method facilitates the ALD of various metal, insulator and semiconductor single-element films. Methods of the present invention are particularly useful in producing a tungsten film on a conducting, insulating or semiconductive solid material; therefore, the present invention will be described in reference to the production of a tungsten film on a solid substrate comprising silicon, for example, silicon dioxide and/or silicon hydroxide, on its surface.
Thus, one particular embodiment of the present invention provides a method for producing single-element tungsten films using sequential self-limiting surface reactions at a constant temperature. To deposit tungsten with atomic layer control, methods of the present invention separate a CVD reaction, e.g.,
WF6(g)+Si2H6(g)→W(s)+2SiHF3 (g)+2H2(g)
into the following two self-limiting half-reactions:
*W—SiHyFz+WF6(g)→*W—WFx+SiHaFb(g) (1)
*WFx+Si2H6(g)→*W—SiHyFz+2H2(g)+SiHaFb(g) (2)
where the asterisks designate the surface species. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that there are several reaction pathways; therefore, the stoichiometry of the surface species and gas products is kept indefinite. Successive application of the WF6 and Si2H6 half-reactions (Equations 1 and 2, respectively) in an ABAB . . . binary reaction sequence (e.g., Eqns 1 and 2) produces W ALD having a various tungsten thickness depending on the number of binary reaction cycles.
Tungsten is a hard, refractory, relatively inert metal that has found widespread use in making filaments and filling contact holes and vias in microelectronic circuits [21]. The chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reaction has been used previously to deposit tungsten [22]. SiH4 has also been employed instead of Si2H6 [2,3,22–25]. In contrast, methods of the present invention separated this overall CVD reaction into a plurality of self-limiting reaction, specifically binary self-limiting reactions, i.e., two separate reactions each involving different chemistry.
The sequential self-limiting surface reactions and the atomic layer controlled growth of tungsten films can be monitored using a variety of techniques known to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, vibrational spectroscopic studies can be performed on high surface area silica powders using transmission Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) investigations. Briefly, FTIR spectroscopy can be used to measure the coverage of fluorine and silicon species during the WF6 and Si2H6 half-reactions. The tungsten films can be deposited on Si(100) substrates and examined using in situ spectroscopic ellipsometry. The ellipsometry measurements can be used to determine the tungsten film thickness and index of refraction versus deposition temperature and reactant exposure. Additional atomic force microscopy studies can be used to characterize the flatness of the tungsten films relative to the initial Si(100) substrate. The tungsten film properties can also be evaluated by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth-profiling to determine film stoichiometry and x-ray diffraction experiments to ascertain film structure.
Use of a sequential surface chemistry technique allows deposition of ultrathin and smooth tungsten films for thin film device fabrication. Thus, as FTIR difference spectra of
[24,25,32].
As shown in
The surface resulting from a complete WF6 half-reaction is then reacted with Si2H6.
It is believed that the overall role of the Si2H6 reactant in the sequential surface chemistry is only “sacrificial”, i.e., the final film does not contain the silane group from Si2H6. It is believed that the Si2H6 reduces the *WFx species, and the resulting *SiHyFz species is lost as a volatile SiHaFb reaction product during the next WF6 half-reaction. When the Si2H6 half-reaction reaches completion, the *SiHyFz coverage is equivalent to the *SiHyFz coverage measured after the previous Si2H6 half-reaction. Similarly, the loss of *SiHyFz coverage during the WF6 half-reaction results in the growth of *WFx coverage that becomes equivalent to the *WFx coverage measured after the previous WF6 half-reaction.
The dependence of the tungsten growth rate on the WF6 and Si2H6 reactant exposures can be examined by measuring the tungsten film thickness deposited on an underlying Si(100) substrate after 3 AB cycles at 425° K. The WF6 and Si2H6 reactant exposures can be controlled by performing various numbers of identical reactant pulses.
As shown in
WF6 and Si2H6 reactant exposures of 9 reactant pulses and 40 reactant pulses, respectively, are more than sufficient for complete half-reactions. The ellipsometric measurements of the tungsten film thickness versus number of AB cycles at 425°K, as shown in
The measured tungsten growth rate of 2.5 Å per AB cycle agrees with the expected thickness of a tungsten monolayer. The density of tungsten is ρ=19.3 g/cm3 or ρ=6.32×1022 atoms/cm3. Based on this density and assuming a simple cubic packing of tungsten atoms, the predicted thickness of a tungsten monolayer is ρ−1/3=2.51 Å. Likewise, the predicted coverage of tungsten atoms in one monolayer is ρ2/3 =1.59×1015 atoms/cm2.
The ellipsometric measurements also yield the refractive index (ñ=n+ik) for the tungsten films. This refractive index varies with film thickness. A refractive index of n=2.4±0.6 and k=0.8±0.3 was measured at a film thickness of 45 Å. The refractive index increases to n=3.66±0.41 and k=2.95±0.22 at film thicknesses of about 300 Å or higher. The measured optical constants for the thicker tungsten films compare well with literature values of n=3.6 and k=2.9 [33].
The ellipsometric measurements of the tungsten film thickness deposited by 3 AB reaction cycles versus substrate temperature are shown in
The surface topography of the deposited tungsten films can be examined using a Nanoscope III atomic force microscope (AFM) from Digital Instruments operating in tapping mode.
The tungsten film composition can also be evaluated using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth-profiling [36]. After sputtering through the surface region, the elemental concentrations in the tungsten film are constant until encountering the SiO2 layer on the Si(100) substrate. The tungsten films produced by methods of the present invention contained no measurable silicon or fluorine. These results show that Si2H6 reduces WFx* species, i.e., removes fluorine from WFx* species, and the resulting SiHyFz* species are subsequently removed by the next WF6 exposure.
Glancing angle X-ray diffraction experiments [36] can be used to evaluate the crystallographic structure of the tungsten films. Using Cu Kα radiation incident at 4°, the tungsten films produced by methods of the present invention resulted in a very broad 2θ diffraction peak widths (FWHM) of about 5°. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that these broad diffraction peaks indicate that the tungsten films are either amorphous [39] or are composed of very small crystalline grains. In addition, the adhesion of the tungsten films to the starting Si (100) substrate was examined using the “scratch and peel” tests [40]. The tungsten films survived these tests with no evidence of delamination.
The electrical resistivity of tungsten films with a thickness of about 320 Å was also measured using the four point probe technique with silver paint electrical contacts [41]. The electrical resistivity was determined to be 122 μΩ cm. In comparison, the resistivity is 5 μΩ cm for pure tungsten metal [42] and 16 μΩ cm for crystalline tungsten films grown using WF6+SiH4 chemical vapor deposition [39]. The higher resistivity of 122 μΩ cm is believed to be due to the amorphous structure of the tungsten film.
Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following examples thereof, which are not intended to be limiting.
This experiment is directed to FTIR Spectroscopy Studies of Silica Powder.
The FTIR spectroscopy experiments were performed in a high vacuum chamber built for in situ transmission FTIR spectroscopic investigations [27]. A schematic of this chamber is displayed in
High surface area silica powder was used to achieve sufficient surface sensitivity for the FTIR investigations. High surface area fumed silica powder was obtained from Aldrich. This silica powder had a surface area of 380 m2/g. The silica powder was pressed into an tungsten photoetched grid [28]. This tungsten grid from Buckbee-Mears was 0.002 inch thick and contained 100 lines per inch. The tungsten was then suspended between copper posts on the sample mount. This sample could be resistively heated to about 1000° K. A tungsten-rhenium thermocouple spot-welded to the grid provided accurate sample temperature measurement.
The FTIR spectrum of the silica powder recorded immediately after loading into vacuum exhibited a pronounced surface vibrational feature that extended from 3750 cm−1 to 3000 cm−1. This feature is attributed to SiOH* species [29]. To prepare the SiO2 surface for tungsten film deposition, the hydroxylated SiO2 (silanol) surface was first exposed to about 1 Torr of Si2H6 for 30 min at 650° K.
The negative absorbance features in
Additional FTIR difference spectra were utilized to measure the *WFx species and *SiHyFz species during the WF6 and Si2H6 half-reactions. The FTIR spectra were recorded at 340° K after various WF6 or Si2H6 exposures at different temperatures. Gate valves protected the CsI windows during the reactant exposures. The *WFx surface species were monitored using the W—F stretching mode located at about 680 cm−1 [24]. The surface silicon coverage was monitored using the Si—H stretch, Si—H scissors and Si—F stretch at about 2150, 910 and 830 cm−1, respectively [24,25,30,31].
This experiment is directed to Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Studies of Si(100).
The tungsten film growth experiments were performed in a high vacuum apparatus designed for ellipsometric investigations of thin film growth [7]. A schematic of this apparatus is shown in
The central deposition chamber is equipped with an in situ spectroscopic ellipsometer (J. A. Woolam Co. M-44). This ellipsometer collects data at 44 visible wavelengths simultaneously. The ellipsometer is mounted on ports positioned at 80° with respect to the surface normal. Gate valves protect the birefringent-free ellipsometer windows from deposition during the WF6 and Si2H6 exposures. The surface analysis chamber has a UTI-100C quadrupole mass spectrometer. This analysis chamber is pumped by a 210 l/s turbomolecular pump to obtain a base pressure of 1×10−9 Torr. Mass spectometric analysis of the gases in the central deposition chamber can be performed using a controlled leak to the surface analysis chamber.
The sample substrate for the ellipsometer studies was a Si(100) wafer covered with 125 Å of SiO2 formed by thermal oxidation. The Si(100) wafers were p-type boron-doped with a resistivity of p=0.01–0.03 Ω cm. Square pieces of the Si(100) wafer with dimensions of 0.75 in ×0.75 in were used as the samples. The highly-doped Si(100) samples were suspended between copper posts using 0.25 mm Mo foil and could be resistively heated to >1100 K. The sample temperature was determined by a Chromel-Alumel thermocouple pressed onto the SiO2 surface using a spring clip.
The Si(100) samples were cleaned with methanol, acetone and distilled water before mounting and loading into the chamber. The SiO2 surface was further cleaned in vacuum by an anneal at 900° K for 5 minutes. This thermal anneal was followed by a high frequency H2O plasma discharge at 300°K. This H2O plasma fully hydroxylated the SiO2 surface and removed surface carbon contamination.
To initiate the tungsten film growth, the hydroxylated SiO2 surface was first exposed to 10 mTorr of Si2H6 at 600° K for about 5 mins. FTIR spectroscopy indicates that Si2H6 reacts with the surface hydroxyl groups and deposits surface species containing Si—H stretching vibrations: e.g. *SiOH+Si2H6-+*SiOSiH3+SiH4. After the initial Si2H6 treatment, tungsten film growth could be performed at reaction temperatures between about 425° K to about 600° K. A few WF6 and Si2H6 reaction cycles were utilized to transform the SiO2 surface to a tungsten surface. The dependence of the tungsten growth rate on WF6 and Si2H6 reactant exposure was examined on this tungsten surface.
The WF6 and Si2H6 exposures were controlled by performing various numbers of identical reactant pulses. The WF6 or Si2H6 reactants were introduced by opening automated valves for a few milliseconds. These valve openings create small pressure transients in the deposition chamber. The total exposure of either the WF6 or Si2H6 reactant during one AB cycle was defined in terms of the number of identical reactant pulses. Between the WF6 and Si2H6 reactant exposures, the deposition chamber was purged with N2 for several minutes. The pressure transients were recorded with a baratron pressure transducer. The absolute reactant exposures were estimated from the pressure versus time waveform.
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. Although the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/124,532, filed Mar. 15, 1999.
The U.S. Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided for by the terms of Grant No. DAAG55-98-C-0036 awarded by DARPA, in conjunction with the U.S. Army Research Office and by the terms of a Grant No. F49620-99-1-0081 by Air Force Office of Scientific Research.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5175017 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5306666 | Izumi | Apr 1994 | A |
5681775 | Pogge | Oct 1997 | A |
5916365 | Sherman | Jun 1999 | A |
6040010 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066366 | Berenbaum et al. | May 2000 | A |
6143659 | Leem | Nov 2000 | A |
6174809 | Kang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200893 | Sneh | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6440541 | Humphrey et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6475276 | Elers et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60124532 | Mar 1999 | US |