The section headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and should not to be construed as limiting the subject matter described in the present application in any way.
Autonomous, self-driving, and semi-autonomous automobiles use a combination of different sensors and technologies such as radar, image-recognition cameras, and ultrasonic transducers for detection and location of surrounding objects. These sensors enable a host of improvements in driver safety including collision warning, automatic-emergency braking, lane-departure warning, lane-keeping assistance, adaptive cruise control, and piloted driving. Among these sensor technologies, light detection and ranging (LIDAR) systems take a critical role, enabling real-time, high-resolution three-dimensional mapping of the surrounding environment.
The present teaching, in accordance with preferred and exemplary embodiments, together with further advantages thereof, is more particularly described in the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The skilled person in the art will understand that the drawings, described below, are for illustration purposes only. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating principles of the teaching. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the Applicant's teaching in any way.
The present teaching will now be described in more detail with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof as shown in the accompanying drawings. While the present teaching is described in conjunction with various embodiments and examples, it is not intended that the present teaching be limited to such embodiments. On the contrary, the present teaching encompasses various alternatives, modifications and equivalents, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art. Those of ordinary skill in the art having access to the teaching herein will recognize additional implementations, modifications, and embodiments, as well as other fields of use, which are within the scope of the present disclosure as described herein.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the teaching. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
It should be understood that the individual steps of the method of the present teaching can be performed in any order and/or simultaneously as long as the teaching remains operable. Furthermore, it should be understood that the apparatus and method of the present teaching can include any number or all of the described embodiments as long as the teaching remains operable.
The majority of commercially available LIDAR systems used for autonomous vehicles today utilize a small number of lasers, combined with some method of mechanically scanning the environment. It is highly desirable for current automotive applications and future autonomous automotive applications to utilize solid-state semiconductor-based LIDAR systems. Solid-state LIDAR systems, particularly those with no moving parts, exhibit better reliability and can operate over wider environmental operating ranges compared to current LIDAR systems. Such solid-state systems for use in the LIDAR systems can also be physically compact and relatively low in cost.
One approach to solid-state LIDAR is to use a large number of lasers projecting each laser at a unique angle over the desired FOV, thereby avoiding the need for mechanical scanning. However, electrically connecting the driver circuits to large numbers of lasers, while retaining the ability to individually operate them is a challenge. One solution is to arrange the plurality of lasers into a 2D matrix, and then employing a matrix-addressable laser drive circuit that can simultaneously meet the need to control individual and/or groups of lasers in the array and to provide the optimal electrical characteristics (e.g. current, voltage and timing) to energize the lasers. The methods and apparatus of the present teaching relates to laser control method and system architectures that enable individual control of a 2D matrix of lasers, while ensuring a low-cost system.
The optical beams from the lasers in the laser array 102 share the transmitter optics 104 that project the optical beams 106 to a target 108 at a target plane 110. Portions of the light from the incident optical beams 106 are reflected by the target 108. Portions of the reflected optical beams 112 share the receiver optics 114. A detector array 116 receives the reflected light that is projected by the receiver optics 114. In various embodiments, the detector array 116 is solid-state with no moving parts. The detector array 116 can have a fewer number of individual detector elements than the transmitter array 102 has individual lasers.
The measurement resolution of the LIDAR system 100 is not determined by the size of the detector elements in the detector array 116, but instead by the number of lasers in the transmitter array 102 and the collimation of the individual optical beams. A processor (not shown) in the LIDAR system 100 performs a time-of-flight (TOF) measurement that determines a distance to a target 108 that reflects the optical beams 106 from the lasers in the laser array 102 as detected at the detector array 116.
One feature of the systems of the present teaching is that individual lasers and/or groups of lasers, in the transmitter array 102 can be individually controlled. Another feature of the systems of the present teaching is that individual detectors and/or groups of detectors in the detector array 116 can be individually controlled. This control provides for various desired performance characteristics, including control of field-of-view, optical power levels, scanning and/or other features.
It can be seen in
In some embodiments, the field-of-view of an individual detector in the detector array is the active area of a detector. The individual detector size within the array is largely determined by the electrical characteristics of the device. For example, as the size of the active area of an avalanche photodiode (APD) detector increases, the capacitance of the detector increases, reducing the optical-electrical bandwidth of the device. The bandwidth of the APD must be maintained high enough to not attenuate or distort the received signal. Typical values for the Optical-to-Electrical (O/E) bandwidth and APD capacitance in a LIDAR system with laser pulse widths<10 nsec and having a rise/fall time of ˜1 nsec, are 350 MHz, and less than 2 pF, respectively. In general, to cover the full field-of-view of the LIDAR system while maintaining acceptable electrical detector performance, an array of detectors must be used. The overall physical size and dimensions of the array are determined by the required field-of-view and the specifications of the optical lens system of the receiver.
Emission apertures 202 are formed in the bottom contact 218 to allow the output light 214 to emerge from the bottom, substrate side of the bottom-emitting VCSEL 200. Note that only one emission aperture 202 is shown in
In some embodiments, VCSEL arrays used in the solid-state LIDAR systems of the present teaching are monolithic and the lasers all share a common substrate on which the lasers are integrated. A variety of common substrate types can be used. For example, the common substrate may be a semiconductor material. The common substrate may also include a ceramic material. In other embodiments, a 2D VCSEL array is assembled from a group of 1D bars or even individual die.
In some embodiments, the VCSELs are top-emitting VCSEL devices. In other embodiments, the VCSEL devices are bottom-emitting VCSELS. The individual VCSEL devices may have either a single large emission aperture, or the individual VCSEL devices may be formed from two or more sub-apertures within a larger effective emission diameter. A group of sub-apertures forming a larger effective emission region is sometimes referred to as a cluster.
Some embodiments of the present teaching utilize bottom-emitting high-power arrays of VCSEL devices with a single large aperture per laser, such as the configuration shown in
Two-dimensional VCSEL arrays can be used as building blocks for the LIDAR systems according to the present teaching to establish a platform that allows a small physical size for the transmitter. For example, a 2D VCSEL array with 256 high-power individual lasers can be constructed on a monolithic chip that is approximately 4 mm×4 mm. Such monolithic chips can be used together with optics that are chosen to keep the physical dimension as small as possible, for example, through the use of micro-lens arrays, shared lenses of dimension less than 20 mm, or diffractive optics of maximum dimension of about 20 mm.
However, the LIDAR systems according to the present teaching put certain requirements on the 2D VCSEL arrays. In particular, it is desirable that the 2D VCSEL arrays allow for simultaneous control of all VCSEL devices independently. In some modes of operation of the LIDAR system of the present teaching, each VCSEL within a matrix is fired at a different time. For such operation, the VCSEL array needs to be operated in a matrix-addressable fashion where lasers can be fired individually, but not always simultaneously.
In one embodiment, the solid state LIDAR system of the present teaching uses VCSEL devices that are assembled using heterogeneous integration techniques. For example, these devices can be flip-chip bonded to silicon electronics to provide a highly compact method of connecting to and electrically driving the VCSEL. See, for example, Plant et al., “256-Channel Bidirectional Optical Interconnect Using VCSELs and Photodiodes on CMOS”, IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 19, No. 8, August 2001. See also, U.S. Pat. No. 7,702,191, entitled “Electro-Optical Chip Assembly” and U.S. Pat. No. 8,675,706, entitled “Optical Illuminator that Fire Devices in Parallel”. However, these known heterogeneous integration techniques have largely been directed to applications in the optical communication market where simultaneous parallel operation of multiple-channels are desired as a solution to increase data transmission throughput.
The matrix-addressable laser drive circuit for a 2D laser array 500 is configured so that the VCSEL devices 502 are connected to the anodes 504, 504′, 504″, 504′″. The rows of VCSEL devices 502 are connected by the cathodes 506, 506′, 506″, 506′″. This anode-column and cathode-row connection configuration illustrated in the schematic 500 allows the individual lasers 502 to be turned on/off through operation of rows and columns, rather than needing individual access to the cathode and anode of a single laser 502.
In an alternative embodiment of the circuit shown in
One feature of the laser array controller of the present teaching is that it can use a variety of laser drive circuits to provide desired laser drive characteristics. In some embodiments, the power supply 548 driving the lasers generates high-current, short duration pulses. In these embodiments, the power supply 548 is designed to provide the necessary high-current and short-duration pulses. Also, the matrix can be operated by having the power supply 548 apply a potential waveform with a defined voltage (so-called voltage driver) or a current waveform with a defined current level (so-called current driver).
In some embodiments, the power supply 548 is configured to produce a waveform that reduces the power dissipation when a pulse is not being generated. This can be achieved, for example, by using a circuit configuration that provides a near or total shut down of the output of the power supply 548 during the down time between the applications of short-duration pulses. In one such embodiment, the power supply energizes the laser driver during a wake-up period before the short-duration pulse is generated and then the pulse is generated. The power supply 548 produces a waveform shut-down for a time between pulses that is initiated after the pulse has been fired. This waveform shut-down period is proceeded by a wake-up period before the short duration pulse is generated again. Some power supplies also have a “lower power” state that is used to further reduce power consumption. For example, in practical implementations, a controller in the power supply or a separate controller can execute a series of commands, such as the following commands: (1) put laser driver power supply in a “low power state”; (2) put laser driver power supply in “wake-up” mode; (3) turn laser driver power supply output “on”; (4) turn laser driver power supply output “off”; and (5) return laser driver to “low power state”.
The configuration of the matrix-addressable laser drive circuit 590 is similar to the alternative embodiment of the circuit shown in
An optical pulse is generated only when the column drive signal 595 and the row drive signal 596 are both high. The row drive signal's pulse duration determines the optical pulse width. The duty cycle depends upon various operating parameters. For example, in one method of operation, duty cycle of the optical pulses is 1%. The column drive signal 595 pulse is longer than the row drive signal 596 pulse. This prevents racing between the row and column pulses.
One important feature of the methods and apparatus of the present teaching is that various laser driver circuit configurations and methods of operation reduce cross talk and, therefore increase performance. Referring to the matrix-addressable laser drive circuit 590 described in connection with
The asymmetric, on-off driver circuit 600 is suitable for injecting a well-controlled, short duration, high-bias-current pulse into the laser junction 610 to energize the laser and cause it to emit light. For a pulsed TOF LIDAR system, the ideal optical power output pulse should be in the few-nanoseconds duration range and should provide a high peak output power for that duration. In some embodiments, the asymmetric, on-off driver circuit 600 is configured and operated so that the peak output power from a laser is at or minimally below the eye safe limit.
One feature of the present teaching is that the array drive control circuit can be configured to optimize the drive based on the characteristics of a current-voltage (IV) curve of the laser emitters.
When the laser diode is reversed biased where the voltage at the cathode is positive with respect to the anode, the laser diode blocks current flow except for an extremely small leakage current. The laser diode continues to block current flow until the reverse voltage across the diode becomes greater than its breakdown voltage (Vbr 712). Once breakdown is reached, the current will increase exponentially in the negative direction, and since the voltage and current are relatively high, the self-power dissipation is also relatively high, and the laser diode consequently will overheat and burn itself out. Light is generated from the laser in forward bias conditions.
The current-voltage behavior of each individual laser, combined with the method of controlling the laser drive to energize individual lasers, significantly affects the operating performance and reliability of the laser array. One feature of the matrix-addressable laser drive circuits of the present teaching is that they can be configured to minimize detrimental effects, such as optical cross-talk. Optical cross-talk occurs when other lasers in the array, other than the single laser which is being intentionally forward biased to energize, are forward biased at the same time because of current and or voltage leakage from the electrical drive supplied to the energized laser. As a result, the other lasers emit light, even though this emission is not desired. Such an optical cross-talk situation has a detrimental effect on the performance of the LIDAR system by virtue of illuminating measurement points that were not intended to be illuminated and/or illuminating a wider target area then intended.
In the case in which the value of the supply voltage 804 is less than a reverse breakdown voltage of a laser pulse, the forward voltage drop of the laser, i.e. the absolute value of V+ is less than the sum of Vbr and Vth, there will be almost no reverse current flowing through the laser diodes. Such a condition improves device reliability. Also, if the voltage at a cathode is less than the threshold voltage, i.e. V<Vth, there will be almost no forward current flowing through the diodes on the same row as the active laser 814.
As described previously, one aspect of the LIDAR system of the present teaching is the ability to individually energize each VCSEL located within a 2D matrix-addressable configuration in a laser array with a minimum number of required electrical drivers. When the array is driven in a matrix-addressable manner, by row/column, the minimum required number of drivers is equal to M+N where M is the number of columns and N is the number of rows, respectively. In contrast, if each VCSEL device within the array had its own dedicated driver, then the number of drivers would be much higher, equal to M×N. For example, a 16×16 element VCSEL array using matrix-addressing described herein requires only 32 drivers, compared to 256 drivers if each VCSEL had its own dedicated driver.
It is understood that with matrix addressing, completely independent operation of all lasers at the same time is not achievable. In other words, only certain lasers can be energized at a given time. However, this constraint is not significant for the LIDAR systems described herein, since in typical operation, only one laser within a specific monolithic array is energized at a time in order to have no ambiguity about which measurement point in space is being illuminated. Energizing one laser within a specific monolithic array at a time is also useful for maintaining Class 1 Eye Safety.
It is further understood that matrix addressing is well known in the electronic art. However, the use of aspects of matrix addressing in LIDAR systems that require short duration, very-high-optical-power pulses, with low duty cycle was not previously known. A LIDAR system with 256 lasers as described, operating out to 100 m (1 μsec minimum time between pulses), would have a duty cycle of only 0.002% with a 5 nsec pulse duration. Matrix addressing has been used to energize optical communication laser devices which typically operate with relatively low peak power (mW compared to W) and relatively longer duration pulses, and duty cycle of ˜50%. Under these conditions, the electrical drive requirements are very different from the operation of high-power lasers in a state-of-the art LIDAR application.
For example, pulsed TOF LIDAR system intended for greater than 100-m range operation using a 905-nm wavelength laser will typically require optical pulses with peak power in excess of 20 Watts and a pulse time duration of less than 10 nanoseconds. The corresponding drive voltage and current on the individual laser is in the 10's of Volts range, and the 10's of Amps range assuming the laser device has 1 W/A efficiency under pulsed conditions. Of course, with voltages greater than 10 V being applied to the matrix addressable array, there exists a significantly possibility of unwanted electrical and optical cross-talk. There is also a significant possibility that the VCSEL devices in the matrix can be damage or destroyed when reverse bias conditions exist with such voltages.
One of the primary factors affecting the reliability of the laser is the temperature of the device, both average and transient. If the pulse energy is controlled to keep the transient temperature rise of the device low enough, then the peak current and voltage values can be relatively high, as long as the duration of the pulse is short enough. Even in reverse bias conditions, where thermal runaway is an important concern, transient reverse current can be acceptable for reliability as long as the temperature rise in the vicinity of the junction is low enough. For example, assuming the material properties of GaAs for specific heat and density, a pulse of 1 μJ into a junction 2 microns thick, and 100 microns in diameter, would result in a temperature rise of ˜9° C. for that junction. A 20V/10 A square pulse of 5 nsec in duration is equivalent to 1 μJ energy. The resulting transient temperature rise will be on the order of only a few degrees and thus will likely not be sufficient to degrade the reliability of the device.
However, there exists the possibility of a second current path besides the primary path of solid line 1012. This second current path is indicated by the dashed line 1024 with directional arrows. When V+ on bus 1006 is applied to Column 21004 by closing switches 1026, 1028, the VCSEL device 1016 L12 will have V+ on bus 1006 applied at the Anode, and the voltage denoted V′ 1030 will be induced at the cathode in order to satisfy the condition that this path is nominally an open circuit, where no current can flow. Note that when voltage V+ on bus 1006 is initially applied to Column 21004, the voltage V′ 1030 could initially be zero. When this occurs, there is a possibility of a transient current with enough forward voltage of VCSEL device L121016 and L221018 to cause it to emit undesired light which results in optical cross-talk. In this situation, the cross talk is additional undesired light produced within the field-of-view that is not light generated by VCSEL device L221002.
It follows as a result of the cathodes being connected in a given row, that voltage V′ 1030 will also be applied to the cathode of VCSEL device L111014 and this will immediately put VCSEL device L111014 into a reverse bias condition. The voltage V″ 1032 will be induced at the anode of VCSEL device L111014 in order to satisfy current/voltage relationships. If the voltage V′ 1030 is less than the reverse breakdown voltage of L111014, then the current flow is typically less than 1 μA. The small current flowing through L111014 will also flow through L211018 putting it in forward bias condition. Voltage V″ will correspond to the forward IV curve of L211018. To avoid light being emitted from L21, the current through L211018 should be lower than the laser threshold current, which could be expected to be in the range of 10 to 100 mA for the LIDAR application.
However, if the voltage V′ 1030 is greater than the breakdown voltage of VCSEL device L111014, then a much higher current will flow through the circuit. If this current is above the threshold current for L211018 then light will be generated in both VCSEL device L121016 and VCSEL device L211018, which results in the generation of undesired optical cross-talk. Thus, it is understood that voltage V′ 1030 cannot be arbitrarily large, but instead must be constrained in order that either it is always less than the reverse breakdown voltage of a VCSEL device or at least that the current flow through the corresponding path is not sufficient to cause light to emit from these two VCSEL devices, L121016 and L211018.
Thus, one aspect of the present teaching is the realization that it is desirable to constrain the voltage V′ 1030 to be less than the reverse breakdown voltage for the particular VCSEL device that is used for LIDAR applications in order to avoid undesired optical cross-talk. In addition, sustained current flow under reverse bias conditions is undesirable because it can be a potential reliability issue for laser diodes depending on the time, energy associated with the current flow, and the resulting thermal rise in the laser diode among other factors.
Under operating conditions where voltage V′ 1030 results in significant transient current flow through devices 1014, 1016, and 1018, the pulse energy should be low enough to not significantly impact the reliability, and the transient temperature rise in these devices should be less than 20° C.
Using many known VCSEL device structures for LIDAR applications will result in the generation of undesired optical cross-talk because voltages of 10V-80V are typically required to generate the high power optical pulses required for state-of-the-art LIDAR applications, while the reverse breakdown voltage for a typical VCSEL device with a single active region is in the range of 5V to 15V.
Thus, another aspect of LIDAR systems using the matrix-addressable control circuits according to the present teaching to drive laser arrays for LIDAR applications is the design of the VCSEL device itself to have desirable operating specifications that reduce or illuminate optical cross talk and while having high reliability. That is, VCSEL devices according to the present teaching are specifically designed such that the operating conditions prevent unwanted optical cross-talk from impacting system performance. One way of the preventing unwanted optical cross-talk is to fabricate the VCSEL devices with laser structures that can achieve relatively high reverse bias operating conditions without going into breakdown condition.
One possible laser structure that can increase Vth or Vbr, or both, includes multiple junctions in series within the VCSEL device. A laser structure with multiple junctions in series has been demonstrated in devices using tunnel junctions that separate the active junctions. It should be understood that numerous other similar laser structures with multiple junctions can be used. Although using multiple junctions will increase the Vth, since the pulse voltages and currents are high, the impact on efficiency and device performance is typically acceptable for this application.
In operation, when the two switches 1132, 1134 are closed, a laser drive current flows through the path 1130 shown with a bold line in the direction indicated by the arrows. The second diodes 1110, 1112, 1114, 1116 will increase the forward voltage drop between the column and row anode and cathode connections. However, since the typical forward voltage drop of a GaAs laser diode is about 2V to 3V, and is about 1V to 2V for a silicon diode, the additional forward voltage drop is not significant since the matrix-address laser drive circuit 1100 is designed to generate high optical power from each laser so it typically operates at drive voltages in excess of 10V. As such, this additional forward voltage drop does not have a major impact on performance. In some embodiments, more than one additional diode is added in series with the laser diode.
Different embodiments use different diode types to implement the second diode 1110, 1112, 1114, 1116 connected in series, or multiple additional diodes connected in series. For example, some embodiments stack a second diode 1110, 1112, 1114, 1116 monolithically with the respective laser 1102, 1104, 1106, 1108 within a chip. The chip may be a GaAs chip, similar to that shown in
VCSEL devices with stacked or cascaded multiple-diode regions are known in the art. See, for example, “Bipolar Cascade VCSEL with 130% Differential Quantum Efficiency”, Annual Report 2000, Optoelectronics Department, University of ULM. Also, multi-diode cascade VCSEL structures have been used to increase overall brightness. See, for example, U.S. Patent Publication No. US2015/0311673A1. Also, VCSEL have been fabricated with integrated photodiodes. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,717,972. However, the prior art does not teach matrix-address laser drive circuit 1100 configured for LIDAR application using such structures.
Another VCSEL device structure according to the present teaching that achieves relatively high reverse bias operating conditions without going into breakdown condition serially connects two or more VCSEL devices in a single laser emitter configuration. This can be accomplished by appropriate routing of the anode and cathode connections in the chip fabrication process.
It is common in high-power VCSEL lasers to have more than one-emitter aperture connected in parallel within a single emitter. For example, the VCSEL array described in connection with
Another VCSEL device structure according to the present teaching that achieves relatively high reverse bias operating conditions without going into breakdown condition incorporates an additional diode into a companion substrate or IC that is bonded to the VCSEL device.
The carrier 1208 can be electrically connected to the array 1202 in various ways. For example, the carrier 1208 can be electrically bonded to the array 1202 using bump bond connectors 1210. In the configuration shown in
While the Applicant's teaching is described in conjunction with various embodiments, it is not intended that the Applicant's teaching be limited to such embodiments. On the contrary, the Applicant's teaching encompasses various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, which may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the teaching.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/841,930, filed on Apr. 7, 2020, entitled “Solid-State LIDAR Transmitter with Laser Control”, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/831,668, filed on Apr. 9, 2019, entitled “Solid-State LIDAR Transmitter with Laser Control”. The entire contents of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/841,930, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/831,668 are all herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5552893 | Akasu | Sep 1996 | A |
5909296 | Tsacoyeanes | Jun 1999 | A |
6061001 | Sugimoto | May 2000 | A |
6353502 | Marchant et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6680788 | Roberson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6717972 | Steinle et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6775480 | Goodwill | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788715 | Leeuwen et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6829439 | Sidorovich et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6860350 | Beuhler et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888871 | Zhang et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7065112 | Ghosh et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7110183 | von Freyhold et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7544945 | Tan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7652752 | Fetzer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7702191 | Geron et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7746450 | Willner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7969558 | Hall | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8072581 | Breiholz | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8115909 | Behringer et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8247252 | Gauggel et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8301027 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8576885 | van Leeuwen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8675181 | Hall | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8675706 | Seurin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8783893 | Seurin et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8824519 | Seurin et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
9038883 | Wang et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9048633 | Gronenborn et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9268012 | Ghosh et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9285477 | Smith et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9348018 | Eisele et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9360554 | Retterath et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9378640 | Mimeault et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9392259 | Borowski | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9516244 | Borowski | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9520696 | Wang et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9553423 | Chen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9560339 | Borowski | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9574541 | Ghosh et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9575184 | Gilliland et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9658322 | Lewis | May 2017 | B2 |
9674415 | Wan et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9841495 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9933513 | Dussan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9946089 | Chen et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9989406 | Pacala et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
9989629 | LaChapelle | Jun 2018 | B1 |
9992477 | Pacala et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10063849 | Pacala et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10191156 | Steinberg et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10488492 | Hamel et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10514444 | Donovan | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10761195 | Donovan | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20020117340 | Stettner | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030043363 | Jamieson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030147652 | Green et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040120717 | Clark et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040228375 | Ghosh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050025211 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050232628 | von Freyhold et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060231771 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070071056 | Chen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070177841 | Dazinger | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070181810 | Tan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080074640 | Walsh et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090027651 | Pack et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100046953 | Shaw et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100215066 | Mordaunt et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100271614 | Alburquerque et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100302528 | Hall | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110176567 | Joseph | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20130163626 | Seurin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130163627 | Seurin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130208256 | Mamidipudi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208753 | van Leeuwen et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140043309 | Go et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049610 | Hudman et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140071427 | Last | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140139467 | Ghosh et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140218898 | Seurin et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247841 | Seurin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140303829 | Lombrozo et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333995 | Seurin et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140376092 | Mor | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150055117 | Pennecot et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150069113 | Wang et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150097947 | Hudman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150131080 | Retterath et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150160341 | Akatsu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150219764 | Donovan | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150255955 | Wang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150260830 | Ghosh et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150260843 | Lewis | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150311673 | Wang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150340841 | Joseph | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150362585 | Ghosh et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150377696 | Shpunt et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150378023 | Royo Royo et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160072258 | Seurin et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080077 | Joseph et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160161600 | Eldada et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160254638 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160266242 | Gilliland et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160306358 | Kang et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160348636 | Ghosh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170003392 | Bartlett et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170059838 | Tilleman | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170115497 | Chen et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170131387 | Campbell et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170131388 | Campbell et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170153319 | Villeneuve et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170168162 | Jungwirth | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170176579 | Niclass et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170219426 | Pacala et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256915 | Ghosh et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170285169 | Holz | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170289524 | Pacala et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170299722 | Gong et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170307736 | Donovan | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170307758 | Pei et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170353004 | Chen et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170356740 | Ansari et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180058923 | Lipson et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180074198 | Von Novak et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180107221 | Droz et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180113208 | Bergeron et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180128920 | Keilaf et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180152691 | Pacala et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180167602 | Pacala et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180180720 | Pei et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180180722 | Pei et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180203247 | Chen et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180209841 | Pacala et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180259623 | Donovan | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180259624 | Kiehn et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180269646 | Welford et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180301874 | Burroughs et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180301875 | Burroughs | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190018115 | Schmitt et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190036308 | Carson et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190049662 | Thomsen et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190056497 | Pacala et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190098233 | Gassend et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190146071 | Donovan | May 2019 | A1 |
20190170855 | Keller et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190302246 | Donovan et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200018835 | Cepton | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200041614 | Donovan et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200081101 | Donovan | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200200874 | Donovan | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200209355 | Pacala | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200278426 | Dummer | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200326425 | Donovan et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200379088 | Donovan et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200386868 | Donovan et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200408908 | Donovan | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210033708 | Fabiny | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101013030 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101545582 | Sep 2009 | CN |
103633557 | Mar 2014 | CN |
197 17 399 | Jun 1999 | DE |
102019005059 | Feb 2020 | DE |
1444696 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1569007 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2656099 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2656106 | Dec 2011 | EP |
3168641 | Apr 2016 | EP |
3497477 | Aug 2016 | EP |
2656100 | Oct 2016 | EP |
3526625 | Nov 2016 | EP |
3 159 711 | Apr 2017 | EP |
7-253460 | Oct 1995 | JP |
2003258359 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-536061 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2004-94115 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2007-214564 | Aug 2007 | JP |
4108478 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2009-103529 | May 2009 | JP |
2009-204691 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010-91855 | Apr 2010 | JP |
5096008 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2016-146417 | Aug 2016 | JP |
2019-509474 | Apr 2019 | JP |
6865492 | Apr 2021 | JP |
10-2014-0138724 | Dec 2014 | KR |
10-2018-0049937 | May 2018 | KR |
10-2018-0064969 | Jun 2018 | KR |
99-42856 | Aug 1999 | WO |
2013107709 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2014014838 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2015040671 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2018028795 | Feb 2018 | WO |
2018082762 | May 2018 | WO |
2018169758 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018166609 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018166610 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018166611 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2018169758 | Sep 2018 | WO |
2019-064062 | Apr 2019 | WO |
2019115148 | Jun 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Plant, et al., 256-Channel Bidirectional Optical Interconnect Using VCSELs and Photodiodes on CMOS, IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, Aug. 2001, pp. 1093-1103, vol. 19, No. 8. |
Knodl, et al., Bipolar Cascade VCSEL with 130% Differential Quantum Efficiency, Annual Report 2000, Optoelectronics Department, University of ULM, pp. 11-14. |
R.A. Morgan, et al., Two-Dimensional Matrix Addressed Vertical Cavity Top-Surface Emitting Laser Array Display, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Aug. 1994, pp. 913-917, vol. 6, No. 8. |
M. Orenstein, et al., Matrix Addressable Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser Array, Electronics Letters, Feb. 28, 1991, pp. 437-438, vol. 27, No. 5. |
K.M. Geib, et al., Fabrication and Performance of Two-Dimensional Matrix Addressable Arrays of Integrated Vertical-Cavity Lasers and Resonant Cavity Photodetectors, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics In Quantum Electronics, Jul./Aug. 2002, pp. 943-947, vol. 8, No. 4. |
Moench, et al., VCSEL Based Sensors for Distance and Velocity, Vertical Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers XX, Edited by K. Choquette, J. Guenter, Proc Of SPIE, 2016, 11 pages, vol. 9766, 07660A. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/026964, dated Jul. 28, 2020, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/026964, dated Oct. 21, 2021, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210231806 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62831668 | Apr 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16841930 | Apr 2020 | US |
Child | 17227300 | US |