1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to an apparatus for controlling the flow of process gases within a process chamber.
2. Description of the Related Art
When processing substrates in a vacuum, a vacuum pump is used to evacuate the processing chamber to the appropriate processing pressure. In some cases, the vacuum pump will continually evacuate processing gases introduced into the processing chamber to maintain a desired processing pressure. The vacuum pump will pull the processing gases through the processing chamber to the vacuum pump port leading to the vacuum pump.
Processing gases, such as deposition gases, are introduced into the processing chamber and, during processing, may lead to deposition on exposed chamber components. Deposition on undesired chamber components may lead to component failure or substrate contamination during processing. When a component fails, the component will need to either be cleaned or replaced. In either case, the processing chamber will need to be shut down to access the component, which leads to a decrease in substrate throughput.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for a processing chamber designed to reduce chamber component failure.
The present invention generally comprises a method and an apparatus for guiding the flow of processing gases away from chamber walls and slit valve opening. By controlling the flow path of the process gases within a processing chamber, undesirable deposition upon chamber walls and within slit valve openings may be reduced. By reducing deposition in slit valve openings, flaking may be reduced. By reducing deposition on chamber walls, the time between chamber cleaning may be increased. Thus, guiding the flow of processing gases within the processing chamber may increase substrate throughput.
In one embodiment, an apparatus includes a chamber body having a slit valve opening through a first sidewall, one or more flow guiders coupled with one or more sidewalls of the chamber body, one or more flow blockers coupled to and extending from the first sidewall above the slit valve opening, and a door movable between a position covering the slit valve opening and a second position. The one or more flow blockers are coupled to a flow guider having an opening therethrough that substantially aligns with the slit valve opening.
In another embodiment, an apparatus includes a plurality of flow guiders extending from processing chamber walls to enclose a processing area between a susceptor and a gas distribution showerhead. A first of the plurality of flow guiders have an opening therethrough to permit a substrate to pass therethrough. The apparatus also includes one or more flow blockers coupled with the first flow guider and extending away from the processing area and one or more doors movable from a position blocking the opening to a position clear of the opening. The first flow guider is disposed between the one or more doors and the processing area.
In another embodiment, an apparatus includes a chamber body having a plurality of sidewalls with an opening formed through a first sidewall. The apparatus also includes a flow guider coupled with the first sidewall. The flow guider has an opening therethrough that is substantially aligned with the opening in the first sidewall. The apparatus further includes a flow blocker coupled between the first sidewall and the flow guider over the slit valve opening. The flow blocker spans a length greater than the slit valve opening. The apparatus also includes a susceptor disposed in the chamber body such that an outer surface of the flow guider is aligned with a side of the susceptor.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements disclosed in one embodiment may be beneficially utilized on other embodiments without specific recitation.
The present invention generally comprises a method and an apparatus for guiding the flow of processing gases away from chamber walls and slit valve opening. By controlling the flow path of the process gases within a processing chamber, undesirable deposition upon chamber walls and within slit valve openings may be reduced. By reducing deposition in slit valve openings, flaking may be reduced. By reducing deposition on chamber walls, the time between chamber cleaning may be increased. Thus, guiding the flow of processing gases within the processing chamber may increase substrate throughput.
The invention will be illustratively described below in relation to a PECVD chamber available from AKT America, Inc., a subsidiary of Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, Calif. It is to be understood that the invention is equally applicable to any chamber that utilizes a processing gas including physical vapor deposition (PVD) chambers. It is also to be understood that the invention described below is equally applicable to PECVD chambers and other chambers sold by other vendors.
Once in the processing space 116, the processing gas and hence, the plasma, may disperse and come into contact with all exposed surfaces of the processing chamber. The vacuum pump may pull the plasma and the processing gas below the susceptor 104 as shown by arrows “A”. Additionally, the plasma may be drawn near the slit valve 122 as shown by arrow “B” and deposit on the slit valve 122. Material deposited on the slit valve 122 may flake off due to the opening and closing of the slit valve 122 during substrate 106 insertion and removal. Additionally, material may deposit in the chamber areas below the susceptor 104 and into the vacuum pump which may affect the lifetime of the vacuum pump and the various connections between the vacuum pump and the apparatus 100.
The processing gas may not be adequately contained to an area near the substrate 106 and thus, may disperse throughout the processing chamber. The processing gas may, due to the size of the processing chamber, not be evenly distributed across the substrate 106 which may lead to uneven processing of the substrate 106.
In order to reduce unwanted deposition and ensure a more uniform distribution of processing gas to the substrate, one or more flow blockers and/or one or more flow guiders may be used.
The flow guiders 224 may have a gap between adjacent flow guiders 224. Process gas, and in some cases, plasma, may flow through the gaps as the vacuum is drawn and maintained. The flow guiders 224 may be grounded to act as an anode during processing. In one embodiment, the height of the flow guiders 224 may be greater than the distance between the substrate 206 and the bottom surface of the showerhead 210 such that the processing gas that comes through the showerhead 210 is substantially concentrated within the processing area and thereby minimizing the amount of plasma and processing gas that may disperse to the chamber walls 208 and other areas where deposition is undesired. Additionally, the outside edge of the flow guiders 224 may be substantially aligned with the outer edge of the susceptor 204 such that the outside surface of the flow guiders 224 and the outside edge of the susceptor 204 lie in substantially the same vertical plane. In another embodiment, the height of the flow guiders 224 may be substantially equal to the distance between the substrate 206 and the bottom surface of the showerhead 210. In another embodiment, the height of the flow guiders 224 may be less than the distance between the substrate 206 and the bottom surface of the showerhead 210.
The flow of the plasma and process gas within the chamber may be substantially confined within the processing area bounded on the sides by the flow guiders 224. By confining as much of the processing gas as possible in between the substrate 206, the flow guiders 224, and the showerhead 210, the plasma uniformity may be increased and consistent deposition may occur on a substrate to substrate basis. Additionally, because the flow guiders 224 may be grounded, the amount of plasma that creeps under the susceptor 204 may be reduced. The space between the susceptor 204 and the flow guiders 224 shown by arrows “D” may be sufficient to pull processing gas therethrough, but sufficiently small to ensure that any plasma that may pass through the gap may be grounded and thus extinguished before flowing below the susceptor 204. The vacuum pump may pull the processing gas through the gaps between the flow guiders 224 and the space between the flow guiders 224 and the susceptor 204 as shown by arrows “C”. The flow guiders 224 may be spaced from the susceptor 204. In one embodiment, the flow guiders 236 may be coupled with the susceptor 204 in select locations to permit the processing gas to be pulled through the processing area and between the flow guiders 236 and the susceptor 204. The flow guiders 224 will also be spaced from the substrate 206 when the substrate 206 is in the processing position as shown by arrows “E”. In one embodiment, the distance between the susceptor 204 and the flow guiders 224 may be substantially identical to the distance between the substrate 206 and the flow guiders 224 when the substrate 206 is in the processing position.
One or more flow blockers 228 may be disposed over the space between the slit valve opening 222 and the flow guider 224 that is adjacent to the slit valve opening 222 to reduce the amount of plasma and processing gas that may flow into the slit valve opening 222 and deposit on the slit valve or the tunnel 238 leading to the slit valve opening 222. The one or more flow blockers 228 may be disposed between the relative top of the opening of the tunnel 238 and the bottom of the showerhead 228. More generally, when the apparatus is not a PECVD apparatus, the one or more flow blockers 228 may be disposed between the relative top of the tunnel 238 and the top or lid of the processing chamber. For example, in a PVD chamber, the one or more flow blockers 228 may be disposed between the relative top of the opening leading to the slit valve 222 and the target. The flow blockers 228 may reduce the amount of processing gas and plasma that may enter the slit valve opening 222 from the relative top of the opening 222. In one embodiment, the flow blockers 228 extend across the entire length of the sidewall having the slit valve opening 222. In another embodiment, the flow blockers 228 extend across at least the entire length of the slit valve opening 222, but less than the entire length of the sidewall. In another embodiment, flow blockers may extend vertically downward at locations corresponding to the edge of the slit valve opening 222 to define an inverted “U” shaped flow blocker that spans at least the length of the slit valve opening 222 and at least the height of the slit valve opening 222. The area between the slit valve tunnel 238 and the flow guider 224 that is below the slit valve opening 222 may remain open as processing gas and plasma is less likely to flow upwards under the inverted “U” shaped flow blocker.
In order to permit substrates to enter and exit the apparatus 200, the flow guider 224 disposed adjacent the slit valve opening 222 may have an opening 232 (See
The flow blockers 228 may be disposed within the chamber to disrupt the flow of plasma and processing gas towards the slit valve opening 222. The flow blockers 228 may reduce the amount of processing gas and plasma that may flow between the chamber wall 208 corresponding to the slit valve opening 222 and the flow guider 224 corresponding to the slit valve opening 222. Flow blockers 228 may be disposed on adjacent walls 208 to the wall 208 having the slit valve opening 222 to assist in reducing the amount of processing gas and plasma that may reach the slit valve opening 222. Thus, the flow blockers 228 direct the flow of processing gas and plasma around the slit valve opening 222 during evacuation and processing. In one embodiment, the one or more flow blockers 228 comprise a single piece that spans the length of the sidewall. In another embodiment, the one or more flow blockers 228 comprise a plurality of pieces.
The flow guiders and flow blockers may be coupled with each other and the chamber wall by conventional coupling means. In one embodiment, the flow guiders and the flow blockers comprise aluminum. In another embodiment, the flow guiders and the flow blockers comprise anodized aluminum. In another embodiment, the flow guiders and the flow blockers comprise stainless steel. In one embodiment, the flow blockers may comprise a unitary piece of material. In another embodiment, the flow blockers and the flow guider adjacent the slit valve may comprise a unitary piece of material.
By utilizing flow guiders, flow blockers, and slit valve liners, undesirable deposition on chamber walls and the slit valve may be reduced. By reducing undesirable deposition, processing chambers may need less cleaning and therefore, have less downtime. Reducing processing chamber downtime may increase substrate throughput.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/970,760 (APPM/012193L), filed Sep. 7, 2007, which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5024748 | Fujimura | Jun 1991 | A |
5443648 | Ohkase | Aug 1995 | A |
5603816 | Demaray et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5820723 | Benjamin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6099651 | Sajoto et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6192827 | Welch et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6325856 | Schertler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6364954 | Umotoy et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6647918 | Welch et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6663714 | Mizuno et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6716302 | Carducci et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6818067 | Doering et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6866746 | Lei et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7048837 | Somekh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7147719 | Welch et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7229666 | Mardian et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7981812 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8343307 | Huston | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020121342 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020189940 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030010451 | Tzu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030019428 | Ku et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030079686 | Chen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030198754 | Xi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040069225 | Fairbairn et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083978 | Welch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040094402 | Gopalraja et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040144311 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040245089 | Lawson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040245097 | Lawson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050196971 | Sen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050199491 | Gung et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050271812 | Myo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060039537 | Strobel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060207508 | Leung | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070044714 | White | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070178810 | Choi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080134974 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188033 | Choi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202416 | Provencher et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090064934 | Park et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090095334 | Huston | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095621 | Kao et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090107955 | Tiner et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090111280 | Kao et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110011338 | Chuc et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120196437 | Ishizaka et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120267346 | Kao et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120291709 | Smith et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1610768 | Apr 2005 | CN |
1801846 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1183717 | Jul 1989 | JP |
3516305 | Aug 1994 | JP |
1996-253857 | Jan 1996 | JP |
1997-111450 | Apr 1997 | JP |
1997-170077 | Jun 1997 | JP |
1997-265659 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10-116826 | May 1998 | JP |
2000-101500 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-183429 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002-161960 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2004-002971 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005-303308 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-290465 | Oct 2006 | JP |
10-2000-0067636 | Nov 2000 | KR |
10-2002-0037612 | Jul 2004 | KR |
20070055075 | May 2007 | KR |
WO 9734315 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9736177 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9739472 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9828460 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9832154 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9914391 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0048779 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0063460 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0066806 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0070606 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0071774 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0104379 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 03065085 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03097896 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004038774 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004046416 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004059030 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004075225 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093161 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005068382 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005073433 | Aug 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice to File a Response for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2008-0082184 dated Jul. 26, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090064934 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60970760 | Sep 2007 | US |