The present invention relates to optical imaging methods and apparatus useful in medical diagnosis and imaging. In particular, the present invention relates to a high speed method for implementing angular compounding, e.g., angular compounding by path length encoding (“ACPE”) for reducing speckle in optical coherence tomography images.
Optical coherence tomography (“OCT”) is a technique for obtaining high resolution cross-sectional images of biological tissues. Clinical OCT studies conducted in the gastrointestinal tract and cardiovascular system have shown that OCT is capable of providing images of the architectural (>20 μm) microanatomy of a variety of epithelial tissues, including the layered structure of squamous epithelium and arterial vessels. However, for certain medical applications, such as the early detection of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus and the identification of inflammation within atherosclerotic plaques, visualization of structures that are on a size scale of <20 μm may be preferable. OCT systems, with typical axial resolutions ranging from 8-12 μm, have the potential to resolve many of these structures, including nuclei, individual glands, and macrophages. Unfortunately, speckle, which occurs on the same size scale as these features, may prohibit unambiguous including nuclei, individual glands, and macrophages. Unfortunately, speckle, which occurs on the same size scale as these features, may prohibit unambiguous identification of the cellular and subcellular tissue components required for widespread clinical utilization of such technology.
Catheter or endoscope access and high-speed imaging is used in order to perform OCT in the internal organs of patients. In order to minimize diameter, most catheter-based OCT probes employ a single optical fiber to illuminate the sample and detect the signal from the tissue. High frame rates (typically 4-10 frames per second) are preferred for performing OCT imaging while minimizing artifacts caused by patient motion. A way to reduce speckle in OCT images that does not significantly increase the complexity of single optical fiber probe designs while maintaining high frame rates may be beneficial for applying OCT to accurately detect and quantify key microscopic tissue structures in patients.
The reduction of speckle in the OCT images speckle has been previously described. A publication by J. M. Schmitt, “Array Detection for Speckle Reduction in Optical Coherence Microscopy,” Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 1427-1429, 1997, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a procedure for a speckle reduction by averaging multiple images acquired at different angles, known as angular compounding. In this publication, multiple (N) detectors receive images that have been acquired from different angles. The images are averaged incoherently, providing an improvement (√{square root over (N)}) in the signal to noise ratio (“SNR”). While this technique has the advantage that the measurements may be performed in real-time, the experimental apparatus as described therein would not be compatible with a single fiber optic catheter.
Another publication, M. Bashkansky and J. Reintjes, “Statistics and reduction of Speckle in Optical Coherence Tomography,” Opt. Lett. 25, 545-547, 2000, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, describes an alternative technique for angular compounding to reduce speckle. In this method, a retroreflector apparatus is translated in front of the objective lens to change the angle of the incident beam on the tissue. N successive images are acquired and added incoherently to reduce speckle, again improving the SNR by a factor of √{square root over (N)}. While this method may be less complex than the use of multiple detectors, the time needed thereby to acquire the images is increased by N. In addition, the implementation of this method within the confines of a small diameter catheter or endoscope could be difficult.
According to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method for performing angular compounding to :reduce speckle within OCT images is provided, which may use angular compounding by path length encoding (“ACPE”). With ACPE, a high-speed acquisition can be maintained, and modifications to standard OCT catheter optics are likely to be minimal. In another exemplary embodiment according to the present invention, an apparatus for imaging is provided that uses ACPE.
Accordingly, apparatus probe catheter, and method according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention are provided for irradiating a sample. In particular, an interferometer may forward forwarding an electromagnetic radiation. In addition, a sample arm may receive the electromagnetic radiation, and can include an arrangement which facilitates a production of at least two radiations from the electromagnetic radiation so as to irradiate the sample. Such arrangement can be configured to delay a first radiation of the at least two radiations with respect to a second radiation of the at least two radiations.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a reference arm provides a further electromagnetic radiation. In particular, the interferometer receives the first, second and further radiations, and forms a resultant signal based on the first, second and further radiations. A processing arrangement may also be provided for generating a first image based on the first radiation and a second image based on the second radiation, such that the first and second images are different from one another. The further image may be generated based on the first and second images. In addition, the further image may have a noise that is smaller than a noise of the first image and a noise of the second image. Also, the further image may have a signal to noise ratio that is improved according to the equation:
where SNRACPE is the signal to noise ratio, SOCT is an amplitude of a high-pass filtered OCT signal, m is a thickness of the arrangement, ui is an amplitude of a demodulated OCT signal at a spatial location, and N=2m−1. Further, m=2 and N=3 images associated with the at least two radiations may be obtained. The further image may also be generated based on a mathematical combination of the first and second images.
According to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the sample can be irradiated by the first irradiation at a first angle, and by the second radiation at a second angle, such that the first and second angles different from one another. For example, the first and second angle may be different from one another based on the delay and at least one of a phase and a incident angle of each of the first and second radiations. It is also possible to utilize a detector which detects the first electromagnetic energy, and forwards the detected energy to the processing arrangement.
In still another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the arrangement can include two sections, each being configured to delay a respective one of the first and second radiations. In particular, a delay of the first radiation is preferably greater than a delay of the second radiation. In addition, the delay of a path of the first radiation compared to a path of the second radiation is at least 500 μm in air. Further, the delay of a path of the first radiation compared to a path of the second radiation is at least 1 mm in air. The arrangement may have a refractive index of at least 1.5 or at least 3.0. The arrangement can include silicon and/or an anti-reflective coating on at least one surface thereof. Such arrangement can be an anti-reflection-coated BK 7 glass. The glass may have a thickness of from about 1.6 mm to about 7.7 mm, and a refractive index of from about 1.51 to about 3.5.
According to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus for imaging is provided. The apparatus includes a sample arm that receive an electromagnetic radiation. The sample arm includes an arrangement which facilitates a production of at least two radiations from the electromagnetic radiation so as to irradiate a sample. The arrangement is configured to delay a first radiation of the at least two radiations with respect to a second radiation of the at least two radiations. The apparatus also includes a device for receiving the first and second radiations from the sample arm and at least one third radiation from a reference arm, such that the first and second radiations interfere with the third radiation. Further, the apparatus includes at least one of spectral separating unit which separates spectrum of at least one of the first, second and third radiations into frequency components, and at least one detection arrangement including a plurality of detectors. Each detector is capable of detecting at least a portion of at least one of the frequency components.
In a further exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus is provided. Such apparatus includes at least one first arrangement that provides at least one first electromagnetic radiation to a sample arm and at least one second electromagnetic radiation to a non-reflective reference arm. A frequency of radiation provided by the first arrangement varies over time. The sample arm receives the first electromagnetic radiation, and includes an arrangement which facilitates a production of at least two radiations from the electromagnetic radiation so as to irradiate a sample. The arrangement is configured to delay a first radiation of the at least two radiations with respect to a second radiation of the at least two radiations. The apparatus also includes at least one second arrangement detecting an interference between the first and second radiations generated at the sample arm and the second electromagnetic radiations generated at the reference.
In still another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus is provided. The apparatus includes a at least one first arrangement providing at least one first electromagnetic radiation to a sample arm and at least one second electromagnetic radiation to a reference arm. The first and/or second electro-magnetic radiation have a spectrum which changes over time. The spectrum contains multiple frequencies at a particular time. The sample arm receives the first electromagnetic radiation, and includes an arrangement which facilitates a production of at least two radiations from the electromagnetic radiation so as to irradiate a sample. The arrangement is configured to delay a first radiation of the at least two radiations with respect to a second radiation of the at least two radiations. The apparatus also includes at least one second arrangement detecting an interference between the first and second radiations generated at the sample arm and the second electromagnetic radiations generated at the reference.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention, when taken in conjunction with the appended claims.
The invention is illustrated in the drawings in which like reference characters designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures of which:
I. Materials And Methods
These beamlets 1 and 2, thus encoded by optical path length, also illuminate the sample at different angles. As a result, multiple OCT images, each acquired at different angles, are preferably present in a single OCT frame (as shown in
Previous attempts of utilizing OCT speckle reduction by image compounding has shown that the addition of N images of the same intensity provides an SNR increase by a factor of √{square root over (N)}. For example, the Bashkansky publication described above describes that the speckle distribution in OCT takes the form of the probability density function:
where κ=2ARσ, with AR is the amplitude of the reference field, SOCT is the amplitude of the high-pass filtered OCT signal, and σ is its standard deviation. For this probability density function, it can be demonstrated that the SNR improvement obtained by averaging N images of the same amplitude is also a factor of √{square root over (N)}, a result that has been experimentally described in the Schmitt and Bashkansky publications. For ACPE, the distinct OCT subimages generally may not have equal amplitudes. However, with the assumption of isotropic backscattering, these subimages are related to the original OCT image, S0OCT, by β/m2, where β is the number of path length combinations that contribute to a distinct subimage. As a result, the SNR for ACPE may be defined as
where ui is the amplitude of the demodulated OCT signal at a spatial location, and N=2m−1. In the case of m=2, N=3 images are obtained and the relationships between the amplitudes of the ACPE OCT subimages are S1OCT=S3OCT=¼S0OCT and S2OCT=2S1OCT=½S0OCT. The potential SNR improvement of the compounded m=2 ACPE image can then become SNRACPE/SNR0=1.63, where SNR0 is the signal to noise ratio of S0OCT.
An exemplary polarization-diverse OCT system according to the present invention can be utilized for the examplary apparatus (e.g., as shown in
A modified hand-held galvanometer probe (e.g., the apparatus of
A solid phantom consisting of 1% Intralipid solution and Agar can be used to measure a reduction in speckle provided by ACPE. For example, four (4) hairs can be embedded in the Intralipid-Agar gel at different transverse positions and depths. A schematic of the phantom is depicted in
In order to demonstrate SNR improvement in vivo, ACPE OCT imaging can be performed on a ventral forearm of a subject.
The apparatus and method according to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are provide to reduce speckle in OCT images that does not decrease the OCT frame rate and requires only minor modifications to the OCT probe. The implementation of ACPE, implements potential compromises between speckle reduction and three other OCT system parameters: a) sample arm transverse resolution, b) total reference arm path length, and c) OCT image sensitivity. In particular, for any given objective lens, ACPE may compromise the transverse resolution in one dimension by underfilling the lens aperture for each individual beamlet. In most cases, increasing the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective can compensate for this resolution loss.
Speckle averaged ACPE-OCT images can be obtained at the same rate as conventional OCT images by scanning an increased reference arm path length delay at substantially the same frequency. In order to acquire each of the individual OCT subimages, the new scan length of the ACPE-OCT system can preferably be L(2m−1), where L is the original scan length of the OCT system. Using phase control RSOD lines, scan ranges up to 10 mm are possible, thus enabling m=3, L=2 mm, and a maximum predicted SNR improvement of ˜2.1.
Increasing the reference arm path length scan range while maintaining the scan rate, may increase the electronic bandwidth and decrease the sensitivity of the OCT system. Also, because ACPE splits the sample arm power into 2m−1 subimages, each subimage contains a fraction of the original sample arm power. When imaging a human tissue, these losses may primarily affect the penetration depth of the OCT image. Since many features of clinical relevance, such as nuclei in patients with Barrett's esophagus or macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques, may bee present at tissue surfaces, for modest m, the improvements in image quality provided by ACPE likely outweigh sensitivity losses. Moreover, ongoing technical developments towards more efficient interferometer designs and higher power, clinically viable OCT sources may render ACPE sensitivity losses a non-issue.
The thickness of the path length encoding optical element described herein in the above-referenced Examples (3.1 mm BK7) may not be sufficient for OCT imaging in some tissues since the provide 800 μm separation between individual subimages. Increasing the thickness of the BK7 glass to 7.7 mm may allow a path length separation of 2 mm. This thickness may be adequate for a free-space, hand-held OCT probes, but can be be problematic in small diameter, flexible catheters, where minimizing the rigid length can be important. In order to increase the optical thickness of the path length encoding element, a higher refractive index material such as silicon (n=3.5) may be used. To create a 2 mm delay with silicon, preferably approximately 1.6 mm of the material can be used. When using high refractive index glass, dispersion imbalances between the reference and sample arms should be considered. For high-resolution OCT imaging (Δλ/λ>10%), appropriate selection of the optical material used for path length encoding will depend on the center wavelength and bandwidth of the source.
Advantages of the exemplary embodiment of the method and apparatus according to the present invention may include the fact that the OCT frame rate is not increased, and the addition of only a single passive element in the OCT probe should be implemented. These features of ACPE make the system and and method of the present invention compatible with OCT imaging in internal organ systems in patients. While implementation of ACPE may facilitate tradeoffs between speckle reduction and system sensitivity, the problems caused by speckle noise are likely more significant for clinical diagnosis than the penetration depth of modem OCT systems, especially at 1300 nm. Since difficulties in interpreting features on the size scale of 20 μm or less is in part a result of speckle noise in OCT images, ACPE would likely significantly improve the capabilities of OCT for the diagnosis of important diseases such as, but not limited to, dysplasia and inflammation in atherosclerosis.
Although only particular exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail herein above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate and understand that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention as defined in the following claims.
The present application claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/459,543 filed on on Mar. 31, 2003, International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/02349 filed on Jan. 24, 2003, and U.S. Patent Applications Ser. Nos. 60/476,600, 60/514,769, filed on Jun. 6, 2003 and Oct. 27, 2003, respectively, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2004/010152 | 3/31/2004 | WO | 00 | 9/29/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/088361 | 10/14/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2339754 | Brace | Jan 1944 | A |
3090753 | Matsuszak et al. | May 1963 | A |
3601480 | Sexton | Aug 1971 | A |
3856000 | Chikama | Dec 1974 | A |
3872407 | Hughes | Mar 1975 | A |
3941121 | Olinger | Mar 1976 | A |
3973219 | Tang et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3983507 | Tang et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4030827 | Delhaye et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4140364 | Yamashita et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4141362 | Wurster | Feb 1979 | A |
4224929 | Furihata | Sep 1980 | A |
4295738 | Meltz et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4300816 | Snitzer et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4303300 | Pressiat et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4428643 | Kay | Jan 1984 | A |
4479499 | Alfano | Oct 1984 | A |
4533247 | Epworth | Aug 1985 | A |
4585349 | Gross et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4601036 | Faxvog et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4607622 | Fritch et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4631498 | Cutler | Dec 1986 | A |
4650327 | Ogi | Mar 1987 | A |
4744656 | Moran et al. | May 1988 | A |
4751706 | Rohde et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4770492 | Levin et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4834111 | Khanna et al. | May 1989 | A |
4868834 | Fox et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4890901 | Cross, Jr. | Jan 1990 | A |
4892406 | Waters | Jan 1990 | A |
4909631 | Tan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4925302 | Cutler | May 1990 | A |
4928005 | Lefèvre et al. | May 1990 | A |
4965441 | Picard | Oct 1990 | A |
4965599 | Roddy et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4993834 | Carlhoff et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5039193 | Snow et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5040889 | Keane | Aug 1991 | A |
5045936 | Lobb et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5046501 | Crilly | Sep 1991 | A |
5065331 | Vachon et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5085496 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5120953 | Harris | Jun 1992 | A |
5121983 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
5127730 | Brelje et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5197470 | Helfer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202745 | Sorin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5212667 | Tomlinson et al. | May 1993 | A |
5214538 | Lobb | May 1993 | A |
5228001 | Birge et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5248876 | Kerstens et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5262644 | Maguire | Nov 1993 | A |
5291885 | Taniji et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293872 | Alfano et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293873 | Fang | Mar 1994 | A |
5304810 | Amos | Apr 1994 | A |
5305759 | Kaneko et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5317389 | Hochberg et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318024 | Kittrell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321501 | Swanson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5353790 | Jacques et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5383467 | Auer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5411016 | Kume et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419323 | Kittrell et al. | May 1995 | A |
5439000 | Gunderson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441053 | Lodder et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450203 | Penkethman | Sep 1995 | A |
5454807 | Lennox et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459325 | Hueton et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459570 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465147 | Swanson | Nov 1995 | A |
5486701 | Norton et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491524 | Hellmuth et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491552 | Knuttel | Feb 1996 | A |
5526338 | Hasman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5562100 | Kittrell et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565986 | Knüttel | Oct 1996 | A |
5583342 | Ichie | Dec 1996 | A |
5590660 | MacAulay et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600486 | Gal et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601087 | Richards-Kortum et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5621830 | Lucey et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623336 | Raab et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5635830 | Itoh | Jun 1997 | A |
5649924 | Everett et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5697373 | Gunderson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5698397 | Zarling et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710630 | Essenpreis et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716324 | Toida | Feb 1998 | A |
5719399 | Alfano et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735276 | Lemelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5740808 | Panescu et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748318 | Maris et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748598 | Swanson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784352 | Swanson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785651 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795295 | Hellmuth et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801826 | Williams | Sep 1998 | A |
5803082 | Stapleton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807261 | Benaron et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817144 | Gregory | Oct 1998 | A |
5840023 | Oraevsky et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840075 | Mueller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842995 | Mahadevan-Jansen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843000 | Nishioka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843052 | Benja-Athon | Dec 1998 | A |
5847827 | Fercher | Dec 1998 | A |
5862273 | Pelletier | Jan 1999 | A |
5865754 | Sevick-Muraca et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867268 | Gelikonov et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871449 | Brown | Feb 1999 | A |
5872879 | Hamm | Feb 1999 | A |
5877856 | Fercher | Mar 1999 | A |
5887009 | Mandella et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892583 | Li | Apr 1999 | A |
5912764 | Togino | Jun 1999 | A |
5920373 | Bille | Jul 1999 | A |
5920390 | Farahi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921926 | Rolland et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949929 | Hamm | Sep 1999 | A |
5951482 | Winston et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955737 | Hallidy et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956355 | Swanson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968064 | Selmon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983125 | Alfano et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987346 | Benaron et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991697 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994690 | Kulkarni et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002480 | Izatt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004314 | Wei et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006128 | Izatt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010449 | Selmon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014214 | Li | Jan 2000 | A |
6020963 | DiMarzio et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033721 | Nassuphis | Mar 2000 | A |
6044288 | Wake et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045511 | Ott et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048742 | Weyburne et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053613 | Wei et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069698 | Ozawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6091496 | Hill | Jul 2000 | A |
6091984 | Perelman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111645 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117128 | Gregory | Sep 2000 | A |
6120516 | Selmon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134003 | Tearney et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134010 | Zavislan | Oct 2000 | A |
6134033 | Bergano et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141577 | Rolland et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151522 | Alfano et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159445 | Klaveness et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160826 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161031 | Hochman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166373 | Mao | Dec 2000 | A |
6174291 | McMahon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175669 | Colston et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185271 | Kinsinger | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191862 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193676 | Winston et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198956 | Dunne | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201989 | Whitehead et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208415 | De Boer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208887 | Clarke | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6245026 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249349 | Lauer | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263234 | Engelhardt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264610 | Zhu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272376 | Marcu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274871 | Dukor et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282011 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6297018 | French et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308092 | Hoyns | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324419 | Guzelsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6341036 | Tearney et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353693 | Kano et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359692 | Groot | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377349 | Fercher | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384915 | Everett et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393312 | Hoyns | May 2002 | B1 |
6394964 | Sievert, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421164 | Tearney et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6445485 | Frigo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445944 | Ostrovsky | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459487 | Chen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463313 | Winston et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469846 | Ebizuka et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475159 | Casscells et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6475210 | Phelps et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485413 | Boppart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485482 | Belef | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501551 | Tearney et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501878 | Hughes et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6538817 | Farmer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549801 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552796 | Magnin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556305 | Aziz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556853 | Cabib et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558324 | Von Behren et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564087 | Pitris et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564089 | Izatt et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6615071 | Casscells, III et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622732 | Constantz | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6680780 | Fee | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685885 | Nolte et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687007 | Meigs | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687010 | Horii et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687036 | Riza | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701181 | Tang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6738144 | Dogariu | May 2004 | B1 |
6741355 | Drabarek | May 2004 | B2 |
6790175 | Furusawa et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6806963 | Wälti et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816743 | Moreno et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839496 | Mills et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6903820 | Wang | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6949072 | Furnish et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6980299 | de Boer | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7006231 | Ostrovsky et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7061622 | Rollins et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7190464 | Alphonse | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7231243 | Tearney et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242480 | Alphonse | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7355716 | De Boer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359062 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366376 | Shishkov et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7391520 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20010047137 | Moreno et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016533 | Marchitto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020064341 | Fauver et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020076152 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085209 | Mittleman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093662 | Chen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122246 | Tearney et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140942 | Fee et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158211 | Gillispie | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161357 | Rox et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163622 | Magnin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020172485 | Keaton et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183623 | Tang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188204 | McNamara et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196446 | Roth et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198457 | Tearney et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023153 | Izatt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026735 | Nolte et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028114 | Casscells, III et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030097048 | Ryan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108911 | Klimant et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135101 | Webler | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030164952 | Deichmann et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171691 | Casscells, III et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199769 | Podoleanu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216719 | Debenedictis et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220749 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236443 | Cespedes et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040054268 | Esenaliev et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072200 | Rigler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077949 | Blofgett et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086245 | Farroni et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100631 | Bashkansky et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100681 | Bjarklev et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040126048 | Dave et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133191 | Momiuchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150829 | Koch et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152989 | Puttappa et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166593 | Nolte et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040212808 | Okawa et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040239938 | Izatt | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263843 | Knopp et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018201 | De Boer | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035295 | Bouma et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046837 | Izumi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075547 | Wang | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083534 | Riza et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050171438 | Chen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060103850 | Alphonse et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060146339 | Fujita | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155193 | Leonardi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060244973 | Yun et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070019208 | Toida et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070291277 | Everett et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4105221 | Sep 1991 | DE |
4309056 | Sep 1994 | DE |
19542955 | May 1997 | DE |
10351319 | Jun 2005 | DE |
0110201 | Jun 1984 | EP |
0251062 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0617286 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0590268 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0728440 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0933096 | Aug 1999 | EP |
1324051 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1426799 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1257778 | Dec 1971 | GB |
2030313 | Apr 1980 | GB |
2209221 | May 1989 | GB |
4135550 | May 1992 | JP |
4135551 | May 1992 | JP |
7900841 | Oct 1979 | WO |
9216865 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9219930 | Nov 1992 | WO |
9303672 | Mar 1993 | WO |
9216865 | Oct 1993 | WO |
9533971 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9628212 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9732182 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9800057 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9801074 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9814132 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9835203 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9838907 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9846123 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9848838 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9848846 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9905487 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9944089 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9957507 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0058766 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0108579 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0138820 | May 2001 | WO |
0142735 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0236015 | May 2002 | WO |
0238040 | May 2002 | WO |
0254027 | Jul 2002 | WO |
03020119 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03052478 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03062802 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2003105678 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004034869 | Apr 2004 | WO |
20040066824 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004088361 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004105598 | Dec 2004 | WO |
20050000115 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005054780 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005082225 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006014390 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006039091 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006059109 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006130797 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007028531 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007038787 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007083138 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060227333 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60459543 | Mar 2003 | US | |
60476600 | Jun 2003 | US | |
60514769 | Oct 2003 | US |