Modern oil field operators demand access to a great variety of information regarding the parameters and conditions encountered downhole. Such information typically includes characteristics of the earth formations traversed by the borehole and data relating to the size and configuration of the borehole itself. The collection of information relating to conditions downhole, which commonly is referred to as “logging,” is typically performed by wireline logging, tubing-conveyed logging, and/or “logging while drilling” (LWD). In any one of these methods, the tools can obtain samples of reservoir rock and fluids and analyze them in the borehole or convey them to the surface for analysis. Alternatively, the tools can conduct near-borehole measurements using acoustic energy, electromagnetic signals, nuclear radiation, etc. Each of these techniques suffer from various limitations. For example, samples taken to surface may retain a history of changing condition effects, e.g., pressure and temperature changes that cause degradation of the sample. Contact with the tool or other borehole fluid can also cause chemical degradation of the sample. Even pulling fluids from the formation into the tool often induces some irreversible changes to, e.g., H2S concentration level or asphalting particle size. These and other logging techniques may be unable to adequately account for formation inhomogeneities as they collect their measurements. Under these circumstances clients are forced to reconstruct the history of changes to derive what down hole measurements might have yielded. Inadequate understanding of the formation characteristics can lead to financial allocation errors and very costly production modifications.
A better understanding of the various disclosed embodiments can be obtained when the following, detailed description is considered in conjunction with the attached drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the disclosure to the particular illustrated embodiments, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Accordingly, there are disclosed herein various logging systems and methods that employ nanosensors to obtain spectral measurements downhole. The nanosensors can he dispersed in borehole fluids (including cement slurries) that circulate, diffuse, get injected, or otherwise get exposed to the formation, formation fluids, or other materials of interest. Because the nanosensors have diameters on the order of 10 nm to 1000 nm, they readily penetrate into cracks, pores, and other voids where their carrier fluids can reach. The nanosensors transport light sources and recording media to measure spectra in these otherwise inaccessible regions. The nanosensors are then recovered and the recording media analyzed to reconstruct the measured spectra and determine relevant material characteristics therefrom. Among other things, spectral measurements can reveal the presence of certain elements and molecules in the formation and fluids, from which information scientists may be able to determine composition and phases of formation fluids and the formation itself. Certain triggering criteria may also be employed to add other dimensions to the measurements, e.g., different time delays, pressure thresholds, temperature thresholds, field strengths. Such triggering criteria can enable the nanosenor measurements to be associated with specific locations, paths, and/or events.
Thus, spectroscopic nanosensors offer a way to acquire reservoir description information from within the reservoir. Acquired information could include measurements related to chemical and physical properties of fluids or rocks as they lie nascent at a distance from any boreholes. Spectroscopic nanosensors can be incorporated into systems for: measurement while drilling, mud measurements, formation testing tools, production enhancement including improved oil recovery or fracture jobs, stimulation jobs including acid treatments, and coiled tubing treatments. The nanoscale sensors can be easily transported by carrier fluids into relatively permeable formations to obtain spectroscopic measurements of materials that they contact. The carrier fluid can be a component of a borehole fluid such as a drilling fluid, a stimulation or chemical treatment fluid, a flood/injection fluid, or a reverse pumpout formation test fluid. The spectroscopic nanosensors can be later recovered (either downhole or at the surface) in a number of ways, including pumpout or natural flow of the injected zone. Downhole tools can interrogate the nanosensors or the interrogation can be performed at the surface.
The disclosed systems and methods are best understood in the context of a suitable usage environment. Accordingly,
One or more logging tools 126 are integrated into the bottom-hole assembly near the bit 114. Suitable logging tools include formation fluid sampling tools, acoustic logging tools, electromagnetic resistivity tools, and nuclear magnetic resonance tools, among others. Logging while drilling tools usually take the form of a drill collar, i.e., a thick-walled tubular that provides weight and rigidity to aid the drilling process. As the bit extends the borehole through the formations, the logging tool(s) collect measurements of formation characteristics. Other tools and sensors can also be included in the bottomhole assembly to gather measurements of various drilling parameters such as position, orientation, weight-on-bit, borehole diameter, etc. Control/telemetry module 128 collects data from the various bottomhole assembly instruments (including position and orientation information) and stores them in internal memory. Selected portions of the data can be communicated to surface receivers 130 by, e.g., mud pulse telemetry. Other logging-while drilling telemetry methods also exist and could be employed. For example, electromagnetic telemetry or through-wall acoustic telemetry can be employed with an optional repeater 132 to extend the telemetry range. As another example, the drill string 108 could be formed from wired drillpipe that enables waveforms or images to be transmitted to the surface in real time to enable quality control and processing to optimize the logging resolution. Most telemetry systems also enable commands to be communicated from the surface to the control and telemetry module to configure the operation of the tools.
At various times during the drilling process, the drill string 108 may be removed from the borehole as shown in
As previously mentioned, there are a number of ways in which the nanosensors can be introduced into the downhole environment including, e.g., in a drilling fluid, a cement slurry, and a treatment/stimulation fluid. Where a more targeted use of nanosensors is desired, a portion of the borehole or borehole wall can he isolated for exposure to the nanosensors.
A variety of luminescent light sources are contemplated. One example employs a diamond film grown on a substrate and subjected to electron bombardment or an ultraviolet light laser treatment to create nitrogen vacancies. When excited by an electromagnetic pulse of the appropriate frequency and strength, the nitrogen vacancies flouresce, thereby illuminating their surroundings. The process for creating nitrogen vacancies can be optimized to maximize photon production for a given electromagnetic trigger pulse, Details on the creation and energizing of such a nanoscale light source can be found in the following references, which are hereby incorporated by reference:
As with the light source materials, a variety of photosensitive materials are contemplated. Sputtered silver halide would provide broadband photon detection. Detection of photons within narrow color bands is obtainable with chromophore-doped polyamide, for color bands. Adamantane with 2, 8 and 9 as the functional groups is also contemplated for use as the photoactive recording medium. Details on the creation and use of chromophore-doped polyimides and adamantane can be found in the following references, which are hereby incorporated by reference:
The film and substrate material is ground to fine powder. It may be evident that some variation is expected and perhaps desirable in the resulting nanosensors. For example, the particle size will vary across some range (e.g., 10 nm to 1000 nm) as well as the particle's shape, the relative orientations and amounts of the luminescent and photosensitive materials, and the temperature and energies at which the electron bombardments occur. The various manufacturing parameters can be optimized via Monte Carlo simulation to get the desired distribution of nanosensor characteristics.
Though the foregoing discussion assumes that each nanoparticle is provided with both a luminescent material and a photosenstive material, it is not strictly necessary to provide each nanosensor with both. Some contemplated system embodiments separate these two functions, so that some fraction of the nanoparticles are equipped with luminescent material and the rest are equipped with photosensitive material.
The custom surface affinity is an optional characteristic that provides the nanoparticle with an increased tendency to interact with a given target in the downhole environment. Specifically, the nanoparticle may be provided with a size, shape, and surface chemistry that enhances the nanoparticle's ability to interact with a selected target such as, e.g., an aqueous phase, a hydrocarbon phase, or a chemical analyte. As one particular example, the surface can be provided with a hydrophilic or hydrophobic coating to increase its solubility in a desired phase, thereby providing the nanoparticle with an enhanced chance of being in contact with the selected target when triggered.
The custom trigger may be a separate component of a nanoparticle type, or it can be an inherent part of how the light source energized. The trigger governs the time(s) at which the nanosensors collect their measurements. It can be given in the form of an externally applied electromagnetic pulse. Alternatively, the trigger can be a time-release membrane. Another alternative is an environmental condition such as, e.g., pH, eH, analyte concentration (or the presence of some other chemical), a temperature threshold, a pressure threshold, vibration, turbulence, magnetic field, or some target combination of conditions such as those that would represent the onset of scaling. In most cases, it is expected that the trigger would cause the light source to illuminate, but it is also contemplated that the trigger would enable the photosensitive material to be exposed.
The light source, as previously discussed, is contemplated to be a luminescent material. Different nanoparticle types could be provided with different luminescent materials. Such variation could, for example, increase the range of wavelengths over which spectroscopic measurements are acquired. Alternatively, or in addition, the variety of luminescent materials could provide different triggering times or conditions, thereby providing one potential mechanism for determining the variation of spectral measurements with respect to time, position, or some other variable.
The power source is an optional part of the nanoparticles, and it can take the form of a chemical mixture that reacts to produce light. It could also take the form of a resonant antenna that converts transmitted electromagnetic energy into power for a light emitting diode, or a junction between dissimilar materials that is energized by heat or ambient ions to generate electricity. It is even contemplated that a small quantity of radioactive material could be employed to induce phosphorescent molecules to glow. In most cases, however, it is expected that an external electromagnetic or sonic field would act directly on the luminescent material to pro vide illumination.
As previously discussed, the recorder can be a photosensitive material that changes state when exposed to light. The photosensitive material can be broadband (such as a silver halide) or wavelength-selective. For a subsequent spectral analysis to be performed, it is expected that either or both of the light source and the photosensitive material will have a relatively narrow band of wavelengths. Some spectral nanosensor types may have both a broadband source and broadband sensitivity to aid in calibrating the spectral measurements acquired by wavelength-specific nanosensor types. In at least some embodiments, the exposed nanosensors release a highly identifiable and unique tracer into the surrounding fluid, causing the flow of that fluid to become the telemetry medium that communicates the measurements to downstream sensors.
The sample interaction mechanism employed by the system is that mechanism that provides the nanosensor system with access to the desired portions of the downhole environment. In a fashion similar to the modified fluid sampling tool of
The system's player mechanism extracts the relevant state information from the nanosensors that have been exposed. In some embodiments, the nanosensors release tracer chemicals into their surrounding fluid and the player performs a chemical analysis to detect the relative concentrations of these tracers. In other embodiments, the nanosensors themselves are recaptured, separated from the fluid, and processed to extract their state information. In the case of the diamond nanocrystals described previously, analysis can take the form of the following sequence of operations. The fluid sample is centrifuged to separate the hulk of the liquid from the entrained solids. The sludge is repeatedly washed with an oil solvent substance (e.g., toluene) and re-centrifuged until only solid inorganic residue is left. The other inorganic residue is removed from the nanosensors with a HCl treatment followed by IV treatment (although the order may be reversed the expected order is HCl first followed by HF). At this point, it is expected that only the nanosensors would remain. Their size distribution is analyzed with normal particle size distribution methods, and the state of their photosensitive materials is probed via electron spin resonance (ESR) or optical methods which may require the use of chemicals to develop and fix the state of the photosensitive materials prior to optical examination. Until this probe has been performed, the nanosensors should be isolated from any external light to avoid degrading their measurements. Afterwards, however, the nanosensors may be re-triggered to analyze their luminescence intensity and spectra. This information is combined with the information from the probe operation to reconstruct the far field spectrum observed by the nanosensors. A separate sample of the recovered fluid can be analyzed spectroscopically and compositionally, and the results compared to interpret the state of the nascent reservoir fluids and rocks.
In block 706, the operator injects the carrier fluid with the nanosensors into the formation or circulates the fluid through the borehole to disperse the nanosensors. The nanosensors can even be entrained in a flood fluid that passes from an injection well to a producing well. In block 708, the nanosensors are triggered to acquire their spectral measurements, As previously mentioned, there are a variety of available triggering mechanisms that can be employed to refine the measurements that are acquired by the nanosensors. In optional block 710, the triggering operation may be repeated to cause the nanosensors to acquire additional measurements that enable their path or history to be later reconstructed. Acoustic, EM or pressure pulses can provide reference time markers at predefined intervals. Alone or in combination with a time-based logging mechanism (perhaps using a diffusion process in a substrate to embed the information into a crystal growth or perhaps using a electrochemical deposition process that can be time resolved), these pulses enable the acquired information to be read in away similar to the way in which CO2 concentration is read from ice cores in Antarctica, i.e., layer by layer. Some system embodiments include a mechanism for tracing the nanosensors' location or even their path) in the formation, For example, operators can use focused, steerable sonic or EM beams to trigger only particles at certain locations or at selected distances relative to the borehole. When such spatial triggering is combined with time-based logging, nanosensor path information can be discerned.
In block 712, the operator collects the nanosensors and extracts their state information. In block 714, the operator analyzes the extracted information to reconstruct the spectra observed by the nanosensors. From these spectra, the operator can extrapolate information about the reservoir fluids and rocks, which presented as a report in block 716.
Particular logging examples are now described. In a wireline formation tester example, the tool contacts the borehole wall with a probe. An initial formation pump out is performed to clear near-wellbore contamination including at least the mud cake from the probe's pad. It may be desirable to continue pumping until most of the near-wellbore drilling fluid filtrate contamination has been cleared as well. The pump is then reversed and a carrier fluid containing spectroscopic nanosensors is injected into the formation. The carrier fluid which has been designed to be miscible with the desired sample phase is either allowed to mix with the formation fluid over time, or, is forcibly mixed by oscillating direction of fluid flow. The degree of mixing can be modeled or monitored with sensors in the tool. Once mixing is complete, the nanosensors are triggered. One possible trigger method is to provide power from an external power source. One convenient method of external triggering and powering is an electromagnetic pulse from an NMR tool, which activates a nitrogen-vacancy crystal defect in a diamond nanocrystal and causes the defect to fluoresce. Another method is a sonic pulse designed to disrupt an encapsulated membrane separating two chemicals. When the chemicals combine they undergo a photo-luminescent reaction. Another possible trigger method is the elapsing of an internal timer. For example, the encapsulated membrane between two chemicals may be designed to degrade over time (e.g., such membranes are often employed in time release capsules). As yet another alternative, the sensor is filled with a photo-sonoluminescence material, enabling sound waves to act as both the trigger and the power source.
The light emitted from the nanosensors' light sources interacts with the materials surrounding the nanosensors. Those materials scatter, reflect, or re-emit the light back to the photosensitive material in the nanosensors. The pump draws fluid back from the formation along with the entrained nanosensors and captures at least one sample. The acquired sample may contain mainly the formation fluid. The tool may employ an optimization process to maximize the utility of the samples with regard to sampling the formation fluid and maximizing the concentration of captured nanosensors. The optimization process can employ tool sensors that monitor properties of the fluid and/or the concentration of nanosensors. Some tool embodiments collect the nanosensor information downhole, while other tool embodiments transport the captured fluids and nanosensors to the surface for analysis.
In a reservoir flood example, the nanosensors are manufactured with a time release trigger. The trigger may be a degradable membrane incorporated into the nanosensor shortly before delivery to the well site. The nanosensors are suspended in a carrier fluid phase designed to be miscible with the target sample phase. The carrier fluid is injected with the flood fluid (flood fluid may be liquid or gas). While the flood propagates through the formation, the nanosensors diffuse to the target phase. The time delay trigger degrades, causing a chemical reaction to provide light directly or indirectly by acting as power for the light source (either heat or electricity). The light interacts with the analyte and is recorded by the photosensitive material. The nanosensors travel with the flood to the production well and are produced. At the surface, the nanosensors are recovered and analyzed.
The spectroscopic nanosensors can be included in drilling fluid. This application may be potentially advantageous in that the nanosensors would be ubiquitous throughout the well and (if very rugged) throughout the production lifetime of the well. If the light release step is sensitive to pressure and or temperature then once in place and triggered the sensor's record becomes indicative of the sensor's exact location along the well bore. If cement subsequently fails then recovery of the nanosensors could reveal the exact location of the breach. In a variation of this example, the nanosensors are circulated as part of the drilling fluid and they invade the nearby formations as part of the mud filtrate. As a casing is cemented in place, a trigger chemical is included in the cement slurry. While the cement is intact, there is no fluid flow from the formations into the borehole. If a cement failure occurs, any fluid flowing from the formation into the borehole will transport the nanosensors through the pores, voids or cracks in the cement. As the nanosensors pass through the cement, they are activated by the trigger chemical to capture spectroscopic information about the degraded cement. A monitor at the surface detects the nanosensors and extracts the spectroscopic information to aid in diagnosing cause and location of the failure. (Some of the temperature and pressure sensitive nanosensors can be included to provide the location information.)
Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. For example, some reservoir sampling tools may be able to generate nanosensors on the spot by injecting (for example) a stable H2S reactive precipitate directly into the flow line and probing the precipitate later. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
This application claims priority to Provisional U.S. Application 61/350,365, titled “OILFIELD SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING SPECTROSCOPIC NANOSENSORS, and filed Jun. 1, 2010, by Christopher M. Jones, Michael T. Pelletier, Jing (Cynthia) Shen, and Marian L. Morys, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/038693 | 6/1/2011 | WO | 00 | 9/20/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/153190 | 12/8/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2972251 | Harper | Feb 1961 | A |
4160929 | Thorington et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4802761 | Bowen et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4839516 | Freeman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4994671 | Safinya et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4996421 | Rai et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5161409 | Hughes et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166747 | Schroeder et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5258620 | Sueyasu et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5284054 | Loebach | Feb 1994 | A |
5331399 | Tank et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341207 | Tank et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5360738 | Jones et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5457259 | Elgarhy et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5621523 | Oobayashi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5790432 | Morys | Aug 1998 | A |
5939717 | Mullins | Aug 1999 | A |
5946641 | Morys | Aug 1999 | A |
6040191 | Grow | Mar 2000 | A |
6162766 | Muir et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178815 | Felling et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6268726 | Prammer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6325146 | Ringgenberg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350986 | Mullins et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362619 | Prammer et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6378364 | Pelletier et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403949 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437326 | Yamate et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446719 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6446720 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465775 | Mullins et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6518756 | Morys et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527052 | Ringgenberg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543281 | Pelletier et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6583621 | Prammer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6688176 | Storm et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6729398 | Ringgenberg et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748328 | Storm et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755079 | Proett et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765384 | Morys | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768105 | Mullins et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6825659 | Prammer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6888127 | Jones et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912904 | Stomr, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6956204 | Dong et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967722 | Manning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975112 | Morys et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7021375 | Ringgenberg et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7073579 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7086463 | Ringgenberg et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095012 | Fujisawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7195731 | Jones | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7245382 | Ronnekleiv | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248370 | Jones | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251037 | Jones | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251565 | Storm et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7280214 | DiFoggio et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7315377 | Holland et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337660 | Ibrahim et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347267 | Morys et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362422 | DiFoggio et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7423258 | DiFoggio et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7490428 | Morys | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7490664 | Skinner et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508506 | Christian et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511819 | DiFoggio | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511823 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7532129 | Radzinski | May 2009 | B2 |
7571644 | Ibrahim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579841 | San Martin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581435 | Pelletier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7696756 | Morys et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697141 | Jones et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7762131 | Ibrahim et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775276 | Pelletier et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784350 | Pelletier | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800513 | Morys | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7866387 | van Zuilekom et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875455 | Li et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7938175 | Skinner et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958936 | McGregor et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976780 | Elrod et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8037935 | Pelletier | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8212568 | Morys et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8237920 | Jones et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010016562 | Muir et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20040164237 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050005694 | Jones et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019955 | Dahl et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050052105 | Schmidt | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050099618 | DiFoggio et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050169348 | Chen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060142955 | Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070035736 | Vannuffelen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070103162 | Morys et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070259433 | Jones et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080099241 | Ibrahim et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125335 | Bhavsar | May 2008 | A1 |
20080202747 | Gleitman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080297808 | Riza et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090107667 | Mullins et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120637 | Kirkwood et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151939 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199630 | DiFoggio et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090288820 | Barron et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100148787 | Morys et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100231225 | Morys et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245096 | Jones et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265094 | Zannoni et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110023583 | Jones et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110023594 | Pelletier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110031972 | Pelletier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110218736 | Pelletier | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251794 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120018152 | Zuilekom et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120018167 | Konopczynski et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120084021 | Jones et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120150451 | Skinner et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120160018 | Jones et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120211650 | Jones et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223221 | Jones et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232707 | Jones et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250017 | Morys et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130109100 | Sarkar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009356978 | Jun 2011 | AU |
177816 | Mar 1922 | GB |
310895 | Oct 1930 | GB |
1088268 | Oct 1967 | GB |
2441069 | Feb 2008 | GB |
2493652 | Feb 2013 | GB |
WO-2011063086 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011078869 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO-2011153190 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2011159289 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2011159294 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012161693 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Geng et al., Suppressed electron hopping in a Au nanoparticle/H2S system: development towards a H2S nanosensor, Feb. 2005, Chemical Commuminications, Issue 14, pp. 1895-1897. |
Adur, Rohan “Using Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond Nanocrystals for Sensitive Sensing of Weak Magnetic Fields with Nanoscale Resolution”, Ohio State Physics Term Paper, circa 2009, 4 pgs. |
Alaskar, Mohammed et al., “In-Situ Multifunction Nanosensors for Fractured Reservoir Characterization”, Proceedings, Thirty-fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, Feb. 1-3, 2010, SGP-TR-188. Retrieved from the Internet <http://ere.stanford.edu/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2010/askar.pdf>., 13 pgs. |
Balasubramanian, Gopalakrishnan et al., “Nanoscale Imaging Magnetometry with Diamond Spins under Ambient Conditions”, Nature, vol. 455, Oct. 2, 2008, pp. 648-651. |
Bleier, Z et al., “A Monolithic Interferometer for FT-IR Spectroscopy”, Spectroscopy, 13 (10), pp. 46-49. (Oct. 1999). |
Boudou, J.P. et al., “High Yield Fabrication of Fluorescent Nanodiamonds”, Nanotechnology v20 n23, Jun. 10, 2009, 11 pgs. |
Dumeige, Y. et al., “Photo-Induced Creation of Nitrogen-Related Color Centers in Diamond Nanocrystals Under Femtosecond Illumination”, Elsevier, www.elsevier.com/locate/jlumin, Journal of Luminescence 109 (2004), pp. 61-67. |
Faklaris, Orestis et al., “Comparison of the Photoluminescence Properties of Semiconductor Quantum Dots and Non-Blinking Diamond Nanoparticles. Observation of the Diffusion of Diamond Nanoparticlesin Living Cells”, J. European Optical Society, v4, 2009, 8 pgs. |
Florescu, Marian et al., “Improving Solar Cell Efficiency Using Photonic Band-Gap Materials”, ScienceDirect.com, (Jun. 29, 2007), pp. 1599-1610. |
ICX Photonics, “markIR Infrared Emitters”, icxphotonics.com, ICx Photonics, pp. 1-2. |
Lee, Seung W., et al., “A Soluble Photoreactive Polyimide Bearing the Coumarin Chromophore in the Side Group: Photoreaction, Photoinduced Molecular Reorientation, and Liquid-Crystal Alignability in Thin Films”, Langmuir 19 (24) 2003, pp. 10381-10389. |
Rabeau, J. R., et al., “Single Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in Chemical Vapor Deposited Diamond Nanocrystals”, Nano Letters, v7 n11 p3433-3437, 2007, Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia., pp. 1-20. |
Simons, J. K., et al., “X-ray Energy Dependent Photochemestry of the Adamantane (C10H16)/Si(111)-7X7 Surface”, American Vacuum Society, J. Vac Sci. Technol. A 11(4) Jul./Aug. 1993, pp. 2244-2249. |
Sonnefraud, Yannick et al., “25-nm Diamond Crystals Hosting Single NV Color Centers Sorted by Photon-Correlation Near-field Microscopy”, Optics Letters, vol. 33, Issue 6, 2008, pp. 611-613. |
Tank, V. “Remote Detection and Quantification of Hot Molecular Combustion Products—Experimental Instrumentation and Determination of Optimal Infrared Spectral Micro Windows”, Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 744-747, 3, pp. 235-242, (2005). |
Tisler, Julia et al., “Fluorescence and Spin Properties of Defects in Single Digit Nanodiamonds”, American Chemical Society, ACS Nano v3 n7 p1959-1965, 2009, pp. 1959-1965. |
Van Der Sar, T. et al., “Nanopositioning of a Diamond Nanocrystal Containing a Single NV Defect Center”, Applied Physics Letters v94 n17, 2009, 3 pgs. |
Zhang, Wei et al., “Method to Increase the Number of Filters per Optical Path in a Downhole Spectrometer”, PCT Appl No. PCT/US11/037655, filed May 24, 2011, 12 pgs, (Nov. 2012). |
Zhang, Wei et al., “Method to Increase the Numbers of Filters per Optical Path in a Downhole Spectrometer”, International Search Report and Written Opinion, filed May 24, 2011, 10 pgs, (Nov. 2012). |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Dec. 13, 2012, Application No. PCT/US2011/038693, “Spectroscopic Nanosensor Logging Systems and Methods”, filed Jun. 1, 2011, 9 pgs. |
First Chinese Office Action, dated Feb. 5, 2013, Appl No. 200980157701.3, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 13 pgs. |
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 18 pgs. |
Canadian Examiner Letter, dated Oct. 24, 2012, Appl No. 2,756,285, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 2 pgs. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 31, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 18 pgs. |
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 24, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 22 pgs. |
European Search Report, dated Dec. 12, 2013, Appl No. 09852686.6, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 7 pgs. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 4, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool,” filed Aug. 2, 2014, 25 pgs. |
CN Notice on the First Office Action, dated Aug. 15, 2014, Appl. No. 201180025452.X, “Spectroscopic Nanosensor Logging Systems and Methods,” Filed Jun. 1, 2011, 52 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130068940 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61350365 | Jun 2010 | US |