Spine distraction implant

Abstract
A spine distraction implant alleviates pain associated with spinal stenosis and facet arthropathy by expanding the volume in the spine canal and/or neural foramen. The implant provides a spinal extension stop while allowing freedom of spinal flexion.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




As the present society ages, it is anticipated that there will be an increase in adverse spinal conditions which are characteristic of older people. By way of example, with aging comes increases in spinal stenosis (including but not limited to central canal and lateral stenosis), the thickening of the bones which make up the spinal column and facet arthropathy. Spinal stenosis is characterized by a reduction in the available space for the passage of blood vessels and nerves. Pain associated with such stenosis can be relieved by medication and/or surgery. Of course, it is desirable to eliminate the need for major surgery for all individuals and in particular for the elderly.




Accordingly, there needs to be developed procedures and implants for alleviating such condition which are minimally invasive, can be tolerated by the elderly and can be performed preferably on an outpatient basis.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to providing a minimally invasive implant and method for alleviating discomfort associated with the spinal column.




The present invention provides for apparatus and method for relieving pain by relieving the pressure and restrictions on the aforementioned blood vessels and nerves. Such alleviation of pressure is accomplished in the present invention through the use of an implant and method which distract the spinous process of adjacent vertebra in order to alleviate the problems caused by spinal stenosis and facet arthropathy and the like. While the implant and method particularly address the needs of the elderly, the invention can be used with individuals of all ages and sizes where distraction of the spinous process would be beneficial.




In one aspect of the invention, an implant is provided for relieving pain comprising a device positioned between a first spinous process and a second spinous process. The device includes a spinal column extension stop and a spinal column flexion non-inhibitor.




In another aspect of the invention, the implant is positioned between the first spinous process and the second spinous process and includes a distraction wedge that can distract the first and second spinous processes as the implant is positioned between the spinous processes.




In yet another aspect of the present invention, the implant includes a device which is adapted to increasing the volume of the spinal canal and/or the neural foramen as the device is positioned between adjacent spinous processes.




In yet a further aspect of the present invention, a method is presented for relieving pain due to the development of, by way of example only, spinal stenosis and facet arthropathy. The method is comprised of the steps of accessing adjacent first and second spinal processes of the spinal column and distracting the processes a sufficient amount in order to increase the volume of the spinal canal in order to relieve pain. The method further includes implanting a device in order to maintain the amount of distraction required to relieve such pain.




In yet a further aspect of the invention, the method includes implanting a device in order to achieve the desired distraction and to maintain that distraction.




In yet a further aspect of the invention, the implant includes a first portion and a second portion. The portions are urged together in order to achieve the desired distraction.




In still a further aspect of the invention, the implant includes a distracting unit and a retaining unit. The distracting unit includes a body which can be urged between adjacent spinous processes. The body includes a slot. After the distracting unit is positioned, the retaining unit can fit into the slot of the retaining unit and be secured thereto.




In yet a further aspect of the invention, the implant includes a first unit with a central body. A sleeve is provided over the central body and is at least partially spaced from the central body in order to allow for deflection toward the central body.




In a further aspect of the invention, the implant includes a first unit having a central body with a guide and a first wing, with the first wing located at first end of the body. The guide extends from a second end of the body located distally from the first wing. The implant further includes a sleeve provided over said central body. The sleeve is at least partially spaced from the central body in order to allow for deflection of the sleeve toward the central body. The implant further includes a second wing and a device for securing the second wing to the first unit, wherein the sleeve is located between the first and second wings.




In yet another aspect of the invention, an implant system includes a cylindrical sleeve which is inwardly deflectable. The system further includes an insertion tool which includes an insertion guide, a central body, a stop and a handle. The guide and the stop extend from opposite sides of the central body and the handle extends from the stop. A sleeve fits over the guide and against the stop preparatory to being positioned between the two adjacent vertebrae with the insertion tool.




In yet a further aspect of the invention, the implant includes central body and first and second wings and a means for selectively positioning one of the first and second wings relative to the other in order to accommodate spinous processes of different sizes.




In yet still a further aspect of the invention, the implant includes a sleeve which is rotatable relative to the wings of the implant in order to be able to accommodate the anatomical structure of spinous processes.




In yet still a further aspect of the invention, the sleeve is formed from bar stock comprised of a super-elastic material.




Other implants and methods within the spirit and scope of the invention can be used to increase the volume of the spinal canal thereby alleviating restrictions on vessels and nerves associated therewith, and pain.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES





FIGS. 1 and 2

depict an embodiment of an implant of the invention which is adjustable in order to select the amount of distraction required.

FIG. 1

depicts the implant in a more extended configuration than does FIG.


2


.





FIGS. 3



a


and


3




b


depict side and end views of a first forked and of the embodiment of FIG.


1


.





FIGS. 4



a


and


4




b


depict side sectioned and end views of an interbody piece of the implant of FIG.


1


.





FIGS. 5



a


and


5




b


depict side and end views of a second forked end of the embodiment of FIG.


1


.





FIGS. 6

,


7


,


8


,


9


and


10


depict apparatus and method for another embodiment of the present invention for creating distraction between adjacent spinous processes.





FIGS. 11

,


12


and


13


depict yet a further embodiment of the invention for creating distraction between adjacent spinous processes.





FIGS. 14 and 15

depict a further apparatus and method of an embodiment of the invention for creating distraction.





FIGS. 16

,


16




a


, and


17


depict yet another embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 18

,


19


and


20


depict yet a further apparatus and method of the present embodiment.





FIGS. 21 and 22

depict still a further embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 23

,


24


and


25


depict another embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 26

,


27


and


28


depict another embodiment of the invention.





FIGS. 29 and 30

depict side elevational views of differently shaped implants of embodiments of the present invention.





FIGS. 31

,


32


and


33


depict various implant positions of an apparatus of the present invention.





FIGS. 34 and 35

depict yet another apparatus and method of the present invention.





FIGS. 36

,


37


and


38


depict three different embodiments of the present invention.





FIGS. 39 and 40

depict yet another apparatus and method of an embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 41

,


42


and


43


depict yet further embodiments of an apparatus and method of the present invention.





FIG. 44

is still a further embodiment of an implant of the invention.





FIG. 45

is yet another depiction of an apparatus and method of the invention.





FIGS. 46 and 47

depict still a further apparatus and method of an embodiment of the invention.





FIGS. 48

,


49


,


50


and


51


depict yet a further apparatus and method of the invention.





FIGS. 52

,


53


,


54


,


55




a


and


55




b


depict another apparatus and method of the invention.





FIGS. 56

,


57


and


58


depict yet a further apparatus and method of the invention.





FIGS. 59 and 60

depict still a further embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 61

depicts another embodiment of the invention.





FIGS. 62 and 63

depict yet another embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 64 and 65

depict still a further embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 66

depicts another embodiment of the invention.





FIGS. 67 and 68

depict yet another embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 69

,


70


,


71


and


71




a


depict a further embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 72 and 73

depict still another embodiment of the invention.





FIGS. 74

,


75


,


76


,


77


, and


78


depict still other embodiments of the invention.





FIGS. 79

,


80


,


80




a


,


81


,


82


,


83


,


83




a


,


84


,


85


,


86


and


87


depict still a further embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 88

,


89


,


90


and


91


depict yet another embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 92

,


92




a


,


92




b


,


93


,


93




a


,


93




b


,


93




c


,


93




d


,


94


,


94




a


,


94




b


,


95


,


95




a


, and


96


, depict still a further embodiment of the present invention wherein a sleeve is provided which is capable of deflecting response to relative motion between the spinous processes.





FIG. 97

depicts still another embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 98

depicts yet a further embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 99 and 100

depict still another embodiment of the present invention including an insertion tool.





FIGS. 101

,


102


,


102




a


,


103


,


104


,


105


,


106


, and


107


depict still a further embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 108

,


109


, and


110


depict still another embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 111

,


112


,


113


,


114


,


115


,


116


, and


117


depict yet another embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 118

depicts a graph showing characteristics of a preferred material usable with several of the embodiments of the present invention.





FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b


depict side and plan views of still a further embodiment of the present invention.





FIGS. 120



a


and


120




b


depict side and plan views of the second wing which can be used in conjunction with the embodiment of the invention of

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b.







FIGS. 121



a


and


121




b


depict side and plan views of the first wing and central body of the embodiment of the invention depicted in

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b.







FIGS. 122



a


,


122




b


, and


122




c


depict top, side and end views of a guide which is a portion of the embodiment of the invention of

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b.







FIGS. 123



a


and


123




b


depict an end view and a cross-sectioned view respectfully of the sleeve of the embodiment of the invention of

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b.







FIGS. 124



a


,


124




b


and


124




c


depict a view of the embodiment of the invention of

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b


taken through line


124





124


in

FIG. 119



b


shown in with the sleeve in various positions relative to a first wing.





FIG. 125

depicts an alternative embodiment of the invention as depicted in

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b.







FIG. 126

depicts yet a further alternative embodiment of the invention depicted in

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b.







FIG. 127

depicts yet a further embodiment of the invention as depicted in

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b.







FIG. 128

is still a further embodiment of the invention as depicted in

FIG. 93



a.







FIG. 129

depicts still a further embodiment of the invention as depicted in

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b.













DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Embodiment of FIGS.


1


-


5




a


,


5




b






A first embodiment of the invention is shown in

FIGS. 1-5



a


,


5




b


. Implant


20


includes first and second forked ends


22


and


24


, each defining a saddle


26


,


28


respectively. The forked ends


22


,


24


are mated using an interbody piece


30


. As can be seen in

FIGS. 3



a


,


3




b


, the first forked end


22


includes a threaded shaft


32


which projects rearwardly from the saddle


26


. The threaded shaft


32


fits into the threaded bore


34


(

FIG. 4



a


) of the interbody piece


30


.




The second forked end


24


(

FIGS. 5



a


,


5




b


) includes a smooth cylindrical shaft


36


which can fit into the smooth bore


38


of the interbody piece


30


.





FIG. 1

shows the implant


20


in a fully extended position, while

FIG. 2

shows the implant in an unextended position. In the unextended position, it can be seen that the threaded shaft


32


of the first forked end


22


fits inside the hollow cylindrical shaft


36


of the second forked end


24


.




For purposes of implantation between adjacent first and second spinous processes of the spinal column, the implant


20


is configured as shown in FIG.


2


. The first and second spinous processes are exposed using appropriate surgical techniques and thereafter, the implant


20


is positioned so that saddle


26


engages the first spinous process, and saddle


28


engages the second spinous process. At this point, the interbody piece


30


can be rotated by placing an appropriate tool or pin into the cross holes


40


and upon rotation, the saddle


26


is moved relative to the saddle


28


. Such rotation spreads apart or distracts the spinous processes with the resultant and beneficial effect of enlarging the volume of the spinal canal in order to alleviate any restrictions on blood vessels and nerves.




It is noted that this implant as well as the several other implants described herein act as an extension stop. That means that as the back is bent backwardly and thereby placed in extension the spacing between adjacent spinous processes cannot be reduced to a distance less than the distance between the lowest point of saddle


26


and the lowest point of saddle


28


. This implant, however, does not inhibit or in any way limit the flexion of the spinal column, wherein the spinal column is bent forward.




Preferably, such a device provides for distraction in the range of about 5 mm to about 15 mm. However, devices which can distract up to and above 22 mm may be used depending on the characteristics of the individual patient.




With all the ligaments (such as the superspinous ligament) and tissues associated with the spinous processes left intact, the implant


20


can be implanted essentially floating in position in order to gain the benefits of the aforementioned extension stop and flexion non-inhibitor. If desired, one of the saddles


26


can be laterally pinned with pin


29


to one of the spinous processes and the other saddle can be loosely associated with the other spinous processes by using a tether


31


which either pierces or surrounds the other spinous process and then is attached to the saddle in order to position the saddle relative to the spinous process. Alternatively, both saddles can be loosely tethered to the adjacent spinous process in order to allow the saddles to move relative to the spinous processes.




The shape of the saddles, being concave, gives the advantage of distributing the forces between the saddle and the respective spinous process. This ensures that the bone is not resorbed due to the placement of the implant


20


and that the structural integrity of the bone is maintained.




The implant


20


in this embodiment can be made of a number of materials, including but not limited to, stainless steel, titanium, ceramics, plastics, elastics, composite materials or any combination of the above. In addition, the modulus of elasticity of the implant can be matched to that of bone, so that the implant


20


is not too rigid. The flexibility of the implant can further be enhanced by providing additional apertures or perforations throughout the implant in addition to the holes


40


which also have the above stated purpose of allowing the interbody piece


30


to be rotated in order to expand the distance between the saddle


26


,


28


.




In the present embodiment, it is understood that the spinous processes can be accessed and distracted initially using appropriate instrumentation, and that the implant


20


can be inserted and adjusted in order to maintain and achieve the desired distraction. Alternatively, the spinous process can be accessed and the implant


20


appropriately positioned. Once positioned, the length of the implant can be adjusted in order to distract the spinous processes or extend the distraction of already distracted spinous processes. Thus, the implant can be used to create a distraction or to maintain a distraction which has already been created.




The placement of implants such as implant


20


relative to the spinous process will be discussed hereinbelow with other embodiments. However, it is to be noted that ideally, the implant


20


would be placed close to the instantaneous axis of rotation of the spinal column so that the forces placed on the implant


20


and the forces that the implant


20


places on the spinal column are minimized.




Further, it is noted that during the actual process of installing or implanting the implant


20


, that the method uses the approach of extending the length of the implant


20


a first amount and then allowing the spine to creep or adjust to this distraction. Thereafter, implant


20


would be lengthened another amount, followed by a period where the spine is allowed to creep or adjust to this new level of distraction. This process could be repeated until the desired amount of distraction has been accomplished. This same method can be used with insertion tools prior to the installation of an implant. The tools can be used to obtain the desired distraction using a series of spinal distraction and spine creep periods before an implant is installed.




Embodiment of FIGS.


6


,


7


,


8


,


9


and


10






The embodiment of the invention shown in the above

FIGS. 6

,


7


,


8


,


9


and


10


includes distraction or spreader tool


50


which has first and second arms


52


,


54


. Arms


52


,


54


are pivotal about pivot point


56


and releaseable from pivot point


56


in order to effect the implantation of implant


58


. As can be seen in

FIG. 6

, in cross-section, the arms


52


,


54


are somewhat concave in order to cradle and securely hold the first spinous process


60


relative to arm


52


and the second spinous process


62


relative to arm


54


. The distraction tool


50


can be inserted through a small incision in the back of the patient in order to address the space between the first spinous process


60


and the second spinous process


62


. Once the tool


50


is appropriately positioned, the arms


52


,


54


can be spread apart in order to distract the spinous processes. After this has occurred, an implant


58


as shown in

FIGS. 8 and 9

, or of a design shown in other of the embodiments of this invention, can be urged between the arms


52


,


54


and into position between the spinous processes. After this occurs, the arms


52


,


54


can be withdrawn from the spinous processes leaving the implant


58


in place. The implant


58


is urged into place using a tool


64


which can be secured to the implant


58


through a threaded bore


66


in the back of the implant. As can be seen in

FIG. 10

, the implant


58


includes saddles


68


and


70


which cradle the upper and lower spinous processes


60


,


62


in much the same manner as the above first embodiment and also in much the same manner as the individual arms of the tool


50


. The saddles as described above tend to distribute the load between the implant and the spinous processes and also assure that the spinous process is stably seated at the lowest point of the respective saddles.




Embodiment of FIGS.


11


,


12


and


13






Another embodiment of the apparatus and method of the invention is shown in

FIGS. 11

,


12


and


13


. In this embodiment, the spreader or distraction tool


80


includes first and second arms


82


,


84


which are permanently pivoted at pivot point


86


. The arms include L-shaped ends


88


,


90


. Through a small incision, the L-shaped ends


88


,


90


can be inserted between the first and second spinous processes


92


,


94


. Once positioned, the arms


82


,


84


can be spread apart in order to distract the spinous processes. The implant


96


can then be urged between the spinous processes in order to maintain the distraction. It is noted that implant


96


includes wedged surfaces or ramps


98


,


100


. As the implant


96


is being urged between the spinous processes, the ramps further cause the spinous processes to be distracted. Once the implant


96


is fully implanted, the full distraction is maintained by the planar surfaces


99


,


101


located rearwardly of the ramps. It is to be understood that the cross-section of the implant


96


can be similar to that shown for implant


58


or similar to other implants in order to gain the advantages of load distribution and stability.




Embodiments of FIGS.


14


,


15


,


16


,


16




a


, and


17






In

FIGS. 14 and 15

, yet another embodiment of the invention is depicted. In this embodiment, the implant


110


includes first and second conically shaped members


112


,


114


. Member


112


includes a male snap connector


116


and member


114


includes a female snap connector


118


. With male snap connector


116


urged into female snap connector


118


, the first member


112


is locked to the second member


114


. In this embodiment, a distraction or spreader tool


80


could be used. Once the spinous process has been spread apart, an implantation tool


120


can be used to position and snap together the implant


110


. The first member


112


of implant


110


is mounted on one arm and second member


114


is mounted on the other arm of tool


120


. The member


112


,


114


are placed on opposite sides of the space between adjacent spinous processes. The members


112


,


114


are urged together so that the implant


110


is locked in place between the spinous processes as shown in FIG.


15


. It is to be noted that the implant


110


can also be made more self-distracting by causing the cylindrical surface


122


to be more conical, much as surface


124


is conical, in order to hold implant


110


in place relative to the spinous processes and also to create additional distraction.




An alternative embodiment of the implant can be seen in

FIGS. 16 and 17

. This implant


130


includes first and second members


132


,


134


. In this particular embodiment, the implants are held together using a screw (not shown) which is inserted through countersunk bore


136


and engages a threaded bore


138


of the second member


134


. Surfaces


139


are flattened (

FIG. 17

) in order to carry and spread the load applied thereto by the spinous processes.




The embodiment of implant


130


is not circular in overall outside appearance, as is the embodiment


110


of

FIGS. 14 and 15

. In particular, with respect to the embodiment of implant


130


of

FIGS. 16 and 17

, this embodiment is truncated so that the lateral side


140


,


142


are flattened with the upper and lower sides


144


,


146


being elongated in order to capture and create a saddle for the upper and lower spinous processes. The upper and lower sides,


144


,


146


are rounded to provide a more anatomical implant which is compatible with the spinous processes.




If it is desired, and in order to assure that the first member


132


and the second member


134


are aligned, key


148


and keyway


150


are designed to mate in a particular manner. Key


148


includes at least one flattened surface, such as flattened surface


152


, which mates to an appropriately flattened surface


154


of the keyway


150


. In this manner, the first member is appropriately mated to the second member in order to form appropriate upper and lower saddles holding the implant


130


relative to the upper and lower spinous processes.





FIG. 16



a


depicts second member


134


in combination with a rounded nose lead-in plug


135


. Lead-in plug


135


includes a bore


137


which can fit snugly over key


148


. In this configuration, the lead-in plug


135


can be used to assist in the placement of the second member


134


between spinous processes. Once the second member


134


is appropriately positioned, the lead-in plug


135


can be removed. It is to be understood that the lead-in plug


135


can have other shapes such as pyramids and cones to assist in urging apart the spinous processes and soft tissues in order to position the second member


134


.




Embodiment of FIGS.


18


,


19


and


20






The implant


330


as shown in

FIG. 18

is comprised of first and second mating wedges


332


and


334


. In order to implant these wedges


332


,


334


, the spinous processes are accessed from both sides and then a tool is used to push the wedges towards each other. As the wedges are urged towards each other, the wedges move relative to each other so that the combined dimension of the implant


330


located between the upper and lower spinous processes


336


,


338


(FIG.


20


), increases, thereby distracting the spinous processes. It is noted that the wedges


332


,


334


include saddle


340


,


342


, which receiving the spinous processes


336


,


338


. These saddles have the advantages as described hereinabove.




The first or second wedges


332


,


334


have a mating arrangement which includes channel


344


and a; projection of


346


which can be urged into the channel in order to lock the wedges


332


,


334


together. The channel


334


is undercut in order to keep the projection from separating therefrom. Further, as in other devices described herein, a detent can be located in one of the channel and the projection, with a complimentary recess in the other of the channel and the projection. Once these two snap together, the wedges are prevented from sliding relative to the other in the channel


344


.




While the above embodiment was described with respect to wedges, the wedges could also have been designed substantially as cones with all the same features and advantages.




Embodiments of FIGS.


21


and


22






The implant


370


is comprised of first and second distraction cone


372


,


374


. These cones are made of a flexible material. The cones are positioned on either side of the spinous processes


376


,


378


as shown in FIG.


21


. Using appropriate tool as shown hereinabove, the distraction cones


372


,


374


are urged together. As they are urged together, the cones distract the spinous processes as shown in FIG.


22


. Once this has occurred, an appropriate screw or other type of fastening mechanism


380


can be used to maintain the position of the distraction cones


372


,


374


. The advantage of this arrangement is that the implant


370


is self-distracting and also that the implant, being flexible, molds about the spinous processes as shown in FIG.


22


.




Embodiments of FIGS.


23


,


24


and


25






In

FIGS. 23 and 24

, another embodiment of the implant


170


is depicted. This implant is guided in place using an L-shaped guide


172


which can have a concave cross-section such as the cross-section


52


of retraction tool


50


in

FIG. 6

in order to cradle and guide the implant


170


in position. Preferably a small incision would be made into the back of the patient and the L-shaped guide tool


172


inserted between the adjacent spinous processes. The implant


170


would be mounted on the end of insertion tool


174


and urged into position between the spinous processes. The act of urging the implant into position could cause the spinous processes to be further distracted if that is required. Prior to the insertion of the L-shaped guide tool


172


, a distraction tool such as shown in

FIG. 13

could be used to initially distract the spinous processes.




Implant


170


can be made of a deformable material so that it can be urged into place and so that it can somewhat conform to the shape of the upper and lower spinous processes. This deformable material would be preferably an elastic material. The advantage of such a material would be that the load forces between the implant and the spinous processes would be distributed over a much broader surface area. Further, the implant would mold itself to an irregular spinous process shape in order to locate the implant relative to spinous processes.




With respect to

FIG. 25

, this implant


176


can be inserted over a guide wire, guide tool or stylet


178


. Initially, the guide wire


178


is positioned through a small incision to the back of the patient to a position between the adjacent spinous processes. After this has occurred, the implant is threaded over the guide wire


178


and urged into position between the spinous processes. This urging can further distract the spinous processes if further distraction is required. Once the implant is in place, the guide tool


178


is removed and the incision closed. The insertion tools of

FIGS. 23 and 24

can also be used if desired.




Embodiment of FIGS.


26


,


27


and


28






The embodiment shown in

FIGS. 26

,


27


and


28


uses an implant similar to that depicted in

FIGS. 8 and 9

with different insertion tools. As can be seen in

FIG. 26

, an L-shaped distraction tool


190


is similar to L-shaped distraction tool


80


(FIG.


12


), is used to distract the first and second spinous processes


192


,


194


. After this has occurred, an insertion tool


196


is placed between the spinous processes


192


,


194


. Insertion tool


196


includes a handle


198


to which is mounted a square-shaped ring


200


.




The distraction tool


190


can be inserted through a small incision in the back in order to spread apart the spinous processes. Through the same incision which has been slightly enlarged laterally, an upper end


202


of ring


200


can be initially inserted followed by the remainder of the ring


200


. Once the ring is inserted, the ring can be rotated slightly by moving handle


198


downwardly in order to further wedge the spinous processes apart. Once this has been accomplished, an implant such as implant


204


can be inserted through the ring and properly positioned using implant handle


206


. Thereafter, the implant handle


206


and the insertion tool


196


can be removed.




Embodiments of FIGS.


29


,


30


,


31


,


32


and


33






As can be seen in

FIGS. 29 and 30

, the implants


210


,


212


, can have different shapes when viewed from the side. These implants are similar to the above-referenced implants


58


(

FIG. 8

) and


204


(FIG.


28


). These implants have cross-sections similar to that shown in

FIG. 10

which includes saddles in order to receive and hold the adjacent spinous processes.




As can be seen in

FIGS. 31

,


32


and


33


, these implants can be placed in different positions with respect to the spinous process


214


. Preferably as shown in

FIG. 33

, the implant


210


is placed closest to the lamina


216


. Being so positioned, the implant


210


is close to the instantaneous axis of rotation


218


of the spinal column, and the implant would experience the least forces caused by movement of the spine. Thus, theoretically, this is the optimal location for the implant.




As can be seen in

FIGS. 31 and 32

, the implant can be placed midway along the spinous process (

FIG. 32

) and towards the posterior aspect of the spinous process (FIG.


31


). As positioned shown in

FIG. 31

, the greatest force would be placed on the implant


210


due to a combination of compression and extension of the spinal column.




Embodiment of FIGS.


34


and


35






Another embodiment of the invention is shown in

FIGS. 34 and 35

. In these figures, implant


220


is comprised of a plurality of individual leaves


222


which are substantially V-shaped. The leaves include interlocking indentations or detents


224


. That is, each leaf includes an indentation with a corresponding protrusion such that a protrusion of one leaf mates with an indentation of an adjacent leaf. Also associated with this embodiment is an insertion tool


226


which has a blunt end


228


which conforms to the shape of an individual leaf


222


. For insertion of this implant into the space between the spinous processes as shown in

FIG. 29

, the insertion tool


226


first insert a single leaf


220


. After that has occurred, the insertion tool then inserts a second leaf with the protrusion


224


of the second leaf snapping into corresponding indentation made by the protrusion


224


of the first leaf. This process would reoccur with third and subsequent leaves until the appropriate spacing between the spinous processes was built up. As can be seen in

FIG. 29

, the lateral edges


229


of the individual leaves


222


are slightly curved upwardly in order to form a saddle for receiving the upper and lower spinous processes.




Embodiments of FIGS.


36


,


37


and


38






The embodiments of

FIGS. 36

,


37


and


38


which include implants


230


,


232


, and


234


respectively, are designed in such a manner so the implant locks itself into position once it is properly positioned between the spinous processes. Implant


220


is essentially a series of truncated cones and includes a plurality of ever expanding steps


236


. These steps are formed by the conical bodies starting with the nose body


238


followed there behind by conical body


240


. Essentially, the implant


234


looks like a fir tree placed on its side.




The implant


230


is inserted laterally throughout the opening between upper and lower spinous processes. The first body


238


causes the initial distraction. Each successive conical body distracts the spinous processes a further incremental amount. When the desired distraction has been reached, the spinous processes are locked into position by steps


236


. At this point, if desired, the initial nose body


238


of the implant and other bodies


240


can be broken, snapped or sawed off if desired in order to minimize the size of the implant


230


. In order for a portion of the implant


230


to be broken or snapped off, the intersection between bodies such as body


238


and


240


, which is intersection line


242


, would be somewhat weaken weakened with the appropriate removal of material. It is noted that only the intersection lines of the initial conical bodies need to be so weakened. Thus, intersection line


244


between the bodies which remain between the spinous processes would not need to be weaker, as there would be no intention that the implant would be broken off at this point.





FIG. 37

shows implant


232


positioned between upper and lower spinous processes. This implant is wedge-shaped or triangular shaped in cross-sectioned and includes bore pluralities


245


and


246


. Through these bores can be placed locking pins


248


and


250


. The triangular or wedged-shaped implant can be urged laterally between and thus distract the upper and lower spinous processes. Once the appropriate distraction is reached, pins


248


,


250


can be inserted through the appropriate bores of the bore pluralities


245


and


246


in order to lock the spinous processes in a V-shaped valley formed by pins


248


,


250


on the one hand and the ramped surface


233


,


235


on the other hand.




Turning to

FIG. 38

, the implant


234


has a triangular-shaped or wedge-shaped body similar to that shown in FIG.


32


. In this embodiment, tabs


252


,


254


are pivotally mounted to the body


234


. Once the implant


234


is appropriately positioned in order to distract the spinous processes to the desired amount, the tabs


252


,


254


rotate into position in order to hold the implant


234


in the appropriate position.




Embodiment of FIGS.


39


and


40






In the embodiment of

FIGS. 39 and 40

, cannula


258


is inserted through a small incision to a position between upper and lower spinous processes. Once the cannula is properly inserted, an implant


260


is pushed through the cannula


258


using an insertion tool


262


. The implant


260


includes a plurality of ribs or indentation


264


that assist in positioning the implant


260


relative to the upper and lower spinal processes. Once the implant


260


is in position, the cannula


258


is withdrawn so that the implant


260


comes in contact with and wedges between the spinous processes. The cannula


258


is somewhat conical in shape with the nose end


266


being somewhat smaller than the distal end


268


in order to effect the insertion of the cannula into the space between the spinous processes.




Further, a plurality of cannula can be used instead of one, with each cannula being slightly bigger than one before. In the method of the invention, the first smaller cannula would be inserted followed by successively larger cannula being placed over the previous smaller cannula. The smaller cannula would then be withdrawn from the center of the larger cannula. Once the largest cannula is in place, and the opening of the skin accordingly expanded, the implant, which is accommodated by only the larger cannula, is inserted through the larger cannula and into position.




Embodiments of FIGS.


41


,


42


and


43






The precurved implant


270


in

FIGS. 41 and 42

, and precurved implant


272


in

FIG. 43

have common introduction techniques which includes a guide wire, guide tool, or stylet


274


. For both embodiments, the guide wire


274


is appropriately positioned through the skin of the patient and into the space between the spinous processes. After this is accomplished, the implant is directed over the guide wire and into position between the spinous processes. The precurved nature of the implant assist in (1) positioning the implant through a first small incision in the patient's skin on one side of the space between two spinous processes and (2) guiding the implant toward a second small incision in the patient's skin on the other side of the space between the two spinous processes. With respect to the implant


270


, the implant includes a conical introduction nose


276


and a distal portion


278


. As the nose


276


is inserted between the spinous processes, this causes distraction of the spinous processes. Break lines


280


,


282


are established at opposite sides of the implant


270


. Once the implant is properly positioned over the guide wire between the spinous processes, the nose portion


276


and the distal portion


278


can be broken off along the break lines, through the above two incisions, in order to leave the implant


270


in position.




Although only two break lines


280


,


282


are depicted, multiple break lines can be provided on implant


270


so that the implant can continue to be fed over the guide wire


278


until the appropriate width of the implant


270


creates the desired amount of distraction. As described hereinabove, the break lines can be created by perforating or otherwise weakening the implant


270


so that the appropriate portions can be snapped or sawed off.




With respect to the precurved implant


272


, this implant is similar in design to the implant


230


shown in FIG.


36


. This implant


272


in

FIG. 47

, however, is precurved and inserted over a guide wire


274


to a position between the spinous processes. As with implant


230


in

FIG. 43

, once the appropriate level of this distraction has been reached and if desired, sections of the implant


272


can be broken, snapped or sawed off as described hereinabove in order to leave a portion of the implant wedged between the upper and lower spinous processes.




Embodiment of FIG.


44






A further embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG.


44


. This embodiment includes a combination insertion tool and implant


290


. The insertion tool and implant


290


is in the shape of a ring which is hinged at point


292


. The ring is formed by a first elongated and conically shaped member


294


and a second elongated and conically shaped member


296


. Members


294


and


296


terminate in points and through the use of hinge


292


are aligned and meet. Through similar incisions on both sides of the spinous processes, first member and second member are inserted through the skin of the patient and are mated together between the spinous processes. After this has occurred, the implant


290


is rotated, for example clockwise, so that increasingly widening portions of the first member


292


are used to distract the first and second spinous processes. When the appropriate level of distraction has occurred, the remainder of the ring before and after the section which is located between the spinous processes can be broken off as taught hereinabove in order to maintain the desired distraction. Alternatively, with a small enough ring, the entire ring can be left in place with the spinous processes distracted.




Embodiment of FIG.


45






In

FIG. 45

, the implant


300


is comprised of a plurality of rods or stylets


302


which are inserted between the upper and lower spinous processes. The rods are designed much as described hereinabove so that they may be broken, snapped or cut off. Once these are inserted and the appropriate distraction has been reached, the stylets are broken off and a segment of each stylet remains in order to maintain distraction of the spinous process.




Embodiment of FIGS.


46


and


47






Implant


310


of

FIGS. 46 and 47

is comprised of a shape memory material which coils upon being released. The material is straightened out in a delivery tool


312


. The delivery tool is in position between upper and lower spinous processes


314


,


316


. The material is then pushed through the delivery tool. As it is released from the delivery end


318


of the delivery tool, the material coils, distracting the spinous processes to the desired amount. Once this distraction has been achieved, the material is cut and the delivery tool removed.




Embodiments of FIGS.


48


,


49


,


50


and


51






As can be seen in

FIG. 48

, the implant


320


is delivered between upper and lower spinous processes


322


and


324


, by delivery tool


326


. Once the implant


320


is in place between the spinous processes, the delivery tool is given a 90° twist so that the implant goes from the orientation as shown in

FIG. 49

, with longest dimension substantially perpendicular to the spinous processes, to the orientation shown in

FIG. 50

where the longest dimension is in line with and parallel to the spinous processes. This rotation causes the desired distraction between the spinous processes. Implant


320


includes opposed recesses


321


and


323


located at the ends thereof. Rotation of the implant


320


causes the spinous processes to become lodged in these recesses.




Alternatively, the insertion tool


326


can be used to insert multiple implants


320


,


321


into the space between the spinous processes


322


,


324


(FIG.


51


). Multiple implants


320


,


321


can be inserted until the appropriate amount of distraction is built up. It is to be understood in this situation that one implant would lock to another implant by use of, for example, a channel arrangement wherein a projection from one of the implants would be received into and locked into a channel of the other implant. Such a channel arrangement is depicted with respect to the other embodiment.




Embodiment of FIGS.


52


,


53


,


54


,


55




a


and


55




b






The embodiment of

FIGS. 52 through 55



b


is comprised of a fluid-filled dynamic distraction implant


350


. This implant includes a membrane


352


which is placed over pre-bent insertion rod


354


and then inserted through an incision on one side of the spinous process


356


. The bent insertion rod, with the implant


350


thereover, is guided between appropriate spinous processes. After this occurs, the insertion rod


354


is removed leaving the flexible implant in place. The implant


350


is then connected to a source of fluid (gas, liquid, gel and the like) and the fluid is forced into the implant causing it to expand as shown in

FIG. 54

, distracting the spinal processes to the desired amount. Once the desired amount of distraction has occurred, the implant


350


is closed off as is shown in

FIG. 55



a


. The implant


350


being flexible, can mold to the spinous processes which may be of irregular shape, thus assuring positioning. Further, implant


350


acts as a shock absorber, damping forces and stresses between the implant and the spinous processes.




A variety of materials can be used to make the implant and the fluid which is forced into the implant. By way of example only, viscoelastic substances such as methylcellulose, or hyaluronic acid can be used to fill the implant. Further, materials which are initially a fluid, but later solidify, can be inserted in order to cause the necessary distraction. As the materials solidify, they mold into a custom shape about the spinous processes and accordingly are held in position at least with respect to one of two adjacent spinous processes. Thus, it can be appreciated that using this embodiment and appropriate insertion tools the implant can be formed about one spinous process in such a manner that the implant stays positioned with respect to that spinous process (

FIG. 55



b


). With such an embodiment, a single implant can be used as an extension stop for spinous process located on either side, without restricting flexion of the spinal column.




It is to be understood that many of the other implants disclosed herein can be modified so that they receive a fluid in order to establish and maintain a desired distraction much in the manner as implant


350


receives a fluid.




Embodiment of FIGS.


56


,


57


and


58






The implant


360


as shown in

FIG. 56

is comprised of a shape memory material such as a plastic or a metal. A curved introductory tool


362


is positioned between the appropriate spinous processes as described hereinabove. Once this has occurred, bore


364


of the implant is received over the tool. This act can cause the implant to straighten out. The implant is then urged into position and thereby distracts the spinous processes. When this has occurred, the insertion tool


362


is removed, allowing the implant to assume its pre-straightened configuration and is thereby secured about one of the spinous processes. Such an arrangement allows for an implant that is an extension stop and does not inhibit flexion of the spinous column. Alternatively, the implant can be temperature sensitive. That is to say that the implant would be more straightened initially, but become more curved when it was warmed by the temperature of the patient's body.




Embodiments of FIGS.


59


and


60






In this embodiment, the implant


380


is comprised of a plurality of interlocking leaves


382


. Initially, a first leaf is positioned between opposed spinous processes


384


,


386


. Then subsequently, leafs


382


are interposed between the spinous processes until the desired distraction has been built up. The leaves are somewhat spring-like in order to absorb the shock and can somewhat conform to the spinous processes.




Embodiment of FIG.


61






The implant


390


of

FIG. 61

includes the placement of shields


392


,


394


over adjacent spinous processes


396


,


398


. The shields are used to prevent damage to the spinous processes. These shields include apertures which receives a self-tapping screw


400


,


402


. In practice, the shields are affixed to the spinous processes and the spinous processes are distracted in the appropriate amount. Once this has occurred, a rod


404


is used to hold the distracted position by being screwed into each of the spinous processes through the aperture in the shields using the screws as depicted in FIG.


61


.




Embodiment of FIGS.


62


and


63






Implant


410


of

FIGS. 62

,


63


is comprised of first and second members


412


,


414


which can be mated together using an appropriate screw and threaded bore arrangement to form the implant


410


. Main member


412


and mating member


414


form implant


410


. Accordingly, the implant


410


would have a plurality of members


414


for use with a standardized first member


412


.

FIGS. 62 and 64

show different types of mating members


414


. In

FIG. 62

, the mating member


414


includes projections


416


and


418


which act like shims. These projections are used to project into the space of saddles


420


,


422


of the first member


412


. These projections


416


,


418


can be of varying lengths in order to accommodate different sizes of spinous processes. A groove


424


is placed between the projections


416


,


418


and mates with an extension


426


of the first member


412


.




As shown in

FIG. 63

, the projections of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 62

are removed and recesses


428


,


430


are substituted therefor. These recesses expand the area of the saddles


420


,


422


in order to accommodate larger spinous processes.




Embodiment of FIGS.


64


,


65


and


66






The embodiments of

FIGS. 64

,


65


and


66


are similar in design and concept to the embodiment of

FIGS. 62 and 63

. In

FIG. 64

, the implant


500


includes the first and second members


502


,


504


. These members can be secured together with appropriate screws or other fastening means as taught in other embodiments. Implant


500


includes first and second saddles


506


,


508


which are formed between the ends of first and second members


502


,


504


. These saddles


506


,


508


are used to receive and cradle the adjacent spinous processes. As can be seen in

FIG. 64

, each saddle


506


,


508


is defined by a single projection or leg


510


,


512


, which extends from the appropriate first and second members


502


,


504


. Unlike the embodiment found in

FIGS. 62 and 63

, each of the saddles is defined by only a single leg as the ligaments and other tissues associated with the spinous processes can be used to ensure that the implant is held in an appropriate position. With the configuration of

FIG. 64

, it is easier to position the implant relative to the spinous processes as each saddle is defined by only a single leg and thus the first and second members can be more easily worked into position between the various tissues.




In the embodiment of

FIG. 65

, the implant


520


is comprised of a single piece having saddles


522


and


524


. The saddles are defined by a single leg


526


,


528


respectively. In order for this implant


520


to be positioned between the spinous processes, an incision is made between lateral sides of adjacent spinous processes. The single leg


526


is directed through the incision to a position adjacent to an opposite lateral side of the spinous process with the spinous process cradled in the saddle


522


. The spinous processes are then urged apart until saddle


524


can be pivoted into position into engagement with the other spinous process in order to maintain the distraction between the two adjacent spinous processes.




The embodiment of

FIG. 66

is similar to that of

FIG. 65

with an implant


530


and first and second saddles


532


and


534


. Associated with each saddle is a tether


536


,


538


respectively. The tethers are made of flexible materials known in the trade and industry and are positioned through bores in the implant


530


. Once appropriately positioned, the tethers can be tied off. It is to be understood that the tethers are not meant to be used to immobilize one spinous process relative to the other, but are used to guide motion of the spinous processes relative to each other so that the implant


530


can be used as an extension stop and a flexion non-inhibitor. In other words, the saddles


532


,


534


are used to stop spinal column backward bending and extension. However, the tethers do not inhibit forward bending and spinal column flexion.




Embodiments of FIGS.


67


,


68






The implant


550


is Z-shaped and includes a central body


552


and first and second arms


554


,


556


, extending in opposite directions therefrom. The central body


552


of the implant


550


includes first and second saddles


558


and


560


. The first and second saddles


558


and


560


would receive upper and lower spinous processes


562


,


568


. The arms


554


,


556


are accordingly located adjacent the distal end


566


(

FIG. 68

) of the central body


552


. The first and second arms


554


,


556


, act to inhibit forward movement, migration or slippage of the implant


550


toward the spinal canal and keep the implant in place relative to the first and second spinal processes. This prevents the implant from pressing down on the ligamentum flavum and the dura. In a preferred embodiment, the central body would have a height of about 10 mm with each of the arms


554


,


556


having a height of also about 10 mm. Depending on the patient, the height of the body could vary from about less than 10 mm to about greater than 24 mm. As can be seen in

FIGS. 67 and 68

, the first and second arms


554


,


556


are additionally contoured in order to accept the upper and lower spinous processes


556


,


558


. In particular, the arms


554


,


556


as can be seen with respect to arm


554


have a slightly outwardly bowed portion


568


(

FIG. 68

) with a distal end


570


which is slightly inwardly bowed. This configuration allows the arm to fit about the spinous process with the distal end


570


somewhat urged against the spinous process in order to guide the motion of the spinous process relative to the implant. These arms


554


,


556


could if desired to be made more flexible than the central body


552


by making arms


554


,


556


thin and/or with perforations, and/or other material different than that of the central body


550


. As with the last embodiment, this embodiment can be urged into position between adjacent spinous processes by directing an arm into a lateral incision so that the central body


552


can be finally positioned between spinous processes.




Embodiment of FIGS.


69


,


70


,


71


and


71




a







FIGS. 69

,


70


and


71


are perspective front, end, and side views of implant


580


of the invention. This implant includes a central body


582


which has first and second saddles


584


,


586


for receiving adjacent spinous processes. Additionally, the implant


580


includes first and second arms


588


and


590


. The arms, as with the past embodiment, prevent forward migration or slippage of the implant toward the spinal canal. First arm


588


projects outwardly from the first saddle


584


and second arm


590


projects outwardly from the second saddle


586


. In a preferred embodiment, the first arm


588


is located adjacent to the distal end


600


of the central body


582


and proceeds only partly along the length of the central body


582


. The first arm


588


is substantially perpendicular to the central body as shown in FIG.


70


. Further, the first arm


588


, as well as the second arm


590


, is anatomically rounded.




The second arm


590


, projecting from second saddle


586


, is located somewhat rearward of the distal end


600


, and extends partially along the length of the central body


582


. The second arm


590


projects at a compound angle from the central body


582


. As can be seen in

FIGS. 70 and 71

, the second arm


590


is shown to be at about an angle of 45° from the saddle


586


(FIG.


70


). Additionally, the second arm


590


is at an angle of about 45° relative to the length of the central body


580


as shown in FIG.


71


. It is to be understood that other compound angles are within the spirit and scope of the invention as claimed.




In a preferred embodiment, the first and second arms


588


,


590


have a length which is about the same as the width of the central body


582


. Preferably, the length of each arm is about 10 mm and the width of the central body is about 10 mm. However, the bodies with the widths of 24 mm and greater are within the spirit and scope of the invention, along with first and second arms ranging from about 10 mm to greater than about 24 mm. Further, it is contemplated that the embodiment could include a central body having a width of about or greater than 24 mm with arms being at about 10 mm.




It is to be understood that the embodiment of

FIGS. 69

,


70


and


71


as well as the embodiment of

FIGS. 67 and 68

are designed to preferably be positioned between the L4-L5 and the L5-S1 vertebral pairs. The embodiment of

FIGS. 69

,


70


,


71


is particularly designed for the L5-S1 position with the arms being designed to conform to the sloping surfaces found therebetween. The first and second arms are thus contoured so that they lie flat against the lamina of the vertebra which has a slight angle.




The embodiment of

FIGS. 69

,


70


, and


71


as with the embodiment of

FIGS. 67 and 68

is Z-shaped in configuration so that it may be inserted from one lateral side to a position between adjacent spinous processes. A first arm, followed by the central body, is guided through the space between the spinous processes. Such an arrangement only requires that a incision on one side of the spinous process be made in order to successfully implant the device between the two spinous processes.




The implant


610


of

FIG. 71



a


is similar to that immediately above with the first arm


612


located on the same side of the implant as the second arm


614


. The first and second saddle


616


,


618


are slightly modified in that distal portion


620


,


622


are somewhat flattened from the normal saddle shape in order to allow the implant to be positioned between the spinous processes from one side. Once in position, the ligaments and tissues associated with the spinous processes would hold the implant into position. Tethers also could be used if desired.




Embodiment of FIGS.


72


,


73






Implant


630


is also designed so that it can be inserted from one side of adjacent spinous processes. This insert


630


includes a central body


632


with the first and second arms


634


,


636


extending on either side thereof. As can be seen in

FIG. 72

, a plunger


638


is positioned to extend from an end of the central body


632


. As shown in

FIG. 72

, the plunger


638


is fully extended and as shown in

FIG. 73

, the plunger


638


is received within the central body


632


of the implant


630


. With the plunger received into the implant


632


, the third and fourth arms or hooks


640


,


642


can extend outwardly from the central body


632


. The third and fourth arms or hooks


640


,


642


can be comprised of a variety of materials, such as for example, shape memory metal materials or materials which have a springy quality.




For purposes of positioning the implant


630


between adjacent spinous processes, the plunger


638


is pulled outwardly as shown in FIG.


72


. The central body


632


is then positioned between adjacent spinous processes and the plunger


638


is allowed to move to the position of

FIG. 73

so that the third and fourth arms


640


,


642


can project outwardly from the central body


632


in order to hold the implant


630


in position between the spinous processes.




Plunger


638


can be spring biased to the position as shown in

FIG. 73

or can include detents or other mechanisms which lock it into that position. Further, the third and fourth arms themselves, as deployed, can keep the plunger in the position as shown in FIG.


73


.




Embodiments of FIGS.


74


,


75


,


76


,


77


, and


78






Other embodiments of the invention are shown in

FIGS. 74 through 78

.

FIGS. 74

,


75


and


76


disclose implant


700


. Implant


700


is particularly suited for implantation between the L4-L5 and L5-S1 vertebra. As can be seen in

FIG. 74

, the implant


700


includes a central body


702


which has a bore


704


provided therein. Bore


704


is used in order to adjust the modulus of elasticity of the implant so that it is preferably approximately two times the anatomical load placed on the vertebra in extension. In other words, the implant


700


is approximately two times stiffer than the normal load placed on the implant. Such an arrangement is made in order to ensure that the implant is somewhat flexible in order to reduce potential resorption of the bone adjacent to the implant. Other modulus values can be used and be within the spirit of the invention.




Implant


700


includes first and second saddle


706


,


708


which are used to receive and spread the load from the upper and lower spinous processes. The saddle


706


is defined by first and second arms


710


and


712


. The second saddle


708


is defined by third and fourth arms


714


and


716


. As can be seen in

FIG. 74

, the first arm


710


, in a preferred embodiment, is approximately two times the length of the body


702


with the second arm being approximately less than a quarter length of the body. Third arm


714


is approximately one times the length of the body


702


with the fourth arm


716


being, in this preferred embodiment, approximately one and a half times the length of the body


702


. The arms are designed in such a way that the implant (1) can be easily and conveniently inserted between the adjacent spinous processes, (2) will not migrate forwardly toward the spinal canal, and (3) will hold its position through flexion and extension as well as lateral bending of the spinal column.




First arm


710


is in addition designed to accommodate the shape of the vertebra. As can be seen in

FIG. 74

, the first arm


710


becomes narrower as it extends away from the body


702


. The first arm


710


includes a sloping portion


718


followed by a small recess


720


ending in a rounded portion


722


adjacent to the end


724


. This design is provided to accommodate the anatomical form of for example the L4 vertebra. It is to be understood that these vertebra have a number of surfaces at roughly 30° angles and that the sloping surfaces of this embodiment and the embodiments shown in

FIGS. 77 and 78

are designed to accommodate these surfaces. These embodiments can be further modified in order to accommodate other angles and shapes.




The second arm


712


is small so that it is easy to insert between the spinous processes, yet still define the saddle


706


. The fourth arm


716


is larger than the third arm


714


, both of which are smaller than the first arm


710


. The third and fourth arms are designed so that they define the saddle


706


, guide the spinous processes relative to the implant


700


during movement of the spinal column, and yet are of a size which makes the implant easy to position between the spinous processes.




The procedure, by way of example only, for implanting the implant


700


can be to make an incision laterally between two spinous processes and then initially insert first arm


710


between the spinous processes. The implant and/or appropriate tools would be used to distract the spinous processes allowing the third leg


714


and the central body


702


to fit through the space between the spinous processes. The third leg


714


would then come to rest adjacent the lower spinous processes on the opposite side with the spinous processes resting in the first and second saddle


706


,


708


. The longer fourth leg


716


would then assist in the positioning of the implant


700


.





FIG. 77

includes an implant


740


which is similar to implant


700


and thus has similar numbering. The saddle


706


,


708


of implant


740


have been cantered or sloped in order to accommodate the bone structure between, byway of example, the L4-L5 and the L5-S1 vertebra. As indicated above, the vertebra in this area have a number of sloping surfaces in the range of about 300. Accordingly, saddle


706


is sloped at less than 300 and preferably about 20 while saddle


708


is sloped at about 300 and preferably more than 300.




The implant


760


as shown in

FIG. 78

is similar to implant


700


in FIG.


74


and is similarly numbered. Implant


760


includes third and fourth legs


714


,


716


which have sloping portions


762


,


764


which slope toward ends


766


,


768


of third and fourth arm


714


,


716


respectively. The sloping portions accommodate the form of the lower vertebra against which they are positioned. In the preferred embodiment, the sloping portions are of about 30°. However, it is to be understood that sloping portions which are substantially greater and substantially less than 30° can be included and be within the spirit and scope of the invention.




Embodiment of FIGS.


79


,


80


,


80




a


,


81


,


82


,


83


,


83




a


,


84


,


85


,


86


and


87






Another embodiment of the invention is shown in

FIGS. 79-87

and includes implant


800


(FIG.


86


). Implant


800


includes a distracting unit


802


which is shown in left side, plan, and right side views of

FIGS. 79

,


80


and


81


. A perspective view of the distraction unit is shown in FIG.


84


. The distracting unit as can be seen in

FIG. 80

includes a distracting body


804


, with longitudinal axis


805


, which body


804


has a groove


806


and a rounded or bulbous end


808


which assist in the placement of the distracting body between adjacent spinous process so that an appropriate amount of distraction can be accomplished. Extending from the distracting body


804


is a first wing


810


which in

FIG. 80

is substantially perpendicular to the distracting body


804


. Such wings which are not perpendicular to the body are within the spirit and scope of the invention. First wing


810


includes a upper portion


812


and a lower portion


814


. The upper portion


810


(

FIG. 79

) includes a rounded end


816


and a small recess


818


. The rounded end


816


and the small recess


818


in the preferred embodiment are designed to accommodate the anatomical form or contour of the L4 (for a L4-L5 placement) or L5 (for a L5-S1 placement) superior lamina of the vertebra. It is to be understood that the same shape or variations of this shape can be used to accommodate other lamina of any vertebra. The lower portion


814


is also rounded in order to accommodate in the preferred embodiment in order to accommodate the vertebrae. The distracting unit further includes a threaded bore


820


which in this embodiment accepts a set screw


822


(

FIG. 86

) in order to hold a second wing


824


(

FIGS. 82

,


83


) in position as will be discussed hereinbelow.




The threaded bore


820


in this embodiment slopes at approximately 45° angle and intersects the slot


806


. With the second wing


824


in position, the set screw


822


when it is positioned in the threaded bore


820


can engage and hold the second wing


824


in position in the slot


806


.




Turning to

FIGS. 82

,


83


and


85


, left side, plan and perspective views of the second wing


824


are depicted. The second wing


824


is similar in design to the first wing. The second wing includes an upper portion


826


and a lower portion


828


. The upper portion includes a rounded end


830


and a small recess


832


. In addition, the second wing


824


includes a slot


834


which mates with the slot


806


of the distracting unit


802


. The second wing


824


is the retaining unit of the present embodiment.




As can be seen in

FIGS. 83 and 86

, the second wing or retaining unit


824


includes the upper portion


826


having a first width “a” and the lower portion


828


having a second width “b”. In the preferred embodiment, the second width “b” is larger than first width “a” due to the anatomical form or contour of the L4-L5 or L5-S1 laminae. As can be seen in

FIG. 83



a


in second wing or retaining unit


824


, the widths “a” and “b” would be increased in order to, as described hereinbelow, accommodate spinous processes and other anatomical forms or contours which are of different dimensions. Further, as appropriate, width “a” can be larger than width “b”. Thus, as will be described more fully hereinbelow, the implant can include a universally-shaped distracting unit


802


with a plurality of retaining units


824


, with each of the retaining units having different widths “a” and “b”. During surgery, the appropriately sized retaining unit


824


, width with the appropriate dimensions “a” and “b” can be selected to match to the anatomical form of the patient.





FIG. 86

depicts an assembled implant


800


positioned adjacent to upper and lower laminae


836


,


838


(which are shown in dotted lines) of the upper and lower vertebrae. The vertebrae


836


,


838


are essentially below the implant


800


as shown in FIG.


86


. Extending upwardly from the vertebrae


836


,


838


, and between the first and second wings


810


,


824


, are the upper and lower spinous processes


840


,


842


. It is to be understood that in a preferred embodiment, the fit of the implant between the spinous processes can be such that the wings do not touch the spinous processes, as shown in

FIG. 86

, and be within the spirit and scope of the invention.




The implant


800


includes, as assembled, an upper saddle


844


and the lower saddle


846


. The upper saddle


844


has an upper width identified by the dimension “UW”. The lower saddle


846


has a lower width identified by the dimension “LW”. In a preferred embodiment, the upper width is greater than the lower width. In other embodiments, the “UW” can be smaller than the “LW” depending on the anatomical requirements. The height between the upper and lower saddles


844


,


846


is identified by the letter “h”. These dimensions are carried over into

FIG. 87

which is a schematic representation of the substantially trapezoidal shape which is formed between the upper and lower saddles. The table below gives sets of dimensions for the upper width, lower width, and height as shown in FIG.


87


. This table includes dimensions for some variations of this embodiment.

















TABLE











Variation




1




2




3













Upper Width




 8




7




6







Lower Width




 7




6




5







Height




10




9




8















For the above table, all dimensions are given in millimeters.




For purposes of surgical implantation of the implant


800


into a patient, the patient is preferably positioned on his side (arrow


841


points up from an operating table) and placed in a flexed (tucked) position in order to distract the upper and lower vertebrae.




In a preferred procedure, a small incision is made on the midline of the spinous processes. The spinous processes are spread apart or distracted with a spreader. The incision is spread downwardly toward the table, and the distracting unit


802


is preferably inserted upwardly between the spinous processes


840


and


842


in a manner that maintains the distraction of spinous processes. The distracting unit


802


is urged upwardly until the distracting or bulbous end


808


and the slot


806


are visible on the other wide side of the spinous process. Once this is visible, the incision is spread upwardly away from the table and the retaining unit or second wing


824


is inserted into the slot


806


and the screw


822


is used to secure the second wing in position. After this had has occurred, the incisions can be closed.




An alternative surgical approach requires that small incisions be made on either side of the space located between the spinous processes. The spinous processes are spread apart or distracted using a spreader placed through the upper incision. From the lower incision, the distracting unit


802


is preferably inserted upwardly between the spinous processes


840


and


842


in a manner that urges the spinous processes apart. The distracting unit


802


is urged upwardly until the distracting or bulbous end


808


and the slot


806


are visible through the second small incision in the patient's back. Once this is visible, the retaining unit or second wing


824


is inserted into the slot


806


and the screw


822


is used to secure the second wing in position. After this has occurred, the incisions can be closed.




The advantage of either of the above present surgical procedures is that a surgeon is able to observe the entire operation, where he can look directly down onto the spinous processes as opposed to having to view the procedure from positions which are to the right and to the left of the spinous processes. Generally, the incision is as small as possible and the surgeon is working in a bloody and slippery environment. Thus, an implant that can be positioned directly in front of a surgeon is easier to insert and assemble than an implant which requires the surgeon to shift from side to side. Accordingly, a top-down approach, as an approach along a position to anterior line is preferred so that all aspects of the implantation procedure are fully visible to the surgeon at all times. This aides in the efficient location of (i) the distracting unit between the spinous processes, (ii) the retaining unit in the distracting unit, and (iii) finally the set screw in the distracting unit.





FIG. 80



a


shows an alternative embodiment of the distracting unit


802




a


. This distracting unit


802




a


is similar to distracting unit


802


in

FIG. 80

with the exception that the bulbous end


808




a


is removable from the rest of the distracting body


804




a


as it is screwed into the threaded bore


809


. The bulbous end


808




a


is removed once the distracting unit


802




a


is positioned in the patient in accordance with the description associated with FIG.


86


. The bulbous end


808




a


can extend past the threaded bore


820


by about 1 cm in a preferred embodiment.




Embodiment of FIGS.


88


,


89


,


90


and


91






Another embodiment of the invention is shown in

FIGS. 88

,


89


,


90


and


91


. In this embodiment, the implant is identified by the number


900


. Other elements of implant


900


which are similar to implant


800


are similarly numbered but in the 900 series. For example, the distracting unit is identified by the number


902


and this is in parallel with the distracting unit


802


of the implant


800


. The distracting body is identified by the number


904


in parallel with the distracting body


804


of the implant


800


. Focusing on

FIG. 90

, the distracting unit


902


is depicted in a perspective view. The distracting unit includes slot


906


which is wider at the top than at the bottom. The reason for this is that the wider upper portion of the slot


906


, which is wider than the second wing


924


(FIG.


89


), is used to allow the surgeon to easily place the second wing


924


into the slot


906


and allow the wedge-shaped slot


906


to guide the second wing


924


to its final resting position. As can be see in

FIG. 91

, in the final resting position, the largest portion of the slot


906


is not completely filled by the second wing


924


.




The end


908


of implant


900


is different in that it is more pointed, having sides


909


and


911


which are provided at about 45° angles (other angles, such as by way of example only, from about 30° to about 60° are within the spirit of the invention), with a small flat tip


913


so that the body


904


can be more easily urged between the spinous processes.




The distracting unit


902


further includes a tongue-shaped recess


919


which extends from the slot


906


. Located in the tongue-shaped recess is a threaded bore


920


.




As can be seen in

FIG. 89

, a second wing


924


includes a tongue


948


which extends substantially perpendicular thereto and between the upper and lower portions


926


,


928


. The tab


948


includes a bore


950


. With the second wing


924


positioned in the slot


906


of the distracting unit


902


and tab


948


positioned in recess


919


, a threaded set screw


922


can be positioned through the bore


950


and engage the threaded bore


920


in order to secure the second wing or retaining unit


924


to the distracting unit


902


. The embodiment


900


is implanted in the same manner as embodiment


800


previously described. In addition, as the bore


922


is substantially perpendicular to the distracting body


904


(and not provided at an acute angle thereto), the surgeon can even more easily secure the screw in place from a position directly behind the spinous processes.




Embodiment of FIGS.


92


,


92




a


,


92




b


,


93


,


93




a


,


93




b


,


93




c


,


93




d


,


94


,


94




a




94




b


,


95


,


95




a


, and


96






Still a further embodiment of the invention is depicted in

FIGS. 92

, and


92




a


. In this embodiment, the implant


1000


as can be seen in

FIG. 92



a


includes a central elongated body


1002


which has positioned at one end thereof a first wing


1004


. Wing


1004


is similar to the first wing previously described with respect to the embodiment of FIG.


88


. Bolt


1006


secures wing


1004


to body


1002


in this embodiment. Bolt


1006


is received in a bore of the body


1002


which is along the longitudinal axis


1008


of the body. It is to be understood that in this embodiment, the first unit is defined by the central body


1002


, the first wing


1004


, and the guide


1010


.




Alternatively, the first wing can be secured to the central body with a press fit and detent arrangement as seen in

FIG. 93



c


. In this arrangement, the first wing has a protrusion


1040


extending preferably about perpendicularly from the first wing, with a flexible catch


1042


. The protrusion and flexible catch are press fit into a bore


1044


of the central body with the catch received in a detent


1046


.




In yet another alternative embodiment, the first wing can be designed as shown in

FIG. 93



d


with the protrusion directed substantially parallel to the first wing from a member that joins the first wing to the protrusion. Thus in this embodiment, the first wing is inserted into the body along the same direction as the second wing is inserted.




Positioned at the other end of the central body


1002


is a guide


1010


. In this particular embodiment, guide


1010


is essentially triangularly-shaped so as to be a pointed and arrow-shaped guide. Alternatively, guide


1010


could be in the shape of a cone with lateral truncated sides along the longitudinal axis


1008


. Guide


1010


includes a recess


1012


having a threaded bore


1014


. Recess


1012


is for receiving a second wing


1032


as will be described hereinbelow.




Additionally, it is also to be understood that the guide


1010


can be bulbous, cone-shaped, pointed, arrow-shaped, and the like, in order to assist in the insertion of the implant


1000


between adjacent spinous processes. It is advantageous that the insertion technique disturb as little of the bone and surrounding tissue or ligaments as possible in order to (1) reduce trauma to the site and facilitate early healing, and (2) not destabilize the normal anatomy. It is to be noted that with the present embodiment, there is no requirement to remove any of the bone of the spinous processes and depending on the anatomy of the patient, there may be no requirement to remove or sever ligaments and tissues immediately associated with the spinous processes.




The implant


1000


further includes a sleeve


1016


which fits around and is at least partially spaced from the central body


1002


. As will be explained in greater detail below, while the implant may be comprised of a bio-compatible material such as titanium, the sleeve is comprised preferably of a super-elastic material which is by way of example only, a nickel titanium material (NiTi), which has properties which allow it to withstand repeated deflection without fatigue, while returning to its original shape. The sleeve could be made of other materials, such as for example titanium, but these materials do not have the advantages of a super-elastic material.





FIG. 93



a


is a cross-section through the implant


1000


depicting the central body


1002


and the sleeve


1016


. As can be seen from the cross-section of

FIG. 93



a


in a preferred embodiment, both the central body


1002


and the sleeve


1016


are substantially cylindrical and oval or ecliptically-shaped. An oval or elliptical shape allows more of the spinous process to be supported by the sleeve, thereby distributing the load between the bone and the sleeve more evenly. This reduces the possibility of fracture to the bone or bone resorption. Additionally, an oval or elliptical shape enhances the flexibility of the sleeve as the major axis of the sleeve, as described below, is parallel to the longitudinal direction of the spinous process. However, other shapes such as round cross-sections can come within the spirit and scope of the invention.




In this particular embodiment, the central body


1002


includes elongated grooves


1018


, along axis


1008


, which receives elongated spokes


1020


extending from the internal surface of the cylinder


1016


.




In a preferred embodiment, both the cross-section of the central body and the sleeve have a major dimension along axis


1022


and a minor dimensional along axis


1024


(

FIG. 93



a


). The spokes


1020


are along the major dimension so that along the minor dimension, the sleeve


1016


can have its maximum inflection relative to the central body


1002


. It is to be understood that the central body along the minor dimension


1024


can have multiple sizes and can, for example, be reduced in thickness in order to increase the ability of the sleeve


1016


to be deflected in the direction of the central body


1002


.




Alternatively as can be seen in

FIG. 93



b


, the central body


1002


can include the spokes


1020


and the sleeve


1016


can be designed to include the grooves


1018


in order to appropriately space the sleeve


1016


from the central body


1002


.




In other embodiments, the sleeve can have minor and major dimensions as follows:



















Minor Dimension




Major Dimension





























 6 mm





10




mm







 8 mm





10.75




mm







12 mm





14




mm







 6 mm





12.5




mm







 8 mm





12.5




mm







10 mm





12.5




mm















In one preferred embodiment, said sleeve has a cross-section with a major dimension and a minor dimension and said major dimension is greater than said minor dimension and less than about two times said minor dimension. In said embodiment, said guide has a cross-section which is adjacent to said sleeve with a guide major dimension about equal to said sleeve major dimension and a guide minor dimension about equal to said sleeve minor dimension. Further in said embodiment, said guide extends from said central body with a cross-section which reduces in size in a direction away from said central body.




In another preferred embodiment, said guide is cone-shaped with a base located adjacent to said sleeve. Further, said guide has a base cross-section about the same as the oval cross-section of said sleeve.




Thus, from the above, it is evident that preferably a major dimension of the sleeve correspond with a major dimension of the central body and a minor dimension of the sleeve corresponds with a minor dimension of the central body. Additionally, it is evident that the major dimension of the sleeve


1016


is substantially perpendicular to a major dimension of the first wing


1004


along longitudinal axis


1030


(

FIG. 92



a


). This is so that as discussed above, when the implant


1000


is properly positioned between the spinous processes, a major portion of the sleeve comes in contact with both the upper and lower spinous processes in order to distribute the load of the spinous processes on the sleeve


1016


during spinal column extension.




As indicated above, the preferred material for the sleeve


1016


is a super-elastic material and more preferably one comprised of an alloy of nickel and titanium. Such materials are available under the trademark Nitinol. Other super-elastic materials can be used as long as they are bio-compatible and have the same general characteristics of super-elastic materials. In this particular embodiment, a preferred super-elastic material is made up of the following composition of nickel, titanium, carbon, and other materials as follows:






















Nickel




55.80%




by weight







Titanium




44.07%




by weight







Carbon




<0.5%




by weight







Oxygen




<0.5%




by weight















In particular, this composition of materials is able to absorb about 8% recoverable strain. Of course, other materials which can absorb greater and less than 8% can come within the spirit and scope of the invention. This material can be repeatably deflected toward the central body and returned to about its original shape without fatigue. Preferably and additionally, this material can withstand the threshold stress with only a small amount of initial deforming strain and above the threshold stress exhibit substantial and about instantaneous deformation strain which is many times the small amount of initial deforming strain. Such a characteristic is demonstrated in

FIG. 118

where it is shown that above a certain threshold stress level, deformation strain is substantially instantaneous up to about 8%.

FIG. 118

shows a loading and unloading curve between stress and deformation strain for a typical type of super-elastic material as described above.




Preferably, the above super-elastic material is selected to allow deformation of up to about, by way of example only, 8%, at about 20 lbs. to 50 lbs. force applied between a spinous processes. This would cause a sleeve to deflect toward the central body absorbing a substantial amount of the force of the spinous processes in extension. Ideally, the sleeves are designed to absorb 20 lbs. to 100 lbs. before exhibiting the super-elastic effect (threshold stress level) described above. Further, it is possible, depending on the application of the sleeve and the anatomy of the spinal column and the pairs of spinous processes for a particular individual, that the sleeve can be designed for a preferable range of 20 lbs. to 500 lbs. of force before the threshold stress level is reached. Experimental results indicate that with spinous processes of an older individual, that at about 400 pounds force, the spinous process may fracture. Further, such experimental results also indicate that with at least 100 pounds force, the spinous process may experience some compression. Accordingly, ideally the super-elastic material is designed to deform or flex at less than 100 pounds force.




In a preferred embodiment, the wall thickness of the sleeve is about 1 mm or {fraction (40/1000)} of an inch (0.040 in.). Preferably the sleeve is designed to experience a combined 1 mm deflection. The combined 1 mm deflection means that there is ½ mm of deflection at the top of the minor dimension and a ½ mm deflection at the bottom of the minor dimension. Both deflections are toward the central body.




In a particular embodiment where the sleeve is more circular in cross-section, with an outer dimension of 0.622 in. and a wall thickness of 0.034 in., a 20 lb. load causes a 0.005 in. deflection and a 60 lb. load causes a 0.020 in. deflection (approximately ½ mm). A 100 lb. load would cause a deflection of about 0.04 in. or approximately 1 mm.




Thus in summary, the above preferred super-elastic material means that the sleeve can be repeatedly deflected and returned to about its original shape without showing fatigue. The sleeve can withstand a threshold stress with a small amount of deforming strain and at about said threshold stress exhibit about substantially instantaneous deformation strain which is many times the small amount of the forming strain. In other words, such super-elastic qualities mean that the material experiences a plateau stress where the material supports a constant force (stress) over very large strain range as exhibited in FIG.


118


.




It is to be understood that for this particular embodiment, bar stock of the super-elastic material is machined into the appropriate form and then heat treated to a final temperature to set the shape of the material by increasing the temperature of the material to 932° Fahrenheit and holding that temperature for five (5) minutes and then quickly quenching the sleeve in water. It is also to be understood that preferably the present nickel titanium super-elastic alloy is selected to have a transition temperature A


f


of about 59° Fahrenheit (15° C.). Generally for such devices the transition temperature can be between 15° C. to 65° C. (59° F. to 149° F.), and more preferably 10° C. to 40° C. (50° F. to 104° F.). Preferably, the material is maintained in the body above the transition temperature in order to exhibit optimal elasticity qualities.




Alternatively, and preferably, the sleeve can be fabricated by wire Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) rather than machined. Additionally, the sleeve can be finished using a shot blast technique in order to increase the surface strength and elasticity of the sleeve.




Top and side views of the second wing


1032


are shown in

FIGS. 94 and 95

. Second wing


1032


as in several past embodiments includes a tab


1034


with a bore


1036


which aligns with the bore


1014


of the guide


1010


. In this particular embodiment, the second wing


1032


includes a cut-out


1038


which is sized to fit over the guide


1010


, with the tab


1034


resting in the recess


1012


of the guide


1010


.




An alternative configuration of the second wing


1032


is depicted in

FIG. 94



a


. In this configuration, the second wing


1032


is held at acute angle with respect to the tab


1034


. This is different from the situation in the embodiment of

FIGS. 94 and 95

where the second wing is substantially perpendicular to the tab. For the embodiment of the second wing in

FIG. 94



a


, such embodiment will be utilized as appropriate depending on the shape of the spinous processes.




With respect to the alternative second wing


1032


depicted in

FIGS. 94



b


and


95




a


, elongated tab


1034


has a plurality of closely positioned bores


1036


. The bores, so positioned, appear to form a scallop shape. Each individual scallop portion of the bore


1036


can selectively hold the bolt in order to effectively position the second wing


1032


in three different positions relative to the first wing


1004


. The cut-out


1038


(

FIG. 95



a


of this alternative embodiment) is enlarged over that of

FIG. 95

as in a position closest to the first wing


1004


, the second wing


1032


is immediately adjacent and must conform to the shape of the sleeve


1016


.




Embodiment of FIG.


97






Implant


1050


of

FIG. 97

is similar to the implant


1000


in

FIG. 92

with the major difference being that a second wing is not required. The implant


1050


includes a central body as does implant


1000


. The central body is surrounded by a sleeve


1016


which extends between a first wing


1004


and a guide


1010


. The guide


1010


in this embodiment is substantially cone-shaped without any flats and with no bore as there is no need to receive a second wing. The sleeve and the central body as well as the first wing and guide act in a manner similar to those parts of the implant


1000


in FIG.


92


. It is to be understood a cross-section of this implant


1050


through sleeve


1016


can preferably be like

FIG. 93



a


. This particular embodiment would be utilized in a situation where it was deemed impractical or unnecessary to use a second wing. This embodiment has the significant advantages of the sleeve being comprised of super-elastic alloy materials as well as the guide being utilized to guide the implant between spinous processes while minimizing damage to the ligament and tissue structures found around the spinous processes.




Embodiment of FIG.


98






Implant


1060


is depicted in FIG.


98


. This implant is similar to the implants


1000


of FIG.


92


and the implant


1050


of

FIG. 97

, except that this implant does not have either first or second wings. Implant


1060


includes a sleeve


1016


which surrounds a central body just as central body


1002


of implant


1000


in FIG.


93


. It is to be understood that a cross-section of this implant


1060


through sleeve


1016


can preferably be like

FIG. 93



a


. Implant


1060


includes a guide


1010


which in this preferred embodiment is cone-shaped. Guide


1010


is located at one end of the central body. At the other end is a stop


1062


. Stop


1062


is used to contain the other end of the sleeve


1016


relative to the central body. This embodiment is held together with a bolt such as bolt


1006


of

FIG. 93

that is used for the immediate above two implants. For the implant


1060


of

FIG. 98

, such a device would be appropriate where the anatomy between the spinous processes was such that it would be undesirable to use either a first or second wing. However, this embodiment affords all the advantageous described hereinabove (

FIGS. 92 and 97

) with respect to the guide and also with respect to the dynamics of the sleeve.




Embodiment of FIGS.


99


and


100







FIGS. 99 and 100

depict an implant system


1070


. Implant system


1070


includes a sleeve


1072


which is similar to and has the advantages of sleeve


1016


of the embodiment in FIG.


92


. Sleeve


1072


does not, however, have any spokes. Additionally, implant system


1070


includes an insertion tool


1074


. Insertion tool


1074


includes a guide


1076


which in a preferred embodiment is substantially cone-shaped. Guide


1076


guides the insertion of the sleeve


1072


and the insertion tool


1074


between adjacent spinous processes. The insertion tool


1074


further includes a central body


1078


, a stop


1080


, and a handle


1082


. The guide


1076


at its base has dimensions which are slightly less than the internal dimensions of the sleeve


1074


so that the sleeve can fit over the guide


1076


and rest against the stop


1080


. The tool


1074


with the guide


1076


is used to separate tissues and ligaments and to urge the sleeve


1072


in the space between the spinous processes. Once positioned, the guide insertion tool


1074


can be removed leaving the sleeve


1072


in place. If desired, after the sleeve is positioned, position maintaining mechanisms such as springy wires


1084


made out of appropriate material such as the super-elastic alloys and other materials including titanium, can be inserted using a cannula through the center of the sleeve


1072


. Once inserted, the ends of the retaining wires


1084


(

FIG. 99

) extend out of both ends of the sleeve


1072


, and due to this springy nature, bend at an angle with respect to the longitudinal axis of the sleeve


1072


. These wires help maintain the position of the sleeve relative to the spinous processes.




Embodiment of FIGS.


101


,


102


,


102




a


,


103


,


104


,


105


,


106


, and


107






Another embodiment of the invention can be seen in

FIG. 101

which includes implant


1100


. Implant


1100


has many similar features that are exhibited with respect to implant


1000


in FIG.


92


. Accordingly, elements with similar features and functions would be similarly numbered. Additionally, features that are different from implant


1100


can be, if desired, imported into and become a part of the implant


1000


of FIG.


92


.




As with implant


1000


, implant


1100


includes a central body


1002


(

FIG. 102

) with a first wing


1004


and a bolt


1006


which holds the first wing and the central body together. In this particular embodiment, the central body is made in two portions. The first portion


1102


is in the shape of a truncated cone with an oval or elliptical base and a second portion


1104


includes a cylindrical central portion with a distal end in the shape of a truncated cone


1103


with an oval or elliptical base. In addition, in this particular embodiment, formed with the central body is the guide


1010


which has an oval or elliptical base. Bolt


1006


is used to secure the first wing through the second portion


1104


with the first portion


1102


held in-between. In this particular embodiment, the guide


1010


in addition to including recess


1012


and bore


1014


includes a groove


1106


which receives a portion of the second wing


1032


.




In this particular embodiment, the sleeve


1016


is preferably oval or elliptical in shape as can be seen in

FIG. 102



a


. The central body can be oval, elliptical or circular in cross-section, although other shapes are within the spirit and scope of the invention. The sleeve


1016


held in position due to the fact that the truncated conical portion


1102


and the corresponding truncated conical portion


1103


each have a base that is elliptical or oval in shape. Thus, the sleeve is held in position so that preferably the major dimension of the elliptical sleeve is substantially perpendicular to the major dimension of the first wing. It is to be understood that if the first wing is meant to be put beside the vertebrae so that the first wing is set at an angle other than perpendicular with respect to the vertebrae and that the sleeve may be held in a position so that the major dimension of the sleeve is at an angle other than perpendicular to the major dimension of the first wing and be within the spirit and scope of the invention. This could be accomplished by tightening bolt


1006


with the first wing


1004


and sleeve


1016


so positioned. In such a configuration, the major dimension of the sleeve would be preferably positioned so that it is essentially parallel to the length of the adjacent spinous processes. So configured, the elliptical or oval shape sleeve would bear and distribute the load more evenly over more of its surface.




It is to be understood that the sleeve in this embodiment has all the characteristics and advantages described hereinabove with respect to the above-referenced super-elastic sleeves.




The second wing as discussed above, can come in a variety of shapes in order to provide for variations in the anatomical form of the spinous processes. Such shapes are depicted in

FIGS. 103

,


104


,


105


,


106


, and


107


. In each configuration, the second wing


1032


has a an upper portion


1108


and a lower portion


1110


. In

FIG. 104

, the lower portion is thicker than the upper portion in order to accommodate the spinous process, where the lower spinous process is thinner than the upper spinous process. In

FIG. 105

, both the upper and lower portions are enlarged over the upper and lower portions of

FIG. 103

to accommodate both the upper and lower spinous processes being smaller. That is to say that the space between the upper and lower portions of the first and second wings are reduced due to the enlarged upper and lower portions of the second wing.




Alternative embodiments of second wings, as shown in

FIGS. 104 and 105

, are depicted in

FIGS. 106 and 107

. In these

FIGS. 106 and 107

, the second wing


1032


accommodates the same anatomical shape and size of the spinous processes as does the second wing in

FIGS. 104 and 105

respectively. However, in the embodiments of the second wing


1032


of

FIGS. 106 and 107

, substantial masses have been removed from the wings. The upper and lower portions


1108


and


1110


are essentially formed or bent in order to extend from the central portion


1112


of the second wing


1032


.




It is to be understood that in this embodiment, if desired, the second wing may not have to be used, depending on the anatomy of the spinal column of the body, and this embodiment still has the significant advantages attributable to the guide


1010


and the functionality of the sleeve


1016


.




Embodiment of FIGS.


108


,


109


, and


110






The implant


1120


as shown in

FIGS. 108 and 109

, is similar to implant


1100


which is in turn similar to implant


1000


. Such similar details have already been described above and reference here is made to the unique orientation of the first and second wings


1122


and


1124


. These wings have longitudinal axis


1126


and


1128


respectfully. As can be seen in these figures, the first and second wings


1122


,


1124


have been rotated so that they both slope inwardly and if they were to continue out of the page of the drawing of

FIG. 108

, they would meet to form an A-frame structure as is evident from the end view of FIG.


109


. In this particular embodiment, as can be seen in

FIGS. 109 and 110

, the tab


1034


is provided an acute angle to the remainder of the second wing


1124


. Further, the groove


1018


formed in the implant is sloped in order to accept the second wing


1124


. Accordingly, this present implant


1120


is particularly suited for an application where the spinous process is wider adjacent to the vertebral body and then narrows in size at least some distance distally from the vertebral body. It is to be understood that a cross-section of this implant


1120


through sleeve


1016


can preferably be like

FIG. 93



a.






Embodiment of FIGS.


111


,


112


,


113


,


114


,


115


,


116


, and


117






An additional embodiment of the implant


1150


is shown in FIG.


111


. Implant


1150


has features similar to those described with respect to

FIG. 94



b.






Implant


1150


includes a central body


1152


with a first wing


1154


, where central body


1152


includes elongated groove


1156


which extends to the guide


1158


. A screw


1160


is received in a threaded bore located in the elongated groove


1156


.




The second wing


1162


includes a central body


1164


which is substantially perpendicular to the second wing


1162


.




The central body


1164


includes a plurality of bores


1166


provided therein. These bores are formed adjacent to each other in order to define a plurality of scallops, each scallop capable of retaining bolt


1160


therein. As can be seen in

FIG. 114

, the second wing includes a cut-out


1168


such that with the central body


1164


of the second wing received in the groove


1156


of the central body associated with the first wing, the remainder of the second wing is received over the central body


1152


of the implant


1150


. With this implant


1150


, the distance between the first and second wings can be adjusted by selectively placing the bolt


1160


through one of the five specified bores defined by the scalloped plurality of bores


1166


. Accordingly,

FIG. 112

depicts the implant where the first and second wings are widest apart in order to accommodate spinous processes of greater thickness.

FIG. 111

shows the middle position between the first and second wings in order to accommodate average size spinous processes.




It is to be understood that preferably during the surgical process, the central body


1152


is urged between spinous processes. After this has occurred, the second wing is guided by the other sides of the spinous processes from a path which causes the plane of the second wing to move substantially parallel to the plane of the first wing until the central body


1164


associated with the second wing


1162


is received in the groove of


1156


of the central body


1152


associated with the first wing


1154


. After this has occurred, the bolt


1160


is positioned through aligned bores associated with the second wing


1162


and the central body


1152


in order to secure the second wing to the central body.




While embodiment


1150


does not depict a sleeve such as sleeve


1016


, such a sleeve


1016


could be placed over body


1152


and be within the spirit of the invention.




Embodiments of FIGS.


119




a


,


119




b


,


120




a


,


120




b


,


121




a


,


121




b


,


122




a




122




b


,


122




c


,


123




a


,


123




b


,


124




a


,


124




b


, and


124




c






Implant


1200


of the invention is depicted in

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b


. This implant includes the first wing


1202


and sleeve


1204


and a guide


1206


. An alternative to this embodiment further includes, as required, second wing


1208


as depicted in

FIGS. 120



a


and


120




b.






As can be seen in

FIGS. 121



a


and


121




b


, the first wing


1202


includes a bore which receives a central body


1210


. Preferably, the central body is pressed fit through the bore of the first wing although it is to be understood that other securing mechanisms such as through the use of threads and still other mechanisms can be used to accomplish this task. Additionally, in this particular embodiment first and second pins


1212


extend from the first wing


1202


, each along an axis which is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis


1214


of the central body


1210


. In this particular embodiment, the distal end


1216


of the central body


1210


is threaded in order to be coupled to the guide


1206


.




As can be seen in

FIGS. 122



a


,


122




b


and


122




c


, the guide


1206


in this particular embodiment is pointed in order to allow the implant to be inserted between, and if necessary distract, adjacent spinous processes. The guide


206


includes a threaded bore


1218


which is designed to accept the threaded end


1216


of the central body


1210


in order to secure the guide to the central body and additionally for purposes of retaining the sleeve between the guide


1206


and the first wing


1202


.




As can be seen in

FIG. 123



a


the sleeve


1204


is preferably cylindrical, and oval or elliptical in shape in cross-section. It is to be understood that sleeve


1204


can have other shapes as described throughout the specification and be within the spirit and scope of the invention. In this particular embodiment, sleeve


1204


has at least one major diameter and one minor diameter in cross-section. Sleeve


1204


includes a central bore


1220


which extends the length of sleeve


1204


and curve grooves


1222


which are formed about central bore


1220


and extend only part way into the body of the sleeve. In this particular embodiment, the curved grooves


1222


describe an arc of about 60°. It is to be understood that in other embodiment, this arc can be less than 60° and extend past 120°.




The sleeve


1204


is received over the central body


1210


of the implant


1200


and can rotate thereon about the longitudinal axis


1214


of the central body


1210


. When this particular embodiment is assembled, the grooves


1222


have received therein the pins


1212


that extend from the first wing


1202


. Accordingly, the pins inserted in the grooves


1222


assist in the positioning of the sleeve relative to the remainder of the implant


1200


. With the pins


1212


received in the curved grooves


1222


, the pins limit the extent of the rotation of the sleeve about the central body and relative to the first wing.




As can be seen in

FIGS. 124



a


,


124




b


, and


124




c


, the sleeve is free to rotate relative to the longitudinal axis of the central body


1210


and thus relative to the first wing


1202


of the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b


. The sleeve can rotate relative to a second wing


1208


, when the second wing is utilized in conjunction with the embodiment of

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b


. The pins limit the rotation of the sleeve. In an alternative embodiment, the pins are eliminated so that the sleeve can rotate to any position relative to the first wing.




It is to be understood that the sleeve can be comprised of biologically acceptable material such as titanium. Additionally, it can be comprised of super-elastic material such as an alloy of nickel and titanium, much as described hereinabove with respect to other embodiments.




The great advantage of the use of the sleeve


1204


as depicted in the embodiment of

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b


is that the sleeve can be rotated and repositioned with respect to the first wing


1202


, and/or the second wing


1208


should the second wing be used in the embodiment, in order to more optimally position the implant


1200


between spinous processes. It is to be understood that the cortical bone or the outer shell of the spinous processes is stronger at an anterior position adjacent to the vertebral bodies of the vertebra that at a posterior position distally located from the vertebral bodies. Accordingly, there is some advantage of having the implant


1200


placed as close to the vertebral bodies as is possible. In order to facilitate this and to accommodate the anatomical form of the bone structures, as the implant is inserted between the vertebral bodies and urged toward the vertebral bodies, the sleeve


1204


can be rotated relative to the wings, such as wing


1202


, so that the sleeve is optimally positioned between the spinous processes, and the wing


1202


is optimally positioned relative to the spinous processes. Without this capability, depending on the anatomical form of the bones, it is possible for the wings to become somewhat less than optimally positioned relative to the spinous processes.




Embodiments of FIGS.


125


,


126


, and


127







FIGS. 125

,


126


and


127


depict three alternative embodiments of the invention as can be seen through a line parallel to line


124


-


124


of

FIG. 119



b.






In

FIG. 125

, the sleeve


1204


is rotatable about central body


1210


. In this embodiment, however, the sleeve


1204


design does not include the grooves


1222


as previously depicted in the embodiment shown in

FIG. 123



a


. Thus, without pins, the sleeve is completely free to rotate about the central body


1210


.




An alternative embodiment is shown in FIG.


126


. In this embodiment, the sleeve


1204


is essentially a thin wall cylinder which is spaced from the central body


1210


. Sleeve


1204


is free to move relative to central body


1210


. Sleeve


1204


can rotate relative to central body


1210


. In addition, sleeve


1204


can take a somewhat cocked or skewed position relative to central body


1210


.




A further embodiment, it is shown in FIG.


127


. This embodiment is somewhat similar to the embodiment shown in

FIG. 126

except that in this case, several pins project from the first wing in order to somewhat limit and restrict the motion of the sleeve


1204


. As shown in

FIG. 127

, four pins are depicted. It is to be understood however that such an embodiment can include one, two, three, four or more pins and be within the spirit and scope of the invention. It is to be understood that if the embodiment is used with a second wing, that similar pins can extend from the second wing. However, in the embodiment using a second wing, the pins would preferably be somewhat flexible so that they could snap into the inside of the sleeve


1204


as the second wing is inserted relative to the central body and secured in place. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 127

, the sleeve


1204


is free to rotate about the longitudinal axis of the central body


1210


and is somewhat restricted in this motion and its ability to become skewed relative to the longitudinal axis of the central body by the pins.




Embodiments of FIGS.


128


and


129






The embodiments of

FIG. 128

is an advantageous alternative to that of

FIG. 93



a


. In this embodiment, the central body


1002


is similar to that as shown in

FIG. 93



a


. The sleeve


116


is comprised of two sleeve portions


1016




a


and


1016




b


. The sleeve portions are preferably formed from flat stock material which is substantially easier to form than having the sleeve formed or machined from solid bar stock material. A further advantage of the sleeve


1016


, if formed of super-elastic material, is that the sleeve can be formed in a manner which optimizes the super-elastic characteristics of such material in order to enhance its ability to repeatedly deflect under load. In this particular embodiment, the sleeve portions


1016




a


and


1016




b


are somewhat C-shaped and then after being formed, are snapped into the grooves of the central body


1002


.




An alternative embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG.


128


. This embodiment is most favorably used with the embodiment of

FIGS. 119



a


and


119




b


. In this particular embodiment, the sleeve


1204


is designed to rotate about the central body


1210


. Sleeve


1204


includes a central member


1230


which includes a bore that receives the central body


1210


. The central member


1230


is rotatable about the central body


1210


of the implant


1200


. The central member


1230


includes first and second grooves


1232


and


1234


. These grooves can receive C-shaped sleeve members


1204




a


and


1204




b


. These C-shaped sleeve members are similar in construction and design to the C-shaped sleeve members shown above with respect to FIG.


128


. These sleeve members can be snapped into position relative to the central member


1230


of the sleeve


1204


. It is to be understood that other mechanisms can be used to secure the C-shaped sleeve member relative to the central member of the sleeve and be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Further, it is to be understood that the sleeve members


1204




a


and


1204




b


can be formed from a single flat stock material such that one of the grooves


1232


and


1234


receives continuous piece of flat material which has been appropriately bent and the other grooves receives two ends of the sleeve.




INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY




From the above, it is evident that the present invention can be used to relieve pain caused by spinal stenosis in the form of, by way of example only, central canal stenosis or foraminal (lateral) stenosis. These implants have the ability to flatten the natural curvature of the spine and open the neural foramen and the spacing between adjacent vertebra to relieve problems associated with the above-mentioned lateral and central stenosis. Additionally, the invention can be used to relieve pain associated with facet arthropathy. The present invention is minimally invasive and can be used on an outpatient basis.




Additional aspects, objects and advantages of the invention can be obtained through a review of the appendant claims and figures.




It is to be understood that other embodiments can be fabricated and come within the spirit and scope of the claims.



Claims
  • 1. An implant for relieving pain associated with at least one of the spinal column and associated tissues and structures, which implant is positionable between spinous processes of the spinal column, the implant comprising:a first wing with a central body extending therefrom, said central body having a longitudinal axis; a sleeve positioned over said central body with said sleeve being able to rotate about said longitudinal axis relative to said central body; and said sleeve has a circular cross-section in a plane which is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis.
  • 2. An implant for relieving pain associated with at least one of a spinal column and associated tissues and structures, the implant comprising:a first wing with a central body extending therefrom, said central body having a longitudinal axis, a sleeve positioned over said central body with said sleeve being able to rotate about said longitudinal axis relative to said central body; and wherein said sleeve is adapted to be positioned adjacent to said spinal column and between adjacent spinous processes.
  • 3. An implant for relieving pain associated with at least one of the spinal column and associated tissues and structures, which implant is positionable between spinous processes of the spinal column, the implant comprising:a first wing with a central body extending therefrom, said central body having a longitudinal axis; a sleeve positioned over said central body with said sleeve being able to rotate about said longitudinal axis relative to said central body; and said sleeve having a cross-section in a plane which is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, said cross-section having a shape substantially conforming to a space between spinous processes.
  • 4. An implant for relieving pain associated with at least one of the spinal column and associated tissues and structures, which implant is positionable between spinous processes of the spinal column, the implant comprising:a first wing with a central body extending therefrom, said central body having a longitudinal axis; a sleeve positioned over said central body with said sleeve being able to rotate about said longitudinal axis relative to said central body; said sleeve has a cross-section with a curved peripheral edge in a plane which is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis.
  • 5. An implant for relieving pain associated with at least one of the spinal column and associated tissues and structures, which implant is positionable between spinous processes of the spinal column, the implant comprising:a first wing with a central body extending therefrom, said central body having a longitudinal axis; a sleeve positioned over said central body with said sleeve being able to rotate about said longitudinal axis relative to said central body; and said sleeve has a cross-section with a curved peripheral edge.
  • 6. An implant for relieving pain associated with at least one of the spinal column and associated tissues and structures, which implant is positionable between spinous processes of the spinal column, the implant comprising:a first wing with a central body extending therefrom, said central body having a longitudinal axis; a sleeve positioned over said central body with said sleeve being able to rotate about said longitudinal axis relative to said central body; and said sleeve has a curved surface adapted to contact a spinous process.
  • 7. An implant for relieving pain associated with at least one of the spinal column and associated tissues and structures, which implant is positionable between spinous processes of the spinal column, the implant comprising:a first member with a central body extending therefrom, said central body having an axis; a sleeve positioned over said central body with said sleeve being able to rotate about said axis relative to said central body; wherein said sleeve is adapted to be positioned adjacent to said spinal column and between adjacent spinous processes.
  • 8. The implant of claim 7, wherein said sleeve has a cross-section with a curved peripheral edge.
  • 9. The implant of claim 7, wherein said sleeve has a cross-section having a shape substaintially conforming to a space between spinous processes.
  • 10. The implant of claim 7, wherein said sleeve has an elliptical cross-section.
  • 11. The implant of claim 7, wherein said sleeve has an ovoid cross-section.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/706,991 filed Nov. 6, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,332,883, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/473,173, filed Dec. 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,030, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/179,570, filed Oct. 27, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,048,342, which is a Continuation-in-Part of Ser. No. 09/175,645 filed Oct. 20, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,630, which is a Continuation-in-Part of Ser. No. 08/958,281, filed Oct. 27, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,860,977, which is a Continuation-in-Part of Ser. No. 08/778,093, filed Jan. 2, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,836,948.

US Referenced Citations (95)
Number Name Date Kind
2677369 Knowles May 1954 A
3426364 Lumb Feb 1969 A
3648691 Lumb et al. Mar 1972 A
3867728 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
3875595 Froning Apr 1975 A
4309777 Patil Jan 1982 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4369769 Edwards Jan 1983 A
4401112 Rezaian Aug 1983 A
4479491 Martin Oct 1984 A
4501269 Bagby Feb 1985 A
4553273 Wu Nov 1985 A
4554914 Kapp et al. Nov 1985 A
4599084 Nashef Jul 1986 A
4599086 Doty Jul 1986 A
4604995 Stephens et al. Aug 1986 A
4611582 Duff Sep 1986 A
4636217 Ogilvie et al. Jan 1987 A
4643178 Nastari et al. Feb 1987 A
4657550 Daher Apr 1987 A
4685447 Iversen et al. Aug 1987 A
4696290 Steffee Sep 1987 A
4714469 Kenna Dec 1987 A
4743256 Brantigan May 1988 A
4772287 Ray et al. Sep 1988 A
4790303 Steffee Dec 1988 A
4834757 Brantigan May 1989 A
4878915 Brantigan Nov 1989 A
4904260 Ray et al. Feb 1990 A
4904261 Dove et al. Feb 1990 A
4913134 Luque Apr 1990 A
4932975 Main et al. Jun 1990 A
4936848 Bagby Jun 1990 A
4946378 Hirayama et al. Aug 1990 A
4961740 Ray et al. Oct 1990 A
4969888 Scholten et al. Nov 1990 A
5011484 Breard Apr 1991 A
5015247 Michelson May 1991 A
5026373 Ray et al. Jun 1991 A
5035716 Downey Jul 1991 A
5047055 Bao et al. Sep 1991 A
5055104 Ray Oct 1991 A
5059193 Kuslich Oct 1991 A
5059194 Michelson Oct 1991 A
5084049 Asher et al. Jan 1992 A
5092866 Breard et al. Mar 1992 A
5123926 Pisharodi Jun 1992 A
5167662 Hayes et al. Dec 1992 A
5180381 Aust et al. Jan 1993 A
5192327 Brantigan Mar 1993 A
5258031 Salib et al. Nov 1993 A
5263953 Bagby Nov 1993 A
5290312 Kojimoto et al. Mar 1994 A
5304178 Stahurski Apr 1994 A
5306309 Wagner et al. Apr 1994 A
5352225 Yuan et al. Oct 1994 A
5387213 Breard et al. Feb 1995 A
5390683 Pisharodi Feb 1995 A
5395372 Holt et al. Mar 1995 A
5415661 Holmes May 1995 A
5443514 Steffee Aug 1995 A
5458638 Kuslich et al. Oct 1995 A
5458641 Ramirez Jimenez Oct 1995 A
5458643 Oka et al. Oct 1995 A
5470333 Ray Nov 1995 A
5496318 Howland et al. Mar 1996 A
5505732 Michelson Apr 1996 A
5514180 Heggeness et al. May 1996 A
5534028 Bao et al. Jul 1996 A
5534029 Shima Jul 1996 A
5540689 Sanders et al. Jul 1996 A
5549679 Kuslich Aug 1996 A
5562736 Ray et al. Oct 1996 A
5593409 Michelson Jan 1997 A
5609634 Voydeville Mar 1997 A
5645597 Krapiva Jul 1997 A
5645599 Samani Jul 1997 A
5653761 Pisharodi Aug 1997 A
5674295 Ray et al. Oct 1997 A
5674296 Bryan et al. Oct 1997 A
5676702 Ratron Oct 1997 A
5702455 Saggar Dec 1997 A
5725582 Bevan et al. Mar 1998 A
5766252 Henry et al. Jun 1998 A
5824098 Stein Oct 1998 A
5865846 Bryan et al. Feb 1999 A
5885299 Winslow Mar 1999 A
5888224 Beckers et al. Mar 1999 A
5888226 Rogozinski Mar 1999 A
5976186 Bao et al. Nov 1999 A
6001130 Bryan et al. Dec 1999 A
6022376 Assell et al. Feb 2000 A
6113639 Ray et al. Sep 2000 A
6156067 Bryan et al. Dec 2000 A
6234705 Troxell May 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (31)
Number Date Country
2015507 Jan 1991 CA
2821 678 Nov 1979 DE
31 13 142 Jan 1982 DE
140790 May 1985 EP
146347 Jun 1985 EP
322334 Jun 1989 EP
0677277 Oct 1995 EP
0767636 Apr 1997 EP
1139268 Oct 2001 EP
2 681 525 Mar 1993 FR
2707864 Jan 1995 FR
2717675 Sep 1995 FR
2722980 Feb 1996 FR
2780269 Dec 1999 FR
2782911 Mar 2000 FR
2806614 Sep 2001 FR
2806616 Sep 2001 FR
1484348 Jun 1989 RU
WO 9000037 Jan 1990 WO
WO 9116018 Oct 1991 WO
WO 9421185 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9426192 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9848717 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9926562 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9940866 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9942051 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9959669 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0004851 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0013619 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0013620 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0128442 Apr 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Haruo Tsuji, et al., Ceramic Interspinous Block (CISB) Assisted Anterior Interbody Fusion, Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 77-86, ©1990 Raven Press, Ltd., New York.
Richard W. Porter, MD, FRCS, FRCSE, Spinal Stenosis and Neurogenic Claudication, SPINE vol. 21, No. 17, pp. 2046-2052, ©1996, Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
Minns, R.J., et al., Preliminary Design and Experimental Studies of a Novel Soft Implant for Correcting Sagittal Plane Instability in the Lumbar Spine, SPINE vol. 22, No. 16, pp. 1819-1825, ©1997, Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
Waldemar Link, brochure entitled Wirbelsäulen-Chirurgie: Instrumentarium Und Implantate Zur Wirbelsäulen-Chirurgie (Spinal Surgery: Instrumentation and Implants for Spinal Surgery), Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany.
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/706991 Nov 2000 US
Child 09/842755 US
Parent 09/473173 Dec 1999 US
Child 09/706991 US
Parent 09/179570 Oct 1998 US
Child 09/473173 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/175645 Oct 1998 US
Child 09/179570 US
Parent 08/958281 Oct 1997 US
Child 09/175645 US
Parent 08/778093 Jan 1997 US
Child 08/958281 US