The present invention generally relates to a spine stabilization system. In particular, certain embodiments are directed to an integrated stabilization member having increased torsional strength.
The human spine is particularly important because it protects the spinal cord, which is responsible for relaying electrical impulses from the brain to the rest of the body. Occasionally, an accident or other outside force may cause the vertebrae which make up the spine to be broken, cracked, or chipped. Each of these situations are dangerous, and are handled by the most skilled physicians and surgeons. The remedy for a broken, cracked, or chipped bone may be different for every individual, and may change according to the situation under which the injury occurred.
One situation that commonly arises occurs is when vertebrae or portions of vertebrae or spine are broken, cracked, or are beginning to fail to function normally. One treatment technique used by doctors to remedy this situation involves using a pair of rods that are connected to several vertebrae. The rods may be aligned along the periphery of the vertebrae, and are typically used to maintain the alignment of the bones. This may allow the vertebrae to re-grow bony tissue or cartilage. In addition, aligning the vertebrae allows them to heal properly, and prevents movement of the spine from injuring the spinal cord.
In order to prevent the movement of the spine, a fixation system is often used to hold the two rods together. The fixation system allows the rods to be fixed in place under normal conditions. Many fixation devices are currently available. They vary in shape, size, and their approach to preventing the rods from moving. One type of device that has been used involves a single connection body that lies in between the two rods, over the body of the vertebrae. Though this device serves the purpose of preventing the rods from moving, it also has several disadvantages. For example, many of these devices are unable to move, rendering them unable to adapt to the contour of the spine. Another limitation of these devices is that they typically do not allow for clearance of the body of the vertebrae, which can cause damage to the vertebrae or cause the device to protrude from underneath a person's skin.
Many devices hold the rods in place by gripping them from the outer portion of the bars. These devices also achieve the purpose of holding the bars in place, but have several limitations. For instance, these devices often may not be capable of achieving the same degree of grip on the rods as compared to a configuration that grips the bars from the inner area, between the bars.
Other devices have aimed to eliminate the limitations of their predecessors by providing two connecting bodies that have a small degree of adjustability. However, many of these devices are unable to translate axially, which prevents them from adjusting to the spacing between the rods. Other devices are unable to rotate to adjust for rods that aren't coplanar. Additionally, these devices often do not have the ability to rotate freely, preventing them from adjusting to the contours of the spine. Devices such as these may provide greater adjustability at the expense of increased complexity, number of components, increased overall height, or other limitations and disadvantages.
A continuing need exists for a spinal fixation system that is able to adjust the contours of the spine, is simple to install and meets the demanding mechanical loads that are experienced when implanted in a patient.
Spine stabilization systems and integrated rods are disclosed. One spine stabilization system has at least four bone anchors and a stabilization member attached to the bone anchors. The stabilization member has first and second elongate portions interconnected by a connector portion. The first and second elongate members extend longitudinally and generally parallel to a central longitudinal axis and connector portion extends transverse to the central longitudinal axis from a first lateral end to a second lateral end. The connector portion is integrally connected to the first and second elongate portions such that there is no relative movement between the lateral ends and the respective elongate portion to which each end is attached.
In one variation, the width of the connector portion adjacent to the elongate portions is less than 5 mm when viewed from the side. In another variation, the connecting portion is fixably telescopingly extendable in the lateral direction transverse to the central longitudinal axis to selectably vary the lateral separation of the elongate portions and all other degrees of freedom are fixed.
Embodiments of the present invention are generally directed to a spine stabilization system. In particular, certain embodiments are directed to an integrated stabilization member having increased torsional strength.
Referring now to
The opposing ends 20, 22 of connector portion 16 are generally rigidly or fixedly connected to elongate members 12, 14 such that there is no relative movement between the ends 20, 22 and the respective elongate members 12, 14 to which each end is attached. In one variation, elongated members 12, 14 and connector portion 16 may be a unitary construction manufactured from the same block of material. In another embodiment, connector portion 16 may be manufactured to be immovably connected to elongate members 12, 14 by welding. In one variation, a laser weld may be used to fix connector portion 16 to elongate members 12, 14. In this regard, as shown in
Referring to
In one embodiment of a laterally telescoping stabilization member 10, connector portion 16 comprises an extender arm portion 24 telescopingly received within a receiver arm portion 26. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In one embodiment, best shown in
According to some embodiments, as shown in
Referring now to
In another variation, the appropriate rod contour and length of the stabilization member 10 may be determined using a rod template. If necessary, one or both of the elongate members or rods 12, 14 may be bent or contoured using a rod bender. A rod cutter may also be used to cut the implant to the appropriate length.
As shown in
Stabilization members 10 according to the invention may comprise any material, or combination of materials suitable for implantation in the human body. The materials may include, but are not limited to, a metal or alloy. In some embodiments, steel, titanium, iron, and the like may be used. The type of material that is used may be chosen such that it has sufficient strength to maintain the elongate members 12, 14 in a substantially fixed manner under normal conditions. Normal conditions, as described, will be understood to be conditions that a healthy spine may be subjected to without causing the structural integrity of the vertebrae to be compromised. For example, it is estimated that the torsional stiffness of the human thoracolumbar spine is about 1.2 N-m per degree of axial rotation and cyclical torsional loads producing more than +/−1.5° of angular displacement per spinal segment are detrimental to elements of the lumbar spine. As a result, it is estimated that the maximum torque that will be effectively resisted by the thoracolumbar spine is about 1.8 N-m. Thus, using a material that is capable of maintaining its structural integrity when subjected to the conditions present inside the human body is desired. In one embodiment, stabilization member 10 is made from a titanium alloy and the torsional stiffness is at least 4 N-m/degree. Those skilled in the art may appreciate that such a relatively increased torsional stiffness may reduce torsional load on screws, minimizing the risk of construct break-down.
In a static torsional test method used conforming to ASTM standard F1717, five constructs similar to that shown in
While it is apparent that the invention disclosed herein is well calculated to fulfill the objects stated above, it will be appreciated that numerous modifications and embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/326,033, filed Jul. 8, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 13/731,558, filed Dec. 31, 2012, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,808,332, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/982,402, filed Dec. 30, 2010, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,366,750, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/014,025, filed on Jan. 14, 2008, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,892,258, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4443677 | DeSaw | Apr 1984 | A |
5312405 | Korotko et al. | May 1994 | A |
5669910 | Korhonen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5947966 | Drewry et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6083226 | Fiz | Jul 2000 | A |
6113600 | Drummond et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6210413 | Justis | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217578 | Crozet | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6749614 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6872208 | McBride et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7892258 | Iott | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8021398 | Sweeney et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20050240265 | Kuiper et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060241602 | Jackson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070233090 | Naifeh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233094 | Colleran et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090048601 | Forton | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110208310 | Aschmann | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0451765 | Oct 1991 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160338743 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14326033 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 15227484 | US | |
Parent | 13731558 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 14326033 | US | |
Parent | 12982402 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13731558 | US | |
Parent | 12014025 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12982402 | US |