1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to injection molding systems and, more particularly, to the prevention of drool in an injection molding system.
2. Background of the Invention
In many injection molding systems available today, the systems comprise an injection molding machine having a machine nozzle making contact with a sprue bushing to transfer molten material to a mold via a runner system, such as a cold runner or a hot runner. In the event that the machine nozzle has to be disengaged from making contact with the sprue bushing molten plastic will drool backwards from the sprue bushing, and this will adversely affect the next shot of melt. This situation can happen in many applications, such as for example with shuttle molds, rotary molds, and stack molds.
Due to residual pressures in the system, molten material tends to leak, or “drool”, from the sprue bushing at the end of the injection cycle, i.e., when the machine nozzle is retracted from the sprue bushing inlet. Not only does this drool waste material and increase production costs, but the drooled material may collect on the mold and prevent complete closing thereof or cause permanent damage thereto.
Many techniques and devices exist in the art that are designed to prevent or reduce drool in an injection molding system. Examples include various shut-off mechanisms located at the machine nozzle tip or spindle elements for use in a suck-back procedure. In many cases, the machine nozzle incorporates an anti-drool mechanism into its structure, as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,934,626 to Hall, incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto.
However, there exists a need to have an anti-drool mechanism that can be added as a modular component to existing injection molding systems, including stack molding systems.
Accordingly, an anti-drool mechanism suitable for use in an injection molding system using a retractable machine nozzle is provided herein. An injection molding machine has a machine nozzle for injecting a melt stream into a manifold. Between the machine nozzle and the manifold is an anti-drool mechanism, which includes a melt inlet configured to engage with the machine nozzle, a melt passage, and a fixed pin disposed within the melt passage. The fixed pin is sized so that the melt stream will flow around the pin. The fixed pin has a head configured to be received within the machine nozzle. An actuated shut-off collar is also disposed within the melt passage, surrounding the pin. The shut-off collar includes a sealing surface that is configured to cut off the flow of the melt stream into the melt passage and subsequently into the manifold melt channel when the sealing surface engages with a coordinating sealing surface on the head of the fixed pin.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, illustrate the present invention and, together with the description, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention.
Specific embodiments of the present invention are now described with reference to the figures, where like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
Referring first to
Referring now to
In the embodiment illustrated in
A shut-off collar 114 is disposed around fixed pin 109 at the end thereof nearest to machine nozzle 102. Shut-off collar 114 is movable, in that shut-off collar 114 can be manipulated towards manifold 104 and back to its original position by an actuation mechanism. While any actuation mechanism known in the art is appropriate for the present invention, such as pneumatic, hydraulic, electromechanical, or mechanical (e.g., cam and lever), shut-off collar 114 of one embodiment is spring-loaded, so that it is biased towards machine nozzle 102 by a biasing spring 118. This actuation will be described in greater detail below.
Shut-off collar 114 can have any shape that is capable of sealing the interface between machine nozzle 102 and fixed pin 109, but in an embodiment of the present invention shut-off collar 114 includes a ring-like structure with a sealing surface 115 at one end thereof. Sealing surface 115 is configured to prevent the flow of melt into anti-drool mechanism melt passage 108 by coming into contact with a coordinating sealing surface 111 on pin head portion 110. In order to seal melt passage 108 and prevent drool, the diameter of sealing surface 115 and the diameter of coordinating sealing surface 111 must be equal or approximately equal to each other.
In an embodiment of the present invention, shut-off collar 114 includes a sleeve 116 that extends into anti-drool mechanism melt passage 108. The sleeve 116 of shut-off collar 114 helps to guide the motion thereof. The shape of shut-off collar 114 can be seen more clearly in
Biasing spring 118 can be any conventional spring known in the art, such as a series of stacked Belleville washers, a helical compression spring, or the like. Biasing spring 118 must have a spring constant sufficient to consistently return shut-off collar 114 to a closed position. Biasing spring 118 must also be sufficiently rigorous to withstand a high number of cyclic compressions.
Sealing surface 115 of shut-off collar 114 is disposed between a locating ring 120 and a stroke limiting nut 122. Locating ring 120 limits the motion of shut-off collar 114 in the direction of the machine nozzle 102, so as to ensure that biasing spring 118 correctly positions sealing surface 115 in contact with coordinating sealing surface 111 on pin head portion 110. Similarly, stroke limiting nut 122 limits the motion of shut-off collar 114 in the direction of manifold 104 to prevent unnecessary wear on biasing spring 118.
The functioning of anti-drool mechanism 106 will now be described in greater detail with reference to
In this embodiment, at the end of the melt shot, machine nozzle 102 retracts to the position shown in
The embodiment described herein includes the use of a retractable machine nozzle. However, the present invention is not so limited. When a non-retractable machine nozzle is used, or when the operation does not require that the machine nozzle be retracted between shots, one of the other actuation mechanisms should be used, such as a pneumatic, hydraulic, electromechanical, or mechanical actuation system. As the motion of the machine nozzle will not be available to compress and release the spring of the spring-loaded shut-off collar, an actuation mechanism with external control is necessary.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents. All patents and publications discussed herein are incorporated in their entirety by reference thereto.
The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/458,410 filed Mar. 31, 2003. The disclosure of this referenced application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2514390 | Hagen | Jul 1950 | A |
2928125 | Smucker et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3049757 | Hagerborg | Aug 1962 | A |
3146282 | Ninneman | Aug 1964 | A |
3270115 | Nouel | Aug 1966 | A |
3315899 | Quarve | Apr 1967 | A |
3719310 | Hunten | Mar 1973 | A |
3758248 | Drazick | Sep 1973 | A |
3902665 | Hendry | Sep 1975 | A |
3934626 | Hall | Jan 1976 | A |
4273525 | Reitan | Jun 1981 | A |
4299791 | Aoki | Nov 1981 | A |
4394117 | Taylor | Jul 1983 | A |
4674968 | Durst | Jun 1987 | A |
4678427 | Fritzsche | Jul 1987 | A |
4768283 | Gellert | Sep 1988 | A |
4899435 | Trakas | Feb 1990 | A |
4917594 | Gellert et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917595 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5012839 | Rogers et al. | May 1991 | A |
5094603 | Gellert | Mar 1992 | A |
5151025 | Muller | Sep 1992 | A |
5229145 | Brown et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5370523 | Kushnir | Dec 1994 | A |
5458843 | Brown et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5460510 | Gellert | Oct 1995 | A |
5464579 | Brown et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470219 | Yokoyama et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5484275 | Kushnir | Jan 1996 | A |
5720433 | Forker | Feb 1998 | A |
5785915 | Osuna-Diaz | Jul 1998 | A |
5955121 | Gellert et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968562 | Schad et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975127 | Dray | Nov 1999 | A |
6062841 | Gellert et al. | May 2000 | A |
6135757 | Jenko | Oct 2000 | A |
6270711 | Gellert et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6348171 | Dewar et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361300 | Kazmer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6413076 | Dray, Sr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6533021 | Shibata et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6585505 | Kazmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6739863 | Olaru | May 2004 | B2 |
6835060 | Sicilia | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6910877 | Berceanu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7182893 | Olaru | Feb 2007 | B2 |
20020121713 | Moss et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20060204610 | Nakaya et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1554847 | Jan 1970 | DE |
55017569 | Feb 1980 | JP |
60168619 | Sep 1985 | JP |
60240425 | Nov 1985 | JP |
5185473 | Jul 1993 | JP |
2003127186 | May 2003 | JP |
WO 9954109 | Oct 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040191357 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60458410 | Mar 2003 | US |