Stabilized immunogenic HBc chimer particles

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0002] The present invention relates to the intersection of the fields of immunology and protein engineering, and particularly to a chimeric hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleocapsid protein (HBc) that is useful as the immunogen in a vaccine and contains one or both of a C-terminal and an N-terminal cysteine residue and the replacement of one or both of the cysteine residues that are present in the native sequence at HBc positions 48 and 107.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] The family hepadnaviridae are enveloped DNA-containing animal viruses that can cause hepatitis B in humans (HBV). The hepadnavirus family includes hepatitis B viruses of other mammals, e.g., woodchuck (WHV), and ground squirrel (GSHV), and avian viruses found in ducks (DHV) and herons (HeHV). Hepatitis B virus (HBV) used herein refers to a member of the family hepadnaviridae that infects mammals, as compared to a virus that infects an avian host, unless the discussion refers to a specific example of a non-mammalian virus.

[0004] The nucleocapsid or core of the mammalian hepatitis B virus (HBV or hepadnavirus) contains a sequence of 183 or 185 amino acid residues, depending on viral subtype, whereas the duck virus capsid contains 262 amino acid residues. Hepatitis B core protein monomers of the several hepadnaviridae self-assemble in infected cells into stable aggregates known as hepatitis B core protein particles (HBc particles). Two three-dimensional structures are reported for HBc particles. A first that comprises a minor population contains 90 copies of the HBC subunit protein as dimers or 180 individual monomeric proteins, and a second, major population that contains 120 copies of the HBc subunit protein as dimers or 240 individual monomeric proteins. These particles are referred to as T=3 or T=4 particles, respectively, wherein “T” is the triangulation number. These HBc particles of the human-infecting virus (human virus) are about 30 or 34 nm in diameter, respectively. Pumpens et al. (1995) Intervirology, 38:63-74; and Metzger et al. (1998) J. Gen. Viol., 79:587-590.

[0005] Conway et al., (1997) Nature, 386:91-94, describe the structure of human HBc particles at 9 Angstrom resolution, as determined from cryo-electron micrographs. Bottcher et al. (1997), Nature, 386:88-91, describe the polypeptide folding for the human HBc monomers, and provide an approximate numbering scheme for the amino acid residues at which alpha-helical regions and their linking loop regions form. Zheng et al. (1992), J. Biol. Chem., 267(13):9422-9429 report that core particle formation is not dependent upon the arginine-rich C-terminal domain, the binding of nucleic acids or the formation of disulfide bonds based on their study of mutant proteins lacking one or more cysteines and others' work with C-terminal-truncated proteins [Birnbaum et al., (1990) J. Virol. 64:3319-3330].

[0006] The hepatitis B nucleocapsid or viral core protein (HBc) has been disclosed as an immunogenic carrier moiety that stimulates the T cell response of an immunized host animal. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,527, U.S. Pat. No. 4,882,145 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,143,726. A particularly useful application of this carrier is its ability to present foreign or heterologous B cell epitopes at the site of the immunodominant loop that is present at about residue positions 70-90, and more usually recited as about positions 75 through 85 from the amino-terminus (N-terminus) of the protein. Clarke et al. (1991) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 91, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.313-318.

[0007] During viral replication, HBV nucleocapsids associate with the viral RNA pre-genome, the viral reverse transcriptase (Pol), and the terminal protein (derived from Pol) to form replication competent cores. The association between the nucleocapsid and the viral RNA pre-genome is mediated by an arginine-rich domain at the carboxyl-terminus (C-terminus). When expressed in heterologous expression systems, such as E. coli where viral RNA pre-genome is absent, the protamine-like C-terminus; i.e., residues at positions 150 through 183, can bind E. coli RNA. Zheng et al. (1992) JBC, 267(13): 9422-9429.

[0008] HBcAg is a particulate protein derived from the hepatitis B virus that has been proposed as a carrier for heterologous epitopes. The relative immunogenicity of HBsAg (HBs) has been compared with HBcAg (HBc), and the ability of each to evoke immune responses in different genetic backgrounds [Milich et al., Science, (1986) 234(4782): 1398-1401]. These data emphasize the higher immunogenicity of HBc relative to HBs, and the universal responsiveness to HBc, irrespective of genetic background.

[0009] For example, HBc is more than 300 times more immunogenic than HBs in BALB/c mice; and, although both B10.S and B10.M mice are non-responders to HBs, every strain tested is responsive to HBc. These results re-emphasize the suitability of HBc as a vaccine carrier and specifically, its superiority over HBs, hence the selection of HBc as opposed to HBs to carry heterologous epitopes.

[0010] Another advantage of the HBc carrier is the fact that it may not require potent adjuvants for efficacy. This is due to the high inherent immunogenicity of the particle. A comparison of the immunogenicity of HBc-P. berghei particles showed that alum, which is approved for human use, was more effective than either IFA or CFA [Schodel et al., J. Exp. Med., (1994) 180(3): p. 1037-46]. The importance of this observation is highlighted by toxicity problems associated with newer, more complex adjuvants as was recently noted in clinical trials of SKB's candidate malaria vaccine [Stoute et al., N. Engl. J. Med., [1997] 336(2): p. 86-91].

[0011] In an application as a vaccine carrier moiety, it is preferable that the HBV nucleocapsids not bind nucleic acid derived from the host. Birnbaum et al. (1990) J. Virol., 64:3319-3330 showed that the protamine-like C-terminal domain of HBV nucleocapsids could be deleted without interfering with the protein's ability to assemble into virus-like particles. It is thus reported that proteins truncated to about position 144, i.e., containing the HBc sequence from position one through about 144, can self-assemble, whereas deletions beyond residue 139 abrogate capsid assembly [Birnbaum et al., (1990) J. Virl., 64: 3319-3330; Seifer et al., (1995) Intervirology, 38:47-62].

[0012] Zlotnick et al., (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 94:9556-9561 studied the assembly of full length and truncated HBc proteins in to particles. In addition to discussing full length molecules, those authors reported the preparation of a truncated protein that contained the HBc sequence from position 1 through 149 in which the cysteines at positions 48, 61 and 107 were each replaced by alanines and in which a cysteine residue was added at the C-terminus (position 150). That C-terminal mercaptan was used for linkage to a gold atom cluster for labeling in electron microscopy.

[0013] More recently, Metzger et al. (1998) J. Gen. Viol., 79:587-590 reported that the proline at position 138 (Pro-138 or P138) of the human viral sequence is required for particle formation. Those authors also reported that assembly capability of particles truncated at the carboxy-terminus to lengths of 142 and 140 residues was affected, with assembly capability being completely lost with truncations resulting in lengths of 139 and 137 residues.

[0014] Several groups have shown that truncated particles exhibit reduced stability relative to standard hepatitis B core particles [Galena et al. (1989) J. Virol., 63:4645-4652; Inada, et al. (1989) Virus Res., 14:27-48], evident by variability in particle sizes and the presence of particle fragments in purified preparations [Maassen et al., (1994) Arch. Virol., 135:131-142]. Thus, prior to the report of Metzger et al., above, Pumpens et al., (1995) Intervirology, 38:63-74 summarized the literature reports by stating that the carboxy-terminal border for HBc sequences required for self-assembly was located between amino acid residues 139 and 144, and that the first two or three amino-terminal residues could be replaced by other sequences, but elimination of four or eleven amino-terminal residues resulted in the complete disappearance of chimeric protein in transformed E. coli cells.

[0015] Recombinantly-produced hybrid HBc particles bearing internal insertions (referred to in the art as HBc chimeric particles or HBc chimers) of various polypeptide sequences have been prepared by heterologous expression in a wide variety of organisms, including E. coli, B.subtilis, Vaccinia, Salmonella typhimurium, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. See, for example Pumpens et al. (1995) Intervirology, 38:63-74, and the citations therein that note the work of several research groups.

[0016] Such HBc chimers often appear to have a less ordered structure, when analyzed by electron microscopy, compared to particles that lack heterologous epitopes [Schodel et al., (1994) J. Exp. Med., 180:1037-1046]. In some cases the insertion of heterologous epitopes into C-terminally truncated HBc particles has such a dramatic destabilizing affect that hybrid particles cannot be recovered following heterologous expression [Schodel et al. (1994) Infect. Immunol., 62:1669-1676). Thus, many chimeric HBc particles are so unstable that they fall apart during purification to such an extent that they are unrecoverable or they show very poor stability characteristics, making them problematic for vaccine development.

[0017] The above Pumpens et al. (1995) Intervirology, 38:63-74 report lists particle-forming chimers in which the inserted polypeptide sequence is at the N-terminus, the C-terminus and between the termini. Insert lengths reported in that article are 24 to 50 residues at the N-terminus, 7 to 43 residues internally, and 11 to 741 residues at the C-terminus.

[0018] Kratz et al., (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 96:1915-1920 recently described the E. coli expression of chimeric HBc particles comprised of a truncated HBc sequence internally fused to the 238-residue green fluorescent protein (GFP). This chimer contained the inserted GFP sequence flanked by a pair of glycine-rich flexible linker arms replacing amino acid residues 79 and 80 of HBc. Those particles were said to effectively elicit antibodies against native GFP in rabbits as host animals.

[0019] U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,085 describes two fusion proteins formed from an antigenic bovine inhibin peptide fused into (i) the immunodominant loop between residues 78 and 79 and (ii) after residue 144 of carboxy-terminal truncated HBc. Expressed fusion proteins were said to induce the production of anti-inhibin antibodies when administered in a host animal. The titers thirty days after immunization reported in that patent are relatively low, being 1:3000-15,000 for the fusion protein with the loop insertion and 1:100-125 for the insertion after residue 144.

[0020] U.S. Pat. No. 6,231,864 teaches the preparation and use of a strategically modified hepatitis B core protein that is linked to a hapten. The modified core protein contains an insert of one to about 40 residues in length that contains a chemically-reactive amino acid residue to which the hapten is pendently linked.

[0021] Recently published WO 01/27281 teaches that the immune response to HBc can be changed from a Th1 response to a Th2 response by the presence or absence, respectively, of the C-terminal cysteine-containing sequence of the native molecule. That disclosure also opines that disulfide formation by C-terminal cysteines could help to stabilize the particles. The presence of several residues of the native HBc sequence immediately upstream of the C-terminal cysteine was said to be preferred, but not required. One such alternative that might be used to replace a truncated C-terminal HBc sequence was said to include a C-terminal cysteine and an optional sequence that defines an epitope from a protein other than HBc.

[0022] Published PCT application WO 01/98333 teaches the deletion of one or more of the four arginine repeats present at the C-terminus of native HBc, while maintaining the C-terminal cysteine residue. That application also teaches that the deleted region can be replaced by an epitope from a protein other than HBc so that the HBc portion of the molecule so formed acts as a carrier for the added epitope.

[0023] Published PCT applications corresponding to WO 02/13765 A2 and WO 02/14478 A2 of one of the present inventors teach that stabilization of C-terminally truncated HBc particles can be achieved through the use of one or more added cysteine residues in the chimer proteins from which the particles are assembled. Those added cysteine residues are taught to be at or near the C-terminus of the chimeric protein.

[0024] A structural feature whereby the stability of full-length HBc particles could be retained, while abrogating the nucleic acid binding ability of full-length HBc particles, would be highly beneficial in vaccine development using the hepadnaviral nucleocapsid delivery system. Indeed, Ulrich et al. in their recent review of the use of HBc chimers as carriers for foreign epitopes [Adv. Virus Res., 50: 141-182 (1998) Academic Press] note three potential problems to be solved for use of those chimers in human vaccines. A first potential problem is the inadvertent transfer of nucleic acids in a chimer vaccine to an immunized host. A second potential problem is interference from preexisting immunity to HBc. A third possible problem relates to the requirement of reproducible preparation of intact chimer particles that can also withstand long-term storage.

[0025] The above four published PCT applications appear to contain teachings that can be used to overcome the potential problems disclosed by Ulrich et al. As disclosed hereinafter, the present invention provides another HBc chimer that provides unexpectedly high titers of antibodies, and in one aspect also provides a solution to the problems of HBc chimer stability as well as the substantial absence of nucleic acid binding ability of the construct. In addition, a contemplated recombinant chimer exhibits minimal, if any, antigenicity toward preexisting anti-HBc antibodies.

[0026] The above particle instability findings related to N-terminal truncated HBc chimer molecules notwithstanding, Neirynck et al., (October 1999) Nature Med., 5(10):1157-1163 reported that particle formation occurred in E. coli expression of a HBc chimer that contained the N-terminal 24-residue portion of the influenza M2 protein fused at residue 5 to full length HBc. It is noted that residue 4 of HBc is identical to residue 24 of the M2 sequence so it can also be said that those workers deleted residues 1-3.

[0027] The previously discussed use of hybrid HBc proteins with truncated C-termini for vaccine applications offers several advantages over their full-length counterparts, including enhanced expression levels and lack of bound E. coli RNA. However, C-terminally truncated particles engineered to display heterologous epitopes are often unstable, resulting in particles that either fail to associate into stable particulate structures following expression, or that readily dissociate into non-particulate structures during and/or following purification. Such a lack of stability is exhibited by particles comprised of chimeric HBc molecules that are C-terminally truncated to HBc position 149 and also contain residues inserted into the immunogenic loop at residue positions 70 through 80.

[0028] Others have reported that in wild type hepadnaviral core antigens a cysteine residue upstream of the HBcAg start codon is directly involved in the prevention of particle formation [Schodel et al. (Jan. 15, 1993) J. Biol. Chem., 268(2):1332-1337; Wasenauer et al. (March 1993) J. Virol., 67(3):1315-1322; and Nassal et al. (July 1993) J. Virol., 67(7):4307-4315]. All three groups reported that in wild type HBeAg, the cysteine residue at position −7 of the pre-core sequence, which is present when the core gene is translated from an upstream initiator methionine at position −30, is responsible for preventing particle formation and therefore facilitating the transition from particulate HBcAg to secreted, non-particulate HBeAg.

[0029] Bachmann and co-workers (Jegerlehner et al., (2002) Vaccine, 20:3104-3112] compared a fusion construct substantially identical to that of Neirynck et al. above, with a coupled construct similar to that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,231,864 to one o the present inventors in which the external 23-residues of the M2 protein of influenza A was coupled via a linker to a lysine residue engineered into the loop of a C-terminally truncated HBc (1-149). In that conjugate, the residues of HBc loop positions 79 and 80 (proline and alanine) were replaced by a pentapeptide containing two glycine residues on either side of a lysine residue. That chimer of Bachmann et al. also had the cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 replaced by serine residues. The authors' results after immunizations indicated an increase in anti-M2 titers and enhanced survival (6/6 vs. 0/3) for the coupled construct over the N-terminal fusion protein.

[0030] Those chimer proteins were said to form particles and to be capable of being linked to a polypeptide or protein hapten. The E. coli-expressed particles were purified by gel filtration and hydroxyapatite column. Correct assembly of the particles was said to be evidenced by the presence of single bands on agarose gel electrophoresis using ethidium bromide or Coomassie blue staining. However, examination of the provided figures appears to show at least two smears for the modified HBc chimers as compared to the native HBc particles. Each of the SDS-PAGE gels shown in the article was conducted under reducing conditions so that only substituted and unsubstituted chimer monomers were visible, as compared to assembled particles and monomers.

[0031] As disclosed hereinafter, the present invention provides one solution to the problems of HBc chimer stability as well as the substantial absence of nucleic acid binding ability of the construct, while providing powerfully immunogenic materials.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0032] The present invention contemplates an immunogen for a vaccine or inoculum comprised of a recombinantly engineered hepadnavirus nucleocapsid protein; i.e., a hepatitis B core (HBc) chimeric protein [also referred to herein as a recombinant chimer HBc protein molecule, a chimer hepatitis B core protein molecule, a HBc chimer molecule or just a chimer] that self-assembles into particles after expression by a host cell. A contemplated chimer molecule can be truncated at least at the C-terminus relative to a native core molecule that usually terminates at about residue position 183.

[0033] A contemplated recombinant chimer hepatitis B core (HBc) protein molecule is up to about 600 amino acid residues in length. That chimer contains (a) an HBc sequence of at least about 125 of the N-terminal 183, and preferably 163 amino acid residues of the HBc molecule, or more preferably the N-terminal 156 amino acid residues of the HBc molecule and most preferably the N-terminal 149 amino acid residues of the HBc molecule, including the HBc sequence of residue positions 4 through about 75 and about 85 through about 140 in which one or both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 is replaced by another residue.

[0034] A contemplated chimer molecule also contains (b) one or both of (i) one to three cysteine residues at an amino acid position of the chimer molecule corresponding to amino acid position −20 to about +1 from the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 [N-terminal cysteine residue(s)] in a sequence other than that of the HBc precore sequence and (ii) one to three cysteine residues toward the C-terminus of the molecule from the C-terminal residue of the HBc sequence and within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule [C-terminal cysteine residue(s)].

[0035] The chimer molecule can contain up to about 20 percent substituted amino acid residues in the HBc sequence, and self-assembles into particles that are preferably substantially free of binding to nucleic acids on expression by a host cell such that the particles preferably exhibit a ratio of absorbance at 280 nm to 260 nm in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, as discussed hereinafter, of 0.9 to about 1.7, and more preferably about 1.2 to about 1.7. The particles are typically more stable than are particles formed from otherwise identical HBc chimer molecules that contain both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 after storage at 37° C. in a 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for a time period of one month, and typically are expressed in higher yield than are particles that contain the cysteines at HBc positions 48 and 107.

[0036] In addition, the chimer can optionally contain a peptide-bonded heterologous amino acid residue sequence at one or more of the N-terminus, in the HBc immunodominant loop (i.e., between residue positions about 76 through about 85) or the C-terminus of the chimer. The N-terminal sequence optionally includes a heterologous sequence containing up to about 75 amino acid residues peptide-bonded to one of HBc residues 2-4 that includes an immunogenic epitope. The HBc immunodominant loop sequence can contain (i) zero to all residues in a sequence of HBc positions 76 through 85 present or replaced, and peptide-bonded to one to about 245 amino acid residues that are heterologous to the HBc loop and constitute an immunogen, an anti-antigen or a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten present in a sequence of up to about 40 residues or (ii) the sequence of HBc at positions 76 through 85 present and free from deletions and heterologous residues or (iii) one or more of residues 76 through 85 is absent or replaced. The C-terminal sequence can contain up to about 100 amino acid residues that include an immunogenic epitope in a sequence heterologous to HBc from HBc position 183, or preferably from HBc position 165 to the C-terminus, more preferably a sequence heterologous to HBc from position 156 to the C-terminus, and most preferably from HBc position 149 to the C-terminus.

[0037] More preferably, a contemplated chimer comprises a recombinant HBc protein molecule up to about 380 amino acid residues in length. That chimer contains

[0038] (a) an HBc sequence of at least about 125, and preferably at least about 135, of the N-terminal 163 amino acid residues, or more preferably the N-terminal 156 amino acid residues of the HBc molecule, and most preferably the N-terminal 149 amino acid residues of the HBc molecule that includes the HBc sequence of residue positions 4 through about 75 and about 85 through about 140 in which one or preferably both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 is replaced by another residue such as serine. A chimer optionally includes one or more of the following: (i) a peptide-bonded immunogenic sequence of up to about 75 residues at one or more of the N-terminus, in the HBc immunodominant loop and at the C-terminus of the chimer wherein that C-terminal sequences other than that of HBc from position 163, preferably position 156, through the native HBc C-terminus, (ii) zero to all of the residues of the sequence of positions 76 through 85 present or replaced and peptide-bonded to zero to about 75, and preferably one to about 45, amino acid residues that are heterologous to HBc and constitute an immunogen, an anti-antigen or a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten that is preferably present in a sequence of one to about 40 amino acid residues.

[0039] Additionally, a contemplated chimer molecule contains (b) one to three cysteine residues present (i) at an amino acid position of the chimer molecule corresponding to amino acid position −20 to about +1 from the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 [N-terminal cysteine residue(s)] in a sequence other than that of the HBc precore sequence, or (ii) toward the C-terminus of the molecule from the C-terminal residue of the HBc sequence and within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule [C-terminal cysteine residue(s)), or at both locations (i) and (ii).

[0040] Such a contemplated chimer molecule

[0041] (c) contains up to about 20 percent substituted amino acid residues in the HBc sequence, and

[0042] (d) self-assembles on expression by a host cell into particles that upon collection, purification and dissolution, exhibit a ratio of absorbance at 280 nm to 260 nm of 0.9 to about 1.7, and more preferably about 1.2 to about 1.7, as discussed hereinafter.

[0043] Those self-assembled particles are typically more stable than are particles formed from otherwise identical HBc chimer molecules that contain both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 after storage at 37° C. in a 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for a time period of one month. Thus, the absence of one or, more preferably, both cysteines at residue positions 48 and 107 can enhance the storage stability of a particle that is otherwise stabilized by the presence of an N- or C-terminal cysteine or both. The replacement of one or both of those cysteine residues can also enhance expression of the chimer molecule particles.

[0044] Another embodiment contemplates a recombinant hepatitis B virus core (HBc) protein chimer molecule that has a length of about 135 to about 365 amino acid residues and contains four peptide-linked amino acid residue sequence domains from the N-terminus that are denominated Domains I, II, III and IV.

[0045] Domain I of that chimer molecule comprises about 72 to about 150 amino acid residues whose sequence includes:

[0046] (i) at least the sequence of the residues of position 4 through position 75 of HBc,

[0047] (ii) the substitution (replacement) of another residue such as serine for the cysteine residue at position 48,

[0048] (iii) zero to three cysteine residues at an amino acid position of the chimer molecule corresponding to amino acid position −20 to about +1 from the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 [N-terminal cysteine residue(s)] in a sequence other than that of the HBc precore sequence, and

[0049] (iv) an optional immunogenic epitope sequence containing up to about 75 amino acid residues peptide-bonded to one of HBc residues 2-4.

[0050] Domain II of that chimer molecule comprises up to about 85 amino acid residues peptide-bonded to about HBc residue 75 of Domain I in which (i) zero to all residues in a sequence of HBc positions about 76 through about 85 are present or replaced and peptide-bonded to one to about 75 amino acid residues that are heterologous to the HBc loop and constitute an immunogen, or a sequence of one to about 40 amino acid residues that constitute an anti-antigen or a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten, or

[0051] (ii) the sequence of HBc at positions about 76 to about 85 is present and free from deletions or added heterologous residues.

[0052] Chimer Domain III is an HBc sequence from about position 86 through about position 135 peptide-bonded to about residue 85 of Domain II and in which another residue is substituted for the cysteine of position 107.

[0053] Chimer molecule Domain IV comprises:

[0054] (i) five through thirty residues of an HBc amino acid residue sequence from position about 136 through about 163, and preferably through about position 156, and most preferably through about position 149 peptide-bonded to the residue of position 135 of Domain III,

[0055] (ii) zero to three cysteine residues [C-terminal cysteine residue(s)] within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule, and

[0056] (iii) zero to about 75 amino acid residues in a sequence other than that present in HBc from position 163, preferably position 156, and more preferably position 149 to the C-terminus. A sequence of the chimer molecule from HBc position 150 through the C-terminus of the chimer molecule contains fewer than about ten arginine, lysine residues or mixtures of both residues.

[0057] This preferred chimer molecule (i) has an amino acid residue sequence in which up to about 10 percent of the amino acid residues are substituted in the HBc sequence of the chimer, (ii) has at least one cysteine residue present from the recited zero to three cysteine residues of Domains I and IV and (iii) self-assembles into particles on expression by a host cell. The particles so formed are preferably substantially free of binding to nucleic acids and are preferably more stable after storage at 37° C. in a 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for a time period of one month than are particles formed from otherwise identical HBc chimer molecules that contain both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107.

[0058] Looking generally, usually present HBc cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 are replaced by other residues such as serine in all contemplated chimer molecules and all contemplated chimer molecules contain at least one N- or C-terminal cysteine residue that is not native to the HBc sequence. Thus, in some embodiments, it is preferred that the HBc sequence of Domain I include the residues of position 4 through position 75 alone plus at least an N-terminal cysteine residue. In other embodiments, it is preferred that a contemplated chimer molecule contain not only an N-terminal cysteine residue, but also contain one cysteine residue within Domain IV as noted above that is alone; i.e., added to the HBc sequence or within another amino acid residue sequence. In yet other embodiments, a preferred chimer molecule contains only one or more C-terminal cysteine residues and Domain I is free of cysteine residues not present in a native HBc sequence such as a sequence of FIG. 1, as well as the HBc cysteine residue at position 48. An HBc cysteine residue is present at about position 61 in each of the HBc sequences of FIG. 1.

[0059] A contemplated vaccine or inoculum comprises an immune response-inducing amount of before-mentioned self-assembled chimer molecule particles dissolved or dispersed in a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent composition that typically also contains water. A particularly preferred non-HBc epitope present in a contemplated chimer molecule at one or more of Domains I, II and IV is an immunogenic sequence from the malaria CS protein, a sequence from the amino-terminal 24 residues of the influenza A M2 protein, a sequence from the preS1 or preS2 regions of the hepatitis B surface protein (HBs) or an additional T cell-stimulating sequence from HBc as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,124,726 (and its parent No. 4,882,145) to Thornton et al. such as the sequence of positions about 85 to about 100 or the narrower range of about position 93 to about position 100. A particularly preferred linker residue is a lysine residue.

[0060] The present invention has several benefits and advantages.

[0061] A particular benefit of the invention is that a preferred chimer particle immunogen typically exhibits greater stability upon preparation than do otherwise identical HBc chimer particles that include the cysteine residues replaced at positions 48 and/or 107, while being substantially free of nucleic acids.

[0062] An advantage of the invention is that particles formed from chimers containing residues other than cysteine at positions 48 and 107 form disulfide-containing particles more rapidly than do particles assembled from chimer proteins containing cysteines at positions 48 and 107.

[0063] Another benefit of the invention is that the recombinant immunogen is prepared easily and using well-known cell culture techniques.

[0064] Another advantage of the invention is that the immunogen is easily prepared using well-known recombinant techniques.

[0065] A further benefit of the invention is that the expression of particles is enhanced as compared to similar chimer molecules that include both cysteines at positions 48 and 107.

[0066] A further advantage of the invention is that the expressed particles are more readily characterized such as for quality assurance purposes than are particles that contain cysteines at positions 48 and 107.

[0067] Still further benefits and advantages will be apparent to the worker of ordinary skill from the disclosure that follows.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0068] In the drawings forming a portion of this disclosure

[0069]
FIG. 1, shown in two panels as FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B, provides an alignment of six published sequences for mammalian HBc proteins from six viruses. The first (SEQ ID NO:1), human viral sequence is of the ayw subtype and was published in Galibert et al. (1983) Nature, 281:646-650; the second human viral sequence (SEQ ID NO:2), of the adw subtype, was published by Ono et al. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res., 11(6): 1747-1757; the third human viral sequence (SEQ ID NO:3), is of the adw2 subtype and was published by Valenzuela et al., Animal Virus Genetics, Field et al. eds., Academic Press, New York (1980) pages 57-70; the fourth human viral sequence (SEQ ID NO:4), is of the adyw subtype that was published by Pasek et al. (1979) Nature, 282:575-579; the fifth sequence (SEQ ID NO:5), is that of the woodchuck virus that was published by Galibert et al. (1982) J. Virol., 41:51-65; and the sixth mammalian sequence, (SEQ ID NO:6), is that of the ground squirrel that was published by Seeger et al. (1984) J. Virol., 51:367-375.

[0070]
FIG. 2 shows the modifications made to commercial plasmid vector pKK223-3 in the preparation of plasmid vector pKK223-3N used herein for preparation of recombinant HBc chimers. The modified sequence (SEQ ID NO:7) is shown below the sequence of the commercially available vector (SEQ ID NO:8). The bases of the added NcoI site are shown in lower case letters and the added bases are shown with double underlines, whereas the deleted bases are shown as dashes. The two restriction sites present in this segment of the sequence (NcoI and HindIII) are indicated.

[0071]
FIG. 3, shown in three panels as FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C, schematically illustrates a preferred cloning strategy in which a malarial B cell epitope such as (NANP)4 (SEQ ID NO:9) is cloned into the EcoRI and SacI sites between positions 78 and 79 of an engineered HBc gene in which cysteine residue 48 is replaced by a serine residue [FIG. 3A, HBc 1-78(48S)], which destroys the EcoRI site, while preserving the SacI site. FIG. 3B shows DNA that encodes a T cell epitope such as that referred to as Pf/CS-UTC and a stop codon (SEQ ID NO:10) cloned into the EcoRI and HindIII sites at the C-terminus of an engineered, truncated HBc gene that encodes HBc residues 79-149 with the cysteine at residue position 107 replaced by a serine residue [HBc 79-149(107S)+PF/CS-UTC]. PCR amplification of the construct of FIG. 3B using a primer having a 5′-terminal SacI restriction site adjacent to a HBc-encoding sequence beginning at residue position 79 digestion of the amplified sequence and reaction of the construct of FIG. 3A with SacI, followed by ligation of the appropriate portions is shown in FIG. 3C to form a single gene construct that encodes B cell- and T cell-containing epitopes of an immunogen for a vaccine against P. falciparum.

[0072]
FIG. 4, in eight panels as FIGS. 4A-4H, are analytical size exclusion chromatography elution profiles for four particles designated HBc149; HBc149(C48S/C107S); HBc149+C and HBc149(C48S/C107S)+C at days zero (4A, 4C, 4E and 4G) and 14 after incubation at 37° C. (4B, 4D, 4F, and 4H), respectively. Assembled particles elute at 7 mL, whereas lower order structures elute in subsequent peaks. Samples were run in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 and 0.02% sodium azide, and absorbance at 280 nm is shown on the ordinate in milliabsorption units (mAu) and volume in milliliters (mL) is shown on the abscissa.

[0073]
FIG. 5, taken from U.S. Pat. No. 6,231,864 illustrates a reaction scheme (Scheme 1) that shows two reaction sequences for (I) forming an activated carrier for pendently linking a hapten to a chimeric hepatitis B core protein (sm-HBc) particle using sulpho-succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)-cyclohexane 1-carboxylate (sulpho-SMCC), and then (II) linking a sulfhydryl-terminated (cysteine-terminated) hapten to the activated carrier to form a conjugate particle. The sm-HBc particle is depicted as a box having a single pendent amino group (for purposes of clarity of the figure), whereas the sulfhydryl-terminated hapten is depicted as a line terminated with an SH group.

[0074] Definitions

[0075] Numerals utilized in conjunction with HBc chimers indicate the position in the HBc ayw amino acid residue sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 at which one or more residues has been added to or deleted from the sequence, regardless of whether additions or deletions to the amino acid residue sequence are present. Thus, HBc149 indicates that the chimer ends at residue 149, whereas HBc149+C150 indicates that that same chimer contains a cysteine residue at HBc position 150 relative to the sequence numbers of SEQ ID NO:1.

[0076] The term “antibody” refers to a molecule that is a member of a family of glycosylated proteins called immunoglobulins, which can specifically bind to an antigen.

[0077] The word “antigen” has been used historically to designate an entity that is bound by an antibody or receptor, and also to designate the entity that induces the production of the antibody. More current usage limits the meaning of antigen to that entity bound by an antibody or receptor, whereas the word “immunogen” is used for the entity that induces antibody production or binds to the receptor. Where an entity discussed herein is both immunogenic and antigenic, reference to it as either an immunogen or antigen is typically made according to its intended utility.

[0078] “Antigenic determinant” refers to the actual structural portion of the antigen that is immunologically bound by an antibody combining site or T-cell receptor. The term is also used interchangeably with “epitope”. An antigenic determinant is thus a structure that stimulates antibody production or T cell activation, and the presence of such a structure can be ascertained by determining which structure is bound by antibodies or induces T cell activation.

[0079] The word “conjugate” as used herein refers to a hapten operatively linked to a carrier protein, as through an amino acid residue side chain.

[0080] The term “conservative substitution” as used herein denotes that one amino acid residue has been replaced by another, biologically similar residue. Examples of conservative substitutions include the substitution of one hydrophobic residue such as isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine for another, or the substitution of one polar residue for another such as between arginine and lysine, between glutamic and aspartic acids or between glutamine and asparagine and the like. Also included as contemplated “conservative substitutions” are those in which a residue from one mammalian HBc sequence such as those in FIG. 1 is used to replace a residue in the same position in another mammalian HBc sequence.

[0081] The term “corresponds” in its various grammatical forms as used in relation to peptide sequences means the peptide sequence described plus or minus up to about three amino acid residues at either or both of the amino- and carboxy-termini and containing only conservative substitutions in particular amino acid residues along the polypeptide sequence.

[0082] The term “Domain” is used herein to mean a portion of a recombinant HBc chimer molecule that is identified by (i) residue position numbering relative to the position numbers of HBcAg subtype ayw as reported by Galibert et al., (1979) Nature, 281:646-650 (SEQ ID NO: 1). The polypeptide portions of at least chimer Domains I, II and III are believed to exist in a similar tertiary form to the corresponding sequences of naturally occurring HBcAg.

[0083] As used herein, the term “fusion protein” designates a polypeptide that contains at least two amino acid residue sequences not normally found linked together in nature that are operatively linked together end-to-end (head-to-tail) by a peptide bond between their respective carboxy- and amino-terminal amino acid residues. The fusion proteins of the present invention are HBc chimer molecules that induce the production of antibodies that immunoreact with a polypeptide that corresponds in amino acid residue sequence to the polypeptide portion of the fusion protein.

[0084] The phrase “hepatitis B” as used here refers in its broadest context to any member of the family of mammalian hepadnaviridae, as discussed before.

[0085] The words “polypeptide” and “peptide” are used interchangeably throughout the specification and designate a linear series of amino acid residues connected one to the other by peptide bonds between the alpha-amino and carboxy groups of adjacent amino acids. Polypeptides can be a variety of lengths, either in their neutral (uncharged) forms or in forms that are salts. It is well understood in the art that amino acid residue sequences contain acidic and basic groups, and that the particular ionization state exhibited by the peptide is dependent on the pH value of the surrounding medium when the peptide is in solution, or that of the medium from which it was obtained if the peptide is in solid form. Thus, “polypeptide” or its equivalent terms is intended to include the appropriate amino acid residue sequence referenced. A peptide or polypeptide is always shown herein from left to right and in the direction from amino-terminus (N-terminus) to carboxy-terminus (C-terminus).

[0086] The term “residue” is used interchangeably with the phrase amino acid residue. All amino acid residues identified herein are in the natural or L-configuration. In keeping with standard polypeptide nomenclature, [J. Biol. Chem., 243:3557-59 (1969)], abbreviations for amino acid residues are as shown in the following Table of Correspondence.

1TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE1-Letter3-LetterAMINO ACIDYTyrL-tyrosineGGlyglycineFPheL-phenylalanineMMetL-methionineAAlaL-alanineSSerL-serineIIleL-isoleucineLLeuL-leucineTThrL-threonineVValL-valinePProL-prolineKLysL-lysineHHisL-histidineQGlnL-glutamineEGluL-glutamic acidZGlxL-glutamic acidorL-glutamineWTrpL-tryptophanRArgL-arginineDAspL-aspartic acidNAsnL-asparagineBAsxL-aspartic acidorL-asparagineCCysL-cysteine

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0087] The present invention contemplates an immunogenic HBc protein, stabilized immunogenic particles comprised of that protein, and a vaccine or inoculum comprised of the stabilized particles. A contemplated chimer molecule is preferably truncated at least at the C-terminus relative to a native core molecule whose C-terminus is normally at residue position 183 for the native ayw subtype of FIG. 1. Particles containing a contemplated chimer molecule are stabilized by replacement of one or both of the cysteine residues that are present in the native HBc protein (FIG. 1) at residue positions 48 and 107 and by the presence of an added cysteine residue that is located at or near one or both of the C- and N-termini. Such particles are preferably substantially free of binding to nucleic acids as is discussed hereinafter.

[0088] More particularly, a contemplated chimer molecule has a length of up to about 600 peptide-bonded α-amino acid residues, more preferably up to about 380 residues, and most preferably up to about 200 residues. Such a contemplated chimer molecule contains at least about 125, and more preferably at least about 135, of the N-terminal 183 amino acid residues, preferably 163 amino acid residues of HBc, and more preferably of the N-terminal 156 amino acid residues, and most preferably of the N-terminal 149 amino acid residues. The HBc sequence present includes the HBc sequence of residue positions 4 through about 75 and about 85 through about 140 in which one or preferably both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 is (are) replaced by another residue.

[0089] A contemplated chimer molecule also contains one or both of (a) one to three cysteine residues at an amino acid position of the chimer molecule corresponding to amino acid position −20 to about +1 from the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 [N-terminal cysteine residue(s)] in a sequence other than that of the HBc precore sequence and (b) one to about three cysteine residues toward the C-terminus of the molecule from the C-terminal residue of the HBc sequence and within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule [C-terminal cysteine residue(s)]. The chimer molecule (i) contains up to about 20 percent substituted amino acid residues in the HBc sequence, and (ii) self-assembles into particles that are preferably substantially free of binding to nucleic acids on expression by a host cell.

[0090] The formed particles exhibit a ratio of absorbance at 280 nm to 260 nm in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, as discussed hereinafter, of 0.9 to about 1.7, and evidence the substantial freedom from nucleic acid binding by exhibiting a ratio of absorbance at 280 nm to 260 nm in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 and more preferably of about 1.2 to about 1.7. The formed particles are typically and preferably more stable [after isolation] than are particles formed from otherwise identical HBc chimer molecules that contain both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 after storage at 37° C. in a 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for a time period of one month. In addition, the chimer optionally contains a peptide-bonded heterologous amino acid residue sequence at one or more of the N-terminus, in the HBc immunodominant loop (i.e., between residue positions about 76 through about 85; HBc loop or simply loop) or at the C-terminus of the chimer. A heterologous sequence present at the N-terminus of the molecule can have a length of up to about 75 amino acid residues, whereas a heterologous sequence present at the C-terminus of the molecule can have a length of up to about 100 amino acid residues. When present at either of the N-terminus or C-terminus of the molecule, the heterologous sequence usually contains a B cell or T cell immunogenic epitope, or both, and preferably contains up to about 75 amino acid residues. The heterologous sequence present in the HBc loop can contain a sequence of up to about 245 amino acid residues as discussed below.

[0091] The HBc immunodominant loop sequence can contain (i) zero to all residues in a sequence of HBc positions about 76 through about 85 present or replaced, and peptide-bonded to one to about 245 amino acid residues that are heterologous to the HBc loop and constitute an epitope-containing immunogen, an anti-antigen or a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten present in a sequence of up to about 40 residues, or (ii) the sequence of HBc at positions about 76 to about 85 is present and free from deletions and heterologous residues, or

[0092] (iii) one or more of residues 76 through 85 is absent or replaced.

[0093] A heterologous amino acid residue sequence of up to about 40 residues that includes a linker residue for a conjugated hapten can thus be present in the HBc loop, as can an anti-antigenic residue or sequence. The anti-antigenic residue or sequence, or residue or sequence containing a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten each preferably contain one to about 40 amino acid residues, more preferably contain one to about five residues, and most preferably contain a single residue. The heterologous epitope-containing immunogen sequence present in the HBc loop preferably contains up to about 75 residues and more preferably up to about 50 residues, and most preferably up to about 25 residues, but can include up to about 245 residues, as noted above.

[0094] The term “anti-antigen” as used herein is intended to mean a residue or sequence that disrupts the antigenicity of a particular sequence; i.e., ability of that sequence to be bound by an antibody. Thus, an anti-antigen can be present in the immunogenic loop, and when present, that residue or sequence disrupts the binding of antibodies to the loop. Those antibodies can be monoclonal or polyclonal, but monoclonal antibodies such as that designated 3105 that is available commercially from the Institute of Immunology Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. That monoclonal antibody is understood to bind to the amino acid residues at the tip of the HBc immunogenic loop. A chemically reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten can function as an anti-antigen in disrupting antibody binding to the loop. However, for convenience, an anti-antigenic residue or sequence will be deemed herein to be a residue or sequence that lacks a chemically reactive residue such as a lysine or cysteine and functions as an anti-antigen.

[0095] In another embodiment, the leucine and arginine residues of HBc positions 76 and 82 are both replaced by cysteine-residues and zero to all of the remaining residues in the sequence of HBc positions about 76 through about 85 are present, peptide-bonded to an optionally present sequence of one to about 245 amino acid residues that constitute a heterologous immunogen, an anti-antigenic sequence or a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten present in a sequence of up to about 40 amino acid residues.

[0096] The contemplated immunogenic particles are comprised of recombinant hepatitis B core (HBc) chimeric protein molecules, with the chimeric protein molecules being up to about 600 amino acid residues in length. Those chimeric protein molecules (a) contain an HBc sequence of at least about 125 and more preferably at least about 135 residues of the N-terminal 183 amino acid residues, preferably 163 amino acid residues of the HBc molecule, and more preferably the N-terminal 156 residues, and most preferably the N-terminal 149 residues that contains the HBc sequence of residue positions 4 through about 75 and about 85 through about 140 in which one and preferably both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 are replaced by another residue such as serine. In addition to serine, other contemplated replacements for the cysteines at HBc positions 48 and 107 include any residue other than cysteine, including particularly glutamine, asparagine, serine, alanine, threonine and lysine.

[0097] The HBc chimer molecule sequence optionally includes (a′) a peptide-bonded heterologous amino acid sequence containing an immunogenic sequence at one or more of the N-terminus, in the HBc immunodominant loop and the C-terminus of the chimer, or (b′) a heterologous insert in the HBc immunodominant loop having a length of one to about 40 amino acid residues and containing a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten, or (c′) zero to all of the residues of the sequence of HBc positions 76 through 85, as discussed before.

[0098] The chimeric protein molecule also contains one or both of (a′) one to three cysteine residues at an amino acid position of the chimer molecule corresponding to amino acid position −20 to about +1 from the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 [N-terminal cysteine residue(s)] in a sequence other than that of the HBc precore sequence and (b′) one to about three cysteine residues toward the C-terminus of the molecule from the C-terminal residue of the HBc sequence and within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule [C-terminal cysteine residue(s)].

[0099] A chimeric protein molecule contains up to about 20 percent substituted amino acid residues in the HBc sequence, and self-assembles into particles that are preferably substantially free of binding to nucleic acids (exhibit a ratio of absorbance at 280 nm to 260 nm of about 0.9 to about 1.7, and more preferably about 1.2 to about 1.7, as discussed hereinafter) on expression by a host cell. The particles are typically and preferably more stable after storage at 37° C. in a 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for a time period of one month than are particles formed from otherwise identical HBc chimer molecules that contain both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107. This enhanced stability can measured by comparison of areas under peaks observed in analytical size exclusion chromatography or by comparison of non-reducing SDS gel band sizes or protein densities.

[0100] Thus, a chimeric protein can display one or more immunogenic epitopes at the N-terminus, in the HBc immunogenic (immunodominant) loop or C-terminus, or a linker for such a B cell or T cell epitope in the immunogenic loop, or has zero to all of the residues of positions about 76 through about 85. In one embodiment, the chimeric protein contains one or more N-terminal cysteine residue(s) that can confer further enhanced stability on formation to the self-assembled particles. In another embodiment, the chimeric protein contains one or more C-terminal cysteine residue(s) that also can confer further enhanced stability on formation to the self-assembled particles. A contemplated chimeric protein molecule can also contain a cysteine residue at or near both of the N- and C-termini, that is, a chimeric protein molecule can contain both an N-terminal cysteine residue and a C-terminal cysteine residue, as defined previously.

[0101] A contemplated chimeric protein can contain the residues from position 150 through 183 of HBc, but is preferably sufficiently free of arginine and or lysine residues downstream of (toward the carboxy-terminus from) HBc residue position 149 so that the self-assembled particles are substantially free of nucleic acid binding. In some embodiments, the HBc sequence from position 149 through about position 163 that includes two of the arginine-rich repeat sequences is present (See, FIG. 1). In other embodiments, the HBc sequence through about position 156 that contains one arginine-rich sequence is present. In still other embodiments, the C-terminal HBc sequence ends between HBc positions 140 and 149 and the chimer molecule is free of the arginine repeats present in a native HBc sequence of FIG. 1 from position 150 through the C-terminus or a similar sequence containing lysine residues in place of one or more of the arginine residues. Substantial freedom from nucleic acid binding is discussed hereinafter and is readily determined.

[0102] For ease of discussion, contemplated chimer sequences and sequence position numbers referred to herein are based on the sequence and position numbering of the human hepatitis B core protein of subtype ayw [Galibert et al., (1979) Nature, 281:646-650] that is shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. It is to be understood, however, that in view of the great similarity between the mammalian hepadnavirus capsid protein sequences and similar particle formation exhibited by those proteins, which are well-known to skilled workers, a discussion regarding human HBc subtype ayw is also applicable to subtype adw, as well as the woodchuck and ground squirrel proteins. As a consequence of those great similarities, HBc sequences are recited generally herein as a “HBc” sequence, unless otherwise stated.

[0103] In another embodiment, a contemplated HBc chimer is up to about 380 residues in length and contains (a) an HBc sequence of at least about 125 and more preferably at least about 135 of the N-terminal 163 amino acid residues, more preferably of the N-terminal 156 amino acid residues, and most preferably of the N-terminal 149 amino acid residues of the HBc molecule that includes the HBc sequence of residue positions 4 through about 75 and about 85 through about 140 in which one and preferably both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 are replaced by another residue such as serine, as discussed before.

[0104] The chimeric protein molecule also contains one or both of (a′) one to three cysteine residues at an amino acid position of the chimer molecule corresponding to amino acid position −20 to about +1 from the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 [N-terminal cysteine residue(s)] in a sequence other than that of the HBc precore sequence and (b′) one to about three cysteine residues toward the C-terminus of the molecule from the C-terminal residue of the HBc sequence and within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule [C-terminal cysteine residue(s)].

[0105] That chimer molecule contains up to about 20 percent substituted amino acid residues in the HBc sequence, and self-assembles into particles that are substantially free of binding to nucleic acids on expression by a host cell. The particles are preferably more stable after storage at 37° C. in a 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for a time period of one month than are particles formed from otherwise identical HBc chimer molecules that contain both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107. A contemplated chimer molecule also preferably exhibits an enhanced amount of expression A chimeric protein of this embodiment optionally contains a peptide-bonded heterologous amino acid residue sequence at one or more of the N-terminus, in the HBc immunodominant loop (i.e., between residue positions about 76 through about 85) or the C-terminus of the chimer as discussed before. The HBc immunogenic loop sequence can contain (i) zero to all residues in a sequence of HBc positions about 76 through about 85 present or replaced, and peptide-bonded to one to about 245, and preferably up to about 75, amino acid residues that are heterologous to the HBc loop and constitute an immunogen, a sequence of up to about 40 residues that constitutes an anti-antigen or a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten present or (ii) the sequence of HBc at positions about 76 through about 85 present and free from deletions and heterologous residues or (iii) one or more of residues about 76 through about 85 is absent or replaced.

[0106] As noted before, a contemplated chimer molecule contains at least one cysteine residue that is located at either or both of (i) a position of about −20 to about +1 relative to the N-terminus of HBc as is illustrated in FIG. 1 and SEQ ID NO: 1 or (ii) toward the C-terminus of the molecule from the C-terminal residue of the HBc sequence and within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule. The concept of a negative amino acid position is usually associated with a leader sequence such as the precore sequence of HBc. That concept is used similarly here in that one can simply align a given chimer molecule sequence with that of SEQ ID NO: 1 to determine the position of the chimer that corresponds to that of the starting methionine residue of position +1 of HBc. Inasmuch as amino acid residue sequences are normally shown from left to right and in the direction from N-terminus to C-terminus, any aligned chimer molecule residue to the left of the position that can be occupied by the HBc start methionine has a negative position. A contemplated cysteine residue can occur at a position about twenty residues to the left of the aligned start methionine of HBc to the position corresponding to that start methionine.

[0107] In another aspect, a preferred HBc chimer has a sequence of about 135 to about 360 L-α-amino acid residues and contains four serially peptide-linked domains; i.e., Domains I, II, III and IV. Those four domains are linked together in the same manner as the previously described chimers and as are native proteins; i.e., they are peptide-bonded to each other, as compared to polypeptides that contain residues of other than α-amino acids and therefore cannot form peptide bonds, those that contain D-amino acid residues, or oligopeptide conjugates in which two or more polypeptides are operatively linked through an amino acid residue side chain. A contemplated chimeric HBc protein can therefore be prepared by expression using the usual methods of recombinant technology.

[0108] Domain I of that chimer molecule comprises about 72 to about 160 amino acid residues whose sequence includes (i) at least the sequence of the residues of position 4 through position about 75 of HBc, (ii) zero to three cysteine residues at an amino acid position of the chimer molecule corresponding to amino acid position −20 to about +1, and preferably amino acid position −14 to about +1, from the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 [N-terminal cysteine residue(s)) in a sequence other than that of the HBc precore sequence, and (iii) an optional sequence containing up to about 75 amino acid residues peptide-bonded to one of HBc residues 2-4 that comprise an immunogenic epitope (an immunogen). That immunogenic sequence, when present, is typically an epitope used to induce a B cell immune response.

[0109] Domain II of that chimer molecule comprises up to about 60 amino acid residues peptide-bonded to HBc residue about 75 of Domain I in which:

[0110] (i) zero to all residues in a sequence of HBc positions about 76 through about 85 are present or replaced and peptide-bonded to one to about 50 amino acid residues that are heterologous to HBc and constitute an immunogen, or a sequence of one to about 40 amino acid residues that constitute an anti-antigen or include a chemically-reactive linker residue for a conjugated hapten, or (ii) the sequence of HBc at about position 76 through about position 85 is present and free from heterologous residues.

[0111] In the situation where zero residues in a sequence of HBc positions about 76 through about 85 are present in this or another chimer, and peptide-bonded to one to about 50 amino acid residues that are heterologous to HBc, those residues are absent and the HBc residue at about position 75 is bonded directly to the N-terminal residue of the heterologous sequence, whose C-terminal residue is peptide bonded to the residue at about HBc position 86. The situation in which all of the residues at about HBc positions 76-85 are absent is not preferred, and it is preferred that at least four residues from that sequence be present, and most preferred that all ten of the residues or their replacements be present.

[0112] In one preferred embodiment, the sequence of 10 residues of positions 76 through 85 (position 76-85 sequence) is present, but interrupted by one to about 50 residues of the immunogen-, or 1 to about 40 residues of an anti-antigen- or linker-containing sequence. In another embodiment, the 10-mer sequence of HBc positions 76-85 is present with two replacement cysteine residues at HBc positions 76 and 82, and includes an interrupting sequence of up to 50 residues that can be as above.

[0113] Domain III is an HBc sequence from position about 86 through about position 135 peptide-bonded to residue 85 of Domain II.

[0114] Chimer molecule Domain IV comprises:

[0115] (i) five through fourteen residues of an HBc amino acid residue sequence from position 136 through about 149 peptide-bonded to the residue of position 135 of Domain III;

[0116] (ii) zero to three cysteine residues [C-terminal cysteine residue(s)] within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule; and

[0117] (iii) zero to about 75 amino acid residues in an immunogenic sequence not present in HBc from about HBc position 150 to the C-terminus.

[0118] The sequence of about HBc positions 136 through about 163 can be present in Domain IV, but it is preferred that the HBc portion of a chimer stop at sequence position 156. Preferably, Domain IV contains a sequence of zero to about 50 amino acid residues in a sequence absent from those positions of HBc, and more preferably that sequence is zero to about 25 residues. Thus, use of a further sequence from HBc that is not present in the region of about position 163 through 183 is contemplated for Domain IV. One such sequence is the T cell epitope of HBc positions 85 through 100 or 93 through 100. Domain IV also preferably contains one cysteine residue at or near the C-terminus of the molecule.

[0119] The chimer molecules (i) have an amino acid residue sequence in which up to about 10 percent of the amino acid residues are substituted in the HBc sequence of the chimer and (ii) self-assemble into particles on expression by a host cell. The particles are substantially free of binding to nucleic acids and are preferably more stable after storage at 37° C. in a 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for a time period of one month than are particles formed from otherwise identical HBc chimer molecules that contain both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107.

[0120] In one aspect, a contemplated chimer molecule contains a sequence comprising an epitope at the N-terminus peptide-bonded to one of HBc residues 2-4. In another aspect, a contemplated chimer molecule contains an immunogen-, anti-antigen or a linker residue-containing sequence peptide-bonded near the middle of the molecule located between HBc residues 76 and 85 in the immunodominant loop. In a further aspect, an immunogen-containing sequence is located at the C-terminal portion of the chimer molecule peptide-bonded to one of HBc residues 136-149 or one of residues 140-156, or one of residues 140-163.

[0121] In yet other aspects, two or three immunogen-containing sequences are present at the above locations, or one or two immunogen-containing sequences are present along with a linker residue for an epitope. The multiple immunogens can be the same at two or three positions, or dimers or trimers of a particular immunogen can be present in one or more positions. Each of those chimer molecules also contains one or both of an N-terminal or C-terminal cysteine residue(s), as discussed before. Specific examples of several of these immunogens, the chimer molecules and their self-assembled particles are discussed hereinafter.

[0122] One preferred HBc chimer molecule can contain about 130 to about 355 amino acid residues, contains a substitute residue for either or both of cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107, and at least one added N- or C-terminal stabilizing cysteine residue that is not present in a naturally occurring HBc molecule. In some preferred embodiments, HBC residue 4 is present, whereas residues 2-4 are present in other preferred embodiments, so that Domain I can begin at HBc residue 4, 3 or 2 and continue through residue 75; i.e., the HBc residue at HBc position 75. Residue 1 is methionine, the amino acid of the DNA start codon. Where the chimer contains an N-terminal immunogenic sequence or cysteine residue(s), it is preferred that the native methionine that is normally present at position 1 of HBc be absent so that only one start signal is present in the encoding DNA or RNA.

[0123] Domain I can also contain zero to three cysteine residues at an amino acid position of the chimer molecule corresponding to amino acid position −20 to about +1, and preferably amino acid position −14 to about +1, from the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 [N-terminal cysteine residue(s)] in a sequence other than that of the HBc precore sequence.

[0124] The heterologous immunogenic immunogen that can be present in Domain I or in the immunodominant loop of Domain II preferably contains about 15 to about 50 residues, although an epitope as short as about 6 amino acid residues can induce and be recognized by antibodies and is therefore useful, and an about 75-mer sequence can be present at the N-terminus in Domain I.

[0125] It is preferred that all of the HBc residues of Domain II from position 76 through position 85 are present, although interrupted by one or more other residues. Domain II preferably contains at least four residues, that can have any sequence that does not interfere with expression or use, but those residues are preferably part of the sequence between the residues of positions 75 and 85. In one embodiment, the residues of loop positions 76 and 82 are mutated and replaced by cysteine residues so that further stabilization of the loop can be achieved.

[0126] Domain III contains HBc residues 86 through 135 peptide-bonded to residue 85.

[0127] Domain IV contains a sequence of at least five residues that are comprised of (i) a sequence of the residues of HBc positions 136 through 140, or up to residue 163, preferably through position 156, and more preferably through position 149, peptide-bonded to residue 135, (ii) zero to three cysteines residues and (iii) optionally can contain a sequence of an immunogenic epitope of up to about 75 residues, particularly when the HBc sequence ends at residue 140, although a shorter sequence of up to about 25 residues is more preferred.

[0128] That Domain IV immunogenic sequence is preferably heterologous to the sequence of HBc from about position 163 to the HBc C-terminus. The immunogenic sequence, when present in Domain IV, is preferably a T cell epitope, but can also be a B cell epitope as are usually present in one or the other of Domains I and II. Illustrative B cell and T cell epitopes from the HBc sequence, from the preS1 and preS2 regions of HBs and other sources are provided in Tables A and B, hereinafter.

[0129] Domain IV can also contain zero to three cysteine residues and those Cys residues are present within about 30 residues of the carboxy-terminus (C-terminus) of the chimer molecule. Preferably, one cysteine (Cys) residue is present, and that Cys is preferably present as the carboxy-terminal (C-terminal) residue, unless a T cell epitope is present as part of Domain IV. When such a T cell epitope is present, the preferred Cys is preferably within the C-terminal last five residues of the HBc chimer.

[0130] In one embodiment, a particularly preferred chimer contains two immunogenic epitope sequences. Those two immunogenic epitope sequences are present in Domains I and II, or II and IV, or I and IV. One of the two immunogenic epitope sequences is preferably a B cell epitope in some embodiments. In other embodiments, one of the two immunogenic epitope sequences is a T cell epitope. More preferably the two immunogenic epitopes are different B cell and T cell epitopes. In addition, a plurality of B cell epitopes can be present at a B cell epitope location, as can a plurality of T cell epitopes be present at a T cell epitope location.

[0131] In the embodiments in which the chimer molecule contains an immunogenic epitope sequence in Domain II, it is preferred that that the sequence contain one or more B cell epitopes, that the HBc sequence between amino acid residues 76 and 85 be present, but interrupted by the immunogenic epitope(s), and that the chimer further include one or more T cell epitopes in Domain IV peptide-bonded to one of HBc residues 140-156.

[0132] This same preference holds for those chimer molecules in which the heterologous linker residue for a conjugated epitope is present in Domain II, thereby providing one or more immunogenic epitopes in Domain II, with residues 76 and 85 present, but interrupted by the heterologous linker residue, with a T cell epitope being present peptide-bonded to one of HBC residues 140-156. The particles formed from such chimer molecules typically contain a ratio of conjugated epitope to C-terminal peptide-bonded T cell epitope of about 1:4 to 1:1, with a ratio of about 1:2 being common.

[0133] In an illustrative structure of an above-described chimer molecule, a heterologous linker residue for a conjugated epitope is present in Domain II and a T cell epitope is present in Domain IV, with no additional B cell epitope being present in Domain II. Such a chimer exhibits immunogenicity of the T cell epitope, while exhibiting minimal, HBc antigenicity as measured by binding of anti-loop monoclonal antibodies in an ELISA assay as discussed hereinafter.

[0134] A preferred contemplated HBc chimer molecule contains a sequence of about 135 to about 360 residues. A preferred HBc chimer molecule that can contain one or two immunogenic epitopes of preferred lengths of about 15 to about 75 residues each and a preferred HBc portion length of about 140 to about 156 residues has a sequence length of about 170 to about 280 amino acid residues. Particularly preferred chimer molecules that contain one or two immunogenic epitopes have a length of about 190 to about 225 residues. A particularly preferred chimer molecule that is free of added immunogenic epitopes can have a length of about 140 to about 156 residues. It is to be understood that a wide range of chimer molecule lengths is contemplated in view of the variations in length of the N- and C-terminal HBc portions and differing lengths of the several contemplated epitopes that can be inserted in the immunogenic loop.

[0135] A contemplated recombinant protein, after expression by a host cell, self-assembles to form particles that are substantially free of binding to nucleic acids. The contemplated HBc chimer particles are generally spherical in shape and are usually homogeneous in size for a given preparation. These chimeric particles thus resemble native HBc particles that have a similar shape and size and can be recovered from infected persons.

[0136] A contemplated chimer particle comprises previously discussed chimer molecules. More broadly, such a chimer particle comprises a chimeric C-terminal truncated HBc protein that has a sequence of at least about 125, and preferably at least about 135 of the N-terminal 163 residues and contains (i) an immunogenic epitope peptide-bonded to one or more of the N-terminus, C-terminus or the immunodominant loop, or a heterologous linker residue for an epitope in the immunodominant loop, and (ii) one to three cysteine residues at one or both of the N-terminus and C-terminus as previously described, and at least a 5 HBc residue sequence from position 135.

[0137] A contemplated particle is preferably sufficiently free of arginine and/or lysine residues in Domain IV so that the self-assembled particles are substantially free of nucleic acid binding and exhibits a 280/260 absorbance ratio of about 0.9 to about 1.7 and more preferably about 1.2 to about 1.7, as discussed hereinafter. Thus, a preferred chimeric protein is free of the HBc sequence between positions 163 and 183, and a more preferred chimer protein is free of the HBc sequence between positions 156 and 183. A particularly preferred HBc chimer molecule contains fewer than nine arginine and lysine residues and mixtures thereof from HBc position 149 through the C-terminus of the chimer molecule.

[0138] The substantial freedom of nucleic acid binding exhibited by contemplated particles can be readily determined by a comparison of the absorbance of the particles in aqueous solution measured at both 280 and 260 nm; i.e., a 280/260 absorbance ratio. The contemplated particles do not bind substantially to nucleic acids that are oligomeric and/or polymeric DNA and RNA species originally present in the cells of the organism used to express the protein. Such nucleic acids exhibit an absorbance at 260 nm and relatively less absorbance at 280 nm, whereas a protein such as a contemplated chimer absorbs relatively less at 260 nm and has a greater absorbance at 280 nm.

[0139] Thus, recombinantly expressed full length HBc particles or chimeric HBc particles that contain the arginine and lysine-rich sequence at residue positions 150-183 (or 150-185) sometimes referred to in the art as the protamine region exhibit a ratio of absorbance at 280 nm to absorbance at 260 nm (280/260 absorbance ratio) of about 0.8. Particles that include the HBc sequence through position 163 exhibit a 280/260 ratio of about 0.9 to about 1.0, and stain positively for nucleic acid with ethidium bromide.

[0140] On the other hand, particles sufficiently free of arginine and lysine residues in Domain IV so that the self-assembled particles are substantially free of nucleic acid binding such as particles that are free of the arginine-rich nucleic acid binding region of naturally occurring HBc like as those that contain fewer than three arginine or lysine residues or mixtures thereof adjacent to each other, or those having a native or chimeric sequence that ends at about HBc residue position 140 to position 149, exhibit a 280/260 absorbance ratio of about 1.2 to about 1.7. A more typical 280/260 absorbance ratio is about 1.4 to about 1.7. This range is due in large part to the number of aromatic amino acid residues present in Domains II and IV of a given chimeric HBc particle.

[0141] The presence of the above-discussed N-terminal and/or C-terminal cysteine residue(s) provides an enhancement of the ability of the chimer molecules to form stable immunogenic particles (discussed hereinafter). In addition, the replacement of the native cysteines at one or both of positions 48 and 107 enhances the stability of the formed particles in addition to that provided by the N- and/or C-terminal cysteine residue(s). Thus, a contemplated HBc chimer particle immunogen tends to form particles that stay together upon collection and initial purification as measured by analytical size exclusion chromatography and upon analysis by non-reducing SDS-PAGE, whose details are discussed hereinafter.

[0142] Contemplated particles are typically and preferably more stable after storage at 37° C. in a 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 for a time period of one month than are particles formed from otherwise identical HBc chimer molecules that contain both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107. Examples of enhanced stabilities are discussed in greater detail in the Examples that follow.

[0143] Domain I of a preferred contemplated chimeric HBc protein constitutes an amino acid residue sequence of HBc beginning with at least amino acid residue position 4 through position 75, and Domain III constitutes a HBc sequence from position 86 through position 135. Those Domains include at least one replacement of another residue for a cysteine residue present in a native sequence shown in FIG. 1 at one or both of positions 48 and 107. The sequences from any of the mammalian hepadnaviruses can be used for either of Domains I and III, and sequences from two or more viruses can be used in one chimer, but the noted replacement of one or both cysteine residues at positions 48 and 107 relates to any sequence used. Preferably, and for ease of construction, the human ayw sequence is used through out the chimer.

[0144] HBc chimers having a Domain I that contains more than a deletion of the first three amino-terminal (N-terminal) residues have been reported to result in the complete disappearance of HBc chimer protein in E. coli cells. Pumpens et al., (1995) Intervirology, 38:63-74. On the other hand, a recent study in which an immunogenic 23-mer polypeptide from the influenza M2 protein was fused to the HBc N-terminal sequence reported that the resultant fusion protein formed particles when residues 1-3 of the native HBc sequence were replaced. Neirynck et al. (October 1999) Nature Med., 5(10):1157-1163. Thus, the art teaches that particles can form when an added amino acid sequence is present peptide-bonded to one of residues 2-4 of HBc, whereas particles do not form if no additional sequence is present and more than residues 1-3 are deleted from the N-terminus of HBc.

[0145] An N-terminal epitope sequence peptide-bonded to one of the first five N-terminal residues of HBc can contain a single cysteine residue or a sequence of up to about 30 residues that comprise an immunogenic sequence. The one to three cysteine residues can be present at a convenient location in the sequence, but are typically near the C-terminus of the added sequence so that the added N-terminal cysteine residue(s) are at a position of about −20 to about +1, and more preferably at a position of about −14 to about +1, relative to the HBc N-terminus as shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. Exemplary sequences include a B cell or T cell epitope such as those discussed and illustrated hereinafter (Tables A and B, respectively), the 23-mer polypeptide from the influenza M2 protein of Neirynck et al., above, that includes two cysteine residues, and variants of that sequence containing at least about 6 residues, a sequence of another (heterologous) protein such as galactosidase as can occur in fusion proteins as a result of the expression system used, or another hepatitis B-related sequence such as that from the PreS1 or PreS2 regions or the major HBsAg immunogenic sequence.

[0146] Domain II, the loop region, contains a sequence of zero to about 255 amino acid residues. Of those residues, zero (none), and preferably at least 4 residues, more preferably at least 8, and most preferably ten constitute portions of the HBc sequence at about position 76 through about position 85, and one to about 245 residues, and preferably one to about 50 residues are heterologous (foreign) to HBc, or at least not present at about positions 76-85 of HBc, and correspond to an immunogenic sequence such as a B or T cell epitope, an anti-antigenic sequence or sequence containing a chemically reactive residue for linking to a hapten.

[0147] More particularly, the heterologous sequence present in the immunodominant loop can constitute (i) a sequence of up to about 40 residues that contains heterologous linker residue for a epitope such as a B cell or T cell epitope or an anti-antigenic residue or sequence, or (ii) an immunogenic B or T cell epitope that preferably contains 6 to about 50, more preferably about 15 to about 50, and most preferably about 20 to about 30 amino acid residues. Those one or more residues are positioned so that they are peptide-bonded between zero, or preferably at least 4 and more preferably at least 8 residues, or all of the residues of about positions 76 through 85 of the HBc sequence. Immunogenic B cell epitope sequences are preferably peptide-bonded into the HBc sequence or linked at this position by the linker residue, and use of a B cell epitope is discussed illustratively hereinafter.

[0148] Those preferred at least 4 HBc residues that are preferably present in the loop (Domain II) can be all in one sequence such as residues 82-85, or can be split on either side of (flank) the heterologous linker residue(s) as where residues 76-77 and 84-85 are present or where residues 76 and 83-85 are present. More preferably, Domain II contains at least 8 residues of the HBc sequence from residue 76 through 85. Most preferably, the sequence of all 10 residues of positions 76 through 85 is present in the chimer.

[0149] The one to about 245 residues added to the HBC loop sequence can be heterologous to a HBc sequence or can correspond to one or more immunogenic portions of the HBc sequence that are other than those of HBc at about positions 76-85. Such a sequence is therefore heterologous to the position of insertion in HBc. A single added heterologous residue can be a heterologous linker residue for a B cell epitope or an anti-antigen as discussed before. The longer sequences, typically at least 6 amino acid residues long to about 50 amino acid residues long and more preferably about 15 to about 50 residues in length, as noted before, are in a sequence that comprises an immunogen such as a B cell or T cell epitope, except for heterologous residues encoded by restriction sites.

[0150] Exemplary peptide B cell epitopes useful for both linkage to the linker residue after expression of a contemplated chimer and for expression within a HBc chimer at one or more of the N-terminus, within the immunogenic loop or at the C-terminus of the chimer are illustrated in Table A, below, along with the common name given to the gene from which the sequence is obtained, the literature or patent citation for published epitopes, and SEQ ID NO.

2TABLE AB Cell EpitopesSEQ IDOrganismGeneSequenceCitation*NOStreptococcusPspA1KLEELSDKIDELDAE111pneumoniaePsP2QKKYDEDQKKTEE-112KAALEKAASEEM-DKAVAAVQQACryptosporidiumP23QDKPADAPAAEAPA213parvumAEPAAQQDKPADAHIVGP120RKRIHIGPGR-314AFYITKNFoot-and-mouthVP1YNGECRYNRNA-415disease virusVPNLRGDLQVL-AQKVARTLPInfluenza VirusHAYRNLLWLTEK816A8/PR8Type AM2SLLTEVETPIR-2917(A8/PR8/34)NEWGCRCNGSSDSLLTEVETPIR-2918NEWGCRCNDSSDSLLTEVETPIR-19NEWGARANDSSDEQQSAVDADDS-3520HFVSIELESLLTEVETPIR-21NEWGSRSNDSSDSLLTEVETPIR-22NEWGSRCNDSSDSLLTEVETPIR-23NEWGCRSNDSSDSLLTEVETPIR-24NEWGCRANDSSDSLLTEVETPIR-25NEWGARCNDSSDMSLLTEVETPIR-26NEWGCRCNDSSDMSLLTEVETPIR-27NEWGSRSNDSSDMGISLLTEVETPIR-28NEWGCRCNDSSD-ELLGWLWGIMSLLTEVETPIR-29NEWGARANDSSDMSLLTEVETPIR-30NEWGCRANDSSDMSLLTEVETPIR-31NEWGARCNDSSDMSLLTEVETPIR-32NEWGCRSNDSSDMSLLTEVETPIR-33NEWGSRCNDSSDSLLTEVETPIRNEWGSRSNDSSDSLL-34TEVETPIRNEWGSRSNDSSDSLLTEVETPIRNEWGSRSNDSSDSLL-35TEVETPIRNEWGSRSNDSSDSLL-TEVETPIRNEWGSRSNDSSDSLLTEVETPIRNEWGARANDSSDSLL-36TEVETPIRNEWGARANDSSDSLLTEVETPIRNEWGARANDSSDSLL-37TEVETPIRNEWGARANDSSDSLL-TEVETPIRNEWGARANDSSDEVETPIRNEWGSRCNDSSD38EVETPIRNEWGSRCNDSSDEVET-39PIRNEWGSRCNDSSDEVETPIRNEWGSRCNDSSDEVET-40PIRNEWGSRCNDSSDEVE-TPIRNEWGSRCNDSSDX1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8TPIRNE-41X15X16X17X18X19X20-X21X22X23X24X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8TPIRNE-42X15X16X17X18X19X20-X21X22X23X24X1X2X3X4-X5X6X7X8TPIRNEX15X16-X17X18X19X20X21X22X23X24X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8TPIRNE-43X15X16X17X18X19X20X21X22-X23X24X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8-TPIRNEX15X16X17X18X19X20-X21X22X23X24X1X2X3X4X5-X6X7X8TPIRNEX15X16X17X18-X19X20X21X22X23X24X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8TX10X11-44RX13X14X15X16X17X18-X19X20X21X22X23X24X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8TX10X11-45RX13X14X15X16X17X18-X19X20X21X22X23X24X1X2-X3X4X5X6X7X8TX10X11R-X13X14X15X16X17X18X19-X20X21X22X23X24X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8TX10X11-46RX13X14X15X16X17X18-X19X20X21X22X23X24X1X2-X3X4X5X6X7X8TX10X11R-X13X14X15X16X17X18X19-X20X21X22X23X24X1X2X3-X4X5X6X7X8TX10X11RX13-X14X15X16X17X18X19X20-X21X22X23X24AvianM2MSLLTEVETPIR-452NEWGCRCNDSSDSLLTEVETPIR-453NEWGCRCNDSSDSwineM2MSLLTEVETPIR-454NEWGCRCNDSSDSLLTEVETPIR-455NEWGCRCNDSSDType BNBNNATFNYTNVNPISHIR47M2MLEPFQ409MLEPLQ410YersiniaV AgDILKVIVDSMNHH-948pestisGDARSKLREELAE-LTAELKIYSVIQA-EINKHLSSSGTIN-IHDKSINLMDKNL-YGYTDEEIFKASA-EYKILEKMPQTTI-QVDGSEKKIVSIK-DFLGSENKRTGAL-GNLKNSYSYNKDN-NELSHFATTCSDYscCGDIPYLGALFRRKSELTRRT451HaemophiluspBOMPCSSSNNDAA-1049influenzaGNGAAQFGGYNKLGTVSYGEE50NDEAAYSKN-51RRAVLAYMoraxellacopBLDIEKDKKK-1152catarrhalisRTDEQLQAELDDKYAGKGYLDIEKNKKK-53RTEAELQAE-LDDKYAGKGYIDIEKKGKI-54RTEAELLAE-LNKDYPGQGYPorphyromonasHAGVSPKVCKDVTV-1255gingivalisEGSNEFAPVQNLTRIQSTWRQKTV-56DLPAGTKYVTrypanosomaKAAIAPAKAAA-1457cruziAPAKAATAPAPlasmodiumCS(NANP)4249falciparumNANPNVDP-58(NANP)3NVDPNANPNVDP-59(NAMP)3(NANP)3NVDPNANP60NANPNVDP-61(NANP)3NVDPNANPNPNVDP(NANP)3NV62NPNVDP-63(NANP)3NVDPNPNVDP(NANP)3-64NVDPNANVDP(NANP)3NV65NVDP(NANP)3NVDP66NVDP(NANP)3-67NVDPNA67DP(NANP)3NV68DP(NANP)3NVDP69DP(NANP)3-70NVDPNAvivaxCSGDRADGQPAG-2071DRADGQPAGRADDRAAGQP-72AGDGQPAGANGAGNQPG-73ANGAGDQPGANGADNQPG-2774ANGADDQPGANGAGNQPG-75ANGADNQPGANGAGNQPG-76ANGADDQPGAPGANQEGGAA-2877APGANQEGGAAANGAGNQPGAN-78GAGDQPGANGA-DNQPGANGADD-QPGberghiCSDPPPPNPN-279DPPPPNPNyoelliCS(QGPGAP)480StreptococcusAgI/IlKPRPIYEA-1681sobrinusKLAQNQKAKADYEAK-82LAQYEKDLShigellaInvasinKDRTLIEQK1883flexneriRespiratoryGCSICSNNPT-1984syncitiaCWAICKvirus (RSV)EntamoebalectinVECASTVCQNDN-2185histolyticaSCPIIADVEKCNQSchistosomaparaDLQSEISLSLE-2286japonicumNGELIRRAKSA-ESLASELQRRVDSchistosomaparaDLQSEISLSLE-2287mansoniNSELIRRAKAA-ESLASDLQRRVDBovine Inhibinαc subunitSTPPLPWPW-3088SPAALRLLQ-RPPEEPAAEbola Virusmembrane-ATQVEQHHRR-3189anchoredTDNDSTAglycoproteinHNTPVYKLD-3190ISEATQVEGKLGLITNTI-3191AGVAVLIEscherichiaSTCCELCCYPACAGCN3392coliNTFYCCELCC-3393YPACAGCNSSNYCCELCC-3394YPACAGCNAlzheimer'sβ-AmyloidDAEFRHDSGYE-3495diseaseVHHQKLVFFAE-DVGSNKGAIIG-LMVGGVVIADAEFRHDSGYE-96VHHQKLEDVGSNKGAII97DAEFRHDSGYE-98VHHQKLVFFAE-DVGSNKGAIIGDAEFRHDSGYE-4499VHHQKLVFFAE-DVGSNKGAIINeisseriaPorAYVAVENGVAKKVA100meningitidisHFVQQTPKSQPTLVP101HVVVNNKVATHVP102PLQNIQPQVTKR103AQAANGGAASGQVKVTKVTKA104YVDEQSKYHA105HFVQNKQNQPPTLVP106KPSSTNAKTGNKVEVTKA107YWTTVNTGSATTTTFVP108YVDEKKKMVHA109HYTRQNNADVFVP110YYTKDTNNNLTLVP111PPQKNQSQPVVTKA112PPSKGQTGNKVTKG113PPSKSQPQVKVTKA114QPQTANTQQGGKVKVTKA115QPQVTNGVQGNQVKVTKA116QPSKAQGQTNNQVKVTKA117PPSSNQGKNQAQTGNTVTKA118PPSKSQGKTGNQVKVTKA119PPSKSQGTNNNQVKVTKA120PPSKSQPGQVKVTKVTKA121QLQLTEQPSSTNGQTGNQVKVTKA122QLQLTEAPSKSQGAASNQVKVTKA123SAYTPAHVYVDNKVAKHVA124SAYTPAHFVQNKQNNNPTLVP125VEGRNYQLQLTE126PAQNSKSAYTPA127QLQLTEPPSKNQAQTQNKVTKA128GRDAFELFLLGSGSDE129RHANVGRDAFELFLLGSGSDEA-130KGTDPLKNHGRDAFNLFLLGRIGDDDE131GRNAFELFLIGSATSDQ132QVKVTKAKSRIRTKI133TLVPAVVGKPGSD134NspAHAKASSSLGSAKGFSPR135TRYKNYKAPSTDFKL136SLNRASVDLGGSDSFSQT137GKVNTVKNVRSGELSAGVRVK138GKVNTVKNVRSGELSVGVRVK139Immunoglobulin EAPEWPGSRDKRTL140EDGQVMDVD141STTQEGEL142GHTFEDSTKK143GGGHFPPT144PGTINI145FTPPT146INHRGYWV147GEFCINHRGYWVCGDPA148MAPEWPGSRDKRTL149MEDGQVMDVD150MSTTQEGEL151MGHTFEDSTKK152MGGGHFPPT153MPGTINI154MFTPPT155MINHRGYWV156MGEFCINHRGYWVCGDPA157Hepatitis BSurfacePreS1MGTNLSVPN-37158PLGFFPDHQLDPPLGFFPDH159PLGFFPDHQL160PreS2MQWNSTAFHQ-37161TLQDPRVRG-LYLPAGGMQWSTAFHQ-162TLQDPMQWNSTALHQ-163ALQDPQDPRVR38164DPRVRG-39165LYLPAGGDPRVRG-40166LYFPAGGB. anthracisProtectiveIVTKENTII-42167AntigenNPSENGDTS-TNGIELHookwormAsp-1IVYQHSHG-43168EDRPGEL*Citations to published epitopes are provided following Table B.

[0151] For influenza A M2 polypeptide sequence X1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8TX10X11RX13X14X15X16X17X18X19X20X21-X22X23X24 of SEQ ID NO:44:

[0152] residues X1 through X8 are absent or present, and when present are the residues naturally present in the M2 protein sequence that are methionine, serine, leucine, leucine, threonine or proline, glutamic acid, valine, and glutamic acid, respectively, with the proviso that when one subscripted X residue is present, any remaining subscripted X with a higher subscript number up to 8 is also present,

[0153] X10 is present and is proline, leucine or histidine,

[0154] X11 is present and is isoleucine or threonine,

[0155] X13 is present and is asparagine or serine,

[0156] X14 is present and is glutamic acid or glycine,

[0157] residues X15 and X16 are present or absent, and when present are tryptophan and glycine or glutamic acid, respectively,

[0158] residues X17 and X19 are present or absent, and when present are independently cysteine, serine, or alanine,

[0159] residue X18 is present or absent, and when present is arginine or lysine, and

[0160] residues X20 through X24 are present or absent, and when present are the residues naturally present in the M2 protein sequence that are asparagine or serine, aspartic acid or glycine, serine, serine and aspartic acid respectively, with the proviso that when one subscripted X residue is present, any remaining subscripted X residue with a lower subscript number down to 15 is also present.

[0161] Similarly, in the preferred above influenza A M2 sequence of SEQ ID NO: 39:

[0162] residues X1 through X8 are absent or present, and when present are the residues naturally present in the M2 protein sequence that are methionine, serine, leucine, leucine, threonine, glutamic acid, valine, and glutamic acid, respectively, with the proviso that when one subscripted X residue is present, any remaining subscripted X with a higher subscript number up to 8 is also present,

[0163] residues X15 and X16 are present or absent, and when present are tryptophan and glycine, respectively,

[0164] residues X17 and X19 are present or absent, and when present are independently cysteine, serine, or alanine,

[0165] residue X18 is present or absent, and when present is arginine, and

[0166] residues X20 through X24 are present or absent, and when present are the residues naturally present in the M2 protein sequence that are asparagine, aspartic acid, serine, serine and aspartic acid respectively, with the proviso that when one subscripted X residue is present, any remaining subscripted X residue with a lower subscript number down to 15 is also present.

[0167] The remaining residues of Domain II that are present on either side of the heterologous residue or sequence are preferably residues of HBc position 76 through position 85. Thus, in an illustrative example, where residues 78 through 82 have been replaced, the chimer sequence in Domain II is 76 through 77, followed by restriction site-encoded residues, the immunogenic (epitope) sequence, further restriction site-encoded residues, and then HBc sequence 84 through 85. A typical exemplary sequence of a chimer prepared by an insertion strategy between residues 78 and 79 is that of HBc from position 2 through 78, followed by restriction site-encoded residues, the immunogenic sequence, further restriction site-encoded residues and HBc sequence 79 through 85. The sequence of other contemplated chimers through Domains I and II should be apparent from these illustrations and those that follow and need not be enumerated.

[0168] It has been found that a short hydrophilic peptide containing a plurality of glycine residues and having a length of about 5 to about 9 residues peptide-bonded at the C-terminus of an above-noted Neisseria meningitidis B cell epitope sequence can assist in the expression of a chimeric particle containing that sequence. One useful short peptide is that disclosed in Karpenko et al., (2000) Amino Acids 18:329-337, having the sequence GSGDGEGG of SEQ ID NO: 169.

[0169] As already noted, a heterologous linker for a conjugated epitope is peptide-bonded at a position in the HBc sequence between amino acid residues 76 and 85. As was the case for the immunogenic epitope, the HBc sequence of residues 76 through 85 is preferably present, but interrupted by the heterologous linker for a conjugated epitope. This chimer preferably includes the HBc sequence of position 4 through at least position 140, plus a cysteine residue near the N-terminus or the C-terminus of the chimer protein. More preferably, the HBc sequence of positions 2 through 149 are present, but interrupted between residues 76 and 85 by the heterologous linker for a conjugated epitope, and the chimer molecule contains a C-terminal cysteine.

[0170] The heterologous linker for a conjugated epitope is most preferably a lysine (K) residue. Glutamic or aspartic acid, tyrosine and cysteine residues can also be used as linker residues, as can tyrosine and cysteine residues. It is noted that more than one linker can be present such as a sequence of three lysines, but such use is not preferred because heterogeneous conjugates can be formed from such use in which the conjugated hapten is bonded to one linker in a first chimer and to a different linker in a second chimer molecule. U.S. Pat. No. 6,231,864 B1 discloses HBc chimer molecules containing one or more linking residues, but lacking a stabilizing N-terminal cysteine residue.

[0171] It is also noted that an immunogenic epitope-containing sequence present in a contemplated HBc chimer can also be separated from the HBc sequence residues by a “flexible linker arm” on one or both sides of (flanking) the immunogenic (epitope) sequence. This is particularly the case where the immunogenic sequence is greater than about 30 amino acid residues long. Exemplary flexible linker arm sequences typically contain about 4 to about 10 glycine residues that are thought to permit the inserted sequence to “bulge” outwardly from the otherwise bulging loop sequence and add further stability to the construct. These flexible linker arms are similar to those discussed before in relation to a Neisseria meningitidis B cell epitope sequence such as the peptide of SEQ ID NO: 125. Illustrative other flexible linker arm sequences are disclosed in Kratz et al. (March 1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 96:1915-1920 and are exemplified by the amino acid residue sequences:

3GGGGSGGGGTSEQ ID NO: 170GGGGSGGGG.SEQ ID NO: 171

[0172] The sequence immediately below is utilized at the C-terminus of an inserted epitope-containing sequence, whereas the sequence thereafter is used at each of the N- and C-termini of inserted immunogenic sequences

4GSGDEGGSEQ ID NO: 172GGGGSGGG.SEQ ID NO: 173

[0173] As was noted previously, Domain III constitutes the sequence of HBc from position 86 through position 135. Consequently, the sequence of the illustrative chimers discussed above for Domains I and II, can be extended so that the first-discussed chimer has the sequence of HBc from position 84 through position 140, and the second-discussed chimer has the sequence of HBc from position 79 through position 140.

[0174] Domain IV contains a sequence that (i) includes a HBc sequence from about position 136 through 140 and optionally through position 149, position 156 or less preferably position 163, or even through position 183, (ii) contains zero up to about three cysteine (Cys) residues, and (iii) up to about 75 amino acid residues in an immunogenic sequence that is preferably heterologous to HBc at position 163, and more preferably position 156, trough the C-terminus, with the proviso that Domain IV contains at least 5 amino acid residues of the HBc sequence from position 136 through 140. The Domain IV immunogenic sequence more preferably contains up to about 50 amino acid residues, and most preferably contains up to about 25 residues. The Domain IV sequence can thus be substantially any sequence, except the C-terminal HBc sequence from about position 163 to the C-terminus.

[0175] The length of the Domain IV sequence can be five residues; i.e., the residue of position 136 through 140, up to about 125 amino acid residues (up to about HBc position 183 plus up to about 75 immunogenic residues of an immunogenic sequence) including up to a total of three cysteines, with the length being sufficient so that a contemplated chimeric protein has a total length of about 135 to about 580 residues. Where an epitope peptide-bonded to one or both of Domains I or II contains up to about 30 or about 50 residues, respectively, as is preferred for those epitopes, more preferred lengths of the chimer molecule, including the Domain IV epitope, are about 150 to about 280 residues. Particularly preferred chimer molecules containing two immunogenic epitopes have a length of about 190 to about 210 residues. Freedom of the resulting particle from nucleic acid binding is determined by measuring the 280/260 absorbance ratio, as discussed previously.

[0176] The Domain IV sequence can include zero up to three Cys residues. When present, it is preferred that the one or more Cys residues be within about 30 residues from the C-terminus of the chimer molecule, and preferably at or within about five amino acid residues of the C-terminus of the chimeric protein molecule. In addition, when more than one Cys residue is present in a Domain IV sequence, it is preferred that those Cys residues be adjacent to each other.

[0177] It is preferred that the Domain IV sequence include a T cell epitope, a plurality of T cell epitopes that are the same or different or an additional B cell epitope for the organism against which a contemplated chimer is intended to be used as an immunogen. Exemplary Domain IV T cell epitope sequences are provided in Table B, below, as in Table A, with illustrative added C-terminal cysteine residues underlined (C).

5TABLE BT Cell EpitopesSEQOrganismGeneSequence*CitationID NOHIVP24GPKEPFRDY 3174VDRFYKCCorynebacteriumtoxinFQVVHNSYN- 5175diptheriaeRPAYSPGCBorreliaospAVEIKEGTVTLKRE- 6176burgdorferiIDKNGKVTVSLCTLSKNISKSG- 7177EVSVELNDCInfluenza VirusHASSVSSFERFEC 8178A8/PR8LIDALLGDPC32179TLIDALLGC32180NPFWRGENGRKTRS-36181AYERMCNILKGKLRVLSFIRGTKV-36182SPRGKLSTRGSLVGIDPFKLLQ-36183NSQVYSLIRPAVKGVGTMVMEL-36184IRMIKRGINDRNTrypanosomaSHNFTLVASVII-13185cruziEEAPSGNTCPlasmodiumMSP1SVQIPKVPYPNGIVYC15186falciparumDFNHYYTLKTGLEADC187PSDKHIEQYKKI-23KNSISC188EYLNKIQNSLST-26EWSPCSVT189P. vivaxYLDKVRATVGTE-190WTPCSVTP. yoeliiEFVKQISSQLTE-191EWSQCSVTStreptococcusAgI/IlKPRPIYEAKL-16192sobrinusAQNQKCAKADYEAKLA-193QYEKDLCLCMVNPRPQASGVYM-17194(lymphocyticGNLTAQCchoriomeningitisvirus)ClostridiumtoxQYIKANSKFIG-20195tetaniITELCNeisseriaPorBAIWQVEQKASIAGTDSGWC196meningitidisNYKNGGFFVQYGGAYKRHC197HNSQTEVAATLAYRFGNVC198PorBTPRVSYAHGFKGLVDDADC199RFGNAVPRISYAHGFDFIC200AFKYARHANVGRNAFELFC201SGAWLKRNTGIGNYTQINAC202AGEFGTLRAGRVANQC203IGNYTQINAASVGLRC204GRNYQLQLTEQPSRTC205SGSVQFVPAQNSKSAC206HANVGRDAFNLFLLGC207LGRIGDDDEAKGTDPC208SVQFVPAQNSKSAYKC209NYAFKYAKHANVGRDC210AHGFDFIERGKKGENC211GVDYDFSKRTSAIVSC212HDDMPVSVRYDSPDFC213RFGNAVPRISYAHGFDFIERGKKGENC214NYAFKYAKHANVGRDAFNLFLLGC215SGAWLKRNTGIGNYTQINAASVGLRC216SGSVQFVPAQNSKSAYTPAC217OpaBTGANNTSTVSDYFRNRITC218IYDFKLNDKFDKFKPYIGC219Opa-5dLSAIYDFKLNDKFKPYIGC220OpacNGWYINPWSEVKFDLNSRC221Hepatitis BSurfacePreS1MGTNLSVPN-37, 41PLGFFPDHQLDP158PLGFFPDH159PLGFFPDHQL160PreS2MQWNSTAFHQ-37TLQDPRVRG-LYLPAGG161MQWSTAFHQ-162TLQDPMQWNSTALHQ-163ALQDPQDPRVR38164CoreMDIDPYKEFGAT-45222VELLSFLPRDLLDTASALYR-45223EALESPEHCSPHHTWVGVNLEDPAS-45224RDLVVSYVNTNMGVVSYVNTNMGL-45225KFRQLLLWFHISCLTF-45226GRETVIEYLVLLWFHISCLTF-45227VSFGVWIRTPP-45228AYRPPNAPILVSFGVWIRTPPA45229PPAYRPPNAPIL45230WIRTPPAYRPPN45231PHHTALRQAIL-46232CWGELMTLA*Underlined C (C) is not from the native sequence.

[0178] Citations:

[0179] 1. EPO 786 521A.

[0180] 2. WO 98/07320.

[0181] 3. US No. 5,639,854.

[0182] 4. US No. 4,544,500.

[0183] 5. EPO 399001 B1.

[0184] 6. Bockenstedt et al. (1996) J. Immunol., 157, 12:5496.

[0185] 7. Zhong et al. (1996) Eur. J. Immunol., 26, 11:2749.

[0186] 8. Brumeanu et al. (1996) Immunotechnology, 2, 2:85.

[0187] 9. Hill et al. (1997) Infect. Immun., 65, 11:4476.

[0188] 10. EPO 432 220 B1.

[0189] 11. WO 98/06851.

[0190] 12. Kelly et al. (1997) Clin. Exp. Immunol., 110, 2:285.

[0191] 13. Kahn et al. (1997) J. Immunol., 159, 9:4444.

[0192] 14. WO 97/18475.

[0193] 15. Ohta et al. (1997) Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 114,1:15.

[0194] 16. Staffileno et al. (1990) Arch. Oral Biol., 35: Suppl. 47S.

[0195] 17. Saron et al. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94,7:3314.

[0196] 18. Corthesy et al. (1996) J. Biol. Chem., 271, 52:33670.

[0197] 19. Bastien et al. (1997) Virol., 234, 1:118.

[0198] 20. Yang et al. (1997) Vaccine, 15, 4:377.

[0199] 21. Lotter et al. (1997) J. Exp. Med., 185, 10:1793.

[0200] 22. Nara et al. (1997) Vaccine 15, 1:79.

[0201] 23. U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,782.

[0202] 24. Zavala et al. (1985) Science, 228:1436.

[0203] 25. Schodel et al. (1994) J. Exper. Med., 180:1037.

[0204] 26. Calvo-Calle et al. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 3:1362.

[0205] 27. Qari et al. (1992) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.,55(1-2):105.

[0206] 28. Qari et al. (1993) Lancet, 341(8848):780.

[0207] 29. Neirynck et al. (October 1999) Nature Med., 5(10):1157-1163.

[0208] 30. Thompson et al. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem., 226(3):751-764.

[0209] 31. Wilson et al. (2000) Science, 287:1664-1666.

[0210] 32. Brown et al. (1993) J. Virol., 67(5):2887-2893.

[0211] 33. U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,663.

[0212] 34. Schenk et al. (Jul. 8, 1999) Nature, 400(6740):116-117.

[0213] 35. Slepushkin et al. (1995) Vaccine, 13(15):1399-1402.

[0214] 36. Brett et al., (1991) J. Immunol., 147(3):984-991.

[0215] 37. Neurath et al., (1986) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 85, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.185-189.

[0216] 38. Kent et al., (1987) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 86, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.365-369.

[0217] 39. Milich et al., (1987) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 86, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.377-382.

[0218] 40. Thornton et al., (1987) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 87, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.77-80.

[0219] 41. Milich et al., (1987) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 87, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.50-55.

[0220] 42. Little et al., (1996) Microbiology 142:707-715.

[0221] 43. Provided by Dr. Peter Hotez, George Washington University.

[0222] 44. Morgan et al., (2000) Nature 408:982-985.

[0223] 45. U.S. Pat. No. 4,882,145.

[0224] 46. Alexander et al., (1994) Immunity 1:751-761.

[0225] 47. Muyanga et al., (2001) Arch. Virol. 146(9):1667-1679.

[0226] Another useful T cell epitope is a synthetic sequence referred to as a PADRE epitope (See, U.S. Pat. No. 6,413,517 to Sette et al.) One exemplary epitope is that disclosed by Alexander et al., (1994) Immunity, 5:751-761 that has the sequence AKFVAAWTLKAAA (SEQ ID NO: 233).

[0227] The amino acid sequence of HBc from residue position 4 through at least position 140 is preferably present in a contemplated chimer molecule and particle. The sequence from position 2 through position 149 and up to about position 163 is more preferably present. A B cell epitope, when present, is preferably present between residues 76 and 85. One or both of the cysteine residues normally present at HBc positions 48 and 107 are replaced (substituted) with another residue. At least a single cysteine residue is present at or near the N-terminus in Domain I as already noted or at or near the C-terminus, as discussed before. One or more T cell epitopes can also be present as an N-terminal or C-terminal addition to the HBc sequence. A contemplated recombinant HBc chimer is substantially free of bound nucleic acid. A contemplated chimer particle in which one or both of the cysteine residues normally present at HBc positions 48 and 107 is more stable than is a similar particle that does not contain those replacements; i.e., a chimer that contains the cysteines at positions 48 and 107.

[0228] A contemplated recombinant HBc chimer molecule is typically present and is used as a self-assembled particle. These particles are comprised of 180 to 240 chimer molecules (90 or 120 dimer pairs), usually 240 chimer molecules, that separate into protein molecules in the presence of disulfide reducing agents such as 2-mercaptoethanol, and the individual molecules are therefore thought to be bound together in the particle primarily by disulfide bonds. It is believed that the observed enhanced stability is due to the absence of one or both of the cysteines at positions 48 and 107.

[0229] These particles are similar to the particles observed in patients infected with HBV, but these particles are non-infectious. Upon expression by various prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts, the individual recombinant HBc chimer molecules assemble into particles that can be readily harvested from the host cells, nutrient solution of both, and purified, if desired.

[0230] As noted before, the HBc immunodominant loop is usually recited as being located at about positions 75 through about 85 from the amino-terminus (N-terminus) of the intact protein. An immunogenic epitope-containing sequence of Domain II is placed into that immunodominant loop sequence. That placement can substantially eliminate the HBc immunogenicity and antigenicity of the HBc loop sequence, while presenting the immunogenic sequence or linker residue in an extremely immunogenic position in the assembled chimer particles.

[0231] In addition to the before-discussed N- and C-truncations, insertion of various epitopes and spacers, a contemplated chimer molecule can also contain conservative substitutions in the amino acid residues that constitute HBc Domains I, II, III and IV. Conservative substitutions are as defined before. An illustrative conservative substitution is seen in the replacement of residues at positions 2 and 3 (aspartic acid and isoleucine; DI) by glutamic acid and leucine (EL) residues that are encoded by an EcoRI restriction site used to add nucleic acids that code for a desired N-terminal epitope, including an N-terminal cysteine residue. Further illustrative examples are the replacement of lysine residues at positions 7 and 97 by arginines, and the replacement of cysteines at positions 48 and 107 by serine residues.

[0232] More rarely, a “nonconservative” change, e.g., replacement of a glycine with a tryptophan, or of a cysteine with an alanine residue is contemplated. Analogous minor variations can also include amino acid deletions or insertions, or both. Guidance in determining which amino acid residues can be substituted, inserted, or deleted without abolishing biological activity or particle formation can be found using computer programs well known in the art, for example LASERGENE software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.) The HBc portion of a chimer molecule of the present invention; i.e., the portion having the HBc sequence that has other than a sequence or residue of an added immunogen, anti-antigen, linker, flexible linker arm or heterologous residue(s) that are a restriction enzyme artifact, most preferably has the amino acid residue sequence of subtype ayw that is shown in FIG. 1 (SEQ ID NO: 1), less any portion or portions of the subtype ayw sequence that are absent because of truncation at one or both termini. Typically, that sequence is that of HBc positions 2 through 149 or position 156. Somewhat less preferred are the corresponding amino acid residue sequences of subtypes adw, adw2 and adyw that are also shown in FIG. 1 (SEQ ID NOs: 2, 3 and 4). Less preferred still are the sequences of woodchuck and ground squirrel at aligned positions 2 through 149 or 2 through 156 that are the last two sequences of FIG. 1 (SEQ ID NOs: 5 and 6). As noted elsewhere, portions of different sequences from different mammalian HBc proteins can be used together in a single chimer.

[0233] When the HBc portion of a chimer molecule of the present invention as above described has other than a sequence of a mammalian HBc molecule corresponding to positions 2 through about 183, up to about 20 percent of the amino acid residues are substituted as compared to SEQ ID NO: 1 from position 2 through 183, and preferably position 2 through 163. It is preferred that up to about 10 percent, and more preferably up to about 5 percent, and most preferably up to about 3 percent of the amino acid residues are substituted as compared to SEQ ID NO: 1 from position 2 through 163.

[0234] A contemplated chimer of 183 HBc residues can therefore contain up to about 36 residues that are different from those of SEQ ID NO: 1 at positions 2 through 183, and preferably about 18 residues. More preferably, about 9 residues are different from the ayw sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1) at residue positions 2-183, and most preferably about 5 residues are different Differences in shorter sequences, e.g., 2-149, or 2-156, or 2-163 are proportional to those discussed before based on percentage. Substitutions, other than in the immunodominant loop of Domain II or at the termini, are preferably in the non-helical portions of the chimer molecule and are typically between residues 2 to about 15 and residues 24 to about 50 to help assure particle formation. See Koschel et al., (1999) J. Virol., 73(3):2153-2160.

[0235] Where a HBc sequence is truncated at the C-terminus beyond position 163 or at the N-terminus, or contains one or more deletions in the immunodominant loop, the number of substituted residues is proportionally fewer because the total length of the sequence is less than 163 residues. Deletions elsewhere in the molecule are considered conservative substitutions for purposes of calculation so that if, for example, Domain III were to have a C-terminus at position 133 instead of 135, two residues (134 and 135) would be presumed to be present for purposes of calculation.

[0236] Chimer Preparation

[0237] A contemplated chimeric HBc immunogen is typically prepared using the well-known techniques of recombinant DNA technology. Thus, sequences of nucleic acids that encode particular polypeptide sequences are added to and deleted from the precursor sequence that encodes HBc to form a nucleic acid that encodes a contemplated chimer.

[0238] An illustrative contemplated chimeric immunogen typically utilizes a cysteine residue present in the influenza A M2 sequence as the N-terminal cysteine. Primers for the preparation of such chimer molecules by in vitro mutagenesis of a polynucleotide encoding an HBc molecule are discussed hereinafter. When a cysteine-containing M2 polypeptide epitope is not present at the N-terminus, the N-terminal cysteine can be provided by in vitro mutagenesis using a primer that encodes just a cysteine-containing portion of the M2 polypeptide or a simple N-terminal start sequence such as Met-Cys- or Met-Gly-Cys-.

[0239] As was noted previously, the HBc immunodominant loop is usually recited as being located at about positions 75 through 85 from the amino-terminus (N-terminus) of the intact protein. The illustrative influenza A M2 B cell epitope-containing sequence can be placed into that immunodominant loop sequence of Domain II. That placement substantially diminishes the HBc immunogenicity and antigenicity of the HBc loop sequence, while presenting the influenza A M2 B cell epitope in an extremely immunogenic position in the assembled chimer particles.

[0240] One of two strategies is preferred for placing the heterologous epitope sequence into the loop sequence. The first strategy is referred to as replacement, in which DNA that codes for a portion of the immunodominant loop is excised and replaced with DNA that encodes a heterologous epitope such as a B cell sequence. The second strategy is referred to as insertion, in which a heterologous epitope is inserted between adjacent residues in the loop.

[0241] Site-directed mutagenesis using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used in one exemplary replacement approach to provide a chimeric HBc DNA sequence that encodes a pair of different restriction sites, e.g. EcoRI and SacI, one near each end of the immunodominant loop-encoding DNA. Exemplary residues replaced are 76 through 81. The loop-encoding section is excised, a desired sequence that encodes the heterologous B cell epitope is ligated-into the restriction sites and the resulting DNA is used to express the HBc chimer. See, for example, Table 2 of Pumpens et al., (1995) Intervirology, 38:63-74 for exemplary uses of this technique.

[0242] Alternatively, a single restriction site or two sites can be introduced into the region, the DNA cut with a restriction enzyme(s) to provide “sticky” or blunt ends, and an appropriate sticky- or blunt-ended heterologous DNA segment ligated into the cut region. Examples of this type of sequence replacement into HBc can be found in the work reported in Schodel et al., (1991) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 91, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.319-325, Schodel et al., Behring Inst. Mitt., 1997(98): p. 114-119 and Schodel et al., J. Exp. Med., (1994) 180(3): p. 1037-4, the latter two papers discussing the preparation of vaccines against malarial pathogens P. yoelii and P. berghei, respectively. A replacement strategy that results in a net removal of residues from the immunodominant loop is usually not used herein.

[0243] The insertion position within the HBc immunogenic loop and the presence of loop residues can be of import to the activity of the immunogen. Thus, as is illustrated in published PCT applications PCT/US01/25625 and PCT/US01/41759, placement of a malarial B cell epitope between HBc residues 78 and 79 provides a particulate immunogen that is ten to one thousand times more immunogenic than placement of the same immunogen in an excised and replaced region between residues 76 and 81. In addition, placement of the same malarial immunogen between residues 78 and 79 as compared to between residues 77 and 78 provided an unexpected enhancement in immunogenicity of about 15-fold.

[0244] Insertion is therefore generally preferred. In an illustrative example of the insertion strategy, site-directed mutagenesis is used to create two restriction sites adjacent to each other and between codons encoding adjacent amino acid residues, such as those at residue positions 78 and 79. This technique adds twelve base pairs that encode four amino acid residues (two for each restriction site) between formerly adjacent residues in the HBc loop.

[0245] Upon cleavage with the restriction enzymes, ligation of the DNA coding for the heterologous B cell epitope sequence and expression of the DNA to form HBc chimers, the HBc loop amino acid sequence is seen to be interrupted on its N-terminal side by the two residues encoded by the 5′ restriction site, followed toward the C-terminus by the heterologous B-cell epitope sequence, followed by two more heterologous, non-loop residues encoded by the 3′ restriction site and then the rest of the loop sequence. This same strategy can be used for insertion into Domain I of an N-terminal cysteine or N-terminal sequence as was reported in Neirynck et al., (1999) Nature Med., 5(10):1157-1163 or for insertion into Domain IV of a T cell epitope or one or more cysteine residues. A similar strategy using an insertion between residues 82 and 83 is reported in Schodel et al., (1990) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 90, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.193-198.

[0246] More specifically, a DNA sequence that encodes a C-terminal truncated HBc sequence (HBc149) is engineered to contain adjacent EcoRI and SacI sites between residues 78 and 79. Cleavage of that DNA with both enzymes provides one fragment that encodes HBc positions 1-783′-terminated with an EcoRI sticky end, whereas the other fragment has a 5′-terminal SacI sticky end and encodes residues of positions 79-149. Ligation of a synthetic nucleic acid having a 5′ AATT overhang followed by a sequence that encodes a desired B cell epitope and a AGCT 3,overhang provides a HBc chimer sequence that encodes that B cell epitope flanked on each side by two heterologous residues [Glylle (GI) and GluLeu (EL), respectively] between residues 78 and 79, while usually destroying the EcoRI site and preserving the SacI site.

[0247] A similar strategy can be used for insertion of a cysteine-containing sequence in Domain IV, such as a malarial T cell epitope that contains the P. falciparum CS protein sequence from position 326 through position 345 and is referred to herein as PF/CS326-345 (Pf-UTC). Here, EcoRI and HindIII restriction sites are engineered into the HBc DNA sequence after amino acid residue position 149. After digestion with EcoRI and HindIII, a synthetic DNA having the above AATT 5′overhang followed by a T cell epitope-encoding sequence, one or more stop codons and a 3′ AGCT overhang were ligated into the digested sequence to form a sequence that encoded HBc residues 1-149 followed by two heterologous residues (GI), the heterologous T cell epitope, the stop codon and the HindIII site.

[0248] PCR amplification using a forward primer having a SacI restriction site followed by a sequence encoding HBc beginning at residue position 79, followed by digestion with SacI and HindIII provided a sequence encoding HBc positions 79-149 plus the two added residues and the T cell epitope at the C-terminus. Digestion of the construct with SacI and HindIII and subsequent ligation with a B cell-containing construct provides the complete gene encoding a desired recombinant HBc chimer immunogen having the sequence, from the N-terminus, of HBc positions 1-78, two added residues, the B cell epitope (e.g. malarial), two added residues, HBc positions 79-149, two added residues, and the T cell epitope that is shown in FIG. 2C.

[0249] Similar techniques can be used to place a heterologous linker residue for conjugation of a B cell epitope onto the loop region sequence. Contemplated linker residues include lysine (Lys), which is particularly preferred, aspartic acid (Asp), glutamic acid (Glu), cysteine (Cys) and tyrosine (Tyr).

[0250] It is noted that the amino acid residue sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:1 contains a Glu and an Asp residue at positions 77 and 78. Nonetheless, introduction of an additional, heterologous, carboxyl-containing residue is still contemplated. The chemical reactivity of the existing glutamic and aspartic acids may be reduced by other factors. For example, it is known in the art that a neighboring proline, such as that found at position 79, can neutralize and thereby reduce the chemical reactivity of a proximal carboxyl group.

[0251] Here, using the first noted insertion strategy, five heterologous residues are placed into the loop sequence; one that is the heterologous linker residue for conjugating a B cell epitope and two residues adjacent on either side of that one residue that are themselves also adjacent to loop sequence residues and are an expression product of the inserted restriction sites (restriction enzyme artifacts). It is noted that one can also use site-directed mutagenesis to add a single codon into the HBc loop sequence that encodes the heterologous linker residue for a B cell epitope.

[0252] It is noted that the preferred use of two heterologous residues on either side of (flanking) a B cell or T cell epitope is a matter of convenience. As a consequence, one can also use zero to three or more added residues that are not part of the HBc sequence on either or both sides of an inserted sequence. One or both ends of the insert and HBc nucleic acid can be “chewed back” with an appropriate nuclease (e.g. S1 nuclease) to provide blunt ends that can be ligated together. Added heterologous residues that are neither part of the inserted B cell or T cell epitopes nor a part of the HBc sequence are not counted in the number of residues present in a recited Domain, unless those residues are conservative replacements for residues already present, as where the residues GluLeu replace AspIle in some of the constructs discussed hereinafter.

[0253] It is also noted that one can also synthesize all or a part of a desired recombinant HBc chimer nucleic acid using well-known synthetic methods as is discussed and illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,656,472 for the synthesis of the 177 base pair DNA that encodes the 59 residue ribulose bis-phosphate carboxylase-oxygenase signal peptide of Nicotiana tabacum. For example, one can synthesize Domains I and II with a blunt or a “sticky end” that can be ligated to Domains III and IV to provide a construct that expresses a contemplated HBc chimer that contains zero added residues to the N-terminal side of the B cell epitope and zero to three added residues on the C-terminal side or at the Domain II/III junction or at some other desired location.

[0254] An alternative insertion technique was reported in Clarke et al. (1991) F. Brown et al. eds., Vaccines 91, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp.313-318. Here, taking advantage of the degeneracy of the genetic code, those workers engineered a single restriction site corresponding to residues 80 and 81 that encoded the original residues present at those positions. Their expressed HBc chimers thereby contained no restriction site-encoded residues, and contained the residues of the HBc loop immediately adjacent to the inserted sequence.

[0255] A nucleic acid sequence (segment) that encodes a previously described HBc chimer molecule or a complement of that coding sequence is also contemplated herein. Such a nucleic acid segment is present in isolated and purified form in some preferred embodiments.

[0256] In living organisms, the amino acid residue sequence of a protein or polypeptide is directly related via the genetic code to the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence of the gene that codes for the protein. Thus, through the well-known degeneracy of the genetic code, additional DNAs and corresponding RNA sequences (nucleic acids) can be prepared as desired that encode the same chimer amino acid residue sequences, but are sufficiently different from a before-discussed gene sequence that the two sequences do not hybridize at high stringency, but do hybridize at moderate stringency.

[0257] High stringency conditions can be defined as comprising hybridization at a temperature of about 50°-55° C. in 6×SSC and a final wash at a temperature of 68° C. in 1-3×SSC. Moderate stringency conditions comprise hybridization at a temperature of about 50° C. to about 65° C. in 0.2 to 0.3 M NaCl, followed by washing at about 50° C. to about 55° C. in 0.2×SSC, 0.1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate).

[0258] A nucleic sequence (DNA sequence or an RNA sequence) that (1) itself encodes, or its complement encodes, a chimer molecule whose HBc portion from residue position 4 through 136, when present, is that of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 and (2) hybridizes with a DNA sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 or 239 at least at moderate stringency (see below); and (3) whose HBc sequence shares at least 80 percent, and more preferably at least 90 percent, and even more preferably at least 95 percent, and most preferably 100 percent identity with a DNA sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 and 239, is defined as a DNA variant sequence. As is well-known, a nucleic acid sequence such as a contemplated nucleic acid sequence is expressed when operatively linked to an appropriate promoter in an appropriate expression system as discussed elsewhere herein.

6HBC AYW DNA; SEQ ID NO:234atggacatcg acccttataa agaatttgga gctactgtgg agttactctc gtttttgcct 60tctgacttct ttccttcagt acgagatctt ctagataccg cctcagctct gtatcgggaa120gccttagagt ctcctgagca ttgttcacct caccatactg cactcaggca agcaattctt180tgctgggggg aactaatgac tctagctacc tgggtgggtg ttaatttgga agatccagcg240tctagagacc tagtagtcag ttatgtcaac actaatatgg gcctaaagtt caggcaactc300ttgtggtttc acatttcttg tctcactttt ggaagagaaa cagttataga gtatttggtg360tctttcggag tgtggattcg cactcctcca gcttatagac caccaaatgc ccctatccta420tcaacacttc cggagactac tgttgttaga cgacgaggca ggtcccctag aagaagaact480ccctcgcctc gcagacgaag gtctcaatcg ccgcgtcgca gaagatctca atctcgggaa540tctcaatgtHBc ADW DNA; SEQ ID NO:235atggacattg acccttataa agaatttgga gctactgtgg agttactctc gtttttgcct 60tctgacttct ttccttccgt acgagatctc ctagacaccg cctcagctct gtatcgagaa120gccttagagt ctcctgagca ttgctcacct caccatactg cactcaggca agccattctc180tgctgggggg aattgatgac tctagctacc tgggtgggta ataatttgca agatccagca240tccagagatc tagtagtcaa ttatgttaat actaacatgg gtttaaagat caggcaacta300ttgtggtttc atatatcttg ccttactttt ggaagagaga ctgtacttga atatttggtc360tctttcggag tgtggattcg cactcctcca gcctatagac caccaaatgc ccctatctta420tcaacacttc cggaaactac tgttgttaga cgacgggacc gaggcaggtc ccctagaaga480agaactccct cgcctcgcag acgcagatct caatcgccgc gtcgcagaag atctcaatct540cgggaatctc aatgtHBc ADW2 DNA; SEQ ID NO:236atggacattg acccttataa agaatttgga gctactgtgg agttactctc gtttttgcct 60tctgacttct ttccttccgt cagagatctc ctagacaccg cctcagctct gtatcgagaa120gccttagagt ctcctgagca ttgctcacct caccatactg cactcaggca agccattctc180tgctgggggg aattgatgac tctagctacc tgggtgggta ataatttgga agatccagca240tctagggatc ttgtagtaaa ttatgttaat actaacgtgg gtttaaagat caggcaacta300ttgtggtttc atatatcttg ccttactttt ggaagagaga ctgtacttga atatttggtc360tctttcggag tgtggattcg cactcctcca gcctatagac caccaaatgc ccctatctta420tcaacacttc cggaaactac tgttgttaga cgacgggacc gaggcaggtc ccctagaaga480agaactccct cgcctcgcag acgcagatct ccatcgccgc gtcgcagaag atctcaatct540cgggaatctc aatgtHBC ADYW DNA; SEQ ID NO:237atggacattg acccttataa agaatttgga gctactgtgg agttactctc gtttttgcct 60tctgacttct ttccttccgt acgagatctt ctagataccg ccgcagctct gtatcgggat120gccttagagt ctcctgagca ttgttcacct caccatactg cactcaggca agcaattctt180tgctggggag acttaatgac tctagctacc tgggtgggta ctaatttaga agatccagca240tctagggacc tagtagtcag ttatgtcaac actaatgtgg gcctaaagtt cagacaatta300ttgtggtttc acatttcttg tctcactttt ggaagagaaa cggttctaga gtatttggtg360tcttttggag tgtggattcg cactcctcca gcttatagac caccaaatgc ccctatccta420tcaacgcttc cggagactac tgttgttaga cgacgaggca ggtcccctag aagaagaact480ccctcgcctc gcagacgaag atctcaatcg ccgcgtcgca gaagatctca atctcgggaa540tctcaatgtWoodchuck DNA; SEQ ID NO:238atggctttgg ggcatggaca tagatcctta taaagaattt ggttcatctt atcagttgtt60gaattttctt cctttggact tctttcctga tcttaatgct ttggtggaca ctgctactgc120cttgtatgaa gaagaactaa caggtaggga acattgctct ccgcaccata cagctattag180acaagcttta gtatgctggg atgaattaac taaattgata gcttggatga gctctaacat240aacttctgaa caagtaagaa caatcattgt aaatcatgtc aatgatacct ggggacttaa300ggtgagacaa agtttatggt ttcatttgtc atgtctcact ttcggacaac atacagttca360agaattttta gtaagttttg gagtatggat caggactcca gctccatata gacctcctaa420tgcacccatt ctctcgactc ttccggaaca tacagtcatt aggagaagag gaggtgcaag480agcttctagg tcccccagaa gacgcactcc ctctcctcgc aggagaagat ctcaatcacc540gcgtcgcagGround Squirrel DNA; SEQ ID NO:239atgtatcttt ttcacctgtg ccttgttttt gcctgtgttc catgtcctac tgttcaagcc60tccaagctgt gccttggatg gctttgggac atggacatag atccctataa agaatttggt120tcttcttatc agttgttgaa ttttcttcct ttggactttt ttcctgatct caatgcattg180gtggacactg ctgctgctct ttatgaagaa gaattaacag gtagggagca ttgttctcct240catcatactg ctattagaca ggccttagtg tgttgggaag aattaactag attaattaca300tggatgagtg aaaatacaac agaagaagtt agaagaatta ttgttgatca tgtcaataat360acttggggac ttaaagtaag acagacttta tggtttcatt tatcatgtct tacttttgga420caacacacag ttcaagaatt tttggttagt tttggagtat ggattagaac tccagctcct480tatagaccac ctaatgcacc cattttatca actcttccgg aacatacagt cattaggaga540agaggaggtt caagagctgc taggtccccc cgaagacgca ctccctctcc tcgcaggaga600aggtctcaat caccgcgtcg cagacgctct caatctccag cttccaactg c651

[0259] An analog or analogous nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) sequence that encodes a contemplated chimer molecule is also contemplated as part of this invention. A chimer analog nucleic acid sequence or its complementary nucleic acid sequence encodes a HBc amino acid residue sequence that is at least 80 percent, and more preferably at least 90 percent, and most preferably is at least 95 percent identical to the HBc sequence portion from residue position 4 through residue position 140 shown in SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6. This DNA or RNA is referred to herein as an “analog of” or “analogous to” a sequence of a nucleic acid of SEQ ID NOs: 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 and 239, and hybridizes with the nucleic acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 and 239 or their complements herein under moderate stringency hybridization conditions. A nucleic acid that encodes an analogous sequence, upon suitable transfection and expression, also produces a contemplated chimer.

[0260] Different hosts often have preferences for a particular codon to be used for encoding a particular amino acid residue. Such codon preferences are well known and a DNA sequence encoding a desired chimer sequence can be altered using in vitro mutagenesis, for example, so that host-preferred codons are utilized for a particular host in which the enzyme is to be expressed. In addition, one can also use the degeneracy of the genetic code to encode the HBc portion of a sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 and 239 that avoids substantial identity with a DNA of SEQ ID Nos: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 or their complements. Thus, a useful analogous DNA sequence need not hybridize with the nucleotide sequences of SEQ ID Nos 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 and 239 or a complement under conditions of moderate stringency, but can still provide a contemplated chimer molecule.

[0261] A recombinant nucleic acid molecule such as a DNA molecule, comprising a vector operatively linked to an exogenous nucleic acid segment (e.g., a DNA segment or sequence) that defines a gene that encodes a contemplated chimer, as discussed above, and a promoter suitable for driving the expression of the gene in a compatible host organism, is also contemplated in this invention. More particularly, also contemplated is a recombinant DNA molecule that comprises a vector containing a promoter for driving the expression of the chimer in host organism cells operatively linked to a DNA segment that defines a gene for the HBc portion of a chimer or a DNA variant that has at least 90 percent identity to the chimer gene of SEQ ID NOs: 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 and 239 and hybridizes with that gene under moderate stringency conditions.

[0262] Further contemplated is a recombinant DNA molecule that comprises a vector containing a promoter for driving the expression of a chimer in host organism cells operatively linked to a DNA segment that is an analog nucleic acid sequence that encodes an amino acid residue sequence of a HBc chimer portion that is at least 80 percent identical, more preferably 90 percent identical, and most preferably 95 percent identical to the HBc portion of a sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6. That recombinant DNA molecule, upon suitable transfection and expression by a host cell, provides a contemplated chimer molecule.

[0263] It is noted that the 30 amino acid residue N-terminal sequence of ground squirrel HBc does not permit alignment with any of the other HBc sequences. That sequence and its encoding nucleic acid sequences and their complements are not included in the above percentages of identity, nor are the portions of nucleic acid that encode that 30-residue sequence or its complement used in hybridization determinations. Similarly, sequences that are truncated at either or both of the HBc N- and C-termini are not included in identity calculations, nor are those sequences in which residues of the immunodominant loop are removed for insertion of a heterologous epitope. Thus, only those HBc-encoding bases or HBc sequence residues that are present in a chimer molecule are included and compared to an aligned nucleic acid or amino acid residue sequence in the identity percentage calculations.

[0264] Inasmuch as the coding sequences for the gene disclosed herein is illustrated in SEQ ID NOs: 234, 235, 236, 237, 238 and 239 isolated nucleic acid segments, preferably DNA sequences, variants and analogs thereof can be prepared by in vitro mutagenesis, as is well known in the art and discussed in Current Protocols In Molecular Biology, Ausabel et al. eds., John Wiley & Sons (New York: 1987) p. 8.1.1-8.1.6, that begin at the initial ATG codon for a gene and end at or just downstream of the stop codon for each gene. Thus, a desired restriction site can be engineered at or upstream of the initiation codon, and at or downstream of the stop codon so that other genes can be prepared, excised and isolated.

[0265] As is well known in the art, so long as the required nucleic acid, illustratively DNA sequence, is present, (including start and stop signals), additional base pairs can usually be present at either end of the segment and that segment can still be utilized to express the protein. This, of course, presumes the absence in the segment of an operatively linked DNA sequence that represses expression, expresses a further product that consumes the enzyme desired to be expressed, expresses a product that consumes a wanted reaction product produced by that desired enzyme, or otherwise interferes with expression of the gene of the DNA segment.

[0266] Thus, so long as the DNA segment is free of such interfering DNA sequences, a DNA segment of the invention can be about 500 to about 15,000 base pairs in length. The maximum size of a recombinant DNA molecule, particularly an expression vector, is governed mostly by convenience and the vector size that can be accommodated by a host cell, once all of the minimal DNA sequences required for replication and expression, when desired, are present. Minimal vector sizes are well known. Such long DNA segments are not preferred, but can be used.

[0267] DNA segments that encode the before-described chimer can be synthesized by chemical techniques, for example, the phosphotriester method of Matteucci et al. (1981) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103:3185. Of course, by chemically synthesizing the coding sequence, any desired modifications can be made simply by substituting the appropriate bases for those encoding the native amino acid residue sequence. However, DNA segments including sequences discussed previously are preferred.

[0268] A contemplated HBc chimer can be produced (expressed) in a number of transformed host systems, typically host cells, although expression in acellular, in vitro, systems is also contemplated. These host cellular systems include, but are not limited to, microorganisms such as bacteria transformed with recombinant bacteriophage, plasmid, or cosmid DNA expression vectors; yeast transformed with yeast expression vectors; insect cell systems infected with virus expression vectors (e.g. baculovirus); plant cell systems transformed with virus expression vectors (e.g. cauliflower mosaic virus; tobacco mosaic virus) or with bacterial expression vectors (e.g., Ti plasmid); or appropriately transformed animal cell systems such as CHO, VERO or COS cells. The invention is not limited by the host cell system employed.

[0269] DNA segments containing a gene encoding the HBc chimer are preferably obtained from recombinant DNA molecules (plasmid vectors) containing that gene. Vectors capable of directing the expression of a chimer gene into the protein of a HBc chimer is referred to herein as an “expression vector”.

[0270] An expression vector contains expression control elements including the promoter. The chimer-coding gene is operatively linked to the expression vector to permit the promoter sequence to direct RNA polymerase binding and expression of the chimer-encoding gene. Useful in expressing the polypeptide coding gene are promoters that are inducible, viral, synthetic, constitutive as described by Poszkowski et al. (1989) EMBO J., 3:2719 and Odell et al. (1985) Nature, 313:810, as well as temporally regulated, spatially regulated, and spatiotemporally regulated as given in Chua et al. (1989) Science, 244:174-181.

[0271] One preferred promoter for use in prokaryotic cells such as E. coli is the Rec 7 promoter that is inducible by exogenously supplied nalidixic acid. A more preferred promoter is present in plasmid vector JHEX25 (available from Promega Corp., Madison Wis.) that is inducible by exogenously supplied isopropyl-β-D-thiogalacto-pyranoside (IPTG). A still more preferred promoter, the tac promoter, is present in plasmid vector pKK223-3 and is also inducible by exogenously supplied IPTG. The pKK223-3 plasmid can be successfully expressed in a number of E. coli strains, such as XL-1, TB1, BL21 and BLR, using about 25 to about 100 μM IPTG for induction. Surprisingly, concentrations of about 25 to about 50 μM IPTG have been found to provide optimal results in 2 L shaker flasks and fermentors.

[0272] Several strains of Salmonella such as S. typhi and S. typhimurium and S. typhimurium-E. coli hybrids have been used to express immunogenic transgenes including prior HBc chimer particles both as sources of the particles for use as immunogens and as live, attenuated whole cell vaccines and inocula, and those expression and vaccination systems can be used herein. See, U.S. Pat. No. 6,024,961; U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,799; U.S. Pat. No. 5,387,744; U.S. Pat. No. 5,297,441; Ulrich et al., (1998) Adv. Virus Res., 50:141-182; Tacket et al., (August 1997) Infect. Immun., 65(8):3381-3385; Schodel et al., (February 1997) Behring Inst. Mitt., 98:114-119; Nardelli-Haefliger et al., (December 1996) Infect. Immun., 64(12):5219-5224; Londono et al., (April 1996) Vaccine, 14(6):545-552, and the citations therein.

[0273] Expression vectors compatible with eukaryotic cells, such as those compatible with yeast cells or those compatible with cells of higher plants or mammals, are also contemplated herein. Such expression vectors can also be used to form the recombinant DNA molecules of the present invention. Vectors for use in yeasts such as S. cerivisiae or Pichia pastoris can be episomal or integrating, as is well known. Eukaryotic cell expression vectors are well known in the art and are available from several commercial sources. Normally, such vectors contain one or more convenient restriction sites for insertion of the desired DNA segment and promoter sequences. Optionally, such vectors contain a selectable marker specific for use in eukaryotic cells. Exemplary promoters for use in S. cerevisiae include the S. cerevisiae phosphoglyceric acid kinase (PGK) promoter and the divergent promoters GAL 10 and GAL 1, whereas the alcohol oxidase gene (AOX1) is a useful promoter for Pichia pastoris.

[0274] For example, to produce chimers in the methylotrophic yeast, P. pastoris, a gene that encodes a desired chimer is placed under the control of regulatory sequences that direct expression of structural genes in Pichia. The resultant expression-competent forms of those genes are introduced into Pichia cells.

[0275] More specifically, the transformation and expression system described by Cregg et al. (1987) Biotechnology, 5:479-485; (1987) Molecular and Cellular Biology, 12:3376-3385 can be used. A gene for a chimer V12.Pf3.1 is placed downstream from the alcohol oxidase gene (AOX1) promoter and upstream from the transcription terminator sequence of the same AOX1 gene. The gene and its flanking regulatory regions are then introduced into a plasmid that carries both the P. pastoris HIS4 gene and a P. pastoris ARS sequence (Autonomously Replicating Sequence), which permit plasmid replication within P. pastoris cells [Cregg et al. (1987) Molecular and Cellular Biology, 12:3376-3385].

[0276] The vector also contains appropriate portions of a plasmid such as pBR322 to permit growth of the plasmid in E. coli cells. The resultant plasmid carrying a chimer gene, as well as the various additional elements described above, is illustratively transformed into a his4 mutant of P. pastoris; i.e. cells of a strain lacking a functional histidinol dehydrogenase gene.

[0277] After selecting transformant colonies on media lacking histidine, cells are grown on media lacking histidine, but containing methanol as described Cregg et al. (1987) Molecular and Cellular Biology, 12:3376-3385, to induce the AOX1 promoters. The induced AOX1 promoters cause expression of the chimer protein and the production of chimer particles in P. pastoris.

[0278] A contemplated chimer gene can also be introduced by integrative transformation, which does not require the use of an ARS sequence, as described by Cregg et al. (1987) Molecular and Cellular Biology, 12:3376-3385.

[0279] Production of chimer particles by recombinant DNA expression in mammalian cells is illustratively carried out using a recombinant DNA vector capable of expressing the chimer gene in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. This is accomplished using procedures that are well known in the art and are described in more detail in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories (1989).

[0280] In one illustrative example, the simian virus (SV40) based expression vector, pKSV-10 (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Piscataway, N.J.), is subjected to restriction endonuclease digestion by NcoI and HindIII. A NcoI/HindIII sequence fragment that encodes the desired HBc chimer prepared as described in Example 1 is ligated into the expression plasmid, which results in the formation of a circular recombinant expression plasmid denominated pSV-Pf.

[0281] The expression plasmid pSV-Pf contains an intact E. coli ampicillin resistance gene. E. coli RR101 (Bethesda Research Laboratories, Gaithersburg, Md.), when transformed with pSV-Pf, can thus be selected on the basis of ampicillin resistance for those bacteria containing the plasmid. Plasmid-containing bacteria are then cloned and the clones are subsequently screened for the proper orientation of the inserted coding gene into the expression vector.

[0282] The above obtained plasmid, pSV-Pf, containing the gene that encodes a desired HBc chimer is propagated by culturing E. coli containing the plasmid. The plasmid DNA is isolated from E. coli cultures as described in Sambrook et al., above.

[0283] Expression of a chimer is accomplished by the introduction of pSV-Pf into the mammalian cell line, e.g., CHO cells, using the calcium phosphate-mediated transfection method of Graham et al.(1973) Virol., 52:456, or a similar technique.

[0284] To help ensure maximal efficiency in the introduction of pSV-Pf into CHO cells in culture, the transfection is carried out in the presence of a second plasmid, pSV2NEO (ATCC #37149) and the cytotoxic drug G418 (GIBCO Laboratories, Grand Island, N.Y.) as described by Southern et al. (1982) J. Mol. Appl. Genet., 1:327. Those CHO cells that are resistant to G418 are cultured, have acquired both plasmids, pSV2NEO and pSV-Pf, and are designated CHO/pSV-Pf cells. By virtue of the genetic architecture of the pSV-Pf expression vector, a chimer is expressed in the resulting CHO/pSV-Pf cells and can be detected in and purified from the cytoplasm of these cells. The resulting composition containing cellular protein is separated on a column as discussed elsewhere herein.

[0285] The choice of which expression vector and ultimately to which promoter a chimer-encoding gene is operatively linked depends directly on the functional properties desired, e.g. the location and timing of protein expression, and the host cell to be transformed. These are well known limitations inherent in the art of constructing recombinant DNA molecules. However, a vector useful in practicing the present invention can direct the replication, and preferably also the expression (for an expression vector) of the chimer gene included in the DNA segment to which it is operatively linked.

[0286] In one preferred embodiment, the host that expresses the chimer is the prokaryote, E. coli, and a preferred vector includes a prokaryotic replicon; i.e., a DNA sequence having the ability to direct autonomous replication and maintenance of the recombinant DNA molecule extrachromosomally in a prokaryotic host cell transformed therewith. Such replicons are well known in the art.

[0287] Those vectors that include a prokaryotic replicon can also include a prokaryotic promoter region capable of directing the expression of a contemplated HBc chimer gene in a host cell, such as E. coli, transformed therewith. Promoter sequences compatible with bacterial hosts are typically provided in plasmid vectors containing one or more convenient restriction sites for insertion of a contemplated DNA segment. Typical of such vector plasmids are pUC8, pUC9, and pBR329 available from Biorad Laboratories, (Richmond, Calif.) and pPL and pKK223-3 available from Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.

[0288] Typical vectors useful for expression of genes in cells from higher plants and mammals are well known in the art and include plant vectors derived from the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens described by Rogers et al. (1987) Meth. in Enzymol., 153:253-277 and mammalian expression vectors pKSV-10, above, and pCI-neo (Promega Corp., #E1841, Madison, Wis.). However, several other expression vector systems are known to function in plants including pCaMVCN transfer control vector described by Fromm et al. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82:58-24. Plasmid pCaMVCN (available from Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.) includes the cauliflower mosaic virus CaMV 35S promoter.

[0289] The above plant expression systems typically provide systemic or constitutive expression of an inserted transgene. Systemic expression can be useful where most or all of a plant is used as the source to a contemplated chimer molecule or resultant particles or where a large part of the plant is used to provide an oral vaccine. However, it can be more efficacious to express a chimer molecule or particles in a plant storage organ such as a root, seed or fruit from which the particles can be more readily isolated or ingested.

[0290] One manner of achieving storage organ expression is to use a promoter that expresses its controlled gene in one or more preselected or predetermined non-photosynthetic plant organs. Expression in one or more preselected storage organs with little or no expression in other organs such as roots, seed or fruit versus leaves or stems is referred to herein as enhanced or preferential expression. An exemplary promoter that directs expression in one or more preselected organs as compared to another organ at a ratio of at least 5:1 is defined herein as an organ-enhanced promoter. Expression in substantially only one storage organ and substantially no expression in other storage organs is referred to as organ-specific expression; i.e., a ratio of expression products in a storage organ relative to another of about 100:1 or greater indicates organ specificity. Storage organ-specific promoters are thus members of the class of storage organ-enhanced promoters.

[0291] Exemplary plant storage organs include the roots of carrots, taro or manioc, potato tubers, and the meat of fruit such as red guava, passion fruit, mango, papaya, tomato, avocado, cherry, tangerine, mandarin, palm, melons such cantaloupe and watermelons and other fleshy fruits such as squash, cucumbers, mangos, apricots, peaches, as well as the seeds of maize (corn), soybeans, rice, oil seed rape and the like.

[0292] The CaMV 35S promoter is normally deemed to be a constitutive promoter. However, recent research has shown that a 21-bp region of the CaMV 35S promoter, when operatively linked into another, heterologous usual green tissue promoter, the rbcS-3A promoter, can cause the resulting chimeric promoter to become a root-enhanced promoter. That 21-bp sequence is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,179. The chimeric rbcS-3A promoter containing the 21-bp insert of U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,179 is a useful root-enhanced promoter herein.

[0293] A similar root-enhanced promoter that includes the above 21-bp segment is the −90 to +8 region of the CAMV 35S promoter itself. U.S. Pat. No. 5,110,732 discloses that that truncated CaMV 35S promoter provides enhanced expression in roots and the radical of seed, a tissue destined to become a root. That promoter is also useful herein.

[0294] Another useful root-enhanced promoter is the −1616 to −1 promoter of the oil seed rape (Brassica napus L.) gene disclosed in PCT/GB92/00416 (WO 91/13922 published Sep. 19, 1991). E. coli DH5.alpha. harboring plasmid pRlambdaS4 and bacteriophage lambda.beta.1 that contain this promoter were deposited at the National Collection of Industrial and Marine Bacteria, Aberdeen, GB on Mar. 8, 1990 and have accession numbers NCIMB40265 and NCIMB40266. A useful portion of this promoter can be obtained as a 1.0 kb fragment by cleavage of the plasmid with HaeIII.

[0295] A preferred root-enhanced promoter is the mannopine synthase (mas) promoter present in plasmid pKan2 described by DiRita and Gelvin (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet, 207:233-241. This promoter is removable from its plasmid pKan2 as a XbaI-XbaII fragment.

[0296] The preferred mannopine synthase root-enhanced promoter is comprised of the core mannopine synthase (mas) promoter region up to position −138 and the mannopine synthase activator from −318 to −213, and is collectively referred to as AmasPmas. This promoter has been found to increase production in tobacco roots about 10- to about 100-fold compared to leaf expression levels.

[0297] Another root specific promoter is the about 500 bp 5′ flanking sequence accompanying the hydroxyproline-rich glycopeprotein gene, HRGPnt3, expressed during lateral root initiation and reported by Keller et al. (1989) Genes Dev., 3:1639-1646. Another preferred root-specific promoter is present in the about −636 to −1 5′ flanking region of the tobacco root-specific gene TORBF reported by Yamamoto et al. (1991) Plant Cell, 3:371-381. The cis-acting elements regulating expression are more specifically located by those authors in the region from about −636 to about −299 5′ from the transcription initiation site. Yamamoto et al. reported steady state mRNA production from the TORBF gene in roots, but not in leaves, shoot meristems or stems.

[0298] Still another useful storage organ-specific promoter are the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of the fruit-ripening gene E8 of the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. These regions and their cDNA sequences are illustrated and discussed in Deikman et al. (1988) EMBO J., 7(11):3315-3320 and (1992)Plant Physiol., 100:2013-2017.

[0299] Three regions are located in the 2181 bp of the 5′ flanking sequence of the gene and a 522 bp sequence 3′ to the poly (A) addition site appeared to control expression of the E8 gene. One region from −2181 to −1088 is required for activation of E8 gene transcription in unripe fruit by ethylene and also contributes to transcription during ripening. Two further regions, −1088 to −863 and −409 to −263, are unable to confer ethylene responsiveness in unripe fruit but are sufficient for E8 gene expression during ripening.

[0300] The maize sucrose synthase-1 (Sh) promoter that in corn expresses its controlled enzyme at high levels in endosperm, at much reduced levels in roots and not in green tissues or pollen has been reported to express a chimeric reporter gene, β-glucuronidase (GUS), specifically in tobacco phloem cells that are abundant in stems and roots. Yang et al. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 87:4144-4148. This promoter is thus useful for plant organs such as fleshy fruits like melons, e.g. cantaloupe, or seeds that contain endosperm and for roots that have high levels of phloem cells.

[0301] Another exemplary tissue-specific promoter is the lectin promoter, which is specific for seed tissue. The lectin protein in soybean seeds is encoded by a single gene (Le1) that is only expressed during seed maturation and accounts for about 2 to about 5 percent of total seed mRNA. The lectin gene and seed-specific promoter have been fully characterized and used to direct seed specific expression in transgenic tobacco plants. See, e.g., Vodkin et al. (1983) Cell, 34:1023 and Lindstrom et al. (1990) Developmental Genetics, 11:160.

[0302] A particularly preferred tuber-specific expression promoter is the 5′ flanking region of the potato patatin gene. Use of this promoter is described in Twell et al. (1987) Plant Mol. Biol., 9:365-375. This promoter is present in an about 406 bp fragment of bacteriophage LPOTI. The LPOTI promoter has regions of over 90 percent homology with four other patatin promoters and about 95 percent homology over all 400 bases with patatin promoter PGT5. Each of these promoters is useful herein. See, also, Wenzler et al. (1989) Plant Mol. Biol., 12:41-50.

[0303] Still further organ-enhanced and organ-specific promoter are disclosed in Benfey et al. (1988) Science, 244:174-181.

[0304] Each of the promoter sequences utilized is substantially unaffected by the amount of chimer molecule or particles in the cell. As used herein, the term “substantially unaffected” means that the promoter is not responsive to direct feedback control (inhibition) by the chimer molecules or particles accumulated in transformed cells or transgenic plant.

[0305] Transfection of plant cells using

[0306]

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
is typically best carried out on dicotyledonous plants. Monocots are usually most readily transformed by so-called direct gene transfer of protoplasts. Direct gene transfer is usually carried out by electroportation, by polyethyleneglycol-mediated transfer or bombardment of cells by microprojectiles carrying the needed DNA. These methods of transfection are well-known in the art and need not be further discussed herein. Methods of regenerating whole plants from transfected cells and protoplasts are also well-known, as are techniques for obtaining a desired protein from plant tissues. See, also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,618,988 and 5,679,880 and the citations therein.

[0307] A transgenic plant formed using Agrobacterium transformation, electroportation or other methods typically contains a single gene on one chromosome. Such transgenic plants can be referred to as being heterozygous for the added gene. However, inasmuch as use of the word “heterozygous” usually implies the presence of a complementary gene at the same locus of the second chromosome of a pair of chromosomes, and there is no such gene in a plant containing one added gene as here, it is believed that a more accurate name for such a plant is an independent segregant, because the added, exogenous chimer molecule-encoding gene segregates independently during mitosis and meiosis. A transgenic plant containing an organ-enhanced promoter driving a single structural gene that encodes a contemplated HBc chimeric molecule; i.e., an independent segregant, is a preferred transgenic plant.

[0308] More preferred is a transgenic plant that is homozygous for the added structural gene; i.e., a transgenic plant that contains two added genes, one gene at the same locus on each chromosome of a chromosome pair. A homozygous transgenic plant can be obtained by sexually mating (selfing) an independent segregant transgenic plant that contains a single added gene, germinating some of the seed produced and analyzing the resulting plants produced for enhanced chimer particle accumulation relative to a control (native, non-transgenic) or an independent segregant transgenic plant. A homozygous transgenic plant exhibits enhanced chimer particle accumulation as compared to both a native, non-transgenic plant and an independent segregant transgenic plant.

[0309] It is to be understood that two different transgenic plants can also be mated to produce offspring that contain two independently segregating added, exogenous (heterologous) genes. Selfing of appropriate progeny can produce plants that are homozygous for both added, exogenous genes that encode a chimeric HBc molecule. Back-crossing to a parental plant and out-crossing with a non-transgenic plant are also contemplated.

[0310] A transgenic plant of this invention thus has a heterologous structural gene that encodes a contemplated chimeric HBc molecule. A preferred transgenic plant is an independent segregant for the added heterologous chimeric HBc structural gene and can transmit that gene to its progeny. A more preferred transgenic plant is homozygous for the heterologous gene, and transmits that gene to all of its offspring on sexual mating.

[0311] Inasmuch as a gene that encodes a chimeric HBc molecule does not occur naturally in plants, a contemplated transgenic plant accumulates chimeric HBc molecule particles in a greater amount than does a non-transformed plant of the same type or strain when both plants are grown under the same conditions.

[0312] The phrase “same type” or “same strain” is used herein to mean a plant of the same cross as or a clone of the untransformed plant. Where alleic variations among siblings of a cross are small, as with extensively inbred plant, comparisons between siblings can be used or an average arrived at using several siblings. Otherwise, clones are preferred for the comparison.

[0313] Seed from a transgenic plant is grown in the field greenhouse, window sill or the like, and resulting sexually mature transgenic plants are self-pollinated to generate true breeding plants. The progeny from these plants become true breeding lines that are evaluated for chimeric HBc molecule particle accumulation, preferably in the field, under a range of environmental conditions.

[0314] A transgenic plant homozygous for chimeric HBc molecule particle accumulation is crossed with a parent plant having other desired traits. The progeny, which are heterozygous or independently segregatable for chimeric HBc molecule particle accumulation, are backcrossed with one or the other parent to obtain transgenic plants that exhibit chimeric HBc molecule particle accumulation and the other desired traits. The backcrossing of progeny with the parent may have to be repeated more than once to obtain a transgenic plant that possesses a number of desirable traits.

[0315] An insect cell system can also be used to express a HBc chimer. For example, in one such system Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcNPV) or baculovirus is used as a vector to express foreign genes in Spodoptera frugiperda cells or in Trichoplusia larvae.

[0316] The sequences encoding a chimer can be cloned into a non-essential region of the virus, such as the polyhedrin gene, and placed under control of the polyhedrin promoter. Successful insertion of chimer sequence renders the polyhedrin gene inactive and produces recombinant virus lacking coat protein. The recombinant viruses can then be used to infect, for example, S. Frugiperda cells or Trichoplusia larvae in which the HBc chimer can be expressed. E. Engelhard et al. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 91:3224-3227; and V. Luckow, Insect Cell Expression Technology, pp. 183-218, in Protein Engineering: Principles and Practice, J. L. Cleland et al. eds., Wiley-Liss, Inc, 1996). Heterologous genes placed under the control of the polyhedrin promoter of the Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (ACNPV) are often expressed at high levels during the late stages of infection.

[0317] Recombinant baculoviruses containing the chimeric gene are constructed using the baculovirus shuttle vector system (Luckow et al. (1993) J. Virol., 67:4566-4579], sold commercially as the Bac-To-Bac™ baculovirus expression system (Life Technologies). Stocks of recombinant viruses are prepared and expression of the recombinant protein is monitored by standard protocols (O'Reilly et al., Baculovirus Expression Vectors: A Laboratory Manual, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1992; and King et al., The Baculovirus Expression System: A Laboratory Guide, Chapman & Hall, London, 1992).

[0318] A variety of methods have been developed to operatively link DNA to vectors via complementary cohesive termini or blunt ends. For instance, complementary homopolymer tracts can be added to the DNA segment to be inserted into the vector DNA. The vector and DNA segment are then joined by hydrogen bonding between the complementary homopolymeric tails to form recombinant DNA molecules.

[0319] Alternatively, synthetic linkers containing one or more restriction endonuclease sites can be used to join the DNA segment to the expression vector, as noted before. The synthetic linkers are attached to blunt-ended DNA segments by incubating the blunt-ended DNA segments with a large excess of synthetic linker molecules in the presence of an enzyme that is able to catalyze the ligation of blunt-ended DNA molecules, such as bacteriophage T4 DNA ligase. Thus, the products of the reaction are DNA segments carrying synthetic linker sequences at their ends. These DNA segments are then cleaved with the appropriate restriction endonuclease and ligated into an expression vector that has been cleaved with an enzyme that produces termini compatible with those of the synthetic linker. Synthetic linkers containing a variety of restriction endonuclease sites are commercially available from a number of sources including New England BioLabs, Beverly, Mass.

[0320] A desired DNA segment can also be obtained using PCR technology in which the forward and reverse primers contain desired restriction sites that can be cut after amplification so that the gene can be inserted into the vector. Alternatively PCR products can be directly cloned into vectors containing T-overhangs (Promega Corp., A3600, Madison, Wis.) as is well known in the art.

[0321] The expressed chimeric protein self-assembles into particles within the host cells, whether in single cells or in cells within a multicelled host. The particle-containing cells are harvested using standard procedures, and the cells are lysed using a French pressure cell, lysozyme, sonicator, bead beater or a microfluidizer (Microfluidics International Corp., Newton Mass.). After clarification of the lysate, particles are precipitated with 45 percent ammonium sulfate, resuspended in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 and dialyzed against the same buffer. The dialyzed material is clarified by brief centrifugation and the supernatant subjected to gel filtration chromatography using Sepharose CL-4B. Particle-containing fractions are identified, subjected to hydroxyapatite chromatography, and reprecipitated with ammonium sulfate prior to resuspension, dialysis and sterile filtration and storage at −70° C.

[0322] HBc Chimer Conjugates

[0323] Any hapten (immunogen) to which a B cell or T cell response is desired can be linked to a contemplated HBc chimer or chimer particle such as a chimer particle containing a heterologous linker residue such as a lysine, glutamic or aspartic acid, cysteine or tyrosine in the loop region of Domain II and an added cysteine residue near the N-terminus in Domain I to form a HBc chimer conjugate. The hapten of interest typically is a B cell immunogen. The hapten can be a polypeptide, a protein, a carbohydrate (saccharide; i.e., oligo- or polysaccharide), or a non-polypeptide, non-carbohydrate chemical such as 2,4-dinitrobenzene or a medicament such as cocaine or nicotine. Illustrative saccharide compounds include lipooligosaccharides (LOS) of NTHi or M. cat. [Sun et. al. (2000) Vaccine 2000, 18(13):1264-1272; and Jiao et. al. (2002) Infect. Immun., 70(11):5982-5989]. LOS consist of a hydrophobic lipid A portion and a hydrophilic core oligosaccharide portion and are one of the major components in the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria. Detoxified LOS (dLOS) molecules are de-O-acylated or de-N-acylated, or both, and exhibit about 100- to about 10,000-fold diminished endotoxicity compared with the starting LOS in the Limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) assay as described in Hochstein (1990) in Clinical application of the Limulus amoebocyte lysate test, R. B. Prior, ed. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla., pages 38-49.

[0324] There are many methods known in the art to couple carrier proteins to polysaccharides. Aldehyde groups can be prepared on either the reducing end (Anderson (1983) Infect. Immun., 39:233-238; Jennings et al. (1981) J. Immunol., 127:1011-1018; Poren et al. (1985) Mol. Immunol., 22:907-919] or the terminal end [Anderson et al. (1986) J. Immunol., 137:1181-1186; Beuvery et al. (1986) Dev. Bio. Scand., 65:197-204] of an oligosaccharide or relatively small polysaccharide, which can be linked to the carrier protein via reductive amination. In addition, oxidation of adjacent hydroxyls by periodate ion followed by reductive amination of the resulting aldehyde using cyanoborohydride is particularly useful for those HBc chimer molecules having an added α-amine-supplying lysine residue added into the immunogenic loop of the chimer.

[0325] Large polysaccharides can be conjugated by either terminal activation [Anderson et al.(1986) J. Immunol., 137:1181-1186] or by random activation of several functional groups along the polysaccharide chain [Chu et al. (1983) Infect. Immun., 40:245-256; Gordon, U.S. Pat. No. 4,619,828 (1986); Marburg, U.S. Pat. No. 4,882,317 (1989)]. Random activation of several functional groups along the polysaccharide chain can lead to a conjugate that is highly cross-linked due to random linkages along the polysaccharide chain. The optimal ratio of polysaccharide to carrier protein depends on the particular polysaccharide, the carrier protein, and the conjugate used.

[0326] Detailed reviews of methods of conjugation of saccharide to carrier proteins can be found in Dick et al., in Contributions to Microbiology and Immunology, Vol. 10, Cruse et al., eds., (S. Karger: 1989), pages 48-114; Jennings et al., in Neoglycoconjugates: Preparation and Applications, Lee et al., eds., (Academic Press: 1994), pages 325-371; Aplin et al., (1981) CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem., 10:259-306; and Stowell et al.(1980) Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem., 37:225-281.

[0327] The carbohydrate itself can be synthesized by methods known in the art, for example by enzymatic glycoprotein synthesis as described by Witte et al. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119:2114-2118.

[0328] Several oligosaccharides, synthetic and semi-synthetic, and natural, are discussed in the following paragraphs as examples of oligosaccharides that are contemplated haptens to be used in making a HBc conjugate of the present invention.

[0329] An oligosaccharide hapten suitable for preparing vaccines for the treatment of Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib) is made up of from 2 to 20 repeats of D-ribose-D-ribitol-phosphate (I, below), D-ribitol-phosphate-D-ribose (II, below), or phosphate-D-ribose-D-ribitol (III, below). Eduard C. Beuvery et al., EP-0 276 516-B1.

[0330] U.S. Pat. No. 4,220,717 also discloses a polyribosyl ribitol phosphate (PRP) hapten for Haemophilus influenzae type b.

[0331] Peterson et al. (1998) Infect. Immun., 66(8):3848-3855, disclose a trisaccharide hapten, αKdo(2 8)αKdo(2 4)αKdo, that provides protection from Chlamydia pneumoniae. Chlamydia pneumoniae is a cause of human respiratory infections ranging from pharyngitis to fatal pneumonia. Kdo is 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid.

[0332] Andersson et al., EP-0 126 043-A1, disclose saccharides that can be used in the treatment, prophylaxis or diagnosis of bacterial infections caused by Streptococci pneumoniae. One class of useful saccharides is derived from the disaccharide GlcNAcβ1 3Gal. Andersson et al., above, also reported neolactotetraosylceramide to be useful, which is Galβ1 4GlcNAcp1 3Galp1 4Glc-Cer.

[0333] McKenney et al. (1999) Science, 284:1523-1527, disclose a polysaccharide, poly-N-succinyl β1 6GlcN (PNSG) that provides protection from Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus is a common cause of community-acquired infections, including endocarditis, osetemylitis, septic arthritis, pneumonia, and abscesses.

[0334] European Patent No. 0 157 899-B1 discloses the isolation of pneumococcal polysaccharides that are useful in the present invention. The following table lists the pneumococcal culture types that produce capsular polysaccharides useful as haptens in the present invention.

7Polysaccharide Hapten SourcesDanish TypeU.S.1978 ATCC CatalogueNomenclatureNomenclatureNumber 116301 226302 336303 446304 55 6A66306 6B266326 7F5110351 886308 9N96309 9V6810A3411A4312F1263121414631415B5417F1718C561035619A5719F1963192020632022F2223F2363232525632533F70

[0335]

Moraxella
(Branhamella) catarrhalis is a reported cause of otitis media and sinusitis in children and lower respiratory tract infections in adults. The lipid A portion of the lipooligo-saccharide (LOS) surface antigen of the bacterium is cleaved at the 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic acid-glucosanine linkage. The cleavage product is treated with mild alkali or hydrazine to remove ester-linked fatty acids, while preserving amide-linked fatty acids to yield detoxified lipooligosaccharide (dLOS) from M. catarrhalis. The dLOS is not immunogenic until it is attached to a protein carrier. Xin-Xing Gu et al. (1998) Infect. Immun., 66(5):1891-1897.

[0336] Group B streptococci (GBS) cause of sepsis, meningitis, and related neurologic disorders in humans. The capsular polysaccharide-specific antibodies are known to protect human infants from infection. Jennings et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,795,580. The repeating unit of the GBS capsular polysaccharide type II is: 4)-β-D-GlcpNAc-(1 3)-[β-D-Galp(1 6)]-β-D-Galβ(1 4)-β-D-Glcp-(1 3)-β-D-Glcp-(1 2)-[α-D-NeupNAc(2 3)]-β-D-Galp-(1, where the bracketed portion is a branch connected to the unbracketed subunit immediately following. The repeating unit of GBS capsular polysaccharide type V is: 4)-[α-D-NeupNAc-(2 3)-β-D-Galp-(1 4)-β-D-GlcpNAc-(1 6)]-β-D-Glcp-(1 4)-[β-D-Glcp-(1 3)]-β-D-Galp-(1 4)-β-D-Glcp-(1.

[0337] European patent application No. EU-0 641 568-A1, Brade, discloses the method of obtaining ladder-like banding pattern antigen from Chlamydia trachomatis, pneumoniae and psittaci.

[0338] Slovin et al., (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 96(10):5710-5715 report use of a synthetic oligosaccharide, globo H, linked to KLH as a carrier in the preparation of a vaccine used against prostate cancer. Similarly, Helling et al., (July 1995) Cancer Res., 55:2783-2788 report the use of KLH-linked GM2 in a vaccine for treating patients with melanoma. The latter vaccine was prepared by ozone cleavage of the ceramide double bond of GM2, introduction of an aldehyde group and reductive amination onto KLH. A similar procedure can be utilized with a contemplated chimer particle.

[0339] Oligosaccharidal portions of sphingolipids such as globosides and gangliosides that are present on the surface of other tumor cells as well as normal cells such as melanoma, neuroblastoma and healthy brain cells, can similarly be used herein as haptens. The oligosaccharide portion of the globoside globo H has the structure Fucα-(1 2)-Galβ(1 3)-GalNAcβ-(1 3)-Gala-(1 4)-Galβ-(1 4)Glc, whereas the saccharide protions of gangliosides GM2, GM1 and GD1a have the following structures: GalNAcp-(1 4)-[NeuAca-(2 3)]-Galβ-(1 4)-Glc; Galβ-(1 3)-GalNAcβ-(14)-[NeuAcα-(23)]-Galβ-(1 4)-Glc; and NeuAc-(2 3)-Galβ-(1 3)-GalNAcβ-(1 4)-[NeuAca-(2 3)]-Galβ-(1 4)-Glc, respectively.

[0340] U.S. Pat. No. 4,356,170 discloses the preparation of useful polysaccharides that are reduced and then oxidized to form compounds having terminal aldehyde groups that can be reductively aminated onto free amine groups of carrier proteins such as tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid with or without significant cross-linking. Exemplary useful bacterial polysaccharides include β-hemolytic streptococci, Haemophilus influenza, meningococci, pneumococci and E. coli. Rather than reductively aminating the particles, a linker arm such as that provided by an α-amino C2-C8 alkylcarboxylic acid can be reductively aminated on to the polysaccharide, followed by linkage to the particles using a water-soluble carbodiimide.

[0341] It is thus seen that the word “hapten” is used herein somewhat more broadly than is usual, to include small molecules that do not themselves induce an immune response, as well as larger molecule such as proteins that often can themselves induce an immune response. An HBc chimer particle conjugate so formed is useful as an inoculum or vaccine, as is discussed hereinafter. Because the chimer protein self assembles after expression and a conjugate is formed after expression, conjugate formation is typically done using the assembled particles as compared to the free protein molecules.

[0342] Methods for operatively linking individual haptens (immunogens) to a protein or polypeptide through an amino acid residue side chain of the protein or polypeptide to form a pendently-linked immunogenic conjugate, e.g., a branched-chain polypeptide polymer, are well known in the art. Those methods include linking through one or more types of functional groups on various side chains and result in the carrier protein polypeptide backbone (here, a HBc chimer) within the particle being pendently linked—covalently linked (coupled)—to the hapten but separated by at least one side chain.

[0343] Methods for linking carrier proteins to haptens using each of the above functional groups are described in Erlanger, (1980) Method of Enzymology, 70:85; Aurameas et al., (1978) Scand. J. Immunol., Vol. 8, Suppl. 7, 7-23 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,493,795 to Nestor et al. In addition, a site-directed coupling reaction, as described in Rodwell et al. (1985) Biotech., 3:889-894 can be carried out so that the biological activity of the polypeptides is not substantially diminished.

[0344] Furthermore, as is well known in the art, both the HBc protein and a polypeptide hapten can be used in their native form or their functional group content can be modified by succinylation of lysine residues or reaction with cysteine-thiolactone. A sulfhydryl group can also be incorporated into either carrier protein or conjugate by reaction of amino functional groups with 2-iminothiolane, the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of 3-(3-dithiopyridyl)-propionate, or other reagents known in the art.

[0345] The HBc chimer or hapten can also be modified to incorporate a spacer arm, such as hexamethylenediamine or another bifunctional molecule, to facilitate the pendent linking. Such a procedure is discussed below.

[0346] Methods for covalent bonding of a polypeptide hapten are extremely varied and are well known by workers skilled in the immunological arts. For example, following U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,527, m-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (ICN Biochemicals, Inc., Costa Mesa, Calif.) or succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC, Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill.) is reacted with an appropriate HBc chimer to form an activated carrier. That activated carrier is then reacted with a hapten such as a sulfhydryl-terminated hapten or a polypeptide that either contains a terminal cysteine or to which an additional amino- or carboxy-terminal cysteine residue has been added to form a covalently bonded HBc chimer conjugate. As an alternative example, the amino group of a polypeptide hapten can be first reacted with N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridylthio)propionate (SPDP, Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.), and that thiol-containing polypeptide can be reacted with the activated carrier after reduction. Of course, the sulfur-containing moiety and double bond-containing Michael acceptor can be reversed. These reactions are described in the supplier's literature, and also in Kitagawa, et al. (1976) J. Biochem., 79:233 and in Lachmann et al., in 1986 Synthetic Peptides as Antigens, (Ciba Foundation Symposium 119), pp. 25-40 (Wiley, Chichester: 1986). See also, FIG. 5.

[0347] U.S. Pat. No. 4,767,842 teaches several modes of covalent attachment between a carrier and polypeptide that are useful here. In one method, tolylene diisocyanate is reacted with the carrier in a dioxane-buffer solvent at zero degrees C. to form an activated carrier. A polypeptide hapten is thereafter admixed and reacted with the activated carrier to form the covalently bonded HBc chimer conjugate.

[0348] Particularly useful are a large number of heterobifunctional agents that form a disulfide link at one functional group end and an amide link at the other, including N-succidimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio)-propionate (SPDP), discussed before that creates a disulfide linkage between itself and a thiol in either the HBc chimer or the hapten. Exemplary reagents include a cysteine residue in a polypeptide hapten and an amine on the coupling partner such as the α-amine of a lysine or other free amino group in the carrier protein. A variety of such disulfide/amide forming agents are known. See for example Immun. Rev. (1982) 62:185.

[0349] Other bifunctional coupling agents form a thioether rather than a disulfide linkage. Many of these thioether-forming agents are commercially available and include reactive esters of 6-maleimidocaproic acid, 2-bromoacetic acid, 2-iodoacetic acid, 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylic acid and the like. The carboxyl groups can be activated by combining them with succinimide or 1-hydroxy-2-nitro-4-sulfonic acid, sodium salt. The particularly preferred coupling agent for the method of this invention is succinimidyl 4-(maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC) obtained from Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill. Another heterobifunctional cross-linker is N-[γ-maleimidobutyroxy)succinimide ester (GMBS) and its sulfonate salt (sulfo-GMBS), and similar compounds as are available from Pierce Chemical Co. The foregoing list is not meant to be exhaustive, and modifications of the named compounds can clearly be used. FIG. 5 provides a schematic representation (Scheme 1) of the formation of a HBc activated carrier using SMCC (I) and the subsequent reaction of that activated carrier with a sulfhydryl-terminated hapten (II).

[0350] A polypeptide hapten can be obtained in a number of ways well known in the art. Usual peptide synthesis techniques can be readily utilized. For example, recombinant and PCR-based techniques to produce longer peptides are useful. Because the desired sequences are usually relatively short, solid phase chemical synthesis is useful.

[0351] Exemplary polypeptide haptens are shown in Tables A and B hereinbefore. Each of those polypeptides can be utilized via its N-terminal amino group, or by use of an additional N-terminal cysteine that is not shown in the table.

[0352] Related chemistry is used to couple what may be called “chemical compounds” to carrier proteins. Typically, an appropriate functional group for coupling is designed into the chemical compound. An exemplary chemical hapten to which induced antibodies protect against Streptococcus pneumoniae is 6-O-phosphocholine hydroxyhexanoate. Fischer et al. (1995) J. Immunol., 154:3373-3382. The table below provides further exemplary chemical haptens.

[0353] Further specifics concerning useful haptens can be found in before-mentioned, and now published, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/930,915 and the other parental applications.

[0354] Inocula and Vaccines

[0355] In yet another embodiment of the invention, a HBc chimer particle or HBc chimer particle conjugate with a hapten is used as the immunogen of an inoculum or vaccine in an human patient or suitable animal host such as a chimpanzee, mouse, rat, horse, sheep or the like. An inoculum can induce a B cell or T cell response (stimulation) such as production of antibodies that immunoreact with the immunogenic epitope or hapten, or T cell activation, whereas a vaccine provides protection against the entity from which the immunogen has been derived via one or both of a B cell or T cell response.

[0356] T cell activation can be measured by a variety of techniques. In usual practice, a host animal is inoculated with a contemplated HBc chimer particle vaccine or inoculum, and peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PMBC) are thereafter collected. Those PMBC are then cultured in vitro in the presence of the T cell immunogen for a period of about three to five days. The cultured PMBC are then assayed for proliferation or secretion of a cytokine such as IL-2, GM-CSF of IFN-γ. Assays for T cell activation are well known in the art. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,478,726 and the art cited therein.

[0357] Using antibody formation as exemplary, a contemplated inoculum or vaccine comprises an immunogenically effective amount of HBc chimer particles or HBc chimer particle conjugates that are dissolved or dispersed in a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent composition that typically also contains water. When administered to a host animal in need of immunization or in which antibodies are desired to be induced such as a mammal (e.g., a mouse, dog, goat, sheep, horse, bovine, monkey, ape, or human) or bird (e.g., a chicken, turkey, duck or goose), an inoculum induces antibodies that immunoreact with the genetically linked or conjugated (pendently-linked) hapten. Those antibodies also preferably bind to the protein or saccharide of the B cell immunogen.

[0358] The amount of recombinant HBc chimer immunogen utilized in each immunization is referred to as an immunogenically effective amount and can vary widely, depending inter alia, upon the recombinant HBc chimer immunogen, patient immunized, and the presence of an adjuvant in the vaccine, as discussed below. Immunogenically effective amounts for a vaccine and an inoculum provide the protection or antibody activity, respectively, discussed hereinbefore.

[0359] Vaccines or inocula typically contain a recombinant HBc chimer immunogen concentration of about 1 microgram to about 1 milligram per inoculation (unit dose), and preferably about 10 micrograms to about 50 micrograms per unit dose. The term “unit dose” as it pertains to a vaccine or inoculum of the present invention refers to physically discrete units suitable as unitary dosages for animals, each unit containing a predetermined quantity of active material calculated to individually or collectively produce the desired immunogenic effect in association with the required diluent; i.e., carrier, or vehicle.

[0360] Vaccines or inocula are typically prepared from a recovered recombinant HBc chimer immunogen by dispersing the immunogen, preferably in particulate form, in a physiologically tolerable (acceptable) diluent vehicle such as water, saline, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), acetate-buffered saline (ABS), Ringer's solution, or the like to form an aqueous composition. The diluent vehicle can also include oleaginous materials such as peanut oil, squalane, or squalene as is discussed hereinafter.

[0361] The preparation of inocula and vaccines that contain proteinaceous materials as active ingredients is also well understood in the art. Typically, such inocula or vaccines are prepared as parenterals, either as liquid solutions or suspensions; solid forms suitable for solution in, or suspension in, liquid prior to injection can also be prepared. The preparation can also be emulsified, which is particularly preferred.

[0362] The immunogenically active ingredient is often mixed with excipients that are pharmaceutically acceptable and compatible with the active ingredient. Suitable excipients are, for example, water, saline, dextrose, glycerol, ethanol, or the like and combinations thereof. In addition, if desired, an inoculum or vaccine can contain minor amounts of auxiliary substances such as wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering agents that enhance the immunogenic effectiveness of the composition.

[0363] A contemplated vaccine or inoculum advantageously also includes an adjuvant. Suitable adjuvants for vaccines and inocula of the present invention comprise those adjuvants that are capable of enhancing the antibody responses against B cell epitopes of the chimer, as well as adjuvants capable of enhancing cell mediated responses towards T cell epitopes contained in the chimer. Adjuvants are well known in the art (see, for example, Vaccine Design—The Subunit and Adjuvant Approach, 1995, Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Volume 6, Eds. Powell, M. F., and Newman, M. J., Plenum Press, New York and London, ISBN 0-306-44867-X).

[0364] Exemplary adjuvants include complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) that is not used in humans, incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA), squalene, squalane and alum [e.g., Alhydrogel™ (Superfos, Denmark)], which are materials well known in the art, and are available commercially from several sources.

[0365] Preferred adjuvants for use with immunogens of the present invention include aluminum or calcium salts (for example hydroxide or phosphate salts). A particularly preferred adjuvant for use herein is an aluminum hydroxide gel such as Alhydrogel™. For aluminum hydroxide gels, the chimer protein is admixed with the adjuvant so that about 50 to about 800 micrograms of aluminum are present per dose, and preferably about 400 to about 600 micrograms are present. Another particularly preferred adjuvant is aluminum phosphate that is available under trademark Adju-Phos™ from Superfos Biosector, Denmark. Primary aluminum phosphate particles have a plate-like morphology and a diameter of about 50 to about 100 nm, with the final particle size in the product being about 0.5 to about 10μ. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles (CAP) are an adjuvant being developed by Biosante, Inc (Lincolnshire, Ill.). The immunogen of interest can be either coated to the outside of particles, or encapsulated inside on the inside ([He et al., (November 2000) Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol., 7(6):899-903].

[0366] Another particularly preferred adjuvant for use with an immunogen of the present invention is an emulsion. A contemplated emulsion can be an oil-in-water emulsion or a water-in-oil emulsion. In addition to the immunogenic chimer protein, such emulsions comprise an oil phase of squalene, squalane, peanut oil or the like as are well-known, and a dispersing agent. Non-ionic dispersing agents are preferred and such materials include mono- and di-C12-C24-fatty acid esters of sorbitan and mannide such as sorbitan mono-stearate, sorbitan mono-oleate and mannide mono-oleate. An immunogen-containing emulsion is administered as an emulsion.

[0367] Preferably, such emulsions are water-in-oil emulsions that comprise squalene and mannide mono-oleate (ArlacelTmA), optionally with squalane, emulsified with the chimer protein in an aqueous phase. Well-known examples of such emulsions include Montanide™ ISA-720, and Montanide™ ISA 703 (Seppic, Castres, France), each of which is understood to contain both squalene and squalane, with squalene predominating in each, but to a lesser extent in Montanide™ ISA 703. Most preferably, Montanide™ ISA-720 is used, and a ratio of oil-to-water of 7:3 (w/w) is used. Other preferred oil-in-water emulsion adjuvants include those disclosed in WO 95/17210 and EP 0 399 843.

[0368] The use of small molecule adjuvants is also contemplated herein. One type of small molecule adjuvant useful herein is a 7-substituted-8-oxo- or 8-sulfo-guanosine derivative described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,539,205, No. 4,643,992, No. 5,011,828 and No. 5,093,318, whose disclosures are incorporated by reference. Of these materials, 7-allyl-8-oxoguanosine (loxoribine) is particularly preferred. That molecule has been shown to be particularly effective in inducing an antigen-(immunogen-) specific response.

[0369] A preferred useful adjuvant includes monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), 3-deacyl monophosphoryl lipid A (3D-MPL), a well-known adjuvant manufactured by Ribi Immunochem, Hamilton, Mont. The adjuvant contains three components extracted from bacteria: monophosphoryl lipid (MPL) A, trehalose dimycolate (TDM) and cell wall skeleton (CWS) (MPL+TDM+CWS) in a 2% squalene/Tween® 80 emulsion. This adjuvant can be prepared by the methods taught in GB 2122204B. A preferred form of 3-de-O-acylated monophosphoryl lipid A is in the form of an emulsion having a small particle size less than 0.2 μm in diameter (EP 0 689 454 B1). Most preferred are synthetic monosaccharide analogues of MPL called aminoalkyl glucosamide 4-phosphates (AGPs) such as sold under the designation RC-529 {2-[(R)-3-tetradecanoyloxy-tetradecanoyl-amino]-ethyl-2-deoxy-4-O-phosphono-3-O-[(R)-3-tetradecanoyl-oxytetradecanoyl]-2-[(R)-3-tetra-decanoyloxytetra-decanoylamino]-p-D-glucopyranoside triethylammonium salt}. RC-529 is available in a squalene emulsion sold as RC-529SE and in an aqueous formulation as RC-529AF available from Corixa Corp. (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,987,237 and No. 6,113,918). These adjuvants can be used alone or in combination with one or more other adjuvants such as Alhydrogel™.

[0370] Further contemplated adjuvants include synthetic oligonucleotide adjuvants containing the CpG nucleotide motif one or more times (plus flanking sequences) available from Coley Pharmaceutical Group. The adjuvant designated QS21, available from Aquila Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., is an immunologically active saponin fractions having adjuvant activity derived from the bark of the South American tree Quillaja Saponaria Molina (e.g. Quil™ A), and the method of its production is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,540; semi-syntheic and synthetic derivatives of Quillaja Saponaria Molina saponins are also useful, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,977,081 and No. 6,080,725. The adjuvant denominated MF59 available from Chiron Corp. is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,709,879 and No. 6,086,901.

[0371] Muramyl dipeptide adjuvants are also contemplated and include N-acetyl-muramyl-L-threonyl-D-isoglutamine (thur-MDP), N-acetyl-nor-muramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine [CGP 11637, referred to as nor-MDP], and N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutaminyl-L-alanine-2-(1′-2′-dipalmityol-sn-glycero-3-hydroxyphosphoryloxy)ethylamine [(CGP) 1983A, referred to as MTP-PE]. The so-called muramyl dipeptide analogues are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,767,842.

[0372] Preferred adjuvant mixtures include combinations of 3D-MPL and QS21 (EP 0 671 948 B1), oil-in-water emulsions comprising 3D-MPL and QS21 (WO 95/17210, PCT/EP98/05714), 3D-MPL formulated with other carriers (EP 0 689 454 B1), QS21 formulated in cholesterol-containing liposomes (WO 96/33739), or immunostimulatory oligonucleotides (WO 96/02555). SBAS2 (now ASO2) available from SKB (now Glaxo-SmithKline) contains QS21 and MPL in an oil-in-water emulsion. Alternative adjuvants include those described in WO 99/52549 and non-particulate suspensions of polyoxyethylene ether (UK Patent Application No. 9807805.8).

[0373] Adjuvants are utilized in an adjuvant amount, which can vary with the adjuvant, mammal and recombinant HBc chimer immunogen. Typical amounts can vary from about 1 μg to about 1 mg per immunization. Those skilled in the art know that appropriate concentrations or amounts can be readily determined.

[0374] Inocula and vaccines are conventionally administered parenterally, by injection, for example, either subcutaneously or intramuscularly. Additional formulations that are suitable for other modes of administration include suppositories and, in some cases, oral formulation. The use of a nasal spray for inoculation is also contemplated as discussed in Neirynck et al. (1999) Nature Med., 5(10):1157-1163. For suppositories, traditional binders and carriers can include, for example, polyalkalene glycols or triglycerides; such suppositories may be formed from mixtures containing the active ingredient in the range of 0.5% to 10%, preferably 1-2%. Oral formulations include such normally employed excipients as, for example, pharmaceutical grades of mannitol, lactose, starch, magnesium stearate, sodium saccharine, cellulose, magnesium carbonate and the like.

[0375] An inoculum or vaccine composition takes the form of a solution, suspension, tablet, pill, capsule, sustained release formulation or powder, and contains an immunogenically effective amount of HBc chimer or HBc chimer conjugate, preferably as particles, as the active ingredient. In a typical composition, an immunogenically effective amount of preferred HBc chimer or HBc chimer conjugate particles is about 1 μg to about 1 mg of active ingredient per dose, and more preferably about 5 μg to about 50 μg per dose, as noted before.

[0376] A vaccine is typically formulated for parenteral administration. Exemplary immunizations are carried out sub-cutaneously (SC) intra-muscularly (IM), intravenously (IV), intraperitoneally (IP) or intra-dermally (ID). However, oral and nasal routes of vaccination are also contemplated.

[0377] The HBc chimer particles and HBc chimer particle conjugates can be formulated into the vaccine as neutral or salt forms. Pharmaceutically acceptable salts, include the acid addition salts (formed with the free amino groups of the protein or hapten) and are formed with inorganic acids such as, for example, hydrochloric or phosphoric acids, or such organic acids as acetic, oxalic, tartaric, mandelic, and the like. Salts formed with the free carboxyl groups can also be derived form inorganic bases such as, for example, sodium, potassium, ammonium, calcium, or ferric hydroxides, and such organic bases as isopropylamine, trimethylamine, 2-ethylamino ethanol, histidine, procaine, and the like.

[0378] In yet another embodiment, a vaccine or inoculum is contemplated in which a gene encoding a contemplated HBc chimer is transfected into suitably attenuated enteric bacteria such as S. typhi, S. typhimurium, S. typhimurium-E. coli hybrids or E. coli. Exemplary attenuated or avirulent S. typhi and S. typhimurium and S. typhimurium-E. coli hybrids are discussed in the citations provided before. These vaccines and inocula are particularly contemplated for use against diseases that infect or are transmitted via mucosa of the nose, the gut and reproductive tract such as influenza, yeasts such as Aspergiullus and Candida, viruses such as polio, foot-and-mouth disease, hepatitis A, and bacteria such as Cholera, Salmonella and E. coli and where a mucosal IgA response is desired in addition to or instead of an IgG systemic response.

[0379] The enteric bacteria can be freeze dried, mixed with dry pharmaceutically acceptable diluents, made into tablets or capsules for ingestion and administered to or taken by the host animal as are usual solid phase medications. In addition, aqueous preparations of these bacterial vaccines are adapted for use in mucosal immunization as by oral, nasal, rectal or vaginal administration.

[0380] Oral immunization using plant matter containing contemplated chimeric molecule particles can be achieved by simple ingestion of the transgenic plant tissue such as a root, like a carrot, or seed, such as rice or corn. In this case, the water of the mouth or gastrointestinal tract provides the usually used aqueous medium used for immunization and the surrounding plant tissue provides the pharmaceutically acceptable diluent.

[0381] The inocula or vaccines are administered in a manner compatible with the dosage formulation, and in such amounts as are therapeutically effective and immunogenic. The quantity to be administered depends on the subject to be treated, capacity of the subject's immune system to synthesize antibodies, and degree of protection desired. Precise amounts of active ingredient required to be administered depend on the judgment of the practitioner and are peculiar to each individual. However, suitable dosage ranges are of the order of tens of micrograms active ingredient per individual. Suitable regimes for initial administration and booster shots are also variable, but are typified by an initial administration followed in intervals (weeks or months) by a subsequent injection or other administration.

[0382] Once immunized, the mammal is maintained for a period of time sufficient for the recombinant HBc chimer immunogen to induce the production of a sufficient titer of antibodies that bind to an antigen of interest such as a sporozoite for a malarial vaccine. The maintenance time for the production of illustrative anti-sporozoite antibodies typically lasts for a period of about three to about twelve weeks, and can include a booster, or second immunizing administration of the vaccine. A third immunization is also contemplated, if desired, at a time 24 weeks to five years after the first immunization. It is particularly contemplated that once a protective level titer of antibodies is attained, the vaccinated mammal is preferably maintained at or near that antibody titer by periodic booster immunizations administered at intervals of about 1 to about 5 years.

[0383] The production of anti-sporozoite, in the case of a malaria vaccine, or other antibodies is readily ascertained by obtaining a plasma or serum sample from the immunized mammal and assaying the antibodies therein for their ability to bind to an appropriate antigen such as a synthetic circumsporozoite immunodominant antigen [e.g. the P. falciparum CS protein peptide (NANP)5 used herein] in an ELISA assay as described hereinafter or by another immunoassay such as a Western blot, as is well known in the art.

[0384] It is noted that the induced antibodies such as anti-CS antibodies or anti-influenza antibodies can be isolated from the blood of an inoculated host mammal using well known techniques, and then reconstituted into a second vaccine for passive immunization as is also well known. Similar techniques are used for gamma-globulin immunizations of humans. For example, antiserum from one or a number of immunized hosts can be precipitated in aqueous ammonium sulfate (typically at 40-50 percent of saturation), and the precipitated antibodies purified chromatographically as by use of affinity chromatography in which (NANP)5 or an influenza M2 polypeptide is utilized as the antigen immobilized on the chromatographic column. Thus, for example, an inoculum can be used in a horse or sheep to induce antibody production against a malarial species for use in a passive immunization in yet another animal such as humans.

[0385] Another embodiment of the invention is a process for inducing antibodies, activated T cells or both in an animal host comprising the steps of inoculating said animal host with an inoculum. The inoculum used in the process comprises an immunogenic amount of a before-described HBc chimer particle or HBc chimer particle conjugate dissolved or dispersed in a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent. The animal host is maintained for a time sufficient for antibodies or activated T cells to be induced, as can be assayed by well-known techniques, which typically requires a time period of weeks to months, as is again well-known. A plurality of such immunizations is contemplated during this maintenance period.

[0386] Computer Modeling to Predict Disulfide Bonds

[0387] Disulfide bond predictions were made using the program SS-BOND [Hazes et al., Protein Eng 2, 119-25 (1988)], which requires three-dimensional structure information about the protein of interest. The HBc structure coordinates were uploaded from the Protein Data Bank (this is the 3.3 Å structure solved by Wynne et al.), and coordinates for the last three monomers were deleted, as this structure includes information for two dimers.

[0388] When run on a standard personal computer, the program automatically selects the most stringent requirements for the three parameters taken into account when predicting disulfide bonds: (1) the χ-3 angle, which is the rotation about the Sy-Sy bond (ideal is ±90° and the deviation from this angle is set at 0°), (2) the maximal energy required to allow bond formation (ideal is less than 10 kcal/mol), and (3) the energy difference allowed above the lowest possible energy conformation for a given bond (maximum recommended is 5 kcal/mol). To obtain any hits for disulfide bond formation between immunodominant loop helix (ILH) 1 (amino acids 50-73) and ILH2 (amino acids 79-110), however, these requirements had to be relaxed. If running the program from a Linux operating system, these parameters can be edited.

[0389] Relaxation of the two latter parameters yielded no additional hits. Relaxation of the X-3 angle, however, yielded five possible chimers when allowed 30° of rotation about the bond (Table). No additional hits were obtained between 29° and 72°, where maximum allowed deviation is 90°; this hit was, therefore, not included in the study. Side chain positions of the thus prepared outputs were then examined using the program GRASP [Nicholls et al., Proteins 30, 9686-97 (1991)] for visual examination of proximity of amino acids. All, except the 720 hit, appeared to be spatially proximal and these chimers were, therefore, cloned. The hit obtained at 29°, although not in either of the ILHs, was also included, as these residues are in the actual immunodominant loop. Epitope insertions were made between amino acids D78 and P79 so bridging would occur at the base of the epitope.

8SS-BOND Hits Bridging the Two MajorHBc immunodominant Helicesχ-3 deviationILH1 aminoILH2 amino(maximum 90°)acid (50-73)acid (79-110) 4°L55H104 6°A58L10017°A69V8924°W62F9729°L76*R82*72°V72V85*located in the immunodominant loop, rather than the immunodominant helices

[0390] The invention is illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLE 1

Construction of Chimers Harboring Cysteine Mutations

[0391] A. Plasmid Vector pKK223-3N, and Cysteine Substitutions

[0392] Zheng et al., J Biol Chem 267, 9422-9429 (1992) found that two of the four cysteines present in the HBc183 monomer sequence were not involved in disulfide bonding. Cysteine 48 was found to be partially covalently bound in a given sample and cysteine 107 was found to exist as a free thiol. Mutation of these cysteines was not found to affect particle assmbly or stability and no sulfhydryl reactivity was detected, providing conclusive evidence that cysteine 61 and cysteine 183 are completely sulfide bonded.

[0393] Cysteine residues C48 and C107 were both mutated to serine residues to easily quantify sulfhydryl content of particles containing introduced cysteines. This is a conservative mutation, as serine is the amino acid most chemically similar to cysteine—they are identical, with the exception of a sulfhydryl, versus a hydroxyl R group. This chimer was used as a template for all subsequent chimers. Two versions of the template were made, one terminating at V149 [HBc149(C48S/C107S)], and the other harboring the additional cysteine at the C-terminus [HBc149(C48S/C107S)+C].

[0394] The HBc gene was originally cloned into the pKK223-3 vector available from Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, N.J.). The multi-cloning site was modified to include an NcoI site using PCR. All PCR reactions were performed using the Minicycler™ available from MJ Research (Waltham, Mass.). PCR reaction conditions for all studies were as follows:

[0395] Step 1—94° C. for 3 minutes

[0396] Step 2—92° C. for 1 minute

[0397] Step 3—50° C. for 1 minute

[0398] Step 4—72° C. for 40 seconds

[0399] Step 5—14 times to Step 2

[0400] Step 6—72° C. for 5 minutes

[0401] Step 7—4° C. for 10 minutes

[0402] Step 8—End

[0403] All oligonucleotide PCR primers were synthesized by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.) and used at a concentration of 1 μM, whereas approximately 0.1 μg of the requisite template was used in each reaction. Vent polymerase (New England BioLabs, Beverly, Mass.) was the amplification enzyme and no additional magnesium chloride was found to be necessary in any reaction. All primers referenced are listed in Table 2, hereinafter, and all restriction enzymes were purchased from New England BioLabs.

[0404] The DNA sequence of each chimer was verified by automated DNA sequencing outsourced to Sequi-Net (Fort Collins, Colo.). Plasmid stocks were created using the Qiagen (Valencia, Calif.) Midi Kit for plasmid isolation. Complete gene nucleotide sequences of all chimers made using PCR are provided in the sequence listing.

[0405] Primer sequences are shown in Table 2, below, and in which HBc amino acid residues are shown above the nucleotide sequence for forward primers and below for reverse primers. Bold italic amino acid residues and bases indicate substitutions. Restriction sites of interest are in bold. All sequences are written 5′ to 3′.

9TABLE 2PrimerSEQ#nameSequenceID NO1pKK-SphI-FGGT GCA TGC AAG GAG ATG2402pkk-Nco-GCG AAG CTT CGG ATC CCA TGG TTT TTT CCT CCT TAT241Hind-RGTG AAA TTG TTA TCC GCT C3NcoI-F M D I D P Y411TTGGGCC ATG GAC ATC GAC CCT TA2424HindIII-RCGCAAGC TTA AAC AAC AGT AGT CTC CGG AAG243 # V V T T E P L4125Earl GT TTC TCT TCC AAA AGT GAG GCT AGA AAT GTG AAA244(C107S)-R T E R G F T L S I H F413CCA CAA GAW L L6Earl-FL T F G R E T414CTC ACT TTT GGA AGA GAA AC2457C48S-GAG GC AGT ATG GTG AGG TGA GCT ATG CTC AGG AGA CTC246HhaI-RL A T H H P S H E P S E4158A54- A L R Q A I L416HhaI-FGAG GCG CTC AGG CAA GCA ATT CTT T2479C-HindIII-CGCAAGCTTA CTA GCA AAC AAC AGT AGT CTC GGA A248R # C V V T T E P41710Earl-GCGC TCT TCC AAA AGT GAG GCT AGA AAT GCA AAA CCA249H104C-R R G F T L S I C F W418CAA GAG TTG CCTL L Q R11Sau96I-GCGG GCC CAT ATT AGT GTT GCA ATA ACT GAC TAC250V89C-R G M N T N Y S V V419TAG GTC TCL D12Cac8I-GCG CTC GCC CCA GCA AAG AAT TGC TTG CT CA GC251L55C-R E G W C L I A Q R A420AGT ATG GTG AGG TT H H P13Cac8I-FW G E L M T L A T421 GG GGGAG CTA ATG ACT CTA GCT ACC T14Cac8I-GCGG CTC GCC CCA GCA AAG AAT GCA TTG CCT GAG253A58C-R E G W C L I Q R L422

GC AGT ATG

A T H15Sau96I-RT TAG GCC CAT ATT AGT GTT G254 L G M N T N42316Sau96I- G L K F R Q L W F424L100C-FGCGG GGC CTA AAG TTC AGG CAA TGC TTG TGG TTT255H I SCAC ATT TCT 17BstNI-GCG CCA GGT GCA TAG AGT CAT TAG TTC CCC C256A69C-R W T L T M L E G42518BstNI-FA T W V G V426 CT ACC TGG GTG GGT GTT25719Sau96I-F M G L K F R427T ATG GGC CTA AAG TTC AGG25820Cac8I-GCGG

CCGCA GCA AAG AAT TGC TTG CT GAG CGC

259W62C-R E G C C L I A Q R L A428AGT ATG GTG AGGT H H P21Sau96I- G L K R Q L L W F429F97C-FGCGG GGC CTA AAG TGC AGG CAA CTC TTG TGG TT26022NheI-GCG

TGG ATC TTC GCA ATT AAC AC

261L76C-R S A P D E N V G43023NheI- A S D L V V S431R82C-FGCG

TGC GAC CTA GTA GTC AGT T

262

[0406] Chimers HBc149 and HBc149+C

[0407] The vector, pKK223-3 (FIG. 2), was amplified with primers 1 and 2. The PCR product and the parent vector were then digested with SphI and HindIII and purified from a 1.25% agarose gel (gel apparatus from Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) using the QIAEX II gel extraction system from Qiagen. (Note that all cloning was performed using these apparatuses and reagents). When digested, a fragment of 480 base pairs is cut from the parent vector—this fragment is discarded and the vector is ligated with the PCR product of 458 base pairs. This clone (pKK223-3N, FIG. 2) is now capable of accepting inserts flanked by NcoI and HindIII sites. The result of this modification to the pKK223-3 vector is that all restriction sites in the multi-cloning site have been deleted—only the NcoI-EcoRI-HindIII sequence from primer 2 remains between the tac promoter and the 5S rRNA region.

[0408] The HBV ayw subtype genome (sequence available from NCBI) was used to clone the HBc gene. Primers 3 and 4 were used to add flanking NcoI and HindIII sites, along with a stop codon following amino acid 149. The pKK223-3N vector and the PCR product were then digested with NcoI and HindIII. The 12 base pair fragment liberated from the vector was discarded. The vector was ligated with the roughly 450 base pair PCR fragment to yield the chimer HBc149. HBc149+C (CV-1123) was made the same way, except reverse primer 9 (SEQ ID NO:248) was used to insert a cysteine between valine 149 and the stop codon.

[0409] Chimers HBc149(C48S/C107S) and HBc149(C48S/C107S)+C

[0410] To make these two chimers containing cysteine to serine mutations at positions 48 and 107 (C48S/C107S), several PCR reactions were necessary. The C107S mutation was made first, utilizing an endogenous EarI site. The 5′ piece was produced using primer 3 and primer 5, which introduced the C107S mutation. The 3′ piece was prepared using perfect match primers 6 and 4. These fragments (approximately 320 and 130 base pairs, respectively) were digested with EarI and ligated.

[0411] This ligation was then used as a template to introduce the C48S mutation. An HhaI site was introduced as a silent mutation into A54 to enable this mutation. Again, the PCR was done in two halves. The 5′ piece introduced the C48S mutation using primers 3 and 7, whereas the 3′ piece was made using primers 8 and 4. These products (about 165 and 295 base pairs, respectively) were then digested with HhaI and ligated. The ligation product was then amplified with primer 3 and either primer 4, which placed the stop codon after V149, or primer 9, which added a cysteine after V149 and then added the stop codon. Products, approximately 450 base pairs, were digested with NcoI and HindIII and ligated into the pKK223-3N vector prepared as above to yield the chimers HBc149(C48S/C107S) and HBc149(C48S/C107S)+C.

[0412] Construction of the panel of four of the five disulfide chimers was done in a similar manner to the C48S/C107S chimers—the first mutation was introduced by the PCR of two halves, then the second was introduced in two halves, using the first ligation as a template. All disulfide chimers were made with a C-terminal cysteine and all original PCRs were done using HBc149(C48S/C107S)+C as the template.

[0413] Chimer HBc149(C48S/C107S)L55C/H104C+C

[0414] A silent Cac8I site was introduced around residue E64 of HBc to make the L55C mutation. Primers 3 and 12 were used to amplify the 5′ half and primers 13 and 9 were used to amplify the 3′ half. These PCR products were then digested with Cac8I and ligated. The ligation was then amplified in two halves. The 5′ half, made using primers 3 and 10, introduced the H104C mutation and maintained the C107S mutation in the template, using the EarI site used previously in the construction of the C48S/C107S chimers. The 3′ half used perfect match primers 6 and 9. After digestion with EarI, fragments were ligated and re-amplified with primers 3 and 9. This product was digested with NcoI and HindIII and cloned into pKK223-3N prepared as above.

[0415] Chimer HBc149(C48S/C107S)A58C/L100C+C

[0416] The 5′ half introducing the A58C mutation was made the same way as the L55C mutation above, using the introduced Cac8I site. Primers 3 and 14 were used to make the A58C mutation, whereas the same 3′ PCR product made from primers 13 and 9 (see L55C/H104C above) was used in this ligation. To make the L100C mutation, however, an endogenous Sau96I site was utilized. The 5′ half was made using perfect match primers 3 and 15, whereas the L100C mutation was introduced in the 3′ half using primers 16 and 9. PCR products were digested with Sau96I and ligated, then re-amplified with primers 3 and 9 and cloned into pKK223-3N, as above.

[0417] Chimer HBc149(C48S/C107S)A69C/V89C+C

[0418] The A69C mutation was introduced in the 5′ PCR using primers 3 and 17 and an endogenous BstNI site. The 3′ PCR used perfect match primers 18 and 9. Products were digested with BstNI and ligated. The ligation was then used to create the V89C mutation in the 5′ PCR half, which again utilized the Sau96I site occurring naturally in the gene (primers 3 and 11). The 3′ PCR does not introduce any mutations with perfect match primers 19 and 9. Products were digested Sau96I, ligated, re-amplified with primers 3 and 9, and cloned into pKK223-3, as above.

[0419] Chimer HBc149(C48S/C107S)W62C/F97C+C

[0420] As with L55C and A58C, the W62C mutation was made from the Cac8I site. Primers 3 and 20 introduced the mutation in the 5′ half, whereas the same 3′ PCR product used to make the L55C and A58C mutations was used here. Products were digested with Cac8I, ligated and subjected to a second round of PCR. The Sau96I site was again utilized to make the 3′F97C mutation using primers 21 and 9, whereas the 5′ primers 3 and 15 were perfect match. It is noted that the PCRs involved in making this chimer must be done in this order, as an additional Cac8I site is introduced when making the F97C mutation. After digestion with Sau96I, the products were ligated, re-amplified with primers 3 and 9, and cloned into pKK223-3, as above.

[0421] Chimer HBc149(C48S/C107S)L76C/R82C+C

[0422] Making silent mutations in the A80-S81 sequence in the HBc loop made it possible to introduce an NheI site into the loop and make this chimer in only two rounds of PCR. The 5′ piece introduced the L76C mutation using primers 3 and 22, and the 3′ piece introduced the R82C mutation using primers 23 and 9. PCR products, roughly 245 and 222 base pairs, respectively, were digested with NheI and ligated. The ligation was then amplified using primers 3 and 9 to yield the standard 450 base pair fragment that was digested with NcoI and HindIII, and cloned in to pKK223-3N.

[0423] B. Preparation of Loop Insertion Vectors

[0424] Four of the five cysteine-harboring engineered chimers successfully assembled into HBc particles. All of these were, therefore, assayed for their abilities to accept foreign epitopes into the immunodominant loop. Additionally, the chimer lacking any introduced cysteines was used as a control with which to compare abilities to assemble, and, later, stabilize. Epitopes were inserted between HBc amino acids aspartic acid 78 and proline 79. The novel restriction sites EcoRI and SacI were introduced so that all epitopes were flanked by Gly and Ile on the 5′ end (encoded by the EcoRI restriction site) and Glu and Leu on the 3′ end (encoded by the SacI restriction site). All cysteine chimers, except HBc149(C48S/C107S)L55C/H104C+C, which failed to form an assembled particle, were therefore first made into vectors able to accept heterologous epitopes between amino acid residues D78 and P79 of the HBc sequence.

[0425] Modified HBc149 (V2 and V16) or HBc183 (V8) genes, able to accept the directional insertion of synthetic dsDNA fragments into the immunodominant loop region, were constructed using PCR. (The plasmid accepting inserts between D78 and P79 and truncated to V149 was named V2, the same plasmid with an additional cysteine following V149 was named V16, and the plasmid accepting inserts between D78 and P79 and terminating at C183, was called V8). The HBc149 and HBc183 genes were amplified in two halves using two PCR primer pairs, one of which amplifies the amino terminus, the other amplifies the carboxyl terminus. For V2, the products of the PCR reactions are a 249 bp (N-terminus) and a 243 bp fragment (C-terminus); for V16, the products are a 249 bp (N-terminus) and a 246 bp fragment (C-terminus; for V8, the products are a 249 bp (N-terminus) and a 349 bp fragment (C-terminus).

[0426] The N-terminal fragments prepared were digested with NcoI and EcoRI, and the C-terminal fragments were digested with EcoRI and HindIII. The V2, V16, and V8 fragment pairs were then ligated together at the common EcoRI overhangs. The resultant NcoI-HindIII fragments were then ligated into the pKK223-3N vector, which had been prepared by digestion with NcoI and HindIII.

[0427] To insert B cell epitopes into the V2, V16, and V8 plasmids, the appropriate plasmid was digested with EcoRI and SacI restriction enzymes. Synthetic dsDNA fragments containing 5′ EcoRI and 3′ SacI overhangs were then inserted. In all cases, V2, V16, and V8, glycine-isoleucine (EcoRI) and glutamic acid-leucine (SacI) amino acid pairs, flank the inserted B cell epitopes. The inserted restriction sites are underlined in the primers below.

10V2HBc149/NcoI-F5′-TTGGGCCATGGACATCGACCCTTASEQ ID NO:263HBc-D78/EcoRI-R5′-GCGGAATTCCATCTTCCAAATTAACACCCACSEQ ID NO:264HBc-P79/EcoRI-Sad-F5′-CGCGAATTCAAAAAGAGCTCCCAGCGTCTAGAGACCTAGSEQ ID NO:265HBc149/HindIII-R5′-CGCAAGCTTAAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGGAAGSEQ ID NO: 266V16HBc149/NcoI-F5′-TTGGGCCATGGACATCGACCCTTASEQ ID NO:263HBc-D78/ECoRI-R5′-GCGGAATTCCATCTTCCAAATTAACACCCACSEQ ID NO:264HBc-P79/EcoRI-SacI-F5′-CGCGAATTCAAAAAGAGCTCCCAGCGTCTAGAGACCTAGSEQ ID NO:265HBc149+C/HindIII-R5′-CGCAAGCTTACTAGCAAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGGAAGSEQ ID NO:267V8HBc149/NcoI-F5′-GGGCCATGGACATCGACCCTTASEQ ID NO:263HBc-D78/EcoRI-R5′-GCGGAATTCCATCTTCCAAATTAACACCCACSEQ ID NO:264HBc-P79/EcoRI-SacI-F5′-CGCGAATTCAAAAAGAGCTCCCAGCGTCTAGAGACCTAGSEQ ID NO:265HBc183/HindIII-R5′-GGAAAGCTTACTAACATTGAGATTCCCGSEQ ID NO:268

[0428] Due to the proximity of the cysteine mutations to the loop, it was necessary to design a set of primers specifically for chimer HBc149(C48S/C107S)L76C/R82C+C, whereas all other chimers used the same sets of primers (Table 2 and Table 3, hereinafter). The 5′ halves were made using primers 3 and 22 (23 in the case of HBc149(C48S/C107S)L76C/R82C+C), by adding an EcoRI site to the 3′ end. The 3′ halves were made using primers 24 (25 in the case of HBc149(C48S/C107S)-L76C/R82C+C) and 9, which added EcoRI sites and downstream SacI sites to these fragments. All PCR products were then digested with EcoRI, ligated with each corresponding half, and re-amplified with primers 3 and 9. These products were then digested with NcoI and HindIII and cloned into prepared plasmid pKK223-3N. The sequence of each clone was verified by automated DNA sequencing, as described before.

[0429] Epitope selection was based on past success or failure of an epitope in an equivalent vector that had no introduced cysteines (V16). Two epitopes that failed in V16 were selected—one from the β-amyloid protein (residues 1-32) implicated in Alzheimer's disease [Morgan et al., Nature 408, 982-985 (2000)], and residues 701-721 of the protective antigen from B. anthracis (Ba) [Little et al., Microbiology 142, 707-715 (1996)]. An epitope from the hookworm protein Asp-1 (residues 292-303) (provided by Dr. Peter Hotez, George Washington University) had yielded low, but detectable particle assembly in V16; this epitope was included to assess whether particle yields could be increased with the introduced disulfide bonds. A final epitope, which exhibited very good particle assembly in V16, was included in order to compare particle assembly and stability of this chimer to the engineered versions. That epitope is derived from the extracellular domain of the M2 protein of influenza A (residues 2-24) [Zebedee et al., J Virol 62, 2762-2772 (1988); and Neirynck et al., Nat Med 5, 1157-63 (1999)] with two modifications in the sequence that were found to be necessary for particle assembly in previous work with this epitope in our laboratory. All epitope sequences are given in Table 3, below.

[0430] Oligonucleotide sequences were designed as a top strand and a bottom strand that, when annealed, harbor single-stranded sticky ends that can be ligated into the cysteine-engineered vectors prepared above. Oligo annealing was performed using a Minicycler (MJ Research) by adding equimolar amounts of oligo (10 μM of each top and bottom oligo) and heating at 95° C. for 5 minutes, then decreasing the temperature by 10 every minute for 750. Annealed oligo-containing solution was then diluted 1:20 in TE buffer. This procedure was performed for the primer pairs 26 and 27, 28 and 29, 30 and 31, and 32 and 33. Each disulfide vector was prepared by digestion with EcoRI and SacI, followed by purifying the vector away from the small resultant fragment. One μL of each annealed oligo was then ligated into the prepared vector. Clone sequences were, again, verified by sequencing.

11TABLE 3SEQ#Primer nameSequenceID NO22EcoRI-G CGG AAT TCC ATC TTC CAA ATT AAC ACC CAC269D78-R I G D E L N V G V43223EcoRI-D78G CGG AAT TCC ATC TTC GCA ATT AAC ACC CA270(L76C)-R I G D E C N V G V43324EcoRi/SacI- G I Q K E L P A S R434P79-FCG GGA ATT CAA AAA GAG CTC CCA GCG TCT AGA271D LGAC CTA G25EcoRI/SacI- G I Q K E L P A S C435P79(R82C)-FGC GGA ATT CAA AAA GAG CTC CCA GCT AGC TGC272D LGAC CT I L D A E F R H D S G43626β-Am(1-32)-TA ATT CTG GAT GCG GAA TTT CGT CAT GAC AGC GGC27327β-Am(1-32)- TAA GAC CTA CGC CTT AAA GCA GTA CTG TCG CCGB (3′)Y E V H H Q K L V F F A(continued-T)TAT GAG GTG CAC CAT CAG AAA CTG GTT TTC TTT GCC(continued-B)ATA CTC CAC GTG GTA GTC TTT GAC CAA AAG AAA CGG(continued-T)E D V G S N K G A I I E L(continued-B)GAA GAT GTC GGT TCT AAC AAG GGG GCA ATT ATC GAG CTCTT CTA CAG CCA AGA TTG TTC CCC CGT TAA TAG C I V T K E N T I I N P43728Ba(701-721)-TA ATT GTC ACG AAA GAA AAT ACT ATA ATT AAC CCT27429Ba(701-721)- CAG TGC TTT CTT TTA TGA TAT TAA TTG GGAB (3′)S E N G D T S T N G I E L(continued-T)TCT GAG AAT GGT GAC ACC TCC ACG AAC GGG ATC GAG CT(continued-B)AGA CTC TTA CCA CTG TGG AGG TGC TTG CCC TAG C I V Y Q H S H G E D R P43830Asp-1(292-303)-TA ATT GTT TAT CAG CAT TCT CAC GGC GAA GAT CGT CCA27531Asp-1(292-303)- CAA ATA GTC GTA AGA GTG CCG CTT CTA GCA GGTB (3′)G E LGGT GAG CTCCA C I S L L T E V E T P I43932IA(M2)2C/2S-TA ATT TCT CTG TTA ACC GAA GTG GAG ACG CCG ATT27633IA(M2)2C/2S- AGA GAC AAT TGG CTT CAC CTC TGC GGC TAAB (3′)R N E W G S R S N D S(continued-T)CGT AAC GAA TGG GGT AGC CGC TCT AAT CAT AGC(continued-B)GCA TTG CTT ACC CCA TCG GCG AGA TTA CTA TCGS D E L(continued-T)TCT GAC GAG CT(continued-B)AGA CTG C

[0431] C. Expression and Purification of Chimers

[0432] After sequence verification, chimers were co-transformed with pREP4 (Qiagen), a plasmid expressing the lac repressor, into the BLR strain of E. coli (Novagen, Madison, Wis.). Cells were made competent by calcium chloride preparation (Sambrook et al., Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual—2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989). Plasmid pKK223-3 harbors the tac promoter, but does not encode the lac repressor, so this protein is provided in trans by pREP4 to repress expression of the HBc gene until it is induced by the addition of IPTG. Transformations are plated on LB plates supplemented with 50 μg/L ampicillin (pKK223-3 carries the ampicillin resistance marker), and 10 μg/L kanamycin (pREP4 carries the kanamycin resistance marker) to prevent loss of either plasmid.

[0433] Transformants were then picked into 3 mL starter cultures of TB Dry media (Doc Frugal, San Diego, Calif.) with the same concentrations of antibiotics and grown overnight. One mL of each starter culture was then used to inoculate 500 mL TB Dry media with same antibiotics and cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.6-1.0 and then induced with 25 μM IPTG. Cultures were grown 16-24 hours and the cells harvested by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 15,000×G.

[0434] Assembly of chimers was assayed using size exclusion chromatography. Assembled HBc elutes as a distinct peak (second in a profile of four peaks), which is absent when a particle fails to assemble-unassembled monomers elute in the later peaks. Cell pellets were resuspended in 50 mL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 and 10 mM EDTA (lysis buffer) by stirring. The cell suspension was then lysed using a microfluidizer (Microfluidics, Newton, Mass.) and centrifuged for 20 minutes at 31,000×G to pellet the cell debris. HBc particles are typically localized in the soluble fraction, so the volume of the supernatant was measured and then diluted 1:1 with saturated ammonium sulfate to precipitate the protein. The resulting solution was stirred gently at 4° C. for 15 minutes and then centrifuged a second time for 20 minutes at 31,000×G to pellet the ammonium sulfate precipitate.

[0435] The supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended in 5 mL of lysis buffer and then transferred to dialysis tubing (molecular weight cut off 8,000 daltons). Samples were dialyzed against 1L of lysis buffer for at least three hours, filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter, and then subjected to size exclusion chromatography using Sepharose CL-4B resin packed in a 2.5×100 cm XK 26 column and attached to an Akta Prime FPLC (all Pharmacia Biotech).

[0436] The column was pre-equilibrated with 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 and 0.02% sodium azide, and the same buffer was pumped through the column for approximately 800 mL at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/minute, while 6-8 mL fractions were collected. Particle production was assessed by examination of the elution profile for a characteristic peak following the initial narrow first peak of material traveling through the column.

[0437] If assembled particles were detected, the peak fractions were pooled and passed through a 20-25 mL column volume of coarse HYPATITE™ C resin (Clarkson, Williamsport, Pa.), packed in a 2.5×20 cm column (Kontes, Vineland, N.J.). HBc particles typically exhibit minimal binding to this resin, so the protein was loaded onto the column and the entire eluent collected. The column was then washed with 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 until the Abs280 of the eluent was less than 0.1.

[0438] The pool was then passed through a 0.45 μm filter and loaded through the solvent line of an HPLC (BioCad from PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, Mass.) onto a MonoQ™ HR 10/10 anion exchange column (Pharmacia Biotech). The column was equilibrated in 25 mM Tris-HCl and 0.02% sodium azide and, once the sample was loaded, washed with the same buffer. Particles were eluted with a linear gradient of 0-3 M NaCl in 25 mM Tris-HCl. Peak fractions were pooled, diluted 1:1 with saturated ammonium sulfate to re-precipitate, stirred gently at 4° C. for 1 hour, and then centrifuged for 30 minutes at 17,500×G. The resultant pellet was resuspended in a minimum volume of 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8, transferred to dialysis tubing, and dialyzed extensively against the same buffer. The final purified sample was then passed through a 0.45 μm filter and incubated (maintained) at 4° C. for 24 hours before it was frozen. Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay (available from Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.).

[0439] D. Characterization of Assembled Chimers

[0440] Purified proteins were characterized using two methods to examine particles in their native conformation (analytical size exclusion and Ellman's test), one that examined denatured particles under non-reducing conditions (non-reducing SDS-PAGE), and one that examined monomer integrity (reducing SDS-PAGE).

[0441] To assess particulate versus non-particulate material, purified protein samples were analyzed using analytical size exclusion chromatography. In that procedure, 50-90 μg of each sample were injected onto Superose 6 HR 10/30 columns (Pharmacia Biotech) and attached to either an HPLC (BioCad) or an Akta Purifier (Pharmacia Biotech). 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 was pumped through the column at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Particle integrity was assessed by visualization of peak elution profiles, where the presence of one peak at an elution position of approximately 7 mL is fully formed particle. Later peaks represent non-particulate structures, such as dimers and monomers.

[0442] Disulfide bond formation was assessed using a method similar to that described in Zheng et al., J Biol Chem 267, 9422-9429 (1992). Thus, particles were diluted to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 and 0.1% SDS in ELISA plate wells. A stock solution of Ellman's reagent (Sigma) was then made at a concentration of 200 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). This solution was then diluted 1:200 in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.8 and added to HBc samples for a final concentration of 0.1 mM. Reactions were permitted to proceed at room temperature for 15 minutes. The plate was read at 412 nm on a Spectramax™ (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Colorimetric analysis was then performed to determine disulfide bond formation, where reactivity of Ellman's reagent with free sulfhydryls yielded a yellow color and complete disulfide bonding in a sample resulted in no color.

[0443] The final characterization of particles was performed using non-reducing and reducing SDS-PAGE gels to examine disulfide bond induced cross-linking of monomers and dimers, as well as monomer integrity. All SDS-PAGE gels were run using the NuPAGE™ system from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.). NUPAGE™ 10% Bis-Tris 1.5 mm×10 well gels were run using MES buffer in XCell SureLock™ electrophoresis apparatuses. Samples were prepared by addition of LDS NUPAGE™ sample buffer and heating for 10 minutes at 50° C. To prepare reduced samples, β-mercaptoethanol was added prior to the heating step for a final concentration of 10%.

[0444] Gels were run for 30-40 minutes at 200V and then stained with SimplyBlue SafeStain™ (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) following provided protocols. Cross-linking in non-reducing samples was established by the absence of monomeric and dimeric species and the presence of high molecular weight protein visible as a smear at the top of the gel. Monomeric integrity was established by the presence of one defined band of the same molecular weight as known standards (approximately 17 kDa).

[0445] Stability of particles was assessed using the above methods on samples incubated at various temperatures (4° C., room temperature, and 37° C.) over time, collecting samples for analysis on days zero, 3, 7, and 14.

[0446] E. Vectors to Express Chimer Particles Containing an N-Terminal Cysteine and the CS-Repeat Epitopes from P. falciparum in the Immunodominant Loop

[0447] Two expression vectors [V2.Pf1(N-MGCELDP) and V2.Pf1(N-MGCDIDP)] are prepared to determine the ability of N-terminal cysteine residues to stabilize chimer particles. To make the vector V2.Pf1(N-MGCELDP), the oligonucleotides HBc(MGCELDP)-NcoI-F and HBc149/HindIII-R are used to amplify the hybrid HBc gene from vector V2.Pf1. The resultant 528 bp fragment is cleaved with NcoI and HindIII and inserted into pKK-223-3N, which had been cleaved with the same two enzymes.

[0448] To make the vector V2.Pf1(N-MGCDIDP) the oligonucleotides HBc(MGCDIDP)-NcoI-F and HBc149/HindIII-R are used to amplify the hybrid HBc gene from vector V2.Pf1. The resultant 528 bp fragment is cleaved with NcoI and HindIII and inserted into pKK-223-3N, which has been cleaved with the same two enzymes.

12HBc (MGCELDP)-NcoI-FM G C E L D P Y K E F GSEQ ID NO:2775′-GCGCCATGG GGTGTGAGCTCGACCCTTATAAAGAATTTGGSEQ ID NO:278HBc (MGCDIDP)-NcoI-FM G C D I D P Y K E F GSEQ ID NO:2795′-GCGCCATGG GGTGTGACATCGACCCTTATAAAGAATTTGGSEQ ID NO:280

[0449] F. Preparation of V7 Cloning Vector

[0450] To enable the fusion of T cell epitopes to the C terminus of a HBc chimer, a new vector was constructed. Unique EcoRI and SacI restriction sites were inserted between valine-149 and the HindIII site to facilitate directional insertion of synthetic dsDNAs into EcoRI-HindIII (or EcoRI-SacI) restriction sites. The pair of PCR primers below was used to amplify the HBc 149 gene with an NcoI restriction site at the amino-terminus and EcoRI, SacI and HindIII sites at the carboxyl-terminus. The product of the PCR reaction (479 bp) was digested with NcoI and HindIII and cloned into pKK223-3N to form V7.

[0451] To insert T cell epitopes, the plasmid (V7) was digested with EcoRI and HindIII (or EcoRI and SacI) and synthetic dsDNA fragments having EcoRI/HindIII (or EcoRI/SacI) overhangs, were ligated into V7. For all V7 constructs, the final amino acid of native HBc (valine-149) and the first amino acid of the inserted T cell epitope are separated by a glycine-isoleucine dipeptide sequence coded for by the nucleotides that form the EcoRI restriction site. For epitopes inserted at EcoRI/SacI, there are additional glutamic acid-leucine residues after the T cell epitope, prior to the termination codon, contributed by the SacI site. Restriction sites are again underlined in the primers shown.

13HBc149/NcoI-F5′-TTGGGCCATGGACATCGACCCTTASEQ ID NO:263HBc149/SacI-EcoRI-H3-R5′-CGCAAGCTTAGAGCTCTTGAATTCCAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGSEQ ID NO:281

[0452] G. Preparation of V12 Expression Constructs

[0453] V12 vectors, which contain B cell epitopes between amino acids 78 and 79, as well as T cell epitopes downstream of valine-149, are constructed from V2 and V7 vectors. The carboxyl terminus of a V7 vector containing a T cell epitope inserted at EcoRI/HindIII is amplified using two PCR primers (HBc-P79/SacI-F and pKK223-3/4515-32R) to provide a dsDNA fragment corresponding to amino acids 79-149 plus the T cell epitope, flanked with SacI and HindIII restriction sites.

[0454] The PCR products are cut with SacI and HindIII and then cloned into the desired V2 vector prepared by cutting with the same two enzymes. The PCR primers are amenable for the amplification of the carboxyl terminus of all V7 genes, irrespective of the T cell epitope present after amino acid 149 of the HBc gene.

[0455] Restriction sites are underlined.

14HBc-P79/SacI-F5′ -CGCGAGCTCCCAGCGTCTAGAGACCTAGSEQ ID NO: 282pKK223-3/4515-32R5′ -GTATCAGGCTGAAAATCSEQ ID NO: 283

[0456] H. P. falciparum CS-repeat B cell Epitopes Inserted into V2

[0457] For V2 and V7 constructs, synthetic dsDNA fragments coding for the B (V2) or T cell epitope (V7) of interest are inserted into EcoRI/SacI restriction sites. Synthetic dsDNA fragments, encoding B and T cell epitopes of interest, are prepared by mixing complementary single stranded DNA oligonucleotides at equimolar concentrations, heating to 95° C. for 5 minutes, and then cooling to room temperature at a rate of −1° C. per minute. This annealing reaction is performed in TE buffer. The double-stranded DNAs are shown below with the encoded epitope sequence shown above. The pound symbol, #, is used in some of the amino acid residue sequences that follow to indicate the presence of a stop codon.

15Pf1 I N A N P N A N P N A N P N AAATTAACGCTAATCCGAACGCTAATCCGAACGCTAATCCGAACGCTA TTGCGATTAGGCTTGCGATTAGGCTTGCGATTAGGCTTGCGATN P E LSEQ ID NO: 284ATCCGGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 285TAGGCCSEQ ID NO: 286Pf3 I N A N P N V D P N A N P N A N PAATTAACGCTAATCCGAACGTTGACCCGAACGCTAATCCGAACGCTAATCCGA TTGCGATTAGGCTTGCAACTGGGCTTGCGATTAGGCTTGCGATTAGGCTN A N P N V D P N A N P E LSEQ ID NO: 287ACGCTAATCCGAACGTTGACCCGAACGCTAATCCGGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 288TGCGATTAGGCTTGCAACTGGGCTTGCGATTAGGCCTCGAGGSEQ ID NO: 289Pf3.1 I N A N P N V D P N A N P N A N PAATTAACGCGAATCCGAACGTGGATCCGAATGCCAACCCTAACGCCAACCCTTGCGCTTAGGCTTGCACCTAGGCTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGGTTGGG N A N P E LSEQ ID NO: 290AAATGCGAACCCAGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 291TTTACGCTTGGGTCSEQ ID NO: 292Pf3.2 I N A N P N A N P N A N P N V D PAATTAACGCGAATCCGAATGCCAACCCTAACGCCAACCCAAACGTGGATCCGA TTGCGCTTAGGCTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGGTTGGGTTTGCACCTAGGCTN A N P E LSEQ ID NO: 293ATGCGAACCCAGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 294TACGCTTGGGTCSEQ ID NO: 295Pf3.3 I N A N P N V D P N A N P N A N PAATTAACGCGAATCCGAACGTGGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAA TTGCGCTTAGGCTTGCACCTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTN A N P N V D P N A N P E LSEQ ID NO: 296ACGCCAACCCGAATGTTGACCCCAATGCCAATCCGGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 297TGCGGTTGGGCTTACAACTGGGGTTACGGTTAGGCCSEQ ID NO: 298Pf3.4 I N P N V D P N A N P N A N P N AAATTAATCCGAACGTGGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCA TTAGGCTTGCACCTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTN P N V E LSEQ ID NO: 299ACCCGAATGTTGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 300TGGGCTTACAACSEQ ID NO: 301Pf3.5 I N P N V D P N A N P N A N P N AAATTAATCCGAACGTGGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCA TTAGGCTTGCACCTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTN P N V D P E LSEQ ID NO: 302ACCCGAATGTTGACCCTGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 303TGGGCTTACAACTGGGACSEQ ID NO: 304Pf3.6 I N P N V D P N A N P N A N P N AAATTAATCCGAACGTGGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCA TTAGGCTTGCACCTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTN P N V D P N A E LSEQ ID NO: 305ACCCGAATGTTGACCCTAATGCTGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 306TGGGCTTACAACTGGGATTACGACSEQ ID NO: 307Pf3.7 I N V D P N A N P N A N P N A N PAATTAACGTGGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCAACCCGA TTGCACCTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTTGGGCTN V E LSEQ ID NO: 308ATGTTGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 309TACAACSEQ ID NO: 310Pf3.8 I N V D P N A N P N A N P N A N PAATTAACGTGGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCAACCCGA TTGCACCTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTTGGGCTN V D P E LSEQ ID NO: 311ATGTTGACCCTGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 312TACAACTGGGACSEQ ID NO: 313Pf3.9 I N V D P N A N P N A N P N A N PAATTAACGTGGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCAACCCGA TTGCACCTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTTGGGCTN V D P N A E LSEQ ID NO: 314ATGTTGACCCTAATGCTGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 315TACAACTGGGATTACGACSEQ ID NO: 316Pf3.10 I D P N A N P N A N P N A N PAATTGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCAACC CTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTTGG N V E LSEQ ID NO: 317CGAATGTTGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 318GCTTACAACSEQ ID NO: 319Pf3.11 I D P N A N P N A N P N A N P N VAATTGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCAACCCGAATGTTG CTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTTGGGCTTACAACD P E LSEQ ID NO: 320ACCCTGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 321TGGGACSEQ ID NO: 322Pf3.12 I D P N A N P N A N P N A N P N VAATTGATCCAAATGCCAACCCTAACGCTAATCCAAACGCCAACCCGAATGTTG CTAGGTTTACGGTTGGGATTGCGATTAGGTTTGCGGTTGGGCTTACAACD P N A E LSEQ ID NO: 323ACCCTAATGCCGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 324TGGGATTACGGCSEQ ID NO: 325Pf-UTC (PF/CS326-345)I E Y L N K I Q N S L S T E W S PAATTGAATATCTGAACAAAATCCAGAACTCTCTGTCCACCGAATGGTCTCCGT CTTATAGACTTGTTTTAGGTCTTGAGAGACAGGTGGCTTACCAGAGGCAC S V T # #SEQ ID NO: 326GCTCCGTTACCTAGTASEQ ID NO: 327CGAGGCAATGGATCATTCGASEQ ID NO: 328I. P. vivax CS-repeat B cell epitopesPv-T1AI P A G D R A D G Q P A G D R A AAATTCCGGCTGGTGACCGTGCAGATGGCCAGCCAGCGGGTGACCGCGCTGCAG GGCCGACCACTGGCACGTCTACCGGTCGGTCGCCCACTGGCGCGACGTCG Q P A G E LSEQ ID NO: 329GCCAGCCGGCTGGCGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 330CGGTCGGCCGACCGCSEQ ID NO: 331Pv-T1BI D R A A G Q P A G D R A D G Q PAATTGACAGAGCAGCCGGACAACCAGCAGGCGATCGAGCAGACGGACAGCCCG CTGTCTCGTCGGCCTGTTGGTCGTCCGCTAGCTCGTCTGCCTGTCGGGCA G E LSEQ ID NO: 332CAGGGGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 333GTCCCCSEQ ID NO: 334Pv-T2AI A N G A G N Q P G A N G A G D QAATTGCGAACGGCGCCGGTAATCAGCCGGGGGCAAACGGCGCGGGTGATCAAC CGCTTGCCGCGGCCATTAGTCGGCCCCCGTTTGCCGCGCCCACTAGTTGP G E LSEQ ID NO: 335CAGGGGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 336GTCCCCSEQ ID NO: 337Pv-T2B I A N G A D N Q P G A N G A D D QAATTGCGAACGGCGCCGATAATCAGCCGGGTGCAAACGGGGCGGATGACCAAC CGCTTGCCGCGGCTATTAGTCGGCCCACGTTTGCCCCGCCTACTGGTTGP G E LSEQ ID NO: 338CAGGCGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 339GTCCGCSEQ ID NO: 340Pv-T2C I A N G A G N Q P G A N G A G D QAATTGCGAACGGCGCCGGTAATCAGCCGGGAGCAAACGGCGCGGGGGATCAAC CGCTTGCCGCGGCCATTAGTCGGCCCTCGTTTGCCGCGCCCCCTAGTTGP G A N G A D N Q P G A N G A D DCAGGCGCCAATGGTGCAGACAACCAGCCTGGGGCGAATGGAGCCGATGACCGTCCGCGGTTACCACGTCTGTTGGTCGGACCCCGCTTACCTCGGCTACTGGQ P G E LSEQ ID NO: 341AACCCGGCGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 342TTGGGCCGCSEQ ID NO: 343PV-T3I A P G A N Q E G G A A A P G A NAATTGCGCCGGGCGCCAACCAGGAAGGTGGGGCTGCAGCGCCAGGAGCCAATC CGCGGCCCGCGGTTGGTCCTTCCACCCCGACGTCGCGGTCCTCGGTTAGQ E G G A A E LSEQ ID NO: 344AAGAAGGCGGTGCAGCGGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 345TTCTTCCGCCACGTCGCCSEQ ID NO: 346

Example 2

Preparation of Chimers Containing Influenza A M2 Polypeptide Sequences

[0458] A. Insertion of Influenza A M2 N-terminal Domain into V2, V7, V8, V16, V34, V47, V48, V54, and V55 Cloning Vectors

[0459] For V2, V7, V8, V16, V34 and V55 constructs, synthetic dsDNA fragments coding for an M2 epitope (residues 2-24 of the influenza A M2 protein; SEQ ID NO:9) were inserted into EcoRI/SacI restriction sites, whereas for V47, V48, and V54 constructs, residues 1-24 of the same were inserted into NcoI/SacI restriction sites. Synthetic dsDNA fragments were prepared by mixing complementary single stranded DNA oligonucleotides at equimolar concentrations, heating to 95° C. for 5 minutes, and then cooling to room temperature at a rate of −1° C. per minute. This annealing reaction was performed in TE buffer. The double-stranded DNAs are shown below with the encoded epitope sequence shown above.

16V2/V7/V8/V16/V34/V55M2 (2-24) I S L L T E V E T P I R N E W G C RAATTAGCCTGTTAACCGAAGTGGAGACGCCGATCCGTAACGAATGGGGCTGCCG TCGGACAATTGGCTTCACCTCTGCGGCTAGGCATTGCTTACCCCGACGGC C N D S S D E LSEQ ID NO: 347CTGTAATGATTCTTCCGACGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 348GACATTACTAAGAAGGCTGCSEQ ID NO: 349V47/V48/V54M2 (1-24) M S L L T E V E T P I R N E W G C RCATGTCTCTGCTGACCGAAGTTGAAACCCCTATCAGAAACGAATGGGGGTGCAGA AGAGACGACTGGCTTCAACTTTGGGGATAGTCTTTGCTTACCCCCACGTCT C N D S S D E LSEQ ID NO: 350TGTAACGATTCAAGTGATGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 351ACATTGCTAAGTTCACTACSEQ ID NO: 352

[0460] B. Insertion of Individual Cysteine-Mutated Influenza A M2 N-Terminal Domains [M2(1-24/C17S), M2(1-24/C19S)] into V47 Expression Vector

[0461] Annealed DNA fragments encoding residues 1-24 of the M2 protein with the cysteine at either position 17 or 19 mutated to serine are shown below. They were inserted into the NcoI/SacI restriction sites of V47 as described in part A above.

17V47M2 (1-24/C17S) M S L L T E V E T P I R N E W G S RCATGTCTCTGCTGACCGAAGTTGAAACCCCTATCAGAAACGAATGGGGGTCTAGA AGAGACGACTGGCTTCAACTTTGGGGATAGTCTTTGCTTACCCCCAGATCT C N D S S D E LSEQ ID NO: 353TGTAACGATTCAAGTGATGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 354ACATTGCTAAGTTCACTACSEQ ID NO: 355M2 (1-24/C19S) M S L L T E V E T P I R E W G C RCATGTCTCTGCTGACCGAAGTTGAAACCCCTATCAGAAACGAATGGGGGTGCAGA AGAGACGACTGGCTTCAACTTTGGGGATAGTCTTTGCTTACCCCCACGTCT S N D S S D E LSEQ ID NO: 356TCGAACGATTCAAGTGATGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 357AGCTTGCTAAGTTCACTACSEQ ID NO: 358

[0462] C. Insertion of Cysteine-Mutated Influenza A M2 N-Terminal Domain [M2(2-24/C17S,C19S)] into Expression Vectors V8, V16, V47, V48, and V54

[0463] For V8 and V16 constructs, synthetic dsDNA fragments harboring two cysteine to serine mutations and coding for the M2 epitope (residues 2-24 of the influenza A M2 protein) were inserted into EcoRI/SacI restriction sites, whereas for V47, V48, and V54 constructs, residues 1-24 of the same were inserted into NcoI/SacI restriction sites. Synthetic dsDNA fragments were prepared as described in part A above.

18V8, V16M2 (2-24/C17S, C19S) I S L L T E V E T P I R N E W G S RAATTTCTCTGTTAACCGAAGTGGAGACGCCGATTCGTAACGAATGGGGTAGCCGC AGAGACAATTGGCTTCACCTCTGCGGCTAAGCATTGCTTACCCCATCGGCG S N D S S D E LSEQ ID NO: 359TCTAATGATAGCTCTGACGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 360AGATTACTATCGAGACTGCSEQ ID NO: 361M2 (1-24/C17S, C19S) M S L L T E V E T P I R N E W G S RCATGTCTCTGCTGACCGAAGTTGAAACCCCTATCAGAAACGAATGGGGGTCTAGA AGAGACGACTGGCTTCAACTTTGGGGATAGTCTTTGCTTACCCCCAGATCT S N D S S D E LSEQ ID NO: 362TCGAACGATTCAAGTGATGAGCTSEQ ID NO: 363AGCTTGCTAAGTTCACTACSEQ ID NO: 364

[0464] D. Insertion of Additional Copies of the Influenza A M2 N-Terminal Domain onto the N-Terminus of the Expression Vector V54.M2(1-24)

[0465] One additional copy of either native M2 sequence [M2(1-24)] or mutated M2 sequence [M2(1-24/C17S, C19S) was cloned N-terminally to the existing M2(1-24) sequence. In constructing these clones, the original methionine is removed, such that the added copy supplies only one initiator methionine. PCR was used to make the constructs in two fragments. To make the clone containing two native M2 copies [M2(1-24)/V54.M2(2-24)], the template V54.M2(1-24) was used to amplify first the N-terminal fragment, which inserts an XhoI site (and, therefore, amino acids leucine, followed by glutamic acid) after D24 of the M2 sequence (resultant fragment is 353 bp), then the C-terminal fragment, which inserts an XhoI site N-terminal to S2 of the M2 sequence, thereby removing the methionine (resultant fragment is 538 bp). To make the clone containing a mutant, followed by a native copy of M2 [M2(1-24/C17S,C19S/V54.M2(2-24)]), the template V54.M2(1-24/C17S,C19S) was used to generate the N-terminal fragment, while the C-terminal fragment is identical to that above (resultant fragment sizes are also identical).

[0466] The N-terminal fragments prepared were digested with BamHI and XhoI, and the C-terminal fragment was digested with XhoI and HindIII. Fragment pairs were then ligated together at the common XhoI overhangs. The resultant BamHI-HindIII fragments were then ligated into the pKK223-3N vector, which had been prepared by digestion with BamHI and HindIII.

[0467] Two additional copies of mutated M2 sequence were cloned N-terminally to existing M2(1-24) sequence. Again, only one initiator methionine was preserved at position one of the gene to yield the construct M2(1-24/C17S,C19S/M2(2-24/C17S,C19S/V54.M2(2-24). Again, the clone was produced in two PCR fragments. The template V54.M2(1-24/C17S,C19S) was used to generate the N-terminal fragment, which inserts a PstI site (and, therefore, amino acids leucine, followed by glutamine) after D24 of the mutant M2 sequence (resultant fragment is 353 bp). The template M2(1-24/C17S,C19S/V54.M2(2-24) from above was used to generate the C-terminal fragment, which inserts a PstI site N-terminal to S2 of the mutant M2 sequence, thereby removing the methionine (resultant fragment is 613 bp).

[0468] The N-terminal fragment prepared was digested with BamHI and PstI, and the C-terminal fragment was digested with PstI and HindIII. Fragment pairs were then ligated together at the common PstI overhangs. The resultant BamHI-HindIII fragment was then ligated into the pKK223-3N vector, which had been prepared by digestion with BamHI and HindIII.

19M2 (1-24)/V54.M2 (2-24); M2 (1-24/C17S, C19S/V54.M2 (2-24)pKK-BamHI-F5′ -CGTAGAGGATCCGGAGCTTATCGACTGCACGGSEQ ID NO: 365M2-D24/XhoI-R5′ -GCGCTCGAGATCACTTGAATCGTTSEQ ID NO: 366M2-XhoI/S2-F5′ -GCGCTCGAGAGCTTATTGACCGAAGTTGAAACCSEQ ID NO: 367HBC149 + C/HindIII-R5′ -CGCAAGCTTACTAGCAAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGGAAGSEQ ID NO: 267M2 (1-24/C17S, C19S)/M2 (2-24/C17S, C19S)/V54.M2 (2-24)pKK-BamHI-F5′ -CGTAGAGGATCCGGAGCTTATCGACTGCACGGSEQ ID NO: 365M2-D24/PstI-R5′ -GCGCTGCAGATCACTTGAATCGTTSEQ ID NO: 368M2-PstI/S2-F5′ -GCGCTGCAGTCTCTGCTGACCGAAGSEQ ID NO: 369HBc149 + C/HindIII-R5′ -CGCAAGCTTACTAGCAAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGGAAGSEQ ID NO: 267

[0469] E. Construction of Truncated Version of Native M2-HBc

[0470] The original M2-HBc construct [Neirynck et al., (1999) Nature Med., 5(10):1157-1163: WO 99/07839] that contained the 183-residue, full length HBc sequence was truncated to V149, and the entire gene was moved into the pKK223-3 expression vector. To achieve this, the plasmid 3453, which was provided by the University of Gent, was used as a template for a PCR reaction that yielded a product of 523 bp. This product was digested with restriction enzymes AflIII and HindIII, and then ligated into the pKK223-3N vector, which had been prepared by digestion with NcoI and HindIII.

20AflIII-M2-F5′ -CGCGACATGTCTCTGCTGACCGSEQ ID NO: 370HBc-HindIII-R5′ -CGCAAGCTTAAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGGAAGSEQ ID NO: 371

[0471]

21

Clone

Number
Clone Name

CV-1438
V34.M2(2-24)

CV-1440
V2.M2(2-24)

CV-1475
V16.M2(2-24)

CV-1492
V52.M2(2-24)

CV-1560
3453/149

CV-1569
V16.M2(1-24/C17S,C19S)

CV-1586
V8.M2(2-24)

CV-1587
V8.M2(1-24/C17S,C19S)

CV-1588
V7.M2(2-24)

CV-1590
V47.M2(1-24)

CV-1603
V47.M2(1-24/C17S,C19S)

CV-1604
V54.M2(1-24)

CV-1605
V54.M2(1-24/C17S,C19S)

CV-1606
V48.M2(1-24)

CV-1607
V48.M2(1-24/C17S,C19S)

CV-1671
V47.M2(1-24/C17S)

CV-1672
V47.M2(1-24/C19S)

CV-1816
M2(1-24)/V54.M2(2-24)

CV-1817
M2(1-24/C17S,C19S/V54.M2(2-24)

CV-1818
M2(1-24/C17S,C19S)/M2(2-24/

C17S,C19S)/V54.M2(2-24)

Example 3

Synthesis of Expression Vectors for Expressing Partially Truncated Particles

[0472] To prepare expression plasmids for expressing partially truncated HBc particles, a single amino terminal oligonucleotide PCR primer (HBc149/NcoI-F) was used in combination with a unique C-terminal primer. For example, to prepare the HBc156 (E.cR; CV-1600 particles) expression plasmid, the primers HBc149/NcoI-F and HBc156(E.cR)—H3-R are used. Primers HBc149/NcoI-F and HBc156C(E.cR)—H3-R were used to prepare the HBc156(E.cR)+C (CV-1601 particles) expression plasmids. The sequences of all primers used are displayed below.

[0473] In addition to truncating the particles, and in some cases incorporating a C-terminal cysteine residue, codons that are optimal for expression in E. coli were also used. It is known that several arginine codons, particularly AGA and AGG are rarely used by E. coli and are believed to be problematic for efficient expression of proteins in E. coli by leading to stalling of polypeptide synthesis during translation and resulting in premature termination. Of the 16 arginine codons between 150 and 183 of HBc, 7 are encoded by the rare AGA codon and 2 are encoded by the very rare AGG codon. Therefore, in this study, all AGA and AGG codons were replaced with codons that are more frequently used by E. coli.

[0474] To enable sequential replacement of the rare arginine codons, HBc156 genes were synthesized first (CV-1600 and CV-1601 particles), and then used as a template for the HBc163 constructs (CV-1634 and CV-1632 particles); the HBc163 constructs were thereafter used as a template for the HBc171 constructs (CV-1642 and CV-1643 particles); finally, the HBc 171 constructs are used as a templates for the arginine codon optimized HBc182 and HBc183 constructs. A non-optimized HBc182 construct (CV-1575) was also prepared for control purposes. All PCR products were cleaved with the restriction enzymes NcoI and HindIII and cloned into the expression vector pKK223-3N, which had been cut with the same enzymes as discussed before.

[0475] Amino Terminal Primer Sequence (NcoI restriction site is underlined):

22HBc149/NcoI-F5′ -TTGGGCCATGGACATCGACCCTTASEQ ID NO: 263 Carboxyl-Terminal Primer Sequences (HindIIIrestriction sites are underlined):HBc156 (E.cR) -H3-R5′ -GCGAAGCTTACTAAGGGGAGCGGCCTCGTCGACGAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGGSEQ ID NO: 372HBc156C (E.cR) -H3-R5′ -GCGAAGCTTACTAACAAGGGGAGCGGCCTCGTCGACGAACAACAGTAGT-SEQ ID NO: 373CTCCGGHBc163 (E.cR) -H3-R5′ -GCGAAGCTTACTAAGGCGAGGGAGTGCGCCGACGAGGGGAGCGGCCTCGSEQ ID NO: 374HBc163C (E.cR) -H3-R5′ -GCGAAGCTTACTAACAAGGCGAGGGAGTGCGCCGACGAGGGGAGCGGCCTCGSEQ ID NO: 375Hbc171 (E.cR) -H3-R5′ - GCGAAGCTTACTACGGCGATTGAGAGCGTCGACGGCGAGGCGAGGGAGTSEQ ID NO: 376HBc171C (E.cR) -H3-R5′ -GCGAAGCTTACTAACACGGCGATTGAGAGCGTCGACGGCGAGGCGAGGGAGTSEQ ID NO: 377HBc183 (E.cR) -H3-R5′ -GCGAAGCTTACTAACATTGAGATTCCCGAGATTGAGATCGCCGGCGACGCGG-SEQ ID NO: 378CGATTGAGAGCGTCHBc182-H3-R5′ -GCGAAGCTTACTATTGAGATTCCCGAGATTGASEQ ID NO: 379HBc183-H3-R5′ -GGAAAGCTTACTAACATTGAGATTCCCGSEQ ID NO: 380HBc149/HindIII-R5′ -CGCAAGCTTAAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGGAAGSEQ ID NO: 266HBc149 + C/HindIII-R5′ -CGCAAGCTTACTAGCAAACAACAGTAGTCTCCGGAAGSEQ ID NO: 267

[0476]

23

Clone Number
Clone Name

CV-1600
HBc156(E.cR)

CV-1601
HBc156(E.cR) + C

CV-1632
HBc163(E.cR) + C

CV-1634
HBc163(E.cR)

CV-1642
HBc171(E.cR)

CV-1643
HBc171(E.cR) + C

[0477] The table, below, shows an alignment that illustrates the configuration of the C-termini of the full-length HBcAg (HBc183), and all particles harboring C-terminal truncations. Sequences are aligned according to amino acid residue position 149 from the N-terminus of HBc of SEQ ID NO:1 that is shared by all constructs. C-terminal cysteine residues, when present, are underlined.

24TABLEConstruct NameSequenceSEQ ID NOHBc183VRRRGRSPRRRTPSPRRRRSQSPRRRRSQSRESQC381HBc182VRRRGRSPRRRTPSPRRRRSQSPRRRRSQSRESQ382HBc171 (E.cR) + CVRRRGRSPRRRTPSPRRRRSQSPC383HBc171 (E.cR)VRRRGRSPRRRTPSPRRRRSQSP384HBc163 (E.cR) + CVRRRGRSPRRRTPSPC385HBc163 (E.cR)VRRRGRSPRRRTPSP386HBc156 (E.cR) + CVRRRGRSPC387HBc156 (E.cR)VRRRGRSP388

Example 4

Assay Procedures

[0478] A. Antigenicity

[0479] 1. Particle ELISA

[0480] Purified particles were diluted to a concentration of 2 μg/mL in coating buffer (50 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.6) and coated onto the wells of ELISA strips (100 μL/well). The ELISA strips are incubated at room temperature overnight (about 18 hours). Next morning, the wells are washed with ELISA wash buffer (EWB) [phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, 0.05% Tween®-20] and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 hour (200 μL/well). ELISA strips were stored, dry, at −20° C. until needed.

[0481] To determine the antigenicity of particles, antisera are diluted using 1% BSA in EWB and 100 μL/well added to antigen-coated ELISA wells. Sera are incubated for 1 hour, washed with ELISA wash buffer (above) and probed using an anti-mouse (IgG)-HRP (The Binding Site, San Diego, Calif.; HRP=horseradish peroxidase) conjugate (100 μL/well) or other appropriate antibody for 1 hour. After washing with ELISA wash buffer the reaction was visualized by the addition of TM Blue substrate (100 μL/well). After 10 minutes, the reaction is stopped by the addition of 1N H2SO4 (100 μL/well) and read on an ELISA plate reader set at 450 nm.

[0482] 2. Synthetic Peptide ELISA

[0483] A 20 amino acid residue synthetic peptide (NANP)5 or 24 amino acid residue synthetic peptide M2 is diluted to a concentration of 1 μg/mL in coating buffer (50 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.6) and coated onto the wells of ELISA strips (100 μL/well). Peptides are dried onto the wells by incubating overnight (about 18 hours), in a 37° C. incubator. Next morning, the wells are washed with ELISA wash buffer (phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, 0.05% Tween®-20) and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS (200 μL/well) for 1 hour. ELISA strips are stored, dry, at −20° C. until needed.

[0484] To determine antibody antigenicity of particles, antisera (monoclonal or polyclonal) are diluted using 1% BSA in EWB, and 100 μL/well added to peptide-coated ELISA wells. Sera are incubated for 1 hour, washed with ELISA wash buffer, and probed using an anti-mouse(IgG)-HRP conjugate (as above at 100 μL/well) or other appropriate antibody for 1 hour, washed again with ELISA wash buffer, and then visualized by the addition of TM Blue substrate (100 μL/well). After 10 minutes, the reaction is stopped by the addition of 1N H2SO4 (100 μL/well) and read on an ELISA plate reader set at 450 nm.

[0485] B. Immunogenicity of Particles

[0486] To assay the immunogenicity of particles, mice are immunized, IP, with 10 or 20 μg of particles in an adjuvant of choice, and then boosted at 4 weeks with 10 μg in the same adjuvant. Mice are bled at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks.

Example 5

Determination of 280:260 Absorbance Ratios

[0487] To determine the 280:260 absorbance ratio of purified particles, the particles were diluted to a concentration of approximately 0.2 mg/mL in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, and absorbance values determined at wavelengths of 260 and 280 nm. The absorbance measured at 280 nm was divided by the value at 260 nm to determine the 280:260 ratio. The ratios were obtained for several samples, including native particles (HBc183), HBc particles truncated after residue position 149 (HBc149), and several HBc chimers that are identified elsewhere herein, are shown below in the Table. Full length particle CV-1559 is a preparation of the particles first reported in Neirynck et al., (1999) Nature Med., 5(10):1157-1163, whereas full length particle CV-1607 is a similar particle, in which the M2 polypeptide cysteines at polypeptide positions 17 and 19, (X17 and X19 of SEQ ID NO:9) were mutated to serine residues.

25TABLEFull Length, (F)280:260Particleor C-TerminalAbsorbanceNumberTruncated, (T)Ratio HBc183F0.84 CV-1532 HBc149T1.59 CV-1438T1.57 CV-1440TNT CV-1475T1.04 CV-1492T1.33*CV-1559F0.68 CV-1560T1.36 CV-1569T1.38 CV-1588T1.16 CV-1590T1.51 CV-1603T1.68 CV-1604T1.40 CV-1605T1.26 CV-1607F0.73 CV-1600T1.23 CV-1601T1.12 CV-1634T0.92 CV-1632T0.96 CV-1642T0.79 CV-1643T0.77 CV-1671TNT CV-1672T1.27NT, not tested. *CV-1159 is identical to IM2-HBc described by Neirynck, 1999.

Example 6

Thermal Stability Protocol

[0488] Purified particles were diluted to a concentration of 0.5-1 mg/mL using 50 mM NaPO4, pH 6.8 and allowed to incubate at 4° C., room temperature, or 37° C. Samples were taken at various time points and mixed with SDS-PAGE sample buffer (reducing) and run on 10% SDS-PAGE gels. Gels were stained using SimplyBlue SafeStain (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.), and then analyzed.

Example 7

Analytical Gel Filtration

[0489] Analysis of Hybrid Particles

[0490] Analytical gel filtration analysis of purified hybrid HBc particles was performed using a 25 mL Superose 6 HR 10/30 chromatographic column (Amersham Pharmacia # 17-0537-01) and a BioCAD™ SPRINT Perfusion Chromatography System. The UV detector is set to monitor a wavelength of 280 nm. The column was equilibrated with 3 column volumes (CV; about 75 mL) of buffer (20 mM NaPO4, pH 6.8) at a flow rate of 0.50 mL/minute.

[0491] The particles to be analyzed were diluted to a concentration of 1 mg/mL using 20 mM NaPO4, pH 6.8. 200 Microliters (μL) of the sample were then loaded onto a 200 μL loop and injected onto the column. The sample was eluted from the column with 20 mM NaPO4, pH 6.8 at a flow rate of 0.50 mL/minute.

[0492] Particles containing N-terminal cysteine residues or similar particles free of such cysteines were analyzed using the above procedure. Integration of the 280 nm trace was carried out using BioCAD™ software (PerSeptive™).

Example 8

Influenza M2 Constructs

[0493] Recently, Neirynck et al., (1999) Nature Med., 5(10):1157-1163 and WO 99/07839 reported the fusion of the 24 amino acid extracellular domain of M2 to the N-terminus of full-length HBc particles (HBc183), lacking amino acid residues 1-4. A schematic representation of that construct referred to herein as IM2HBc is shown below in which the 24-mer is linked to the N-terminus of HBc.

26 IM2HBcMSLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSD-HBc (5-183)SEQ ID NO: 389

[0494] In one illustrative preparation, the M2 epitope was inserted into the immunodominant loop of hepatitis B core and particles referred to as CV-1475 were successfully expressed and purified using techniques discussed previously for such insertions and purifications. A mutated version of the M2 epitope, in which two cysteine residues at M2 native positions 17 and 19 were substituted by alanine residues, was also expressed in the immunodominant loop (CV-1473 particles) and the resulting particles purified. These two particles are illustrated schematically below.

27 CV-1475HBc (1-78) -GI-SLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSD-EL-HBc (79-149)SEQ ID NO: 390 CV-1473HBc (1-78) -GI-SLLTEVETPIRNEWGARANDSSD-EL-HBc (79-149) -CSEQ ID NO: 391

[0495] The CV-1473 particle construct yielded approximately 7-fold more purified particles when compared with the native sequence (CV-1475). It remains to be determined if the mutation of the cysteine residues alters protective potential of the particles. However, epitopes delivered on the immunodominant loops of HBc are usually significantly more immunogenic as compared to when the same are fused to other regions (including the N-terminus), and resulting particles exhibit reduced anti-HBc immunogenicity.

[0496] Particles have also been prepared in which the M2 N-terminal 24-mer epitope was fused to the N-terminus of C-terminal truncated hepatitis B core particles. That construct (CV-1438) also contained the N-terminal pre-core sequence (SEQ ID NO:259). A similar construct was prepared that contained a single cysteine residue at the end of the hybrid protein (CV-1492), in this case immediately after Val-149 of the HBc gene. These constructs are shown schematically below.

28 CV-1438MGISLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSDELLGWLWGI-HBc (2-149)SEQ ID NO: 392 CV-1492MGISLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSDELLGWLWGI-HBc (2-149) -CSEQ ID NO: 393

[0497] It should be noted that to guard against translation initiation from the natural HBc initiator methionine, the codon for that residue was omitted. Residues contributed by EcoRI (GI) and SacI (EL) restriction sites are underlined. The pre-core sequence is recited between the underlined EL residues and “-HBc(2-149)”.

[0498] Analysis by SDS-PAGE, showed that upon preparation, the CV-1438 monomer construct was unstable as compared to CV-1492, with HBc149, CV-1475 and CV-1473 serving as additional molecular weight controls on the SDS-PAGE gel. The instability of the CV-1438 monomers was not evident using analytical gel filtration of particles.

[0499] Both CV-1475 were expected to have slightly lower molecular weights than CV-1438 and CV-1492, because the former two contain the M2 epitope inserted directly into the immunodominant loop and therefore lack the pre-core sequence (SEQ ID NO:259) present in CV-1438 and CV-1492. As expected, CV-1492 was larger than CV-1475 and CV-1473; however, CV-1438, which is identical to CV-1492 save the C-terminal cysteine residue, is clearly not larger than CV-1475 and CV-1473 due to an apparent cleavage.

[0500] A construct containing an M2 N-terminal extracellular sequence as discussed before linked to the HBc N-terminus (Domain I) or loop (Domain II) and also containing an M2 protein C-terminal sequence such as that of SEQ ID NO: 11 (see Table A) linked to the loop (Domain II) or at the C-terminus (Domain IV) of HBc is also contemplated. Such a contemplated construct also contains at least one stabilizing C-terminal cysteine residue as discussed elsewhere herein.

[0501] To modify the amino-terminus of hybrid HBc particles containing immunodominant loop fusions to incorporate a cysteine residue, and minimal M2-derived sequence, a series of synthetic oligonucleotides are synthesized. To make V2.Pf1(N-M2(17-24/C17S), the oligonucleotides M2(17-24/C17S)-NcoI-F and HBc149/HindIII-R are used to amplify the hybrid HBc gene from vector V2.Pf1. The resultant 546 bp fragment is cleaved with NcoI and HindIII and inserted into pKK-223-3N, which has been cleaved with the same two enzymes.

[0502] To make V2.Pf1[N-M2(17-24/C19S)), the oligonucleotides M2(17-24/C19S)-NcoI-F and HBc149/HindIII-R are used to amplify the hybrid HBc gene in vector V2.Pf1. The resultant 540 bp fragment is cleaved with NcoI and HindIII and inserted into pKK-223-3N, which had been cleaved with the same two enzymes.

29M2 (17-24/C17S) -NcoI-F M G S R C N D S S D I D P Y K E.GGCGCCATGGGGTCTAGATGTAACGATTCAAGTGACATCGACCCTTATAAAGAF GSEQ ID NO: 394ATTTCGSEQ ID NO: 395M2 (17-24/C19S) -NcoI-F M G C N D S S D I D P Y K E F GGCGCCATGGGGTGTAACGATTCAAGTGACATCGACCCTTATAAAGAATTTGGSEQ ID NO: 396SEQ ID NO: 397

Example 9

HBc Chimer Molecules With and Without Both N— and C-Terminal Cysteine Residues

[0503] A series of HBc chimer molecule-containing particles was prepared that contained residues 1-24 of the influenza A, M2 protein peptide-bonded at or near the N-terminus of HBc whose C-terminus was truncated at residue 149. The component chimeric protein molecules contained different N-terminal sequences that included an M2 sequence or variant, and some contained a C-terminal cysteine residue.

[0504] All purified particles listed in Table 9A-9C, hereinafter, were analyzed by analytical size exclusion chromatography to assess the retention of particulate structure following purification. Particles designated CV-1603, which contain no N-terminal cysteine residues, displayed evidence of disassembly back to sub-particulate structures because the protein eluted in the 1500 second range (particles elute at approximately 1000 seconds).

[0505] Similar analysis of particles CV-1590, which are similar to CV-1603 particles except for the mutation of two serine residues to cysteine residues in the native N-terminal M2 sequence, revealed that that construct remained particulate following purification, with elution occurring at around 1000 seconds, which is typical for a hybrid particle (FIG. 4). There was no evidence of disassembly for CV-1590 particles.

[0506] Analysis of CV-1560 particles, whose chimer protein also has two N-terminal cysteine residues, revealed that it too was particulate following purification, although it did exhibit some degree of disassembly, suggesting that the stabilization was not quite as robust as it was for CV-1590 particles. Comparison of the N-terminal configurations of CV-1590 and CV-1560 particles (Table 11, hereinafter), shows that the relative position of the two cysteine residues in CV-1560 particles is shifted by 3 amino acid residues relative to CV-1590 particles via the deletion of three amino acid residues (DEL), indicating that the cysteine residues may be required to be a minimal distance from the start of the core gene to enable optimal cross-linking.

Example 10

Particles with an M2 or M2 Variant Sequence and a C-Terminal Cysteine Residue

[0507] CV-1603 particles were shown in FIG. 4 to rapidly disassemble following purification. The HBc chimer molecules that comprise CV-1605 particles are similar to those of CV-1603 particles, except that the CV-1605 component chimer molecules have a single C-terminal stabilizing cysteine. A plasmid was made to direct the expression of CV-1605 particles to determine if the addition of a C-terminal cysteine residue to CV-1603 particles could impart greater stability on the particle. Following purification, CV-1605 particles were analyzed using analytical size exclusion chromatography.

[0508] The results of this study demonstrated that particle stabilization was more complete than for the CV-1603 particles, but incomplete compared to CV-1590 particles, which contain two amino-terminal cysteine residues and no C-terminal stabilizing cysteine. Although a significant amount of CV-1605 remained particulate, there was evidence of a heterogeneous mixture of sub-particulate structures that eluted over a broad range. These observations suggest that for this hybrid particle (CV-1603), C-terminal stabilization as found in CV-1605 particles was less complete than for the N-terminal stabilization found in CV-1590 particles.

[0509] To investigate the compatibility of combined amino and carboxyl-terminal cysteine stabilization of hybrid particles, an expression plasmid was constructed to direct the expression of CV-1604 particles. The component chimer molecules of CV-1604 particles contain both the two amino-terminal stabilizing cysteine residues present in a native M2 polypeptide sequence (as in CV-1590) as well as a C-terminal stabilizing cysteine (as in CV-1605 particles). Analysis of CV-1604 particles showed that they retained a homogeneous particulate state following purification, indicating that the two stabilizing methods are complementary and can be used in concert with each other.

[0510] Alternative linker sequences between the

[0511] N-terminus of HBc and the N-terminal cysteine residues were investigated using particles CV-1438 and CV-1492. Both of these particles contain the amino acid sequence ELLGWLWGIDI (SEQ ID NO:398) between the M2 fusion and amino acid D4 of HBc. Amino acid residues LGWLWGIDI are derived from amino acids −6 of pre-core to amino acid 13 of HBc, with the initiator codon of HBc deleted to prevent translation initiation from this position, which would compromise the study. The HB pre-core sequence includes a cysteine at position −7.

[0512] These particles differed only in the fact that the CV-1438 component chimer molecule terminated at position 149 of HBc, whereas the CV-1492 component chimer molecule terminated at 149 of HBc and contained a terminal cysteine at position 150 relative to the HBc of SEQ ID NO:1. When analyzed by analytical gel filtration, using an alternative but similar method to that discussed before, whereby particles elute at approximately 10 minutes, both constructs were shown to be particulate following purification. This study demonstrated the compatibility of amino- and carboxyl-terminal cysteine stabilization of truncated particles, and the tolerance of substantial variability in the amino acid sequence and distance between the N-terminal cysteine residues and start of the HBc gene.

30TABLE 9AResiduesBoundC-termConstructN-terminalHBc N-termBetween M2C-termNucleicCysteineNumberFusionStartand HBcEndAcidStabCV-1438M2 (2-24)D2ELLGWLWGI149NoNoCV-1492M2 (2-24)D2ELLGWLWGI149NoYes(C150)CV-1560M2 (1-24)D4None149NoNoCV-1590M2 (1-24)D4EL149NoNoCV-1603M2 (1-24)D4EL149NoNo(2C > 2S)CV-1604M2 (1-24)D4EL149NoYes(C150)CV-1605M2 (1-24)D4EL149NoYes(2C > 2S)(C150)CV-1606M2 (1-24)D4EL183YesYes(C183)CV-1607M2 (1-24)D4EL183YesYes(2C > 2S)(C183)CV-1671M2 (1-24)D4EL149NoNo(C17S)CV-1672M2 (1-24)D4EL149NoNo(C19S)CV-1816M2 (1-24)/D4EL149NoYesLE/M2(C150)(2-24)CV-1817M2 (1-24)D4EL149NoYes(2C > 2S)/LE/(C150)M2 (2-24)CV-1818M2 (1-24)D4EL149NoYes(2C > 2S)/(C150)LQ/M2 (2-24)(2C > 2S)/LE/M2 (2-24)

[0513]

31

TABLE 9B

5′/3′ Fusion

Bound
C-term

Construct

Flanking
C-term
Nucleic
Cysteine

Number
Loop Fusion
Sequence
End
Acid
Stab

CV-1440
M2 (2-24)
GI/EL
149
No
No

CV-1475
M2 (2-24)
GI/EL
149
No
Yes

(C150)

CV-1569
M2 (2-24)
GI/EL
149
No
Yes

(2C > 2S)

(C150)

CV-1586
M2 (2-24)
GI/EL
183
Yes
Yes

(C183)

CV-1587
M2 (2-24)
GI/EL
183
Yes
Yes

(2C > 2S)

(C183)

[0514]

32

TABLE 9C

Residues

HBc
Between
C-
Bound
C-term

Construct
C-terminal
C-term
M2 and
term
Nucleic
Cysteine

Number
Fusion
End
HBc
End
Acid
Stab

CV-1588
M2 (2-24)
V149
GI
(M2)
No
No

EL

[0515] Table 10, below, shows an alignment that illustrates the configuration of the N-termini of HBeAg, and particles harboring N-terminal fusions. Sequences are aligned according to amino acid residue position 4 from the N-terminus of HBc of SEQ ID NO:1 that is shared by all constructs. N-terminal cysteine residues, when present, are underlined.

33TABLE 10Construct NameSequenceSEQ ID NOHBeAgSKLCLGWLWGMDID399CV-1438/CV-1492MGISLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSDELLGWLWGIDID400CV-1560MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSD401CV-1590/CV-1604/CV-1606MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSDELD402CV-1603/CV-1605/CV-1607MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGSRSNDSSDELD403CV-1671MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGSRCNDSSDELD404CV-1672MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRSNDSSDELD405CV-1816MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSDLESLLTEVET-406PIRNEWGCRCNDSSDELDCV-1817MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGSRSNDSSDLESLLTEVET-407PIRNEWGCRCNDSSDELDCV-1818MSLLTEVETPIRNEWGSRSNDSSDLQSLLTEVET-408PIRNEWGSRSNDSSDLESLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSDELD

[0516] Table 11, below, provides a tabulation of the results in which stability was assessed for particles containing an N-terminal influenza A M2 sequence or variant contemplated herein. As is seen, stable particles have been prepared from HBc chimer molecules that contain an N-terminal cysteine residue at a position of minus 14 (−14) relative to the N-terminus of the HBc sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 to about the N-terminus itself.

34TABLE 11Amino AcidsBetweenHBc D4and N-terminalCysteineC-terminalStableConstructResiduesCysteineParticleNameCys 1Cys 2StabilizationFormedHBeAg—9NoNoCV-14381816NoYesCV-14921816YesYesCV-156064NoYesCV-159097NoYesCV-1603——NoNoCV-160497YesYesCV-1605——YesYes/NoCV-1607——YesYesCV-1671—7NoYesCV-16729—NoYesCV-181797YesYesCV-181897YesYesCV-1901a34b/932b/7YesYesaA particle whose cysteines at 48 and 107 were changed to serines. bCounted from the second N-terminal M2 copy.

Example 11

Antigenicity of Various M2-Containing Particles

[0517] The antigenicity of the various particles to the monoclonal antibody 14C2 was examined using an ELISA. To ensure retention of particles in their native conformation, ELISA plates were first coated with a polyclonal antibody (rabbit) to capture the particles, which were then probed with various dilutions of either the 14C2 monoclonal antibody, or anti-HBc monoclonal antibodies with specificity for the immunodominant loop region of HBc particles. The data, presented in the table below, demonstrate that presentation of M2e in the immunodominant loop of HBc does not significantly alter the accessibility of the M2e epitope for the 14C2 monoclonal antibody, relative to presentation at the N-terminus (IM2HBc/CV-1559 and CV-1604). These observations were not surprising because it has previously been shown that 14C2 binds to an internal region of M2e (amino acids 8, 10, 11, and 14 of M2, as opposed to binding the N-terminus [Zebedee et al., (1988) J. Virol., 62(8):2762-2772].

[0518] In addition, all particles, with the exception of CV-1569, retained antigenicity to anti-HBc monoclonal antibodies 3105. The loss of recognition by 3105 is a previously observed phenomenon for particles with sequences inserted into the immunodominant loop, and this typically translates to reduced anti-HBc responses for these particles following immunization. Monoclonal antibodies 3105 were purchased from the Institute of Immunology, Tokyo, Japan.

35MonoclonalAntibodyParticle14C23105CV-1123−+IM2HBc/++CV-1559CV-1604++CV-1569+−

Example 12

Antibody Subclass and Protection

[0519] A summary of several studies in which various M2e-HBc constructs (10 μg/mouse) and various adjuvants were assayed. About one-half were i.p. administration and about one-half i.n. For each group (14 mice) the sera were pooled and the titer of anti-M2e IgG subclass antibodies was determined. The results are from sera taken one week after the second boost. For mice where the IgG2a titer was more than 104, the IgG2A titer was 104 (*).

36Number ofPercentIgG2aGroupsProtection 104 8100<104*470-95

[0520] Adjuvants are increasingly being investigated for their ability to enhance the magnitude and persistence of immune responses to vaccines, as well as modulate the Th1/Th2 bias of the immune response. Although many experimental adjuvants are under investigation, alum remains the only adjuvant that is a component of FDA-approved vaccines in the US. Typically, alum biases immune responses towards a Th2 type, which is manifested by the production of high levels of IgG1 antibody in mice.

[0521] It is found that alum-formulated M2e-HBc particles do elicit a significant IgG1 response; however, IgG2a and IgG2b antibodies, which are Th1 indicators, are also elicited. In an attempt to enhance the production of Th1-type IgG subclasses, the immunogenicity of Alhydrogel™-formulated particles supplemented with RC529, a synthetic derivative of MPL developed by Corixa Corporation, was tested in mice. These studies revealed that inclusion of RC529 in the Alhydrogel™ formulation resulted in a dramatic enhancement of anti-M2e IgG2a titers, increasing the anti-M2e IgG2a:IgG1 ratio by approximately 10-fold. All mice in both groups were completely protected from lethal challenge; however, there was an indication of reduced morbidity (temperature decrease and weight loss) in mice immunized with CV-1569 formulated with Alhydrogel™+RC529, versus Alhydrogel™ alone.

Example 13

Particle Assembly of Chosen Chimers

[0522] Analysis of size exclusion chromatography elution profiles revealed that four of the five predicted cysteine mutation chimers successfully assembled into particles. To confirm that mutation of C48 and C107 to serines had no affect on particle assembly, HBc149 and HBc149(C48S/C107S) were included, as well as the C-terminal cysteine harboring pair, HBc149+C and HBc149(C48S/C107S)+C. Inclusion of these constructs was also necessary for comparison of stability of the particles, as well as for determining the extent of disulfide bonding in the mutated particles.

[0523] All expressed particles were purified and final yields tabulated, hereinafter. Particle yields were generally very high, relative to non-engineered HBc149, which suggests that the introduced mutations did not greatly impact particle assembly. Due to the high success in producing the first round of particles, all of the chimers were similarly modified to accept heterologous loop inserts, with the exception of the failed particle HBc149(C48S/C107S) L55C/H104C+C.

37TABLE 12Purified Protein Yields of ChimersHarboring Cysteine MutationsParticle YieldFollowingCL-4BFinalTreatment*YieldChimer Name(total AU)(mg)HBc14910919HBc149(C48S/C107S)9412HBc149 + C11713HBc149(C48S/C107S) + C10514HBc149(C48S/C107S)L55C/H104C + CNANAHBc149(C48S/C107S)A58C/L100C + C8715HBc149(C48S/C107S)A69C/V89C + C15028HBc149(C48S/C107S)W62C/F97C + C5913HBc149(C48S/C107S)L76C/R82C + C10010*Particles are typically more than 75% pure at this stage. NA = No assembly.

[0524] It was determined that approximately 2 mg of each chimer were required for characterization studies, so, in most cases, a maximum of about 50 AU (25 mg of semi-pure protein) were applied to the anion exchange column to avoid overloading. The final purified protein yields, therefore, represent predicted yields based upon the amount of material discarded following the HA chromatography step.

Example 14

Characterization of Assembled Particles

[0525] Disulfide bond formation was found to be a function of time and temperature. Analysis of each engineered particle in its native conformation by analytical size exclusion chromatography revealed no difference between particle integrity over a two week stability study conducted at 4° C., room temperature, and 37° C. and analyzed on days zero, 3, 7, and 14. For simplicity, only profiles for days zero and 14 at 37° C. (the most severe conditions) are noted, as all elution profiles for a given particle were substantially identical. The two control particles lacking C-terminal cysteines, HBc149 and HBc149(C48S/C107S), did not entirely retain their particulate structure, their elution profiles revealing distinct populations of lower order structures.

[0526] Further analysis of the cross-linking of particles was assessed by determining the ability of the particles/protein to migrate into non-reducing SDS-PAGE gels. Disulfide bonding was shown to be incomplete in most particles, including controls, at day zero and remained incomplete at 4° C. for the duration of the study. Incubation at room temperature enhanced disulfide bonding, as determined by the reduction in intensity of monomer and dimer bands with a corresponding increase in the appearance of higher order multimers.

[0527] Significantly, all particles (except non-C-terminally stabilized controls) that were incubated at 37° C. were entirely disulfide bonded after a period of 7 days. Of particular note was the fact that the C-terminally stabilized C48S/C107S chimer appeared to be entirely disulfide bonded at day zero, whereas its C48/C107 counterpart was not and did not reach the same level of cross-linking achieved by the C48S/C107S chimers during the period of study. Additionally, the engineered particle HBc149(C48S/C107S)W62C/F97C+C exhibited the same high level of cross-linking at day zero.

[0528] Reducing SDS-PAGE gels of all samples revealed no significant change in the intensity of monomers from the start to the finish of the stability study, indicating that all monomers remained intact over all temperatures, as illustrated by comparison of samples taken on day zero and day 14 at 37° C. gels. Importantly, these observations confirm that the reduction in monomer and dimer intensity over time for selected chimers analyzed under non-reducing conditions was not due to degradation of the monomers.

[0529] The presence of free thiols was measured for all particles at all time points in the stability study to establish the degree of disulfide bond formation. Although free thiols react with Ellman's reagent, those involved in disulfide bonds do not. The results of these studies demonstrate that the presence of free thiols decreased over time and was accelerated for the samples incubated at 37° C., relative to those incubated at room temperature and 4° C. These observations are consistent with those made for the analysis of particles using non-reducing SDS-PAGE gels, whereby the migration of constructs decreased commensurate with decreased levels of free thiols.

[0530] Consistent with the observations of Zheng et al, above, the two control particles containing wild type C48 and C107 exhibited the presence of free thiols at all times and temperatures, confirming that these cysteine residues remain largely in the reduced state. In corresponding particles where those cysteines were mutated to serines, free thiol reactivity was abolished, again attesting to the fact that C61 and C150 are entirely disulfide bonded. Although engineered particles were not entirely cross-linked at the end of the purification regimen, as evidenced by the presence of free monomers and dimers on non-reducing SDS-PAGE gels, all had barely detectable levels of free thiols by day 7 at 37° C.

[0531] These data were encouraging, and the computer modeling used to predict putative disulfide bond-forming residues had been very successful, but not completely predictive. Loop stability, however, was difficult to predict in this manner and so the suite of epitope-carrying vectors was created.

[0532] It should be noted, first, that all C48S/C107S epitope-carrying particles behaved in a manner similar to their wild type counterparts, signifying that these mutations did not affect particle assembly. The β-amyloid epitope, which failed to assemble into a stable particle in non-disulfide engineered particles, also failed in all four cysteine-engineered vectors, indicating an inability of the cysteines bridging the immunodominant loop to retain the monomer in its desired conformation. The ASP-1 epitope behaved similarly in engineered vectors, although the control vectors with no added cysteines produced low levels of assembled particle. The anthrax epitope, PA, which failed in control particles, actually did produce low levels of assembled particle in the A58C/L100C vector, but no others. Finally, the influenza epitope, which yields high levels of assembled HBc in control vectors, produced moderate levels of assembled vectors in two of the four engineered particles, the L76C/R82C chimer and the W62C/F97C chimer. A summary of the particle yields of all chimers is shown in Table 13 below. Successfully assembled particles are in bold.

38TABLE 13Purified Protein Yields of Epitope-Carrying Chimers*ParticleYieldAfter CL-4BFinalChimerTreatment*YieldNumberChimer Name(total AU)(mg)1510V16.β-AmNo assemblyNo assembly1794V16(C48S/C107S).β-AmNo assemblyNo assembly1797A58C/L100C.β-AmNo assemblyNo assembly1796A69C/V89C.β-AmNo assemblyNo assembly1798W62C/F97C.β-AmNo assemblyNo assembly1795L76C/R82C.β-AmNo assemblyNo assembly1546V16.ASP-1 48 4.91775V16(C48S/C107S).ASP-1 50 5.11778A58C/L100C.ASP-1No assemblyNo assembly1777A69C/V89C.ASP-1No assemblyNo assembly1779W62C/F97C.ASP-1No assemblyNo assembly1776L76C/R82C.ASP-1No assemblyNo assembly1629V16.PANo assemblyNo assembly1780V16(C48S/C107S).PANo assemblyNo assembly1783A58C/L100C.PA 52 5.01782A69C/V89C.PANo assemblyNo assembly1784W62C/F97C.PANo assemblyNo assembly1781L76C/R82C.PANo assemblyNo assembly1569V16.IA(M2)2C/2S11011.21789V16(C48S/C107S).IA(M2)2C/2S 77 0.41792A58C/L100C.IA(M2)2C/2SNo assemblyNo assembly1791A69C/V89C.IA(M2)2C/2SNo assemblyNo assembly1793W62C/F97C.IA(M2)2C/2S 46 8.21790L76C/R82C.IA(M2)2C/2S 44 1.6*Particles are typically more than 75% pure at this stage. “HBc149(C48S/C107S) +C” has been omitted from disulfide-engineered particle names for simplicity.

[0533] No particle expressed as well as the original V16.1A(M2)2C/2S clone (chimer CV-1569), although the C48S/C107S version exhibited similar expression levels. When purified, however, the C48S/C107S version yielded less than a milligram of material, a tenth of the purified material recovered from the original clone, indicating that a different method of purification may be necessary for this type of chimer. In purification, the particles seemed to bind tightly to the hypatite column and recovery from this column was only 10% of what was loaded, where other particles made in this study were recovered at 60%, or higher.

[0534] Because the influenza set of particles was the most complete, this was the only set of particles set up for stability studies. Although the purifications did not appear to be optimal (recovery of two of the four particles was very low), the material was incubated at 37° C. (to facilitate disulfide bonding, as found previously) and the same analytical methods used for the initial stability study were employed to characterize these particles. Originally, the study was set up to run for two weeks, as described previously, but samples collected at zero, 3, and 7 days were sufficient to see a pattern.

[0535] Although particles exhibited typical disulfide bonding on non-reducing gels at day zero, analysis of the four particles revealed a distinct cleaved monomer band in all engineered particles. The control particle, V16.1A(M2)2C/2S, exhibited no cleavage, although this was the only lot to remain intact—all others (five lots) showed the same cleaving pattern (data not shown). Incubation for three days revealed complete degradation of the monomer in the V16(C48S/C107S) chimer and the L76C/R82C chimer and a definite increase of cleaved product in the W62C/F97C chimer, although these native particles remained intact. Native particle analysis via analytical size exclusion chromatography, did, however, show that the purified V16(C48S/C107S) chimer was not an assembled particle, perhaps due to the extremely low purified yield—it is likely that formed particles were not efficiently eluted off the purification columns. The degradation trend of all particles continued through day 7, when the stability study was terminated.

[0536] In recent work with the IA(M2)2C/2S epitope, it has been found that, when displayed in the loop, this epitope is prone to cleavage. Thus, N-terminal sequencing revealed fragments cut roughly in half, cleaving at a site within the inserted epitope. It is therefore thought that monomers would cleave, regardless of loop stabilization simply due to the nature of the particular epitope. Further exploration of loop stability with other epitopes is underway.

Example 15

HBc Proteins CV-1843 and CV-1842 Control

[0537] An HBC carrier was designed and constructed to permit one or two conjugation events per protein monomer. Conjugation chemistries particularly contemplated herein link a saccharide, peptide, lipid or glycolipid to a primary amine. Carrier protein CV-1843 contains only a single lysine residue and that residue is an added lysine that is present at HBc position 77 in the HBc immunodominant loop. Studies with a lysine minus mutant, CV-1842, have shown that certain haptens (particularly peptides) can be conjugated to the N-terminus whereas an oligosaccharide, diacyl-LOS, cannot. The difference is probably due to the difference in geometry and/or hydrophilicity of the hapten types. This particular synthesis does not involve the addition of a helper T cell epitope, although a helper T cell epitope can be conjugated to the carrier or expressed therewith as a fusion protein.

[0538] Thus, the CV-1843 protein contains four mutations of amino acids on HBc core at position 7 by replacing lysine codon AAA with arginine codon (CGC), position 97 by replacing lysine codon AAG with arginine codon AGG and at positions 48 and 107 by replacing cysteine codons (TGT) with serine codons TCT. One insertion of a lysine codon was made between amino acids L76 and E77 of the HBc gene. The above site-directed mutagenesis was completed by using the starting plasmid CV-1123 with QuickChange™ XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit from Stratagene.

[0539] Two oligonucleotide primers were used for each mutation or insertion. One primer is the complementary strand of the other. Oligonucleotide primers for all mutagenesis reactions were designed in such a way that a mutation codon was present with 16 to 20 nucleotides of flanking sequence on either side of the codon, with G or C as the proximal nucleotide [closest to the site of the mutation]. Pfu Turbo™ DNA polymerase was used in mutagenic PCR and Dpn I was used to digest the parental DNA plasmid.

[0540] The primer sets used are set out below, wherein the original residue at a given position is noted first in single letter designation, followed by the position number of the replacement, and then the single letter designation for the replacement residue. The primers for insertion of a lysine (K) at position 77 contained no original or replacement residues as a single residue was inserted at that position.

39Primers for Position 7K7R-ForwardCCATGGACATCGACCCTTATCGCGAATTTGGAGCTACTGTGGAGSEQ ID NO: 440K7R-RerverseCTCCACAGTAGCTCCAAATTCGCGATAAGGGTCGATGTCCATGGSEQ ID No: 441Primers for Position 97K97R-ForwardCACTAATATGGGCCTAAGGTTCAGGCAACTCTTGTGGSEQ ID No: 442K97R-ReverseCCACAAGAGTTGCCTGAACCTTAGGCCCATATTAGTGSEQ ID No: 443Primers for Position 48C48S-ForwardGCCTTAGAGTCTCCTGAGCATTGTTCACCTCACCATACTGCSEQ ID No: 444C48S-ReverseGCAGTATGGTGAGGTGAAGAATGCTCAGGAGACTCTAAGGCSEQ ID No: 445Primers for Position 107C107S-ForwardGGCAACTCTTGTGGTTTCACATTTCTTGTCTCACTTTTGGAAGAGSEQ ID No: 446C107S-ReverseCTCTTCCAAAAGTGAGAGAAGAAATGTGAAACCACAAGAGTTGCCSEQ ID No: 447Primers for Lysine Insertion at Position 77K77-ForwardCCTGGGTGGGTGTTAATTTGAAAGAAGATCCAGCGTCTAGAGSEQ ID No: 448K77-ReverseCTCTAGACGCTGGATCTTCTTTCAAATTAACACCCACCCAGGSEQ ID No: 449

[0541] The CV-1842 protein particle vector was constructed in the same way as the vector for formation of CV-1843 protein particles. The CV-1842 protein contains the same four mutations as CV-1843 at position 7, 97, 48 and 107. However, the CV-1842 protein does not contain the lysine insertion at position 77. The CV-1842 protein particles serve as a control particle for CV-1843 in conjugation when using lysine as the functional group.

[0542] The recombinant plasmids were grown in E. coli BLR, induced with 0.5 mM IPTG, and grown overnight (about 18 hours). The cells were harvested by centrifugation and lysed by microfluidization. The soluble material was ammonium sulfate precipitated twice and loaded on a Sepharose CL-4B column (Amersham). The second peak eluted from the column was loaded on a ceramic hydroxyapatite column, eluted and reprecipitated in ammonium sulfate. The protein was resuspended in water and dialyzed into 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer. (pH 6.8) for analysis and conjugation.

Example 16

dLOS Conjugation to CV-1843 and CV-1123 Proteins

[0543] The CV-1843 protein and CV-1123 protein were used for the following study. Adipic acid dihydrazide-(ADH-) derivitized 9274 dLOS was provided by Dr. Xin-Xing Gu of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda Md. and was separately conjugated to each type of HBc by each of two methods. The first chemistry was direct, carbodiimide linkage to acidic residues on CV-1123. The second was linkage to the lysines at positions 7, 77 and 97 using ADH-derivitized-succinimidyl 3-[2-pyridyldithio]propionamido(SPDP)-N-[γ-maleimidobutyryloxy]succinimide ester (GMBS) prepared according to the distributor's instructions.

[0544] Thus, ADH-derivitized dLOS was reacted with N-succinimidyl-3-[2-pyridyldithio]propionate (SPDP) to form the mixed disulfide, and N-[γ-maleimido-butyryloxylsuccinimide ester (GMBS) was reacted with the N-terminal amine or ε-amino lysine of the HBc protein to form an HBc-derivatized succinimido ester. Reaction of the SPDP mixed disulfide with dithiothreitol (DTT) followed by dialysis provided the 3-thiopropionhydrazido-dLOS derivative that was reacted with the HBc-derivatized succinimido ester to form desired conjugate.

[0545] The conjugates prepared above were used to immunize mice (5 per group) either using a saline solution or saline plus a pre-adsorption of the conjugate on to alum. Mice were immunized three times, three weeks apart, and the titers shown are two weeks after the final boost. Each dose contained 5 μg of carbohydrate. ELISA conditions were taken from [Sun. et. al. (2000) Vaccine 2000 18(13):1264-1272]. The only antibody class to show preexisting titers were IgM. Titers were boosted one log with all of the constructs.

[0546] IgG2b titers were significantly lower when the vaccine was adsorbed to alum. This can be due to the deacylation or hydrolysis of the carbohydrates [Sturgess et. al. (1999) Vaccine, 17(9-10):1169-1178]. None of the mice showed measurable titers to IgG2a. IgG1 induction, characteristic of a Th2 response, was slowed with immunization by the longer cross-linker on HBc, but it eventually rose to the same level as the rest of the animals. IgG3 levels were comparable.

Example 17

Peptide Conjugation to Particles Prepared from CV-1843 and CV-1842 Proteins

[0547] A peptide was conjugated to particles prepared from the CV-1843 and CV-1842 proteins. The peptide had the amino acid sequence SLLTEVETPIRNEWGCRCNDSSD (SEQ ID NO:450) and was conjugated using the linker N-(γ-maleimidobutyryloxy]-sulfosuccinimide ester (sulfo-GMBS, Pierce Chemical Co.). After optimization, the results of the conjugation showed binding to the desired lysine and also to the amino-terminus as discussed below.

[0548] Thus, silver-stained reducing SDS PAGE analysis for particles prepared from CV-1843 protein showed a monomer band of completely reduced HBc polypeptide chain at about 22,000 daltons, a one repeat (one peptide addition) band above it and a two repeat (two peptide additions) band above the one repeat band. At the region of approximately 44,000 daltons, there was again a primary band and two conjugate bands. For particles prepared from CV-1842 proteins, monomer and dimer bands were present as were bands for monomer and dimer plus a single polypeptide. Thus, the peptide was conjugated to both the added lysine at position 77 and the N-terminus for the particles prepared from the CV-1843 protein, but the peptide was only conjugated to the N-terminus for the particles prepared from the CV-1842 particles that had no lysines residues. Monomer and dimer refer to the inability to completely reduce and separate the two 22,000 dalton monomers after conjugation. These results show clearly that the purified particles are capable of having peptides chemically conjugated to them.

[0549] Each of the patents and articles cited herein is incorporated by reference. The use of the article “a” or “an” is intended to include one or more.

[0550] The foregoing description and the examples are intended as illustrative and are not to be taken as limiting. Still other variations within the spirit and scope of this invention are possible and will readily present themselves to those skilled in the art.

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	10274616	Oct 2002	US
Child	10732862	Dec 2003	US
Parent	10080299	Feb 2002	US
Child	10274616	Oct 2002	US
Parent	10082014	Feb 2002	US
Child	10274616	Oct 2002	US

Stabilized immunogenic HBc chimer particles

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

CPC

US Classifications

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

Provisional Applications (1)

Continuation in Parts (3)