Not applicable.
Concrete building foundations are a normal part of modern society. In particular, concrete foundations are strong and because the concrete is a liquid before curing, the shapes that need to be formed are easily achievable when compared to stone or wood, which needs to be shaped by removing unnecessary material. In addition, the whole foundation can be a single solid unit, so there are not joints that can slip or move. Finally, concrete foundations are generally stronger than many of the widely accepted alternatives.
However, there are also drawbacks to concrete and other types of foundations. First, the materials are heavy, which means that transportation to the site of installation is expensive. In the case of concrete, the transportation has to be done by a specialty truck because the concrete has to be continually mixed or it will begin curing. This also means that the delivery range is limited and has to be scheduled within a short window of time, or else the concrete becomes unusable.
Second, concrete installation is faster than stone, but still takes time, which cannot be reduced. Concrete has to be formed, poured, cured, cleaned up and finished and those each take time to complete. That is time that other things cannot be done during building of a structure. I.e., walls and flooring can't be placed on the foundation until the concrete is completely cured. This means that the placement of a foundation from beginning to end takes at least 1-2 work weeks before other work can begin.
Third, the installation is highly specialized. Concrete pouring and finishing requires experience and so replacement workers can be difficult to find, especially when they are needed quickly. Indeed, some specialization is so specific, that other concrete workers aren't qualified. For example, the workers who create footings for a structure, do only that and don't do a foundation and vice versa.
All of these add up to concrete foundations being expensive and time consuming. While other materials may be faster, cheaper and stronger, concrete achieves a balance of all three and that is why it has become so universally accepted. However, this does not mean that there are not better alternatives.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for foundations which require less specialization, which can be installed quicker, which can be cheaper and which are stronger.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential characteristics of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
One example embodiment includes a steel and foam foundation. The steel and foam foundation includes a main body, where the main body is formed of EPS foam and a sloped exterior. The sloped exterior is formed of EPS foam on an exterior surface of the main body and ensures that the bottom of the steel and foam foundation is wider than the top of the steel and foam foundation. The steel and foam foundation includes a first I-beam and a second I-beam. The first and second I-beams include a web, a first flange, and a second flange. A first edge of the main body is placed along the web of the first I-beam and a second edge of the main body is placed along the web of the second I-beam, where the second edge is opposite the first edge. The steel and foam foundation also includes a first piece of L-metal, a second piece of L-metal, a third piece of L-metal, and a fourth piece of L-metal. Each piece of L-metal includes a first flange and a second flange. The first piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the exterior surface and the second flange on a third edge of the main body where the third edge extends between the first edge and the second edge. The first flange of the first piece of L-metal partially overlaps the first flange of the first I-beam and the first flange of the second I-beam. The second piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on an interior surface of the main body and the second flange on the third edge of the main body where the interior surface is opposite the exterior surface. The first flange of the second piece of L-metal partially overlaps the second flange of the first I-beam and the second flange of the second I-beam. The third piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the exterior surface and the second flange on a fourth edge of the main body. The fourth edge extends between the first edge and the second edge and is opposite the third edge. The first flange of the third piece of L-metal partially overlaps the first flange of the first I-beam and the first flange of the second I-beam. The fourth piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the interior surface and the second flange on the fourth edge of the main body. The first flange of the fourth piece of L-metal partially overlaps the second flange of the first I-beam and the second flange of the second I-beam.
Another example embodiment includes a structure. The structure includes a steel and foam foundation. The steel and foam foundation includes a main body, where the main body is formed of EPS foam and a sloped exterior. The sloped exterior is formed of EPS foam on an exterior surface of the main body and ensures that the bottom of the steel and foam foundation is wider than the top of the steel and foam foundation. The steel and foam foundation includes a first I-beam and a second I-beam. The first and second I-beams include a web, a first flange, and a second flange. A first edge of the main body is placed along the web of the first I-beam and a second edge of the main body is placed along the web of the second I-beam, where the second edge is opposite the first edge. The steel and foam foundation also includes a first piece of L-metal, a second piece of L-metal, a third piece of L-metal, and a fourth piece of L-metal. Each piece of L-metal includes a first flange and a second flange. The first piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the exterior surface and the second flange on a third edge of the main body where the third edge extends between the first edge and the second edge. The first flange of the first piece of L-metal partially overlaps the first flange of the first I-beam and the first flange of the second I-beam. The second piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on an interior surface of the main body and the second flange on the third edge of the main body where the interior surface is opposite the exterior surface. The first flange of the second piece of L-metal partially overlaps the second flange of the first I-beam and the second flange of the second I-beam. The third piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the exterior surface and the second flange on a fourth edge of the main body. The fourth edge extends between the first edge and the second edge and is opposite the third edge. The first flange of the third piece of L-metal partially overlaps the first flange of the first I-beam and the first flange of the second I-beam. The fourth piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the interior surface and the second flange on the fourth edge of the main body. The first flange of the fourth piece of L-metal partially overlaps the second flange of the first I-beam and the second flange of the second I-beam. The structure also includes a footing, where the steel and foam foundation is attached to the footing.
Another example embodiment includes a structure. The structure includes a steel and foam foundation. The steel and foam foundation includes a main body, where the main body is formed of EPS foam and a sloped exterior. The sloped exterior is formed of EPS foam on an exterior surface of the main body and ensures that the bottom of the steel and foam foundation is wider than the top of the steel and foam foundation. The steel and foam foundation includes a first I-beam and a second I-beam. The first and second I-beams include a web, a first flange, and a second flange. A first edge of the main body is placed along the web of the first I-beam and a second edge of the main body is placed along the web of the second I-beam, where the second edge is opposite the first edge. The steel and foam foundation also includes a first piece of L-metal, a second piece of L-metal, a third piece of L-metal, and a fourth piece of L-metal. Each piece of L-metal includes a first flange and a second flange. The first piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the exterior surface and the second flange on a third edge of the main body where the third edge extends between the first edge and the second edge. The first flange of the first piece of L-metal partially overlaps the first flange of the first I-beam and the first flange of the second I-beam. The second piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on an interior surface of the main body and the second flange on the third edge of the main body where the interior surface is opposite the exterior surface. The first flange of the second piece of L-metal partially overlaps the second flange of the first I-beam and the second flange of the second I-beam. The third piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the exterior surface and the second flange on a fourth edge of the main body. The fourth edge extends between the first edge and the second edge and is opposite the third edge. The first flange of the third piece of L-metal partially overlaps the first flange of the first I-beam and the first flange of the second I-beam. The fourth piece of L-metal is placed with the first flange on the interior surface and the second flange on the fourth edge of the main body. The first flange of the fourth piece of L-metal partially overlaps the second flange of the first I-beam and the second flange of the second I-beam. The structure also includes a footing, where the steel and foam foundation is attached to the footing. The structure further includes a floor panel placed on top of the third edge of the main body and attached to the first piece of L-metal and the second piece of L-metal. The structure additionally includes waterproofing, where the waterproofing is applied to at least the sloped exterior. The structure moreover an exterior wall, the exterior wall placed on top of the floor panel. The structure also includes an exterior finish, where the exterior finish covers a portion of the main body, the first flange of the first I-beam, the first flange of the second I-beam, the first flange of the first piece of L-metal, a portion of the floor panel and a portion of the exterior wall.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
To further clarify various aspects of some example embodiments of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only illustrated embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Reference will now be made to the figures wherein like structures will be provided with like reference designations. It is understood that the figures are diagrammatic and schematic representations of some embodiments of the invention, and are not limiting of the present invention, nor are they necessarily drawn to scale.
The steel and foam foundation 100 includes a number of benefits relative to concrete foundations (which were, in turn, a vast improvement over previous foundations, such as stone and mortar). The steel and foam foundation 100 is cheaper than a concrete foundation. For instance, the steel and foam foundation 100 can be a cost reduction of 25-50% relative to a concrete foundation. By way of example, in a typical home with a basement the size of the foundation can be (lets put an example here—I would like some dimensions, total material and approximate cost—for example, it could say “the foundation can be 12” wide, 8′ tall and 100 linear feet. This would require 29.6 cubic feet of concrete. At a cost of $119-$147 per cubic yard, the total cost of this example foundation would be roughly $3,500-$4,500—obviously, these numbers are just made up so put in something that is realistic. In contrast, the steel and foam foundation 100 for the same structure would be roughly (put a number here matching the material cost for the steel and foam foundation that would replace the above concrete foundation—the bigger the contrast here, the better, but keep in reasonable. So if you think the same foundation could be $1,500-$2,000 then be honest and put that here). As an additional example (we can do the same thing for a shorter foundation for a building without a basement if you would like).
Another benefit of the steel and foam foundation 100 relative to a concrete foundation is strength. The steel and foam foundation 100 is about 3 times the strength of an equivalent concrete foundation. Under testing the steel and foam foundation 100 using gauge steel and 2 lb density foam (if you think any other factors are relevant, feel free to put here—dimensions might be helpful if that changes the test results) withstood a downward pressure of 20,510 psi (the label says 20,510 pounds down pressure so I wasn't sure whether that was 20,510 lbs total or 20,510 psi, so I guessed and put that here) where the test is conducted applying a pressure and removing all pressure (i.e., the test ends) when any portion of the test material fails. The same test puts the strength of a concrete foundation at 7,000 psi. This equates to an roughly three-fold strength increase of the steel and foam foundation 100 relative to a concrete foundation.
An additional benefit of the steel and foam foundation 100 relative to a concrete foundation is speed of construction/installation. Installation of a concrete foundation is much more time and space intensive relative to the steel and foam foundation 100. Construction of a concrete foundation takes several days under normal conditions. The usual process is as follows. First forms for the concrete pour are prepared. This is often done 2-3 days prior to the day of the concrete pour to ensure that if any problems are encountered, they can be corrected prior to the arrival of the concrete. The forms are slabs that are attached to one another or flat materials (such as plywood) that can be secured to one another. This forms a space into which the concrete is poured and the forms are left until the concrete has at least partially cured (the internal portions need not be cured for forms to be removed). Because the forms need to be supported, the trench for the foundation often must be made wide enough for a worker and supports to have space on the outside of the forms. Concrete is then delivered in specialized cement trucks and placed into the forms. After curing is complete (or complete enough) the forms are removed leaving the concrete foundation. The forms are then removed from the site. This whole process can be completed in 3-5 work days under ideal conditions, but in practice often takes 7-10 work days or more (for example, if a freeze happens then additional time must be given as concrete will not cure at temperature below freezing).
In contrast, the steel and foam foundation 100 requires less time and less space dug around the foundation. The steel and foam foundation 100 is delivered in pieces that are assembled on site. Thus, the only materials that have to be present are the steel and foam foundation 100 itself. While this can, in theory, be done for a concrete foundation the reality is that doing so would require cranes and other equipment which makes such an installation more expensive and less practical, so it is rarely done in practice. Each section of the steel and foam foundation 100 comes numbered so that assembly proceeds by placing the correct portion of the steel and foam foundation 100 and securing to the footings (described below). Because the steel and foam foundation 100 sections are light enough to be manipulated by hand, they can be placed and secured in a relatively short amount of time. A home with a basement can have the entire foundation assembled and installed within a single day and this installation time is not affected by the weather. This is a significant time savings compared to a concrete foundation. In addition, although space would normally be given for a worker to access the outside of the steel and foam foundation 100, this space is much less (about half the width—not sure if this is accurate, but it seemed about right) that would be required for a concrete foundation which needs to accommodate workers and braces for the forms. Less space needed for the foundation translates to less time and cost of digging the foundation and less time and cost for backfilling.
Moreover, the transportation time and costs for the steel and foam foundation 100 is significantly reduced relative to the transportation time and costs of a concrete foundation. Transportation of concrete requires a cement truck (which constantly mixes the concrete to slow curing) and is distance limited. Beyond a certain distance (should put in the distance here—can change to delivery time if needed), concrete cannot be transported premixed, or it will cure before delivery. Beyond that distance one of two options must be utilized. Either the dry concrete is delivered and then mixed in a cement truck on site, or (in harder to reach areas, such as sites with poor access) the dry concrete has to be mixed by hand. Both options dramatically increase the cost and the time required for the concrete pour (some numbers here would be great). In contrast, the steel and foam foundation 100 can be delivered by a variety of means. Usually, this would be accomplished on a flat bed truck but can be done using pickup trucks or trailers if access is poor. Indeed, the weight of each portion of the individual steel and foam foundation 100 is low enough that it could be delivered on something as small as an ATV if required.
A further benefit is that backfilling can occur much faster with the steel and concrete 100 foundation. For example, when a concrete pour is completely finished (day 1) it is usually left overnight. The following day (day 2), forms are removed and then taken off the site. The day after that (day 3) asphalt or other waterproofing is applied to any areas that will be backfilled. Finally, after allowing the asphalt to dry (not sure if this is the correct term) (usually overnight, so on day 4) backfill is placed in the area surrounding the foundation. Thus, this process takes four days or more once the concrete is poured. In contrast, the steel and concrete foundation can be installed and asphalt applied on the same day. Then the next day backfill can be placed in the area surrounding the foundation (which is smaller than required for a concrete foundation, as described above). Thus, backfilling begins within 1-2 days vs 3-4 days and is less labor intensive (as materials such as forms do not have to be removed from the site).
One of skill in the art will appreciate that one advantage of EPS includes the ability to add dyes. I.e., the EPS can be dyed to make it any desired color. This allows the material to be customized as desired by a user and provide a desired look. The number of colors available in EPS is extremely high. In contrast, the number of colors that can be created in concrete is highly limited and, therefore, other looks are created with paint placed on the outside of the concrete.
Further the sloped exterior 104 prevents water from draining along the main body 102. That is, the sloped exterior ensures that the exterior never slopes inward in such that water which is in the soil never drains into a cavity formed by the steel and foam foundation 100 and an underlying structure (such as a footing, described below). This prevents water damage and allows the structure to resist water damage for as long as possible. Therefore, the sloped exterior 104 is also critical to prevent water damage. To create the proper pressure direction and water drainage, the slope of the sloped exterior 104 should be between 4.5 and 7.5 inches over 10 feet (i.e., if the height of the sloped exterior 104 is 10 feet then the base of the sloped exterior is between 4.5 and 7.5 inches but if the height of the sloped exterior 104 is 5 feet then the base of the sloped exterior is between 2.25 and 3.75 inches). For example, the slope of the sloped exterior 104 can be approximately 6 inches over 10 feet. As used in the specification and the claims, the term approximately shall mean that the value is within 10% of the stated value, unless otherwise specified.
The sloped exterior 104 is configured to go roughly to the ground line. I.e., the sloped exterior 104 ends not at the top of the main body 102 but instead wherever the soil will be backfilled along the foundation wall. This keeps the exterior of the structure looking clean and straight but allows the sloped exterior 104 to direct the pressure on the main body 102, as described above. In addition, the sloped exterior 104 does not need to be above ground level as it isn't needed for soil pressure or soil water drainage.
The I-beam 106 is placed along the right and left sides of the main body 102. I.e., the flanges are along the exterior and the interior surfaces of the main body 102 and in a slot along the sloped exterior 104. The main body 102 is in contact with the interior of the flanges and the web of the I-beam 106 (with the adjacent main body 102 in the interior of the opposite flange and web of the I-beam 106). Thus, the width of the web of I-beam 106 (the distance between the flanges) is equal to the size of the width of the main body 102. A portion of the sloped exterior 104 is on the exterior of the flange of the I-beam 106 (the side not in contact with the web).
One of skill in the art will appreciate that if the flanges of the I-beam 106 or the L-metal 108 are within a grove between the main body 102 and the sloped exterior 104 then the fasteners 110 can't be placed. However, the sloped exterior 104 can be glued or attached to the main body 102 after the fasteners 110 are placed without any loss of benefit. So, the groove between the main body 102 and the sloped exterior 104 is created after the fasteners are inserted into the L-metal 108 and the I-beam 106.
Although this seems to be a somewhat arbitrary distinction, in practice the footing 202 and the foundation are distinct structures that are produced independent of one another so the difference during construction is clear. In a smaller building requiring a shallow foundation (i.e., not a deeper foundation such as pilings) such as a residence, the footing 202 consists of strips or pads of concrete (or other materials) which extend below the frost line and transfer the weight from walls and columns to the soil or bedrock whereas the foundation is the basement, crawl space or ground floor walls (depending on the depth on the footing 202). So, for example, when a house is built with concrete footing 202 and concrete foundation, the footings are created and poured, and then the concrete foundation is created on top of the footing. The two are created at different times and usually by different work crews (i.e., crews typically specialize in one or the other but not both). So, in the best-case scenario, the footing is poured and finished (day 1) and the next day (day 2—after the footing concrete has cured) the forms for the footing are removed and the forms for the foundation can be placed. Then the next day (day 3) the concrete for the foundation is poured and on day 4 the forms are removed completing the process, which means that the superstructure can be assembled on day 5. In reality, most construction supervisors don't want to schedule one step immediately after the other, as any delay can cause logistical problems.
In contrast, the steel and foam foundation 100 can be placed much sooner than a concrete foundation. The steel and foam foundation 100 can be on site and ready to place as soon as the footing 202 are placed. This means that the footing 202 is poured and finished (day 1) and the next day (day 2—after the footing 202 concrete has cured) the forms for the footing 202 are removed and the steel and foam foundation 100 can be placed. This doesn't create the same logistical problems because a specialized crew is not needed to place the steel and foam foundation 100 and because the placing of the steel and foam foundation 100 can be placed simultaneously with or prior to the removal of the forms for the footing 202 if desired. In addition, the superstructure can be placed with the steel and foam foundation 100 only partially complete. I.e., the superstructure can be placed on the steel and foam foundation 100 immediately after placement. Thus, the superstructure can be assembled on day 2, rather than day 5 or later.
To create the basement, the steel and foam foundation 100 can be larger than in the structure 200 of
I'm assuming there is a finish on the interior of the foundation since it's a basement, but don't have any details.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.