Stent with drug coating

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7824440
  • Patent Number
    7,824,440
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 12, 2006
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 2, 2010
    15 years ago
Abstract
Coatings for stents that include a polymer and a drug are provided. A method of forming the coatings is also provided.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention is directed to an implantable device, such as a stent, having a polymeric drug coating, and method of forming the same.


2. Description of the Background


Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a procedure for treating heart disease. A catheter assembly having a balloon portion is introduced percutaneously into the cardiovascular system of a patient via the brachial or femoral artery. The catheter assembly is advanced through the coronary vasculature until the balloon portion is positioned across the occlusive lesion. Once in position across the lesion, the balloon is inflated to a predetermined size to remodel the vessel wall. The balloon is then deflated to a smaller profile to allow the catheter to be withdrawn from the patient's vasculature.


A problem associated with the above procedure includes formation of intimal flaps or torn arterial linings, which can collapse and occlude the conduit after the balloon is deflated. Vasospasms and recoil of the vessel wall also threaten vessel closure. Moreover, thrombosis and restenosis of the artery may develop over several months after the procedure, which may necessitate another angioplasty procedure or a surgical by-pass operation. To reduce the partial or total occlusion of the artery by the collapse of arterial lining and to reduce the chance of the development of thrombosis and restenosis, an expandable, intraluminal prosthesis, also known as a stent, is implanted in the lumen to maintain the vascular patency.


Stents act as scaffoldings, functioning to physically hold open and, if desired, to expand the wall of the passageway. Typically, stents are capable of being compressed so that they can be inserted through small lumens via catheters and then expanded to a larger diameter once they are at the desired location. Mechanical intervention via stents has reduced the rate of restenosis as compared to balloon angioplasty. Yet, restenosis is still a significant clinical problem with rates ranging from 20-40%. When restenosis does occur in the stented segment, its treatment can be challenging, as clinical options are more limited as compared to lesions that were treated solely with a balloon.


Stents are used not only for mechanical intervention but also as vehicles for providing biological therapy. Biological therapy can be achieved by medicating the stents. Medicated stents provide for the local administration of a drug at the diseased site. In order to provide an efficacious concentration to the treated site, systemic administration of such medication often produces adverse or even toxic side effects for the patient. Local delivery is a preferred method of treatment in that smaller total levels of medication are administered in comparison to systemic dosages, but are concentrated at a specific site. Local delivery thus produces fewer side effects and achieves more favorable results.


One proposed method of medicating stents involves the use of a polymeric carrier coated onto the surface of the stent. A composition including a solvent, a polymer dissolved in the solvent, and a drug dispersed in the blend is applied to the stent by immersing the stent in the composition or by spraying the composition onto the stent. The solvent is allowed to evaporate, leaving on the stent surfaces a coating of the polymer and the drug impregnated in the polymer.


A potential shortcoming of conventional medicated stents is that there can be an unequal release of the drug to different areas of the treatment site. For instance, in conventional stents, the concentration of the drug on the stent is essentially constant along the length of the stent. In such drug delivery stents, after the stent is implanted in the biological lumen and the drug is released from the polymeric matrix, the concentration of the drug that is applied to the tissues along the length of the stent will not be constant along the length of the stent. In particular, the drug concentration in the blood stream is higher in the distal region of the biological lumen than the proximal region.


Referring to FIG. 1, a stent 10 with a polymeric drug coating is implanted into a biological lumen 12, which has a proximal region 14 and a distal region 16. The blood in biological lumen 12 flows from proximal region 14 to distal region 16 as the drug is released from the polymeric coating. If the quantity and release rate of the drug are constant over the length of stent 10, when stent 10 is first implanted into biological lumen 12, the drug concentration in the blood will be constant along the length of stent 10 as graphically illustrated in FIG. 2A. As shown in FIG. 2B, however, over time more drug is released into the blood stream and the drug concentration in the blood in distal region 16 becomes significantly higher as compared to the drug concentration in proximal region 14. As a result, depending on the biological needs of the tissue in the respective regions, the tissue in distal region 16 can receive too much drug whereas the tissue in proximal region 14 may not receive enough drug.


Another example of a related shortcoming of conventional medicated stents is that there can be an unequal release of the drug to the tissues adjacent to the points of contact between the stent and the tissues. Referring to FIG. 1, stent 10 can have a tubular body of structural members including struts 18 and connecting elements 20 that form a network structure. Struts 18 are radially expandable and interconnected by connecting elements 20 that are disposed between adjacent struts 18. Both struts 18 and connecting elements 20 have an outer (or lumen contacting) surface and an inner surface.


In conventional stents, the concentration of drugs on the stent is essentially constant along the length of struts 18 and connecting elements 20, including any curved or bent segments. Referring to FIG. 3, when stent 10 is inserted into a biological lumen, stent 10 forms multiple contact points 30 with the tissue as shown with lines A-A and B-B. As the drug in the polymer is released from multiple contact points 30 to the tissue, delivery zones 32 are formed. If the quantity of the drug is the same along lines A-A and B-B, then some of delivery zones 32, for example delivery zone 32A, overlap. As a result, the tissue area adjacent to the overlapping delivery zones receives a greater quantity of drug than other tissue areas. Therefore, some tissue adjacent to contact points 30 may receive too much drug.


Accordingly, what is needed is a coating for a stent that addresses the aforementioned drawbacks.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a stent is disclosed including a body having a first end and a second end and carrying a coating containing a drug. The concentration of the drug in the coating increases along the length of the body of the stent from the first end to the second end.


In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a stent is disclosed including a body with a first end and a second end and carrying a coating containing a drug. The release rate of the drug from the coating increases along the length of the body from the first end to the second end.


In a further aspect, a stent is disclosed that includes a body having a coating carrying a drug, where the concentration of the drug in the coating increases along at least a circumference of the body of the stent.


In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, a strut for a radially expandable stent is disclosed having generally linear segments interrupted by a curved or bent segment. The strut also has a coating containing a drug disposed on the strut, where the concentration of the drug in the coating is greater in at least a portion of the curved or bent segment as compared to the linear segments.


In another aspect, a method of coating a stent is disclosed, the stent having a first end and a second end. The method includes applying a composition including a drug and a polymer to the stent, where the amount of drug applied to the stent gradually increases along the length of the stent from the first end to the second end.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a side view of a conventional stent inserted into a biological lumen;



FIGS. 2A and 2B are graphs of drug concentrations in blood along the length of the stent illustrated in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of a portion of the stent illustrated in FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a side view of one embodiment of a stent of the present invention inserted into a biological lumen;



FIG. 5 is a graph of the drug concentration in a stent coating along the length of the stent in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIGS. 6A and 6B are graphs of drug concentrations in blood along the length of the stent illustrated in FIG. 4;



FIG. 7 is a cross-section along line 7-7 in FIG. 4; and



FIGS. 8 and 9 are enlarged views of a portion of the stent illustrated in FIG. 4 in accordance with embodiments of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Variable Drug Concentration or Release Rate Along the Length of the Stent

The present invention is directed to a stent with a polymeric drug coating having a variable drug concentration or release rate along the length of the stent. Referring to FIG. 4, for example, a stent 40 coated with a polymeric drug coating can have a first segment 42, a second segment 44 and a third segment 46 along the length of stent 40, disposed between a first end 48 and a second end 50. In an embodiment of the present invention, the drug concentration in the coating gradually or incrementally increases along the length of stent 40 from first end 48 to second end 50. FIG. 5, for example, graphically illustrates a drug concentration in a coating that gradually increases along the length of a stent from the distal end of stent 40 to the proximal end of stent 40. The increase of the drug concentration can also be graphically illustrated to be linear or stepwise/incremental. In another embodiment of the present invention, the release rate of the drug from the coating gradually or incrementally increases along the length of stent 40 from first end 48 to second end 50.


By varying the drug concentration in the polymeric coating, or the release rate of the drug from the polymeric coating, the present invention advantageously provides a coating that provides uniform drug delivery to the target site along the length of stent 40. The distribution of the drug in the blood stream along the length of the stented portion of the biological lumen depends on the Peclet number which is defined as






Pe
=

VL
D






where V is the velocity of the blood stream, L is the length of the stented portion of the lumen, and D is the diffusivity of the drug in the blood stream. In essence, the Peclet number is the ratio of the convection to diffusion. As can be understood by the above equation, if the velocity of the blood stream is relatively high in comparison to the diffusivity, then much of the drug released from the stent will be carried away by the blood flow from the treatment area adjacent to the stent. However, in a typical blood vessel, the Peclet number is relatively low and diffusion dominated. As a result, the drug released from the stent will remain present in the blood stream at the local treatment site and will be available for absorption by the arterial wall. This is especially advantageous for portions of the arterial walls that are not being contacted by the stent but are being contacted by the blood. However, the relatively low Peclet number in a typical blood vessel results in a higher concentration of the drug in the blood stream in the distal region of the biological lumen as compared to the proximal region if the drug concentration is uniform along the length of the stent.


A stent coated in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention can provide a drug concentration in the blood that is initially high in the proximal region of lumen 12, as graphically illustrated in FIG. 6A. However, as shown in FIG. 6B, over time more drug is released into the blood stream and the drug concentration in the blood becomes uniformly distributed along the length of stent 40, providing for a beneficial long-term treatment regime.


Variable Drug Concentration or Release Rate Along the Circumference of the Stent

The present invention is also directed to a stent with a polymeric drug coating having a variable drug concentration or release rate along the circumference of the stent. A stent with such a coating can be particularly suitable to use when it is known that one side of a lumen is in greater need of a drug than the other side. The coating can be customized so that a targeted dose of the drug or a particular drug is delivered to one side of the lumen.


The stent of the present invention, for instance, can have any suitable number of coating segments along the radial perimeter of the stent, where the concentration of the drug in the coating is higher along selected segments as compared to other segments. FIG. 7 illustrates the radial perimeter of a stent with two coating segments. A first coating segment 60 extends from point E to point F, and a second coating segment 62 extends from point G to point H. In an embodiment, the drug concentration of the coating along first segment 60 can be greater than the drug concentration of the coating along second segment 62. In another embodiment, the release rate of the drug from the coating is greater in first segment 60 as compared to second segment 62.


In another embodiment, the concentration of the drug in the coating gradually increases along at least a portion of the radial perimeter of the stent. For example, referring to FIG. 7, the concentration of the drug can gradually increase from point E to point G and from point F to point. H. Also, in an embodiment, the release rate of the drug from the coating can gradually increase along at least a portion of the radial perimeter of the stent.


Variable Drug Concentration or Release Rate Along Struts of the Stent

The present invention is further directed to a stent with a polymeric drug coating having a variable drug concentration or release rate along the length of individual structural members of stent 40 such as struts 52 and connecting members 54. In this way, the drug concentration or release rate on the individual structural members can be tailored to match the geometrical configuration of the stent structure. In other words, the coating can have a variable drug concentration or release rate along the length of individual structural members to account for how the structural members are positioned relative to one another in the stent structure, e.g., as deployed in the expanded state. Referring to FIG. 8, for instance, individual strut 52 or connecting member 54 can have generally linear segments 70 that are interrupted by a curved or bent segment 72. In an embodiment, the concentration of the drug is greater in at least a portion of curved segment 72 as compared to linear segments 70. In another embodiment, the concentration of the drug is greatest at the vertex of curved segment 72 of strut 52.


By coating a stent with a variable drug concentration or release rate along the length of individual struts or connecting elements of the stent, a stent can carry a drug with delivery zones of different sizes for delivery of the drug to a selected portion of a biological lumen of a patient. “Delivery zones” refers to the region of the treatment site in which the drug is delivered, for example, by diffusion. After a stent coated in accordance with the present invention is inserted into a biological lumen of a patient, the delivery zones will not significantly overlap. Referring to FIG. 9, if the concentration of the drug is lower along the line C-C than D-D, as the drug in the polymer is released delivery zones 80 formed around contact points 82 do not significantly overlap. As a result, the tissue area adjacent to delivery zones 80 receive a more uniform amount of drug.


Methods of Varying Drug Concentration

The drug concentration on the stent can be varied by using different approaches. For ease of discussion, the following describes how to vary the drug concentration along the length of the stent. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that these same approaches can also be used to vary the drug concentration along the circumference of the stent or along individual structural members such as the struts.


In one embodiment, struts 52 and connecting elements 54 can have depots 56 for containing a drug. By varying the number of depots along the length of stent 40, the drug concentration can be varied along the length of stent 40. For instance, as shown in the enlarged windows of FIG. 4, struts 52 and connecting elements 54 in third segment 46 can contain the most number of depots 56, whereas struts 52 and connecting elements 54 located in first segment 42 contain the least. Alternatively, depots 56 of third segment 46 can be formed to contain the largest volume of the drug and depots 56 of first segment 42 can be formed to contain the smallest volume of drug. The volume of depot 56 can be increased by increasing the depth and/or diameter of depot 56.


Depots 56 may have a depth of about one half of the thickness of struts 52 or connecting elements 54 at the location of depots 56. For example, depots 56 can have a depth of about 60-80 microns. Depots can take various shapes, with representative shapes including a truncated cone shape or a dimple shape.


Depots can be formed using any suitable etching technique known to one having ordinary skill in the art such as chemical etching. Chemical etching is a manufacturing technique whereby selected portions of a metal surface are blanked or dissolved away using a chemical etchant or an acid. The desired placement of depots 56 can be performed by physically protecting portions of the stent material. Another representative example of a method of forming depots 56 includes using lasers, such as excimer lasers and Nd:YAG (neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet) lasers.


In another embodiment, the drug concentration on the stents can be varied by modifying the surface of the stents in order to increase the surface area of the stents. In other words, the surface area of the stents can be roughened to provide an irregular surface area and when the polymeric drug coating is applied, the drug concentration varies along the length of the stent because more coating can be applied to the portions of the stent which have a greater surface area than the other portions of the stent. In one embodiment, the roughness factor (hr) gradually or incrementally changes along the entire length of stent 40.


For instance, for a length of strut 52 or connecting element 54, a surface area (γ) is provided which is given by the equation: γ=2πrlhr, where r is a radius (r) of strut 52 or connecting element 54, l is a length (l) of the segment of strut 52 or connecting element 54, and hr is the roughness factor (hr) (i.e., degree of roughness) of the segment. If the surface is entirely smooth, the roughness factor (hr) is 1.0. However, if the surface area is roughened, then the roughness factor (hr) is greater than 1.0. If surface area (γ) varies throughout a given length (l) then the drug concentration will vary throughout that same length (l). Given the equation γ=2πrlhr, it can be seen that if the variable hr of the equation fluctuates in value for the same given length (l), then so too will the surface area (γ) of strut 52 or connecting element 54 within the given length (l). A change in the surface area along a given length (l) is given by the equation: γ=2πrlΔhr. The drug concentration deliverable to biological vessel 12 is increased in corresponding portions of strut 52 or connecting element 54 where (hr) is greater than 1.0.


Various methods can be used to increase the roughness factor (hr). Representative examples include chemical, plasma, laser, mechanical or other methods of etching. For example, stent 40 can be dry etched by sand blasting or plasma etched with argon in order to increase roughness. The roughness factor (hr) on struts or connecting elements can also be increased by a lithography technique. For example, a composition including a polymer (e.g., ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer) dissolved in a solvent can be applied to a stent. The solvent can then be essentially removed to form a polymeric coating. The stent can then be selectively treated with a solvent, such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dimethyl formamide (DMF), or dimethyl acetamide (DMAc) to remove portions of the polymer coating.


In another embodiment, the drug concentration can be varied by providing a stent with variable structural dimensions so that the surface area of the struts and connecting elements is variable. For example, the radius or thickness of struts 52 and connecting elements 54 can be varied along the length of stent 40 to provide a variable surface area. In one embodiment, a surface area (γ) gradually or incrementally increases along the entire length of stent 40. The drug concentration, therefore, can gradually or incrementally increase along the entire length of stent 40. Given the equation γ=2πrlhr, it can be seen that if the variable r of the equation fluctuates in value for the same given length (l), then so too will the surface area (γ) of strut 52 or connecting element 54 within the given length (l). A change in the surface area along a given length (l) is given by the equation: γ=2πΔrlhr.


Stent 40 can be manufactured by using a laser to cut from, for example, a stainless steel tube. The laser cutting process can be run according to an automated process to form a particular stent configuration. For example, in order to increase radius (r) in particular struts 52 and connecting elements 54, the automated process is programmed to cut with an increasing radius (r) along the length of stent 40 so that the surface area (γ) ultimately changes gradually or incrementally from one end of stent 40 to the other.


In another embodiment of the present invention, the drug concentration on the stents can be varied by selective application of the polymeric drug coating composition. For example, stent 40 can be selectively dipped in multiple repetitions so that the coating is less thick or absent from particular segments of stent 40. By using a selective dipping process, the thickness of the coating can gradually or incrementally increase from first end 48 to second end 50. Additionally, for example, a spray coater can be used to selectively apply the polymeric drug coating to stent 40 so that the thickness of the coating varies along the length of the stent. Masks, for example, can be placed along certain segments of the stent during a portion of the coating process, thereby blocking the composition ejected from the spray coater along these segments. By gradually moving the mask along the length of the stent during the spray application, the coating thickness can be gradually increased from first end 48 to second end 50.


In another embodiment, the drug concentration on the stents can be varied by changing the drug concentration in the composition during the coating process. For example, during a spraying process, the amount of a drug can be gradually increased in the composition while the composition is being sprayed onto the stent from one end of the stent to the other.


Methods of Varying the Release Rate

The release rate of the drug from the polymeric coating on the stent can be varied by using different approaches. As with the previous section, for ease of discussion, the following describes how to vary the release rate along the length of the stent. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that these same approaches can also be used to vary the release rate along the circumference of the stent or along individual structural members such as struts.


The release rate of the drug from the polymeric coating can be varied along the length of the stent by varying the thickness of the coating. For example, if the thickness of the polymeric coating is gradually or incrementally decreased along the length of the stent while maintaining a constant drug concentration along the same length of stent, the release rate of the drug will gradually or incrementally increase over this length. For example, a stent coating could have a profile as described in Table I.












TABLE I






Coating
Drug
Drug Release



Thickness
Concentration
Rate


Stent Segment
(μm)
(μg)
(μg/hour)


















I
20
100
1


(distal segment)


II
15
100
1.5


(middle segment)


III
10
100
2


(proximal segment)










The drug release rate from the distal segment would be less than the release rate from the middle and proximal segments because the drug would have to diffuse through more polymer. The thickness of the coating can be varied while maintaining a constant drug concentration by varying the drug concentration during multiple spray applications in combination with a masking technique. For example, for the application of the coating of Table I, the following application process could be applied:












TABLE II







Coating
Drug



Segment
Applied to
Concentration in


Spray Application
Masked
Stent (μm)
the Composition







First
II and III
20
n


Second
I and III
15
1.5n


Third
I and II
10
2n









The release rate of the drug from the polymeric coating can also be varied along the length of the stent by varying the thickness of particular regions of the coating. For example, the polymeric coating could have a reservoir region that contains the drug, and a diffusion barrier layer that is substantially free from drug and reduces the release rate of the drug from the coating. The release rate can be varied along the length of the stent by varying the thickness of the barrier layer along the length of the stent, for example, by masking portions of the stent during spray application.


The release rate can also be varied by using different polymers that have different drug permeabilities along the length of the stent. For example, if the reservoir layer is constructed of a polymer A (e.g., ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer) that produces a higher release rate than a reservoir layer constructed of polymer B (with the same thickness) (e.g., polybutylmethacrylate), then the release rate can be varied by using pure polymer A at particular segments of stent 40 and pure polymer B at other segments. The release rate can be varied along the length of stent 40 by mixing varying amounts of polymer A and B along the length. One skilled in the art will understand that the release rate will be determined in part by the diffusion rate of the drug in the particular polymer or polymers used in the coating.


Embodiments of the Composition

The composition for the coating can include a solvent, a polymer dissolved in the solvent and a drug. The composition can be applied to the surface of the stent by any conventional means, and a final heat treatment can be conducted to remove essentially all of the solvent from the composition to form the coating.


Representative examples of polymers that can be used to coat a stent in accordance with the present invention include ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (commonly known by the generic name EVOH or by the trade name EVAL), poly(hydroxyvalerate); poly(L-lactic acid); polycaprolactone; poly(lactide-co-glycolide); poly(hydroxybutyrate); poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate); polydioxanone; polyorthoester; polyanhydride; poly(glycolic acid); poly(D,L-lactic acid); poly(glycolic acid-co-tri methylene carbonate); polyphosphloester; polyphosphoester urethane; poly(amino acids); cyanoacrylates; poly(tri miethylene carbonate); poly(iminocarbonate); copoly(ether-esters) (e.g. PEO/PLA); polyalkylene oxalates; polyphosphazenes; bioniolecules, such as fibrin, fibrinogen, cellulose, starch, collagen and hyaluronic acid; polyurethanes; silicones; polyesters; polyolefins; polyisobutylene and ethylene-alphaolefin copolymers; acrylic polymers and copolymers; vinyl halide polymers and copolymers, such as polyvinyl chloride; polyvinyl ethers, such as polyvinyl methyl ether; polyvinylidene halides, such as polyvinylidene fluoride and polyvinylidene chloride; polyacrylonitrile; polyvinyl ketones; polyvinyl aromatics, such as polystyrene; polyvinyl esters, such as polyvinyl acetate; copolymers of vinyl monomers with each other and olefins, such as ethylene-methyl methacrylate copolymers, acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers, ABS resins, and ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers; polyamides, such as Nylon 66 and polycaprolactam; alkyd resins; polycarbonates; polyoxymethylenes; polyimides; polyethers; epoxy resins; polyurethanes; polybutylmethacrylate; rayon; rayon-triacetate; cellulose acetate; cellulose butyrate; cellulose acetate butyrate; cellophane; cellulose nitrate; cellulose propionate; cellulose ethers; and carboxymethyl cellulose.


“Solvent” is defined as a liquid substance or composition that is compatible with the polymer and is capable of dissolving the polymer at the concentration desired in the composition. Representative examples of solvents include chloroform, acetone, water (buffered saline), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), propylene glycol methyl ether (PM,) isopropylalcohol (IPA), n-propylalcohol, methanol, ethanol, tetrahydrofuran (THF), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl acetamide (DMAC), benzene, toluene, xylene, hiexane, cyclohexane, heptane, octane, nonanie, decane, decalin, ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, butanol, diacetone alcohol, benzyl alcohol, 2-butanone, cyclohexanone, dioxane, methylene chloride, carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, tetrachloro ethane, chlorobenzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, formamide, hexafluoroisopropanol, 1,1,1-trifluoroethanol, and hexamethyl phosphoramide and a combination thereof.


The drug contained in the coating can be for inhibiting the activity of vascular smooth muscle cells. More specifically, the drug can be aimed at inhibiting abnormal or inappropriate migration and/or proliferation of smooth muscle cells for the inhibition of restenosis. The drug can also include any substance capable of exerting a therapeutic or prophylactic effect in the practice of the present invention. For example, the drug can be for enhancing wound healing in a vascular site or improving the structural and elastic properties of the vascular site. Examples of drugs include antiproliferative substances such as actinomycin D, or derivatives and analogs thereof (manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich 1001 West Saint Paul Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis. 53233; or COSMEGEN available from Merck). Synonyms of actinomycin D include dactinomycin, actinomycin IV, actinomycin I1, actinomycin X1, and actinomycin C1. The drug can also fall under the genus of antineoplastic, antiinflammatory, antiplatelet, anticoagulant, antifibrin, antithrombin, antimitotic, antibiotic, antiallergic and antioxidant substances. Examples of such antineoplastics and/or antimitotics include paclitaxel (e.g. TAXOL® by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.), docetaxel (e.g. Taxotere®, from Aventis S.A., Frankfurt, Germany), methotrexate, azathioprine, vincristine, vinblastine, fluorouracil, doxorubicin hydrochloride (e.g. Adriamycin® from Pharmacia & Upjohn, Peapack, N.J.), and mitomycin (e.g. Mutamycin® from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.). Examples of such antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antifibrin, and antithrombins include sodium heparin, low molecular weight heparins, heparinoids, hirudin, argatroban, forskolin, vapiprost, prostacyclin and prostacyclin analogues, dextran, D-phe-pro-arg-chloromethylketone (synthetic antithrombil), dipyridamole, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet membrane receptor antagonist antibody, recombinant hirudin, and thrombin inhibitors such as Angiomax™ (Biogen, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.). Examples of such cytostatic or antiproliferative agents include angiopeptin, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors such as captopril (e.g. Capoten® and Capozide® from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Stamford, Conn.), cilazapril or lisinopril (e.g. Prinivil® and Prinzide® from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J.), calcium channel blockers (such as nifedipine), colchicine, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) antagonists, fish oil (omega 3-fatty acid), histamine antagonists, lovastatin (an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, a cholesterol lowering drug, brand name Mevacor® from Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J.), monoclonal antibodies (such as those specific for Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) receptors), nitroprusside, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, prostaglandin inhibitors, suramin, serotonin blockers, steroids, thioprotease inhibitors, triazolopyrimidine (a PDGF antagonist), and nitric oxide. An example of an antiallergic agent is permirolast potassium. Other therapeutic substances or agents which may be appropriate include alpha-interferon, genetically engineered epithelial cells, tacrolimus, dexamethasone, and rapamycin and structural derivatives or functional analogs thereof, such as 40-O-(2-hydroxy)ethyl-rapanlycin (known by the trade name of EVEROLIMUS available from Novartis), 40-O-(3-hydroxy)propyl-rapamycin, 40-O-[2-(2-hydroxy)ethoxy] ethyl-rapamycin, and 40-O-tetrazole-rapamycin.


The dosage or concentration of the drug required to produce a favorable therapeutic effect should be less than the level at which the drug produces toxic effects and greater than the level at which non-therapeutic results are obtained. The dosage or concentration of the drug required to inhibit the desired cellular activity of the vascular region can depend upon factors such as the particular circumstances of the patient; the nature of the trauma; the nature of the therapy desired; the time over which the ingredient administered resides at the vascular site; and if other drugs are employed, the nature and type of the substance or combination of substances. Therapeutic effective dosages can be determined empirically, for example by infusing vessels from suitable animal model systems and using immunohistochemical, fluorescent or electron microscopy methods to detect the agent and its effects, or by conducting suitable in vitro studies. Standard pharmacological test procedures to determine dosages are understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.


Optional Coating Layers

An optional primer layer can be formed prior to the reservoir coating (i.e., the coating containing the drug) to increase the retention of the reservoir coating on the surface of the stent, particularly metallic surfaces such as stainless steel. The primer layer can act as an intermediary adhesive tie layer between the surface of the device and the reservoir coating, allowing for the quantity of the drug to be increased in the reservoir coating. In addition, an optional diffusion barrier can be formed over the reservoir coating to reduce the rate at which the drug is released from the coated stent.


While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications can be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspects. Therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.

Claims
  • 1. A stent comprising: a tubular body including a plurality of structural elements, sections of the structural elements lie on an imaginary cut plane perpendicular to a central axis of the tubular body, the sections together forming a perimeter; anda coating on the body, the coating including a drug, the amount of the drug on the body varying along the perimeter.
  • 2. The stent of claim 1, wherein the surface area of the structural elements varies along the perimeter, and the amount of the drug on the body varies with the surface area of the structural elements.
  • 3. The stent of claim 1, wherein the structural elements forming the perimeter have a surface roughness factor that varies along the perimeter, and the amount of the drug on the body varies with the surface roughness factor.
  • 4. The stent of claim 1, wherein the surface area of the body varies along the perimeter, and the amount of the drug on the body varies with the surface area of the body.
  • 5. The stent of claim 1, wherein the surface of the body has a roughness factor that varies along the perimeter, and the amount of the drug on the body varies with the roughness factor.
  • 6. The stent of claim 1, wherein the amount of the drug on the body varies continuously over a segment of the perimeter.
  • 7. The stent of claim 1, wherein the amount of the drug on the body varies in a step-wise manner along the perimeter.
  • 8. The stent of claim 1, wherein the structural elements in a first segment of the perimeter carry more of the drug than the structural elements in a second segment of the perimeter.
  • 9. The stent of claim 1, wherein amounts of the drug carried by the structural elements forming the perimeter vary among the structural elements.
  • 10. The stent of claim 1, wherein the amount of drug on the body varies as a function of angular position on the perimeter, and the angular position is an angle between two radial lines passing through a point in an area bounded by the circumference.
  • 11. The stent of claim 1, wherein a first section, from among the sections of the structural elements, on the imaginary cut plane has a substantially greater amount of the drug than a second section, from among the sections of the structural elements, on the imaginary cut plane.
  • 12. A stent comprising: a network of structural elements forming a tube having sections on an imaginary cut plane perpendicular to a central axis of the tube, the sections together forming a circumference; anda drug carried on the structural elements, the amount of drug on a first half of the circumference being greater than the amount of the drug on a second half of the circumference due to a difference in surface area or surface roughness between the first half of the circumference and the second half of the circumference.
  • 13. The stent of claim 12, wherein the first half of the circumference has a greater surface area than the second half of the circumference.
  • 14. The stent of claim 12, wherein the first half of the circumference has a greater surface roughness than the second half of the circumference.
  • 15. The stent of claim 12, wherein: the first half of the circumference includes a first series of sections, from among the sections of the tube, on the imaginary cut plane; andthe second half of the circumference includes a second series of sections, from among the sections of the tube, on the imaginary cut plane.
  • 16. A stent comprising: a tubular body having sections on an imaginary cut plane perpendicular to a central axis of the tubular body, the sections together forming a perimeter; anda coating carried by the tubular body, the coating including a drug at an amount that is greater on a first side of the perimeter than on a second side of the perimeter located opposite the first side.
  • 17. The stent of claim 16, wherein the first side and the second side include struts, and each of the struts of the first side has a greater surface area than that of each of the struts on the second side.
  • 18. The stent of claim 16, wherein the first side and the second side include struts, and each of the struts of the first side has a roughness factor that is greater than that of each of the struts on the second side.
  • 19. The stent of claim 16, wherein: the first side of the perimeter includes a first series of sections, from among the sections of the tubular body, on the imaginary cut plane; andthe second side of the perimeter includes a second series of sections, from among the sections of the tubular body, on the imaginary cut plane.
  • 20. A stent comprising: a network of struts forming a tubular body, the struts intersecting an imaginary cut plane perpendicular to a central axis of the tubular body, the strut together forming a circumference; anda drug carried by the struts, the amount of the drug carried by each strut in a first segment of the circumference being greater than the amount of the drug carried by each strut in a second segment of the circumference.
  • 21. The stent of claim 20, wherein the surface area of each strut in the first segment is greater than that of each strut in the second segment.
  • 22. The stent of claim 20, wherein the each strut in the first segment has a roughness factor that is greater than that of each strut in the second segment.
  • 23. The stent of claim 20, wherein: the first segment of the circumference includes a first series of struts, from among the struts of the network, intersecting the imaginary cut plane; andthe second segment of the circumference includes a second series of struts, from among the struts of the network, intersecting the imaginary cut plane.
  • 24. A stent comprising: a tubular body having sections on an imaginary cut plane perpendicular to a central axis of the tubular body, the sections together forming a circumference; anda drug carried by the body, the drug having a drug concentration that varies along the circumference due to a difference in surface area or surface roughness between a first portion of the body and a second portion of the body.
  • 25. The stent of claim 24, wherein the first and second portions include structural elements, each of the structural elements have a surface area, and the drug concentration varies with variations in the surface areas of the structural elements.
  • 26. The stent of claim 24, wherein the first and second portions include structural elements, each of the structural elements have a surface roughness factor, and the drug concentration varies with variations in the roughness factors of the structural elements.
  • 27. The stent of claim 24, wherein the drug concentration varies with angular position on the circumference and the angular position is an angle between two radial lines passing through a point in an area bounded by the circumference.
  • 28. The stent of claim 24, wherein a first section, from among the sections of the tubular body, on the imaginary cut plane has a substantially greater concentration of the drug than a second section, from among the sections of the tubular body, on the imaginary cut plane.
CROSS REFERENCE

This is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 10/293,658, which was filed on Nov. 12, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,169,178.

US Referenced Citations (214)
Number Name Date Kind
2072303 Herrmann et al. Mar 1937 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4800882 Gianturco Jan 1989 A
4886062 Wiktor Dec 1989 A
4931287 Bae et al. Jun 1990 A
4977901 Ofstead Dec 1990 A
4994560 Kruper, Jr. et al. Feb 1991 A
5040548 Yock Aug 1991 A
5051978 Mayer et al. Sep 1991 A
5059166 Fischell et al. Oct 1991 A
5064435 Porter Nov 1991 A
5087244 Wolinsky et al. Feb 1992 A
5100429 Sinofsky et al. Mar 1992 A
5213561 Weinstein et al. May 1993 A
5229172 Cahalan et al. Jul 1993 A
5232444 Just et al. Aug 1993 A
5258419 Rolando et al. Nov 1993 A
5278200 Coury et al. Jan 1994 A
5308641 Cahalan et al. May 1994 A
5328471 Slepian Jul 1994 A
5336518 Narayanan et al. Aug 1994 A
5342283 Good Aug 1994 A
5342621 Eury Aug 1994 A
5344425 Sawyer Sep 1994 A
5344455 Keogh et al. Sep 1994 A
5350800 Verhoeven et al. Sep 1994 A
5366504 Andersen et al. Nov 1994 A
5411466 Hess May 1995 A
5415938 Cahalan et al. May 1995 A
5429618 Keogh Jul 1995 A
5441515 Khosravi et al. Aug 1995 A
5443496 Schwartz et al. Aug 1995 A
5464450 Buscemi et al. Nov 1995 A
5464650 Berg et al. Nov 1995 A
5470313 Crocker et al. Nov 1995 A
5476509 Keogh et al. Dec 1995 A
5500013 Buscemi et al. Mar 1996 A
5551954 Buscemi et al. Sep 1996 A
5554182 Dinh et al. Sep 1996 A
5571166 Dinh et al. Nov 1996 A
5578073 Haimovich et al. Nov 1996 A
5591224 Schwartz et al. Jan 1997 A
5591227 Dinh et al. Jan 1997 A
5593434 Williams Jan 1997 A
5599352 Dinh et al. Feb 1997 A
5605696 Eury et al. Feb 1997 A
5624411 Tuch Apr 1997 A
5628730 Shapland et al. May 1997 A
5628785 Schwartz et al. May 1997 A
5637113 Tartaglia et al. Jun 1997 A
5649977 Campbell Jul 1997 A
5667767 Greff et al. Sep 1997 A
5670558 Onishi et al. Sep 1997 A
5674242 Phan et al. Oct 1997 A
5693085 Buirge et al. Dec 1997 A
5693376 Fetherston et al. Dec 1997 A
5697967 Dinh et al. Dec 1997 A
5700286 Tartaglia et al. Dec 1997 A
5702818 Cahalan et al. Dec 1997 A
5707385 Williams Jan 1998 A
5711812 Chapek et al. Jan 1998 A
5713949 Jayaraman Feb 1998 A
5716981 Hunter et al. Feb 1998 A
5722984 Fischell et al. Mar 1998 A
5730698 Fischell et al. Mar 1998 A
5766710 Turnlund et al. Jun 1998 A
5769883 Buscemi et al. Jun 1998 A
5769884 Solovay Jun 1998 A
5782742 Crocker et al. Jul 1998 A
5800392 Racchini Sep 1998 A
5811151 Hendriks et al. Sep 1998 A
5824048 Tuch Oct 1998 A
5824049 Ragheb et al. Oct 1998 A
5826586 Mishra et al. Oct 1998 A
5830178 Jones et al. Nov 1998 A
5837313 Ding et al. Nov 1998 A
5840009 Fischell et al. Nov 1998 A
5843172 Yan Dec 1998 A
5851231 Wolff et al. Dec 1998 A
5851508 Greff et al. Dec 1998 A
5857998 Barry Jan 1999 A
5858556 Eckart et al. Jan 1999 A
5858990 Walsh Jan 1999 A
5865814 Tuch Feb 1999 A
5866113 Hendriks et al. Feb 1999 A
5871437 Alt Feb 1999 A
5873904 Ragheb et al. Feb 1999 A
5893840 Hull et al. Apr 1999 A
5897911 Loeffler Apr 1999 A
5902631 Wang et al. May 1999 A
5916234 Lam Jun 1999 A
5925552 Keogh et al. Jul 1999 A
5928916 Keogh Jul 1999 A
5968091 Pinchuk et al. Oct 1999 A
5968092 Buscemi et al. Oct 1999 A
5971954 Conway et al. Oct 1999 A
5972027 Johnson Oct 1999 A
5972029 Fuisz Oct 1999 A
5980564 Stinson Nov 1999 A
5980928 Terry Nov 1999 A
5980972 Ding Nov 1999 A
5997517 Whitbourne Dec 1999 A
6010530 Goicoechea Jan 2000 A
6013099 Dinh et al. Jan 2000 A
6015541 Greff et al. Jan 2000 A
6019789 Dinh et al. Feb 2000 A
6024918 Hendriks et al. Feb 2000 A
6027526 Limon et al. Feb 2000 A
6033719 Keogh Mar 2000 A
6042606 Frantzen Mar 2000 A
6042875 Ding et al. Mar 2000 A
6071305 Brown et al. Jun 2000 A
6080190 Schwartz Jun 2000 A
6093199 Brown et al. Jul 2000 A
6096070 Ragheb et al. Aug 2000 A
6099455 Columbo et al. Aug 2000 A
6099559 Nolting Aug 2000 A
6099561 Alt Aug 2000 A
6106454 Berg et al. Aug 2000 A
6110483 Whitbourne et al. Aug 2000 A
6140127 Sprague Oct 2000 A
6140431 Kinker et al. Oct 2000 A
6153252 Hossainy et al. Nov 2000 A
6165212 Dereume et al. Dec 2000 A
6168619 Dinh et al. Jan 2001 B1
6203551 Wu Mar 2001 B1
6214901 Chudzik et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224894 Jamiolkowski et al. May 2001 B1
6231590 Slaikeu et al. May 2001 B1
6242041 Katoot et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253443 Johnson Jul 2001 B1
6254632 Wu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258121 Yang et al. Jul 2001 B1
6262034 Mathiowitz et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273913 Wright et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287628 Hossainy et al. Sep 2001 B1
6319520 Wuthrich et al. Nov 2001 B1
4733665 Palmaz Jan 2002 C1
6344035 Chudzik et al. Feb 2002 B1
6379379 Wang Apr 2002 B1
6379381 Hossainy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6395326 Castro et al. May 2002 B1
6413272 Igaki Jul 2002 B1
6488701 Nolting et al. Dec 2002 B1
6558733 Hossainy et al. May 2003 B1
6596296 Nelson et al. Jul 2003 B1
6652575 Wang Nov 2003 B2
6663662 Pacetti et al. Dec 2003 B2
6699281 Vallana et al. Mar 2004 B2
6702849 Dutta et al. Mar 2004 B1
6712845 Hossainy Mar 2004 B2
6716444 Castro et al. Apr 2004 B1
6764505 Hossainy et al. Jul 2004 B1
6783543 Jang Aug 2004 B2
6783793 Hossainy et al. Aug 2004 B1
6790228 Hossainy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6805709 Schaldach et al. Oct 2004 B1
6805898 Wu et al. Oct 2004 B1
6849089 Stoll Feb 2005 B2
6939376 Shulze et al. Sep 2005 B2
7056338 Shanley et al. Jun 2006 B2
7077859 Sirhan et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083642 Sirhan et al. Aug 2006 B2
7135038 Limon Nov 2006 B1
7135039 De Scheerder et al. Nov 2006 B2
7169178 Santos et al. Jan 2007 B1
7208011 Shanley et al. Apr 2007 B2
7279175 Chen et al. Oct 2007 B2
7445629 Rosenthal et al. Nov 2008 B2
7585320 Hamm et al. Sep 2009 B2
7607208 Curcio et al. Oct 2009 B2
7632307 Pacetti et al. Dec 2009 B2
20010001806 Turnlund et al. May 2001 A1
20020007209 Scheerder et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020068969 Shanley et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020183581 Yoe et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030068355 Shanley et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030073961 Happ Apr 2003 A1
20030088307 Shulze et al. May 2003 A1
20030104028 Hossainy et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030105964 Brainard et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030139801 Sirhan et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030181973 Sahota Sep 2003 A1
20040086493 Hubbell et al. May 2004 A1
20040098106 Williams et al. May 2004 A1
20040106987 Palasis et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122506 Shanley et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040127976 Diaz Jul 2004 A1
20040148012 Jang Jul 2004 A9
20040162609 Hossainy et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040191404 Hossainy et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040254638 Byun et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050033412 Wu et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050107864 Hong et al. May 2005 A1
20050161859 Miller et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050211680 Li et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228482 Herzog et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060122697 Shanley et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129225 Kopia et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149365 Fifer et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060200231 O'Brien et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224234 Jayaraman Oct 2006 A1
20070123977 Cottone et al. May 2007 A1
20070173923 Savage et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070196433 Ron et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070207186 Scanlon et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080077218 McMorrow et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080140186 Grignani et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090005861 Hossainy et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030507 Klocke et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090165295 Cohen et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090208555 Kuttler et al. Aug 2009 A1
20100042205 Atanasoska et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057188 Weber Mar 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
19916086 Oct 1999 DE
0 627 226 Dec 1994 EP
0 665 023 Aug 1995 EP
0 701 803 Mar 1996 EP
0 850 604 Jul 1998 EP
0 970 711 Jan 2000 EP
0 972 498 Jan 2000 EP
0 850 651 Jun 2000 EP
1 103 234 May 2001 EP
WO 9001969 Mar 1990 WO
WO 9112846 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9745105 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9823228 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9963981 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0012147 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0064506 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0101890 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0145763 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0191918 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0247731 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02083039 Oct 2002 WO
WO04000379 Dec 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070032858 A1 Feb 2007 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10293658 Nov 2002 US
Child 11580717 US