1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to methods for manufacturing semiconductor devices having improved device performances, and, more particularly to methods for forming a relaxed SiGe film.
2. Background Description
The escalating requirements for ultra large scale integration semiconductor devices require ever increasing high performance and density of transistors. With device scaling-down reaching limits, the trend has been to seek new materials and methods that enhance device performance. One of the most direct methods to increase performance is through mobility enhancement. It has been known that stress or strain applied to semiconductor lattice structures can improve device performances. For example, an N type device formed on an biaxially strained (e.g., an expanded lattice) silicon substrate exhibits better device performances than other N type devices formed on a silicon substrate without strain (or the expanded lattice structure). Also, a P type device having longitudinal (in the direction of current flow) compressive strain exhibits better device performance than other P type devices formed on a silicon substrate without such strain. The P type device also exhibits enhanced performance with very large biaxial tensile strain.
Alternatively, it has been known that a device exhibits better performance characteristics when formed on a silicon layer (or cap) that is epitaxially grown on another epitaxially grown SiGe layer that has relaxed on top of the silicon substrate. In this system, the silicon cap experiences biaxial tensile strain. When epitaxially grown on silicon, an unrelaxed SiGe layer will have a lattice constant that conforms to that of the silicon substrate. Upon relaxation (through a high temperature process for example) the SiGe lattice constant approaches that of its intrinsic lattice constant which is larger than that of silicon. A fully relaxed SiGe layer has a lattice constant close to that of its intrinsic value. When the silicon layer is epitaxially grown thereon, the silicon layer conforms to the larger lattice constant of the relaxed SiGe layer and this applies physical biaxial stress (e.g., expansion) to the silicon layer being formed thereon. This physical stress applied to the silicon layer is beneficial to the devices (e.g., CMOS devices) formed thereon because the expanded silicon layer increases N type device performance and higher Ge concentration in the SiGe layer improves P type device performances.
Relaxation in SiGe on silicon substrates occurs through the formation of misfit dislocations. For a perfectly relaxed substrate, one can envision a grid of misfit dislocations equally spaced that relieve the stress. The misfit dislocations facilitate the lattice constant in the SiGe layer to seek its intrinsic value by providing extra half-planes of silicon in the substrate. The mismatch strain across the SiGe/silicon interface is then accommodated and the SiGe lattice constant is allowed to get larger.
However, the problem with this conventional approach is that it requires a multi-layered SiGe buffer layer that is very thick (e.g., a thickness of approximately 5000 Å to 15000 Å) to achieve misfit dislocations on its surface portion while avoiding threading dislocations between the SiGe layer and the silicon substrate layer, thereby achieving a relaxed SiGe structure on the surface of the multi-layered SiGe layer. Also, this approach significantly increases manufacturing time and costs. Further, the thick graded SiGe buffer layer cannot be easily applied to silicon-on-insulator (SOI). This is because for silicon-on-insulator the silicon thickness has to be below 1500 Å for the benefits of SOI to be valid. The SiGe buffer layer structure is too thick.
Another problem is that misfit dislocations formed between the SiGe layer and the silicon epitaxial layer are random and highly non-uniform and cannot be easily controlled due to heterogeneous nucleation that cannot be easily controlled. Also, misfit dislocation densities are significantly different from one place to another. Thus, the physical stress derived from the non-uniform misfit dislocations are apt to be also highly non-uniform in the silicon epitaxial layer, and this non-uniform stress causes non-uniform benefits for performance with larger variability. Further at those locations where misfit density are high, the defects degrade device performances through shorting device terminals and through other significant leakage mechanisms.
Therefore, there is a need for effective methodology for manufacturing a relaxed SiGe layer.
In an aspect of the invention, a method is provided for manufacturing semiconductor device. First, a compressively strained SiGe layer is formed on a silicon substrate. Atoms are ion-implanted to form uniformly distributed interstitial dislocation loops in the SiGe layer. Annealing is performed to form uniformly distributed misfit dislocations at the SiGe-silicon interface.
In another aspect of the invention, a method for forming a semiconductor substrate is provided. A SiGe layer is formed on a silicon substrate and the SiGe layer is compressively strained. Atoms are controllably ion-implanted onto the SiGe layer causing univofrmly distributed end-of-range damage therein. Annealing is performed to form interstitial dislocation loops uniformly distributed in the SiGe layer. The uniformly distributed interstitial dislocation loops nucleate uniformly distributed misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer. An expansively strained silicon layer is formed on the SiGe layer.
Yet another aspect of the invention is a semiconductor device having a silicon substrate. A relaxed SiGe layer is formed on the silicon substrate and the SiGe layer includes uniformly distributed misfit dislocations. An expansively strained silicon layer is formed on the relaxed SiGe layer.
The foregoing and other advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
The invention provides a method that provides an expansively strained silicon layer, which improves performances of the devices formed thereon. The strained silicon layer is formed by epitaxially growing silicon on a relaxed SiGe layer. The relaxed SiGe layer is formed by forming uniformly distributed misfit dislocations in an initially compressively strained SiGe layer formed on a silicon substrate. Nucleation of the misfit dislocations is heavily influenced by interstitial dislocation loops. Thus, in the invention, the interstitial dislocation loops are formed at the desired locations in the SiGe layer with desired densities, in order to control the dislocations and densities of nucleation of the misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer. Thus, the compressively strained SiGe layer is relaxed by nucleation of the misfit dislocations. Since the SiGe layer is relaxed, the silicon layer formed thereon is formed as expansively conforming to the larger lattice constant of the relaxed SiGe layer. As a result, the silicon layer is biaxially tensilely strained, and this increases performances of the devices formed thereon.
In
During the ion-implantation, the atoms collide with the lattice structure of the SiGe layer 12 and cause amorphization. In an embodiment, for the amorphization, Ge is ion-implanted at an impurity concentration of approximately 3×1014 atoms/cm2. End-of-range damage to the SiGe layer 12 is formed upon annealing of the amorphized silicon/SiGe material. The end of range damage consists of interstitial loops that coalesce from the damage during annealing. They are relatively stable and have sizes of approximately 100 Å to 500 Å, and have a relatively uniform density.
The end-of-range damage is embedded in the SiGe layer 12 from the interface between the amorphous region 14 and the SiGe layer 12 down towards the interface between the SiGe layer 12 and the silicon substrate 10. The locations of end-of-range damage can be accurately modulated by controlling the ion-implantation concentration and energy. Thus, when the atoms are ion-implanted to form the amorphous layer 14, the implantation concentration and energy are controllably selected such that the end-of-range damage is uniformly distributed in the SiGe layer 12. For example, the atoms are ion-implanted at an implantation concentration of approximately 1×1014 atoms/cm2 to 1×1016 atoms/cm2 at implantation energy of approximately 5 KeV to 100 KeV. As will be explained later, the end-of-range damage provides a basis for nucleation of misfit dislocations.
Subsequently, annealing is performed for recrystallization of the amorphous layer 14. In an embodiment, the annealing is performed at a temperature of approximately 500° C. to 1100° C. for approximately 1 second to 30 minutes. Also, the annealing can be performed via spike, rapid thermal or other annealing techniques. As shown in
While the SiGe layer 12 is annealed and the amorphous layer 14 is recrystallized, the compressive strain applied to the SiGe layer 12 is relieved and the SiGe layer 12 is relaxed, as shown by arrows “B” in
In an embodiment, a density of the misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer is approximately 1×105 #/cm2 to 1×1012 #/cm2. An example is shown in
Although it is not shown, conventional processing steps are performed to form devices on the biaxially strained silicon tensile layer 20. For example, a gate structure is formed on the silicon layer 20 with a gate oxide therebetween. Source and drain regions are formed in the expansively strained silicon layer 20 by ion-implanting impurity atoms. The tensilely strained silicon layer performs as a substrate and improves device performances.
In the embodiment described above, the atoms are ion-implanted after the SiGe layer 12 is formed on the substrate 10. However, the atoms can be ion-implanted onto the silicon substrate 10 before the SiGe layer 12 is formed. Alternatively, the ion-implantation can be performed after the silicon layer 20 is formed on the SiGe layer 12. In these cases, the degree of the silicon relaxation would still increase the silicon relaxation.
As previously explained so far, according to the invention, the silicon layer 20 is expansively strained due to the relaxation of the underlying SiGe layer 12. The relaxation is caused by forming uniformly distributed misfit dislocations in the compressively strained SiGe layer 12. Since the misfit dislocations are nucleated under the heavy influence of the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16, in the invention, the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16 are formed at the desired locations and at the desired density. The uniform distribution of the interstitial dislocation loops 16 is achieved by controllably ion-implanting atoms so as to form uniformly-distributed end-of-range damage to the SiGe layer. Also, the present invention does not require to form a thick multi-layered SiGe layer to avoid thread dislocations. Accordingly, the invention provides time and cost effective methodology for manufacturing an tensilely strained silicon layer.
While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/667,603, filed on Sep. 23, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,641 which is now incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3602841 | McGroddy | Aug 1971 | A |
4665415 | Esaki et al. | May 1987 | A |
4853076 | Tsaur et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855245 | Neppl et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4860067 | Jackson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4952524 | Lee et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958213 | Eklund et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5006913 | Sugahara et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5060030 | Hoke | Oct 1991 | A |
5081513 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5097308 | Salih | Mar 1992 | A |
5102810 | Salih | Apr 1992 | A |
5108843 | Ohtaka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5134085 | Gilgen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5310446 | Konishi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354695 | Leedy | Oct 1994 | A |
5371399 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391510 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5395770 | Miki et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5459346 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471948 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5557122 | Shrivastava et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561302 | Candelaria | Oct 1996 | A |
5565697 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571741 | Leedy | Nov 1996 | A |
5592007 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5592018 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5670798 | Schetzina | Sep 1997 | A |
5679965 | Schetzina | Oct 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5840593 | Leedy | Nov 1998 | A |
5861651 | Brasen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5880040 | Sun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888885 | Xie | Mar 1999 | A |
5940736 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946559 | Leedy | Aug 1999 | A |
5989978 | Peidous | Nov 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6025280 | Brady et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039803 | Fitzgerald et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046464 | Schetzina | Apr 2000 | A |
6066545 | Doshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090684 | Ishitsuka et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107143 | Park et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117722 | Wuu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133071 | Nagai | Oct 2000 | A |
6165383 | Chou | Dec 2000 | A |
6221735 | Manley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228694 | Doyle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246095 | Brady et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255169 | Li et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261964 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274444 | Wang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281532 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284626 | Kim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313016 | Kibbel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361885 | Chou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362082 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368931 | Kuhn et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403975 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406973 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6476462 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483171 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493497 | Ramdani et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498358 | Lach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501121 | Yu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506652 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509618 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6521964 | Jan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531369 | Ozkan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531740 | Bosco et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6583015 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6593191 | Fitzgerald | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6717216 | Doris et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734527 | Xiang | May 2004 | B1 |
6825529 | Chidambarrao et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831292 | Currie et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6974981 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977194 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7015082 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7049627 | Vineis et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20020063292 | Armstrong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020074598 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086472 | Roberds et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090791 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030032261 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040158 | Saitoh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030107032 | Yoshida | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143783 | Maa et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040031979 | Lochtefeld et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040493 | Vineis et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040150006 | Aulnette et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040238914 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262784 | Doris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050040460 | Chidambarrao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082634 | Doris et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093030 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098829 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106799 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145954 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148146 | Doris et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194699 | Belyansky et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236668 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245017 | Belyansky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280051 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282325 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014366 | Currie | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027868 | Doris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060057787 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060925 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070020874 | Xie et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
64-76755 | Mar 1989 | JP |
2003-128494 | Aug 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050164477 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10667603 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 11048739 | US |