Strained silicon on relaxed sige film with uniform misfit dislocation density

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7964865
  • Patent Number
    7,964,865
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 3, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 21, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
A method for forming a semiconductor substrate structure is provided. A compressively strained SiGe layer is formed on a silicon substrate. Atoms are ion-implanted onto the SiGe layer to cause end-of-range damage. Annealing is performed to relax the strained SiGe layer. During the annealing, interstitial dislocation loops are formed as uniformly distributed in the SiGe layer. The interstitial dislocation loops provide a basis for nucleation of misfit dislocations between the SiGe layer and the silicon substrate. Since the interstitial dislocation loops are distributed uniformly, the misfit locations are also distributed uniformly, thereby relaxing the SiGe layer. A tensilely strained silicon layer is formed on the relaxed SiGe layer.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The invention relates to methods for manufacturing semiconductor devices having improved device performances, and, more particularly to methods for forming a relaxed SiGe film.


2. Background Description


The escalating requirements for ultra large scale integration semiconductor devices require ever increasing high performance and density of transistors. With device scaling-down reaching limits, the trend has been to seek new materials and methods that enhance device performance. One of the most direct methods to increase performance is through mobility enhancement. It has been known that stress or strain applied to semiconductor lattice structures can improve device performances. For example, an N type device formed on an biaxially strained (e.g., an expanded lattice) silicon substrate exhibits better device performances than other N type devices formed on a silicon substrate without strain (or the expanded lattice structure). Also, a P type device having longitudinal (in the direction of current flow) compressive strain exhibits better device performance than other P type devices formed on a silicon substrate without such strain. The P type device also exhibits enhanced performance with very large biaxial tensile strain.


Alternatively, it has been known that a device exhibits better performance characteristics when formed on a silicon layer (or cap) that is epitaxially grown on another epitaxially grown SiGe layer that has relaxed on top of the silicon substrate. In this system, the silicon cap experiences biaxial tensile strain. When epitaxially grown on silicon, an unrelaxed SiGe layer will have a lattice constant that conforms to that of the silicon substrate. Upon relaxation (through a high temperature process for example) the SiGe lattice constant approaches that of its intrinsic lattice constant which is larger than that of silicon. A fully relaxed SiGe layer has a lattice constant close to that of its intrinsic value. When the silicon layer is epitaxially grown thereon, the silicon layer conforms to the larger lattice constant of the relaxed SiGe layer and this applies physical biaxial stress (e.g., expansion) to the silicon layer being formed thereon. This physical stress applied to the silicon layer is beneficial to the devices (e.g., CMOS devices) formed thereon because the expanded silicon layer increases N type device performance and higher Ge concentration in the SiGe layer improves P type device performances.


Relaxation in SiGe on silicon substrates occurs through the formation of misfit dislocations. For a perfectly relaxed substrate, one can envision a grid of misfit dislocations equally spaced that relieve the stress. The misfit dislocations facilitate the lattice constant in the SiGe layer to seek its intrinsic value by providing extra half-planes of silicon in the substrate. The mismatch strain across the SiGe/silicon interface is then accommodated and the SiGe lattice constant is allowed to get larger.


However, the problem with this conventional approach is that it requires a multi-layered SiGe buffer layer that is very thick (e.g., a thickness of approximately 5000 Å to 15000 Å) to achieve misfit dislocations on its surface portion while avoiding threading dislocations between the SiGe layer and the silicon substrate layer, thereby achieving a relaxed SiGe structure on the surface of the multi-layered SiGe layer. Also, this approach significantly increases manufacturing time and costs. Further, the thick graded SiGe buffer layer cannot be easily applied to silicon-on-insulator (SOI). This is because for silicon-on-insulator the silicon thickness has to be below 1500 Å for the benefits of SOI to be valid. The SiGe buffer layer structure is too thick.


Another problem is that misfit dislocations formed between the SiGe layer and the silicon epitaxial layer are random and highly non-uniform and cannot be easily controlled due to heterogeneous nucleation that cannot be easily controlled. Also, misfit dislocation densities are significantly different from one place to another. Thus, the physical stress derived from the non-uniform misfit dislocations are apt to be also highly non-uniform in the silicon epitaxial layer, and this non-uniform stress causes non-uniform benefits for performance with larger variability. Further at those locations where misfit density are high, the defects degrade device performances through shorting device terminals and through other significant leakage mechanisms.


Therefore, there is a need for effective methodology for manufacturing a relaxed SiGe layer.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In an aspect of the invention, a method is provided for manufacturing semiconductor device. First, a compressively strained SiGe layer is formed on a silicon substrate. Atoms are ion-implanted to form uniformly distributed interstitial dislocation loops in the SiGe layer. Annealing is performed to form uniformly distributed misfit dislocations at the SiGe-silicon interface.


In another aspect of the invention, a method for forming a semiconductor substrate is provided. A SiGe layer is formed on a silicon substrate and the SiGe layer is compressively strained. Atoms are controllably ion-implanted onto the SiGe layer causing univofrmly distributed end-of-range damage therein. Annealing is performed to form interstitial dislocation loops uniformly distributed in the SiGe layer. The uniformly distributed interstitial dislocation loops nucleate uniformly distributed misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer. An expansively strained silicon layer is formed on the SiGe layer.


Yet another aspect of the invention is a semiconductor device having a silicon substrate. A relaxed SiGe layer is formed on the silicon substrate and the SiGe layer includes uniformly distributed misfit dislocations. An expansively strained silicon layer is formed on the relaxed SiGe layer.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:



FIGS. 1 to 4 depict sequential phases of the method according to an embodiment of the invention; and



FIG. 5 depicts a side view of a semiconductor device structure shown in FIG. 3 after annealing is performed.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a method that provides an expansively strained silicon layer, which improves performances of the devices formed thereon. The strained silicon layer is formed by epitaxially growing silicon on a relaxed SiGe layer. The relaxed SiGe layer is formed by forming uniformly distributed misfit dislocations in an initially compressively strained SiGe layer formed on a silicon substrate. Nucleation of the misfit dislocations is heavily influenced by interstitial dislocation loops. Thus, in the invention, the interstitial dislocation loops are formed at the desired locations in the SiGe layer with desired densities, in order to control the dislocations and densities of nucleation of the misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer. Thus, the compressively strained SiGe layer is relaxed by nucleation of the misfit dislocations. Since the SiGe layer is relaxed, the silicon layer formed thereon is formed as expansively conforming to the larger lattice constant of the relaxed SiGe layer. As a result, the silicon layer is biaxially tensilely strained, and this increases performances of the devices formed thereon.



FIG. 1 shows a SiGe layer 12 formed on a silicon substrate 10. In an embodiment, the SiGe layer 12 is formed by epitaxially growing at a thickness of approximately 100 Å to 10000 Å. Thus, contrary to conventional art, the invention does not require formation of a thick multi-layered SiGe layer to achieve a relaxed SiGe layer. The silicon substrate 10 has a lattice constant that is less that that of intrinsic unrelaxed SiGe. Thus, when the SiGe layer 12 is epitaxially grown, the SiGe layer 12 is biaxially compressively strained because the underlying silicon layer constrains the epitaxial growth such that the larger lattice structure of the SiGe layer 12 is harmonized with the smaller lattice structure of the silicon substrate 10.


In FIG. 2, atoms are controllably ion-implanted, as shown by arrows “A”, onto the SiGe layer 12 at implantation concentration and energy sufficient to amorphize an upper surface portion of the SiGe layer 12. Any neutral amorphization atoms, such as Ge or Si, can be used as the ion-implantation atoms. As the result, an amorphous layer 14 is formed on the upper surface region of the SiGe layer 12. In an embodiment, the amorphous layer 14 is formed to have a thickness of approximately 30 Å to 300 Å, which is approximately one third of the SiGe layer thickness. Noble gases such as He, Ar, etc. could also be used in lieu of Ge or Si, but the dosage has to be high which may lead to other unwanted leakage issues.


During the ion-implantation, the atoms collide with the lattice structure of the SiGe layer 12 and cause amorphization. In an embodiment, for the amorphization, Ge is ion-implanted at an impurity concentration of approximately 3×1014 atoms/cm2. End-of-range damage to the SiGe layer 12 is formed upon annealing of the amorphized silicon/SiGe material. The end of range damage consists of interstitial loops that coalesce from the damage during annealing. They are relatively stable and have sizes of approximately 100 Å to 500 Å, and have a relatively uniform density.


The end-of-range damage is embedded in the SiGe layer 12 from the interface between the amorphous region 14 and the SiGe layer 12 down towards the interface between the SiGe layer 12 and the silicon substrate 10. The locations of end-of-range damage can be accurately modulated by controlling the ion-implantation concentration and energy. Thus, when the atoms are ion-implanted to form the amorphous layer 14, the implantation concentration and energy are controllably selected such that the end-of-range damage is uniformly distributed in the SiGe layer 12. For example, the atoms are ion-implanted at an implantation concentration of approximately 1×1014 atoms/cm2 to 1×1016 atoms/cm2 at implantation energy of approximately 5 KeV to 100 KeV. As will be explained later, the end-of-range damage provides a basis for nucleation of misfit dislocations.


Subsequently, annealing is performed for recrystallization of the amorphous layer 14. In an embodiment, the annealing is performed at a temperature of approximately 500° C. to 1100° C. for approximately 1 second to 30 minutes. Also, the annealing can be performed via spike, rapid thermal or other annealing techniques. As shown in FIG. 3, upon performing annealing, end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16 are formed corresponding to the end-of-range damage. In an embodiment, a density of the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16 is approximately 1×105 loops/cm2 to 1×1012 loops/cm2.


While the SiGe layer 12 is annealed and the amorphous layer 14 is recrystallized, the compressive strain applied to the SiGe layer 12 is relieved and the SiGe layer 12 is relaxed, as shown by arrows “B” in FIG. 3. When the strained SiGe layer 12 is relaxed, the relaxation of the SiGe layer 12 causes misfit dislocations at the interface between the SiGe layer 12 and the silicon substrate 10. Here, when the misfit dislocations are being created, the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16 provide a basis for nucleation of the misfit dislocations. Thus, the misfit dislocations 18 are nucleated under the heavy influence of the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16 that are uniformly distributed at the desired locations and at the desired density.


In an embodiment, a density of the misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer is approximately 1×105 #/cm2 to 1×1012 #/cm2. An example is shown in FIG. 4, in which the misfit dislocations 18 are formed uniformly along the lines connecting two neighboring end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16. FIG. 4 further shows the misfit dislocations 18 forming a grid that relaxes the compressive stress uniformly. According to the invention, the relaxation can be increased by creating more misfit dislocations. This is achieved by increasing density of the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16 since nucleation of the misfit dislocations is heavily dictated by the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16.



FIG. 5 shows a silicon layer 20 formed on the relaxed SiGe layer 12. In an embodiment, the silicon layer 20 is formed by epitaxially growing on the SiGe layer 12. Since the relaxed SiGe layer 12 has a higher lattice constant than that of silicon, the silicon layer 20 is formed on the SiGe layer 12 as conforming to the higher lattice constant of the relaxed SiGe layer 12. This applies biaxial tensile strain to the silicon layer 20.


Although it is not shown, conventional processing steps are performed to form devices on the biaxially strained silicon tensile layer 20. For example, a gate structure is formed on the silicon layer 20 with a gate oxide therebetween. Source and drain regions are formed in the expansively strained silicon layer 20 by ion-implanting impurity atoms. The tensilely strained silicon layer performs as a substrate and improves device performances.


In the embodiment described above, the atoms are ion-implanted after the SiGe layer 12 is formed on the substrate 10. However, the atoms can be ion-implanted onto the silicon substrate 10 before the SiGe layer 12 is formed. Alternatively, the ion-implantation can be performed after the silicon layer 20 is formed on the SiGe layer 12. In these cases, the degree of the silicon relaxation would still increase the silicon relaxation.


As previously explained so far, according to the invention, the silicon layer 20 is expansively strained due to the relaxation of the underlying SiGe layer 12. The relaxation is caused by forming uniformly distributed misfit dislocations in the compressively strained SiGe layer 12. Since the misfit dislocations are nucleated under the heavy influence of the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16, in the invention, the end-of-range interstitial dislocation loops 16 are formed at the desired locations and at the desired density. The uniform distribution of the interstitial dislocation loops 16 is achieved by controllably ion-implanting atoms so as to form uniformly-distributed end-of-range damage to the SiGe layer. Also, the present invention does not require to form a thick multi-layered SiGe layer to avoid thread dislocations. Accordingly, the invention provides time and cost effective methodology for manufacturing an tensilely strained silicon layer.


While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor device comprising: a silicon substrate;a relaxed SiGe layer formed on the silicon substrate, said SiGe layer including uniformly distributed misfit dislocations at an interface between the silicon substrate and the relaxed SiGe layer; anda tensilely strained silicon layer formed on the relaxed SiGe layer.
  • 2. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the density of the misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer is approximately 1×105 loops/cm2 to 1×1012 loops/cm2.
  • 3. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the misfit dislocations are arranged in a shape of grid when viewed from above.
  • 4. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the SiGe layer is formed at a thickness of approximately 100 Å to 10000 Å.
  • 5. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the density of misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer, measured at an interface between the silicon substrate and the SiGe layer, is approximately 1×105 loops/cm2 to 1×1012 loops/cm2.
  • 6. The semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein the density of misfit dislocations in the SiGe layer is approximately 1×105 loops/cm2 to 1×1012 loops/cm2.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/667,603, filed on Sep. 23, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,872,641 which is now incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
3602841 McGroddy Aug 1971 A
4665415 Esaki et al. May 1987 A
4853076 Tsaur et al. Aug 1989 A
4855245 Neppl et al. Aug 1989 A
4860067 Jackson et al. Aug 1989 A
4952524 Lee et al. Aug 1990 A
4958213 Eklund et al. Sep 1990 A
5006913 Sugahara et al. Apr 1991 A
5060030 Hoke Oct 1991 A
5081513 Jackson et al. Jan 1992 A
5097308 Salih Mar 1992 A
5102810 Salih Apr 1992 A
5108843 Ohtaka et al. Apr 1992 A
5134085 Gilgen et al. Jul 1992 A
5310446 Konishi et al. May 1994 A
5354695 Leedy Oct 1994 A
5371399 Burroughes et al. Dec 1994 A
5391510 Hsu et al. Feb 1995 A
5395770 Miki et al. Mar 1995 A
5459346 Asakawa et al. Oct 1995 A
5471948 Burroughes et al. Dec 1995 A
5557122 Shrivastava et al. Sep 1996 A
5561302 Candelaria Oct 1996 A
5565697 Asakawa et al. Oct 1996 A
5571741 Leedy Nov 1996 A
5592007 Leedy Jan 1997 A
5592018 Leedy Jan 1997 A
5670798 Schetzina Sep 1997 A
5679965 Schetzina Oct 1997 A
5683934 Candelaria Nov 1997 A
5840593 Leedy Nov 1998 A
5861651 Brasen et al. Jan 1999 A
5880040 Sun et al. Mar 1999 A
5888885 Xie Mar 1999 A
5940736 Brady et al. Aug 1999 A
5946559 Leedy Aug 1999 A
5989978 Peidous Nov 1999 A
6008126 Leedy Dec 1999 A
6025280 Brady et al. Feb 2000 A
6039803 Fitzgerald et al. Mar 2000 A
6046464 Schetzina Apr 2000 A
6066545 Doshi et al. May 2000 A
6090684 Ishitsuka et al. Jul 2000 A
6107143 Park et al. Aug 2000 A
6117722 Wuu et al. Sep 2000 A
6133071 Nagai Oct 2000 A
6165383 Chou Dec 2000 A
6221735 Manley et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228694 Doyle et al. May 2001 B1
6246095 Brady et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255169 Li et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261964 Wu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274444 Wang Aug 2001 B1
6281532 Doyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6284626 Kim Sep 2001 B1
6313016 Kibbel et al. Nov 2001 B1
6361885 Chou Mar 2002 B1
6362082 Doyle et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368931 Kuhn et al. Apr 2002 B1
6403975 Brunner et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406973 Lee Jun 2002 B1
6476462 Shimizu et al. Nov 2002 B2
6483171 Forbes et al. Nov 2002 B1
6493497 Ramdani et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498358 Lach et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501121 Yu et al. Dec 2002 B1
6506652 Jan et al. Jan 2003 B2
6509618 Jan et al. Jan 2003 B2
6521964 Jan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531369 Ozkan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6531740 Bosco et al. Mar 2003 B2
6583015 Fitzgerald et al. Jun 2003 B2
6593191 Fitzgerald Jul 2003 B2
6717216 Doris et al. Apr 2004 B1
6734527 Xiang May 2004 B1
6825529 Chidambarrao et al. Nov 2004 B2
6831292 Currie et al. Dec 2004 B2
6974981 Chidambarrao et al. Dec 2005 B2
6977194 Belyansky et al. Dec 2005 B2
7015082 Doris et al. Mar 2006 B2
7049627 Vineis et al. May 2006 B2
20020063292 Armstrong et al. May 2002 A1
20020074598 Doyle et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020086472 Roberds et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020090791 Doyle et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030032261 Yeh et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040158 Saitoh Feb 2003 A1
20030107032 Yoshida Jun 2003 A1
20030143783 Maa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040031979 Lochtefeld et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040040493 Vineis et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040150006 Aulnette et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040238914 Deshpande et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262784 Doris et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050040460 Chidambarrao et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050082634 Doris et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093030 Doris et al. May 2005 A1
20050098829 Doris et al. May 2005 A1
20050106799 Doris et al. May 2005 A1
20050145954 Zhu et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050148146 Doris et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050194699 Belyansky et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050236668 Zhu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245017 Belyansky et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050280051 Chidambarrao et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050282325 Belyansky et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060014366 Currie Jan 2006 A1
20060027868 Doris et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060057787 Doris et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060060925 Doris et al. Mar 2006 A1
20070020874 Xie et al. Jan 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
64-76755 Mar 1989 JP
2003-128494 Aug 2003 JP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050164477 A1 Jul 2005 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10667603 Sep 2003 US
Child 11048739 US