Patent Grant
8168356
The presently disclosed embodiments are directed to an imaging member used in electrostatography with improved functionality and life. More particularly, the embodiments pertain to a structurally simplified flexible electrophotographic imaging member without the need of an anticurl back coating layer and a process for making and using the member.
In electrophotographic or electrostatographic reproducing apparatuses, including digital, image on image, and contact electrostatic printing apparatuses, a light image of an original to be copied is typically recorded in the form of an electrostatic latent image upon a photosensitive member and the latent image is subsequently rendered visible by the application of electroscopic thermoplastic resin particles and pigment particles, or toner. Flexible electrostatographic imaging members are well known in the art. Typical flexible electrostatographic imaging members include, for example: (1) electrophotographic imaging member belts (belt photoreceptors) commonly utilized in electrophotographic (xerographic) processing systems; (2) electroreceptors such as ionographic imaging member belts for electrographic imaging systems; and (3) intermediate toner image transfer members such as an intermediate toner image transferring belt which is used to remove the toner images from a photoreceptor surface and then transfer the very images onto a receiving paper. The flexible electrostatographic imaging members may be seamless or seamed belts; and seamed belts are usually formed by cutting a rectangular sheet from a web, overlapping opposite ends, and welding the overlapped ends together to form a welded seam. Typical electrophotographic imaging member belts include a charge transport layer and a charge generating layer on one side of a supporting substrate layer and an anticurl back coating coated onto the opposite side of the substrate layer. A typical electrographic imaging member belt does, however, have a more simple material structure; it includes a dielectric imaging layer on one side of a supporting substrate and an anti-curl back coating on the opposite side of the substrate to render flatness. Although the scope of the present invention covers the preparation of all types of flexible electrostatographic imaging members, however for reason of simplicity, the discussion hereinafter will focus and be represented only on flexible electrophotographic imaging members.
Electrophotographic flexible imaging members may include a photoconductive layer including a single layer or composite layers. Since typical flexible electrophotographic imaging members exhibit undesirable upward imaging member curling, an anti-curl back coating, applied to the backside, is required to balance the curl. Thus, the application of anti-curl back coating is necessary to provide the appropriate imaging member belt with desirable flatness.
One type of composite photoconductive layer used in xerography is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,265,990 which describes a photosensitive member having at least two electrically operative layers. One layer comprises a photoconductive layer which is capable of photogenerating holes and injecting the photogenerated holes into a contiguous charge transport layer. Generally, where the two electrically operative layers are supported on a conductive layer, the photoconductive layer is sandwiched between a contiguous charge transport layer and the supporting conductive layer. Alternatively, the charge transport layer may be sandwiched between the supporting electrode and a photoconductive layer. Photosensitive members having at least two electrically operative layers, as disclosed above, provide excellent electrostatic latent images when charged in the dark with a uniform negative electrostatic charge, exposed to a light image and thereafter developed with finely divided electroscopic marking particles. The resulting toner image is usually transferred to a suitable receiving member such as paper or to an intermediate transfer member which thereafter transfers the image to a receiving member such as paper.
In the case where the charge generating layer is sandwiched between the outermost exposed charge transport layer and the electrically conducting layer, the outer surface of the charge transport layer is charged negatively and the conductive layer is charged positively. The charge generating layer then should be capable of generating electron hole pair when exposed image wise and inject only the holes through the charge transport layer. In the alternate case when the charge transport layer is sandwiched between the charge generating layer and the conductive layer, the outer surface of the charge generating layer is charged positively while conductive layer is charged negatively and the holes are injected through from the charge generating layer to the charge transport layer. The charge transport layer should be able to transport the holes with as little trapping of charge as possible. In flexible imaging member belt such as photoreceptor, the charge conductive layer may be a thin coating of metal on a flexible substrate support layer.
As more advanced, higher speed electrophotographic copiers, duplicators and printers were developed, however, degradation of image quality was encountered during extended cycling. The complex, highly sophisticated duplicating and printing systems operating at very high speeds have placed stringent requirements including narrow operating limits on photoreceptors. For example, the numerous layers used in many modern photoconductive imaging members must be highly flexible, adhere well to adjacent layers, and exhibit predictable electrical characteristics within narrow operating limits to provide excellent toner images over many thousands of cycles. One type of multilayered photoreceptor that has been employed as a belt in electrophotographic imaging systems comprises a substrate, a conductive layer, an optional blocking layer, an optional adhesive layer, a charge generating layer, a charge transport layer and a conductive ground strip layer adjacent to one edge of the imaging layers, and may optionally include an overcoat layer over the imaging layer(s) to provide abrasion/wear protection. In such a photoreceptor, it does usually further comprise an anticurl back coating layer on the side of the substrate opposite the side carrying the conductive layer, support layer, blocking layer, adhesive layer, charge generating layer, charge transport layer, and other layers.
Typical negatively-charged imaging member belts, such as flexible photoreceptor belt designs, are made of multiple layers comprising a flexible supporting substrate, a conductive ground plane, a charge blocking layer, an optional adhesive layer, a charge generating layer, a charge transport layer. The charge transport layer is usually the last layer, or the outermost layer, to be coated and is applied by solution coating then followed by drying the wet applied coating at elevated temperatures of about 120° C., and finally cooling it down to ambient room temperature of about 25° C. When a production web stock of several thousand feet of coated multilayered photoreceptor material is obtained after finishing solution application of the charge transport layer coating and through drying/cooling process, upward curling of the multilayered photoreceptor is observed. This upward curling is a consequence of thermal contraction mismatch between the charge transport layer and the substrate support. Since the charge transport layer in a typical photoreceptor device has a coefficient of thermal contraction approximately 3.7 times greater than that of the flexible substrate support, the charge transport layer does therefore have a larger dimensional shrinkage than that of the substrate support as the imaging member web stock cools down to ambient room temperature. The exhibition of imaging member curling after completion of charge transport layer coating is due to the consequence of the heating/cooling processing step, according to the mechanism: (1) as the web stock carrying the wet applied charge transport layer is dried at elevated temperature, dimensional contraction does occur when the wet charge transport layer coating is losing its solvent during 120° C. elevated temperature drying, but at 120° C. the charge transport layer remains as a viscous flowing liquid after losing its solvent. Since its glass transition temperature (Tg) is at 85° C., the charge transport layer after losing of solvent will flow to re-adjust itself, release internal stress, and maintain its dimension stability; (2) as the charge transport layer now in the viscous liquid state is cooling down further and reaching its glass transition temperature (Tg) at 85° C., the CTL instantaneously solidifies and adheres to the charge generating layer because it has then transformed itself from being a viscous liquid into a solid layer at its Tg; and (3) eventual cooling down the solid charge transport layer of the imaging member web from 85° C. down to 25° C. room ambient will then cause the charge transport layer to contract more than the substrate support since it has about 3.7 times greater thermal coefficient of dimensional contraction than that of the substrate support. This differential in dimensional contraction results in internal tension strain to build up in the charge transport layer which therefore, at this instant, pulls the imaging member upward resulting in imaging member curling. If unrestrained at this point, the imaging member web stock will spontaneously curl upwardly into a 1.5-inch tube. To offset the curling, an anticurl back coating is need and applied to the backside of the flexible substrate support, opposite to the side having the charge transport layer, to render the imaging member web stock with desired flatness.
Curling of a photoreceptor web is undesirable because it hinders fabrication of the web into cut sheets and subsequent welding into a belt. An anticurl back coating, having an equal counter curling effect but in the opposite direction to the applied imaging layer(s), is applied to the reverse side of substrate support of the active imaging member to balance the curl caused by the mismatch of the thermal contraction coefficient between the substrate and the charge transport layer, resulting in greater charge transport layer dimensional shrinkage than that of the substrate. Although the application of an anticurl back coating is effective to counter and remove the curl, nonetheless the resulting imaging member in flat configuration does tension the charge transport layer creating an internal build-in strain of about 0.27% in the layer. The magnitude of CTL internal build-in strain is very undesirable, because it is additive to the induced bending strain of an imaging member belt as the belt bends and flexes over each belt support roller during dynamic fatigue belt cyclic motion under a normal machine electrophotiographic imaging function condition in the field. The summation of the internal strain and the cumulative fatigue bending strain sustained in the charge transport layer has been found to exacerbate the early onset of charge transport layer cracking, preventing the belt to reach its targeted functional imaging life. Moreover, imaging member belt employing an anticurl backing coating has additional total belt thickness to thereby increase charge transport layer bending strain and speed up belt cycling fatigue charge transport layer cracking. The cracks formed in the charge transport layer as a result of dynamic belt fatiguing are found to manifest themselves into copy print-out defects, which thereby adversely affect the image quality on the receiving paper.
Various belt function deficiencies have also been observed in the common anticurl back coating formulations used in a typical prior art imaging member belt, such as the anticurl back coating does not always providing satisfying dynamic imaging member belt performance result under a normal machine functioning condition; for example, exhibition of anticurl back coating wear and its propensity to cause electrostatic charging-up are the frequently seen problems to prematurely cut short the service life of a belt and requires its frequent costly replacement in the field. Anticurl back coating wear under the normal imaging member belt machine operational conditions reduces the anticurl back coating thickness, causing the lost of its ability to fully counteract the curl as reflected in exhibition of gradual imaging member belt curling up in the field. Curling is undesirable during imaging belt function because different segments of the imaging surface of the photoconductive member are located at different distances from charging devices, causing non-uniform charging. In addition, developer applicators and the like, during the electrophotographic imaging process, may all adversely affect the quality of the ultimate developed images. For example, non-uniform charging distances can manifest as variations in high background deposits during development of electrostatic latent images near the edges of paper. Since the anticurl back coating is an outermost exposed backing layer and has high surface contact friction when it slides over the machine subsystems of belt support module, such as rollers, stationary belt guiding components, and backer bars, during dynamic belt cyclic function, these mechanical sliding interactions against the belt support module components not only exacerbate anticurl back coating wear, it does also cause the relatively rapid wearing away of the anti-curl produce debris which scatters and deposits on critical machine components such as lenses, corona charging devices and the like, thereby adversely affecting machine performance. Moreover, anticurl back coating abrasion/scratch damage does also produce unbalance forces generation between the charge transport layer and the anticurl back coating to cause micro belt ripples formation during electrophotographic imaging processes, resulting in streak line print defects in output copies to deleteriously impact image printout quality and shorten the imaging member belt functional life.
High contact friction of the anticurl back coating against machine subsystems is further seen to cause the development of electrostatic charge built-up problem. In other machines the electrostatic charge builds up due to contact friction between the anti-curl layer and the backer bars increases the friction and thus requires higher torque to pull the belts. In full color machines with 10 pitches this can be extremely high due to large number of backer bars used. At times, one has to use two drive rollers rather than one which are to be coordinated electronically precisely to keep any possibility of sagging. Static charge built-up in anticurl back coating increases belt drive torque, in some instances, has also been found to result in absolute belt stalling. In other cases, the electrostatic charge build up can be so high as to cause sparking.
Another problem encountered in the conventional belt photoreceptors using a bisphenol A polycarbonate anticurl back coating that are extensively cycled in precision electrostatographic imaging machines utilizing belt supporting backer bars, is an audible squeaky sound generated due to high contact friction interaction between the anticurl back coating and the backer bars. Further, cumulative deposition of anticurl back coating wear debris onto the backer bars may give rise to undesirable defect print marks formed on copies because each debris deposit become a surface protrusion point on the backer bar and locally forces the imaging member belt upwardly to interferes with the toner image development process. On other occasions, the anticurl back coating wear debris accumulation on the backer bars does gradually increase the dynamic contact friction between these two interacting surfaces of anticurl back coating and backer bar, interfering with the duty cycle of the driving motor to a point where the motor eventually stalls and belt cycling prematurely ceases. Additionally, it is important to point out that electrophotographic imaging member belts prepared that required anticurl back coating to provide flatness have more than above list of problems, they do indeed incur additional material and labor cost impact to imaging members' production process.
Thus, electrophotographic imaging members comprising a supporting substrate, having a conductive surface on one side, coated over with at least one photoconductive layer (such as the outermost charge transport layer) and coated on the other side of the supporting substrate with a conventional prior art anticurl back coating that does exhibit deficiencies which are undesirable in advanced automatic, cyclic electrophotographic imaging copiers, duplicators, and printers. While the above mentioned electrophotographic imaging members may be suitable or limited for their intended purposes, further improvement on these imaging members are required. For example, there continues to be the need for improvements in such systems, particularly for an imaging member belt that has sufficiently flatness, reduces friction, has superb wear resistance, provides lubricity to ease belt drive, nil or no wear debris, and eliminates electrostatic charge build-up problem, even in larger printing apparatuses. With many of above mentioned shortcomings and problems associated with electrohotographic imaging members having an anticurl back coating now understood, therefore there is an urgent need to resolve these issues through the development of a methodology for fabricating imaging members that produce improve function and meet future machine imaging member belt life extension need. In the present disclosure, a charge transport layer material reformulation method and process of making a flexible imaging member free of the mentioned deficiencies have been identified and demonstrated through the preparation of anticurl back coating free imaging member. The improved curl-free imaging member without the need of a conventional anticurl back coating suppresses abrasion/wear failure and extend the charge transport layer cracking will be described in detail in the following.
Conventional photoreceptors are disclosed in the following patents, a number of which describe the presence of light scattering particles in the undercoat layers: Yu, U.S. Pat. No. 5,660,961; Yu, U.S. Pat. No. 5,215,839; and Katayama et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,638. The term “photoreceptor” or “photoconductor” is generally used interchangeably with the terms “imaging member.” The term “electrostatographic” includes “electrophotographic” and “xerographic.” The terms “charge transport molecule” are generally used interchangeably with the terms “hole transport molecule.” Yu et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,183,921 issued on Feb. 6, 2001, discloses a crack resistant, curl-free electrophotographic imaging member includes a charge transport layer comprising an active charge transport polymeric tetraaryl-substituted biphenyldiamine and a plasticizer.
Yu, U.S. Pat. No. 6,660,441, issued on Dec. 9, 2003, discloses an electrophotographic imaging member having a substrate support material which eliminates the need of an anticurl backing layer, a substrate support layer and a charge transport layer having a thermal contraction coefficient difference in the range of from about −2×10−5/° C. to about +2×10−5/° C., a substrate support material having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of at least 100° C., wherein the substrate support material is not susceptible to the attack from the charge transport layer coating solution solvent and wherein the substrate support material is represented by two specifically selected polyimides.
In Lin et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,413,835 issued on Aug. 19, 2008, it discloses an electrophotographic imaging member having a thermoplastic charge transport layer, a polycarbonate polymer binder, a particulate dispersion, and a high boiler compatible liquid. The disclosed charge transport layer exhibits enhanced wear resistance, excellent photoelectrical properties, and good print quality.
In U.S. Publication No. 2006/0099525, discloses an imaging member formulated with a liquid carbonate. The imaging electrostatographic member exhibits improved service life.
According to the embodiments, there is provided an imaging member comprising a substrate, a charge generating layer disposed on the substrate, and at least one charge transport layer disposed on the charge generating layer, wherein the charge transport layer comprises a polycarbonate, N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-1,1-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine, and a liquid styrene dimer compound having a high boiling point.
In another embodiment, there is provided an imaging member comprising a substrate, and a single imaging layer disposed on the substrate, wherein the single imaging layer disposed on the substrate has both charge generating and charge transporting capability and further wherein the single imaging layer comprises a polycarbonate, N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-1,1-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine, and a liquid styrene dimer compound having a high boiling point.
In yet another embodiment, there is provided an imaging member comprising a substrate, and a single imaging layer disposed on the substrate, wherein the single imaging layer disposed on the substrate has both charge generating and charge transporting capability and the single imaging layer comprises a polycarbonate, N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-1,1-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine, and a liquid styrene dimer compound having a glass transition temperature in a range of from about 40° C. to about 70° C., and further wherein the imaging member has a diameter of curvature of greater than about 20 inches.
For a better understanding of the present disclosure, reference may be made to the accompanying figures.
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof and which illustrate several embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural and operational changes may be made without departure from the scope of the present invention.
According to aspects illustrated herein, there is a curl-free flexible imaging member comprising a flexible substrate, a conductive ground plane, a hole blocking layer, a charge generation layer, and an outermost charge transport layer without the application of an anti-curl back coating layer disposed onto the substrate on the side opposite of the charge transport layer; wherein, the charge transport layer is formulated to have minima internal build-in strain by incorporation of a suitable liquid plasticizer. To achieve the intended charge transport layer plasticizing result for anticurl back coating free imaging member preparation through reduction of charge transport layer internal strain, a specifically selected high boiler styrene dimer liquid candidate is utilized for present imaging member disclosure application.
The styrene dimer liquid selected is available from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc. and has a molecular structure shown in Formula (I) below:
wherein R1 is selected from the group consisting of H, CH3, CH2CH3, CH═CH2, CH2CH═CH2, CH2OCOOCH3, CH2OCOOCH2CH3, and CH2OCOOCH2CH═CH2.
The selection of this specific styrene dimer for imaging member charge transport layer plasticizing is based on the facts that it is (a) high boiler liquids with boiling point exceeding 300° C. so their presence in the charge transport layer to effect plasticizing outcome will be permanent; (b) a liquid totally miscible/compatible with both the charge transporting compound and the polycarbonate binder such that its incorporation into the charge transport layer material matrix for internal strain reduction and effect anticurl back coating elimination should cause no deleterious photoelectrical function of the resulting imaging member; and (c) the presence of double-bond at the molecular terminal can also provide an added benefit of acting as an ozone quencher to protect the polycarbonate binder from chain scission by ozone attack causing pre-mature onset of charge transport layer cracking during imaging member belt machine function in the field. The ozone quenching mechanism is described by the following chemical reaction:
Other styrene dimer liquids that are viable candidates for imaging member charge transport layer plasticizing may also be derived from Formula (I) and included for the present disclosure application. The general molecular structure for these dimer candidates, represented by Formula (II) below, is a variance of the styrene dimer of Formula (I) in which all the hydrogen atoms in the dimer are replaced with fluorine. Therefore, when use to plasticize the charge transport layer, the fluorinated styrene dimer will effect: (i) the lowering of layer's surface energy, (ii) enhancement of toner image transferring efficiency to the receiving paper, (iii) ease of surface cleaning, and (iv) surface lubricity/friction reduction for the imaging member surface abrasion/wear suppression. Formula (II) has the following structure:
wherein R2 is F, CF3, CF2CF3, and CF2OCOOCF3, CF2OCOOCF2CF3, and CF2OCOOCF2CF═CF2.
In one specific embodiment, it is provided a substantially curl-free imaging member comprising a flexible substrate, a conductive ground plane, a hole blocking layer, a charge generation layer, and an outermost charge transport layer comprising a polycarbonate binder, charge transporting molecules, and a liquid styrene dimer.
In another specific embodiment, it is provided a substantially curl-free imaging member comprising a flexible substrate, a conductive ground plane, a hole blocking layer, a charge generation layer, and dual charge transport layers both comprising a polycarbonate binder, a charge transporting molecules, and a liquid styrene dimer.
In yet another specific embodiment, it is provided a substantially curl-free imaging member comprising a flexible substrate, a conductive ground plane, a hole blocking layer, a charge generation layer, and triple charge transport layers with all of which comprising a polycarbonate binder, charge transporting molecules, and a liquid styrene dimer.
In still yet another specific embodiment, it is provided a substantially curl-free imaging member comprising a flexible substrate, a conductive ground plane, a hole blocking layer, a charge generation layer, and multiple charge transport layers with all layers comprising a polycarbonate binder, charge transporting molecules, and a liquid styrene dimer.
An exemplary embodiment of a negatively charged flexible electrophotographic imaging member of the conventional prior art is illustrated in
The layers of the imaging member include, for example, an optional ground strip layer 19 that is applied to one edge of the imaging member to promote electrical continuity with the conductive ground plane 12 through the hole blocking layer 14. The conductive ground plane 12, which is typically a thin metallic layer, for example a 10 nanometer thick titanium coating, may be deposited over the substrate 10 by vacuum deposition or sputtering process. The other layers 14, 16, 18, 19, and 20 are to be separately and sequentially deposited, onto to the surface of conductive ground plane 12 of substrate 10 respectively, as wet coating layer of solutions comprising a solvent, with each layer being dried before deposition of the next subsequent one. An anticurl back coating layer 1 may then be formed on the backside of the support substrate 1. The anticurl back coating 1 is also solution coated, but is applied to the back side (the side opposite to all the other layers) of substrate 1, to render imaging member flatness.
The Substrate
The imaging member support substrate 10 may be opaque or substantially transparent, and may comprise any suitable organic or inorganic material having the requisite mechanical properties. The entire substrate can comprise the same material as that in the electrically conductive surface, or the electrically conductive surface can be merely a coating on the substrate. Any suitable electrically conductive material can be employed. Typical electrically conductive materials include copper, brass, nickel, zinc, chromium, stainless steel, conductive plastics and rubbers, aluminum, semitransparent aluminum, steel, cadmium, silver, gold, zirconium, niobium, tantalum, vanadium, hafnium, titanium, nickel, chromium, tungsten, molybdenum, paper rendered conductive by the inclusion of a suitable material therein or through conditioning in a humid atmosphere to ensure the presence of sufficient water content to render the material conductive, indium, tin, metal oxides, including tin oxide and indium tin oxide, and the like. It could be single metallic compound or dual layers of different metals and or oxides.
The support substrate 10 can also be formulated entirely of an electrically conductive material, or it can be an insulating material including inorganic or organic polymeric materials, such as, MYLAR, a commercially available biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate from DuPont, or polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) available as KALEDEX 2000, with a ground plane layer comprising a conductive titanium or titanium/zirconium coating, otherwise a layer of an organic or inorganic material having a semiconductive surface layer, such as indium tin oxide, aluminum, titanium, and the like, or exclusively be made up of a conductive material such as, aluminum, chromium, nickel, brass, other metals and the like. The thickness of the support substrate depends on numerous factors, including mechanical performance and economic considerations. The substrate may have a number of many different configurations, such as, for example, a plate, a drum, a scroll, an endless flexible belt, and the like. In one embodiment, the substrate is in the form of a seamed flexible belt.
The thickness of the support substrate 10 depends on numerous factors, including flexibility, mechanical performance, and economic considerations. The thickness of the support substrate may range from about 50 micrometers to about 3,000 micrometers. In embodiments of flexible imaging member belt preparation, the thickness of substrate used is from about 50 micrometers to about 200 micrometers for achieving optimum flexibility and to effect tolerable induced imaging member belt surface bending stress/strain when a belt is cycled around small diameter rollers in a machine belt support module, for example, the 19 millimeter diameter rollers.
An exemplary functioning support substrate 10 is not soluble in any of the solvents used in each coating layer solution, has good optical transparency, and is thermally stable up to a high temperature of at least 150° C. A typical support substrate 10 used for imaging member fabrication has a thermal contraction coefficient ranging from about 1×10−5° C. to about 3×10−5° C. and a Young's Modulus of between about 5×10−5 psi (3.5×10−4 Kg/cm2) and about 7×10−5 psi (4.9×10−4 Kg/cm2).
The Conductive Ground Plane
The conductive ground plane layer 12 may vary in thickness depending on the optical transparency and flexibility desired for the electrophotographic imaging member. For a typical flexible imaging member belt, it is desired that the thickness of the conductive ground plane 12 on the support substrate 10, for example, a titanium and/or zirconium conductive layer produced by a sputtered deposition process, is in the range of from about 2 nanometers to about 75 nanometers to effect adequate light transmission through for proper back erase. And preferably, it is from about 10 nanometers to about 20 nanometers to provide optimum combination of electrical conductivity, flexibility, and light transmission. For electrophotographic imaging process employing back exposure erase approach, a conductive ground plane light transparency of at least about 15 percent is generally desirable. The conductive ground plane need is not limited to metals. Nonetheless, the conductive ground plane 12 has usually been an electrically conductive metal layer which may be formed, for example, on the substrate by any suitable coating technique, such as a vacuum depositing or sputtering technique. Typical metals suitable for use as conductive ground plane include aluminum, zirconium, niobium, tantalum, vanadium, hafnium, titanium, nickel, stainless steel, chromium, tungsten, molybdenum, combinations thereof, and the like. Other examples of conductive ground plane 12 may be combinations of materials such as conductive indium tin oxide as a transparent layer for light having a wavelength between about 4000 Angstroms and about 9000 Angstroms or a conductive carbon black dispersed in a plastic binder as an opaque conductive layer. However, in the event where the entire substrate is chosen to be an electrically conductive metal, such as in the case that the electrophotographic imaging process designed to use front exposure erase, the outer surface thereof can perform the function of an electrically conductive ground plane so that a separate electrical conductive layer 12 may be omitted.
For the reason of convenience, all the illustrated embodiments herein after will be described in terms of a substrate layer 10 comprising an insulating material including organic polymeric materials, such as, MYLAR or PEN having a conductive ground plane 12 comprising of an electrically conductive material, such as titanium or titanium/zirconium, coating over the support substrate 10.
The Hole Blocking Layer
A hole blocking layer 14 may then be applied to the conductive ground plane 12 of the support substrate 10. Any suitable positive charge (hole) blocking layer capable of forming an effective barrier to the injection of holes from the adjacent conductive layer 12 into the overlaying photoconductive or photogenerating layer may be utilized. The charge (hole) blocking layer may include polymers, such as, polyvinylbutyral, epoxy resins, polyesters, polysiloxanes, polyamides, polyurethanes, HEMA, hydroxylpropyl cellulose, polyphosphazine, and the like, or may comprise nitrogen containing siloxanes or silanes, or nitrogen containing titanium or zirconium compounds, such as, titanate and zirconate. The hole blocking layer 14 may have a thickness in wide range of from about 5 nanometers to about 10 micrometers depending on the type of material chosen for use in a photoreceptor design. Typical hole blocking layer materials include, for example, trimethoxysilyl propylene diamine, hydrolyzed trimethoxysilyl propyl ethylene diamine, N-beta-(aminoethyl)gamma-aminopropyl trimethoxy silane, isopropyl 4-aminobenzene sulfonyl di(dodecylbenzene sulfonyl)titanate, isopropyl di(4-aminobenzoyl)isostearoyl titanate, isopropyl tri(N-ethylaminoethylamino)titanate, isopropyl trianthranil titanate, isopropyl tri(N,N-dimethylethylamino)titanate, titanium-4-amino benzene sulfonate oxyacetate, titanium 4-aminobenzoate isostearate oxyacetate, (gamma-aminobutyl)methyl diethoxysilane which has the formula [H2N(CH2)4]CH3Si(OCH3)2, and (gamma-aminopropyl)methyl diethoxysilane, which has the formula [H2N(CH2)3]CH33Si(OCH3)2, and combinations thereof, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,338,387; 4,286,033; and 4,291,110, incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. A preferred hole blocking layer comprises a reaction product between a hydrolyzed silane or mixture of hydrolyzed silanes and the oxidized surface of a metal ground plane layer. The oxidized surface inherently forms on the outer surface of most metal ground plane layers when exposed to air after deposition. This combination enhances electrical stability at low RH. Other suitable charge blocking layer polymer compositions are also described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,244,762 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. These include vinyl hydroxyl ester and vinyl hydroxy amide polymers wherein the hydroxyl groups have been partially modified to benzoate and acetate esters which modified polymers are then blended with other unmodified vinyl hydroxy ester and amide unmodified polymers. An example of such a blend is a 30 mole percent benzoate ester of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) blended with the parent polymer poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Still other suitable charge blocking layer polymer compositions are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,988,597, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. These include polymers containing an alkyl acrylamidoglycolate alkyl ether repeat unit. An example of such an alkyl acrylamidoglycolate alkyl ether containing polymer is the copolymer poly(methyl acrylamidoglycolate methyl ether-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). The disclosures of these U.S. patents are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The hole blocking layer 14 can be continuous or substantially continuous and may have a thickness of less than about 10 micrometers because greater thicknesses may lead to undesirably high residual voltage. In aspects of the exemplary embodiment, a blocking layer of from about 0.005 micrometers to about 2 micrometers gives optimum electrical performance. The blocking layer may be applied by any suitable conventional technique, such as, spraying, dip coating, draw bar coating, gravure coating, silk screening, air knife coating, reverse roll coating, vacuum deposition, chemical treatment, and the like. For convenience in obtaining thin layers, the blocking layer may be applied in the form of a dilute solution, with the solvent being removed after deposition of the coating by conventional techniques, such as, by vacuum, heating, and the like. Generally, a weight ratio of blocking layer material and solvent of between about 0.05:100 to about 5:100 is satisfactory for spray coating.
The Adhesive Interface Layer
An optional separate adhesive interface layer 16 may be provided. In the embodiment illustrated in
Any suitable solvent or solvent mixtures may be employed to form a coating solution of the polyester for the adhesive interface layer 36. Typical solvents include tetrahydrofuran, toluene, monochlorbenzene, methylene chloride, cyclohexanone, and the like, and mixtures thereof. Any other suitable and conventional technique may be used to mix and thereafter apply the adhesive layer coating mixture to the hole blocking layer. Typical application techniques include spraying, dip coating, roll coating, wire wound rod coating, and the like. Drying of the deposited wet coating may be effected by any suitable conventional process, such as oven drying, infra red radiation drying, air drying, and the like.
The adhesive interface layer 16 may have a thickness of from about 0.01 micrometers to about 900 micrometers after drying. In embodiments, the dried thickness is from about 0.03 micrometers to about 1 micrometer.
The Charge Generating Layer
The photogenerating (e.g., charge generating) layer 18 may thereafter be applied to the adhesive layer 16. Any suitable charge generating binder layer 18 including a photogenerating/photoconductive material, which may be in the form of particles and dispersed in a film forming binder, such as an inactive resin, may be utilized. Examples of photogenerating materials include, for example, inorganic photoconductive materials such as amorphous selenium, trigonal selenium, and selenium alloys selected from the group consisting of selenium-tellurium, selenium-tellurium-arsenic, selenium arsenide and mixtures thereof, and organic photoconductive materials including various phthalocyanine pigments such as the X-form of metal free phthalocyanine, metal phthalocyanines such as vanadyl phthalocyanine and copper phthalocyanine, hydroxy gallium phthalocyanines, chlorogallium phthalocyanines, titanyl phthalocyanines, quinacridones, dibromo anthanthrone pigments, benzimidazole perylene, substituted 2,4-diamino-triazines, polynuclear aromatic quinones, and the like dispersed in a film forming polymeric binder. Selenium, selenium alloy, benzimidazole perylene, and the like and mixtures thereof may be formed as a continuous, homogeneous photogenerating layer. Benzimidazole perylene compositions are well known and described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,587,189, the entire disclosure thereof being incorporated herein by reference. Multi-photogenerating layer compositions may be utilized where a photoconductive layer enhances or reduces the properties of the photogenerating layer. Other suitable photogenerating materials known in the art may also be utilized, if desired. The photogenerating materials selected should be sensitive to activating radiation having a wavelength between about 400 and about 900 nm during the imagewise radiation exposure step in an electrophotographic imaging process to form an electrostatic latent image. For example, hydroxygallium phthalocyanine absorbs light of a wavelength of from about 370 to about 950 nanometers, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,756,245.
Any suitable inactive resin materials may be employed as a binder in the photogenerating layer 18, including those described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,121,006, the entire disclosure thereof being incorporated herein by reference. Typical organic resinous binders include thermoplastic and thermosetting resins such as one or more of polycarbonates, polyesters, polyamides, polyurethanes, polystyrenes, polyarylethers, polyarylsulfones, polybutadienes, polysulfones, polyethersulfones, polyethylenes, polypropylenes, polyimides, polymethylpentenes, polyphenylene sulfides, polyvinyl butyral, polyvinyl acetate, polysiloxanes, polyacrylates, polyvinyl acetals, polyamides, polyimides, amino resins, phenylene oxide resins, terephthalic acid resins, epoxy resins, phenolic resins, polystyrene and acrylonitrile copolymers, polyvinylchloride, vinylchloride and vinyl acetate copolymers, acrylate copolymers, alkyd resins, cellulosic film formers, poly(amideimide), styrene-butadiene copolymers, vinylidenechloride/vinylchloride copolymers, vinylacetate/vinylidene chloride copolymers, styrene-alkyd resins, and the like.
An exemplary film forming polymer binder is PCZ-400 (poly(4,4′-dihydroxy-diphenyl-1-1-cyclohexane) which has a MW=40,000 and is available from Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Corporation.
The photogenerating material can be present in the resinous binder composition in various amounts. Generally, from about 5 percent by volume to about 90 percent by volume of the photogenerating material is dispersed in about 10 percent by volume to about 95 percent by volume of the resinous binder, and more specifically from about 20 percent by volume to about 30 percent by volume of the photo generating material is dispersed in about 70 percent by volume to about 80 percent by volume of the resinous binder composition.
The photogenerating layer 18 containing the photogenerating material and the resinous binder material generally ranges in thickness of from about 0.1 micrometer to about 5 micrometers, for example, from about 0.3 micrometers to about 3 micrometers when dry. The photogenerating layer thickness is generally related to binder content. Higher binder content compositions generally employ thicker layers for photogeneration.
The Ground Strip Layer
Other layers such as conventional ground strip layer 19 including, for example, conductive particles dispersed in a film forming binder may be applied to one edge of the imaging member to promote electrical continuity with the conductive ground plane 12 through the hole blocking layer 14. Ground strip layer may include any suitable film forming polymer binder and electrically conductive particles. Typical ground strip materials include those enumerated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,664,995, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. The ground strip layer 19 may have a thickness from about 7 micrometers to about 42 micrometers, for example, from about 14 micrometers to about 23 micrometers.
The Charge Transport Layer
The charge transport layer 20 is thereafter applied over the charge generating layer 18 and become, as shown in
The charge transport layer 20 may include any suitable charge transport component or activating compound useful as an additive molecularly dispersed in an electrically inactive polymeric material to form a solid solution and thereby making this material electrically active. The charge transport component may be added to a film forming polymeric material which is otherwise incapable of supporting the injection of photo generated holes from the generation material and incapable of allowing the transport of these holes there through. This converts the electrically inactive polymeric material to a material capable of supporting the injection of photogenerated holes from the charge generation layer 18 and capable of allowing the transport of these holes through the charge transport layer 20 in order to discharge the surface charge on the charge transport layer. The charge transport component typically comprises small molecules of an organic compound which cooperate to transport charge between molecules and ultimately to the surface of the charge transport layer.
Any suitable inactive resin binder soluble in methylene chloride, chlorobenzene, or other suitable solvent may be employed in the charge transport layer. Exemplary binders include polyesters, polyvinyl butyrals, polycarbonates, polystyrene, polyvinyl formals, and combinations thereof. The polymer binder used for the charge transport layers may be, for example, selected from the group consisting of polycarbonates, poly(vinyl carbazole), polystyrene, polyester, polyarylate, polyacrylate, polyether, polysulfone, combinations thereof, and the like. Exemplary polycarbonates include poly(4,4′-isopropylidene diphenyl carbonate), poly(4,4′-diphenyl-1,1′-cyclohexane carbonate), and combinations thereof. The molecular weight of the binder can be for example, from about 20,000 to about 1,500,000. One exemplary binder of this type is a MAKROLON binder, which is available from Bayer AG and comprises poly(4,4′-isopropylidene diphenyl)carbonate having a weight average molecular weight of about 120,000.
Exemplary charge transport components include aromatic polyamines, such as aryl diamines and aryl triamines. Exemplary aromatic diamines include N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(alkylphenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4-diamines, such as mTBD, which has the formula (N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis[3-methylphenyl]-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diamine); N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(chlorophenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine; and N,N′-bis-(4-methylphenyl)-N,N′-bis(4-ethylphenyl)-1,1′-3,3′-dimethylbiphenyl)-4,4′-diamine (Ae-16), N,N′-bis-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-4,4′-biphenyl amine (Ae-18), and combinations thereof.
Other suitable charge transport components include pyrazolines, such as 1-[lepidyl-(2)]-3-(p-diethylaminophenyl)-5-(p-diethylaminophenyl)pyrazoline, as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,315,982, 4,278,746, 3,837,851, and 6,214,514, substituted fluorene charge transport molecules, such as 9-(4′-dimethylaminobenzylidene)fluorene, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,245,021 and 6,214,514, oxadiazole transport molecules, such as 2,5-bis(4-diethylaminophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole, pyrazoline, imidazole, triazole, as described, for example in U.S. Pat. No. 3,895,944, hydrazones, such as p-diethylaminobenzaldehyde (diphenylhydrazone), as described, for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,150,987 4,256,821, 4,297,426, 4,338,388, 4,385,106, 4,387,147, 4,399,207, 4,399,208, 6,124,514, and tri-substituted methanes, such as alkyl-bis(N,N-dialkylaminoaryl)methanes, as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,820,989. The disclosures of all of these patents are incorporated herein be reference in their entireties.
The concentration of the charge transport component in layer 20 may be, for example, at least about 5 weight % and may comprise up to about 60 weight %. The concentration or composition of the charge transport component may vary through layer 20, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,033,714; U.S. Pat. No. 6,933,089; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,018,756, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
In one exemplary embodiment, charge transport layer 20 comprises an average of about 10 to about 60 weight percent N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine, and preferably as from about 30 to about 50 weight percent N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine.
The charge transport layer 20 is an insulator to the extent that the electrostatic charge placed on the charge transport layer is not conducted in the absence of illumination at a rate sufficient to prevent formation and retention of an electrostatic latent image thereon. In general, the ratio of the thickness of the charge transport layer 20 to the charge generator layer 18 is maintained from about 2:1 to about 200:1 and in some instances as great as about 400:1.
Additional aspects relate to the inclusion in the charge transport layer 20 of variable amounts of an antioxidant, such as a hindered phenol. Exemplary hindered phenols include octadecyl-3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyhydrociannamate, available as IRGANOX I-1010 from Ciba Specialty Chemicals. The hindered phenol may be present at about 10 weight percent based on the concentration of the charge transport component. Other suitable antioxidants are described, for example, in above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,018,756, incorporated by reference.
In one specific embodiment, the charge transport layer 20 is a solid solution including a charge transport component, such as N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine, molecularly dissolved in a polycarbonate binder, the binder being either a Bisphenol A polycarbonate of poly(4,4′-isopropylidene diphenyl carbonate) or a poly(4,4′-diphenyl-1,1′-cyclohexane carbonate). The Bisphenol A polycarbonate used for typical charge transport layer formulation is MAKROLON which is commercially available from Farbensabricken Bayer A. G and has a molecular weight of about 120,000. The molecular structure of Bisphenol A polycarbonate, poly(4,4′-isopropylidene diphenyl carbonate), is given in Formula (A) below:
wherein n indicates the degree of polymerization. In the alternative, poly(4,4′-diphenyl-1,1′-cyclohexane carbonate) may also be used to for the anticurl back coating in place of MAKROLON. The molecular structure of poly(4,4′-diphenyl-1,1′-cyclohexane carbonate), having a weight average molecular weight of about between about 20,000 and about 200,000, is given in Formula (B) below:
wherein n indicates the degree of polymerization.
The charge transport layer 20 may have a Young's Modulus in the range of from about 2.5×10−5 psi (1.7×10−4 Kg/cm2) to about 4.5×10−5 psi (3.2×10−4 Kg/cm2) and a thermal contraction coefficient of between about 6×10−5° C. and about 8×10−5° C.
Since the charge transport layer 20 can have a substantially greater thermal contraction coefficient constant compared to that of the support substrate 10, the prepared flexible electrophotographic imaging member will exhibit spontaneous upward curling due to the result of larger dimensional contraction in the charge transport layer 20 than the support substrate 10, as the imaging member cools from its TgCTL down to room ambient temperature of 25° C. after the heating/drying processes of the applied wet charge transport layer coating. Therefore, internal tensile pulling strain is build-in in the charge transport layer and can be expressed in equation (1) below:
∈=(αCTL−αsub)(TgCTL−25° C.) (1)
wherein ∈ is the internal strain build-in in the charge transport layer, αCTL and αsub are coefficient of thermal contraction of charge transport layer and substrate respectively, and TgCTL is the glass transition temperature of the charge transport layer.
Therefore, equation (1), had indicated that to suppress or control the imaging member upward curling, decreasing the TgCTL of the charge transport layer is indeed the key to minimize the charge transport layer strain and impact the imaging member flatness.
An anti-curl back coating 1 can be applied to the back side of the support substrate 10 (which is the side opposite the side bearing the electrically active coating layers) in order to render the prepared imaging member with desired flatness.
The Anticurl Back Coating
Since the charge transport layer 20 is applied by solution coating process, the applied wet film is dried at elevated temperature and then subsequently cooled down to room ambient. The resulting photoreceptor web if, at this point, not restrained, will spontaneously curl upwardly into a 1½ inch tube due to greater dimensional contraction and shrinkage of the Charge transport layer than that of the substrate support layer 10. An anti-curl back coating 1, as the conventional prior art imaging member shown in
Generally, the anticurl back coating 1 comprises a thermoplastic polymer and an adhesion promoter. The thermoplastic polymer, preferably being the same as the polymer binder used in the charge transport layer, is typically a bisphenol A polycarbonate, which along with the addition of an adhesion promoter of polyester are both dissolved in a solvent to form an anticurl back coating solution. The coated anticurl back coating 1 must adhere well to the support substrate 10 to prevent premature layer delamination during imaging member belt machine function in the field.
In a conventional prior art anticurl back coating, an adhesion promoter of copolyester is included in the bisphenol A polycarbonate poly(4,4′-isopropylidene diphenyl carbonate) material matrix to provide adhesion bonding enhancement to the substrate support. Satisfactory adhesion promoter content is from about 0.2 percent to about 20 percent but preferably from about 2 percent to about 10 percent by weight, based on the total weight of the anticurl back coating The adhesion promoter may be any known in the art, such as for example, VITEL PE2200 which is available from Bostik, Inc. (Middleton, Mass.). The anticurl back coating has a thickness that is adequate to counteract the imaging member upward curling and provide flatness; so, it is of from about 5 micrometers to about 50 micrometers, but preferably between about 10 micrometers and about 20 micrometers. A typical, conventional prior art anticurl back coating formulation is a 92:8 ratio of polycarbonate to adhesive.
In the present embodiments, however, the conventional anticurl back coating layer is not needed as the formulated charge transport layer provides the desired flatness.
Referring to
wherein R1 is selected from the group consisting of H, CH3, CH2CH3, CH═CH2, CH2CH═CH2, CH2OCOOCH3, CH2OCOOCH2CH3, and CH2OCOOCH2CH═CH2.
However, the imaging member of
wherein R2 is F, CF3, CF2CF3, and CF2OCOOCF3, CF2OCOOCF2CF3, and CF2OCOOCF2CF═CF2. Formula (II) is the reformulated charge transport layer in the alternative embodiments of present disclosure which comprises the fluorinated styrene dimer liquid incorporation into the same diamine m-TBD and bisphenol A polycarbonate charge transport layer material matrix. The content of the plasticizing liquid carbonate monomer is in a range of from about 3 to about 30 weight percent and preferably between about 10 and about 20 weight percent with respect to the summation weight the diamine m-TBD and the polycarbonate. Therefore, the resulting imaging member having the fluorinated styrene dimer liquid plasticized charge transport layer will effect: the lowering of layer's surface energy, enhancement of toner image transferring efficiency to receiving paper, ease of surface cleaning, and surface lubricity/friction reduction for the imaging member surface abrasion/wear suppression as well.
Additionally, the presence of double-bond at the molecular terminal of Formulas (I) and (II) can also provide an added benefit of acting as an ozone quencher to protect the polycarbonate binder in the charge transport layer from chain scission by ozone attack to cause pre-mature onset of charge transport layer cracking during imaging member belt machine function in the field. The ozone quenching mechanism is described by the following chemical reaction:
Shown in
The plasticized charge transport layer in imaging members of another embodiments, shown in
In the innovative embodiments, the disclosed imaging member shown in
As an alternative to the two discretely separated layers of being a charge transport 20 and a charge generation layers 18 as those described in
Generally, the thickness of the plasticized charge transport layer(s) and the plasticized single layer of all the imaging members, disclosed in
The flexible imaging members of present disclosure, prepared to contain a plasticized charge transport layer but no application of an anticurl backing layer, should have preserved the photoelectrical integrity with respect to each control imaging member. That means having charge acceptance (V0) in a range of from about 750 to about 850 volts; sensitivity (S) sensitivity from about 250 to about 450 volts/ergs/cm2; residual potential (Vr) less than about 150 volts; dark development potential (Vddp) of between about 280 and about 620 volts; and dark decay voltage (Vdd) of between about 70 and about 20 volts.
For typical prior art ionographic imaging members used in an electrographic system, an electrically insulating dielectric imaging layer is applied to the electrically conductive surface. The substrate also contains an anticurl back coating on the side opposite from the side bearing the electrically active layer to maintain imaging member flatness. In the present disclosure embodiments, ionographic imaging members may however be prepared without the need of an anticurl back coating, through plasticizing the dielectric imaging layer with the use of styrene dimer liquid 22 or 24 incorporation according to the same manners and descriptions demonstrated in the curl-free electrophotographic imaging members preparation above.
To further improved the disclosed imaging member design's mechanical performance, the plasticized top imaging layer, may also include the additive of inorganic or organic fillers to impart greater wear resistant enhancement. Inorganic fillers may include, but are not limited to, silica, metal oxides, metal carbonate, metal silicates, and the like. Examples of organic fillers include, but are not limited to, KEVLAR, stearates, fluorocarbon (PTFE) polymers such as POLYMIST and ZONYL, waxy polyethylene such as ACUMIST and ACRAWAX, fatty amides such as PETRAC erucamide, oleamide, and stearamide, and the like. Either micron-sized or nano-sized inorganic or organic particles can be used in the fillers to achieve mechanical property reinforcement.
The flexible multilayered electrophotographic imaging member fabricated in accordance with the embodiments of present disclosure, described in all the above preceding, may be cut into rectangular sheets. A pair of opposite ends of each imaging member cut sheet is then brought overlapped together thereof and joined by any suitable means, such as ultrasonic welding, gluing, taping, stapling, or pressure and heat fusing to form a continuous imaging member seamed belt, sleeve, or cylinder.
A prepared flexible imaging belt thus may thereafter be employed in any suitable and conventional electrophotographic imaging process which utilizes uniform charging prior to imagewise exposure to activating electromagnetic radiation. When the imaging surface of an electrophotographic member is uniformly charged with an electrostatic charge and imagewise exposed to activating electromagnetic radiation, conventional positive or reversal development techniques may be employed to form a marking material image on the imaging surface of the electrophotographic imaging member. Thus, by applying a suitable electrical bias and selecting toner having the appropriate polarity of electrical charge, a toner image is formed in the charged areas or discharged areas on the imaging surface of the electrophotographic imaging member. For example, for positive development, charged toner particles are attracted to the oppositely charged electrostatic areas of the imaging surface and for reversal development, charged toner particles are attracted to the discharged areas of the imaging surface.
Furthermore, a prepared electrophotographic imaging member belt can additionally be evaluated by printing in a marking engine into which the belt, formed according to the exemplary embodiments, has been installed. For intrinsic electrical properties it can also be determined by conventional electrical drum scanners. Additionally, the assessment of its propensity of developing streak line defects print out in copies can alternatively be carried out by using electrical analyzing techniques, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,703,487; 5,697,024; 6,008,653; 6,119,536; and 6,150,824, which are incorporated herein in their entireties by reference. All the patents and applications referred to herein are hereby specifically, and totally incorporated herein by reference in their entirety in the instant specification.
All the exemplary embodiments encompassed herein include a method of imaging which includes generating an electrostatic latent image on an imaging member, developing a latent image, and transferring the developed electrostatic image to a suitable substrate.
While the description above refers to particular embodiments, it will be understood that many modifications may be made without departing from the spirit thereof. The accompanying claims are intended to cover such modifications as would fall within the true scope and spirit of embodiments herein.
The development of the presently disclosed embodiments will further be demonstrated in the non-limited Working Examples below. They are, therefore in all respects, to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive nor limited to the materials, conditions, process parameters, and the like recited herein. The scope of embodiments are being indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning of and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced therein. All proportions are by weight unless otherwise indicated. It will be apparent, however, that the invention can be practiced with many types of compositions and can have many different uses in accordance with the disclosure above and as pointed out hereinafter.
A conventional prior art flexible electrophotographic imaging member web, as shown in
An adhesive interface layer was then extrusion coated by applying to the blocking layer a wet coating containing 5 percent by weight based on the total weight of the solution of polyester adhesive (MOR-ESTER 49,000, available from Morton International, Inc.) in a 70:30 (v/v) mixture of tetrahydrofuran/cyclohexanone. The resulting adhesive interface layer, after passing through an oven, had a dry thickness of 0.095 micrometers.
The adhesive interface layer was thereafter coated over with a charge generating layer. The charge generating layer dispersion was prepared by adding 1.5 gram of polystyrene-co-4-vinyl pyridine and 44.33 gm of toluene into a 4 ounce glass bottle. 1.5 grams of hydroxygallium phthalocyanine Type V and 300 grams of ⅛-inch (3.2 millimeters) diameter stainless steel shot were added to the solution. This mixture was then placed on a ball mill for about 8 to about 20 hours. The resulting slurry was thereafter coated onto the adhesive interface by extrusion application process to form a layer having a wet thickness of 0.25 mils. However, a strip of about 10 millimeters wide along one edge of the substrate web stock bearing the blocking layer and the adhesive layer was deliberately left uncoated by the charge generating layer to facilitate adequate electrical contact by a ground strip layer to be applied later. The wet charge generating layer was dried at 125° C. for 2 minutes in a forced air oven to form a dry charge generating layer having a thickness of 0.4 micrometers.
This coated web stock was simultaneously coated over with a charge transport layer and a ground strip layer by co-extrusion of the two coating solutions. The charge transport layer was prepared by combining MAKROLON 5705, a Bisphenol A polycarbonate thermoplastic having a molecular weight of about 120,000, commercially available from Farbensabricken Bayer A. G., with a charge transport compound N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diamine in an amber glass bottle in a weight ratio of 30:70 to give 30 weight percent of charge transport compound in the resulting dried charge transport layer. The resulting mixture was dissolved to give 15 percent by weight solid in methylene chloride and was applied onto the charge generating layer along with a ground strip layer during the co-extrusion coating process.
The strip, about 10 millimeters wide, of the adhesive layer left uncoated by the charge generating layer, was coated with a ground strip layer during the co-extrusion of charge transport layer and ground strip coating. The ground strip layer coating mixture was prepared by combining 23.81 grams of polycarbonate resin (MAKROLON 5705, 7.87 percent by total weight solids, available from Bayer A. G.), and 332 grams of methylene chloride in a carboy container. The container was covered tightly and placed on a roll mill for about 24 hours until the polycarbonate was dissolved in the methylene chloride. The resulting solution was mixed for 15-30 minutes with about 93.89 grams of graphite dispersion (12.3 percent by weight solids) of 9.41 parts by weight of graphite, 2.87 parts by weight of ethyl cellulose and 87.7 parts by weight of solvent (Acheson Graphite dispersion RW22790, available from Acheson Colloids Company) with the aid of a high shear blade dispersed in a water cooled, jacketed container to prevent the dispersion from overheating and losing solvent. The resulting dispersion was then filtered and the viscosity was adjusted with the aid of methylene chloride. This ground strip layer coating mixture was then applied, by co-extrusion coating along with the charge transport layer, to the electrophotographic imaging member web to form an electrically conductive ground strip layer.
The imaging member web stock containing all of the above layers was then transported at 60 feet per minute web speed and passed through 125° C. production coater forced air oven to dry the co-extrusion coated ground strip and charge transport layer simultaneously to give respective 19 micrometers and 29 micrometers in dried thicknesses. At this point, the imaging member, having all the dried coating layers, would spontaneously curl upwardly into a 1.5-inch roll when unrestrained after the web was cooled down to room ambient of 25° C., because the charge transport layer had a greater dimensional contraction than that of the PEN substrate. Therefore, according to equation (1), an internal tension strain was built-up inside the charge transport layer to pull the substrate inwardly causing the imaging member to exhibit upward curling.
An anti-curl coating was prepared by combining 88.2 grams of polycarbonate resin (MAKROLON 5705), 7.12 grams VITEL PE-2200 copolyester (available from Bostik, Inc. Middleton, Mass.) and 1,071 grams of methylene chloride in a carboy container to form a coating solution containing 8.9 percent solids. The container was covered tightly and placed on a roll mill for about 24 hours until the polycarbonate and polyester were dissolved in the methylene chloride to form the anti-curl back coating solution. The anti-curl back coating solution was then applied to the rear surface (side opposite the charge generating layer and charge transport layer) of the electrophotographic imaging member web by extrusion coating and dried to a maximum temperature of 125° C. in the forced air oven to produce a dried anti-curl backing layer having a thickness of 17 micrometers and flatten the imaging member. The resulting imaging member, having a 29 micrometer-thick single charge transport layer, was identified CTL 30 and to be used to serve as a Control,
A second conventional prior art flexible electrophotographic imaging member web was prepared in accordance to the material composition and following the very exact same procedures as those described in the Control Example I, but with exception that the 29 micrometer thick single charge transport layer was prepared to have a weight ratio of 40:60 of N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diamine to Makrolon binder which gave 40 weight percent of charge transport compound in the resulting dried charge transport layer. The imaging member thus prepared was identified as Control CTL 40.
A third conventional prior art flexible electrophotographic imaging member web was prepared in accordance to the material composition and following the very exact same procedures as those described in the Control Example I, but with exception that the 29 micrometer thick single charge transport layer was prepared to have a weight ratio of 50:60 of N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diamine to Makrolon binder which gave 50 weight percent of charge transport compound in the resulting dried charge transport layer. The resulting imaging member was identified as Control CTL 50.
Three flexible electrophotographic imaging member webs of the present disclosure, as shown in
Three flexible electrophotographic imaging member webs of the present disclosure, as that of
Three flexible electrophotographic imaging member webs of the present disclosure, like that of
Curl Assessment and Tg Determination
The imaging member of Control Examples I to III and all the plasticized imaging member of Disclosure Examples I, II, and III were each characterized/assessed for the degree of imaging member curling, by measuring the diameter of curvature that each was exhibiting under a freely and unstrained condition. The results of diameter of curvature measurement obtained, listed in Table 1 below, show that incorporation of liquid MSD into the Charge transport layer (CTL) could relax/reduce the CTL internal stress/strain to provide monotonous relief/reduction of upward imaging member curling by the effect of reducing the dimensional contraction mismatch between the CTL and the PEN substrate. And, at 15 weight percent MSD incorporation level, the prepared imaging members of the Disclosure Examples gave the least degree of upward curling. The slight curling-up observed in the imaging members, containing 15 weight percent MSD, would disappear to give acceptable P/R belt edge flatness as soon the imaging member belt was subjected a 1 lb/inch applied belt tension after being mounted over and encircled around the belt support module in the machine.
Although incorporation of liquid MSD was seen to provide effectual relaxation for relieving the internal stress/strain in the CTL and rendering imaging member curl reduction, but plasticization could also depress the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the resulting CTL. Although at the 15 weight percent MSD liquid addition level, the Tg of the plasticized CTL was dropped to about 50° C.; nevertheless, it is still way above a normal machine operation temperature of about 40° C. in the field. Therefore, this plasticized CTL Tg depression should not become an issue to cause the imaging member belt performance under a normal machine belt functioning condition in the field.
Photoelectrical Property Evaluation
All the prepared imaging members of the present disclosure, comprising each respective plasticizing CTL, were analyzed for photo-electrical properties such as for the charge acceptance (V0), sensitivity (S), residual potential (Vr), and dark decay potential (Vdd) to assess proper function. The results obtained using the 5000 scanner test, shown in Table 2 below, had assured that incorporation of the liquid plasticizer MSD at all levels into the CTL containing 30, 40, and 50% charge transport compound variances in all the prepared ACBC-Free imaging members of preceding Disclosure Examples I to III did not substantially impact the crucial photoelectrical properties, as compared to each respective control imaging member counterpart, to therefore assure each imaging member belt machine functional integrity in the field.
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3121006 | Middleton et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
| 3820989 | Rule et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3837851 | Shattuck et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3895944 | Wiedemann et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 4033714 | Longworth | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4150987 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4245021 | Kazami et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4256821 | Enomoto et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4265990 | Stolka et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4278746 | Goto et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4286033 | Neyhart et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4291110 | Lee | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4297426 | Sakai et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4315982 | Ishikawa et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4338387 | Hewitt | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4338388 | Sakai et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4385106 | Sakai | May 1983 | A |
| 4387147 | Sakai | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4399207 | Sakai et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4399208 | Takasu et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4587189 | Hor et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4664995 | Horgan et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4988597 | Spiewak et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5215839 | Yu | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5244762 | Spiewak et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5660961 | Yu | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5697024 | Mishra | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5703487 | Mishra | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5756245 | Esteghamatian et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5958638 | Katayama et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6008653 | Popovic et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6119536 | Popovic et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124514 | Emmrich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6150824 | Mishra et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6183921 | Yu et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6214514 | Evans et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6660441 | Yu | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6756169 | Lin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6933089 | Horgan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7018756 | Pai et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7413835 | Lin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 20060099525 | Yu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100279217 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
