The present invention relates generally to fastener driving tools, and particularly to such tools being powered electrically, by compressed gas, combustion or powder.
Combustion-powered tools are known in the art, are also referred to as combustion nailers, and one type of such tools, also known as IMPULSE® brand tools for use in driving fasteners into workpieces, is described in commonly assigned patents to Nikolich U.S. Pat. Re. No. 32,452, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,522,162; 4,483,473; 4,483,474; 4,403,722; 5,197,646; 5,263,439 and 6,145,724, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. Similar combustion-powered nail and staple driving tools are available commercially from ITW-Paslode of Vernon Hills, Ill. under the IMPULSE® and PASLODE® brands.
Combustion nailers incorporate a tool housing enclosing a small internal combustion engine. The engine is powered by a canister of pressurized fuel gas, also called a fuel cell. A battery-powered electronic power distribution unit produces a spark for ignition, and a fan located in a combustion chamber provides for both an efficient combustion within the chamber, while facilitating processes ancillary to the combustion operation of the device. Such ancillary processes include: inserting the fuel into the combustion chamber; mixing the fuel and air within the chamber; and removing, or scavenging, combustion by-products. The engine includes a reciprocating piston with an elongated, rigid driver blade disposed within a single cylinder body.
Upon the pulling of a trigger switch, which causes the spark to ignite a charge of gas in the combustion chamber of the engine, the combined piston and driver blade is forced downward to impact a positioned fastener and drive it into the workpiece. The piston then returns to its original, or pre-firing position, through differential gas pressures within the cylinder. Fasteners are fed magazine-style into the nosepiece, where they are held in a properly positioned orientation for receiving the impact of the driver blade.
Other fastener driving tools operate similarly in that a reciprocating driver blade drives fasteners fed to a nosepiece by a biased magazine. The power source varies, with pneumatic, electric and powder operated tools being well known in the art.
Combustion nailers and other types of powered fastener driving tools are used in construction framing, where building panels such as plywood, wallboard, roof sheathing or other construction panels are secured to framing studs with fasteners, typically nails. A common problem for installers is making sure that the fastener is driven into a stud to effectively secure the panel in place. Fasteners not engaging the stud represent a wasted effort, as well as wasted materials, and wasted fuel in the case of the combustion tool.
Many installers employ separate stud finders to facilitate location of the studs, which entails additional effort and inconvenience in carrying and maintaining an extra battery-powered device. Also, the installer cannot always easily see the stud finder's readout while working, and the use of these devices slows production, so professional installers do not typically use separate stud finders. Alternatively, other installers measure the spacing of the studs from a corner or panel edge, often using a chalk line, since studs are conventionally built on 16 inch centers or some other standard depending on the geographic location. However, the latter method is not foolproof, and studs are still missed by driven fasteners.
Also, conventional fastener driving tools are available with built in stud finders. Such devices locate the stud, but do not indicate whether the fastener was properly driven into both the panel and the supporting stud, or improperly, only into the panel. As such, the available techniques for accurately driving fasteners are not consistently accurate, and the problem of misdirected fasteners persists in the context of framing construction.
The above-listed needs are met or exceeded by the present stud miss indicator for a fastener tool, which preferably features an accelerometer electronically connected to the tool to measure the difference in signals generated respectively when a tool drives a fastener into solid substrate, such as decking fastened to a stud, resulting in a proper fastener application, and also when the fastener is driven into a substrate backed by air. The latter condition occurs when the fastener does not engage the stud, or engages the stud incompletely, resulting in an improper fastener application. A program in the tool analyzes the accelerometer signal and provides a perceptible warning (audible, tactile and/or visual) which indicates to the user whether or not the fastener has been driven into the stud.
More specifically, a stud miss indicator system for a fastener driving tool includes at least one sensor generating at least one signal based on forces generated by a fastener driving operation, a software program configured for receiving the at least one signal, for evaluating the at least one signal as to a fastener being either improperly driven or properly driven, and the program generating at least one appropriate output signal reflective of the evaluation.
In another embodiment, a fastener tool is provided, including at least one sensor configured for sensing the amount of force generated during a fastener driving operation, a processor connected to the at least one sensor and having a software program constructed for evaluating signals generated by the at least one sensor and determining whether the fastener driving operation was favorable or unfavorable, and for generating an appropriate output signal.
Referring now to
Referring now to
As seen in
Once the program 32 determines the type of signal (high or low “g” forces), an output or alarm signal is generated from an output 36 of the microprocessor 34 and is connected to an indicating device, preferably, at least one of an audible alarm 38, a vibrating device 40, a visual indicator 42 such as an illuminated light or an LED, or a visual display 44 on a screen 46 located on the tool 12.
It is contemplated that the software program 32 is configured such that the output is generated both when the impact sensor signal data is favorable or low (fastener properly driven) as well as unfavorable or high (fastener improperly driven), and different types of alarm or indicator signals are triggered depending on the nature of the output signal. For example, a first color such as a green visual indicator 42 is illuminated when the signal data is favorable, and a second, distinct color such as a red indicator is illuminated when the signal data is unfavorable. Naturally, the particular colors may vary to suit the situation. Different audible alarms 38, vibrating alarm pulses 40, and visual display messages 44 are also contemplated depending on whether the signal is indicative of a favorable or an unfavorable fastener driving operation. Alternatively, the program 32 is configured such that the output 36 is generated to trigger an indication such as an alarm (visual, audible and/or tactile) only when the impact signal is interpreted to be unfavorable (fastener is improperly driven).
Thus, by using the present stud miss indicator system 10, an operator of a fastener driving tool can more efficiently determine whether or not a fastener was properly driven into the immediate workpiece, such as a plywood board or structural panel and into an underlying stud. If the system indicates that a stud was missed, the user can rapidly correct the error by correctly driving a supplemental fastener.
While a particular embodiment of the stud miss indicator for fastener driving tool has been described herein, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and as set forth in the following claims.
The present application claims priority pursuant to 35 USC 119(e) from U.S. Ser. No. 61/488,990 filed May 23, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4023044 | Miller | May 1977 | A |
4207567 | Juengel | Jun 1980 | A |
4339749 | Yamada | Jul 1982 | A |
4403722 | Nikolich | Sep 1983 | A |
4483473 | Wagdy | Nov 1984 | A |
4483474 | Nikolich | Nov 1984 | A |
4487353 | Benson et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4492329 | Benson | Jan 1985 | A |
4514724 | Valentine | Apr 1985 | A |
4514797 | Begin | Apr 1985 | A |
4522162 | Nikolich | Jun 1985 | A |
4610381 | Kramer | Sep 1986 | A |
RE32452 | Nikolich | Jul 1987 | E |
4811883 | Thurner et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4918616 | Yoshimura | Apr 1990 | A |
4942387 | Thomas | Jul 1990 | A |
4980844 | Demjanenko | Dec 1990 | A |
4992741 | Douglas et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5197646 | Nikolich | Mar 1993 | A |
5231352 | Huber | Jul 1993 | A |
5233293 | Huang et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251151 | Demjanenko | Oct 1993 | A |
5263439 | Doherty et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5298889 | Diei | Mar 1994 | A |
5319357 | Diei | Jun 1994 | A |
5480088 | Braun et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5517183 | Bozeman, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5594414 | Namngani | Jan 1997 | A |
5732870 | Moorman | Mar 1998 | A |
5914882 | Yeghiazarians | Jun 1999 | A |
6145724 | Shkolnikov et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6209400 | Schoch | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6297742 | Canada et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6520397 | Moeller | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6607041 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6619527 | Moeller | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6796476 | Birk | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6808101 | Laubach | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6834559 | Beebe | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6851487 | Shotey | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7182148 | Szieff | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7193405 | Murray | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202658 | Ketelaars et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7231303 | Griessler et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
D605919 | Schneider et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
7734859 | Daniel | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7834618 | Moura et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7934566 | Hlinka et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8049637 | Tompkins | Nov 2011 | B2 |
9381635 | Moore et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010007420 | Bijawat et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020123386 | Perlmutter | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030024311 | Perkins | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050001000 | Favre-Bulle et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050072239 | Longsdorf et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050230130 | Strasser | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060065690 | Fujisawa | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070008162 | Gossett et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070221697 | Gschwend | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080078799 | Wen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080110653 | Zhang | May 2008 | A1 |
20080236585 | Parker | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252446 | Dammertz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288200 | Noble | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319570 | Van Schoiack | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000801 | Calvet et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090248326 | Greening | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100038394 | Hlinka et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058901 | Calloway et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100243699 | Largo | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110105955 | Yudovsky | May 2011 | A1 |
20110162858 | Coste | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185864 | Ide | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110186319 | Pellenc | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120083705 | Yuen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120146463 | Ng | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120298390 | Schieler et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130127262 | Roser | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133912 | Mizuno | May 2013 | A1 |
20140288874 | Matsunaga | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued by the EPO, dated Sep. 19, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120298390 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61488990 | May 2011 | US |