Not applicable.
The present invention is directed to an integral delivery valve/regulator for pressurized gas storage containers. In particular, the present invention is directed to an integral delivery valve/regulator for pressurized gas storage containers that requires sub-atmospheric pressure to enable the withdrawal of the gas from the container.
Toxic and other hazardous specialty gases are used in a number of industrial applications, including semiconductor device fabrication. Many users of these hazardous specialty gases are concerned about the possibility of an unintentional release. By virtue of having a positive gauge pressure, pressurized gases in cylinders will be released immediately once a shut-off valve attached to the pressurized cylinder is opened. Even with a gas-tight outlet cap in place (as required for most hazardous gases), unintentional opening of the valve can lead to serious consequences when the cap is removed. Although always undesirable, a hazardous gas release may be particularly undesirable in semiconductor processing applications. Such a release would necessitate a partial or complete evacuation of the semiconductor processing factory, leading to substantial losses in scrap product and unscheduled downtime. Also, the sensitive and expensive equipment used in semiconductor processing factories may be damaged by exposure to even traces of the hazardous gas.
Many hazardous gas containers are outfitted with restrictive flow orifices in the valve outlet to limit the rate of release of the gas in the event of an accidental release. Although a restrictive flow orifice may significantly reduce the hazardous gas release rate, any release can still cause a considerable disruption to operations, and the hazard risk to personnel will not be totally eliminated. Furthermore, flow restriction may be unacceptable due to impracticably limiting the flow of the gas while the cylinder is in service. Excess flow sensors coupled to automatic shut-off valves can shut off flow in the event of a leak in a delivery system, but will only be effective when the release is substantially larger than the delivery flow-rate and if it occurs downstream of the automatic shutoff valve. It may also be possible to trigger a shut-off valve based on a hazardous gas monitor near the possible leakage points. All such systems, however, are complex and costly, and are only effective for gas containers that are already properly installed in a gas delivery system. Many semiconductor manufacturing processes, such as ion-implantation, chemical vapor deposition, reactive ion etching, high-density plasma etching, and the like, use hazardous gases at sub-atmospheric pressure (i.e. below ambient pressure). As a result, the gas cylinder need not provide the gas with a positive gauge pressure in all cases.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term gas, as indicated herein, encompasses both a permanent gas and a vapor of a liquified gas. Permanent gases are gases which, practically, cannot be liquified by pressure alone. Vapors of liquified gases are present above the liquid in a compressed gas cylinder. Gases which liquify under pressure as they are compressed for filling into a cylinder are not permanent gases and are more accurately described as liquified gases under pressure or as vapors of liquified gases.
One approach to providing sub-atmospheric gas delivery is a method described by Knollmueller in U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,221 and by Tom, et al. in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,518,528, 5,704,965 and 5,704,967 wherein a hazardous gas is physically or chemically adsorbed on the surface of a sorbent within a container to lower the equilibrium pressure of the desired species in the container. While this method has been employed for the storage and delivery of certain gases (see, e.g., McManus, J. V. et al., Semiconductor Fabtech, Volume 7, 1998), the method has significant limitations. First, the amount of gas stored in a given volume of the adsorbent used is relatively small compared to a liquefied compressed gas (e.g. phosphine) thereby requiring a relatively large vessel which utilizes valuable footprint space, which is important, for example, when these gases are used in a semiconductor fabrication cleanroom. Also, heat transfer limitations in the solid sorbent will limit the rate at which gas can be desorbed compared to that from a compressed gas (e.g. silicon tetrafluoride).
Knollmueller (U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,221) describes a process of adsorbing a gas onto a solid sorbent so that the equilibrium pressure of the gas is reduced inside of a vessel. By heating the vessel, the equilibrium pressure in the vessel could be increased and permit the delivery of the gas at above-atmospheric pressure. However, heating of specialty gases is undesirable because it may be slow, hard to control and cause decomposition of the gas. Also, when heated so that the delivery pressure is increased, there is decreased protection against accidental release of the gas.
Tom, et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,518,528 and subsequently U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,704,965 and 5,704,967) improved on this concept by using a sorbent where the gas could be released without substantial decomposition by reducing the downstream pressure. These sorbents still have a disadvantage of needing to be optimized for each sorbate (hazardous gas). Further, the equilibrium pressure in the vessel in this system is constantly being decreased as product is withdrawn. This phenomenon makes gas flow control more difficult and limits the fraction of the gas charged into the vessel that may be withdrawn by the user. Also, in the event that the ambient temperature increases, the pressure inside the vessel could potentially increase above atmospheric pressure, decreasing the protection against accidental release. Conversely, at cooler temperatures, there may not be sufficient pressure to deliver the gas.
An additional concern when storing hazardous gases under sub-ambient pressures is the likelihood of inboard contamination of the vessel in the event of a leak due to the vacuum. Not only will this atmospheric contamination adversely affect the purity the gas, but, with respect to the above method, it could also conceivably react with the adsorbed gas stored under sub-ambient pressure and generate heat, pressure or corrosive by-products. An additional problem with this method is that the pressure of the gas being delivered is a function of both the quantity of adsorbed gas remaining and the temperature of the adsorbent. Hence, the pressure in the vessel containing the adsorbed gas could easily exceed atmospheric pressure if the contents are heated. Also, the delivery pressure undesirably decreases as the contents of the vessel are depleted. Eventually, the delivery pressure diminishes to a point where sufficient flow can no longer be sustained. At this point, the source must be replaced, even though there may be substantial inventory of gas remaining in the adsorbed phase relative to the initial charge.
Another approach to providing sub-atmospheric gas delivery is a device described by Le Febre et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,937,895. Here, the device provides a regulator that uses a valve element that is responsive, in one embodiment, to a vacuum condition downstream of the regulator. The valve only allows flow when this vacuum condition occurs downstream of the valve such that the possibility of accidental spillage or release of toxic liquid or gases is reduced. Note that no sorbents are used as described in the Knollmueller and Tom patents. This patent also teaches use of its sub-atmospheric gas delivery device with an internal flow restriction within the storage container as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,045,115. This flow restrictor provides a capillary size opening that limits the discharge of gas phase fluid from the pressurized container. As indicated in the '115 patent, liquid discharge from the container may be particularly hazardous since the mass rate of discharge of liquid will greatly exceed the mass rate of discharge of the corresponding gas through a particular opening. The '115 patent locates the entry point of the capillary flow restrictor at approximately the midpoint of the length of the cylinder. This therefore prevents discharge of a liquid in the cylinder whether the cylinder is upside down or right side up. However, a negative aspect of this design is that the capillary system may be prone to clogging. Once plugged, the cylinder would be difficult or impossible to empty of the hazardous gas.
To accomplish the same result of preventing discharge of a liquid, PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US99/09137, teaches use of a pressurized container which uses a phase separation device, which is a porous membrane that is permeable to vapor or gas deriving from liquid in the container, but is not permeable to the liquid. Here, the phase separator is disposed upstream of the pressure regulator so that fluid is prevented from entering and interfering with the function of the regulator and preventing egress of liquid from the vessel. The regulator is a flow device which can be set at a predetermined level to dispense gas or vapor from the container at a vessel pressure level which may be superatmospheric, sub-atmospheric, or atmospheric pressure, depending on dispensing conditions.
The present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art by reducing the pressure to sub-atmospheric mechanically, rather than by sorption and by use of a high pressure valve upstream of the regulator. While negative pressure regulators (also known as absolute pressure regulators or vacuum regulators) are well-known, by placing this functionality integral to a gas storage and delivery package, use of one provides the unique benefits not afforded by a stand-alone regulator. This integral valve/regulator, which may be pre-set and locked to provide only sub-ambient pressures, beneficially reduces the risk of accidental release of gases.
European Patent Application EP 0 916 891 A2 discloses a modular gas control valve having a high pressure shut off valve upstream of a regulator. Here, the purpose of the shut-off valve is for dispensing control. The system taught here is for a standard compressed gas system, not for a system that only provides the gas when the pressure downstream of the regulator is sub-atmospheric. The use in preventing liquid interfering with the regulator is not taught.
None of the prior art teaches an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases at sub-atmospheric pressure from a pressurized container which includes a sub-atmospheric pressure regulator to allow the gas in the container to be delivered only when the pressure sensing means senses a downstream pressure at or below a pre-set pressure, and which includes a high pressure shut-off valve upstream of the pressure regulator. The gas may flow only when said outlet orifice of the apparatus is connected to a vacuum system. The high pressure valve upstream of the regulator in the integral valve/regulator provides numerous advantages as will be discussed in detail below.
It is principally desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases from a pressurized container.
It is further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases at sub-atmospheric pressure from a pressurized container.
It is still further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases that reduces the possibility of accidental spills or release of the hazardous gas.
It is also further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases without the need for sorbents to control the handling, storage, and delivery of toxic fluids.
It is further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases that may only discharge its contents when placed in service with a vacuum system.
It is still further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases that can only dispense a hazardous gas when conditions downstream of the apparatus are at a desired pressure less than atmospheric pressure.
It is also further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases that does not require use of a restrictive flow orifice.
It is further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases that does not require use of excess flow sensors coupled to automatic shut-off valves to shut off unintentional flow of the hazardous gas.
It is still further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases without the need for a shut-off valve coupled to a hazardous gas monitor near possible leakage points.
It is also further desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases at sub-atmospheric pressure where the likelihood of inboard contamination of the vessel in the event of a leak due to the vacuum is minimized.
Finally, it is desired to provide an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases which requires a relatively small amount of space.
The present invention provides a delivery valve/regulator apparatus for pressurized gas storage containers that requires sub-atmospheric pressure downstream of the valve to enable the withdrawal of the gas from the container. Included in the delivery valve/regulator apparatus is a high pressure shut-off valve upstream of a pressure reducing device or regulator. This high pressure shut-off valve acts to prevent liquid from getting into the regulator which would cause an unacceptably high discharge rate. Since a primary objective of the present invention is to provide fail-safe delivery, this high pressure shut-off valve serves as a back-up to the pressure reducing device in preventing unintentional gas release during transportation, connection and disconnection from the users' apparatus. Optionally, the high-pressure shut-off valve is pneumatically or otherwise mechanically actuated and is biased to be normally closed when not pneumatically or otherwise energized.
An apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases at sub-atmospheric pressure from a pressurized container is provided which includes a valve body in sealed communication with an outlet orifice of the pressurized container. The outlet orifice of the pressurized container is open to an interior chamber of the pressurized container. A fluid discharge path is located in the valve body, between the outlet orifice of the pressurized container and an outlet orifice of the valve body. A pressure regulator having a pressure sensing means capable of responding to sub-atmospheric pressure, integral to the valve body, in-line in the fluid discharge path with the pressure regulator pre-set to a pressure below atmospheric pressure to allow the gas to be delivered through the regulator from the interior chamber only when the pressure regulator senses a downstream pressure at or below the pre-set pressure. Finally, a high pressure shut-off valve integral to the valve body and in-line in the fluid discharge path and upstream from the pressure regulator is included. The gas flows through from the interior chamber of the pressurized container through the fluid discharge path, through the outlet orifice of the pressurized container, and through the outlet orifice of the valve body only when the outlet orifice is connected to a vacuum system.
Optionally, the pressure regulator is preset and locked at the pressure below atmospheric. Also, optionally included is a low pressure shut-off valve in-line in the fluid discharge path, downstream of the pressure regulator, to control flow of gas from the gas cylinder and to protect the regulator from ingress of ambient air during storage and transit when the low pressure shut-off valve is in a closed position. The high pressure shut-off valve may be biased to be normally closed when no energized vacuum system is connected to the outlet orifice of the valve body. A filling path in the valve body between the outlet orifice of the pressurized container and a filling port orifice of the valve body may be included. Optionally, a residual pressure valve, in-line in the fluid discharge path, upstream of the high-pressure shut-off valve and downstream of the outlet orifice of the container, to prevent back flow of air or foreign gases may be included. The pressure regulator may be fixed at a pre-set pressure or may be variable. A valve protection cap removably disposed on the pressurized container may serve as a secondary containment means for vapors leaking from the container and the apparatus. The valve protection cap may have a port to attach to a leak detection device. Finally, the vacuum system may include a compressor that withdraws gas from the vessel at sub-atmospheric pressure and then compresses the gas to deliver the gas at a higher pressure.
The present invention provides a delivery valve/regulator apparatus for pressurized gas storage containers that requires sub-atmospheric pressure downstream of the valve to enable the withdrawal of gas from the container. Included in the delivery valve/regulator apparatus is a high pressure shut-off valve upstream of a pressure reducing device or regulator. This high pressure shut-off valve acts to prevent liquid from getting into the regulator from the container which would cause an unacceptably high discharge rate. Since a primary objective of the present invention is to provide fail-safe delivery, this high pressure shut-off valve serves as a back-up to the pressure reducing device in preventing unintentional gas release during transportation, connection and disconnection from the users' apparatus. Optionally, the high-pressure shut-off valve is pneumatically or otherwise mechanically actuated and is biased to be normally closed when not pneumatically or otherwise energized.
Further, when delivering a highly hazardous gas in a sub-ambient condition, it may be particularly advantageous to evacuate the upstream side of the pressure regulator to remove potential impurities before using the gas. Again, it is advantageous to again evacuate the system after using the gas container to evacuate the space just upstream of the regulator of toxic gases. These evacuations are only possible when there is a positive shut-off valve upstream of the regulator.
As indicated above, a safe means of delivering hazardous gases would be afforded by using an absolute pressure regulator, i.e. a regulator which has its pressure sensing means capable of responding to sub-atmospheric pressure instead of atmospheric pressure, that is integral to the gas cylinder package. Such a regulator could be pre-set and locked at a convenient pressure below 0 psig (e.g., about −5 psig) which would ensure that no gas would be delivered if the containers outlet valve or other delivery system components were inadvertently opened to the atmosphere. The gas would flow, however, only when the system is properly connected to a vacuum system. An added benefit of this design is that the regulator also acts help to prevent back-flow into the cylinder, even when the pressure in the container were below atmospheric. The delivery pressure would be chosen to provide sufficient driving force for flow so that the molar flow rate of the gas could be accurately controlled.
The delivery pressure setting of the regulator may be adjusted by use of a fixed spring, or could use an adjustable spring requiring a special key to adjust or could use a partially evacuated or pressurized dome load. Alternatively, the pressure regulating device could consist of a micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) comprised of a pressure sensor and a micromachined control valve both etched, for example, in a single silicon wafer that is part of the gas flow path. In any embodiment of this invention, however, a critical feature of the delivery system is that the maximum delivery pressure is always below that of normal atmospheric pressure under any conditions that the container may reasonably be expected to be exposed.
When the contents of the cylinder are depleted so that the weight or internal pressure of the cylinder falls below an acceptable level, the cylinder may be changed in the usual manner, replacing it with a full container. The spent container could be refilled by a gas supplier by using a separate channel built into the container, having a specially keyed valve and a gas-tight outlet cap, one or both of which may only be open by the gas supplier by using specially keyed tools.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers refer to like elements throughout the several views, there is shown in
When discussed herein, note that reference to the high pressure valve 18 and the low pressure valve 22 refer to the location of the valve in the flowpath, not necessarily, the physical characteristics of the valves. That is, the high pressure valve 18 is closest to the pressurized gas cylinder 12 and is upstream of the regulator 16, and the low pressure valve 22 is downstream of the high pressure valve 18 and the regulator 16.
In one mode of operation, an inert gas (e.g. dry N2, Ar, etc.) may be introduced into the valve/regulator assembly 14′ before closing the low-pressure valve 22 to further reduce the risk of air ingress into the regulator 16 during transit. Thus, an additional role of the high-pressure shut-off valve 18 is to positively separate and thereby prevent the contamination or dilution of the hazardous process gas with the inert purge gas used to blanket the regulator in transit. Optionally, the high pressure shut-off valve 18 may be biased to be normally closed when no energized vacuum system is connected to the outlet orifice of the valve body, by means known in the art.
A refill port 24 may be separate, as shown in the embodiments of
A specific embodiment of an apparatus for containing and delivering hazardous gases (for this example C4F6) at sub-ambient pressure 40 is shown in
If required by transport authorities, an optional pressure relief device 34 may be included as shown in
Additionally, a pressure gauge, upstream of the regulator, can be included for on-liquified compressed gases to indicate content of gas in container.
In this example, the gas user connects to outlet port 38 (see
As can be seen in
Should the system inadvertently be opened to atmosphere, then flow of the hazardous gas will soon stop or be dramatically reduced, thereby reducing the risk of personnel exposure or of equipment damage. Similarly, should the low pressure valve 22 or both the low pressure valve 22 and the high pressure valve 18 be opened inadvertently, without first connecting the outlet port 38 to the vacuum source 44, then little or no gas will escape from the vessel.
As can be seen in
For delivery of low-vapor pressure gases, it may be possible to have the valve/regulator assembly 14 welded onto the pressurized gas cylinder 12 or otherwise integrally attached to ensure complete sealing without valve threads to act as a possible leak source. A possible advantageous arrangement would place the sensitive components of the regulator 16 inside of the pressure vessel 12, thereby protecting them.
Connection between the gas outlet 38 and the user's vacuum system can be through any number of standard high-integrity vacuum connections, such as Swagelok®, VCR® and Ultratorr® connections from Cajon, Conflat® or Del-Seal™, or JIS, ISO, KF, W, B, or C seals from various sources. Also, the appropriate keyed gas cylinder connections recommended by the Compressed Gas Association may be used. As a possible extension, custom keyed connections could be instituted to ensure incompatible gases were not mistakenly connected. See generally
An optional integral valve protection device (akin to a cylinder cap) 54, shown schematically in
The present invention may optionally include a residual pressure valve 58 that can be connected upstream of the high-pressure shut-off valve 18 to prevent back flow of foreign gases, as can be seen in
A pressure reducing device (regulator) of the preferred single stage diaphragm design has the general property that the regulated downstream (outlet) pressure will vary with the inlet pressure so that decreasing inlet pressure leads to increasing outlet pressure. Therefore, since the crux of the present invention is to provide a device that will safely deliver gas or vapor only when the downstream pressure is below a certain value (e.g. below atmospheric pressure) that will not likely occur in transit or in storage, it is essential that the upstream pressure always be maintained above a certain pressure. The presence of the residual pressure valve in this context solves this problem.
Finally, the apparatus may be constructed of modular components such that the variations taught herein may be easily manufactured and easily changed by a user.
Although illustrated and described herein with reference to specific embodiments, the present invention nevertheless is not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9724168 | Nov 1997 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/189,562 filed on Nov. 11, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,314,986 B1, issued on Nov. 13, 2001, which claims priority to GB 9724168, filed on Nov. 14, 1997.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
255338 | Salomon | Mar 1882 | A |
788352 | Crawford | Apr 1905 | A |
1042745 | Zahm | Oct 1912 | A |
1731519 | Bastian | Oct 1929 | A |
1837233 | Rumpff | Dec 1931 | A |
1916635 | Pepper | Jul 1933 | A |
2057150 | Kehl et al. | Oct 1936 | A |
2091051 | Mesinger | Aug 1937 | A |
2105864 | Saunders | Jan 1938 | A |
2237052 | Gill | Apr 1941 | A |
2322468 | Redrup | Jun 1943 | A |
2357777 | White | Sep 1944 | A |
2499527 | Raymond | Mar 1950 | A |
2502588 | Preston et al. | Apr 1950 | A |
2509078 | Stover | May 1950 | A |
2517534 | Courtot | Aug 1950 | A |
2608971 | Holmes | Sep 1952 | A |
2623331 | Greening | Dec 1952 | A |
2645884 | Kellie | Jul 1953 | A |
2654976 | Jörgensen | Oct 1953 | A |
2666297 | Skousgaard | Jan 1954 | A |
2675793 | Ziege | Apr 1954 | A |
2693823 | Sogge | Nov 1954 | A |
2750071 | Ritchie | Jun 1956 | A |
2765983 | Mayo | Oct 1956 | A |
2854991 | Webster | Oct 1958 | A |
2861587 | Hursen | Nov 1958 | A |
2918930 | Jansen | Dec 1959 | A |
2925987 | Priesmeyer | Feb 1960 | A |
3083721 | Matthews et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3095890 | Cousteau et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3137308 | Machlanski et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
3212525 | Henderson | Oct 1965 | A |
3214134 | Noakes | Oct 1965 | A |
3245583 | Miller et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3276470 | Griffing | Oct 1966 | A |
3319649 | Cummins | May 1967 | A |
3561477 | Pinto | Feb 1971 | A |
3566913 | Parthe, Jr. | Mar 1971 | A |
3604445 | Jordan et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3650290 | Moen et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3709242 | Chase | Jan 1973 | A |
3720222 | Andrews et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3746036 | Du Bois et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3756271 | Grogono et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3766933 | Nicholson, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
3776267 | Alley | Dec 1973 | A |
3787023 | Shufflebarger et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3795258 | Iung | Mar 1974 | A |
3797803 | Goto et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3811467 | Jones | May 1974 | A |
3827246 | Moen et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3845876 | Needham et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3885589 | Iung | May 1975 | A |
3939872 | Wentworth, Jr. | Feb 1976 | A |
3955794 | Hankosky | May 1976 | A |
3982559 | Ochs | Sep 1976 | A |
4004608 | Kish | Jan 1977 | A |
4040445 | McCormick | Aug 1977 | A |
4044737 | Nishimura | Aug 1977 | A |
4044739 | Miura et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4061483 | Burg | Dec 1977 | A |
4070001 | Musgrove | Jan 1978 | A |
4108197 | Brakebill | Aug 1978 | A |
4120480 | Ando et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4128391 | Braunstein | Dec 1978 | A |
4166607 | Webb | Sep 1979 | A |
4167198 | Kotyza et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4169486 | Otteman et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4198854 | Washington et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4201366 | Danko et al. | May 1980 | A |
4211387 | Getchell et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4228777 | Haase | Oct 1980 | A |
4232695 | Roberge | Nov 1980 | A |
4237920 | Norman | Dec 1980 | A |
4287909 | Tompson et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4335742 | Jacyno | Jun 1982 | A |
4348005 | Eaton et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4349136 | Fallon et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4376376 | Gregory | Mar 1983 | A |
4383547 | Lorenz et al. | May 1983 | A |
4431117 | Genbauffe et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4434778 | Morita et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4484695 | Fallon et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4487334 | Werding | Dec 1984 | A |
4497339 | Gruner et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4508132 | Mayfield, Jr. et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4520838 | Fisher et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4526341 | Thomas | Jul 1985 | A |
4537385 | Bragg et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4554942 | Williams et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4556193 | Yoshiga | Dec 1985 | A |
4583372 | Egan et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4606195 | Winkler | Aug 1986 | A |
4634099 | Danko et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4640221 | Barbee et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4659061 | Scheffel | Apr 1987 | A |
4687017 | Danko et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4706929 | Kalaskie et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4709575 | Myers | Dec 1987 | A |
4723967 | Tom | Feb 1988 | A |
4738693 | Tom | Apr 1988 | A |
4744221 | Knollmueller | May 1988 | A |
4754897 | Brace | Jul 1988 | A |
4756310 | Bitterly | Jul 1988 | A |
4763690 | Martin | Aug 1988 | A |
4815699 | Mueller | Mar 1989 | A |
4821907 | Castles et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4828219 | Ohmi et al. | May 1989 | A |
4844111 | Pritchard et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4846440 | Carlson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4869301 | Ohmi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4905723 | Pritchard et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4909269 | Pritchard et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917136 | Ohmi et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5033499 | Patel et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5056759 | Schlesch | Oct 1991 | A |
5071453 | Hradek et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5086801 | Peacock et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5086807 | Lasnier et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5117797 | Telep et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5127436 | Campion et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131627 | Kolenc | Jul 1992 | A |
5137047 | George | Aug 1992 | A |
5156827 | Tom et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163475 | Gregoire | Nov 1992 | A |
5165655 | Drexel et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5209253 | Taylor | May 1993 | A |
5217043 | Novakovi | Jun 1993 | A |
5238016 | Eidsmore | Aug 1993 | A |
5238024 | Taylor | Aug 1993 | A |
5241987 | Ohmi et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5255525 | Wieland et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263477 | Crome | Nov 1993 | A |
5271232 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5297578 | Scott et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305791 | Kowalchuk | Apr 1994 | A |
5329966 | Fenimore et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337790 | Heritier-Best et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341968 | Vandoninck | Aug 1994 | A |
5357758 | Andonian | Oct 1994 | A |
5368062 | Okumura et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5390697 | Muschelknautz | Feb 1995 | A |
5392815 | Stuart | Feb 1995 | A |
5398725 | Nakazawa et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409526 | Zheng et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5421366 | Naffziger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438837 | Caldwell et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440477 | Rohrberg et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442927 | Germain | Aug 1995 | A |
5443090 | Ligh | Aug 1995 | A |
5452738 | Borland et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456281 | Teay | Oct 1995 | A |
5518528 | Tom et al. | May 1996 | A |
5544785 | Frigiere | Aug 1996 | A |
5553635 | Gregoire | Sep 1996 | A |
5566713 | Lhomer et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5597009 | Scherrer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601107 | Moore et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605179 | Strong, Jr. et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5634627 | Daido et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651528 | Frei et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657786 | DuRoss et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5673897 | Crochet et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678602 | Cannet et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678803 | Shinohara et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5704965 | Tom et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5704967 | Tom et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707424 | Tom et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5727589 | Yokogi | Mar 1998 | A |
5740833 | Olds et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749227 | Smith et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749389 | Ritrosi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755254 | Carter et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755255 | Iwabuchi | May 1998 | A |
5755364 | LeCoffre et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761910 | Tom | Jun 1998 | A |
5819782 | Itafuji | Oct 1998 | A |
5820102 | Borland | Oct 1998 | A |
5836351 | Underwood, III | Nov 1998 | A |
5845675 | Ligh | Dec 1998 | A |
5890876 | Suito et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895376 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909747 | Schieber | Jun 1999 | A |
5913505 | Ouvrard et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915410 | Zajac | Jun 1999 | A |
5916245 | Tom | Jun 1999 | A |
5935305 | Tom et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937895 | Le Febre et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941506 | Smith et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964446 | Walton et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5996617 | Olds et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6000419 | Bernhard | Dec 1999 | A |
6003535 | Ollivier | Dec 1999 | A |
6007609 | Semerdjian et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012478 | Park | Jan 2000 | A |
6027547 | Tom et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6045115 | Martin, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6089027 | Wang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101816 | Wang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105598 | Cabrera et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6186177 | Maher | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210482 | Kitayama et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216739 | Fukushima et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
250347 | Sep 1986 | CZ |
0 275 242 | Jul 1988 | EP |
0 308 875 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0459 966 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0 512 553 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 588 531 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 470 009 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0 688 983 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 747 796 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0916891 | May 1999 | EP |
0916891 | Aug 1999 | EP |
403 238 | Dec 1933 | GB |
743011 | Jan 1956 | GB |
1215303 | Dec 1970 | GB |
1430213 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2 045 414 | Oct 1980 | GB |
57-207913 | Dec 1982 | JP |
61-266884 | Nov 1986 | JP |
91-219172 | Sep 1991 | JP |
93-039898 | Feb 1993 | JP |
93-215299 | Aug 1993 | JP |
WO 9417334 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 9607843 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9629529 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9909137 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0079159 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0067089 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09189562 | Nov 1998 | US |
Child | 09641933 | US |