The present invention relates generally to sucker rod pump systems as more particularly to cleaning debris from a downhole pump.
Sucker rod pumps occasionally encounter solid particles or “trash” during operation. Oftentimes these solids pass harmlessly through the pump. Other times the debris will cause the pump traveling and/or standing valves to not properly seat (stick open, for example). If the traveling or standing valve do not properly seat, the pump will malfunction, adversely affecting the production rate of fluid.
It would therefore be desirable to have a pumping system that addresses some of the aforementioned problems, and further includes embodiments of construction which is both durable and long lasting. It would also be desirable if this pumping system required little or no maintenance to be provided by the user throughout its operating lifetime. Additionally, it would be desirable if the aforementioned pumping system were of inexpensive construction to thereby afford it the broadest possible market. Finally, it is also an objective that all of the aforesaid advantages and objectives be achieved without incurring any substantial relative disadvantage.
The disadvantages and limitations of the background art discussed above are substantially overcome by the present invention.
There is disclosed a method to dislodge debris from a pump system with the pump system including a downhole pump coupled to a rod string to an above-ground actuator which is coupled to a controller. The controller is configured to operate the pump system, wherein the actuator has an adjustable stroke length.
The method includes determining that the pump system should begin operating in a Pump Clean Mode. Upon start, the Pump Clean Mode is implemented by the controller. The controller cycles the pump actuator at a preset command speed using a preset starting stroke length, preset acceleration rate, and a preset deceleration rate. The controller continues to cycle the pump actuator while incrementally decreasing the stroke length at a preset stroke length increment resulting in increased pump cycling frequencies. The controller determines that the Pump Clean Mode is complete and returns the pump system to a normal operation mode.
The method may also include impressing a preset vibration frequency during a portion of the pump stroke of a pump cycle. In some circumstances the vibration frequency is the pump system rod string resonant frequency.
In another embodiment, the preset command speed of the Pump Clean Mode is a full speed operation for the pump system. In a further embodiment, the controller determines that the pump system should begin operating in the clean mode when it determines that the pump system output has decreased.
The controller can also be configured wherein the step of determining that the Pump Clean Mode is complete comprises determining that the stroke length has become less than or equal to a preset minimum stroke length. The Pump Clean Mode can be implemented in the controller by one of remote telemetry, by a key pad coupled to the controller, or the controller can be configured to automatically operate at a preset time, after a preset stroke count, or automatically upon detection of a malfunction of the pump.
There is also disclosed the method to dislodge debris from a pump system with the pump system including a downhole pump coupled to a rod string and to an above-ground actuator which is coupled to a controller. The controller is configured to operate the pump system.
The method includes determining that the pump system should begin operating in a Pump Clean Mode and implementing the Pump Clean Mode which is configured in the controller. The controller is configured to impress a preset vibration frequency during a portion of the pump stroke for each pump cycle, and when the controller determines that the Pump Clean Mode is complete, the controller returns the pump system to a normal operation mode.
In one embodiment the vibration frequency is the pump system rod string resonant frequency. In a further embodiment, the step of determining that the pump system should begin operating in the Clean Mode includes determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system have been completed in the normal operation mode. In certain embodiments, the step of determining that the pump system should begin operating in the Clean Mode includes determining that the pump system output has decreased.
A further embodiment provides that the step of determining that the Pump Clean Mode is complete includes determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system have been completed in the Pump Clean Mode. In particular embodiments, implementation of the Pump Clean Mode is accomplished by one of remote telemetry, key pad, automatically at preset time and automatically upon detection of a malfunction of the pump.
Such an apparatus should be of construction which is both durable and long lasting, and it should also require little or no maintenance to be provided by the user throughout its operating lifetime. In order to enhance the market appeal of such an apparatus, it should also be of inexpensive construction to thereby afford it the broadest possible market. Finally, the advantages of such an apparatus should be achieved without incurring any substantial relative disadvantage.
These and other advantages of the present disclosure are best understood with reference to the drawings, in which:
Sucker rod pumps typically are used in down-hole wells in petroleum production such as oil and gas. During a typical operation, the pump may lose efficiency because of debris sucked into the pump causing loss of production and maintenance costs.
For purposes of this application a sucker rod pump is defined as a down-hole pumping apparatus 69 that includes a stationary valve 78, and a traveling valve 80. The traveling valve 80 is attached to a rod string 82 extending upward through the tubing 70 and exiting the well head 54 at the polished rod 52. Those having skill in the art will recognize that the down-hole pumping apparatus 68, in the exemplary embodiment of the invention, forms a traditional sucker-rod pump 69 arrangement for lifting fluid from the bottom of the well 56 as the polished rod 52 imparts reciprocal motion to rod string 82 and the rod string 82 in turn causes reciprocal motion of the traveling valve 80 through a pump stroke 84. In a typical hydrocarbon well, the rod string 82 may be several thousand feet long and the pump stroke 84 may be several feet long.
As shown in
The reversible motor, for example an electric motor or a hydraulic motor of a linear rod pump apparatus, includes a reversibly rotatable element thereof, operatively connected to the substantially vertically movable member of the linear mechanical actuator arrangement 102 in a manner establishing a fixed relationship between the rotational position of the motor 104 and the vertical position of a rack. As will be understood, by those having skill in the art, having a fixed relationship between the rotational position of the motor 104 and the vertical position of the polished rod 52 provides a number of significant advantages in the construction and operation of a sucker-rod pump apparatus, according to the invention.
As shown in
Occasionally debris will dislodge or clear as a result of normal operation of the pump, with no intervention required. Other times it is necessary for a crew to use specialized equipment to “flush” the pump, or possibly even pull the pump out of the wellbore for inspection and remediation. Some operators may attempt to “bump down,” where the pump and rod string are dropped from a short distance in an attempt to dislodge the debris through the shock of the pump plunger striking the bottom. These types of interventions are expensive and time consuming. Furthermore, lost production when the pump is malfunctioning can be a major loss of revenue for the producer.
The methods described herein are for an autonomous process for clearing debris from a typical sucker rod pump system with little or no user intervention required, ultimately resulting in increased profit for the petroleum producer through increased production and reduced maintenance costs. Embodiments of the invention include a process, as disclosed herein, in which may be embedded into the sucker rod pumping unit prime mover (a controlled drive system).
In one embodiment, the process is implemented in a Unico LRP® sucker rod pumping unit system. A Pump Clean Mode 300, as illustrated in the flowchart of
In general, the Pump Clean Mode 300 vibrates the pump at strategic predetermined frequencies for a predetermined time, for example approximately two minutes to dislodge debris on the pump valve 78, 80, allowing the debris to pass through the valves 78, 80 and into the pipe string 82 of the wellbore 60. More specifically, in certain embodiments, there are two separate phases to the Pump Clean Mode 300: 1) High speed normal operation with vibration during the upstroke of the pump; and 2) High speed oscillation of the pumping unit by progressively shortening the pumping stroke.
Referring again to
To maximize the energy of the shock load (peaks) transferred to the down-hole pump 68, it is desirable to oscillate the rod string 82 at its natural resonant frequency. This can be accomplished incidentally by sweeping through a frequency spectrum, or by targeting the rod-string resonant frequency, calculated with the following equation:
In this equation, f is the natural frequency and M is the mass of the rod 52, which is found by dividing the weight (W) by gravity M=W/g. K is the stiffness of the rod and depends upon the length of the rod, its Modulus of Elasticity (material property), and the moment of inertia.
One method for sweeping frequencies is to progressively shorten the pump stroke 84 while operating the pumping unit at full speed, causing a corresponding increase in stroking frequency (strokes per minute). At some point during this sweep, the stroking frequency will match the rod-string natural frequency. An added benefit to this technique is establishment of a state whereby both the traveling and standing valves 78, 80 of the sucker rod pump 69 are opened simultaneously, allowing loosened debris to backflow through the pump and be deposited at the bottom of the wellbore.
To summarize, the Pump Clean Mode 300 vibrates the pumping unit during the upstroke and oscillates the rod-string 82 at various frequencies by progressively shortening the pumping stroke. The flowchart of
In
Field Results of Pump Clean Mode
The linear rod pump system 100 including the controller 108 configured with Pump Clean Mode 300 was deployed with a remote monitoring system on an oil well. The pump periodically produces solids that cause the traveling valve 80 to stick open. A remote monitoring system of the pump system 100 provides operational and diagnostic reports including an alarm if the pump system 100 malfunctions, such as a pump valve 80 becoming stuck, at which time the Pump Clean Mode 300 feature may be initiated.
The traveling valve 80 was observed to stick occasionally during normal operation of the sucker rod pump 69. In some cases the problem would clear by itself. Other times it would persist indefinitely. The Pump Clean Mode 300 successfully restored normal operation to the pump 68 subsequent to a stuck traveling valve 80 event. The charts of
A second graph 604 shows pump system operation after the valve 80 becomes stuck. In this graph 604, the production rate has fallen to zero and the pump fill rate is −2. A second load graph 610 shows the change in rod load vs. rod position, when the valve 80 is stuck as compared to that shown during normal operation. In certain embodiments, the operator is alerted to the problem from the remote monitoring system summary trend 910, as shown in
In particular embodiments, the operator initiates remotely the Pump Clean Mode 300, after which the pump valve operation was immediately restored.
In another example, some sticking of the pump plunger (not shown) is observable during the upstroke in
For purposes of this disclosure, the term “coupled” means the joining of two components (electrical or mechanical) directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary in nature or moveable in nature. Such joining may be achieved with the two components (electrical or mechanical) and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or the two components and any additional member being attached to one another. Such adjoining may be permanent in nature or alternatively be removable or releasable in nature.
Although the foregoing description of the present invention has been shown and described with reference to particular embodiments and applications thereof, it has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the particular embodiments and applications disclosed. It will be apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art that a number of changes, modifications, variations, or alterations to the invention as described herein may be made, none of which depart from the spirit or scope of the present invention. The particular embodiments and applications were chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such changes, modifications, variations, and alterations should therefore be seen as being within the scope of the present invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.
This patent application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/704,079, filed May 5, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/990,492, filed May 8, 2014, the entire teachings and disclosure of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2551434 | Gray et al. | May 1951 | A |
2667932 | Bodine, Jr. | Feb 1954 | A |
2691300 | Morris | Oct 1954 | A |
2918127 | Bodine, Jr. | Dec 1959 | A |
3203257 | Geyer | Aug 1965 | A |
3343409 | Gibbs | Sep 1967 | A |
3585484 | Dortort | Jun 1971 | A |
3741686 | Smith | Jun 1973 | A |
3765234 | Sievert | Oct 1973 | A |
3851995 | Mills | Dec 1974 | A |
3854846 | Douglas | Dec 1974 | A |
3915225 | Swink | Oct 1975 | A |
3918843 | Douglas et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3930752 | Douglas | Jan 1976 | A |
3936231 | Douglas | Feb 1976 | A |
3938910 | Douglas | Feb 1976 | A |
3951209 | Gibbs | Apr 1976 | A |
3963374 | Sullivan | Jun 1976 | A |
3965983 | Watson | Jun 1976 | A |
3998568 | Hynd | Dec 1976 | A |
4058757 | Welton et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4098340 | Steele | Jul 1978 | A |
4102394 | Botts | Jul 1978 | A |
4108574 | Bartley et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4114375 | Saruwatari | Sep 1978 | A |
4118148 | Allen | Oct 1978 | A |
4145161 | Skinner | Mar 1979 | A |
4171185 | Duke et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4181003 | Kononov et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4194393 | Boley | Mar 1980 | A |
4207763 | Huydts et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4220440 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4226404 | Zens | Oct 1980 | A |
4276003 | Perkins et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4286925 | Standish | Sep 1981 | A |
4342364 | Bodine | Aug 1982 | A |
4358248 | Bodine | Nov 1982 | A |
4363605 | Mills | Dec 1982 | A |
4370098 | McClain et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4390321 | Langlois et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4406122 | McDuffie | Sep 1983 | A |
4438628 | Creamer | Mar 1984 | A |
4474002 | Perry | Oct 1984 | A |
4476418 | Werner | Oct 1984 | A |
4480960 | Streib | Nov 1984 | A |
4483188 | McTamaney et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4487061 | McTamaney et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4487554 | Bodine | Dec 1984 | A |
4490094 | Gibbs | Dec 1984 | A |
4498845 | Pittman | Feb 1985 | A |
4507055 | Fair et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508487 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4508488 | Pikna | Apr 1985 | A |
4509901 | McTamaney et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4534168 | Brantly | Aug 1985 | A |
4534706 | Palm et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4541274 | Purcupile | Sep 1985 | A |
4551072 | Barall | Nov 1985 | A |
4583915 | Montgomery et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4590787 | Trimborn | May 1986 | A |
4594665 | Chandra et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4606217 | Schiller et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4631918 | Rosman | Dec 1986 | A |
4631954 | Mills | Dec 1986 | A |
4644256 | Farias et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4661751 | Werner | Apr 1987 | A |
4681167 | Soderberg | Jul 1987 | A |
4691511 | Dollison | Sep 1987 | A |
4695231 | Bodine | Sep 1987 | A |
4695779 | Yates | Sep 1987 | A |
4716555 | Bodine | Dec 1987 | A |
4719811 | Lang et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4741397 | Weeks | May 1988 | A |
4747451 | Adams, Jr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
4782258 | Petrosky | Nov 1988 | A |
4788873 | Laney | Dec 1988 | A |
4807518 | Berchtold et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817712 | Bodine | Apr 1989 | A |
4830112 | Erickson | May 1989 | A |
4836497 | Beeson | Jun 1989 | A |
4859151 | Reed | Aug 1989 | A |
4867000 | Lentz | Sep 1989 | A |
4873635 | Mills | Oct 1989 | A |
4935685 | Justus et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4971522 | Butlin | Nov 1990 | A |
4973226 | McKee | Nov 1990 | A |
5006044 | Walker, Sr. et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5027909 | Carter et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044888 | Hester, II | Sep 1991 | A |
5064349 | Turner et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5129264 | Lorenc | Jul 1992 | A |
5129267 | Nicholls | Jul 1992 | A |
5167490 | McKee et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5180289 | Wenholz et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5204595 | Opal et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205163 | Sananikone | Apr 1993 | A |
5222867 | Walker, Sr. et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224834 | Westerman et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230607 | Mann | Jul 1993 | A |
5237863 | Dunham | Aug 1993 | A |
5240380 | Mabe | Aug 1993 | A |
5246076 | Watson | Sep 1993 | A |
5251696 | Boone et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5252031 | Gibbs | Oct 1993 | A |
5281100 | Diederich | Jan 1994 | A |
5284422 | Turner et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5316085 | Dawson | May 1994 | A |
5318409 | London et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5362206 | Westerman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372482 | London et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5425623 | London et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429193 | Hegebarth et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435166 | Sunada | Jul 1995 | A |
5441389 | Wolcott et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444609 | Swamy et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458466 | Mills | Oct 1995 | A |
5522713 | Lian | Jun 1996 | A |
5557154 | Erhart | Sep 1996 | A |
5577433 | Henry | Nov 1996 | A |
5634522 | Hershberger | Jun 1997 | A |
5656903 | Shui et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5806402 | Henry | Sep 1998 | A |
5809837 | Shaffer | Sep 1998 | A |
5819849 | Booth | Oct 1998 | A |
5820350 | Mantely et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823262 | Dutton | Oct 1998 | A |
5829530 | Nolen | Nov 1998 | A |
5832727 | Stanley | Nov 1998 | A |
5868029 | Paine | Feb 1999 | A |
5941305 | Thrasher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5996691 | Norris et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015271 | Boyer et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6041597 | Huang | Mar 2000 | A |
6041856 | Thrasher et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043569 | Ferguson | Mar 2000 | A |
6079491 | Stuebinger et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092600 | McKinzie et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6116139 | Yuda, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127743 | Levin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129110 | Kolb | Oct 2000 | A |
6155347 | Mills | Dec 2000 | A |
6164935 | Turiansky | Dec 2000 | A |
6176682 | Mills | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6275403 | McNulty et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343656 | Vazquez et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357100 | Speller, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6449567 | Desai et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464464 | Sabini et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6497281 | Vann | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6585041 | Crossley | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592340 | Horo et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615712 | Faitel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6619147 | Kojima | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640601 | Hatty | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6756707 | Hochhalter et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7126294 | Minami et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7168924 | Beck et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7321211 | Peterson | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7530799 | Smith | May 2009 | B2 |
7588076 | Jin | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7635022 | Han et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7713035 | Ford | May 2010 | B2 |
8152492 | Beck et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8360756 | Ford | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8397083 | Sussland et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8708671 | Gregory et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20020096060 | Kohno | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030180151 | Jeun | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030235492 | Mirsky et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050081660 | Migliori | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060024171 | Smith et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060067834 | Boyer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070222 | Clew | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090656 | Iwashita et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060171821 | Brown | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070098575 | Han et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070286750 | Beck et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090097994 | Beck et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110126012 | Ben-Ami et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110154041 | Godfrey et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110232283 | Gregory et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252229 | Belenkly et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120177504 | Beck | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120230841 | Gregory et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130110943 | Menon et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130302183 | Gregory et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140011541 | Cormier et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140219827 | Gregory et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140294603 | Best | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150322755 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H05012669 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H07103136 | Apr 1995 | JP |
H11504408 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2004028007 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2005054699 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2014-051918 | Mar 2014 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Exlar Roller Screw Basics; website http://www.exlar.com/TI_ref_rollScrew_oview.htnl; date last visited Sep. 22, 2006; 2 pages. |
Exlar PRS Series Roller Screw Overview; website http://www.exlar.com/prod_PRS_oview_htnl; date last visited Sep. 22, 2006; 3 pages. |
Gibbs, S.C.: “Predicting the Behavior of Sucker-Rod Pumping Systems”, JPT (Jul. 1963, 769-78, Trans, AIME 228). |
Garlow, M.E.: Sensorless Estimation of a Sucker-Rod Pump Downhold Dynacard, Unico, Inc., Aug. 12, 2002. |
Everitt, T.A, and Jennings, J.W.: An Improved Finite-Difference Calculation of Downhold Dynamometer Cards for Sucker-Rod Pumps, Paper SPE 18189, SPE Production Engineering (Feb. 1992). |
Jansen, P.L. and Lorenz, R.D.: Accurary Limitations of Velocity and Flux Estimation in Direct Field Oriented Induction Machines, Power Electronics and Applications, 1993, Fifth European Conference on , 1993; 312-318, vol. 4. |
Lorenz, R.D. and Lawson, D.B.: A Simplified Approach to Continuous On-Line Tuning of Field-Oriented Induction Machine Drives, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 26, No. 3, May/Jun. 1990. |
Hasan, A.R. and Kabir, C.S.: Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in Wellbores, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX, 2002. |
Kuhne, Steven and Riefenstahl, Ulrich: A New Torque Calculator for AC Induction Motor Drives that Improves Accuracy and Dynamic Behavior Apr. 1999, IEEE. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170074080 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61990492 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14704079 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15343453 | US |