Subterranean pump with pump cleaning mode

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10156109
  • Patent Number
    10,156,109
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 4, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 18, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
A method to dislodge debris from a pump system in which the pump system includes a down-hole pump coupled by a rod string to an above-ground pump actuator, which is coupled to a controller configured to operate the pump system. The method also includes determining that the pump system should begin operating in a pump clean mode, and implementing the pump clean mode configured in the controller. The method also includes impressing a preset vibration frequency during a portion of a pump stroke of at least one pump cycle. Further, the method calls for determining that the pump clean mode is complete, and returning the pump system to a normal operation mode.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to sucker rod pump systems as more particularly to cleaning debris from a downhole pump.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Sucker rod pumps occasionally encounter solid particles or “trash” during operation. Oftentimes these solids pass harmlessly through the pump. Other times the debris will cause the pump traveling and/or standing valves to not properly seat (stick open, for example). If the traveling or standing valve do not properly seat, the pump will malfunction, adversely affecting the production rate of fluid.


It would therefore be desirable to have a pumping system that addresses some of the aforementioned problems, and further includes embodiments of construction which is both durable and long lasting. It would also be desirable if this pumping system required little or no maintenance to be provided by the user throughout its operating lifetime. Additionally, it would be desirable if the aforementioned pumping system were of inexpensive construction to thereby afford it the broadest possible market. Finally, it is also an objective that all of the aforesaid advantages and objectives be achieved without incurring any substantial relative disadvantage.


The disadvantages and limitations of the background art discussed above are substantially overcome by the present invention.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

There is disclosed a method to dislodge debris from a pump system with the pump system including a downhole pump coupled to a rod string to an above-ground actuator which is coupled to a controller. The controller is configured to operate the pump system, wherein the actuator has an adjustable stroke length.


The method includes determining that the pump system should begin operating in a Pump Clean Mode. Upon start, the Pump Clean Mode is implemented by the controller. The controller cycles the pump actuator at a preset command speed using a preset starting stroke length, preset acceleration rate, and a preset deceleration rate. The controller continues to cycle the pump actuator while incrementally decreasing the stroke length at a preset stroke length increment resulting in increased pump cycling frequencies. The controller determines that the Pump Clean Mode is complete and returns the pump system to a normal operation mode.


The method may also include impressing a preset vibration frequency during a portion of the pump stroke of a pump cycle. In some circumstances the vibration frequency is the pump system rod string resonant frequency.


In another embodiment, the preset command speed of the Pump Clean Mode is a full speed operation for the pump system. In a further embodiment, the controller determines that the pump system should begin operating in the clean mode when it determines that the pump system output has decreased.


The controller can also be configured wherein the step of determining that the Pump Clean Mode is complete comprises determining that the stroke length has become less than or equal to a preset minimum stroke length. The Pump Clean Mode can be implemented in the controller by one of remote telemetry, by a key pad coupled to the controller, or the controller can be configured to automatically operate at a preset time, after a preset stroke count, or automatically upon detection of a malfunction of the pump.


There is also disclosed the method to dislodge debris from a pump system with the pump system including a downhole pump coupled to a rod string and to an above-ground actuator which is coupled to a controller. The controller is configured to operate the pump system.


The method includes determining that the pump system should begin operating in a Pump Clean Mode and implementing the Pump Clean Mode which is configured in the controller. The controller is configured to impress a preset vibration frequency during a portion of the pump stroke for each pump cycle, and when the controller determines that the Pump Clean Mode is complete, the controller returns the pump system to a normal operation mode.


In one embodiment the vibration frequency is the pump system rod string resonant frequency. In a further embodiment, the step of determining that the pump system should begin operating in the Clean Mode includes determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system have been completed in the normal operation mode. In certain embodiments, the step of determining that the pump system should begin operating in the Clean Mode includes determining that the pump system output has decreased.


A further embodiment provides that the step of determining that the Pump Clean Mode is complete includes determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system have been completed in the Pump Clean Mode. In particular embodiments, implementation of the Pump Clean Mode is accomplished by one of remote telemetry, key pad, automatically at preset time and automatically upon detection of a malfunction of the pump.


Such an apparatus should be of construction which is both durable and long lasting, and it should also require little or no maintenance to be provided by the user throughout its operating lifetime. In order to enhance the market appeal of such an apparatus, it should also be of inexpensive construction to thereby afford it the broadest possible market. Finally, the advantages of such an apparatus should be achieved without incurring any substantial relative disadvantage.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other advantages of the present disclosure are best understood with reference to the drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is an illustration of a linear rod pumping apparatus coupled to a sucker pump type of a downhole pumping apparatus, incorporating an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the linear rod pumping apparatus coupled to a wellhead decoupled from a walking beam pumping apparatus, incorporating an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a Pump Clean Mode configured in a controller of the linear rod pumping apparatus as illustrated in FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphical illustrations showing normal operation of a sucker rod pump type of linear rod pumping apparatus as configured for five strokes per minute (SPM).



FIGS. 5A and 5B are graphical illustrations showing exemplary system performance during a transition from normal operation of the linear rod pumping apparatus to a Pump Clean Mode, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 6 is a series of exemplary graphical illustrations showing dynamometer trend traces illustrating a stuck valve of the pump and dynamometer traces before and after a Pump Clean Mode operation, according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIGS. 7-9 illustrate exemplary Well Reports generated by the controller illustrated in FIG. 1 at time periods, respectively, prior to a stuck valve event, during a valve stuck open, and after a Pump Clean Mode operation, according to an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary pump load trend during a stuck valve event and after initiation of a Pump Clean Mode process, according to an embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Sucker rod pumps typically are used in down-hole wells in petroleum production such as oil and gas. During a typical operation, the pump may lose efficiency because of debris sucked into the pump causing loss of production and maintenance costs.



FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a first exemplary embodiment of a linear rod pumping system 100 mounted on the well head 54 of a hydrocarbon well 56. The well includes a casing 60 which extends downward into the ground through a subterranean formation 62 to a depth sufficient to reach an oil reservoir 64. The casing 60 includes a series of perforations 66, through which fluid from the hydrocarbon reservoir enter into the casing 60, to thereby provide a source of fluid for a down-hole pumping apparatus 68, installed at the bottom of a length of tubing 70 which terminates in an fluid outlet 72 at a point above the surface 74 of the ground. The casing 60 terminates in a gas outlet 76 above the surface of the ground 74.


For purposes of this application a sucker rod pump is defined as a down-hole pumping apparatus 69 that includes a stationary valve 78, and a traveling valve 80. The traveling valve 80 is attached to a rod string 82 extending upward through the tubing 70 and exiting the well head 54 at the polished rod 52. Those having skill in the art will recognize that the down-hole pumping apparatus 68, in the exemplary embodiment of the invention, forms a traditional sucker-rod pump 69 arrangement for lifting fluid from the bottom of the well 56 as the polished rod 52 imparts reciprocal motion to rod string 82 and the rod string 82 in turn causes reciprocal motion of the traveling valve 80 through a pump stroke 84. In a typical hydrocarbon well, the rod string 82 may be several thousand feet long and the pump stroke 84 may be several feet long.


As shown in FIG. 1, the first exemplary embodiment of a linear rod pump system 100, includes an above-ground actuator 92, for example a linear mechanical actuator arrangement 102, a reversible motor 104, and a control arrangement 106, with the control arrangement 106 including a controller 108 and a motor drive 110. The linear mechanical actuator arrangement 102 includes a substantially vertically movable member attached to the polished rod 52 for imparting and controlling vertical motion of the rod string 82 and the sucker-rod pump 69.


The reversible motor, for example an electric motor or a hydraulic motor of a linear rod pump apparatus, includes a reversibly rotatable element thereof, operatively connected to the substantially vertically movable member of the linear mechanical actuator arrangement 102 in a manner establishing a fixed relationship between the rotational position of the motor 104 and the vertical position of a rack. As will be understood, by those having skill in the art, having a fixed relationship between the rotational position of the motor 104 and the vertical position of the polished rod 52 provides a number of significant advantages in the construction and operation of a sucker-rod pump apparatus, according to the invention.



FIG. 2 shows an exemplary embodiment of a linear rod pumping apparatus 200, mounted on a standoff 202 to the well head 54, and operatively connected for driving the polished rod 52. In FIG. 2, the exemplary embodiment of the linear rod pumping apparatus 200 is illustrated adjacent to the walking beam pumping apparatus 50, to show the substantial reduction in size, weight, and complexity afforded through practice of the invention, as compared to prior approaches utilizing walking beam apparatuses 50.


As shown in FIG. 2, the exemplary embodiment of the linear rod pumping apparatus 200 includes a linear mechanical actuator arrangement 204 which, in turn, includes a rack and pinion gearing arrangement having a rack and a pinion operatively connected through a gearbox 210 to be driven by a reversible electric motor 104.


Occasionally debris will dislodge or clear as a result of normal operation of the pump, with no intervention required. Other times it is necessary for a crew to use specialized equipment to “flush” the pump, or possibly even pull the pump out of the wellbore for inspection and remediation. Some operators may attempt to “bump down,” where the pump and rod string are dropped from a short distance in an attempt to dislodge the debris through the shock of the pump plunger striking the bottom. These types of interventions are expensive and time consuming. Furthermore, lost production when the pump is malfunctioning can be a major loss of revenue for the producer.


The methods described herein are for an autonomous process for clearing debris from a typical sucker rod pump system with little or no user intervention required, ultimately resulting in increased profit for the petroleum producer through increased production and reduced maintenance costs. Embodiments of the invention include a process, as disclosed herein, in which may be embedded into the sucker rod pumping unit prime mover (a controlled drive system).


In one embodiment, the process is implemented in a Unico LRP® sucker rod pumping unit system. A Pump Clean Mode 300, as illustrated in the flowchart of FIG. 3, is embedded in the controller 108, and can be used to automatically clear debris from the pump. The Pump Clean Mode 300 routine can be executed by a control arrangement 106 which includes at least one of a remotely (through, for example RFI or WiFi telemetry), at a pump system keypad, automatically at preset times, or automatically if the controller 108 detects a malfunctioning pump valve 78, 80.


In general, the Pump Clean Mode 300 vibrates the pump at strategic predetermined frequencies for a predetermined time, for example approximately two minutes to dislodge debris on the pump valve 78, 80, allowing the debris to pass through the valves 78, 80 and into the pipe string 82 of the wellbore 60. More specifically, in certain embodiments, there are two separate phases to the Pump Clean Mode 300: 1) High speed normal operation with vibration during the upstroke of the pump; and 2) High speed oscillation of the pumping unit by progressively shortening the pumping stroke.


Referring again to FIGS. 1 and 2, the act of vibrating the pumping unit causes kinetic energy to be transmitted to the downhole pump 68 via the rod-string 82 in the form of shock loads in excess of the normal pump operational loads. The acceleration peaks of the shock loads serve to jar debris loose. The vibration is most useful during the upstroke of the pump, when the traveling valve 80 attempts to seat.


To maximize the energy of the shock load (peaks) transferred to the down-hole pump 68, it is desirable to oscillate the rod string 82 at its natural resonant frequency. This can be accomplished incidentally by sweeping through a frequency spectrum, or by targeting the rod-string resonant frequency, calculated with the following equation:







a
.




f

=


1

2

π





κ
M







In this equation, f is the natural frequency and M is the mass of the rod 52, which is found by dividing the weight (W) by gravity M=W/g. K is the stiffness of the rod and depends upon the length of the rod, its Modulus of Elasticity (material property), and the moment of inertia.


One method for sweeping frequencies is to progressively shorten the pump stroke 84 while operating the pumping unit at full speed, causing a corresponding increase in stroking frequency (strokes per minute). At some point during this sweep, the stroking frequency will match the rod-string natural frequency. An added benefit to this technique is establishment of a state whereby both the traveling and standing valves 78, 80 of the sucker rod pump 69 are opened simultaneously, allowing loosened debris to backflow through the pump and be deposited at the bottom of the wellbore.


To summarize, the Pump Clean Mode 300 vibrates the pumping unit during the upstroke and oscillates the rod-string 82 at various frequencies by progressively shortening the pumping stroke. The flowchart of FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of the Pump Clean Mode 300 process. The Pump Clean Mode 300 is included in the controller 108. In a particular embodiment, the controller 108, shown in FIG. 1, will use estimated down-hole states including pump load and position to determine the best operating mode. These down-hole states can also be used to detect a stuck valve condition, as demonstrates in the following examples below. If the controller 108 detects a stuck valve condition, the Pump Clean Mode 300 can be initiated in the controller 108 by one of the four ways described above.


In FIG. 3, the Pump Clean Mode 300 is initialized at start 302, then in sequence:

    • 304 Cycle pumping unit up and down in a normal manner, at preset high speed, with preset hard acceleration and deceleration rates, with a preset vibration frequency introduced during the upstroke;
    • 306 Increment stroke counter after the pumping unit has completed a full stroke;
    • 308 If stroke counter is greater than preset amount X, then move to block 310, else continue to execute 304;
    • 310 Shorten stroke length by preset amount Y, causing the pumping unit to stroke (up and down) a shorter distance than previously;
    • 312 Cycle pumping unit up and down in a normal manner, at preset high speed, with preset hard acceleration and deceleration rates. The unit is now cycling with a shorter stroke length, and hence the stroking frequency (strokes per minute) is increased;
    • 314 Increment stroke counter after the pumping unit has completed a full stroke;
    • 316 If stroke counter is greater than preset amount Z, then move to block 318 (Pump Clean cycle is complete—return to normal operation), else continue to execute 310 (progressively shorten stroke length);


      Laboratory Simulation of Pump Clean Mode



FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphical illustrations showing normal operation of a 56-inch sucker rod pump, for example a linear rod pump, on an example well (4,000 feet deep, 1.5 inch pump, ¾ inch steel rods). Rod position 400 is shown in inches, rod velocity 402 is shown in in/sec in FIG. 4A, while in FIG. 4B downhole pump velocity 406 is shown in in/sec, and downhole pump acceleration 408 is shown in in/sec2. Pump acceleration 408 is shifted down by 40 units on the vertical axis for clarity.



FIGS. 5A and 5B are graphical illustrations showing exemplary system performance during a transition from normal operation to the Pump Clean Mode 300. FIG. 5A shows an increase in rod velocity 502 after the transition to Pump Clean Mode 300., and FIG. 5B shows that pump velocity 406 and acceleration 408 are increased when resonant frequencies are excited (as compared to FIG. 4B). The pump motor 104 vibrates during the pump upstroke, and the stroke length gets progressively shorter, causing the stroking rate (strokes per minute) to increase. At the rod string resonant frequency, the pump dynamic force (acceleration) is maximized, thus imparting a disruptive force on the debris. At high oscillation frequency, both valves, standing 78 and traveling 80, will remain open, allowing the debris to pass through the pump and into the well “rathole.”


Field Results of Pump Clean Mode


The linear rod pump system 100 including the controller 108 configured with Pump Clean Mode 300 was deployed with a remote monitoring system on an oil well. The pump periodically produces solids that cause the traveling valve 80 to stick open. A remote monitoring system of the pump system 100 provides operational and diagnostic reports including an alarm if the pump system 100 malfunctions, such as a pump valve 80 becoming stuck, at which time the Pump Clean Mode 300 feature may be initiated.


The traveling valve 80 was observed to stick occasionally during normal operation of the sucker rod pump 69. In some cases the problem would clear by itself. Other times it would persist indefinitely. The Pump Clean Mode 300 successfully restored normal operation to the pump 68 subsequent to a stuck traveling valve 80 event. The charts of FIGS. 6 to 10 illustrate one such example.



FIG. 6 shows an exemplary display 600 that includes a dynamometer trend leading up to the stuck valve 80 and subsequent to the Pump Clean Mode 300 implementation in the controller 108. In particular embodiments, the display 600 would be available to remote users operating the pump system 100 via remote telemetry. The dynamometer trend is illustrated in a series of graphs include a first graph 602 showing pump system operation prior to the stuck valve 80. First graph 602 shows a production rate of 137 barrels per day (BPD) and a pump fill rate of 100%. A first load graph 608 illustrating the rod load vs. rod position during normal operation is also shown. The data is collected by the controller 108 and reported using a remote well monitoring tool (not shown).


A second graph 604 shows pump system operation after the valve 80 becomes stuck. In this graph 604, the production rate has fallen to zero and the pump fill rate is −2. A second load graph 610 shows the change in rod load vs. rod position, when the valve 80 is stuck as compared to that shown during normal operation. In certain embodiments, the operator is alerted to the problem from the remote monitoring system summary trend 910, as shown in FIG. 10. The summary trend 910 also shows that the production rate is an estimated zero barrels per day (BPD), while the pump fill was −2, and the pump load was zero (no fluid being lifted). It can also be seen from FIGS. 6 and 10 that the problem was observed to be persistent. A third graph 606 shows pump system operation after the implementation of the Pump Clean Mode 300 in which all parameters and a third load graph 612 are returned to normal.



FIG. 7 shows an exemplary first Well Report 700 generated by the controller 108 prior to the stuck valve 80 (i.e., normal operation). The dynamometer plots 702, 704 show pump operation is operating properly. The inferred production rate is 137 BPD and the pump fill monitor shows that the pump fill rate is 100%. In the embodiment of FIG. 7, the first Well Report 700 includes data for the following parameters: Pumping Unit Specification; Road and Pump Data; Operating Conditions: Fluid Production Data; Power Statistics; Liquid and Gas Statistics; Loading Statistics; Well and Fluid Data; Operating Statistics; Gauged Statistics; Gearbox and Balance; and Diagnostics. In, alternative embodiments, the Well Report 700 could include a fewer or greater number of operating parameters.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary second Well Report 800 generated by the controller 108 when the pump traveling valve 80 is stuck open. The dynamometer plots 802, 804 reveal that the pumping unit is raising and lowering only the weight of the rod string (no fluid load). This condition is indicated in the Fluid Production Data section by a 0 BPD production rate, and in the Liquid and Gas Statistics section by a −2 pump fill rate. The problem could either be a parted rod (near the pump) or a stuck valve 80. In this example, it is a stuck valve 80.


In particular embodiments, the operator initiates remotely the Pump Clean Mode 300, after which the pump valve operation was immediately restored. FIG. 9 shows an exemplary third Well Report 900 after the Pump Clean Mode 300 feature was executed. The dynamometer plots 902, 904 show that pump operation has returned to normal following implementation of the Pump Clean Mode 300. In particular embodiments of the invention, the controller 108 is configured to automatically execute a Pump Clean Mode 300 when a stuck valve condition is detected.


In another example, some sticking of the pump plunger (not shown) is observable during the upstroke in FIG. 6 (the pump load bulges out). This is likely an indicator of the same solids that clogged the traveling valve 80, but in this case also interfering with the plunger. The effect is also observed in an exemplary increased pump load trend 910, generated by the controller 108 subsequent the stuck valve 80, as illustrated in FIG. 10. In the embodiment of FIG. 10, there are four event markers: Pump Average SPM 912 with accompany graph 913; Pump Fill Monitor 914 with accompany graph 915; Fluid Flow Monitor 916 with accompany graph 917; and Pump Load Monitor 918 with accompany graph 919.


For purposes of this disclosure, the term “coupled” means the joining of two components (electrical or mechanical) directly or indirectly to one another. Such joining may be stationary in nature or moveable in nature. Such joining may be achieved with the two components (electrical or mechanical) and any additional intermediate members being integrally formed as a single unitary body with one another or the two components and any additional member being attached to one another. Such adjoining may be permanent in nature or alternatively be removable or releasable in nature.


Although the foregoing description of the present invention has been shown and described with reference to particular embodiments and applications thereof, it has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the particular embodiments and applications disclosed. It will be apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art that a number of changes, modifications, variations, or alterations to the invention as described herein may be made, none of which depart from the spirit or scope of the present invention. The particular embodiments and applications were chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such changes, modifications, variations, and alterations should therefore be seen as being within the scope of the present invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally, and equitably entitled.

Claims
  • 1. A method to dislodge debris from a pump system, the pump system including a down-hole pump coupled by a rod string to an above-ground actuator which is coupled to a controller configured to operate the pump system, the method comprising: determining that the pump system should begin operating in a pump clean mode;implementing the pump clean mode configured in the controller;impressing a preset vibration frequency during a portion of a pump stroke of at least one pump cycle;determining that the pump clean mode is complete; andreturning the pump system to a normal operation mode.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the preset vibration frequency is the pump system rod string resonant frequency.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the pump system should begin operating in the pump clean mode comprises determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system have been completed in the normal operation mode.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the pump system should begin operating in the pump clean mode comprises determining that a pump system output has decreased.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the pump clean mode is complete comprises determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system have been completed in the pump clean mode.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the implementation of the pump clean mode is accomplished by a control arrangement configured with one of remote telemetry, key pad, automatically at preset time, and automatically upon detection of a malfunction of the pump.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the pump actuator has an adjustable stroke length, the method further comprising: cycling the pump actuator at a preset command speed using a preset starting stroke length, preset acceleration rate and a preset deceleration rate; andcontinuing to cycle the pump actuator while incrementally decreasing the stroke length by a preset stroke length increment resulting in increased pump cycling frequencies.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the preset command speed is a full speed for the pump system.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of determining that the pump clean mode is complete comprises determining that the stroke length has become less than or equal to a preset minimum stroke length.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/704,079, filed May 5, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/990,492, filed May 8, 2014, the entire teachings and disclosure of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.

US Referenced Citations (190)
Number Name Date Kind
2551434 Gray et al. May 1951 A
2667932 Bodine, Jr. Feb 1954 A
2691300 Morris Oct 1954 A
2918127 Bodine, Jr. Dec 1959 A
3203257 Geyer Aug 1965 A
3343409 Gibbs Sep 1967 A
3585484 Dortort Jun 1971 A
3741686 Smith Jun 1973 A
3765234 Sievert Oct 1973 A
3851995 Mills Dec 1974 A
3854846 Douglas Dec 1974 A
3915225 Swink Oct 1975 A
3918843 Douglas et al. Nov 1975 A
3930752 Douglas Jan 1976 A
3936231 Douglas Feb 1976 A
3938910 Douglas Feb 1976 A
3951209 Gibbs Apr 1976 A
3963374 Sullivan Jun 1976 A
3965983 Watson Jun 1976 A
3998568 Hynd Dec 1976 A
4058757 Welton et al. Nov 1977 A
4098340 Steele Jul 1978 A
4102394 Botts Jul 1978 A
4108574 Bartley et al. Aug 1978 A
4114375 Saruwatari Sep 1978 A
4118148 Allen Oct 1978 A
4145161 Skinner Mar 1979 A
4171185 Duke et al. Oct 1979 A
4181003 Kononov et al. Jan 1980 A
4194393 Boley Mar 1980 A
4207763 Huydts et al. Jun 1980 A
4220440 Taylor et al. Sep 1980 A
4226404 Zens Oct 1980 A
4276003 Perkins et al. Jun 1981 A
4286925 Standish Sep 1981 A
4342364 Bodine Aug 1982 A
4358248 Bodine Nov 1982 A
4363605 Mills Dec 1982 A
4370098 McClain et al. Jan 1983 A
4390321 Langlois et al. Jun 1983 A
4406122 McDuffie Sep 1983 A
4438628 Creamer Mar 1984 A
4474002 Perry Oct 1984 A
4476418 Werner Oct 1984 A
4480960 Streib Nov 1984 A
4483188 McTamaney et al. Nov 1984 A
4487061 McTamaney et al. Dec 1984 A
4487554 Bodine Dec 1984 A
4490094 Gibbs Dec 1984 A
4498845 Pittman Feb 1985 A
4507055 Fair et al. Mar 1985 A
4508487 Taylor et al. Apr 1985 A
4508488 Pikna Apr 1985 A
4509901 McTamaney et al. Apr 1985 A
4534168 Brantly Aug 1985 A
4534706 Palm et al. Aug 1985 A
4541274 Purcupile Sep 1985 A
4551072 Barall Nov 1985 A
4583915 Montgomery et al. Apr 1986 A
4590787 Trimborn May 1986 A
4594665 Chandra et al. Jun 1986 A
4606217 Schiller et al. Aug 1986 A
4631918 Rosman Dec 1986 A
4631954 Mills Dec 1986 A
4644256 Farias et al. Feb 1987 A
4661751 Werner Apr 1987 A
4681167 Soderberg Jul 1987 A
4691511 Dollison Sep 1987 A
4695231 Bodine Sep 1987 A
4695779 Yates Sep 1987 A
4716555 Bodine Dec 1987 A
4719811 Lang et al. Jan 1988 A
4741397 Weeks May 1988 A
4747451 Adams, Jr. et al. May 1988 A
4782258 Petrosky Nov 1988 A
4788873 Laney Dec 1988 A
4807518 Berchtold et al. Feb 1989 A
4817712 Bodine Apr 1989 A
4830112 Erickson May 1989 A
4836497 Beeson Jun 1989 A
4859151 Reed Aug 1989 A
4867000 Lentz Sep 1989 A
4873635 Mills Oct 1989 A
4935685 Justus et al. Jun 1990 A
4971522 Butlin Nov 1990 A
4973226 McKee Nov 1990 A
5006044 Walker, Sr. et al. Apr 1991 A
5027909 Carter et al. Jul 1991 A
5044888 Hester, II Sep 1991 A
5064349 Turner et al. Nov 1991 A
5129264 Lorenc Jul 1992 A
5129267 Nicholls Jul 1992 A
5167490 McKee et al. Dec 1992 A
5180289 Wenholz et al. Jan 1993 A
5204595 Opal et al. Apr 1993 A
5205163 Sananikone Apr 1993 A
5222867 Walker, Sr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5224834 Westerman et al. Jul 1993 A
5230607 Mann Jul 1993 A
5237863 Dunham Aug 1993 A
5240380 Mabe Aug 1993 A
5246076 Watson Sep 1993 A
5251696 Boone et al. Oct 1993 A
5252031 Gibbs Oct 1993 A
5281100 Diederich Jan 1994 A
5284422 Turner et al. Feb 1994 A
5316085 Dawson May 1994 A
5318409 London et al. Jun 1994 A
5362206 Westerman et al. Nov 1994 A
5372482 London et al. Dec 1994 A
5425623 London et al. Jun 1995 A
5429193 Hegebarth et al. Jul 1995 A
5435166 Sunada Jul 1995 A
5441389 Wolcott et al. Aug 1995 A
5444609 Swamy et al. Aug 1995 A
5458466 Mills Oct 1995 A
5522713 Lian Jun 1996 A
5557154 Erhart Sep 1996 A
5577433 Henry Nov 1996 A
5634522 Hershberger Jun 1997 A
5656903 Shui et al. Aug 1997 A
5806402 Henry Sep 1998 A
5809837 Shaffer Sep 1998 A
5819849 Booth Oct 1998 A
5820350 Mantely et al. Oct 1998 A
5823262 Dutton Oct 1998 A
5829530 Nolen Nov 1998 A
5832727 Stanley Nov 1998 A
5868029 Paine Feb 1999 A
5941305 Thrasher et al. Aug 1999 A
5996691 Norris et al. Dec 1999 A
6015271 Boyer et al. Jan 2000 A
6041597 Huang Mar 2000 A
6041856 Thrasher et al. Mar 2000 A
6043569 Ferguson Mar 2000 A
6079491 Stuebinger et al. Jun 2000 A
6092600 McKinzie et al. Jul 2000 A
6116139 Yuda, Jr. et al. Sep 2000 A
6127743 Levin et al. Oct 2000 A
6129110 Kolb Oct 2000 A
6155347 Mills Dec 2000 A
6164935 Turiansky Dec 2000 A
6176682 Mills Jan 2001 B1
6275403 McNulty et al. Aug 2001 B1
6343656 Vazquez et al. Feb 2002 B1
6357100 Speller, Jr. et al. Mar 2002 B2
6449567 Desai et al. Sep 2002 B1
6464464 Sabini et al. Oct 2002 B2
6497281 Vann Dec 2002 B2
6585041 Crossley Jul 2003 B2
6592340 Horo et al. Jul 2003 B1
6615712 Faitel et al. Sep 2003 B2
6619147 Kojima Sep 2003 B1
6640601 Hatty Nov 2003 B2
6756707 Hochhalter et al. Jun 2004 B2
7126294 Minami et al. Oct 2006 B2
7168924 Beck et al. Jan 2007 B2
7321211 Peterson Jan 2008 B2
7530799 Smith May 2009 B2
7588076 Jin Sep 2009 B2
7635022 Han et al. Dec 2009 B2
7713035 Ford May 2010 B2
8152492 Beck et al. Apr 2012 B2
8360756 Ford Jan 2013 B2
8397083 Sussland et al. Mar 2013 B1
8708671 Gregory et al. Apr 2014 B2
20020096060 Kohno Jul 2002 A1
20030180151 Jeun Sep 2003 A1
20030235492 Mirsky et al. Dec 2003 A1
20050081660 Migliori Apr 2005 A1
20060024171 Smith et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060067834 Boyer et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060070222 Clew Apr 2006 A1
20060090656 Iwashita et al. May 2006 A1
20060171821 Brown Aug 2006 A1
20070098575 Han et al. May 2007 A1
20070286750 Beck et al. Dec 2007 A1
20090097994 Beck et al. Apr 2009 A1
20110126012 Ben-Ami et al. May 2011 A1
20110154041 Godfrey et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110232283 Gregory et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110252229 Belenkly et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120177504 Beck Jul 2012 A1
20120230841 Gregory et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130110943 Menon et al. May 2013 A1
20130302183 Gregory et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140011541 Cormier et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140219827 Gregory et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140294603 Best Oct 2014 A1
20150322755 Peterson et al. Nov 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
H05012669 Feb 1993 JP
H07103136 Apr 1995 JP
H11504408 Apr 1999 JP
2004028007 Jan 2004 JP
2005054699 Mar 2005 JP
2014-051918 Mar 2014 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Exlar Roller Screw Basics; website http://www.exlar.com/TI_ref_rollScrew_oview.htnl; date last visited Sep. 22, 2006; 2 pages.
Exlar PRS Series Roller Screw Overview; website http://www.exlar.com/prod_PRS_oview_htnl; date last visited Sep. 22, 2006; 3 pages.
Gibbs, S.C.: “Predicting the Behavior of Sucker-Rod Pumping Systems”, JPT (Jul. 1963, 769-78, Trans, AIME 228).
Garlow, M.E.: Sensorless Estimation of a Sucker-Rod Pump Downhold Dynacard, Unico, Inc., Aug. 12, 2002.
Everitt, T.A, and Jennings, J.W.: An Improved Finite-Difference Calculation of Downhold Dynamometer Cards for Sucker-Rod Pumps, Paper SPE 18189, SPE Production Engineering (Feb. 1992).
Jansen, P.L. and Lorenz, R.D.: Accurary Limitations of Velocity and Flux Estimation in Direct Field Oriented Induction Machines, Power Electronics and Applications, 1993, Fifth European Conference on , 1993; 312-318, vol. 4.
Lorenz, R.D. and Lawson, D.B.: A Simplified Approach to Continuous On-Line Tuning of Field-Oriented Induction Machine Drives, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 26, No. 3, May/Jun. 1990.
Hasan, A.R. and Kabir, C.S.: Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in Wellbores, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX, 2002.
Kuhne, Steven and Riefenstahl, Ulrich: A New Torque Calculator for AC Induction Motor Drives that Improves Accuracy and Dynamic Behavior Apr. 1999, IEEE.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170074080 A1 Mar 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61990492 May 2014 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14704079 May 2015 US
Child 15343453 US